Más contenido relacionado La actualidad más candente (20) Similar a Organizational Agility: The Hidden Goal (And Often Missed Opportunity) of Agile Transformation (20) Organizational Agility: The Hidden Goal (And Often Missed Opportunity) of Agile Transformation 1. 8/1/13
1
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions ©
2012
BigVisible
Solu1ons
Michael
Hamman
Bob
Fischer
Jim
Elvidge
Organiza1onal
Agility:
The
Hidden
Goal
(and
OHen-‐Missed
Opportunity)
of
Agile
Transforma1on
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
2
Why Organizational
Agility?
2. 8/1/13
2
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
3
Most Agile adoptions focus on the
delivery capacity of teams or
aggregates of teams.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
A
Common
PaPern
of
Agile
Teams
Over
Time...
4
Time
Performance
Teams start off great guns.
3. 8/1/13
3
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
A
Common
PaPern
of
Agile
Teams
Over
Time...
5
Time
Performance
Then, at some point performance
and enthusiasm begin to plateau
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
A
Common
PaPern
of
Agile
Teams
Over
Time...
6
Time
Performance
Without substantial intervention,
those teams can plateau or even
begin to decline.
4. 8/1/13
4
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
What is Happening?
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
8
We can fix this
ourselves
Time
5. 8/1/13
5
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
9
We can fix this
ourselves
We can influence
others to fix this
Time
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
10
We can fix this
ourselves
We can influence
others to fix this
This is beyond our
control
Over time, the team confronts
things that appear more
challenging to improve.
Time
6. 8/1/13
6
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Managers that haven’t
changed to enable self-
organization still
attempt to control and
coordinate
11
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Staff
Caught
Between
Conflic1ng
Goals
12
Department
Goals
Product
or
Team
Goals
7. 8/1/13
7
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
13
Exis1ng
processes
have
not
been
reviewed
and
updated
to
support
agility
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
In
other
words,
your
teams
have
hit
an
ins1tu1onal
ceiling.
14
Time
Performance
Institutional Ceiling
8. 8/1/13
8
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
15
Merely
trying
to
resolve
these
challenges
tac1cally
is
not
sustainable.
There
are
simply
too
many
holes
to
plug.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
16
In
the
end,
we
need
to
think
about
agility
holis1cally.
(Moving
from
a
team
delivery
focus
toward
an
organiza1onal
learning
orienta1on.)
9. 8/1/13
9
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
17
In this session we share
some tools for thinking and
managing holistically.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
18
What is Organizational
Agility?
10. 8/1/13
10
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Working
Defini1on
19
Organiza1onal
agility
is
being
able
to
rapidly
sense
and
effec1vely
respond
to
arising
opportuni1es
and
challenges.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
20
Sense and Respond
11. 8/1/13
11
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
21
Fostering
organiza1onal
agility
requires
first
that
we
have
a
way
of
sensing
the
whole.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
MODEL:
Spectrum
of
Agility
Capabili1es
©
2010
BigVisible
Solu1ons,
Inc..
All
Rights
Reserved
22
• Leadership and management styles and beliefs
about what constitutes effective leadership and
management
• Structures, processes and systems by which work
gets done and is organized
• Collective beliefs, perspectives and habits by which
people make sense of things
• Product Management/Strategy
• Lean, continuous planning
• Product Development/Delivery
• Multiple Team/Programs
• Kanban
• Scrum
• Automated Testing
• Test-driven Development
• Continuous Integration
12. 8/1/13
12
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Spectrum
of
Agility
Capabili1es
©
2010
BigVisible
Solu1ons,
Inc..
All
Rights
Reserved
23
Broader organizational agility can be
achieved to the degree that agile capability
is realized across all five parts of
organizational array.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
24
To
get
bePer
at
seeing
this,
we’ll
want
to
first
re-‐orient
the
way
we
think
about
the
nature
of
organiza1ons.
13. 8/1/13
13
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
25
To
do
this,
we
start
by
considering
the
no1on
of
mental
models.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Our
Mental
Models
Color
Our
Op1ons
For
Working
Within
Organiza1ons
26
Experience
Preferences
Culture
Training
Mood
Photograph provided under Creative Commons License by Veni Markovski
Models
14. 8/1/13
14
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
• These
mental
models
determine
the
decisions
we
make,
the
plans
we
administer,
the
management
structures
we
put
in
place,
and
the
styles
of
leadership
we
believe
to
be
effec1ve.
• And
these
mental
models
are
largely
invisible
to
us
27
Mental
Models
Shape
Ac1on
Mental Models
And Context
Actions Results
Shapes Affects
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
The
Cynefin
Framework
From:
Snowden
and
Boone
28
"Cynefin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin (accessed October 4, 2011).
15. 8/1/13
15
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
The
Cynefin
Framework
Provides
a
Useful
Perspec1ve
for
Viewing
Organiza1on
and
Leadership
29
Photograph provided under Creative Commons License by Veni Markovski
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Cynefin
model
provides
a
set
of
explicitly
defined
mental
models—or
‘filters’-‐-‐through
which
we
might
produc1vely
observe
and
think
about
organiza1onal
phenomena.
30
16. 8/1/13
16
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
• Stability,
liPle
change
• Clear
cause
and
effect
rela1onships
• The
right
answer
is
self-‐
evident,
and
usually
there
is
a
single
right
answer
• “Known
knowns”
31
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
32
17. 8/1/13
17
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
• Rela1onship
between
cause
and
effect
is
there,
but
not
everyone
can
see
it
• Requires
high
degrees
of
exper1se
and
analysis
• Mul1ple
right
answers
• “Known
unknowns”
33
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible SolutionsPhoto provided under Creative Commons by David Villarreal
Fernández
34
18. 8/1/13
18
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible SolutionsPhoto provided under Creative Commons by David Villarreal
Fernández
35
An expert engineer can dissemble it
and re-assemble it and be able to drive
out of the garage.
Over and over, again.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
• Large
number
of
interac1ng
parts
• Interac1ons
are
not
always
predictable
• Behavior
of
the
system
cannot
be
predicted
based
on
behavior
of
the
parts
• The
history
of
the
system
effects
current
performance
• Cause
and
effect
can
only
be
perceived
in
retrospect
36
19. 8/1/13
19
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
37
Photo provided under Creative Commons by wka
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Implica1ons
of
Complex
Systems
• You
cannot
determinis1cally
predict
how
the
system
will
react
to
a
given
s1mulus
• You
can
only
understand
the
system
in
retrospect
– But
the
understanding
is
illusory
• Solu1ons
cannot
be
imposed
because
there
are
simply
too
many
unknowns
• Therefore,
complex
organiza1ons
are
best
led
through
a
probe-‐sense-‐respond
loop
38
20. 8/1/13
20
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
39
Though
most
modern
organiza1onal
semngs
are
complex,
most
managers
and
leaders
view
organiza1ons
as
complicated.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
40
This
is
a
big
problem.
21. 8/1/13
21
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
You
now
have
the
wrong
filter.
With
the
wrong
filter,
anything
you
do
to
improve
things
will
actually
make
them
worse.
41
Photograph provided under Creative Commons License by Veni Markovski
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
In
trea1ng
organiza1onal
situa1ons
as
complex:
• Experts
dominate
the
discovery
process
• This
leads
to
– Entrenched
thinking
– Analysis
paralysis
42
22. 8/1/13
22
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
This,
in
turn,
leads
to
the
Treadmill
of
Compounding
Complica7on
43
New
Processes
and
Structure
Difficult
for
People
to
Follow
Process
Not
Followed
Perceived
Lack
of
Control
Start
Here
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
You
are
now
buried
in
complica1on
that
needs
to
be
that
much
more
‘managed.’
44
23. 8/1/13
23
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
45
Many
organiza1onal
situa1ons
are
inherently
complex.
They
cannot
be
regulated
by
tradi1onal
management
approaches.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Complex organizational situations
call for a different approach to
leadership and management…
46
A Well Designed
Environment
Photo provided under Creative Commons by Eugene Chan
24. 8/1/13
24
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
47
…from managing for control
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
48
…to designing for emergence
25. 8/1/13
25
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
In
an
agile
organiza1on,
the
job
of
leadership
and
management
shiHs
from
managing
individuals
and
teams
to
managing,
and
con1nuously
improving,
the
organiza1onal
environments
in
which
individuals
and
teams
operate.
49
Agile
Teams
Organizational
Environment
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
50
There
is
a
sensing,
and
there
is
responding
aspect
to
this.
26. 8/1/13
26
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
51
Sensing
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
The
Sensing
Elements
52
Organiza1on
Structures
Organiza1on
Culture
Leadership
Styles
27. 8/1/13
27
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
The
Sensing
Elements
53
The organizational
structures, rules and
policies which facilitate
how work gets done and
how results get
produced.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
The
Sensing
Elements
54
Collectively held beliefs,
values and assumptions
which determine how
people think and how
they behave.
28. 8/1/13
28
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
The
Sensing
Elements
55
How leaders and
managers lead, inspire,
direct and motivate
others.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Improvement
in
All
Three
Areas
is
the
Job
of
Leadership
and
Management
56
Organiza1on
Structures
Organiza1on
Culture
Leadership
Styles
29. 8/1/13
29
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
57
Agile
Team
EXAMPLE:
Agile
Team
Sensing:
Start
with
the
team…
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
58
Agile
Team
What
challenges
and
blocks
does
it
run
into?
What
behaviors
do
they
exhibit?
Blocks,
impediments,
bad behaviors,
inefficiencies
30. 8/1/13
30
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
59
Agile
Team
These
are
the
ques1ons
posed
by
a
Management
Team.
Blocks,
impediments,
bad behaviors,
inefficiencies
Management
Team
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Rather
than
simply
making
the
problem
go
away,
we
want
to
engage
in
a
form
of
systemic
inquiry.
Systemic Inquiry:
Agile
Teams
Blocks,
impediments,
bad behaviors,
inefficiencies
Management
Team
How can we better understand, not
just the presenting problem or
challenge, but the underlying
dynamics which that problem or
challenge manifests?
31. 8/1/13
31
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
A
Sensing
Elements
frame
helps
us
conduct
such
a
systemic
inquiry
by
helping
us
frame
deeper
ques1ons
about
the
organiza1on.
Systemic Inquiry:
Agile
Teams
Blocks,
impediments,
bad behaviors,
inefficiencies
Agile
Enablement
Team
How
might
our
thinking
and
leadership
styles
be
impeding
the
capacity
for
effec=ve
agile
delivery,
product
development,
and
organiza=onal
agility?
What
assump=ons,
collec=vely
held
beliefs,
or
percep=ons
of
our
values
are
blocking
our
ability
to
imagine
new
ways
of
working?
What
org.
structures,
rules,
or
policies,
which
once
may
have
been
needed,
have
now
become
boClenecks
to
effec=ve
agile
delivery?
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
62
This constitutes a form of deep
organizational sensing.
32. 8/1/13
32
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
63
Responding
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
A
shiH
from
managing
through
direc1ng,
mo1va1ng
and
coordina1ng
people…
64
People
33. 8/1/13
33
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Organizational
Environment
…
to
managing
through
design
of
environments.
65
People
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
It
can
be
helpful
to
use
our
organiza1onal
sensing
lens
to
orient
our
design
thinking.
66
Organiza1on
Structures
Organiza1on
Culture
Leadership
Styles
34. 8/1/13
34
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
A
Simple
Example:
We
Reflect
On
and
Improve
How
we
Work
through
Retrospec1ves
67
Photo provided under Creative Commons by Improve IT
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
68
How might the design of the
organizational environment facilitate
the emergence of this capability?
35. 8/1/13
35
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
69
Organiza1on
Structures
• Organiza1onal
support
people
gathering
to
reflect:
• Team
spaces
• Collabora1ve
technology
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
70
Organiza1on
Structures
• Organiza1onal
support
people
gathering
to
reflect:
• Team
spaces
• Collabora1ve
technology
Organiza1on
Culture
• It
is
safe
to
admit
failures
• There
is
a
constant
drive
for
improvement
36. 8/1/13
36
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
71
Organiza1on
Structures
• Organiza1onal
support
people
gathering
to
reflect:
• Team
spaces
• Collabora1ve
technology
Organiza1on
Culture
• It
is
safe
to
admit
failures
• There
is
a
constant
drive
for
improvement
Leadership
Style
• Leaders
publicly
reflect
on
their
own
successes
and
failures
–
and
improving
• Leaders
demonstrate
ac1ve
learning
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
72
Notice how little management (in the
traditional, control sense of the term)
there is.
37. 8/1/13
37
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
73
Environment Design is a
management methodology that
facilitates emergence of particular,
desired organizational capabilities.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Environment
Design
as
a
Methodology
for
Building
Organiza1onal
Capability
74
Outmaneuver
the
compe11on
by
implemen1ng
high-‐value
product
features
faster
than
they
do
Goal
38. 8/1/13
38
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Environment
Design
as
a
Methodology
for
Building
Organiza1onal
Capability
75
Outmaneuver
the
compe11on
by
implemen1ng
high-‐value
product
features
faster
than
they
do
Goal
We
are
able
to
experiment
with
new
product
ideas,
quickly
iden1fying
what
is
worth
inves1ng
in
and
what
is
not
Capability
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Environment
Design
as
a
Methodology
for
Building
Organiza1onal
Capability
76
Outmaneuver
the
compe11on
by
implemen1ng
high-‐value
product
features
faster
than
they
do
Goal
We
are
able
to
experiment
with
new
product
ideas,
quickly
iden1fying
what
is
worth
inves1ng
in
and
what
is
not
Capability
• Leaders
support
experimenta1on
<L>
• Fast
failures
are
celebrated
<C>
• Org
structures
facilitate
experimenta1on
<S>
• Lean
startup
prac1ces
are
used
<C>
Environment
Design
39. 8/1/13
39
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
77
Environment Design recognizes that
an important dimension of
organizational life is complex, and
therefore cannot be regulated in the
usual manner.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
78
Such an approach to organizational
management calls for something more
than just tactical or strategic
leadership.
It calls for what Bill Joiner and Stephen
Josephs call catalytic leadership.
40. 8/1/13
40
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
79
Complicated
vs.
Complex
Complex
The relationship between cause and
effect can only be perceived in retrospect
(most organizational situations)
-> Catalytic, experimental methods work best
(allow the path forward to reveal itself)
-> Follow emergent practices:
1. Probe
2. Sense
3. Respond
- But watch for command/control, imposing
order
MODEL:
Cataly1c
Leadership
From:
Joyner
&
Josephs
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
• Each
level
reflects
a
greater
capacity
to
deal
with
complexity
and
rapid
change.
• Each
level
builds
upon,
but
expands
the
range
of
mental
and
leadership
capability
over
the
levels
below
80
Three
Levels
of
Leadership
Agility*
Expert Achiever Catalyst
* Bill Joiner, Stephen Josephs, Leadership Agility: Five Levels of Mastery for Anticipating and Initiating Change.
41. 8/1/13
41
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Expert
81
View
of
Leadership
Agility
in
Pivotal
Conversa=ons
Agility
in
Leading
Teams
Agility
in
Leading
Organiza=onal
Change
Tactical, problem
solving orientation
Believes that leaders
are respected and
followed by others
because of their
Authority and
Expertise.
Style is either to
strongly assert opinions
or to hold back to
accommodate others.
May swing back from
one style to the other,
particularly for different
relationships. Tends to
avoid giving or
requesting feedback.
More of a supervisor
than a manager.
Creates a group of
individuals rather than a
team. Work with direct
reports is primarily one-
on-one. Too caught up
in the details of own
work to lead in a
strategic manner.
Organizational
initiatives focus
primarily on incremental
improvements inside
unit boundaries with
little attention to
stakeholders.
Bill Joiner, Stephen Josephs, Leadership Agility: Five Levels of Mastery for Anticipating and Initiating Change
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Achiever
82
View
of
Leadership
Agility
in
Pivotal
Conversa=ons
Agility
in
Leading
Teams
Agility
in
Leading
Organiza=onal
Change
Strategic, outcome
orientation
Believes that leaders
motivate others by
making it challenging
and satisfying to
contribute to larger
objectives.
Primarily Assertive or
accommodating with
some ability to
compensate with the
less preferred style.
Will accept or even
initiate feedback, if
helpful in achieving
desired outcomes.
Operates like a full-
fledged manager.
Meetings to discuss
important strategic or
organizational issues
are often orchestrated
to gain buy-in to own
views.
Organizational
initiatives include
analysis of external
environment.
Strategies to gain
stakeholder buy-in
range from one-way
communication to
soliciting input.
Bill Joiner, Stephen Josephs, Leadership Agility: Five Levels of Mastery for Anticipating and Initiating Change
42. 8/1/13
42
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Catalyst
83
View
of
Leadership
Agility
in
Pivotal
Conversa=ons
Agility
in
Leading
Teams
Agility
in
Leading
Organiza=onal
Change
Visionary, facilitative
orientation
Believes that leaders
articulate an innovative,
inspiring vision and
bring together the right
people to transform the
vision into reality.
Leaders empower
others and actively
facilitate their
development.
Adept at balancing
assertive and
accommodating styles
as needed in particular
situations. Likely to
articulate and question
underlying
assumptions.
Genuinely interested in
learning from divers
viewpoints. Proactive
in seeking and utilizing
feedback.
Intent upon creating a
highly participative
team. Acts as team
leader and facilitator.
Models and seeks open
exchange of views on
difficult issues.
Empowers direct
reports. Uses team
development as a
vehicle for leadership
development.
Organizational
initiatives often include
development of a
culture that promotes
teamwork, participation,
and empowerment.
Proactive engagement
with diverse
stakeholders reflects a
belief that input
increases the quality of
decisions, not just buy-
in.
From Bill Joiner, Stephen Josephs, Leadership Agility: Five Levels of Mastery for Anticipating and Initiating Change, p. 8.
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
84
“During the early 1980s, a series of academic studies produced
statistically significant correlations, showing that the capacities
managers develop at the more advanced stages carry over into
the way they exercise leadership. These studies also found that, in
the great majority of cases, catalytic managers are more effective
than conventional managers.
Why? Because they are more strategic in their thinking, more
collaborative, more proactive in seeking feedback, more effective
in resolving conflicts, more active in developing subordinates, and
more likely to redefine problems to capitalize on the connections
between them.”
Correlation
of
Stages
to
Managerial
Styles
Source: Bill Joiner, Stephen Josephs, Leadership Agility: Five Levels of Mastery for Anticipating and Initiating Change, pp. viii-ix
Correla1on
of
Stages
to
Management
Styles
43. 8/1/13
43
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Agile Leadership Principles
…
Why
Do
We
Care?
• There
is
a
rela1vely
low
level
of
cataly1c
behavior
demonstrated
by
managers
– 45%
Expert
– 35%
Achiever
– 5-‐10%
Catalyst
• And
yet
there
is
an
increasing
need
for
catalyst
leadership
in
modern
organiza1ons
85
Copyright © 2012 Big Visible Solutions
Conclusions
86
• Leaders
and
managers
need
to
think
beyond
the
team
and
facilitate
the
emergence
of
a
broader
capacity
for
organiza7onal
agility.
• Such
a
capacity
cannot
be
managed
or
regulated
into
existence;
such
a
capacity
can
only
really
be
catalyzed.
• By
focusing
on
the
broader
organiza1onal
environment,
managers
find
important
design
points
of
leverage.
• Managing
through
the
design
of
environments
creates
condi1ons
that
favor
the
emergence
of
par1cular,
desired
organiza1onal
capabili1es
and,
therefore,
behaviors.
• Managing
for
the
emergence
of
organiza1onal
agility
is
an
inherently
complex
task,
calling
for
a
cataly7c
approach
to
leadership
and
management.