Corporate presentation for Global Cobalt Corp. (TSX.V:GCO) Global Cobalt Corporation (TSX.V:GCO) is a publicly traded Canadian resource company that was founded in 2007 to take advantage of the global transformation that is occurring in the strategic metals sector of the mining industry. Through a combination of acquisitions and internally developed businesses, Global Cobalt exploits market opportunities as they emerge in various sectors of the strategic metals sector with emphasis on those metals, such as cobalt, used in the rechargeable battery space.

1. DEVELOPING
VALUE
Global
Cobalt
Corp.
“Powered
by
Cobalt”
TSXV:GCO,
OTCBB:GLBCF,
FRA:3P0

2. CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Regarding
Forward-­‐Looking
Statements
This
presentaJon
includes
certain
“forward-­‐looking
statements”
and
“forward-­‐looking
informaJon”
within
the
meaning
of
applicable
securiJes
laws,
concerning
the
business,
operaJons
and
financial
performance
and
condiJon
of
the
Company.
All
statements,
other
than
statements
of
historical
fact,
are
forward-­‐looking
statements.
Forward-­‐looking
statements
are
frequently,
but
not
always,
idenJfied
by
words
such
as
“plans”,
“expects”,
“anJcipates”,
“believes”,
“intends”,
“esJmates”,
“potenJal”,
“possible”
and
similar
expressions,
or
statements
that
events,
condiJons
or
results
“will”,
“may”,
“could”,
or
“should”
occur
or
be
achieved.
Forward-­‐looking
statements
contained
in
this
presentaJon
include
statements
with
respect
to:
expectaJons
regarding
the
potenJal
mineralizaJon
and
geological
merits
of
the
Company’s
projects,
including
the
Karakul
Project
and
the
Werner
Lake
Project;
the
Company’s
goals
regarding
development
of
the
Karakul
Project
and
regarding
raising
capital
and
conducJng
further
exploraJon
and
development
of
its
projects;
the
Company’s
proposed
plans
for
advancing
its
projects,
including
drilling
and
other
exploraJon
work;
expectaJons
regarding
the
conJnuity
of
mineral
deposits,
including
in
relaJon
to
adjacent
or
other
properJes
(including
producing
or
past-­‐producing
properJes)
that
are
in
the
vicinity
or
same
region
as
the
Company’s
projects;
expectaJons
regarding
any
environmental
issues
that
may
affect
planned
or
future
exploitaJon
and
exploraJon
programs;
mineral
exploitaJon
and
exploraJon
program
cost
esJmates;
statements
with
respect
to
the
future
price
of
cobalt
and
other
metals;
Jming
and
compleJon
of
geological
studies
and
reports;
receipt
and
Jming
of
the
necessary
exploitaJon
permits
and
other
third
party
approvals;
and
government
regulaJon
of
mineral
exploraJon
and
development
operaJons
in
Russia.
EsJmates
of
mineral
resources
and
mineral
reserves
may
also
consJtute
forward-­‐looking
statements
and
informaJon
in
that
they
represent
esJmates
of
mineralizaJon
that
may
be
encountered
if
mining
is
commenced,
and/or
economic
viability
of
such
mineralizaJon.
Forward-­‐looking
statements
involve
various
risks
and
uncertainJes.
There
can
be
no
assurance
that
such
statements
will
prove
to
be
accurate,
and
actual
results
and
future
events
could
differ
materially
from
those
anJcipated
in
such
statements.
Important
factors
that
could
cause
actual
results
to
differ
materially
from
our
expectaJons
include
the
uncertainJes
involving
the
need
for
addiJonal
financing
to
explore
and
develop
properJes
and
availability
of
financing
in
the
debt
and
capital
markets;
uncertainJes
involved
in
the
interpretaJon
of
drilling
results
and
geological
tests
and
the
esJmaJon
of
reserves
and
resources;
the
need
for
cooperaJon
of
government
agencies
and
naJve
groups
in
the
development
and
operaJon
of
properJes;
the
need
to
obtain
permits
and
governmental
approvals;
risks
of
construcJon
and
mining
projects
such
as
accidents,
equipment
breakdowns,
bad
weather,
non-­‐compliance
with
environmental
and
permit
requirements,
unanJcipated
variaJon
in
geological
structures,
ore
grades
or
recovery
rates;
unexpected
cost
increases;
fluctuaJons
in
metal
prices
and
currency
exchange
rates;
the
impact
of
economic
sancJons
on
companies
conducJng
business
in
Russia;
and
other
risk
and
uncertainJes
disclosed
in
reports
and
documents
filed
by
the
Company
with
applicable
securiJes
regulatory
authoriJes
from
Jme
to
Jme.
The
forward-­‐looking
statements
made
herein
reflect
the
Company’s
beliefs,
opinions
and
projecJons
on
the
date
the
statements
are
made.
Except
as
required
by
law,
the
Company
assumes
no
obligaJon
to
update
the
forward-­‐looking
statements
of
beliefs,
opinions,
projecJons,
or
other
factors,
should
they
change.
Regarding
Historical
Resources
Note
that
the
C1
and
C2
resource
esJmates
shown
are
historical
in
nature
and
do
not
use
categories
defined
in
Canadian
NaJonal
Instrument
43-­‐101
Standards
of
Disclosure
for
Mineral
Projects
(“NI
43-­‐101”)
and
accordingly
are
not
compliant
with
NI
43-­‐101
or
Canadian
InsJtute
of
Mining,
Metallurgy
and
Petroleum
(“CIM”)
standards.
[The
exact
date
of
these
es=mates
is
unknown].
Historical
resource
esJmates
are
based
on
the
Russian
reserve
system
and
based
primarily
on
trench
and
prospecJng
samples
only.
These
resources
are
considered
historical
in
nature
under
NI
43-­‐101
and
a
qualified
person
under
NI
43-­‐101
has
not
done
sufficient
work
to
classify
the
historical
esJmate
as
current
mineral
resources.
The
Company
is
not
treaJng
the
historical
esJmate
as
current
mineral
resources.
Regarding
Mineral
Reserve
and
Resource
Es=mates
Unless
otherwise
indicated,
all
reserve
and
resource
esJmates
included
in
this
presentaJon
have
been
prepared
in
accordance
with
NI
43-­‐101
and
CIM
standards.
Canadian
standards,
including
NI
43-­‐101,
differ
significantly
from
the
requirements
of
the
United
States
SecuriJes
and
Exchange
Commissions
,
and
reserve
and
resource
informaJon
in
this
presentaJon
may
not
be
comparable
to
similar
informaJon
disclosed
by
U.S.
companies.
In
parJcular,
and
without
limiJng
the
generality
of
the
foregoing,
the
term
“resource”
does
not
equate
to
the
term
“‘reserves”.
Under
U.S.
standards,
mineralizaJon
may
not
be
classified
as
a
“reserve”
unless
the
determinaJon
has
been
made
that
the
mineralizaJon
could
be
economically
and
legally
produced
or
extracted
at
the
Jme
the
reserve
determinaJon
is
made.
Qualified
Person
Mr.
Paul
Sarjeant,
P.
Geo.,
is
a
Qualified
Person
as
defined
by
NI
43-­‐101.
Mr.
Sarjeant
is
the
Company’s
Vice
President
ExploraJon,
and,
unless
otherwise
indicated,
has
prepared
or
supervised
the
preparaJon
of
the
technical
informaJon
contained
in
this
presentaJon
and/or
reviewed
and
approved
such
disclosure.
For
more
informaJon,
see
the
individual
technical
reports
and
news
releases
available
under
the
Company’s
profile
at
www.sedar.com
2
All
monetary
amounts
in
this
presentaJon
are
in
Canadian
dollars
unless
otherwise
indicated.

3. STRATEGY OVERVIEW
Explore market
opportunities as they
emerge in various sectors
of the strategic metals
sector with emphasis on
those metals, such as
cobalt, used in the
rechargeable battery
space.
3
3

4. MARKET CAPITALIZATION
4
Global
Cobalt
Corp.
TSX-­‐V:GCO
Issued
&
Outstanding
88,621,588
Warrants
12,191,220
OpJons
5,205,000
Fully
Diluted
106,017,808
52
Week
High/Low
$0.27/$0.035
Market
Cap.
$6M
Warrants
Expiry
Date
Issued
Price
Warrant
Descrip=on
Dec.
30,
2014
80,761
$1.50
FT
Private
Placement
Sept.
19,
2015
1,737,000
$0.073
Private
Placement
Nov.
6,
2015
4,256,060
$0.070
Private
Placement
Jan.
27,
2017
6,117,399
$0.35
Private
Placement
Stock
Op=ons
Expiry
Date
Issued
Price
Value
CAD
$
Nov.
30,
2014
350,000
$0.34
$119,000
Jan.
15,
2015
300,000
$0.30
$90,000
Dec.
18,
2018
400,000
$0.24
$96,000
Dec.
18,
2018
4,155,000
$0.19
$789,450
IMHL
30%
MANAGEMENT
10%
INSTITUTIONAL
10%
RETAIL
50%
Ownership
Structure

5. “POWERED BY COBALT”
panel
technology
5
LOW
PRICE
+
SUPPLY
RISK
+
GROWING
DEMAND
=
OPPORTUNITY
IN
COBALT
Renewable
Energy
• Solar
• Wind
generaJon
(turbines)
• Energy
storage
Aerospace
Technology
&
Hardened
Steel
• Jet
engine
turbines
&
military
technology
• Wear
resistant
&
high
strength
steel
alloys
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.
• High
speed
steels
• Magnets
Hybrid
Electric
Vehicle
(HEV)
Baueries
• EssenJal
component
in
growing
rechargeable
bauery
sector
• Diminishes
demand
for
fossil
fuels
and
reduces
air
polluJon
Digital
Revolution and
Electronics
• Mobile phones &
smartphones
• Computers & other
electronic goods
including iPods &
iPads
• Integrated circuits 5

6. COBALT & RECHARGEABLE
BATTERIES
60%
Cobalt
by
Weight
10-­‐20%
Cobalt
by
Weight
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.
6
FACT:
Cobalt
chemicals
are
a
criJcal
component
for
rechargeable
baueries
• The
rechargeable
bauery
market
is
experiencing
rapid
growth
due
to
the
conJnued
proliferaJon
of
portable
electronic
devices.
• In
addiJon
the
emergence
of
electric
vehicles
is
anJcipated
to
further
boost
the
demand
for
cobalt
in
baueries
• Bauery
is
the
single
largest
use
of
cobalt
accounJng
for
42%
of
cobalt
demand
and
is
the
primary
driver
of
the
cobalt
market
LITHIUM
COBALT
BATTERIES:
Advanced,
Higher
Energy
Density,
Lighter
Is
Lithium
Cobalt
Oxide
(LCO)
Lithium
Nickel
Manganese
Cobalt
Oxide
(NMC)
Lithium
Nickel
Cobalt
Aluminum
Oxide
(NCA)
9%
Cobalt
by
Weight
By
the
Year
2020
COBALT
use
in
bauery
applicaJons
is
esJmated
to
be
greater
than
the
current
enJre
world
market
for
refined
cobalt
Source:
Roskill

7. DRIVING THE DEMAND
7
Ba`ery
Usage
Accounts
for
42%
of
Cobalt
Demand
Nickel-­‐Metal
Hydride
Ba`eries
Lithium-­‐Ion
Ba`eries
Bauery
Usage,
42%
1-­‐4kg
of
Cobalt
in
a
Car
Bauery
2-­‐8kg
of
Cobalt
in
a
Car
Bauery
Cobalt
is
recognized
as
strategically
important
by
both
the
USA
and
EU
as
it
is
criJcal
to
a
number
metallurgical
and
chemical
products
and
is
suscepJble
to
supply
concerns
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.
Super
Alloys,
19%
Other,
39%
61%
of
mined
cobalt
is
sourced
from
the
geo-­‐
poliJcally
unstable
D.R.
Congo
China
refines
43%
of
the
world’s
cobalt
15%
15%
Cobalt
by
60%
Weight
60%
Cobalt
by
Weight
Cobalt
Demand
Source:
Roskill

8. 16/05/2014
PRICED AT HISTORIC LOWS
8
Price forecasts…
Roskill price forecasts to 2018 ($/lb)
25
20
15
10
5
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
MB prices Roskill forecasts
Source: Roskill
! An export ban on DRC
concentrates
! New mining code in DRC
! Power disruptions in Africa
! Lower than expected
demand in key sectors and
applications
! World economic markets
falter
Historical cobalt prices…
Cobalt free market in warehouse monthly average prices (US$ per lb)
Jan-97
Sep-97
May-98
Jan-99
Sep-99
May-00
Jan-01
Sep-01
May-02
Jan-03
Sep-03
May-04
Jan-05
Sep-05
May-06
Jan-07
Sep-07
May-08
Jan-09
Sep-09
May-10
Jan-11
Sep-11
May-12
Jan-13
Sep-13
May-14
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
Source: Metal Bulletin
Low Price High Price
Source:
Roskill
presentaJon
delivered
at
the
Cobalt
Development
InsJtute
Cobalt
Conference
May
21st,
2014

9. THE PROJECT PORTFOLIO
9
“Develop
ExisJng
Resources
and
Expand
Our
Asset
Porvolio
&
Footprint
in
the
Strategic
Metals
Sector,
Regionally
and
Worldwide”
Karakul
Cobalt
Project
Altai
Sister
Projects
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.
Werner
Lake
Project
Iron
Creek
Project

10. Core
from
Werner
Drill
Rig
at
Werner
10
WERNER LAKE – PRIMARY
COBALT IN CANADA
• The
Werner
Lake
Project
consists
of
the
historic
Werner
Lake
and
Werner
Lake
West
cobalt-­‐copper-­‐gold
mines
• The
project
lies
within
the
Werner
Lake
Belt,
that
also
hosts
the
historic
Gordon
Lake
copper-­‐nickel
mine
•
The
present
day
Werner
Lake
Project
hosts
the
two
former
cobalt
producers
and
several
other
auracJve
exploraJon
targets
• The
Werner
Lake
Mine
produced
146,386
lbs
of
cobalt
from
1940
to
1944
• The
Werner
Lake
West
Mine
produced
approximately
10,000
tonnes
of
cobalt
ore
between
1996
and
1997
under
the
direcJon
of
Canmine
Resources
CorporaJon
• Significant
opportunity
to
increase
exisJng
resource
with
planned
exploraJon
and
extension
program
Tonnes
Cobalt
(%)
Copper
(%)
Gold
(opt)
Proven
Reserves*
140,031
0.47
0.26
0.008
Probable
Reserves*
40,829
0.25
0.43
0.030
Total*
180,860
0.42
0.30
0.013
Indicated
Resources*
51,456
0.13
0.20
0.003
Inferred
Resources*
869,378
0.29
0.28
0.011
*The
historical
resource
esJmates
at
Werner
Lake
are
not
being
treated
as
a
mineral
reserve
or
mineral
resource.
Key
assumpJons,
parameters,
and
methods
used
to
prepare
the
historical
esJmates
are
not
known.
A
qualified
person
has
not
done
sufficient
work
to
classify
the
historical
esJmate
as
a
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve.
AddiJonal
drilling
and
tesJng
is
required
to
determine
a
current
classificaJon
as
a
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve.
The
Company
is
not
treaJng
the
historical
informaJon
as
a
current
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve
and
the
reader
is
cauJoned
to
not
rely
upon
this
data.
Please
refer
to
the
“Werner
Lake
Mineral
Belt
ProperJes
Technical
Report”
by
Gerald
Harper,
Ph.D.,
P.Geo.
(On),
dated
March
22,
2011
and
revised
June
23,
2011
as
filed
on
SEDAR.

11. 11
LOCATION OF MINERAL
DEPOSTS IN THE WERNER LAKE BELT
Werner Lake Mine
Gordon Lake Mine
Norpax
Deposit East Werner
Lake
Granitoid Rocks (undivided)
Mafic Gneiss & ultramafic-mafic intrusions
Metasedimentary migmatite assemblage
Werner-Rex Lake Fault
Magmatic Ni-Cu-Cr-PGE deposits
Co-Cu and Co skarnoid deposits
Remobilised sulphide deposits
0 4
km
Location of Mineral Deposits in the Werner Lake Belt

12. 12
WERNER LAKE MINERAL BELT
PHASE I & II DRILL RESULTS
Completed:
• 1.21%
cobalt
over
12.30
metres
• High-­‐grade
intercept
of
over
12%
cobalt
over
0.90
metres
• High-­‐grade
intercepts
associated
with
anomalous
Cu,
Ni
and
Au
values
• Over
12%
Co
returned
in
hole
WL10-­‐004
showing
a
zone
of
more
than
5%
sulphides
in
peridoJte
with
porJons
that
carry
from
5
to
45%
sulphides
• Discovery
of
high
grade
eastern
extension
of
800
metres
from
Werner
Lake
cobalt
deposit
• 7,565m
of
drilling
in
31
holes
over
the
winter
and
spring
of
2009-­‐2010
Next
Steps:
• Evaluate
Werner
Lake
with
a
goal
to
resume
the
work
necessary
to
finalize
the
already
iniJated
NI
43-­‐101
compliant
resource
report

13. 13
SIMPLIFIED GEOLOGY, MINE SITES
AND SHOWINGS
Werner Lake West
Metasedimentary Rocks
Granitoid Intrusions
Tonalite-Trondhjemite-
Granodiorite Intrusions
Migmatites
Ultramafic Rocks
Old Mine Site
Amphibolite & Alteration
Roads
Fault
Co-Cu-Au Mineralisation
0 250
km
Limit of Mapping
Limit of Mapping
Werner Lake Project
Simplified Geology, Mine Sites and Showings
East Zone

14. West East
0.028, 0.507
3.3
0.120, 0.560
1.4
0.05, 0.46
0.80
0.011, 0.382
10-030
10-013 10-017
10-022
10-032
10-024
*The
historical
resource
esJmates
at
Werner
Lake
are
not
being
treated
as
a
mineral
reserve
or
mineral
resource.
Key
assumpJons,
parameters,
and
methods
used
to
prepare
the
historical
esJmates
are
not
known.
A
qualified
person
has
not
done
sufficient
work
to
classify
the
historical
esJmate
as
a
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve.
AddiJonal
drilling
and
tesJng
is
required
to
determine
a
current
classificaJon
as
a
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve.
The
Company
is
not
treaJng
the
historical
informaJon
as
a
current
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve
and
the
reader
is
cauJoned
to
not
rely
upon
this
data.
Please
refer
to
the
“Werner
Lake
Mineral
Belt
ProperJes
Technical
Report”
by
Gerald
Harper,
Ph.D.,
P.Geo.
(On),
dated
March
22,
2011
and
revised
June
23,
2011
as
filed
on
SEDAR.
14
WERNER LAKE MINERAL BELT
IDEALIZED LONGITUDINAL SECTION
350 m
150 m
50 m
Werner Lake Idealised Longitudinal Section
(Looking North)
200m
250 m
Surface
Werner West Zone
Old Mine Site
Historic Resource Area
Recent Drill Hole 10-019
1.21, 0.22
12.3
09-001
10-005
09-002
10-004
10-003
10-006
10-008
10-012
10-007
10-02310-019
10-020
10-011
10-009
10-010
10-028
10-018
10-021
10-025 10-027
10-026
10-015
10-016
10-029
10-033
10-031B
10-014
0.14, 0.38
3.1
0.124, 4.346
1.2
0.04, 0.20
1.9
0.012, 0.323
0.4
0.102, 0.266
2,4
0.10, 0.37
4.3
0.9
0.053, 0.159
1.2
0.122, 0.241
0.9
0.377, 0.135
1.6
NSR
NSR
NSR
0.011, 0.431
1.3
0.020, 0.234
0.9
NSR
0.025, 2.43
4.9
0.289, 0.096
4.7
0.288, 0.156
1.1
NSR
NSR
NSR
0.279, 0.085
2.7
0.039, 0.422
1.4
0.007, 0.142
1.0
0.017, 0.274
3.0
0.196, 0.145
2.8
NSR
% Co, % Cu
m

15. 15
WERNER LAKE
GOALS, PROJECTIONS &
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
TASK
STATUS
FUNDING
REQUIREMENT
Complete
NI
43-­‐01
Resource
EsJmaJon
Q4
2014
$50,000
ValidaJon,
Infill
&
Expansion
Drilling
• RecommendaJon
of
1,800m
Q4
2014/Q1
2015
$450,000
Metallurgical
Sampling/Preliminary
Test
Work
Q1
2015
$50,000
-­‐
$75,000
Preliminary
Economic
Assessment
(PEA)
Q2
2015
$50,000
-­‐
$100,000
Environmental
Assessment
Work
Q2/Q3
2015
TBD
Meet
IFC
Performance
Standards
requirements
• Environmental
&
Social
Impact
Assessment
TBD
TBD

16. “The
addi)on
of
Iron
Creek
into
our
cobalt
project
por8olio
is
exci)ng
and
diversifies
our
project
mix
at
a
)me
when
cobalt
is
becoming
increasingly
important
in
the
baAery
sector.”
16
A FOOTHOLD IN THE
FAMED IDAHO COBALT BELT
• The
Iron
Creek
project
provides
Global
Cobalt
with
a
foothold
in
the
Idaho
Cobalt
Belt,
the
most
prolific
belt
of
cobalt
mineralisaJon
in
the
United
States.
• Consists
of
seven
patented
mining
claims
of
approximately
118
acres
located
in
Lemhi
County
about
26
miles
southwest
of
the
town
of
Salmon,
Idaho.
• Discovered
in
the
1940’s
as
a
possible
iron
deposit,
past
work
by
previous
operators
idenJfied
several
zones
of
cobalt-­‐copper
mineralisaJon.
• Extensive
drilling,
sampling,
and
geologic
work
was
completed
on
two
of
the
most
promising
areas.
• Numerous
other
exploraJon
targets
have
been
idenJfied
on
the
property
that
have
yet
to
be
fully
evaluated.
Entrance
to
ExisJng
Adit
at
Iron
Creek

17. 17
IRON CREEK PROJECT
LOCATION
Salmon River
Montana
Idaho
Lemhi
County
Custer County
Hwy 75
Hwy 93
Hwy 28
Hwy 93
Challis
Macay
Bear Track
Blackbird
Yellowjacket
Salmon
Cobalt
0 20
Miles
Iron Creek
Project
Idaho Cobalt
Project
Idaho USA

18. 18
IRON CREEK PROJECT
HIGHLIGHTS
• The
Iron
Creek
project
provides
Global
Cobalt
with
a
foothold
in
the
Idaho
Cobalt
Belt,
the
most
prolific
belt
of
cobalt
mineralisaJon
in
the
United
States.
• Approximately
30,000
feet
of
diamond
drilling
and
1,500
feet
of
underground
drixing
has
been
completed
exploring
the
project
by
previous
operators.
• Historic
literature
defines
"two
disJnct
lenses
of
cobalt
mineralizaJon."
• The
first
lens
esJmated
to
contain
1,050,000
tons
grading
0.61%
cobalt
and
0.3%
copper
and
having
a
strike
length
of
about
750
feet.
• A
second
lens
of
high-­‐grade
cobalt
mineralizaJon
of
229,000
tons
extends
for
600
feet
of
strike
length,
is
deeper
than
the
first
lens,
and
averages
about
0.48%
Co
and
0.24%
Cu.
• Historic
met
work
indicates
that
the
project
has
low
arsenic
levels
that
disJnguishes
the
project
from
others
in
the
belt
•
A
posiJve
as
it
make
potenJal
process
handling
easier
and
less
costly
*The
historical
resource
esJmates
at
the
Iron
Creek
Project
are
not
being
treated
as
a
mineral
reserve
or
mineral
resource.
Key
assumpJons,
parameters,
and
methods
used
to
prepare
the
historical
esJmates
are
not
known.
A
qualified
person
has
not
done
sufficient
work
to
classify
the
historical
esJmate
as
a
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve.
AddiJonal
drilling
and
tesJng
is
required
to
determine
a
current
classificaJon
as
a
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve.
The
Company
is
not
treaJng
the
historical
informaJon
as
a
current
mineral
resource
or
mineral
reserve
and
the
reader
is
cauJoned
to
not
rely
upon
this
data

19. 19
IRON CREEK PROPERTY
GEOLOGICAL COMPILATION
Geological Compilation with Drill Holes
Quartzite
Argillite
Iron Creek Property
Argillite
Quartzite
No Name Zone
0 500
feet
Underground Workings
Drill Hole
Geological Contact
Limits of Sulphide Zone
Tertiary Challis Volcanics
Proterozoic Yellowjacket Fm
Mineralisation
Modified from Ristorcelli 1988
50 W 40 W 30 W 20 W 10 W

20. 20
IRON CREEK
GOALS, PROJECTIONS &
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
TASK
STATUS
FUNDING
REQUIREMENT
(Es=mated)
CompilaJon
of
historic
data
into
Technical
Report
Q4
2014/Q1
2015
$100,000
Geological
Analysis
with
Supervision
• Enhance
the
understanding
of
the
geology
and
possible
mineralizaJon
Q1
2015
$100,000
Geophysical
Survey
• Airborne
• Ground
Q1
2015
$250,000
Diamond
Drilling
• IniJal
recommendaJon
of
+/-­‐
7,000m
to
replicate
historical
drilling
work
effort
Q2
2015
$1,750,000

21. THE ALTAI: A PRO-MINING
REGION
KARAKUL,
Altai
Republic
Kazakhstan
Mongolia
China
21
Altai
Republic,
Russia

22. THE KARAKUL COBALT
PROJECT
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.
• The
Karakul
deposit
is
a
hydrothermal
polymetallic
sulphide
deposit
with
elevated
content
of
cobalt,
copper,
tungsten,
bismuth
and
silver
• At
least
five
parallel
north-­‐
south
trending
structurally
controlled
sulphide
zones
are
delineated
by
historical
exploraJon
works,
including
the
Western,
Eastern,
Southwestern,
Northeastern
and
Malachite
Zones
22
The
Karakul
Camp

23. KARAKUL COBALT PROJECT
EARN-IN BY GLOBAL COBALT
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.
• Global
Cobalt
has
an
opJon
from
Imperial
Mining
Holding
Limited
(“IMHL”)
to
earn
100%
of
five
mineral
resource
projects
including
the
following:
• Karakul
Cobalt
Project
• Altai
Sister
properJes:
o Kuruozek;
Yantau;
Toshtuozek
and
Olendzhular
• Enables
greater
control
over
a
robust
project
porvolio
• Ability
to
leverage
itself
for
future
opportuniJes
• ConsideraJon
for
the
OpJon
in
the
ProperJes
includes:
• ObligaJon
to
incur
minimum
cumulaJve
expenditures
(up
to
$15M)
by
December
31,
2015
to
earn
up
to
a
74.9%
interest
in
the
properJes
23
Drill
Rig
at
Karakul

24. 24
YEAR ROUND ACCESS

25. KARAKUL ESTIMATES
25
The
current
size,
scale
and
potenJal
of
Karakul
makes
it
one
of
the
largest
Global Cobalt Corporation
NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Karakul Property and Adjacent Satellite Occurrences, Republic of Altai,
Russian Federation
known
primary
sources
of
the
strategic
metal
cobalt
globally.
Table 1.1: Summary of KarakulMineral Resource Statement – By Mineralised Zone, Cut-off Grade of 0.05% Cobalt Equivalent
WAI (June 30, 2014)
Western Zone
Resource
Classification Rock Type Tonnes
(Kt) Density Co
(%)
Bi
(%)
Cu
(%)
WO3
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
CoEq
(%)
Contained Metal CoEq (t)
Co (t) Bi (t) Cu (t) WO3 (t) Ag (t)
Indicated Oxide 981.01 2.56 0.024 0.068 0.269 0.096 0.87 0.257 230.88 664.67 2,640.99 940.51 0.85 2,525.87
Indicated Sulphide 17,156.33 2.96 0.113 0.057 0.362 0.056 3.13 0.318 19,449.50 9,753.72 62,146.50 9,629.98 53.71 54,480.66
Total Indicated Oxide+Sulphide 18,137.34 0.109 0.057 0.357 0.058 3.01 0.314 19,680.38 10,418.39 64,787.49 10,570.49 54.56 57,006.53
Inferred Oxide 17.82 2.56 0.007 0.001 0.067 0.037 0.00 0.069 1.19 0.22 12.00 6.57 0.00 12.34
Inferred Sulphide 2,915.63 3.11 0.096 0.107 0.325 0.053 4.48 0.326 2,792.06 3,131.74 9,467.09 1,532.24 13.07 9,509.79
Total Inferred Oxide+Sulphide 2,933.45 0.095 0.107 0.323 0.052 4.46 0.325 2,793.25 3,131.96 9,479.09 1,538.81 13.07 9,522.13
Eastern Zone
Inferred Oxide 147.26 2.56 0.034 0.061 0.211 0.102 3.08 0.261 49.54 89.36 311.16 150.84 0.45 384.91
Inferred Sulphide 5,971.10 2.89 0.078 0.066 0.218 0.045 1.80 0.237 4,636.72 3,939.70 13,001.47 2,690.20 10.73 14,167.84
Total Inferred Oxide+Sulphide 6,118.36 0.077 0.066 0.218 0.046 1.83 0.238 4,686.26 4,029.07 13,312.63 2,841.04 11.18 14,552.75
Notes:
1.Mineral Resources are not reserves until they have demonstrated economic viability based on a feasibility study or pre-feasibility study;
2.Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of any reserves;
3. Grade represents estimated contained metal in the ground and has not been adjusted for metallurgical recovery;
4. No additional mining factors applied and;
5. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
6. Co Equivalent calculated based on the following parameters assuming 100% recovery:
Metals US$/lb (USD$/0z) US$/tonne CoEq factor
Co 13.608 30,000 1
Cu 3.266 7,200 0.2400
Bi 9.888 21,800 0.7267
WO3 16.783 37,000 1.2333
Ag 20 0.6430 0.0021
Conversion Factor
lb/kg g/troy oz
2204.623 31.10348
Factor
22.0462

26. DISTRICT STRATEGY
26
• Proximity
of
Altai
Sister
ProperJes
to
Karakul
adds
the
possibility
of
addiJonal
resources
within
20km
of
Karakul
• Provides
significant
upside
to
the
creaJon
of
a
new
mining
jurisdicJon
in
the
Altai
region
• Kuruozek:
• Extension
of
the
Karakul
mineralizing
system
less
than
5km
from
the
adit
area
• Olendzhular
&
Toshtuozek:
• Excellent
tungsten
values
and
copper
mineralizaJon
exposed
in
surface
trenching
• Yantau:
• Preliminary
sampling
idenJfied
two
areas
of
anomalous
silver
over
Eastern
Zone
26

27. JUNIOR RESOURCE COMPANY
WITH MAJOR PARTNERS
Beijing
General
Research
Ins$tute
of
Mining
&
Metallurgy
(BGRIMM):
will
act
as
engineering,
procurement
and
construcJon
contractor
and
develop
a
project
assessment
for
markeJng
solely
in
the
China
Beijing
Easpring
Material
&
Technology
Co.
(Easpring):
SOEs
European
Bank
for
Reconstruc$on
and
Development
(EBRD):
is
a
current
shareholder
of
Global
Cobalt
and
will
conJnue
to
provide
vital
financial
and
poliJcal
input
The
Russian
Federa$on:
approved
the
foreign
bid
for
a
strategic
asset,
granted
an
open
pit
permit,
and
commiued
along
with
the
Altai
Republic
CDN
$440M
for
local
infrastructure
with
Karakul
as
the
pilot
project
27
“Con$nue
to
build
a
significant
enterprise
in
coopera$on
with
influen$al
and
strong
partners”
preliminary
off-­‐take
agreement
in
place
with
Easpring,
a
leading
specialized
supplier
of
cathode
material
for
lithium-­‐ion
baueries
to
industry
giants
such
as
Samsung,
Sony,
Panasonic,
and
BYD
CITIC
Merchant
Bank:
provide
relaJonships
into
CITIC
Capital
and
other
Chinese
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.

28. 28
FOCUSED & MOTIVATED
Ms.
Erin
Chu`er,
President
&
CEO,
Director
• President
and
CEO
of
Global
Cobalt;
founded
as
Puget
Ventures
in
2007.
• Prior
to
founding
Puget,
Ms.
Chuuer
worked
for
PlaJnum
Group
Metals,
Mag
Silver,
West
Timmins
Mining.
• ExperJse
in
management,
finance,
M&A,
strategy
and
operaJons.
• From
1992-­‐2001,
Ms.
Chuuer
held
various
posiJons
for
federal
and
provincial
government
officials,
including
the
Leader
of
the
federal
OpposiJon,
Minister
of
Indian
Affairs
and
Minister
of
Defence.
• Ms.
Chuuer
sits
on
the
Boards
of
the
Canadian
Taxpayer's
FederaJon
and
the
MacDonald
Laurier
InsJtute,
and
is
the
Chair
of
the
Canada
Eurasian
Russia
Business
AssociaJon,
Vancouver
Chapter.
• Ms.
Chuuer
was
recognized
with
a
2011
Business
in
Vancouver
“Top
40
Under
40”
achievement
award.
Mr.
Oleg
Scherbina,
Chief
Financial
Officer
• Mr.
Scherbina
is
a
financial
manager
with
experience
in
all
aspects
of
accounJng
and
financial
management.
• He
has
direct
experience
within
the
mining,
construcJon
and
oil/gas
sectors
and
has
been
involved
with
numerous
mining
companies,
including
Uranium
One,
Eureka
Mining
Plc
and
Bema
Gold
CorporaJon.
• Currently,
Mr.
Scherbina
is
responsible
for
the
development
of
the
accounJng
system
for
the
parent
company
and
subsidiary
companies
of
Global
Cobalt,
as
well
as
for
day-­‐to-­‐day
financial
operaJons
of
the
company,
including
contract
review,
payroll,
budgeJng
and
financial
control
development.
• Mr.
Scherbina
is
fluent
in
English,
Russian
and
Ukrainian
and
as
such
played
an
important
role
in
the
coordinaJon
and
execuJon
of
all
finance-­‐related
acJviJes
of
the
Bema
Gold
and
Eureka
Mining
operaJons
in
Russia,
while
also
managing
administraJve
and
human
resources
funcJons.
Mr.
Paul
Sarjeant,
P.Geo,
VP
Explora=on
• Mr.
Sarjeant,
P.
Geo,
has
extensive
exploraJon,
project
evaluaJon
and
acquisiJon
experience
both
in
Canada
and
internaJonally
and
has
developed
a
solid
background
in
company
management
through
various
execuJve
management
posiJons
with
several
publicly
traded
junior
resource
companies.
• Mr.
Sarjeant
began
his
career
with
Echo
Bay
Mines
Ltd.
as
a
project
geologist
working
on
projects
in
the
NWT,
Archean
greenstone
belts,
Lupin
Mine
peripheral
project,
and
skarn
properJes
in
BC
and
Ecuador.
• He
was
appointed
Senior
Geologist,
InternaJonal
ExploraJon
Group,
responsible
for
project
evaluaJon
outside
of
North
America,
including
precious
and
base
metals
projects
in
South
America,
East
Africa,
South
East
Asia,
Russia,
Mongolia,
Australia,
New
Zealand
and
Europe.

29. 29
FOCUSED & MOTIVATED
Mr.
Mitchell
Smith,
Corporate
Development
• Mr.
Smith
has
over
10
years
of
experience
in
senior
management
roles
encompassing
markeJng,
sales,
shareholder
relaJons,
corporate
communicaJons,
public
relaJons
and
business
development.
• Mr.
Smith
began
his
career
in
the
mining
sector
in
2007,
tenured
with
the
Petaquilla
Group
of
Companies
(Petaquilla
Minerals
TSX:PTQ
and
Petaquilla
Copper
(TSX:PTC))
(nowFirst
Quantum’s
Cobre
Panama
project)
where
he
worked
in
shareholders
relaJons
and
managed
communicaJons
between
the
Vancouver
and
Panama
headquarters.
• Mr.
Smith
is
responsible
for
developing,
implemenJng
and
execuJng
all
aspects
of
Global
Cobalt’s
corporate
development
acJviJes
in
its
transformaJon
from
Puget
Ventures
Inc.
• Mr.
Smith
sits
on
the
Editorial
Board
of
the
AssociaJon
of
Mineral
ExploraJon
BriJsh
Columbia
(AMEBC),
an
industry
advocate
organizaJon
for
successful
and
responsible
mineral
exploraJon
&
development
and
the
predominant
voice
of
mineral
exploraJon
and
development
in
BriJsh
Columbia.
Mr.
Graham
Abbo`,
Shareholder
Rela=ons
• Mr.
Abbou
has
12
years
of
corporate
experience
with
Telus,
with
involvement
in
business
sales,
operaJons
and
team
management
and
responsibility
for
mulJ-­‐million
dollar
transacJons.
• In-­‐depth
experience
with
long-­‐cycle
corporate
deal
development
and
complex
relaJonship
management.
• Involvement
with
several
public
companies
in
business
and
corporate
development
(both
strategic
and
financial),
operaJons
management
and
shareholders
relaJons
acJviJes.
• Key
member
of
team
responsible
for
consolidaJng
and
finalizing
the
Salares
Lithium
property
package
into
the
publicly
listed
company
that
became
Talison
Lithium.
Talison
Lithium
was
acquired
for
over
$750M
in
the
first
quarter
2013.
Mr.
Jaime
Stallwood,
Shareholder
Rela=ons
• 30
years
entrepreneurial
experience
managing
companies
from
early
stage
development
to
mulJ-­‐million
dollar
NASDAQ
listed
companies
on
both
the
operaJons
and
corporate
levels.
• Managed
a
naJonal
sales
force
in
excess
of
200
salespeople
for
a
naJonal
Telecom
Provider
while
at
the
same
Jme
implemenJng
naJonal
consumer
markeJng
and
iniJaJves.
• Key
involvement
with
LML
Payment
Systems
(a
NASDAQ
listed
company)
that
was
sold
for
$110M
in
first
quarter
of
2013.
• Has
parJcipated
in
numerous
M&A
transacJons
as
well
as
subsequent
integraJon,
uJlizaJon
and
markeJng
acJviJes.

30. 30
DEDICATED & EXPERIENCED
BOARD
OF
DIRECTORS:
Mr.
Gaston
Reymenants,
Director
Global
Cobalt
• DisJnguished
career
in
mining,
smelJng,
refining
and
metal
trading
spans
over
forty
years,
during
which,
he
was
also
responsible
for
the
financing
of
several
off-­‐take
projects
in
Australia,
China
and
the
Americas.
• Served
over
20
years
with
Falconbridge
InternaJonal
in
various
managerial
posiJons
and
was
part
of
the
joint
venture
with
Norilsk
Kombinat.
• Was
managing
director
of
Kola
InternaJonal
Murmansk,
and
held
director
and/or
senior
managerial
posiJons
with
several
companies
with
cobalt
assets
including
Baja
Mining,
Polymet
Mining
and
KCM.
• Mr.
Reymenants’s
wealth
of
knowledge
in
the
cobalt
and
industrial
metals
sectors
will
prove
an
excellent
resource
to
Global
Cobalt.
Mr.
Jean-­‐Pierre
Colin,
Director
Global
Cobalt
• Mr.
Colin
is
a
mining
execuJve
who
provides
corporate
strategy
consulJng
services
to
boards
and
shareholders
of
high
profile
internaJonal
mining
companies
and
was
was
an
investment
banker,
leading
corporate
finance
and
M&A
departments
of
several
securiJes
brokerage
houses
in
Canada.
• He
is
a
Director
of
Premier
Gold
Mines
(TSX:PG),
Director
of
Xmet
Inc.
(TSX.V:XME)
and
is
special
advisor
to
the
ExecuJve
Chairman
and
Board
of
BlackRock
Metals
Inc.
• He
is
the
former
Faculty
of
Arts
Co-­‐Chair
of
the
Waterloo
Advisory
Council,
founder
of
Caratax
Management
Ltd.,
a
manager
of
public
flow-­‐through
share
limited
partnerships,
and
a
former
director
of
Wolfden
Resources
Inc.,
Pelangio
Mines
Inc.,
Virginia
Gold
Mines
Inc.,
and
NIM
Management,
the
manager
of
over
$730
million
of
flow-­‐through
funds.
• Mr.
Colin
is
a
Member
of
the
Bar
of
the
Province
of
Quebec
and
holds
a
Master
of
Business
AdministraJon
from
the
University
of
Western
Ontario,
a
Civil
Law
Degree
from
the
University
of
Ouawa
and
a
CerJficate
in
ComparaJve
Law
from
the
University
of
Manitoba.
Mr.
Alexander
Ordanian,
Director
Global
Cobalt
• Mr.
Ordanian's
experience
in
the
mineral,
construcJon
development
and
investment
industry,
specializing
in
corporate
finance,
capital
markets
and
private
business,
spans
well
over
twenty
years.
• He
has
a
vast
experience
with
emerging
markets
parJcularly
in
the
Russian
FederaJon
and
CIS
countries
as
well
as
in
Central
and
Eastern
Europe.
• He
has
operated
and
been
associated
with
various
board
and
senior
management
teams,
and
successfully
managed
the
chief
execuJve
funcJon
for
a
holding
group
of
companies
with
mulJple
business
streams.
• During
his
highly
respected
career
he
worked
on
key
merger
and
acquisiJon
transacJons
with
a
number
of
major
internaJonal
companies
including
Mobil,
BriJsh
Petroleum
and
Shell.
• Currently,
Mr.
Ordanian
is
a
member
of
the
Board
of
Directors
of
Imperial
Mining
Holding
Limited
and
one
of
the
directors
of
a
North
American
merchant
services
company.

31. 31
DEDICATED & EXPERIENCED
BOARD
OF
DIRECTORS
CONTINUED:
Mr.
Peter
Reynolds,
Director
Global
Cobalt
• Mr.
Reynolds
is
engaged
by
EBRD
to
carry
out
reviews
of
EBRD's
investments
for
several
projects
in
Mongolia
and
Russia
and
was
previously
the
EBRD's
nominated
Director
on
the
Board
of
IMHL.
• Nearly
40
years
in
the
minerals
industry,
with
high-­‐level
experience
at
various
mines
including
being
former
Manager
of
OperaJons
Planning
&
Mine
Projects/Manager
Mine
Business
Improvement
at
Olympic
Dam
and
was
former
Managing
Director
Marlborough
Resources
as
well
as
Mining
Engineer
Normandy
Mining.
Mr.
Ray
Castelli,
Director
Global
Cobalt
• Mr.
Castelli
was
appointed
CEO
of
Weatherhaven,
one
of
the
world's
leading
manufacturers
of
redeploy
able
camps
and
shelter
systems,
in
January
2008.
• Weatherhaven
has
grown
to
become
a
key
supplier
to
the
Canadian,
US,
Australian
and
NATO
armed
forces,
numerous
resource
exploraJon
companies
as
well
as
the
United
NaJons
and
other
disaster
and
humanitarian
relief
agencies.
• Mr.
Castelli
was
co-­‐founder
and
Senior
Vice
President
of
Quadrem,
a
Dallas-­‐based
global
supply
chain
and
e-­‐procurement
company,
serving
19
of
the
world's
largest
natural
resource
companies,
including
Rio
Tinto,
BHP
Billiton,
Alcan
and
Inco.
His
role
was
to
build
the
global
organizaJon
and
product
set
for
this
e-­‐business
pioneer.
• Mr.
Castelli
joined
Alcan
in
1995
following
business
school
in
Europe.
He
was
promoted
to
Alcan's
Montreal
headquarters
in
1997
as
Director
of
Strategic
Planning.
Mr.
Kamen
Zahariev,
Director
Global
Cobalt
• Mr.
Zahariev
is
a
highly
respected
and
experienced
internaJonal
debt
and
equity
finance
and
investment
professional
with
parJcular
emphasis
on
Emerging
Markets
and
Central
and
Eastern
Europe.
• Currently,
Mr.
Zahariev
is
a
member
of
the
investment
commiuee
at
CEE
Special
SituaJon
Fund
and
is
a
Director
overseeing
the
team
responsible
for
European
Bank
for
ReconstrucJon
and
Development's
(the
EBRD)
significant
porvolio
of
restructuring
projects
throughout
Central
and
Eastern
Europe.
• He
has
extensive
experience
as
non-­‐execuJve
member
of
the
board
of
investee
companies
and
senior
advisor
of
investment
funds
in
the
region.
• In
the
last
15
years
Kamen
Zahariev
has
parJcipated
in
over
50
significant
transacJons
including
project
finance,
M&A,
private
equity
and
workouts.
• He
is
member
on
the
supervisory
board
at
Prista
Oil
B.V.
Group,
is
a
member
of
the
BriJsh
InsJtute
of
Directors
and
is
also
associated
with
several
business
organizaJons
with
interests
in
Eastern
Europe.
Mr.
Marc
Thomas,
Director
Global
Cobalt
• Mr.
Thomas,
P.Eng
is
an
EU
NaJonal
who
is
fluent
in
Russian
and
has
worked
and
traveled
extensively
throughout
Russia
&
the
former
CIS
countries
for
the
past
15
years.
• He
is
currently
the
General
Director
and
Partner
in
IST,
a
technology
company
represenJng
European
and
American
industrial
equipment
in
the
Russian
marketplace
and
serves
as
Director
at
Imperial
Mining
Holding
Limited.
• He
has
served
in
a
series
of
leadership
roles
of
increasing
responsibility
and
is
a
high
performing
leader,
with
strategic
and
commercial
acumen
obtained
from
start-­‐ups
and
business
development
in
blue
chip
and
fast
growth
Russian
companies.
• Mr.
Thomas
has
also
been
involved
with
three
corporate
re-­‐structurings
in
the
natural
resource
sector.
He
holds
an
MBA
from
INSEAD
(France)
and
a
BSc.,
Engineering
from
the
Colorado
School
of
Mines.

32. SUMMARY
VISION:
Achieve
growth
as
a
leading
strategic
metals
group
and
enhance
overall
value
for
shareholders
STRATEGY:
Balanced
and
flexible
combinaJon
of
enhancing
exisJng
assets,
organic
growth
and
strategic
acquisiJons
PARTNERSHIPS:
ConJnue
to
build
a
significant
enterprise
in
cooperaJon
with
influenJal
and
strong
partners
ASSETS:
Develop
exisJng
resources
and
expand
asset
porvolio
&
footprint
in
the
natural
resources
sector,
regionally
and
worldwide
LEADERSHIP:
Engaged
to
the
central
vision
of
advancing
the
porvolio
of
quality
assets
to
ensure
corporate
growth
&
valuaJon
32
EsJmated
values
given
43-­‐101
non-­‐compliant
C1+C2
Soviet
Resource
in
addiJon
to
historic
equivalent
of
10%
of
the
P1
Soviet
defined
resource.

33. 33
Global Cobalt Corporation
TSX.V:GCO
OTCBB:GLBCF
FRA: 3P0
Suite 1510-1050 West Pender Street
Vancouver, BC, V6E 3T4, Canada
T. (604) 688-4219
F. (604) 688-4215
info@globalcobaltcorp.com
www.GlobalCobaltCorp.com
Twitter @GlobalCobalt
“Powered
by
Cobalt”
33

34. EXPLORE
DEVELOP
ACQUIRE
LEAD
34