Mahmoud Abuelela, Stephan Olariu and Gongjun Yan, “Enhancing Automatic Incident Detection Techniques through Vehicle to Infrastructure Communication,” In Proceedings of the International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Beijing, China, October 2008, pp. 447–452.
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
Enhancing Automatic Incident Detection Techniques through Vehicle to Infrastructure Communication
1. Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Enhancing Automatic Incident Detection
Communica-
tion Techniques through Vehicle to Infrastructure
Communication
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
M. Abuelela , S. Olariu and Y. Gongjun
incident
detection
The 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Simulation
results
October 5, 2008
2. Outline
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to 1 Introduction
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
2 The proposed technique
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
3 Automatic incident detection
incident
detection
Simulation
results 4 Simulation results
3. Introduction
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Congested highways due to traffic incidents cost over
Introduction
75 billion a year in lost worker productivity, over 8.4
The proposed
technique billion gallons of fuel and an average of 119 persons
Automatic died each day in motor vehicle accidents
incident
detection
Simulation
results
4. Introduction
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Congested highways due to traffic incidents cost over
Introduction
75 billion a year in lost worker productivity, over 8.4
The proposed
technique billion gallons of fuel and an average of 119 persons
Automatic died each day in motor vehicle accidents
incident
detection Many incident detection algorithms exist from simple
Simulation
results
pattern recognition to AI techniques.
5. Introduction
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Congested highways due to traffic incidents cost over
Introduction
75 billion a year in lost worker productivity, over 8.4
The proposed
technique billion gallons of fuel and an average of 119 persons
Automatic died each day in motor vehicle accidents
incident
detection Many incident detection algorithms exist from simple
Simulation
results
pattern recognition to AI techniques.
The most widely-used devices are Inductive Loop
Detectors that measure traffic flow by registering a
signal each time a vehicle passes over them
6. Limitations of current techniques
Enhancing
Automatic All of the techniques, that use Inductive Loop Detectors
Incident
Detection or video detection cameras assign cars a passive role
Techniques
through in the detection process
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
7. Limitations of current techniques
Enhancing
Automatic All of the techniques, that use Inductive Loop Detectors
Incident
Detection or video detection cameras assign cars a passive role
Techniques
through in the detection process
Vehicle to
Infrastructure It is fundamentally difficult to detect non-blocking
Communica-
tion
accidents , as the deviation from normal traffic patterns
may be negligible.
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
8. Limitations of current techniques
Enhancing
Automatic All of the techniques, that use Inductive Loop Detectors
Incident
Detection or video detection cameras assign cars a passive role
Techniques
through in the detection process
Vehicle to
Infrastructure It is fundamentally difficult to detect non-blocking
Communica-
tion
accidents , as the deviation from normal traffic patterns
may be negligible.
Introduction Vision techniques fail under many situations like fog,
The proposed heavy rain and bright sun at which most accidents
technique
happen.
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
9. Limitations of current techniques
Enhancing
Automatic All of the techniques, that use Inductive Loop Detectors
Incident
Detection or video detection cameras assign cars a passive role
Techniques
through in the detection process
Vehicle to
Infrastructure It is fundamentally difficult to detect non-blocking
Communica-
tion
accidents , as the deviation from normal traffic patterns
may be negligible.
Introduction Vision techniques fail under many situations like fog,
The proposed heavy rain and bright sun at which most accidents
technique
happen.
Automatic
incident Moreover, installing cameras all over the highway is
detection
Simulation
very costly.
results
10. Limitations of current techniques
Enhancing
Automatic All of the techniques, that use Inductive Loop Detectors
Incident
Detection or video detection cameras assign cars a passive role
Techniques
through in the detection process
Vehicle to
Infrastructure It is fundamentally difficult to detect non-blocking
Communica-
tion
accidents , as the deviation from normal traffic patterns
may be negligible.
Introduction Vision techniques fail under many situations like fog,
The proposed heavy rain and bright sun at which most accidents
technique
happen.
Automatic
incident Moreover, installing cameras all over the highway is
detection
Simulation
very costly.
results Relying on cell phone calls still has some problems
because minor events (breakdowns which occur with
greater frequency and do not present a hazard to other
motorists or some obstacles that block only a single
lane) are often not reported by other motorists.
11. The proposed technique
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident Although VANETs started mainly for safety
Detection
Techniques applications, surprisingly a very few work have been
through
Vehicle to done in VANETs for Automatic Incident Detection while
Infrastructure
Communica-
most of the research went for developing routing
tion
protocols and privacy techniques.
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
12. The proposed technique
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident Although VANETs started mainly for safety
Detection
Techniques applications, surprisingly a very few work have been
through
Vehicle to done in VANETs for Automatic Incident Detection while
Infrastructure
Communica-
most of the research went for developing routing
tion
protocols and privacy techniques.
Introduction
the proposed technique is not a replacement for any of
The proposed
the current AID techniques
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
13. The proposed technique
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident Although VANETs started mainly for safety
Detection
Techniques applications, surprisingly a very few work have been
through
Vehicle to done in VANETs for Automatic Incident Detection while
Infrastructure
Communica-
most of the research went for developing routing
tion
protocols and privacy techniques.
Introduction
the proposed technique is not a replacement for any of
The proposed
the current AID techniques
technique
it can work beside any of them as a great enhancement
Automatic
incident to recover their limitations specially in sparse traffic.
detection
Simulation
results
14. The proposed technique
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident Although VANETs started mainly for safety
Detection
Techniques applications, surprisingly a very few work have been
through
Vehicle to done in VANETs for Automatic Incident Detection while
Infrastructure
Communica-
most of the research went for developing routing
tion
protocols and privacy techniques.
Introduction
the proposed technique is not a replacement for any of
The proposed
the current AID techniques
technique
it can work beside any of them as a great enhancement
Automatic
incident to recover their limitations specially in sparse traffic.
detection
Simulation
We assume that some form of infrastructures are
results
installed along the highway every mile or so.
15. The proposed technique
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident Although VANETs started mainly for safety
Detection
Techniques applications, surprisingly a very few work have been
through
Vehicle to done in VANETs for Automatic Incident Detection while
Infrastructure
Communica-
most of the research went for developing routing
tion
protocols and privacy techniques.
Introduction
the proposed technique is not a replacement for any of
The proposed
the current AID techniques
technique
it can work beside any of them as a great enhancement
Automatic
incident to recover their limitations specially in sparse traffic.
detection
Simulation
We assume that some form of infrastructures are
results
installed along the highway every mile or so.
This infrastructure may be in the form of roadside or in
the form of sensor belts embedded in the asphalt .
roadsides
16. Vehicle and roadside model
Enhancing
Automatic All vehicles are assumed to be GPS enabled.
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
17. Vehicle and roadside model
Enhancing
Automatic All vehicles are assumed to be GPS enabled.
Incident
Detection A vehicle can detect change lanes.
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
18. Vehicle and roadside model
Enhancing
Automatic All vehicles are assumed to be GPS enabled.
Incident
Detection A vehicle can detect change lanes.
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
A roadside is responsible for collecting and managing
Infrastructure
Communica-
Information about lane changes from passing vehicles
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
19. Vehicle and roadside model
Enhancing
Automatic All vehicles are assumed to be GPS enabled.
Incident
Detection A vehicle can detect change lanes.
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
A roadside is responsible for collecting and managing
Infrastructure
Communica-
Information about lane changes from passing vehicles
tion Each roadside has a table called RoadImage[m][n]
where m is equivalent to number of lanes and n is
Introduction
equivalent to the distance between two consecutive
The proposed
technique roadsides
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results
20. Vehicle and roadside model
Enhancing
Automatic All vehicles are assumed to be GPS enabled.
Incident
Detection A vehicle can detect change lanes.
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
A roadside is responsible for collecting and managing
Infrastructure
Communica-
Information about lane changes from passing vehicles
tion Each roadside has a table called RoadImage[m][n]
where m is equivalent to number of lanes and n is
Introduction
equivalent to the distance between two consecutive
The proposed
technique roadsides
Automatic The purpose of this table is to allow roadsides to have a
incident
detection virtual view about recent history of the road by
Simulation
results
recording how many cars have passed recently over
each position
21. Vehicle and roadside model
Enhancing
Automatic All vehicles are assumed to be GPS enabled.
Incident
Detection A vehicle can detect change lanes.
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
A roadside is responsible for collecting and managing
Infrastructure
Communica-
Information about lane changes from passing vehicles
tion Each roadside has a table called RoadImage[m][n]
where m is equivalent to number of lanes and n is
Introduction
equivalent to the distance between two consecutive
The proposed
technique roadsides
Automatic The purpose of this table is to allow roadsides to have a
incident
detection virtual view about recent history of the road by
Simulation
results
recording how many cars have passed recently over
each position
For example, when we say that RoadImage[i][j] = x, this
means that x cars have passed over the location (lane
= i; position = j) in the previous time interval
22. Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
if an incident occurred, we would expect to have a
The proposed
technique negative peak in the row corresponding to the lane
Automatic containing the incident while other lanes are still normal
incident
detection or have positive peaks especially for lanes adjacent to
Simulation the incidents lane
results
23. Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
if an incident occurred, we would expect to have a
The proposed
technique negative peak in the row corresponding to the lane
Automatic containing the incident while other lanes are still normal
incident
detection or have positive peaks especially for lanes adjacent to
Simulation the incidents lane
results
So, one may argue that detecting an incident is simply
to detect such a peak in the RoadImage table where
the minimum point, if large peak found, represents the
position of the incident.
24. Problems with the Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic Although this idea is simple and easy to implement, it has
Incident
Detection many shortcomings.
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure Consider this example where
Communica-
tion the shadowed area
represents car’s path that is
Introduction just received by a roadside.
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
In figure a, the middle position of lane 1 has a very low
Simulation
value, very few cars passed through these positions
results
recently
25. Problems with the Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic Although this idea is simple and easy to implement, it has
Incident
Detection many shortcomings.
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure Consider this example where
Communica-
tion the shadowed area
represents car’s path that is
Introduction just received by a roadside.
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
In figure a, the middle position of lane 1 has a very low
Simulation
value, very few cars passed through these positions
results
recently
If we applied the basic filling algorithm to the new
information, then we would have the table shown in
figure b.
26. Problems with the Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
The suspected positions still have very low values
Techniques
through
relative to corresponding positions in the other two
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
lanes that make it still be suspected.
Communica-
tion However, having a car recently passed over these
positions should override previous history for them and
Introduction remove any suspicion accumulated over time about
The proposed
technique
them !!
Automatic Example on the above situation is when we have a slow
incident
detection car or temporary broken car, then a history might be
Simulation built against some positions
results
The problem is that it would take very long time until the
table be balanced again even if one car was enough to
remove any suspicion about these positions.
27. Problems with the Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
The suspected positions still have very low values
Techniques
through
relative to corresponding positions in the other two
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
lanes that make it still be suspected.
Communica-
tion However, having a car recently passed over these
positions should override previous history for them and
Introduction remove any suspicion accumulated over time about
The proposed
technique
them !!
Automatic Example on the above situation is when we have a slow
incident
detection car or temporary broken car, then a history might be
Simulation built against some positions
results
The problem is that it would take very long time until the
table be balanced again even if one car was enough to
remove any suspicion about these positions.
28. Problems with the Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
The suspected positions still have very low values
Techniques
through
relative to corresponding positions in the other two
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
lanes that make it still be suspected.
Communica-
tion However, having a car recently passed over these
positions should override previous history for them and
Introduction remove any suspicion accumulated over time about
The proposed
technique
them !!
Automatic Example on the above situation is when we have a slow
incident
detection car or temporary broken car, then a history might be
Simulation built against some positions
results
The problem is that it would take very long time until the
table be balanced again even if one car was enough to
remove any suspicion about these positions.
29. Problems with the Basic idea
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
The suspected positions still have very low values
Techniques
through
relative to corresponding positions in the other two
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
lanes that make it still be suspected.
Communica-
tion However, having a car recently passed over these
positions should override previous history for them and
Introduction remove any suspicion accumulated over time about
The proposed
technique
them !!
Automatic Example on the above situation is when we have a slow
incident
detection car or temporary broken car, then a history might be
Simulation built against some positions
results
The problem is that it would take very long time until the
table be balanced again even if one car was enough to
remove any suspicion about these positions.
30. Modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident The following rule is used to fill the RoadImage table
Detection
Techniques after receiving a new information from a car
through
Vehicle to If a car passed over a certain position, this position is
Infrastructure
Communica- clear and must have value larger than corresponding
tion
positions in other lanes
Introduction The main advantage of the modified approach is that it
The proposed has a rapid convergence, Once a position is cleared,
technique
the table will show that immediately.
Automatic
incident
detection
Also, after clearing an incident, once a car passed over
Simulation
the incident position, the table will show an
results
incident-free status.
Values in the table now does not reflect number of cars
passed though every position as before. They just
reflect status of the road.
31. Modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident The following rule is used to fill the RoadImage table
Detection
Techniques after receiving a new information from a car
through
Vehicle to If a car passed over a certain position, this position is
Infrastructure
Communica- clear and must have value larger than corresponding
tion
positions in other lanes
Introduction The main advantage of the modified approach is that it
The proposed has a rapid convergence, Once a position is cleared,
technique
the table will show that immediately.
Automatic
incident
detection
Also, after clearing an incident, once a car passed over
Simulation
the incident position, the table will show an
results
incident-free status.
Values in the table now does not reflect number of cars
passed though every position as before. They just
reflect status of the road.
32. Modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident The following rule is used to fill the RoadImage table
Detection
Techniques after receiving a new information from a car
through
Vehicle to If a car passed over a certain position, this position is
Infrastructure
Communica- clear and must have value larger than corresponding
tion
positions in other lanes
Introduction The main advantage of the modified approach is that it
The proposed has a rapid convergence, Once a position is cleared,
technique
the table will show that immediately.
Automatic
incident
detection
Also, after clearing an incident, once a car passed over
Simulation
the incident position, the table will show an
results
incident-free status.
Values in the table now does not reflect number of cars
passed though every position as before. They just
reflect status of the road.
33. Modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident The following rule is used to fill the RoadImage table
Detection
Techniques after receiving a new information from a car
through
Vehicle to If a car passed over a certain position, this position is
Infrastructure
Communica- clear and must have value larger than corresponding
tion
positions in other lanes
Introduction The main advantage of the modified approach is that it
The proposed has a rapid convergence, Once a position is cleared,
technique
the table will show that immediately.
Automatic
incident
detection
Also, after clearing an incident, once a car passed over
Simulation
the incident position, the table will show an
results
incident-free status.
Values in the table now does not reflect number of cars
passed though every position as before. They just
reflect status of the road.
34. Modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident The following rule is used to fill the RoadImage table
Detection
Techniques after receiving a new information from a car
through
Vehicle to If a car passed over a certain position, this position is
Infrastructure
Communica- clear and must have value larger than corresponding
tion
positions in other lanes
Introduction The main advantage of the modified approach is that it
The proposed has a rapid convergence, Once a position is cleared,
technique
the table will show that immediately.
Automatic
incident
detection
Also, after clearing an incident, once a car passed over
Simulation
the incident position, the table will show an
results
incident-free status.
Values in the table now does not reflect number of cars
passed though every position as before. They just
reflect status of the road.
35. Problems with the modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic If a roadside received information1 from car x at time t1
Incident
Detection and received information2 from car y at time t2 where
Techniques
through t1 < t2, we assumed implicitly that x was always ahead
Vehicle to
Infrastructure of y since the last roadside
Communica-
tion
That is not true as a general case as cars may
accelerate and pass each other.
Introduction The simplest example for this situation is when a slow
The proposed car passes over a certain position then an accident
technique
occurs at that location.
Automatic
incident Fast cars may arrive first to next roadside and provide
detection
Simulation
some information about the incident
results However, according to the modified algorithm, when the
slow car arrives at the roadside, that roadside may,
wrongly, clear that position and gives it high value
which is not true
36. Problems with the modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic If a roadside received information1 from car x at time t1
Incident
Detection and received information2 from car y at time t2 where
Techniques
through t1 < t2, we assumed implicitly that x was always ahead
Vehicle to
Infrastructure of y since the last roadside
Communica-
tion
That is not true as a general case as cars may
accelerate and pass each other.
Introduction The simplest example for this situation is when a slow
The proposed car passes over a certain position then an accident
technique
occurs at that location.
Automatic
incident Fast cars may arrive first to next roadside and provide
detection
Simulation
some information about the incident
results However, according to the modified algorithm, when the
slow car arrives at the roadside, that roadside may,
wrongly, clear that position and gives it high value
which is not true
37. Problems with the modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic If a roadside received information1 from car x at time t1
Incident
Detection and received information2 from car y at time t2 where
Techniques
through t1 < t2, we assumed implicitly that x was always ahead
Vehicle to
Infrastructure of y since the last roadside
Communica-
tion
That is not true as a general case as cars may
accelerate and pass each other.
Introduction The simplest example for this situation is when a slow
The proposed car passes over a certain position then an accident
technique
occurs at that location.
Automatic
incident Fast cars may arrive first to next roadside and provide
detection
Simulation
some information about the incident
results However, according to the modified algorithm, when the
slow car arrives at the roadside, that roadside may,
wrongly, clear that position and gives it high value
which is not true
38. Problems with the modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic If a roadside received information1 from car x at time t1
Incident
Detection and received information2 from car y at time t2 where
Techniques
through t1 < t2, we assumed implicitly that x was always ahead
Vehicle to
Infrastructure of y since the last roadside
Communica-
tion
That is not true as a general case as cars may
accelerate and pass each other.
Introduction The simplest example for this situation is when a slow
The proposed car passes over a certain position then an accident
technique
occurs at that location.
Automatic
incident Fast cars may arrive first to next roadside and provide
detection
Simulation
some information about the incident
results However, according to the modified algorithm, when the
slow car arrives at the roadside, that roadside may,
wrongly, clear that position and gives it high value
which is not true
39. Problems with the modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic If a roadside received information1 from car x at time t1
Incident
Detection and received information2 from car y at time t2 where
Techniques
through t1 < t2, we assumed implicitly that x was always ahead
Vehicle to
Infrastructure of y since the last roadside
Communica-
tion
That is not true as a general case as cars may
accelerate and pass each other.
Introduction The simplest example for this situation is when a slow
The proposed car passes over a certain position then an accident
technique
occurs at that location.
Automatic
incident Fast cars may arrive first to next roadside and provide
detection
Simulation
some information about the incident
results However, according to the modified algorithm, when the
slow car arrives at the roadside, that roadside may,
wrongly, clear that position and gives it high value
which is not true
40. Problems with the modified table filling
Enhancing
Automatic If a roadside received information1 from car x at time t1
Incident
Detection and received information2 from car y at time t2 where
Techniques
through t1 < t2, we assumed implicitly that x was always ahead
Vehicle to
Infrastructure of y since the last roadside
Communica-
tion
That is not true as a general case as cars may
accelerate and pass each other.
Introduction The simplest example for this situation is when a slow
The proposed car passes over a certain position then an accident
technique
occurs at that location.
Automatic
incident Fast cars may arrive first to next roadside and provide
detection
Simulation
some information about the incident
results However, according to the modified algorithm, when the
slow car arrives at the roadside, that roadside may,
wrongly, clear that position and gives it high value
which is not true
41. Time dependent modified filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
we modify the RoadImage table to contain not only the
Techniques
through
counter for each cell but also the last time when that
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
counter was changed. Thus, each cell in the table will
Communica-
tion
be on the form < Count; LTime >
Whenever an information reports that its car passed
Introduction over any position, we check the reported time with the
The proposed
technique
last time stored in the table for that position
Automatic If the current reported time is larger than the last time
incident
detection stored in the cell or the reported time is smaller than
Simulation the last time by certain threshold, then we change it as
results
before.
Otherwise, we simply ignore that result because it is
outdated and should not override newer reports
42. Time dependent modified filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
we modify the RoadImage table to contain not only the
Techniques
through
counter for each cell but also the last time when that
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
counter was changed. Thus, each cell in the table will
Communica-
tion
be on the form < Count; LTime >
Whenever an information reports that its car passed
Introduction over any position, we check the reported time with the
The proposed
technique
last time stored in the table for that position
Automatic If the current reported time is larger than the last time
incident
detection stored in the cell or the reported time is smaller than
Simulation the last time by certain threshold, then we change it as
results
before.
Otherwise, we simply ignore that result because it is
outdated and should not override newer reports
43. Time dependent modified filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
we modify the RoadImage table to contain not only the
Techniques
through
counter for each cell but also the last time when that
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
counter was changed. Thus, each cell in the table will
Communica-
tion
be on the form < Count; LTime >
Whenever an information reports that its car passed
Introduction over any position, we check the reported time with the
The proposed
technique
last time stored in the table for that position
Automatic If the current reported time is larger than the last time
incident
detection stored in the cell or the reported time is smaller than
Simulation the last time by certain threshold, then we change it as
results
before.
Otherwise, we simply ignore that result because it is
outdated and should not override newer reports
44. Time dependent modified filling
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
we modify the RoadImage table to contain not only the
Techniques
through
counter for each cell but also the last time when that
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
counter was changed. Thus, each cell in the table will
Communica-
tion
be on the form < Count; LTime >
Whenever an information reports that its car passed
Introduction over any position, we check the reported time with the
The proposed
technique
last time stored in the table for that position
Automatic If the current reported time is larger than the last time
incident
detection stored in the cell or the reported time is smaller than
Simulation the last time by certain threshold, then we change it as
results
before.
Otherwise, we simply ignore that result because it is
outdated and should not override newer reports
45. Incident detection
Enhancing
Automatic the detection process may be summarized as follow
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Compute the average (µ) and
Communica- slandered deviation (σ)for
tion
Count values for each row in
Introduction
the table. i.e. for each lane.
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident Find the minimum Count, Countmin
detection
Simulation
Use the idea of bandpass filter to take away regular
results oscillation and fluctuation from the values.
If µ − σ − LCountmin > K then raise an alarm for an
incident, where K is a conservatively factor that
determines how conservative should the detection be.
46. Incident detection
Enhancing
Automatic the detection process may be summarized as follow
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Compute the average (µ) and
Communica- slandered deviation (σ)for
tion
Count values for each row in
Introduction
the table. i.e. for each lane.
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident Find the minimum Count, Countmin
detection
Simulation
Use the idea of bandpass filter to take away regular
results oscillation and fluctuation from the values.
If µ − σ − LCountmin > K then raise an alarm for an
incident, where K is a conservatively factor that
determines how conservative should the detection be.
47. Incident detection
Enhancing
Automatic the detection process may be summarized as follow
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Compute the average (µ) and
Communica- slandered deviation (σ)for
tion
Count values for each row in
Introduction
the table. i.e. for each lane.
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident Find the minimum Count, Countmin
detection
Simulation
Use the idea of bandpass filter to take away regular
results oscillation and fluctuation from the values.
If µ − σ − LCountmin > K then raise an alarm for an
incident, where K is a conservatively factor that
determines how conservative should the detection be.
48. Effect conservatively factor
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
For small conservatively factor, more false alarms are
Automatic generated.
incident
detection
Small conservatively factor means perfect detection
Simulation rate as the roadside can simply deduce the incident
results
during its occurrence time.
As the roadside becomes more conservative, longer
time will be needed to have large difference between
values in the RoadImage table and in turn to detect the
accident
49. Effect conservatively factor
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
For small conservatively factor, more false alarms are
Automatic generated.
incident
detection
Small conservatively factor means perfect detection
Simulation rate as the roadside can simply deduce the incident
results
during its occurrence time.
As the roadside becomes more conservative, longer
time will be needed to have large difference between
values in the RoadImage table and in turn to detect the
accident
50. Effect conservatively factor
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
For small conservatively factor, more false alarms are
Automatic generated.
incident
detection
Small conservatively factor means perfect detection
Simulation rate as the roadside can simply deduce the incident
results
during its occurrence time.
As the roadside becomes more conservative, longer
time will be needed to have large difference between
values in the RoadImage table and in turn to detect the
accident
51. Impact of traffic flow
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic The larger the traffic flow, the more reports that will be
incident
detection collected by the roadside and hence the larger the
Simulation possibility of wrong detection.
results
As the traffic flow increases, more cars and drivers will
be available to report about the incident and hence less
detection time is required.
52. Impact of traffic flow
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic The larger the traffic flow, the more reports that will be
incident
detection collected by the roadside and hence the larger the
Simulation possibility of wrong detection.
results
As the traffic flow increases, more cars and drivers will
be available to report about the incident and hence less
detection time is required.
53. Impact of the distance between roadsides
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
We could get 100% detection rate for roadside intervals
The proposed
technique less than 4500 meters for both sparse and moderate
Automatic traffic flow. However, after 4500 meters, time needed to
incident
detection detection the incident is longer than the incident
Simulation duration and thus, the roadside can not detect it
results
The larger the distance between roadsides, the longer
the time needed to detect an incident. This is because,
cars will need to travel longer in order to provide their
reports to next roadside
54. Impact of the distance between roadsides
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
We could get 100% detection rate for roadside intervals
The proposed
technique less than 4500 meters for both sparse and moderate
Automatic traffic flow. However, after 4500 meters, time needed to
incident
detection detection the incident is longer than the incident
Simulation duration and thus, the roadside can not detect it
results
The larger the distance between roadsides, the longer
the time needed to detect an incident. This is because,
cars will need to travel longer in order to provide their
reports to next roadside
55. Impact of the probability of successful
communication
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic Cars may not have enough time to setup a
incident
detection communication with the roadside.
Simulation
results
The detection time at success probability of 0.8 is only
10 % more than the detection time at a perfect situation
Even if not all cars have succeeded in communicating
with the roadside , the mean detection time may be still
acceptable
56. Impact of the probability of successful
communication
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic Cars may not have enough time to setup a
incident
detection communication with the roadside.
Simulation
results
The detection time at success probability of 0.8 is only
10 % more than the detection time at a perfect situation
Even if not all cars have succeeded in communicating
with the roadside , the mean detection time may be still
acceptable
57. Impact of the probability of successful
communication
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic Cars may not have enough time to setup a
incident
detection communication with the roadside.
Simulation
results
The detection time at success probability of 0.8 is only
10 % more than the detection time at a perfect situation
Even if not all cars have succeeded in communicating
with the roadside , the mean detection time may be still
acceptable
58. Conclusion and future work
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
Traditional AID techniques that rely on ILDs or video
through camera detection have many shortcomings
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
We introduced a novel approach to detect non sever
tion
incident under non dense traffic through vehicles to
infrastructure communication
Introduction
The proposed
Future work includes developing a comprehensive
technique technique to detect incidents under any traffic condition.
Automatic
incident More data mining and intelligent techniques may be
detection
used to enhance the performance of the proposed
Simulation
results technique
Also, other traffic parameters and drivers input may be
taken into consideration
59. Conclusion and future work
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
Traditional AID techniques that rely on ILDs or video
through camera detection have many shortcomings
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
We introduced a novel approach to detect non sever
tion
incident under non dense traffic through vehicles to
infrastructure communication
Introduction
The proposed
Future work includes developing a comprehensive
technique technique to detect incidents under any traffic condition.
Automatic
incident More data mining and intelligent techniques may be
detection
used to enhance the performance of the proposed
Simulation
results technique
Also, other traffic parameters and drivers input may be
taken into consideration
60. Conclusion and future work
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
Traditional AID techniques that rely on ILDs or video
through camera detection have many shortcomings
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
We introduced a novel approach to detect non sever
tion
incident under non dense traffic through vehicles to
infrastructure communication
Introduction
The proposed
Future work includes developing a comprehensive
technique technique to detect incidents under any traffic condition.
Automatic
incident More data mining and intelligent techniques may be
detection
used to enhance the performance of the proposed
Simulation
results technique
Also, other traffic parameters and drivers input may be
taken into consideration
61. Conclusion and future work
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
Traditional AID techniques that rely on ILDs or video
through camera detection have many shortcomings
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
We introduced a novel approach to detect non sever
tion
incident under non dense traffic through vehicles to
infrastructure communication
Introduction
The proposed
Future work includes developing a comprehensive
technique technique to detect incidents under any traffic condition.
Automatic
incident More data mining and intelligent techniques may be
detection
used to enhance the performance of the proposed
Simulation
results technique
Also, other traffic parameters and drivers input may be
taken into consideration
62. Conclusion and future work
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
Traditional AID techniques that rely on ILDs or video
through camera detection have many shortcomings
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
We introduced a novel approach to detect non sever
tion
incident under non dense traffic through vehicles to
infrastructure communication
Introduction
The proposed
Future work includes developing a comprehensive
technique technique to detect incidents under any traffic condition.
Automatic
incident More data mining and intelligent techniques may be
detection
used to enhance the performance of the proposed
Simulation
results technique
Also, other traffic parameters and drivers input may be
taken into consideration
63. Thank You !
Enhancing
Automatic
Incident
Detection
Techniques
through
Vehicle to
Infrastructure
Communica-
tion
Introduction
The proposed
technique
Automatic
incident
detection
Simulation
results