SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 21
Descargar para leer sin conexión
`
1
Definition: Propositional Logic
A proposition is a collection of declarative statements that has either a truth value
"true” or a truth value "false". A propositional consists of propositional variables
and connectives. We denote the propositional variables by capital letters (A, B, C
etc). The connectives connect the propositional variables.
Some examples of Propositions are given below:
• "Man is Mortal", it returns truth value“TRUE” as T.
• "12 + 9 = 3 − 2", it returns truth
value “FALSE” as F.
The following is not a Proposition
• "A is less than 2". It is because unless we give a specific value of A, we
cannot say whether the statement is true orfalse.
Connectives
In propositional logic generally we use five connectives which are OR (), AND
(), Negation/ NOT (¬), Conditional or Implication / if-then (→), Bi conditional or
If and only if ().
Negation (¬) − The negation of a proposition A (written as ¬A) is false when A is true and is true when A
is false.
The truth table is as follows –
A ¬A
True False
False True
AND (  ) − The AND operation of two propositions A and B (written as A  B) is
true if both the propositional variable A and B is true.
`
2
The truth table is as follows −
A B A  B
True True False
True False False
False True False
False False True
OR ()− The OR operation of two propositions A and B (written as A  B) is true
if at least any of the propositional variable A or B is true.
The truth table is as follows −
A B A  B
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F
Implication / if-then (→) − An implication A→B is False if A is true and B is false. The rest
cases are true.
`
3
The truth table is as follows −
A B A → B
True True True
True False False
False True True
False False True
If and only if ()− A B is bi-conditional logical connective which is true when
p and q are both false or both are true.
The truth table is as follows −
A B A  B
True True True
True False False
False True False
False False True
Well Formed Formulas (WFFs)
The well formed formulas (WFFs) or statement formulas or logic formulas are defined
recursively (or inductively) as below.
1. Propositional variables p,q,r,… and propositional constants F,T are well formed
formulas. They are known as primitive WFFs.
`
4
2. If P and Q are WFFs then P,Q,P Q,P  Q,P → Q and P  Q are also WFFs.
3. All WFFs are obtained by the above procedures applied a finite number of times.
For example, the following are WFFs
p, p  q, p → q, p (q → r) (p  q)→ r, (p → q)→(q → p)
Note: In order to avoid excessive use of parenthesis, we adopt an order of precedence for
logical Operators.
, , , → and 
Tautologies
A Tautology is a formula which is always true for every value of its propositional variables.
Example − Prove [(A → B)  A] → B is a tautology
The truth table is as follows −
A B A → B (A → B)  A [(A → B)  A] → B
True True True True True
True False False False True
False True True False True
False False True False True
As we can see every value of [(A → B)  A] → B is “True”, it is a tautology.
Contradictions
A Contradiction is a formula which is always false for every value of its propositional
variables.
Example − Prove (A VB)  [(¬A)  (¬B)] is a contradiction
The truth table is as follows −
`
5
A B A 
B
¬A ¬B (¬A) 
(¬B)
(A V B)  [(¬A) 
(¬B)]
True True True False False False False
True False True False True False False
False True True True False False False
False False False True True True False
As we can see every value of (A  B)  [(¬A)  (¬B)] is “False”, it is a
Contradiction.
Contingency
A Contingency is a formula which has both some true and some false values for
every value of its propositional variables.
Example − Prove (A  B)  (¬A) a contingency
The truth table is as follows −
A B A  B ¬A (A  B)  (¬A)
True True True False False
True False True False False
False True True True True
False False False True False
As we can see every value of (A  B)  (¬A) has both “True” and “False”, it
is a contingency.
Propositional Equivalences
`
6
Two statements X and Y are logically equivalent if any of the following two conditions −
• The truth tables of each statement have the same truth values.
• The bi-conditional statement X Y is a tautology.
Example−Prove¬(A  B)and[(¬A)  (¬B)]are
equivalent Testing by 1st method (Matching truth
table)
A B A 
B
¬ (A  B) ¬A ¬B [(¬A)  (¬B)]
True True True False False False False
True False True False False True False
False True True False True False False
False False False True True True True
Here, we can see the truth values of ¬ (A  B) and [(¬A)  (¬B)] are same, hence
the statements are equivalent.
Testing by 2nd method (Bi-conditionality)
A B ¬ (A 
B)
[(¬A) 
(¬B)]
[¬ (A  B)]  [(¬A) 
(¬B)]
True True False False True
True False False False True
False True False False True
False False True True True
As [¬ (A  B)]  [(¬A)  (¬B)] is a tautology, the statements are equivalent.
`
8
Laws of Propositional Logic:
S.No Name of Laws Primal Form Dual Form
1 Idempotent Law p  p  p p  p  p
2 Identity Law p  F  p p  T  p
3 Dominant Law p  T  T p  F  F
4 Complement Law p  p  T p  p  F
5 Commutative Law p  q  q  p p  q  q  p
6 Associative Law p  (q  r) (p  q) r p (q  r) (p  q) r
7 Distributive Law p(qr) (p  q)(p  r) p(q  r) (p q)(p r)
8 Absorption Law p  (p  q) p p (p  q) p
9 De Morgan’s Law (p  q) p q (p  q) p  q
10 Double Negation Law (p)  p -
Logical Equivalences involving Conditional Statements
Logical Equivalences involving Biconditional Statements
Inverse, Converse, and Contra-positive
A conditional statement has two parts − Hypothesis and Conclusion.
Example of Conditional Statement − “If you do your homework, you will not
be punished.” Here, "you do your homework" is the hypothesis and "you will
`
9
not be punished" is the conclusion.
Inverse –An inverse of the conditional statement is the negation of both the
hypothesis and the conclusion. If the statement is “If p, then q”, the inverse will
be “If not p, then not q”. The inverse of “If you do your homework, you will not
be punished” is “If you do not do your homework, you will be punished.”
Converse−The converse of the conditional statement is computed by interchanging the
hypothesis and the conclusion. If the statement is “If p, then q”, the inverse will be “If q,
Then p”. The converse of "If you do your homework, you will not be punished" is "If you
will not be punished, you do not do your homework”.
Contra-positive –The contra-positive of the conditional is computed by
interchanging the hypothesis and the conclusion of the inverse statement. If the
statement is “If p, then q”, the inverse will be “If not q, then not p”. The Contra-
positive of "If you do your homework, you will not be punished” is "If you will
be punished, you do your home work”.
Duality Principle
Duality principle set states that for any true statement, the dual statement
obtained by interchanging unions into intersections (and vice versa) and
interchanging Universal set into Null set (and vice versa) is also true. If dual of
any statement is the statement itself, it is said self-dual statement.
`
10
Examples
`
11
Elementary Product: A product of the variables and their negations in a
formula is called an elementary product. If p and q are any two atomic
variables, then p, p  q, q  p, p  q are some examples of
elementary products.
Elementary Sum: A sum of the variables and their negations in a formula is
called an elementary sum. If P and Q are any two atomic variables, then
p, p  q, q  p, p  q are some examples of elementary sums.
Normal Forms: We can convert any proposition in two normal forms −
1. Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) 2.Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF)
Conjunctive Normal Form
A compound statement is in conjunctive normal form if it is obtained by
operating AND among variables (negation of variables included) connected
with ORs.
Examples: 1. (p  q) (q  r)
2. (p  q  r) (s  r)
Disjunctive Normal Form
A compound statement is in disjunctive normal form if it is obtained by
operating OR among variables (negation of variables included) connected with
ANDs.
Example: (p  q) (p  q) (p  q  r)
Functionally Complete set
A set of logical operators is called functionally complete if every compound
proposition is logically equivalent to a compound proposition involving only
this set of logical operators. ,,  form a functionally complete set of
operators.
Minterms: For two variables p and q there are 4 possible formulas which
consist of conjunctions of p,q or it’s negation given by
p  q, p  q, p  q, p  q
`
12
Maxterms: For two variables p and q there are 4 possible formulas which
consist of disjunctions of p,q or its negation given by
p  q, p  q, p  q, p  q
Principal Disjunctive Normal Form: For a given formula an equivalent
formula consisting of disjunctions of minterms only is known as principal
disjunctive normal form (PDNF).
Principal Conjunctive Normal Form: For a given formula an equivalent
formula consisting of conjunctions of maxterms only is known as principal
conjunctive normal form (PCNF).
Problems:
`
13
`
14
Rule of inference to build arguments:
RuleP: A premise may be introduced at point in the derivation
Rule T: A formula S may be introduced in a derivation if S is a tautologically
implied by any one or more of the preceeding formulas in the derivation.
Rule CP: If we can derive S from R and a set of premises, then we can derive
R →S from the set of premises alone. Rule CP is also called deduction theoem.
`
15
Examples:
`
16
`
17
Quantifiers:
The variable of predicates is quantified by quantifiers. There are two types of quantifier in
Predicate logic − Universal Quantifier and Existential Quantifier.
Universal Quantifier:
Universal quantifier states that the statements within its scope are true for every
value of the specific variable. It is denoted by the symbol ∀.
∀x P(x) is read as for every value of x, P(x) is true.
Example: "Man is mortal" can be transformed into the propositional form ∀x
P(x) where P(x) is the predicate which denotes x is mortal and the universe of
discourse is all men.
Existential Quantifier:
Existential quantifier states that the statements within its scope are true for some
values of the specific variable. It is denoted by the symbol ∃.∃x P(x) is read as
for some values of x, P(x) is true.
`
18
Example: "Some people are dishonest" can be transformed into the
propositional form ∃x P(x) where P(x) is the predicate which denotes x is
dishonest and the universe of discourse is some people.
Nested Quantifiers:
If we use a quantifier that appears within the scope of another quantifier, it is
called nested quantifier.
`
19
Symbolize the following statements:
(a)All men are mortal
(b)All the world loves alover
(c) X is the father of
mother of Y (d)No cats
has atail
(e) Some people who trust others are rewarded
Solution:
`
20
`
21
1

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Translating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional LogicTranslating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional Logic
Janet Stemwedel
 
Discrete Mathematics Lecture
Discrete Mathematics LectureDiscrete Mathematics Lecture
Discrete Mathematics Lecture
Genie Rose Santos
 
Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)
Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)
Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)
kevinwu1994
 
Lecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inference
Lecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inferenceLecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inference
Lecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inference
asimnawaz54
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

CMSC 56 | Lecture 1: Propositional Logic
CMSC 56 | Lecture 1: Propositional LogicCMSC 56 | Lecture 1: Propositional Logic
CMSC 56 | Lecture 1: Propositional Logic
 
Method of direct proof
Method of direct proofMethod of direct proof
Method of direct proof
 
Logic (slides)
Logic (slides)Logic (slides)
Logic (slides)
 
Propositional Logic (Descreate Mathematics)
Propositional Logic (Descreate Mathematics)Propositional Logic (Descreate Mathematics)
Propositional Logic (Descreate Mathematics)
 
Discrete mathematics [LOGICAL CONNECTIVES]
Discrete mathematics [LOGICAL CONNECTIVES]Discrete mathematics [LOGICAL CONNECTIVES]
Discrete mathematics [LOGICAL CONNECTIVES]
 
Translating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional LogicTranslating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional Logic
 
Discrete Mathematics Lecture
Discrete Mathematics LectureDiscrete Mathematics Lecture
Discrete Mathematics Lecture
 
Proposition (Logic)
Proposition (Logic)Proposition (Logic)
Proposition (Logic)
 
Logical equivalence, laws of logic
Logical equivalence, laws of logicLogical equivalence, laws of logic
Logical equivalence, laws of logic
 
Fundamentals of logic 1
Fundamentals of logic   1Fundamentals of logic   1
Fundamentals of logic 1
 
Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)
Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)
Mcs lecture19.methods ofproof(1)
 
Proofs by contraposition
Proofs by contrapositionProofs by contraposition
Proofs by contraposition
 
Truth table
Truth tableTruth table
Truth table
 
Chapter 6 Balagurusamy Programming ANSI in c
Chapter 6  Balagurusamy Programming ANSI  in cChapter 6  Balagurusamy Programming ANSI  in c
Chapter 6 Balagurusamy Programming ANSI in c
 
Lecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inference
Lecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inferenceLecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inference
Lecture 2 predicates quantifiers and rules of inference
 
C2.0 propositional logic
C2.0 propositional logicC2.0 propositional logic
C2.0 propositional logic
 
Numerical Integration
Numerical IntegrationNumerical Integration
Numerical Integration
 
Maths P.P.T. Connectives
Maths P.P.T. ConnectivesMaths P.P.T. Connectives
Maths P.P.T. Connectives
 
Discrete Math Lecture 03: Methods of Proof
Discrete Math Lecture 03: Methods of ProofDiscrete Math Lecture 03: Methods of Proof
Discrete Math Lecture 03: Methods of Proof
 
Unit 1 introduction to proofs
Unit 1  introduction to proofsUnit 1  introduction to proofs
Unit 1 introduction to proofs
 

Similar a Proposition Logic in Discrete Structure

20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
ssuser92109d
 
Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1
Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1
Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1
taimoor iftikhar
 
Mathmatical reasoning
Mathmatical reasoningMathmatical reasoning
Mathmatical reasoning
indu psthakur
 
Discrete structures & optimization unit 1
Discrete structures & optimization unit 1Discrete structures & optimization unit 1
Discrete structures & optimization unit 1
SURBHI SAROHA
 
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2
David Wood
 
logicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdf
logicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdflogicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdf
logicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdf
PradeeshSAI
 

Similar a Proposition Logic in Discrete Structure (20)

UGC NET Computer Science & Application book.pdf [Sample]
UGC NET Computer Science & Application book.pdf  [Sample]UGC NET Computer Science & Application book.pdf  [Sample]
UGC NET Computer Science & Application book.pdf [Sample]
 
20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
 
Logic in Computer Science Unit 2 (1).pptx
Logic in Computer Science Unit 2 (1).pptxLogic in Computer Science Unit 2 (1).pptx
Logic in Computer Science Unit 2 (1).pptx
 
DM(1).pptx
DM(1).pptxDM(1).pptx
DM(1).pptx
 
Tablas de Verdad
Tablas de VerdadTablas de Verdad
Tablas de Verdad
 
Logic
LogicLogic
Logic
 
Chapter1p1
Chapter1p1Chapter1p1
Chapter1p1
 
Basic Connectives and Truth Tables.ppt
Basic Connectives and Truth Tables.pptBasic Connectives and Truth Tables.ppt
Basic Connectives and Truth Tables.ppt
 
12_Truth_Tables.pptx
12_Truth_Tables.pptx12_Truth_Tables.pptx
12_Truth_Tables.pptx
 
Chapter 01 - p1.pdf
Chapter 01 - p1.pdfChapter 01 - p1.pdf
Chapter 01 - p1.pdf
 
Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1
Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1
Disrete mathematics and_its application_by_rosen _7th edition_lecture_1
 
Mathmatical reasoning
Mathmatical reasoningMathmatical reasoning
Mathmatical reasoning
 
Drinkfromme.pptx
Drinkfromme.pptxDrinkfromme.pptx
Drinkfromme.pptx
 
Computer Organization and Assembly Language
Computer Organization and Assembly LanguageComputer Organization and Assembly Language
Computer Organization and Assembly Language
 
Discrete structures & optimization unit 1
Discrete structures & optimization unit 1Discrete structures & optimization unit 1
Discrete structures & optimization unit 1
 
3 computing truth tables
3   computing truth tables3   computing truth tables
3 computing truth tables
 
Chapter1p1.pdf
Chapter1p1.pdfChapter1p1.pdf
Chapter1p1.pdf
 
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 2
 
Geometry Section 2-2
Geometry Section 2-2Geometry Section 2-2
Geometry Section 2-2
 
logicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdf
logicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdflogicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdf
logicproof-141212042039-conversion-gate01.pdf
 

Más de NANDINI SHARMA

Más de NANDINI SHARMA (20)

Function and Recursively defined function
Function and Recursively defined functionFunction and Recursively defined function
Function and Recursively defined function
 
Relation in Discrete Mathematics
Relation in Discrete Mathematics Relation in Discrete Mathematics
Relation in Discrete Mathematics
 
Mathematical Induction in Discrete Structure
Mathematical Induction in Discrete StructureMathematical Induction in Discrete Structure
Mathematical Induction in Discrete Structure
 
SETS in Discrete Structure
SETS in Discrete StructureSETS in Discrete Structure
SETS in Discrete Structure
 
Predicate logic
Predicate logicPredicate logic
Predicate logic
 
Rules of Inference in Discrete Structure
Rules of Inference in Discrete StructureRules of Inference in Discrete Structure
Rules of Inference in Discrete Structure
 
Algebraic Structure Part 2 DSTL
Algebraic Structure Part 2 DSTLAlgebraic Structure Part 2 DSTL
Algebraic Structure Part 2 DSTL
 
FIELD in Discrete Structure
FIELD in Discrete StructureFIELD in Discrete Structure
FIELD in Discrete Structure
 
Algebraic Structure
Algebraic StructureAlgebraic Structure
Algebraic Structure
 
LATTICE in Discrete Structure
LATTICE in Discrete StructureLATTICE in Discrete Structure
LATTICE in Discrete Structure
 
DSTL: TREES AND GRAPH
DSTL: TREES AND GRAPHDSTL: TREES AND GRAPH
DSTL: TREES AND GRAPH
 
5 variable kmap questions
5 variable kmap questions5 variable kmap questions
5 variable kmap questions
 
Computer Graphics
Computer GraphicsComputer Graphics
Computer Graphics
 
Computer Architecture & Organization
Computer Architecture & OrganizationComputer Architecture & Organization
Computer Architecture & Organization
 
Database Management System
Database Management SystemDatabase Management System
Database Management System
 
Multimedia
Multimedia Multimedia
Multimedia
 
Number System (Computer)
Number System (Computer)Number System (Computer)
Number System (Computer)
 
Data Structure Part III
Data Structure Part IIIData Structure Part III
Data Structure Part III
 
Data Structure Part II
Data Structure Part IIData Structure Part II
Data Structure Part II
 
Computer Network Notes (Handwritten) UNIT 2
Computer Network Notes (Handwritten) UNIT 2Computer Network Notes (Handwritten) UNIT 2
Computer Network Notes (Handwritten) UNIT 2
 

Último

Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills KuwaitKuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
jaanualu31
 
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
HenryBriggs2
 
notes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.ppt
notes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.pptnotes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.ppt
notes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.ppt
MsecMca
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ssuser89054b
 
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Epec Engineered Technologies
 
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - NeometrixIntegrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Neometrix_Engineering_Pvt_Ltd
 

Último (20)

Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills KuwaitKuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
 
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdfdata_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
 
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
 
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.pptBlock diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
 
Rums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdf
Rums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdfRums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdf
Rums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdf
 
notes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.ppt
notes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.pptnotes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.ppt
notes on Evolution Of Analytic Scalability.ppt
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
 
Thermal Engineering Unit - I & II . ppt
Thermal Engineering  Unit - I & II . pptThermal Engineering  Unit - I & II . ppt
Thermal Engineering Unit - I & II . ppt
 
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
 
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
 
Air Compressor reciprocating single stage
Air Compressor reciprocating single stageAir Compressor reciprocating single stage
Air Compressor reciprocating single stage
 
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptxCOST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
 
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptxWork-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
 
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to ComputersComputer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
 
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech studentsAIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
 
Unleashing the Power of the SORA AI lastest leap
Unleashing the Power of the SORA AI lastest leapUnleashing the Power of the SORA AI lastest leap
Unleashing the Power of the SORA AI lastest leap
 
Hazard Identification (HAZID) vs. Hazard and Operability (HAZOP): A Comparati...
Hazard Identification (HAZID) vs. Hazard and Operability (HAZOP): A Comparati...Hazard Identification (HAZID) vs. Hazard and Operability (HAZOP): A Comparati...
Hazard Identification (HAZID) vs. Hazard and Operability (HAZOP): A Comparati...
 
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - NeometrixIntegrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
 
Minimum and Maximum Modes of microprocessor 8086
Minimum and Maximum Modes of microprocessor 8086Minimum and Maximum Modes of microprocessor 8086
Minimum and Maximum Modes of microprocessor 8086
 

Proposition Logic in Discrete Structure

  • 1. ` 1 Definition: Propositional Logic A proposition is a collection of declarative statements that has either a truth value "true” or a truth value "false". A propositional consists of propositional variables and connectives. We denote the propositional variables by capital letters (A, B, C etc). The connectives connect the propositional variables. Some examples of Propositions are given below: • "Man is Mortal", it returns truth value“TRUE” as T. • "12 + 9 = 3 − 2", it returns truth value “FALSE” as F. The following is not a Proposition • "A is less than 2". It is because unless we give a specific value of A, we cannot say whether the statement is true orfalse. Connectives In propositional logic generally we use five connectives which are OR (), AND (), Negation/ NOT (¬), Conditional or Implication / if-then (→), Bi conditional or If and only if (). Negation (¬) − The negation of a proposition A (written as ¬A) is false when A is true and is true when A is false. The truth table is as follows – A ¬A True False False True AND (  ) − The AND operation of two propositions A and B (written as A  B) is true if both the propositional variable A and B is true.
  • 2. ` 2 The truth table is as follows − A B A  B True True False True False False False True False False False True OR ()− The OR operation of two propositions A and B (written as A  B) is true if at least any of the propositional variable A or B is true. The truth table is as follows − A B A  B T T T T F T F T T F F F Implication / if-then (→) − An implication A→B is False if A is true and B is false. The rest cases are true.
  • 3. ` 3 The truth table is as follows − A B A → B True True True True False False False True True False False True If and only if ()− A B is bi-conditional logical connective which is true when p and q are both false or both are true. The truth table is as follows − A B A  B True True True True False False False True False False False True Well Formed Formulas (WFFs) The well formed formulas (WFFs) or statement formulas or logic formulas are defined recursively (or inductively) as below. 1. Propositional variables p,q,r,… and propositional constants F,T are well formed formulas. They are known as primitive WFFs.
  • 4. ` 4 2. If P and Q are WFFs then P,Q,P Q,P  Q,P → Q and P  Q are also WFFs. 3. All WFFs are obtained by the above procedures applied a finite number of times. For example, the following are WFFs p, p  q, p → q, p (q → r) (p  q)→ r, (p → q)→(q → p) Note: In order to avoid excessive use of parenthesis, we adopt an order of precedence for logical Operators. , , , → and  Tautologies A Tautology is a formula which is always true for every value of its propositional variables. Example − Prove [(A → B)  A] → B is a tautology The truth table is as follows − A B A → B (A → B)  A [(A → B)  A] → B True True True True True True False False False True False True True False True False False True False True As we can see every value of [(A → B)  A] → B is “True”, it is a tautology. Contradictions A Contradiction is a formula which is always false for every value of its propositional variables. Example − Prove (A VB)  [(¬A)  (¬B)] is a contradiction The truth table is as follows −
  • 5. ` 5 A B A  B ¬A ¬B (¬A)  (¬B) (A V B)  [(¬A)  (¬B)] True True True False False False False True False True False True False False False True True True False False False False False False True True True False As we can see every value of (A  B)  [(¬A)  (¬B)] is “False”, it is a Contradiction. Contingency A Contingency is a formula which has both some true and some false values for every value of its propositional variables. Example − Prove (A  B)  (¬A) a contingency The truth table is as follows − A B A  B ¬A (A  B)  (¬A) True True True False False True False True False False False True True True True False False False True False As we can see every value of (A  B)  (¬A) has both “True” and “False”, it is a contingency. Propositional Equivalences
  • 6. ` 6 Two statements X and Y are logically equivalent if any of the following two conditions − • The truth tables of each statement have the same truth values. • The bi-conditional statement X Y is a tautology. Example−Prove¬(A  B)and[(¬A)  (¬B)]are equivalent Testing by 1st method (Matching truth table) A B A  B ¬ (A  B) ¬A ¬B [(¬A)  (¬B)] True True True False False False False True False True False False True False False True True False True False False False False False True True True True Here, we can see the truth values of ¬ (A  B) and [(¬A)  (¬B)] are same, hence the statements are equivalent. Testing by 2nd method (Bi-conditionality) A B ¬ (A  B) [(¬A)  (¬B)] [¬ (A  B)]  [(¬A)  (¬B)] True True False False True True False False False True False True False False True False False True True True As [¬ (A  B)]  [(¬A)  (¬B)] is a tautology, the statements are equivalent.
  • 7. ` 8 Laws of Propositional Logic: S.No Name of Laws Primal Form Dual Form 1 Idempotent Law p  p  p p  p  p 2 Identity Law p  F  p p  T  p 3 Dominant Law p  T  T p  F  F 4 Complement Law p  p  T p  p  F 5 Commutative Law p  q  q  p p  q  q  p 6 Associative Law p  (q  r) (p  q) r p (q  r) (p  q) r 7 Distributive Law p(qr) (p  q)(p  r) p(q  r) (p q)(p r) 8 Absorption Law p  (p  q) p p (p  q) p 9 De Morgan’s Law (p  q) p q (p  q) p  q 10 Double Negation Law (p)  p - Logical Equivalences involving Conditional Statements Logical Equivalences involving Biconditional Statements Inverse, Converse, and Contra-positive A conditional statement has two parts − Hypothesis and Conclusion. Example of Conditional Statement − “If you do your homework, you will not be punished.” Here, "you do your homework" is the hypothesis and "you will
  • 8. ` 9 not be punished" is the conclusion. Inverse –An inverse of the conditional statement is the negation of both the hypothesis and the conclusion. If the statement is “If p, then q”, the inverse will be “If not p, then not q”. The inverse of “If you do your homework, you will not be punished” is “If you do not do your homework, you will be punished.” Converse−The converse of the conditional statement is computed by interchanging the hypothesis and the conclusion. If the statement is “If p, then q”, the inverse will be “If q, Then p”. The converse of "If you do your homework, you will not be punished" is "If you will not be punished, you do not do your homework”. Contra-positive –The contra-positive of the conditional is computed by interchanging the hypothesis and the conclusion of the inverse statement. If the statement is “If p, then q”, the inverse will be “If not q, then not p”. The Contra- positive of "If you do your homework, you will not be punished” is "If you will be punished, you do your home work”. Duality Principle Duality principle set states that for any true statement, the dual statement obtained by interchanging unions into intersections (and vice versa) and interchanging Universal set into Null set (and vice versa) is also true. If dual of any statement is the statement itself, it is said self-dual statement.
  • 10. ` 11 Elementary Product: A product of the variables and their negations in a formula is called an elementary product. If p and q are any two atomic variables, then p, p  q, q  p, p  q are some examples of elementary products. Elementary Sum: A sum of the variables and their negations in a formula is called an elementary sum. If P and Q are any two atomic variables, then p, p  q, q  p, p  q are some examples of elementary sums. Normal Forms: We can convert any proposition in two normal forms − 1. Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) 2.Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF) Conjunctive Normal Form A compound statement is in conjunctive normal form if it is obtained by operating AND among variables (negation of variables included) connected with ORs. Examples: 1. (p  q) (q  r) 2. (p  q  r) (s  r) Disjunctive Normal Form A compound statement is in disjunctive normal form if it is obtained by operating OR among variables (negation of variables included) connected with ANDs. Example: (p  q) (p  q) (p  q  r) Functionally Complete set A set of logical operators is called functionally complete if every compound proposition is logically equivalent to a compound proposition involving only this set of logical operators. ,,  form a functionally complete set of operators. Minterms: For two variables p and q there are 4 possible formulas which consist of conjunctions of p,q or it’s negation given by p  q, p  q, p  q, p  q
  • 11. ` 12 Maxterms: For two variables p and q there are 4 possible formulas which consist of disjunctions of p,q or its negation given by p  q, p  q, p  q, p  q Principal Disjunctive Normal Form: For a given formula an equivalent formula consisting of disjunctions of minterms only is known as principal disjunctive normal form (PDNF). Principal Conjunctive Normal Form: For a given formula an equivalent formula consisting of conjunctions of maxterms only is known as principal conjunctive normal form (PCNF). Problems:
  • 12. ` 13
  • 13. ` 14 Rule of inference to build arguments: RuleP: A premise may be introduced at point in the derivation Rule T: A formula S may be introduced in a derivation if S is a tautologically implied by any one or more of the preceeding formulas in the derivation. Rule CP: If we can derive S from R and a set of premises, then we can derive R →S from the set of premises alone. Rule CP is also called deduction theoem.
  • 15. ` 16
  • 16. ` 17 Quantifiers: The variable of predicates is quantified by quantifiers. There are two types of quantifier in Predicate logic − Universal Quantifier and Existential Quantifier. Universal Quantifier: Universal quantifier states that the statements within its scope are true for every value of the specific variable. It is denoted by the symbol ∀. ∀x P(x) is read as for every value of x, P(x) is true. Example: "Man is mortal" can be transformed into the propositional form ∀x P(x) where P(x) is the predicate which denotes x is mortal and the universe of discourse is all men. Existential Quantifier: Existential quantifier states that the statements within its scope are true for some values of the specific variable. It is denoted by the symbol ∃.∃x P(x) is read as for some values of x, P(x) is true.
  • 17. ` 18 Example: "Some people are dishonest" can be transformed into the propositional form ∃x P(x) where P(x) is the predicate which denotes x is dishonest and the universe of discourse is some people. Nested Quantifiers: If we use a quantifier that appears within the scope of another quantifier, it is called nested quantifier.
  • 18. ` 19 Symbolize the following statements: (a)All men are mortal (b)All the world loves alover (c) X is the father of mother of Y (d)No cats has atail (e) Some people who trust others are rewarded Solution:
  • 19. ` 20
  • 20. ` 21
  • 21. 1