Information Ecosystem Standards
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
0 recomendaciones•279 vistas
The document proposes creating a working group within Pistoia to standardize terminology and data formats. The working group would first create a list of existing standards and define their coverage. It would then gather user requirements from Pistoia members and use these to prioritize areas for standardization. The working group would perform a gap analysis to anchor requirements to standards and develop criteria to evaluate and drive the development of standards.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a Information Ecosystem Standards
Similar a Information Ecosystem Standards (20)
Más de Pistoia Alliance
Más de Pistoia Alliance (20)
Último
Último (20)
Information Ecosystem Standards
- 1. PM 4: The Standards Landscape – Status, gaps, redundancies. What needs to be done? David Brown Ingrid Schmid Jesus del Valle Parthiban Srinivasan Michael Braxenthaler Todd Vision Susanna Sansone Vision: Pistoia’s rubberstamped standards - endorsed by Pistoia’s members, - used by Pistoia’s members internally, and - to influence adoption by vendors/suppliers How to implement this? - Create a Pistoia WG (extending the scope of VSI?), with all interested parties What are the first steps/tasks for this WG?
- 2. 1. Contribute to the creation/maintenance of a list of standards - What is out there: terminologies, file format, minimal requirements - Define their coverage 2. Gather concrete user requirements - Collect ‘case studies’, real needs from the diverse Pistoia’s members - Use them to drive priority areas, => e.g. this (break out) group’s members have already expressed an interest in contributing to the VSI synonyms dictionary (see Harland et al paper, DDT) 3. Anchor the requirements to standards - Gap analysis, area of overlaps and coverage etc…. 4. Develop criteria to evaluate standards and drive their developments - Metrics - Architecture criteria: versioning, backward compatibility, extendibility, coverage etc… - General criteria: size of the community, it stability, structure and funds, tool support, involvement of regulators (mainly in clinical but not/less in biological domains), documentation, ease of adoption etc… - Develop and assign KPIs - Manifesto - Agile development of standards, including best practices for the development, governance, rules of engagements etc.