The presentation will cover the following items:
Release Readiness criteria as a part of a master test plan, their types and details. (~ 30 min)
Release readiness criteria appliance and areas of influence. (~ 5 min)
Quality report and quality metrics + their connection to release readiness criteria. (~ 15 min)
Concluding release readiness. (~1 min)
Questions (~ 10 min)
2. 22
11 Years general working experience in IT/QA (30+ projects)
----------
•QA Consultant at Ciklum Interactive
•QA Manager (Manual)
•Automated Testing Manager
•Load Testing Manager
•Project Manager
----------
•Hobbies: Job, Wife and 2 children, Sport
----------
Skype: vladimir.primakov
Linkedin: ua.linkedin.com/in/vladimirprimakov/
Email: v.v.primakov@gmail.com
Some Words About Me
Volodymyr Prymakov (Vladimir Primakov)
3. 33
The presentation will cover the following items:
• Release Readiness criteria as a part of a master test plan, their
types and details. (~ 30 min)
• Release readiness criteria appliance and areas of influence. (~ 5
min)
• Quality report and quality metrics + their connection to release
readiness criteria. (~ 15 min)
• Concluding release readiness. (~1 min)
• Questions (~ 10 min)
Presentation’s Structure
Presentation Plan
7. 77
Short Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% Features of Any
Priority
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
8. 88
Short Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% Features of Any
Priority
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
9. 99
Short Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% Features of Any
Priority
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
10. 1010
Short Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% Features of Any
Priority
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
11. 1111
Short Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% Features of Any
Priority
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
12. 1212
Short Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% Features of Any
Priority
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
13. 1313
Short Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% Features of Any
Priority
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
14. 1414
Expanded Example
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High
(Blocker/Critical)
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (Major) Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Low (Normal/Trivial) Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
15. 1515
Test Deepness
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High
(Blocker/Critical)
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (Major) Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Low (Normal/Trivial) Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
Test Deepness
16. 1616
Test Deepness
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
TEST DEEPNESS / DETALIZATION
Test Case Based Thought Out Test
Detailed Exploratory Test
Happy Path Exploratory test
Smoke test
Nothing
17. 1717
Test Coverage
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High
(Blocker/Critical)
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (Major) Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Low (Normal/Trivial) Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
Test Coverage
19. 1919
MaximumFail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High
(Blocker/Critical)
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (Major) Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Low (Normal/Trivial) Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
Fail Rate %
20. 2020
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
High (Blocker / Critical) 0 0 0 * *
Medium (Major) 0 0 0 * *
Low (Normal/Trivial) 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA
*if too many bugs are in place for the functionality – the bugs number can be
considered for any specific case separately
21. 2121
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
High (Blocker / Critical) 0 0 0 * *
Medium (Major) 0 0 0 * *
Low (Normal/Trivial) 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA
*if too many bugs are in place for the functionality – the bugs number can be
considered for any specific case separately
22. 2222
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
High (Blocker / Critical) 0 0 0 * *
Medium (Major) 0 0 0 * *
Low (Normal/Trivial) 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA
*if too many bugs are in place for the functionality – the bugs number can be
considered for any specific case separately
23. 2323
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
High (Blocker / Critical) 0 0 0 * *
Medium (Major) 0 0 0 * *
Low (Normal/Trivial) 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA
24. 2424
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
Features of Any Priority 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA (short and not so strict)
25. 2525
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
Features of Any Priority 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA (short and not so strict)
Status: FAIL RATE %
Blocked
26. 2626
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
Features of Any Priority 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA (short and not so strict)
Status: FAIL RATE %
Blocked
Failed Release Readiness Criteria
27. 2727
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
Features of Any Priority 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA (short and not so strict)
Status: FAIL RATE %
Blocked
Failed Release Readiness Criteria
Status: Pass Rate %
Failed With Acceptable Bugs
28. 2828
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
Features of Any Priority 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA (short and not so strict)
Status: FAIL RATE %
Blocked
Failed Release Readiness Criteria
Status: Pass Rate %
Failed With Acceptable Bugs
29. 2929
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
Features of Any Priority 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA (short and not so strict)
Status: FAIL RATE %
Blocked
Failed Release Readiness Criteria
Status: Pass Rate %
Failed With Acceptable Bugs
30. 3030
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Functionality Priority
Maximum Allowable Bugs Number
(Story, Improvement,
New Feature)
Blocker
Bugs
Critical
Bugs
Major
Bugs
Normal
Bugs
Trivial
Bugs
Features of Any Priority 0 0 * * *
PASS CRITERIA (short and not so strict)
Status: FAIL RATE %
Blocked
Failed Release Readiness Criteria
Status: Pass Rate %
Failed With Acceptable Bugs
Passed
31. 3131
Fail Rate %
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Coverage
Fail Rate is 29%, But should be 0%
32. 3232
Test Environment Coverage
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Functionality
Priority
Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High
(Blocker/Critical)
Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (Major) Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Low (Normal/Trivial) Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
High 100%
(all high priority
test
environments)
All priorities Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium Please See test environments related criteria
Low Please See test environments related criteria
Test Environments Coverage
33. 3333
Test Environment Coverage
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environments
Type OS Browser/Device Resolution Priority
PC Win 7 Chrome 1920*1080 Highest
PC Win 8 (metro) IE 10 1920*1080
HighMac MacOS Firefox 1920*1080
iPad iOs7 iPad 4 2048*1536
Mac MacOS Safari 2880*1800
MediumPC Win 7 IE 11 1366*768
iPad iOs7 iPad 2 1024*768
PC Linux Firefox 1366*768
Low
34. 3434
Test Environment Coverage
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environments
Type OS Browser/Device Resolution Priority
PC Win 7 Chrome 1920*1080 Highest
PC Win 8 (metro) IE 10 1920*1080
HighMac MacOS Firefox 1920*1080
iPad iOs7 iPad 4 2048*1536
Mac MacOS Safari 2880*1800
MediumPC Win 7 IE 11 1366*768
iPad iOs7 iPad 2 1024*768
PC Linux Firefox 1366*768
Low
There is only 1 highest
priority environment so the
coverage, which it gives for
the priority, is 100%.
35. 3535
Test Environment Coverage
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
Test Environments
Type OS Browser/Device Resolution Priority
PC Win 7 Chrome 1920*1080 Highest
PC Win 8 (metro) IE 10 1920*1080
HighMac MacOS Firefox 1920*1080
iPad iOs7 iPad 4 2048*1536
Mac MacOS Safari 2880*1800
MediumPC Win 7 IE 11 1366*768
iPad iOs7 iPad 2 1024*768
PC Linux Firefox 1366*768
Low
1 environment of 3 high priority
environments gives ~ 33% coverage.
All these environments together
gives 100% coverage for the priority.
39. 3939
DEFINTION OF DONE (EXAMPLE)
User story reviewed & adjusted correspondingly
Unit-test created and passed
Integration test created and passed
Pear review passed
UX-review passed
Manual Test Passed
End User Test Passed…
Definition of Done
Criteria for New Functionality Testing
45. 4545
Example
Criteria for Regression Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Scenario
Priority
Minimum
Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionalit
y Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (That
might be affected
by recent product
changes)
Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Other Medium Happy path
Exploratory
testing
50% 0%
High See test environments related criteria
Medium See test environments related criteria
Low See test environments related criteria
46. 4646
Example
Criteria for Regression Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Scenario
Priority
Minimum
Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionalit
y Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (That
might be affected
by recent product
changes)
Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Other Medium Happy path
Exploratory
testing
50% 0%
High See test environments related criteria
Medium See test environments related criteria
Low See test environments related criteria
47. 4747
Example
Criteria for Regression Testing
Test Environment
Priority
Coverage of Test
Environments
Tested Scenario
Priority
Minimum
Test
Deepness
Minimum
Functionalit
y Coverage
Maximum
Fail Rate %
The Highest one 100% High Detailed
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Medium (That
might be affected
by recent product
changes)
Happy path
Exploratory
testing
100% 0%
Other Medium Happy path
Exploratory
testing
50% 0%
High See test environments related criteria
Medium See test environments related criteria
Low See test environments related criteria
48. 4848
Criteria for Test Environment Testing
Possible Test Environment Ingredients
Internet Speed Antivirus, Firewalls
Plugins
Integration with other
applications and API
User Rights
Runtimes
External Devices
Screen Resolutions and Modes
Hardware and Software Platforms and Modes
Web-browsers
Mobile Software Platforms
Mobile Software Platforms
External Libraries
Hardware
Characteristics and
Capacity
Robots (HD,
Software,
Capabilities)
50. 5050
Criteria for Test Environment Testing
Product-wide Test
Deepness
Full Regression
Full Regression for
functionality of certain
priority
Main product Flows test /
User Acceptance Test /
Cover test
Selective Regression
Smoke Test
51. 5151
Criteria for Test Environment Testing
Coverage of
Test Environments
Product-wide Test Deepness
52. 5252
Criteria for Test Environment Testing
Coverage of
Test Environments
Product-wide Test Deepness
Fail Rate
53. 5353
Criteria for Test Environment Testing
Test Environment Priority Target (functionality) Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Coverage of
Test
environments
MaximumFa
il Rate %
Highest Please see the release readiness-criteria for new functionality and old
functionality
High New functionality Please see release readiness-criteria for new
functionality
Old (Regression-related)
functionality
Selective Regression
and/or
Main product Flows
test
100% 0%
Medium New and Old (Regression-
related) functionality
Product-wide Smoke
test
75%* 0%
Low New and Old (Regression-
related) functionality
Product-wide Smoke
test
50%* 0%
Example
*Not covered environments may be covered next release and so on
54. 5454
Criteria for Test Environment Testing
Test Environment Priority Target (functionality) Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Coverage of
Test
environments
MaximumFa
il Rate %
Highest Please see the release readiness-criteria for new functionality and old
functionality
High New functionality Please see release readiness-criteria for new
functionality
Old (Regression-related)
functionality
Selective Regression
and/or
Main product Flows
test
100% 0%
Medium New and Old (Regression-
related) functionality
Product-wide Smoke
test
75%* 0%
Low New and Old (Regression-
related) functionality
Product-wide Smoke
test
50%* 0%
Example
*Not covered environments may be covered next release and so on
55. 5555
Criteria for Test Environment Testing
Test Environment Priority Target (functionality) Minimum Test
Deepness
Minimum
Coverage of
Test
environments
MaximumFa
il Rate %
Highest Please see the release readiness-criteria for new functionality and old
functionality
High New functionality Please see release readiness-criteria for new
functionality
Old (Regression-related)
functionality
Selective Regression
and/or
Main product Flows
test
100% 0%
Medium New and Old (Regression-
related) functionality
Product-wide Smoke
test
75%* 0%
Low New and Old (Regression-
related) functionality
Product-wide Smoke
test
50%* 0%
Example
*Not covered environments may be covered next release and so on
56. 5656
Criteria for Unit & Integration Testing
Test Coverage
Fail Rate
GUI-LESS
Functionality
GUI
Functionality*
Unit & Integration Testing
Test Coverage
Fail Rate
*Criteria may be not so strict, because GUI functionality can be also manually tested
57. 5757
Criteria for Unit & Integration Testing
Example
Integration Testing or Unit-Testing
Priority of
functionality
Minimum
Functionality
Coverage
MaximumFail
Rate %
High 100% 0%*
Medium 0% 0%*
*Depends on severity of the problems found in
integration/unit testing
58. 5858
Criteria for Special Types of testing
Type of testing* Sufficient?
(yes/no)
Passed? Conclusions
Load/Performance
testing (client/server
side)
NOT READY
Security Testing NOT READY
UX-Testing READY
(Accessibility Testing) NOT READY
GENERAL CONCLUSSION: NOT READY
* Usually has separate release readiness criteria, but in any case it should be sufficient
and passed.
Special types of testing, which are obligatory to be conducted and passed
69. 6969
All Not Closed Bugs – Not-Assigned to any Sprint
Number of Bugs and their severity
70. 7070
Number of Bugs and their severity
All Not Closed Bugs – Not-Assigned to any Sprint
71. 7171
Bugs List (for All not-closed bugs) – That fails release readiness criteria
Number of Bugs and their severity
Bugs List (for All not-closed bugs) – That fails release readiness criteria
Assigned to sprints
Not-Assigned to sprints
72. 7272
Number of Bugs and their severity
Make a separate release readiness
conclusion for this criterion type
73. 7373
New Functionality Statuses (From Tasks Management System)
New Functionality Testing & Results
Features Statuses (Current release)
74. 7474
New Functionality Statuses (From Tasks Management System)
New Functionality Testing & Results
Features Statuses (Current release)
Not-Resolved Features By Components
(Current release)
86. 8686
GUI-less functionality
Unit & Integration testing & Results
Type of testing Coverage Fail Percentage Conclusions
Unit-test 50% 0% READY
Integration test 100% 0% READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: READY
87. 8787
GUI-less functionality
Unit & Integration testing & Results
Type of testing Coverage Fail Percentage Conclusions
Unit-test 50% 0% READY
Integration test 100% 0% READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: READY
88. 8888
GUI-less functionality
Unit & Integration testing & Results
Type of testing Coverage Fail Percentage Conclusions
Unit-test 50% 0% READY
Integration test 100% 0% READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: READY
89. 8989
GUI-less functionality
Unit & Integration testing & Results
Type of testing Coverage Fail Percentage Conclusions
Unit-test 50% 0% READY
Integration test 100% 0% READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: READY
90. 9090
Special Types of Testing & Results
Type of testing* Sufficient?
(yes/no)
Passed? Conclusions
Load/Performance
testing (client/server
side)
NOT READY
Security Testing NOT READY
UX-Testing READY
(Accessibility Testing) NOT READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: NOT READY
* Usually has separate release readiness criteria, but in any case it should be sufficient
and passed.
91. 9191
Special Types of Testing & Results
Type of testing* Sufficient?
(yes/no)
Passed? Conclusions
Load/Performance
testing (client/server
side)
NOT READY
Security Testing NOT READY
UX-Testing READY
(Accessibility Testing) NOT READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: NOT READY
* Usually has separate release readiness criteria, but in any case it should be sufficient
and passed.
92. 9292
Special Types of Testing & Results
Type of testing* Sufficient?
(yes/no)
Passed? Conclusions
Load/Performance
testing (client/server
side)
NOT READY
Security Testing NOT READY
UX-Testing READY
(Accessibility Testing) NOT READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: NOT READY
* Usually has separate release readiness criteria, but in any case it should be sufficient
and passed.
93. 9393
Special Types of Testing & Results
Type of testing* Sufficient?
(yes/no)
Passed? Conclusions
Load/Performance
testing (client/server
side)
NOT READY
Security Testing NOT READY
UX-Testing READY
(Accessibility Testing) NOT READY
GENERAL RELEASE READINESS CONCLUSSION: NOT READY
* Usually has separate release readiness criteria, but in any case it should be sufficient
and passed.
94. 9494
Concluding Release Readiness
Criterion Status
1. Number of Bugs and their severity
NOT READY
2. New Functionality Testing & Results
READY
3. Regression Testing & Results
READY
4. Test Environments Testing & Results
NOT READY
5. Unit & Integration testing & Results
READY
6. Special Types of Testing & Results
NOT READY
GENERAL CONCLUSSION: NOT READY
95. 9595
Concluding Release Readiness
Criterion Status
1. Number of Bugs and their severity
NOT READY
2. New Functionality Testing & Results
READY
3. Regression Testing & Results
READY
4. Test Environments Testing & Results
NOT READY
5. Unit & Integration testing & Results
READY
6. Special Types of Testing & Results
NOT READY
GENERAL CONCLUSSION: NOT READY