We attack the problem of user fatigue in using an interactive genetic algorithm to evolve user interfaces in the XUL interface definition language. The genetic algorithm combines a set of computable user interface design metrics with subjective user input to guide the evolution of interfaces. User interface specifications are encoded as individuals in a genetic algorithm’s population and their fitness is computed from a weighted combination of user interface design guidelines and user input. We show that we can reduce human fatigue in interactive genetic algorithms (the number of choices needing to be made by the designer), by 1) only asking the user to pick two user interfaces from among ten shown on the display and 2) by asking the user to make the choice once every t generations. Our goal is to provide user interface designers with a tool that can be used to explore innovation and creativity in the design space of user interfaces and make it easier for end-users to further customize their user interface without programming knowledge.

1. Interactively Evolving User Interfaces Juan Quiroz Committee: Dr. Sushil Louis Dr. Sergiu Dascalu Dr. Swatee Naik

7. User Evaluation: Subjective Fitness 100 75 15 80 20 8 38 53 82

8. User Evaluation: Ranking 1 5 6 9 3 2 4 8 7

9. User Evaluation: Tournaments A B Fitness A > Fitness B

19. Lagoon MoveTo Panel

24. 1: Fitness Evaluation Best Worst

30. Which selection type is the most effective for this problem?

31. Who from the population do we display for user evaluation? Fitness Convergence Convergence to Blue UIs

32. How often do we ask for user input? User input every t th generation Fitness convergence High values of t Low values of t

33. How often do we ask for user input? User input every t th generation Convergence to blue UIs High values of t Low values of t

35. Results

37. What leads to the drop in average performance?

38. Generated UIs: Simulated User

39. Generated UIs: Simulated User

40. Generated UIs: User3

41. Generated UIs: User3

44. Demo