The document discusses the legal maxim that "for every wrong there is a remedy." It states that when a person's rights are violated, they are entitled to equitable remedies under the law to enforce their rights. Some examples of remedies discussed include damages awards, injunctions, declaratory judgments, and compensation. The document provides several cases as examples where a plaintiff's rights were violated and they received a legal remedy such as damages.

1. RAHUL GAUR

2. It is a latin maxim which means for every
wrong law provides a remedy. Principle
contemplated in the maxim is that, when a
person's right is violated the victim will
have an equitable remedy under law. The
maxim also states that the person whose
right is being infringed has a right to
enforce the infringed right through any
action before a court.

3. For every wrong there is a remedy.
Law dictionary defines it as,” Where there
is a right there is a remedy.”

4. The law of torts.
The Trust Act
Section 9 of CPC- entitles a civil court to
entertain all kinds of suits unless they are
prohibited.
The Specific Relief Act- provides for
equitable remedies like specific
performance of contracts, injunction,
declaratory suits.

5. The loss must ne unliquidated.
The main remedy must be for damages.
The nature of act varies from situation to
situation.

6.  If there is a breach of a moral right only.
 If the right and remedy both were in within the
jurisdiction of the Common Law Courts.
 Where due to his own negligence a party
either destroyed or allowed to be destroyed,
the evidence in his own favor or waived his
right to an equitable remedy.

7. The plaintiff had sufficient fund in his
account in the defendant’s bank. In spite of
this, the banker had refused to honor his
cheque. It was held that the bank was
liable to pay damages to the plaintiff, as his
legal right is being violated.

8. The defendant, a reputed officer in a
parliamentary election, wrongfully refused to
take the vote of plaintiff, although the plaintiff
did not suffer any loss by this refusal because
the candidate for whom he wanted to vote
won in spite of that. Holt, C.J said, – “every
injuria imports a damage though it does not
cost the party one farthing”. So the Defendant
was held liable to pay damages to plaintiff.

9. The petitioner Bhim Singh an MLA of j&k
assembly was illegally detained by the
police while he was going to attend the
Assemble Session and was thus
prevented from exercising his legal right to
attend the assembly. The supreme court of
India awarded him RS 50,000 by way of
compensation for violation of his
fundamental right.