Vip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dewas
Kellogg Strategic Use and Abuse of SaaS Metrics
1. The Strategic Use and Abuse of SaaS
Metrics with Dave Kellogg
Dave Kellogg
EIR
Balderton Capital
R3.1
2. Why I Wanted To Give This Presentation
● I’ve been a C-level executive for >25 years
● I’ve sat on ~10 boards
● I’ve been to countless e-staffs, QBRs, and board meetings (1K+)
● I’m naturally drawn to metrics
● And I’ve seen a lot of problems
● Many are tactical (to be discussed another day)
○ The mechanics of presentation, formatting, charting, info density, and cognitive load
● Others are strategic
2
3. The numbers don’t lie,
but the stories well tell around them
sometimes do.
3
4. Self Introduction
Past Employment
● CMO, $30M to $1B, Business Objects
● SVP/GM, $0.5B out of $3.0B, Salesforce
● CEO, $0 to $80M, MarkLogic
● CEO, $8 to $50M, Host Analytics
Today’s Work
● EIR, Balderton Capital
● Director, 10x including Alation, Jiminny,
Nuxeo, Profisee, Scoro
● Advisor, 20x including Tableau, MongoDB,
Recorded Future, Bluecore, dbt Labs,
Logikcull, Pigment
● Angel/investor, incl. Alation, Cube, DataGrail,
Faros, FloQast, Hex, Skyflow, Unaric
● Author, Kellblog
4
5. Today’s Three Topics
● Fifteen signs of strategic SaaS metrics problem
● A SaaS metrics maturity model
● Traversing the five layers to increase your SaaS metrics maturity
5
7. Fifteen Signs of a Metrics Problem, I
● Bludgeoning: numbers are used to bludgeon management
● Misleading: metrics used to obscure, not enlighten
7
8. Misleading Metrics, Selective Highlighting
8
“We’re 96% of plan”
“We’re 60% of new logo ARR,
93% of expansion ARR,
73% of new ARR, and
60% of net new ARR”
9. Fifteen Signs of a Metrics Problem, I
● Déjà vu: you go to the same board meeting three quarters in a row
● Rat-holing: you discuss the metrics, not the business using metrics
● Semantics: what do “best case” and “commit” mean again?
9
● Bludgeoning: numbers are used to bludgeon management
● Misleading: metrics used to obscure, not enlighten
10. Semantics: What Do FC, Best-Case, and Commit Mean?
● BoD: What’s the forecast for new ARR
this quarter?
● Sales VP: $4.3M, with a best case of
$5.0M.
● BoD: What’s the most likely outcome?
● Sales VP: $4.5M.
● BoD: What are you really going to do?
● Sales VP: I think we can do $4.7M.
● BoD: What’s the worst case?
● Sales VP: $3.5M.
10
11. Fifteen Signs of a Metrics Problem, I
● Recalculation: board members recalculate metrics themselves
● Inexplicability: the company is not performing, but numbers don’t show why
11
● Bludgeoning: numbers are used to bludgeon management
● Misleading: metrics used to obscure, not enlighten
● Déjà vu: you go to the same board meeting three quarters in a row
● Rat-holing: you discuss the metrics, not the business using metrics
● Semantics: what do “best case” and “commit” mean again?
12. Fifteen Signs of a Metrics Problem, II
● Dissonance: the words don’t match the music
● Innumeracy: only the CFO and the ops people present metrics
● Déjà vu: you go to the same board meeting three quarters in a row
12
14. Fifteen Signs of a Metrics Problem, II
● Disconnect: metrics are unlinked to strategy
14
● Dissonance: the words don’t match the music
● Innumeracy: only the CFO and the ops people present metrics
● Déjà vu: you go to the same board meeting three quarters in a row
16. Fifteen Signs of a Metrics Problem, II
● Piecemealing: numbers are evaluated in isolation, not holistically
● Mis-benchmarking: comparing to the wrong companies
● Causality: correlation confused with causation
● Torture: selecting and twisting the data to justify prior conclusions
16
● Dissonance: the words don’t match the music
● Innumeracy: only the CFO and the ops people present metrics
● Déjà vu: you go to the same board meeting three quarters in a row
● Disconnect: metrics are unlinked to strategy
18. Twisted SaaS Metrics Example
● Our churn rate is only 5%
○ Ergo 20-year LT and amazing LTV/CAC
● Net churn is 25%
● Gross churn is 29%
● Logo churn is only 5%, because of …
● Four $1 renewals (to hide the problem)
18
See: https://kellblog.com/2020/09/02/churn-is-dead-long-live-net-dollar-retention-slides-from-my-saastr-2020-presentation/
19. Do People Actually Do This?
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0njymB06JB8
19
21. What’s Really Going On Here?
● There’s no shared metrics foundation
○ What metrics mean, how they are calculated, and why they matter
● There’s no trust
○ Data and calculations, tell the real story, and aren’t used to mislead or to bludgeon
● Metrics are not integral to strategy
○ Financing tool only, not linked into OKRs, and no leading indicators
● The culture is not metrics-driven
○ Numeracy as prerequisite for conversations about the business
● Metrics are not being used define trajectory and long-term goals
○ We may not agree on what we’re trying to build, trade-off, and sequence
21
22. A SaaS Metrics Maturity Model
•Models for long-term trajectory, sequencing, and trade-offs
Level 5: Trajectory
•Culture of data-driven decision making
Level 4: Culture
•Goals, OKRs, and leading indicators
Level 3: Strategic Linkage
•Templates, cadence, and continuous improvement
Level 2: Trust
•Definitions, calculations, and semantics
Level 1: Foundation
22
23. Improving SaaS Metrics Maturity is a Journey
23
● Layer 1 can be measured in quarters, not weeks
● Change management calls for iron will
● May require staff upgrades
● Will change regular meeting cadence and agendas
● Requires trust and the willingness to be vulnerable
25. 1. Lay The Foundation
● Definitions and calculations
○ Pipeline stages, forecast categories, close dates, values, SaaS metrics, …
● Semantics
○ What do words like best case, forecast, commit, and downside mean?
● Rework of underlying systems
○ Example: GL to deliver P&L in the standard SaaS structure
● Benchmarks
○ Which are available and most applicable to our size and aspirations?
● Suggest offloading to metrics committee(s)
○ At both board and QBR level
25
26. 2. Build Trust
● Template, templates, templates
○ Metrics selection & presentation
○ History & context
○ Footnotes: never hide exceptions
○ Levels: summary vs. drill-down
● Cadence: which templates used at which meetings?
○ Weekly e-staff
○ Quarterly business review
○ Post-quarter board meeting
● Continuous improvement
○ Fix data at the source
○ Improve templates as you use them
26
27. 3. Link to Strategy
● Identify your top challenges
● Define 4-6 strategic goals (OKRs)
○ Example: average sales price (ASP) as key
result (KR) for up-market push
● Find KPIs that lead the KRs
○ How will we know if it’s working?
○ Is the bow coming through the wind?
○ Example: pipeline ASP, ASP win rates
27
28. 4. Build a Metrics Culture
● Numeracy as a prerequisite
● Knowing the numbers
● Cadence and discipline
● Not conversations about the metrics, but
conversations about the business
● Wary of oversimplification
○ Limits of interpretation
○ Emphasis on triangulation
28
29. 5. Agree on Strategic Trajectory
● Timeframe
● Sequencing
● Convergence
● Trade-offs
● Drivers
● Scenarios
29
Using models and benchmarks to establish mid- to long-term
agreement on what you’re trying to build
30. Conclusions
● SaaS metrics can be tools of
enlightenment, oppression, or obfuscation
● We’ve discussed 15 symptoms of a SaaS
metrics problem
● We’ve introduced a five-layer SaaS
metrics maturity model
● We’ve discussed things you can do at
each level to build your metrics maturity
● I wish you all well on the journey
30
31. Resources
● Blogs (alphabetical)
○ Clouded Judgement by Jamin Ball
○ Kellblog by Dave Kellogg
○ Mostly Metrics by CJ Gustafson
○ OnlyCFO’s Software World
○ SaaSletter by Matt Harney
○ The Next Big Teng by Janelle Teng
○ The SaaS CFO by Ben Murray
○ The SaaStr Blog
● Podcasts (alphabetical)
○ SaaS Talk with the Metrics Brothers by Ray Rike and Dave Kellogg
○ The SaaStr Podcast
31