This document discusses the proposed Digital Economy Act (DEA) in the UK, which aims to address online copyright infringement. It notes concerns that the bill favors content industry interests over citizens' rights. Key issues include lack of due process, proportionality of criminal penalties for civil infringement, and potential punishment of innocent IP address holders. It also raises worries about the effect on public Wi-Fi access and the digital divide. The document analyzes lawmaking around new technologies and next steps like developing codes of practice to implement the bill.
2. Making UK copyright law
Bismark: sausages and laws
Mandelson meets Geffen
DEB November 2009
The Mandelson clause
The Lib Dem Lord (and the BPI web blocking clause)
The Labour Lord “I regret to say that during the course of our
consideration of the Bill, we have seen one of the worst examples in
my memory of the political parties being captured by a producer
interest.”
The Lib Dem revolt (emergency motion at conference)
DEA wash up April 2010
4. Not about
Abolishing copyright
Impoverishing creators
5. Is 3 strikes in DEB?
Probably but not as we know it Jim
Details tba
Vague language
Any “online location” “likely” to host or be “location via” which
infringement takes place (search engines, libraries, universities?)
6. What is in it?
Technical measures
Details tba in codes e.g. suspension of accounts, blocking user
access to sites, throttling
Website blocking
By court order
7. Problems
Suspicion
Due process
no prior access to court, appeal after, guilt assumed, details tba
Proportionality
Civil infringement, criminal penalty. ECJ Promusicae
Punish the innocent
IP address not infringer
9. Emergence
Intermediary liability
Public wi fi dead?
Pubs, airports, hotels, libraries, universities
Digital divide
Gordon Brown, March 2010: "21% of UK adults have never accessed the
internet. That‟s over a fifth trapped in a second tier of citizenship,
denied what I increasingly think of as a fundamental freedom in the
modern world: to be part of the internet and technology revolution".
10. Lawmaking in technicolour
The worldwide view from Twitter #debll #deact
28,000 wrote to MPs
The empty chamber and the whip seen live iPlayer
The wash up – not for controversial laws
Lib Dem conference reversed front bench
MPs when confused turned to music cos for advice (Eg.
My own MP was for and against it)
12. What next?
Most front bench MPs don‟t get the Net
What it is used for
How it works
How it should be regulated
Watching them regulating us
Ofcom duty to work on the „codes‟
Great case study for my book chapter
13. Gene: I want him in custody by teatime.
Alex: Why?
Gene: Cos he‟s guilty as sin and a dangerous downloading commie…