Is The Death Penalty Effective Argumentative Essay

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty
The death penalty, death as a consequence given by law due to the committing of a serious crime.
The death penalty is given to those who commit serious crimes such as treason, terrorism, drug
trafficking, and murder. The death penalty is a horrific consequence that has an abundance of
improving to do for the sake of everyone. If the death penalty system isn't changed soon more
innocent people will continue to die due to the mistake of the court. A death penalty is a form of
execution for those who have committed serious crimes, the effect of this all is obviously death,
as well as an extreme cost of money and innocent people's life at risk. The world without the death
penalty is an improved world, no revenge, no hatred, no waste of money and most importantly no
more court organized deaths. For example, improving the death penalty will decrease what
taxpayers pay for it, and decrease botched executions. It provides a safer world for everyone.
Second chances are often given to many people, it wouldn't be a bad idea to give those who have
committed a serious crime a second chance. Allowing them to have a second chance will open their
minds to the idea of bettering for both the world and themselves. The opposing side would believe
that they don't deserve a second chance because what they have done is unforgivable. However,
there are companies that do believe in second chances for felonies; Companies such as, AT&T,
In–N–Out, Ikea and IHOP support hiring felons. Although
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Should the Death Penalty Be Legal? Essay
There is a lot of controversy about whether the death penalty should be legal or not. It is widely
used, with only 18 out of the 50 states having abolished it, but should it be permitted, regardless of
the popularity of it? The answer is no. It should be abolished because it demeans life, is cruel, prison
is a better punishment, and it is not effective.
Steve Earle once said "My objection to the death penalty is based on the idea that this is a
democracy, and in a democracy the government is me, and if the government kills somebody then
I'm killing somebody." The death penalty demeans life. It makes life seem like something that can
just be thrown away if you do something wrong, when in reality, it is something that should be
carefully...show more content...
"There is no man so bad that he cannot be made good for something." says Jean–Jacques Rousseau
in his book, The Social Contract. Everyone can become a better person in some way or another.
People make very bad decisions sometimes and there is nothing anyone can do to prevent that, but
once this happens, then, we can work it out with the person so that they realize that what they did
is wrong and that they can do so much better. If they are simply put to death, then there is no way
for them to improve. Even if they live, and they do not improve in who they are, then we can all be
calm in knowing that they had the opportunity to. "The death penalty is the number one killer of
killers." said Mokokoma Mokhonoana.
A prisoner's life consists of twenty–three hours per day in a tiny, empty concrete cell, with one hour
of daily exercise in a small concrete swimming pool; they have no access to other inmates, and only
rare contact with guards, who say nothing to them; they can see nothing of the outside world except
a tiny sliver of sky. The death penalty as punishment is an unnecessary threat compared to the
dullness of what prison life is like.
Finally, the death penalty is not effective. If it really and truly worked, there would be no more crime
deservant of the death penalty. All of it would have stopped when the death penalty was first
legalized. If criminals feared death, they wouldn't commit the crime in the first

Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty
Olivier Benoit
Professor Marlene Lang
English 101
6 November 2017
Death Penalty The death penalty is a heavily debated topic and will be for many years to come. One
of the debated topics of capital punishment is whether it actually deters crimes effectively and is
better than life in prison with no chance at parole. Some studies had shown that the death penalty
actually saves between three and 18 lives when each convicted killer is executed.(Tanner, 2007)
Naci Mocan, an economics professor, proves the studies by re–examining data from a previous
study. Through re–examining the data, Mocat finds that "each execution results in five fewer
homicides, and commuting a death sentence means five more homicides."(Tanner, 2007) This
means that by executing the life of a convicted killer, five lives could potentially be saved. Roy
Adler and Michael Summers published a study on this subject. The authors examined U.S.
homicides and executions from 1979 to 2004, and observed that the homicides decreased while
executions increased (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). The Emory studies had also established that the
capital punishment reduces the number of murders. The first study from the Emory group had
concluded that each execution leads to eighteen fewer murders (Tanner, 2007). The second study
used monthly murder and execution data from 1977 to 1999 and concluded that each death
sentence led to 4.5 fewer murders and each execution resulted in three fewer murders (Radelet and
Lacock, 2009). Through this study, it was found that executions had the greatest effect on murders
of passion and those between friends and families, compared to murders between strangers. It was
also found that shorter stays on death row led to one fewer murder for every 2.75 fewer years that
a convict remains on death row before execution (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). The third study states
that "91% of the states had higher homicide rates after they suspended the death penalty. Conversely,
70% of the states saw homicides decrease after the death penalty was reinstated" (Radelet and
Lacock, 2009). The final study had found that "In the states that executed fewer than nine prisoners,
there was either no deterrent effect or else the homicide rate actually

Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay examples
"More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of
knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local
affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were
executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases
were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize
themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no
longer giving any excuses for killing humans. The controversial idea of whether humans are rational
enough to decide someone's life or death has been questioned. Humans absolutely don't have...show
more content...
People who commit the crime should get imprisoned for what they did for how long ever it is
given. Murderer who took away other's lives should be imprisoned for what they did for the rest
of their lives. Death penalty is absolutely not necessary because imprison itself will take away the
whole lives; they will not be allowed to have any life as human in society. We kill him, because he
killed is simply how death penalty works. Death penalty is only to take away people's life, not
reasonable punishment for their sin. Of course, people think death penalty is not just about the
punishment. People who believe in death penalty show the reason why they do is that death penalty
for sure is a deterrent to homicide. They also take this as a justification of supporting death penalty
system (2010). So people actually expect something out of this system other than just killing the
murderers simply for what they did. This is supposed to be a great solution to make better society by
lessoning the potential crime. In theory, the fact that society has a death penalty system should
somewhat scares the potential murderer and prevents them from committing murder. But the
percentage of murder crime shows the otherwise. Do potential murderers consider the death penalty
before they the murder? The answers are likely to be No. "Most deterrence research has found that

The death penalty is a cruel barbaric treatment practiced in many countries. It has influenced the
United States to use more than any other country. It has been used in the eighteenth century and is
currently being performed today in some states. There are five different methods of execution that
will lead the perpetrator to an intensifying and painful death. This treatment should be banished and
the system should find an alternate route to serve justice. According to Teh Anget's Pro Death
Arguments on Youtube, he believes there are a few valid reasons this treatment should be put into
action in our society, and the other reasons are not as significant but I disagree.
Anget says the death penalty is generally supposed to eliminate and have a removal of threats to the
public eye from the potential victims. I actually agree that death penalty can be a deterrent towards
future crime. In fact, if we penalized speeding by the death penalty, I would drastically reduce
speeding and obey the limit on the road. I certainly would not drive the way I would if I knew I
could be killed for it. Acts like that would make the perpetrator more afraid. "Most people already
have a true fear of death. If every murderer who killed someone died instantly, the homicide rate
would be very low because no one likes to die", says Bedau, H from Ornellas Paper. The death
penalty gives a sense of protection that your life is less in danger, therefore, you can live your life
according. It is the judicial system solution to curve criminal behavior and shows a way to promote
a safer country for their citizens.
Secondly, this treatment can be an effective form of closure for the victim's families to cope with
losing a loved one. "It's easy to understand why people would seek the hardest punishment in general,
and capital punishment in particular, it actually brings the relief and peace of mind the victims
deserve", said Jason Marsh from CNN. Like Anget said, Families that have been taken advantage of
from their loved one, mostly feel it is right to seek out revenge in order to feel better. Scott Vollum a
criminologist at the University of Minnesota has done media interviews with families or friends on
murder victims while the offender

Death Penalty as an Effective Method of Punishment
An issue that has continually created tension in today's society is whether the death penalty serves as
a justified and valid form of punishment. Whenever the word "death penalty" comes up, extremists
from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says deterrence, the other side says there's
a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other
side says execution is murder. Crime is an evident part of society, and everyone is aware that
something must be done about it. Most people know the threat of crime to their lives, but the
question lies in the methods and action in which it should be dealt with. In several parts of...show
more content...
To do this, the punishment for crime must be harsh enough to deter potential criminals. Under this
mindset, the death penalty makes perfect sense. Here is a punishment that truly makes a criminal
pay for his crime, stops the criminal from committing it again, and deters other criminals from
committing the same crime.
The punishment for murder is getting to be shorter and shorter. A judge could sentence a man to
life in prison. That same man could be out of jail with 15 years. How has life in jail become
known as ten to fifteen years? If the judge says life with no parole, then the criminal could stay in
jail a bit longer, but that would mean the state and it's voters would have to take care of the
prisoner for twenty to twenty five years. How can we trust the murderers and thieves of our
country to a judicial system that will either let them out in ten years or have us take care of them
for twenty years, and then let them go? The criminals do not fear the punishment anymore, because
they know they will not die. Punishment is meant to give justice to the wrongdoer and to keep him
from doing it again. I am not saying we execute all of the criminals in the world, but it has to remain
an option for the courts to use and to scare the criminals of the country. Many criminals don't fear the
judicial system. They know that they will get out in ten years if they murder someone. They

The Death Penalty has a powerful meaning to it; it's not just a punishment for those criminals who
commit a horrific crime. The Death Penalty offers the execution, gas chamber, lethal injection,
hanging, and firing squad. The capital punishment is a topic that can cause arguments because some
say it helps and some say it cannot help in anyway. The death penalty has saved lives after an
execution, but it has caused many issues for families.
The Death Penalty was established "far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King
Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes" ("History"). It
was also apart of the "Fourteen Century B.C.'s Hittite Code, in the Seventh Century B.C.'s Draconian
Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes; and in the Fifth Century
B.C.'s Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets" ("History"). The Death Penalty was carried out if it was
drowning, crucifixion, burning while being alive, impalement, and beating to death. As the time
went on by the Eighteen Century A.D. a man named William the Conqueror would not allow people
to be hung unless it was a murder case. As the years carried on in 1608 Caption George Kendall
was the first man who got executed while being record in his colony. Jane Champion was the first
woman who got executed in her colony in 1632. The Death Penalty all started and it did minimize
crimes stated in the early 1800.
Furthermore, the Death Penalty is only an execution for

Death Penalty First and foremost, the death penalty is defined as the punishment of execution,
administered to someone who has committed a terrible crime (Capital Punishment 1). This is also
known as capital punishment, which is known for disregarding the human rights. Although many
countries continue to enforce the death penalty, some countries think it should not be practiced.
According to the United States, the death penalty continues to be a charged and controversial
political and legal issue(Capital Punishment 1). In addition to, the death penalty also focuses on if
the death penalty is fair not unfair; let alone, if the criminal will receive the right justice and
punishment for the crime he has brought onto himself. The death...show more content...
Adding to the chorus of those who raise questions about fairness are those who argue that the death
penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment for those who are severely ill or mentally
impaired (Preface to "Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?" 1).
The outcome of this is to find another way to find out if the death penalty is given to the right
individual who has committed the crime. There was a research done that would allow the person
who committed the crime to take a DNA test; however, this could fairly help find a way to
persecute the victim. The way that "advance technology" is set up today "it is now possible to
establish the presence of an individual at the scene of the crime" (Preface to "Is the Death Penalty
Applied Fairly?" 1). As a result, to some disagree that the DNA testing assist the fairness and justice
of the death penalty. The death penalty is a major issue that brings up a lot of arguments in this
society. The most important question is should the death penalty be abolished or not. I think the
death penalty is the ultimate contradiction for human rights. It is cruel, barbaric, and a disgraceful
punishment that can be given to humans. According to most people "it is a affront to human
dignity" which produces an ongoing cycle of violence that can determine the human life (Capital
Punishment Should be Abolished). However, many individuals believe that no matter a

The death Penalty is a very controversial topic to many. Some believe that the death penalty should
not only be in place but there should be more executions every year. While others believe that the
death penalty is going out of style and it is not serving its purpose of deterring crime as it did
before. Although there are many claims supporting both sides still over half of Americans are for
capital punishment in some way, but what causes someone to be sentenced to death? According to
the article "Against the American System of Capital Punishment" by Jack Greenberg the worst crime
is, "a putative killer of one's parent or child" (Greenberg). What makes this the worst crime? And out
of the few executions are these the only people getting...show more content...
According to this article "How the Death Penalty Saves Lives" by David B, Muhlhausen the death
death penalty is more widely agreed upon that it should be in place than it shouldn't. The author
makes the argument that with the death penalty in place it deters the crimes that have this
punishment from happening. He also argues about how the constitution plays a role but how it
supports it. He claims that it uphold constitutional protections such as due process and equal
protection of law. Muhlhausen believes the death penalty should be in place simply because there
are more Americans for it than against it. He believes that this should be in place because it is what
America wants and the constitution supports it through the constitutional protections of due process,
and equal protection of law.Muhlhausen has many main points similar to Greenberg but
Muhlhausen doesn't have as much evidence or support to back up all of his arguments. He has
some strong points but it could be supported better. Between Jack Greenberg's, "Against the
American System of Capital Punishment" and David B. Muhlhausen, "How the Death Penalty
Saves Lives" the points they are arguing tend to be fairly similar. They both argue whether the
death penalty is a good or bad deter for the "worst crime," which is claimed to be killing that
person's parents or children. Another similar point they have

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
A man who spent nearly 25 years on death row for the kidnapping, rape and murder of a
15–year–old girl has been executed in Missouri. Roderick Nunley, 50, had admitted his guilt in
court and on Tuesday Missouri Governor Jay Nixon denied a clemency request – filed by opponents
of the death penalty – which argued that a plea DEAL had been refused because of racial bias. In
March 1989, Ann Harrison DISAPPEARED in Kansas City while waiting for a school bus on her
driveway. Nunley and Michael Taylor made a spur–of–the–moment decision to abduct her after
driving by in a stolen CAR. Ann's body was found in the boot of the abandoned car three days later.
Both men were sentenced to death in 1991. Taylor was executed last year. Chris Koster, Missouri
...show more content...
Nunley and Taylor were both black, while their victim was white. The US Supreme Court
DENIED several appeals by lawyers representing Nunley, including one which stated that the
death penalty amounted to cruel and unusual punishment. Pete Edlund, a RETIRED Kansas City
detective, told Associated Press news agency: "They just take forever to do the deed. "The delay
in executing these two is just nuts because it didn't have anything to do with their guilt. It was
legal mumbo jumbo nonsense." ACCORDINGto prosecutors, Nunley and Taylor had taken
cocaine when they stole a CAR on 22 March, 1989. At one point, a police officer had chased the
car from Lee Summit, but was called off after it crossed into Kansas City. They kidnapped Ann and
took her to Nunley's mother's home, where they raped her and then stabbed her repeatedly in the
stomach and neck. Nunley and Taylor were arrested after a man in jail for a robbery turned them in.
Some of Ann's hair was found in carpet at the home where they attacked

Every year over thousands of people die from the brutal and highest of all punishments, the capital
punishment or more known as the "Death Penalty". Countries such as China, The United States, and
even Saudi Arabia still enforces this cruel punishment. But is it really worth it? Today I will try to
convince you on why this is an inhumane punishment should cease to exist. What do you think of
the death punishment?
There were many examples which the death penalty appeared in history. For example, during the
medieval and early ages of Europe, before the appearance of modern prison systems the death
punishment was generally known as an appropriate punishment for every crime. As many as 72,000
people were executed for the reign of Henry the 8th during 21st of April 1509 to 28th of January
1547. Coming...show more content...
Over the years, the catholic church has slowly mentioned the approval of the death penalty, and
developed a disapproving stance towards it. The modern church figures, such as Pope Francis, Pope
John Paul The Second discourages these penalties, telling people to outright abolish them. There is
also Buddhism, which states that "do not kill or cause to kill". Hinduism which allows, and forbids
the death penalty. Judaism however does allows the death penalty, scholars of Judaism forbids the
death penalty penalty in the modern world. Islam although allowed, states the every person has the
right to live. As you can see, many religious although allows it. Still disagrees with it. Over the years
many abolitionists, such as " Amnesty International" with over 7 million members, which states that
the death penalty is the " ultimate, and irreversible denial of human rights". So this is the many
reasons which is why the death penalty should never exist. I hope you enjoyed my speech, and do
you agree with the death

Courtney Smith
AP Seminar
Period 3
Diana Frye
5 January 2017
Should the death penalty be legal?
Economic Rough Draft The death penalty slowly rids the world of killers – or those worthy of being
sent to death for their crime – but it takes a great deal of time and money to do so. Due to the
unnecessarily expensive capital cases, the cost efficient availability of keeping these inmates in jail
for life without parole, and the high price to execute prisoners on Death Row, the death penalty
should be illegal. Capital cases are much more expensive and time consuming than other criminal
cases. An analysis prepared by the Legislative Services Agency for the General Assembly found the
average cost for a murder case tried before a jury with the...show more content...
Web. 15 Dec. 2016. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs–death–penalty Dieter, Richard C.
"Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the
Death Penalty." Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the Death
Penalty | Death Penalty Information Center. Death Penalty Information
Center, Oct. 1922. Web. 16 Dec. 2016. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/millions
–misspent "Does the
Death Penalty Cost Less Than Life in Prison without Parole? – Death Penalty –
ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. N.p., 9 Aug. 2012. Web. 19 Dec. 2016. http:/
/deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001000 Gale. "Statistics: Death Sentences,
Capital Case Costs, And Executions." Capital Punishment:
Cruel and Unusual? Encyclopedia.com, 2008. Web. 15 Dec. 2016. http://www.encyclopedia.com
/law/legal–and–political–magazines/statistics–death–sentences–capital–case–costs–and–executions
Hennessy–Fiske, Molly. "Death Penalty: Cost of Execution Drugs –– and Executions –– Rises."
Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 24 Feb. 2012. Web. 15 Dec. 2016.

The Death Penalty In The American Justice System
Argument Essay: Death Penalty
The American Justice System has been using the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, as
a way to serve a prisoner's sentence usually due to the crime of murder. The death penalty in the
American Justice System has been used for many years now. Although in 18 states the death penalty
has already been abolished, there are still 32 states where it is still legal. The death penalty should
not be legal in the American Justice System, because it is immoral, unjust, and ineffective.
When something is immoral it usually means that it is unacceptable in our social or ethical
principles. Not only do we go against murder, but also there are some people who say this and are
for the death penalty and want the...show more content...
A capital punishment is something that cannot be undone and is irreversible.
Fig. 1. Innocent people released from death row.
In the case of Cameron Todd Willingham we are able to see how unfair and unjust Cameron was
executed for murders he did not commit. The case of Cameron had many questionable evidence that
was not investigated further and because of these mistake, Cameron Willingham was sentenced with
the death penalty and executed. The death penalty is also lacks proper justice because it denies
prisoners rehab. Many of the crimes committed were due to the influence of drugs and alcohol.
According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD), 50% of jail and
prison inmates are clinically addicted to either drugs, alcohol, or even both. This study shows that
since they are clinically addicted it could also mean that they could have been using the substance
while committing the crime. We should not be putting people on the death penalty if they were
unable to make rational decisions due to their addiction to drugs or alcohol. Mentally ill people are
also affected with the death penalty and there are cases where a person was executed and had a
mental disability. It is wrong to sentence someone to the capital punishment knowing that they were
unable to make correct decisions due to their state of health. We should be able to provide the help

Maddison Higdon
Mrs. Gallos
English 3
21 November 2017
The Death Penalty
From 1973 to mid 2017, the death penalty has been used over 1,400. This highly opinionated topic
has been intensely debated among the country's top scholars.
Justice along with closure, is a large argument that most people bring up while debating this topic.
"But the only reason Belinda Crites needs to support the death penalty is 'what Eric Nance did to my
cousin.'" (Santhanam). The argument of whether families of the victim get closure or not is entirely
based on opinions. Though most people say that it is more revenge than justice, many families
believe that with the proper execution of the criminal, it sets their mind at ease. "The verdict,
undoubtedly a...show more content...
Georgia. Gregg was charged with armed robbery and murder, he plead that his sentence to death
was cruel and unusual. The judges ruled that it was neither cruel nor unusual punishment. With
this man's death people now understood that he would no longer cause any harm to the
community or to others around him. "'Two men convicted of killing two police officers in
Hattiesburg, MS will not do any more killing. That's for sure.'"(Should the Death). Along with
many other cases the criminal's career was ended. And in the long run, made society a better
place for people to live.If a person had a problem with something bad in their life, they would
most likely eliminate it. Much like criminals, the court system made it a rule to euthanize people
whose crimes are too radical to be rehabilitated. The court cost are high in the death penalty cases,
due to the fact that they are not a common occurrence. If it was used more often, the court time
would be cut down and it would be less money. The process of euthanizing a criminal is only
around $100, though now with costs of court time it can be over a million dollars per case. Ending
a criminal's life is a permanent end to their crimes and burden on society. Overcrowded prisons are
more of a concern for the prisoners than the death penalty.
Each day more and more people are poorly cared for and are starving in our state prisons due to
overpopulation."Prison overcrowding is one of the

Argumentative Essay on Death Penalty
The death penalty is a controversial issue that many people have different opinions on. On one side
you have people like me that believe people who commit heinous crimes should be put on death
penalties. On the other side you have people, especially humanitarians, and relatives of death row
inmates protesting death row. I am pro death penalty because there are mass murderers, terrorists,
rapists, child molesters, and more that exist in today's world. In my mind, there is no place for
such evil and it should be removed accordingly. Why would someone not want the Boston bomber
put to death? He killed and injured dozens of innocent people that were simply watching a marathon
traditional to Boston. Abolitionists forget that abolishing the death penalty allows people like him to
stay alive. This capital offense punishment was started because of the bombing of the Boston
marathon by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev. The two brothers set off two
bombs four hours into the race killing three people and wounding over two hundred and sixty
people. After a two day man hunt Tamerlan was killed in a shootout with the police and Dzhokhar
was arrested and taken in to the police station. Dzhokhar went through a two part trial and ended up
getting sentenced to the death penalty. Most people, in fact a larger portion of people were happy
with this decision but as usual human right activists came up in large numbers wanting their

Hanson Yang
Professor Littlefield
English 111
23 July 2017
Death Penalty
Every society has a set of laws that are used to maintain order within the society. Crime laws are
enforced to reduce crimes. If the laws were broken, people would receive consequences that are
equal to the magnitude of the crime. Although all sanctions should equal the crime, there is a
controversial method: the death penalty. Death punishment is a cruel fate even for a criminal who
had cause great harms. The death penalty has more negative impacts than benefits. It is an
ineffective method to punish someone for a crime because of its high percentage of error and the
high costs of performing such sanction. It is also an outdated practice that many countries have
However, some were unfortunate and their innocence was proven after they were executed.
An example of an unjustifiable execution is the death of Caryl Chessman. In 1948 in Los
Angeles, there was a series of robbery and rape conducted by the "Red Light Bandit". This
criminal drove a car with a red light that was similar to the sirens on police cars. The criminal used
this light to stop drivers and rob or rape them. Chessman became a suspect because he had a car
with a similar red light. He declared his innocence but was still taken into custody. The jury found
him guilty and he was sentenced to death. On May 2, 1960, as Chessman was being strapped into the
chair in the gas chamber at San Quentin, an attorney was in Sacramento, presenting a motion to the
Judge of the California Supreme Court. The presentation is about the "real" culprit, Charles
Terranova, who fit the description provided by victims of the "Red Light Bandit." The Judge tried to
call the Warden at San Quentin to halt the execution, but his secretary misdialed the number until it
was too late: the execution had already begun. And with that, Chessman was falsely accused of a
crime he did not committed and was sentenced to an unjustifiable death.
Nevertheless to say, the time and the effort that was placed into a case like Chessman's was a total
waste. The cost of death penalty is far more than other punishments because more

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the execution of an offender that is sentenced to death
by a court of law for a criminal offense. This type of punishment for inmates is involved in
controversy over whether or not it is an acceptable form of punishment for criminals and also
whether or not it is immoral. There are many arguments for both sides of the debate, each making
valid points and pointing out the flaws of the opposing position. Many religions are either for or
against capital punishment, due to them either being against killing or for it. The controversy
surrounding the death penalty laws in the United States is made up of various arguments. Other
arguments surrounding the use of the death penalty include whether...show more content...
The constitution guarantees the due process of law and equal protection under the law. Supporters
of the death penalty also believe that it is an intolerable act of denial of civil liberties and that it is
not consistent with the values that are upheld by our democratic system. Those that support capitol
punishment claim that it has an effect on potentially violent criminals where as the threat of
imprisonment for life is not sufficient, while those against capitol punishment have shown research
that has stated that it is not more effect at deterring criminal motives then a life–long prison
sentence. The people who support capital punishment believe that it is possible to only have the
people that are truly deserving of the death are executed by having laws and procedures fashioned in
that way. They state that the capital punishment in the United States argue that the death penalty is a
very humane way of punishing those who have taken another life and are brutal killers. Those who
support it believes that it a constitutional way of punishing the criminals and deterring violent
crimes. The United States is the only English–speaking Western democracy in which the death
penalty is still in use. Capitol Punishment was reinstated by the U.S. Supreme Court after a
four–year moratorium in 1976. Religion also plays a role in the case of the death penalty. The
American

Capital punishment or death penalty is a form of punishment mostly used for people that murder
somebody. It is a very complex issue in today's world. There are very strong opinions on both
sides of the argument. Some believe that every state should have it, and others believe that none
should. It is so controversial because both sides believe that they are right and because death is so
permanent. If you make a mistake, once the death penalty is imposed, there is no taking it back.
Here are some of the views held by people about the death penalty.
Some people strongly believe that the death penalty should be imposed on, at the very least, every
murderer. Many believe that even lesser crimes warrant this punishment. They believe either that
Capital punishment deters crime by causing world be murderers to fear arrest and conviction and
by preventing convicted murderers from killing again. In recent years, violent crime in newyork
has dropped dramatically, due in part to the restitution of the death penalty.since I took office in
1995 violent crime has dropped 23 per cent,assautlts are down 22 per cent and murders have dropped
by nearly one–third. ... I believe this has occurred in part because of the strong signal that the death
and our other tough new laws have sent to violent criminals and murderers. You will be punished
with the full force of the law.
No:capital punishment actually makes the fight against crime more difficult. Executions waste
valuable resources that could be applied to more promising efforts to protect the public. Additionally
, innocent people are sometimes executed and the brutalizing effect executions have on society may
result in more murders. In 1994, 6100 criminals were sentenced to the state prison in manhattan
(New York) and 9000 more were sent to city jail. In 1975, when I became district attorney, there were
648 homicides inmanhattan; in 1994, there were 330. The number has been cut vitually in half
without executions_ proof to me that they are not needed to continue that trend. ( George E.Pataki
,1995

My initial thoughts on the death penalty were that no matter how much the death penalty deters
crime, it is still a cruel punishment. I always assumed that the death penalty violated our eighth
amendment, so why in this day and age is it still deemed as a penalty for a crime? It is widely
known that the use of the death penalty is an extremely serious and permanent punishment.
However, the government had already found its way to justify it by creating the fifth amendment
which allows someone to be executed as long as there is due process of law. The bill of rights was
written centuries ago in a time when execution was deemed necessary for a majority of crimes.
The death penalty, also commonly referred to as capital punishment, can be sentenced to anyone that
has been convicted of murder or a capital crime. In the eighteenth century, more than two hundred
crimes were deemed punishable by death because everyone had this idea of retribution but to the
worst extent. Currently there are nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty in the United
States; while execution still remains an option for thirty–one states. In the United States, it is
acknowledged that the system is flawed and sometimes unjust resulting in many states abolishing the
death penalty. Why do the remaining states want to keep the punishment around?
Before I completely sided with one viewpoint of this argument I wanted to do some research. After
searching for articles on Opposing Viewpoints that

Is The Death Penalty Effective Argumentative Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Más de Paper Writing Service Cheap

Más de Paper Writing Service Cheap (20)

Último

Último (20)

Is The Death Penalty Effective Argumentative Essay