SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 8
Descargar para leer sin conexión
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re:                                                    Chapter 11

ALLIED SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.,                            Case No. 12-11564 (CSS)

                         Alleged Debtor.                 Re: Docket No. 29



In re:                                                    Chapter 11

ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.),                              Case No. 12-11565 (CSS)

                         Alleged Debtor.                  Re: Docket No. 29

                                                          Hearing Date: TBD
                                                          Objection Deadline: TBD

         ALLEGED DEBTORS’ MOTION TO FILE UNREDACTED VERSION OF THE
          MOTION OF ALLEGED DEBTORS TO TRANSFER VENUE OF THIS CASE
          TO THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
              DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION UNDER SEAL

                   The above-captioned alleged debtors (collectively, the “Alleged Debtors”) hereby

 submit this motion (the “Motion to Seal”) for entry of an order pursuant to section 107(b)(1) of

 title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1533 (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 9018

 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) and Rule 9108-1(b) of

 the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for

 the District of Delaware (the ”Local Rules”) protecting the Alleged Debtors’ interest in sensitive

 commercial information contained in the Motion of Alleged Debtors to Transfer Venue of this

 Case to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta

 Division [Docket No. 29 in Case No. 12-11564 (CSS) and Docket No. 29 in Case No. 12-11565

 (CSS)] (the “Motion to Transfer Venue”), dated May 21, 2012, and publically filed

 contemporaneously herewith in a redacted form. In support of the Motion to Seal, the Alleged

 Debtors respectfully state as follows:



 RLF1 6046753v.1
Background

                  1.     On May 17, 2012 (the “Petition Date”), BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP,

Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Adviser, L.L.C, and Spectrum Investment Partners LP

(collectively, the “Petitioning Creditors”) filed involuntary chapter 11 petitions against the

Alleged Debtors. The circumstances and the Petitioning Creditors motives leading to the filing

of these petitions are set forth in detail in the Motion to Transfer Venue and are fully

incorporated as if set forth herein.1

                                   Legal Basis for Relief Requested

                  2.     By this Motion to Seal, the Alleged Debtors request that the Court enter an

order authorizing and directing that an unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue be

filed under seal and not made available to any party other than the Office of the United States

Trustee for the District of Delaware and the Petitioning Creditors (collectively, the “Receiving

Parties”) on a confidential basis.2

                                              Basis for Relief

                  3.     Section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides, in relevant part, as

follows:

                         On request of a party in interest, the bankruptcy court shall . . .

                         (1)     protect an entity with respect to a trade secret or
                                 confidential research, development, or commercial
                                 information . . . .

                  4.     Bankruptcy Rule 9018 defines the procedures by which a party may move

for relief under section 107(b), providing that “[o]n motion or on its own initiative, with or

1   Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion to
    Transfer Venue.

2   An undredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue will also be provided to the Court for its review in
    accordance with Local Rule 9018-1(b).

RLF1 6046753v.1
                                                      2
without notice, the court may make any order which justice requires (1) to protect the estate or

any entity in respect of a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial

information [or] (2) to protect any entity against scandalous or defamatory matter contained in

any paper filed in a case under the Code . . . .” Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9018. Confidential information

need not rise to the level of a trade secret to merit protection under section 107(b). See Video

Software Dealers Assoc. v. Orion Pictures Corp. (In re Orion Pictures Corp.), 21 F.3d 24, 27 (2d

Cir. 1994) (commercial information defined as “information which would cause an unfair

advantage to competitors by providing them information as to the commercial operations of the

debtor”).

                  5.   Once a court determines that the information in question falls within one

of the categories enumerated in section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, “the court is required to

protect a requesting interested party and has no discretion to deny the application.” Id. The

Court has broad authority to issue such an order under Bankruptcy Rule 9018. See In re Global

Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. 720, 724 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (“When the requirements of Rule 9018

are satisfied, the authority to issue the resulting order is broad – ‘any order which justice

requires.’ The Court notes that the authority goes not just to the protection of confidential

documents, but to other confidentiality restrictions that are warranted in the interests of justice.”).

                  6.   In addition, under section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Court may

“issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the

provisions” of the Bankruptcy Code.

                  7.   The Alleged Debtors submit that the unredacted version of the Motion to

Transfer Venue contains sensitive information of a commercial nature and should not be subject

to disclosure to the general public.      Specifically, the unredacted version of the Motion to


RLF1 6046753v.1
                                                  3
Transfer Venue contains confidential information regarding the Alleged Debtors’ financial

condition and their pursuit of certain restructuring options that, if disclosed, could threaten on-

going negotiations and harm the Alleged Debtors’ business operations.          Thus, the Alleged

Debtors believe that the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue should be filed

under seal, not be made public, and be available only to Receiving Parties and the Court on a

confidential basis.

                  8.    Further, as stated above, the Alleged Debtors have publically filed a

redacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue contemporaneously with this Motion to Seal.

Only the sensitive commercial information contained therein has been redacted. Accordingly,

the Alleged Debtors submit that the redacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue contains

sufficient information -- even without the specific information contained in the unredacted

version of the Motion to Transfer Venue -- to permit other interested parties, if any, a full and

fair opportunity to consider the merits of the Motion to Transfer Venue and to formulate and file

objections thereto.

                  9.    Accordingly, the Alleged Debtors respectfully submit that the filing of the

unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue under seal is necessary and appropriate in

these circumstances.

                                              Notice

                  10.   Notice of this Motion to Seal shall be provided to: (i) the Office of the

United States Trustee for the District of Delaware; and (ii) the Petitioning Creditors. The

Alleged Debtors respectfully submit that no further notice of this Motion is required.




RLF1 6046753v.1
                                                 4
WHEREFORE, the Alleged Debtors respectfully request that, pursuant to 11

U.S.C. § 107(b)(1), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9018 and Del. Bankr. L.R. 9018-1(b), the Court enter an

order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, (i) authorizing the Alleged Debtors

to file an unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue under seal; (ii) directing the

Receiving Parties to maintain the strict confidentiality of the unredacted version of the Motion to

Transfer Venue; and (iii) granting the Alleged Debtors such other and further relief as is just and

proper.



Dated: May 21, 2012
       Wilmington, Delaware                  RespectfulLy submitted,



                                             Mark D. C lins (No. 98 )
                                             Christop er M. Samis (No. 4909)
                                             RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
                                             One Rodney Square
                                             920 North King Street
                                             Wilmington, Delaware 19801
                                             Telephone: (302) 651-7700
                                             Facsimile: (302) 651-7701
                                             E-mail: collins@rlf.com
                                             E-mail: samis@rlf.com

                                             -and-

                                             Jeffrey W. Kelley (GA Bar No. 412296)
                                             Ezra H. Cohen (GA Bar No. 173800)
                                             TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
                                             Bank of America Plaza
                                             600 Peachtree Street, Suite 5200
                                             Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2216
                                             Telephone No.: (404) 885-3000
                                             Facsimile No.:     (404) 885-3900
                                             E-Mail: jeffrey .kelley@troutmansanders.com
                                             E-Mail: ezra.cohen@troutmansanders.com

                                             Counsel for Alleged Debtors


RLF1 6046753v. 1
                                                 5
Exhibit A




RLF1 6046753v.1
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re:                                                           Chapter 11

ALLIED SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.,                                   Case No. 12-11564 (CSS)

                          Alleged Debtor.                        Re: Docket Nos. ___ and ___



In re:                                                           Chapter 11

ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.),                                     Case No. 12-11565 (CSS)

                          Alleged Debtor.                        Re: Docket Nos. ___ and ___


     ORDER GRANTING ALLEGED DEBTORS’ MOTION TO FILE AN UNREDACTED
     VERSION OF THE MOTION OF ALLEGED DEBTORS TO TRANSFER VENUE OF
        THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE
       NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION UNDER SEAL

                   The Court having considered the Alleged Debtors’ Motion to File an Unredacted

 Version of the Motion of Alleged Debtors to Transfer Venue of this Case to the United States

 Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division Under Seal [Docket No.

 ___ in Case No. 12-11564 (CSS) and Docket No. ___ in Case No. 12-11565 (CSS)] (the

 “Motion to Seal”); 1 the Court having reviewed the Motion to Seal and having heard the

 statements of counsel regarding the relief requested in the Motion to Seal at a hearing before the

 Court (the ”Hearing”); the Court having found that (i) the Court has jurisdiction over this matter

 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, (ii) this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

 § 157(b)(2), and (iii) notice of the Motion to Seal and the Hearing was sufficient under the

 circumstances; and the Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set forth in the

 Motion to Seal and at the Hearing establish just cause for the relief granted herein;


 1        Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion to
      Seal.



 RLF1 6046753v.1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

                  1.   The Motion to Seal is granted.

                  2.   The Alleged Debtors may file the undredacted version of the Motion to

Transfer Venue under seal.

                  3.   The Clerk of the Court shall segregate and maintain the unredacted

version of the Motion to Transfer Venue under seal pursuant to the procedures set forth in Local

Rule 9018-1(b) until further order of this Court.

                  4.   The foregoing notwithstanding, access to the unredacted version of the

Motion to Transfer Venue shall be provided only to the Receiving Parties, each of which shall

maintain the confidentiality of the undredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue and its

contents.

                  5.   The Alleged Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to

effectuate the relief granted pursuant to this Order in accordance with the Motion to Seal,

including, without limitation, requiring any party requesting additional information about the

unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue to submit to confidentiality agreements with

the Alleged Debtors, who, in their sole discretion, shall determine whether to provide such

additional information.

                  6.   This Court retains jurisdiction to interpret and enforce this Order.



Dated: May _____, 2012                       __________________________________________
       Wilmington, Delaware                  THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER S. SONTCHI
                                             UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE




RLF1 6046753v.1
                                                    2

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Report & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFL
Report & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFLReport & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFL
Report & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFLPollard PLLC
 
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650James Glucksman
 
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....Karol Pessin
 
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...malp2009
 
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...Angela Kaaihue
 
Edward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - Lawsuit
Edward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - LawsuitEdward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - Lawsuit
Edward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - LawsuitUmesh Heendeniya
 
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awayDoc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awaymalp2009
 
Katz compl co118140704805
Katz compl co118140704805Katz compl co118140704805
Katz compl co118140704805Hudson TV
 
Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...
Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...
Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...This Is Reno
 
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance company
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance companyFisker's lawsuit against insurance company
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance companykatiefehren
 
B178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarke
B178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarkeB178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarke
B178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarkejamesmaredmond
 
Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...
Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...
Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...This Is Reno
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)Daniel Alouidor
 
Motion to amend judgment points & authorities- signed
Motion to amend judgment  points & authorities- signedMotion to amend judgment  points & authorities- signed
Motion to amend judgment points & authorities- signedjamesmaredmond
 
Darren Chaker TRO Sex offender
Darren Chaker TRO Sex offenderDarren Chaker TRO Sex offender
Darren Chaker TRO Sex offenderDarren Chaker
 
citimortgage robo signers
citimortgage robo signerscitimortgage robo signers
citimortgage robo signerstsimmonsia
 
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...William J. Amann
 

La actualidad más candente (19)

10000000028
1000000002810000000028
10000000028
 
Report & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFL
Report & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFLReport & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFL
Report & Recommendation Denying Preliminary Injunction - MDFL
 
Cox opp to mot dismiss
Cox opp to mot dismissCox opp to mot dismiss
Cox opp to mot dismiss
 
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
 
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
 
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
 
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
 
Edward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - Lawsuit
Edward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - LawsuitEdward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - Lawsuit
Edward O'Donnell vs. Countrywide and Bank of America - Lawsuit
 
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awayDoc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
 
Katz compl co118140704805
Katz compl co118140704805Katz compl co118140704805
Katz compl co118140704805
 
Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...
Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...
Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...
 
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance company
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance companyFisker's lawsuit against insurance company
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance company
 
B178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarke
B178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarkeB178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarke
B178942 sulphur v knapp petersen clarke
 
Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...
Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...
Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
 
Motion to amend judgment points & authorities- signed
Motion to amend judgment  points & authorities- signedMotion to amend judgment  points & authorities- signed
Motion to amend judgment points & authorities- signed
 
Darren Chaker TRO Sex offender
Darren Chaker TRO Sex offenderDarren Chaker TRO Sex offender
Darren Chaker TRO Sex offender
 
citimortgage robo signers
citimortgage robo signerscitimortgage robo signers
citimortgage robo signers
 
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...
 

Destacado

Kodak equity committee opinion
Kodak equity committee opinionKodak equity committee opinion
Kodak equity committee opinionRandall Reese
 
Morris brown plan support agreement
Morris brown plan support agreementMorris brown plan support agreement
Morris brown plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
DesignLine Corporation Petition
DesignLine Corporation PetitionDesignLine Corporation Petition
DesignLine Corporation PetitionRandall Reese
 
Revstone sale transaction support agreement summary
Revstone sale transaction support agreement summaryRevstone sale transaction support agreement summary
Revstone sale transaction support agreement summaryRandall Reese
 
Handy hardware revised psa blackline
Handy hardware revised psa blacklineHandy hardware revised psa blackline
Handy hardware revised psa blacklineRandall Reese
 
Evergreen oil plan support agreement
Evergreen oil plan support agreementEvergreen oil plan support agreement
Evergreen oil plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Patriot coal backstop purchase agreement
Patriot coal backstop purchase agreementPatriot coal backstop purchase agreement
Patriot coal backstop purchase agreementRandall Reese
 
Edison mission plan sponsor agreement
Edison mission plan sponsor agreementEdison mission plan sponsor agreement
Edison mission plan sponsor agreementRandall Reese
 
Devonshire pga plan support agreement
Devonshire pga plan support agreementDevonshire pga plan support agreement
Devonshire pga plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Friend finder transaction support agreement
Friend finder transaction support agreementFriend finder transaction support agreement
Friend finder transaction support agreementRandall Reese
 

Destacado (18)

Kodak equity committee opinion
Kodak equity committee opinionKodak equity committee opinion
Kodak equity committee opinion
 
F0059 105
F0059 105F0059 105
F0059 105
 
10000000016
1000000001610000000016
10000000016
 
10000000015
1000000001510000000015
10000000015
 
10000000033
1000000003310000000033
10000000033
 
Morris brown plan support agreement
Morris brown plan support agreementMorris brown plan support agreement
Morris brown plan support agreement
 
DesignLine Corporation Petition
DesignLine Corporation PetitionDesignLine Corporation Petition
DesignLine Corporation Petition
 
Revstone sale transaction support agreement summary
Revstone sale transaction support agreement summaryRevstone sale transaction support agreement summary
Revstone sale transaction support agreement summary
 
10000000038
1000000003810000000038
10000000038
 
10000000012
1000000001210000000012
10000000012
 
Handy hardware revised psa blackline
Handy hardware revised psa blacklineHandy hardware revised psa blackline
Handy hardware revised psa blackline
 
Evergreen oil plan support agreement
Evergreen oil plan support agreementEvergreen oil plan support agreement
Evergreen oil plan support agreement
 
Patriot coal backstop purchase agreement
Patriot coal backstop purchase agreementPatriot coal backstop purchase agreement
Patriot coal backstop purchase agreement
 
10000000049
1000000004910000000049
10000000049
 
10000000051
1000000005110000000051
10000000051
 
Edison mission plan sponsor agreement
Edison mission plan sponsor agreementEdison mission plan sponsor agreement
Edison mission plan sponsor agreement
 
Devonshire pga plan support agreement
Devonshire pga plan support agreementDevonshire pga plan support agreement
Devonshire pga plan support agreement
 
Friend finder transaction support agreement
Friend finder transaction support agreementFriend finder transaction support agreement
Friend finder transaction support agreement
 

Similar a 10000000032

2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docx
2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docx2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docx
2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docxeugeniadean34240
 
Steele Remand Order 11th Circuit
Steele Remand Order 11th CircuitSteele Remand Order 11th Circuit
Steele Remand Order 11th Circuitmzamoralaw
 
Motion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright Lawsuit
Motion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright LawsuitMotion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright Lawsuit
Motion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright Lawsuitrkcenters
 
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counselHindenburg Research
 
Disqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 Plans
Disqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 PlansDisqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 Plans
Disqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 PlansDavid S. Kupetz
 
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtorDoc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtormalp2009
 

Similar a 10000000032 (20)

10000001240
1000000124010000001240
10000001240
 
10000001237
1000000123710000001237
10000001237
 
2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docx
2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docx2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docx
2 of 2 DOCUMENTSJ. TAIKWOK YUNG WEBADVISO, Plaintiff-Appel.docx
 
10000000042
1000000004210000000042
10000000042
 
10000001202
1000000120210000001202
10000001202
 
10000001244
1000000124410000001244
10000001244
 
10000001241
1000000124110000001241
10000001241
 
10000001203
1000000120310000001203
10000001203
 
10000001206
1000000120610000001206
10000001206
 
Steele Remand Order 11th Circuit
Steele Remand Order 11th CircuitSteele Remand Order 11th Circuit
Steele Remand Order 11th Circuit
 
10000001209
1000000120910000001209
10000001209
 
10000001212
1000000121210000001212
10000001212
 
10000001204
1000000120410000001204
10000001204
 
10000001201
1000000120110000001201
10000001201
 
Motion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright Lawsuit
Motion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright LawsuitMotion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright Lawsuit
Motion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright Lawsuit
 
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
 
Disqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 Plans
Disqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 PlansDisqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 Plans
Disqualifying Votes on Chapter 11 Plans
 
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtorDoc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
 
2365026_1
2365026_12365026_1
2365026_1
 
Doc. 131
Doc. 131Doc. 131
Doc. 131
 

Más de Randall Reese

South franklin plan support agreement
South franklin plan support agreementSouth franklin plan support agreement
South franklin plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1Randall Reese
 
Newland intl plan support agreement
Newland intl plan support agreementNewland intl plan support agreement
Newland intl plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Kit digital plan support agreement
Kit digital plan support agreementKit digital plan support agreement
Kit digital plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Handy hardware revised psa clean
Handy hardware revised psa cleanHandy hardware revised psa clean
Handy hardware revised psa cleanRandall Reese
 
Handy hardward plan support agreement
Handy hardward plan support agreementHandy hardward plan support agreement
Handy hardward plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Gmx resources psa amendment
Gmx resources psa amendmentGmx resources psa amendment
Gmx resources psa amendmentRandall Reese
 
Gmx resources plan support agreement
Gmx resources plan support agreementGmx resources plan support agreement
Gmx resources plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Gabriel tech plan support agreement
Gabriel tech plan support agreementGabriel tech plan support agreement
Gabriel tech plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Ferraiolo plan support agreement
Ferraiolo plan support agreementFerraiolo plan support agreement
Ferraiolo plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Excel maritime plan support agreement
Excel maritime plan support agreementExcel maritime plan support agreement
Excel maritime plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Coda holdings plan support agreement
Coda holdings plan support agreementCoda holdings plan support agreement
Coda holdings plan support agreementRandall Reese
 
Cengage restructuring support agreement
Cengage restructuring support agreementCengage restructuring support agreement
Cengage restructuring support agreementRandall Reese
 
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2Randall Reese
 

Más de Randall Reese (17)

South franklin plan support agreement
South franklin plan support agreementSouth franklin plan support agreement
South franklin plan support agreement
 
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1
 
Newland intl plan support agreement
Newland intl plan support agreementNewland intl plan support agreement
Newland intl plan support agreement
 
Kit digital plan support agreement
Kit digital plan support agreementKit digital plan support agreement
Kit digital plan support agreement
 
Handy hardware revised psa clean
Handy hardware revised psa cleanHandy hardware revised psa clean
Handy hardware revised psa clean
 
Handy hardward plan support agreement
Handy hardward plan support agreementHandy hardward plan support agreement
Handy hardward plan support agreement
 
Gmx resources psa amendment
Gmx resources psa amendmentGmx resources psa amendment
Gmx resources psa amendment
 
Gmx resources plan support agreement
Gmx resources plan support agreementGmx resources plan support agreement
Gmx resources plan support agreement
 
Gabriel tech plan support agreement
Gabriel tech plan support agreementGabriel tech plan support agreement
Gabriel tech plan support agreement
 
Ferraiolo plan support agreement
Ferraiolo plan support agreementFerraiolo plan support agreement
Ferraiolo plan support agreement
 
Excel maritime plan support agreement
Excel maritime plan support agreementExcel maritime plan support agreement
Excel maritime plan support agreement
 
Coda holdings plan support agreement
Coda holdings plan support agreementCoda holdings plan support agreement
Coda holdings plan support agreement
 
Cengage restructuring support agreement
Cengage restructuring support agreementCengage restructuring support agreement
Cengage restructuring support agreement
 
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2
 
10000000048
1000000004810000000048
10000000048
 
10000000047
1000000004710000000047
10000000047
 
10000000046
1000000004610000000046
10000000046
 

10000000032

  • 1. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 ALLIED SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 12-11564 (CSS) Alleged Debtor. Re: Docket No. 29 In re: Chapter 11 ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.), Case No. 12-11565 (CSS) Alleged Debtor. Re: Docket No. 29 Hearing Date: TBD Objection Deadline: TBD ALLEGED DEBTORS’ MOTION TO FILE UNREDACTED VERSION OF THE MOTION OF ALLEGED DEBTORS TO TRANSFER VENUE OF THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION UNDER SEAL The above-captioned alleged debtors (collectively, the “Alleged Debtors”) hereby submit this motion (the “Motion to Seal”) for entry of an order pursuant to section 107(b)(1) of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1533 (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 9018 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) and Rule 9108-1(b) of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the ”Local Rules”) protecting the Alleged Debtors’ interest in sensitive commercial information contained in the Motion of Alleged Debtors to Transfer Venue of this Case to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division [Docket No. 29 in Case No. 12-11564 (CSS) and Docket No. 29 in Case No. 12-11565 (CSS)] (the “Motion to Transfer Venue”), dated May 21, 2012, and publically filed contemporaneously herewith in a redacted form. In support of the Motion to Seal, the Alleged Debtors respectfully state as follows: RLF1 6046753v.1
  • 2. Background 1. On May 17, 2012 (the “Petition Date”), BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP, Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Adviser, L.L.C, and Spectrum Investment Partners LP (collectively, the “Petitioning Creditors”) filed involuntary chapter 11 petitions against the Alleged Debtors. The circumstances and the Petitioning Creditors motives leading to the filing of these petitions are set forth in detail in the Motion to Transfer Venue and are fully incorporated as if set forth herein.1 Legal Basis for Relief Requested 2. By this Motion to Seal, the Alleged Debtors request that the Court enter an order authorizing and directing that an unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue be filed under seal and not made available to any party other than the Office of the United States Trustee for the District of Delaware and the Petitioning Creditors (collectively, the “Receiving Parties”) on a confidential basis.2 Basis for Relief 3. Section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides, in relevant part, as follows: On request of a party in interest, the bankruptcy court shall . . . (1) protect an entity with respect to a trade secret or confidential research, development, or commercial information . . . . 4. Bankruptcy Rule 9018 defines the procedures by which a party may move for relief under section 107(b), providing that “[o]n motion or on its own initiative, with or 1 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion to Transfer Venue. 2 An undredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue will also be provided to the Court for its review in accordance with Local Rule 9018-1(b). RLF1 6046753v.1 2
  • 3. without notice, the court may make any order which justice requires (1) to protect the estate or any entity in respect of a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information [or] (2) to protect any entity against scandalous or defamatory matter contained in any paper filed in a case under the Code . . . .” Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9018. Confidential information need not rise to the level of a trade secret to merit protection under section 107(b). See Video Software Dealers Assoc. v. Orion Pictures Corp. (In re Orion Pictures Corp.), 21 F.3d 24, 27 (2d Cir. 1994) (commercial information defined as “information which would cause an unfair advantage to competitors by providing them information as to the commercial operations of the debtor”). 5. Once a court determines that the information in question falls within one of the categories enumerated in section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, “the court is required to protect a requesting interested party and has no discretion to deny the application.” Id. The Court has broad authority to issue such an order under Bankruptcy Rule 9018. See In re Global Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. 720, 724 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (“When the requirements of Rule 9018 are satisfied, the authority to issue the resulting order is broad – ‘any order which justice requires.’ The Court notes that the authority goes not just to the protection of confidential documents, but to other confidentiality restrictions that are warranted in the interests of justice.”). 6. In addition, under section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Court may “issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions” of the Bankruptcy Code. 7. The Alleged Debtors submit that the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue contains sensitive information of a commercial nature and should not be subject to disclosure to the general public. Specifically, the unredacted version of the Motion to RLF1 6046753v.1 3
  • 4. Transfer Venue contains confidential information regarding the Alleged Debtors’ financial condition and their pursuit of certain restructuring options that, if disclosed, could threaten on- going negotiations and harm the Alleged Debtors’ business operations. Thus, the Alleged Debtors believe that the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue should be filed under seal, not be made public, and be available only to Receiving Parties and the Court on a confidential basis. 8. Further, as stated above, the Alleged Debtors have publically filed a redacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue contemporaneously with this Motion to Seal. Only the sensitive commercial information contained therein has been redacted. Accordingly, the Alleged Debtors submit that the redacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue contains sufficient information -- even without the specific information contained in the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue -- to permit other interested parties, if any, a full and fair opportunity to consider the merits of the Motion to Transfer Venue and to formulate and file objections thereto. 9. Accordingly, the Alleged Debtors respectfully submit that the filing of the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue under seal is necessary and appropriate in these circumstances. Notice 10. Notice of this Motion to Seal shall be provided to: (i) the Office of the United States Trustee for the District of Delaware; and (ii) the Petitioning Creditors. The Alleged Debtors respectfully submit that no further notice of this Motion is required. RLF1 6046753v.1 4
  • 5. WHEREFORE, the Alleged Debtors respectfully request that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 107(b)(1), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9018 and Del. Bankr. L.R. 9018-1(b), the Court enter an order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, (i) authorizing the Alleged Debtors to file an unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue under seal; (ii) directing the Receiving Parties to maintain the strict confidentiality of the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue; and (iii) granting the Alleged Debtors such other and further relief as is just and proper. Dated: May 21, 2012 Wilmington, Delaware RespectfulLy submitted, Mark D. C lins (No. 98 ) Christop er M. Samis (No. 4909) RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: (302) 651-7700 Facsimile: (302) 651-7701 E-mail: collins@rlf.com E-mail: samis@rlf.com -and- Jeffrey W. Kelley (GA Bar No. 412296) Ezra H. Cohen (GA Bar No. 173800) TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP Bank of America Plaza 600 Peachtree Street, Suite 5200 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2216 Telephone No.: (404) 885-3000 Facsimile No.: (404) 885-3900 E-Mail: jeffrey .kelley@troutmansanders.com E-Mail: ezra.cohen@troutmansanders.com Counsel for Alleged Debtors RLF1 6046753v. 1 5
  • 7. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 ALLIED SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 12-11564 (CSS) Alleged Debtor. Re: Docket Nos. ___ and ___ In re: Chapter 11 ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.), Case No. 12-11565 (CSS) Alleged Debtor. Re: Docket Nos. ___ and ___ ORDER GRANTING ALLEGED DEBTORS’ MOTION TO FILE AN UNREDACTED VERSION OF THE MOTION OF ALLEGED DEBTORS TO TRANSFER VENUE OF THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION UNDER SEAL The Court having considered the Alleged Debtors’ Motion to File an Unredacted Version of the Motion of Alleged Debtors to Transfer Venue of this Case to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division Under Seal [Docket No. ___ in Case No. 12-11564 (CSS) and Docket No. ___ in Case No. 12-11565 (CSS)] (the “Motion to Seal”); 1 the Court having reviewed the Motion to Seal and having heard the statements of counsel regarding the relief requested in the Motion to Seal at a hearing before the Court (the ”Hearing”); the Court having found that (i) the Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, (ii) this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and (iii) notice of the Motion to Seal and the Hearing was sufficient under the circumstances; and the Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion to Seal and at the Hearing establish just cause for the relief granted herein; 1 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion to Seal. RLF1 6046753v.1
  • 8. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion to Seal is granted. 2. The Alleged Debtors may file the undredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue under seal. 3. The Clerk of the Court shall segregate and maintain the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue under seal pursuant to the procedures set forth in Local Rule 9018-1(b) until further order of this Court. 4. The foregoing notwithstanding, access to the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue shall be provided only to the Receiving Parties, each of which shall maintain the confidentiality of the undredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue and its contents. 5. The Alleged Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief granted pursuant to this Order in accordance with the Motion to Seal, including, without limitation, requiring any party requesting additional information about the unredacted version of the Motion to Transfer Venue to submit to confidentiality agreements with the Alleged Debtors, who, in their sole discretion, shall determine whether to provide such additional information. 6. This Court retains jurisdiction to interpret and enforce this Order. Dated: May _____, 2012 __________________________________________ Wilmington, Delaware THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER S. SONTCHI UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE RLF1 6046753v.1 2