2. Key Takeaways for Today
Introduction to the National Center for Rural Road Safety
Importance of Rural Road Safety
Compare a traditional safety approach and the Safe System
Approach
Identify the importance of safety culture in applying the Safe
System Approach
View the 5 Safe System elements from a rural perspective
List examples and resources being used in rural areas
August 13,
2022
| 2
3. National Center for Rural Road Safety
FHWA Center of Excellence
Established in Dec. 2014
Next Generation Center
New operations started Feb. 1, 2022
Updated management team
(Some) new partners
August 13,
2022
| 3
4. What We Do
All rural road safety, all the time
Focus on local practitioners
Rural road safety resources and tech assistance
Multi-disciplinary training
National connections
August 13,
2022
| 4
6. Rural Road Safety Awareness Week 2022
What’s Unique About Rural Road Safety?
The Safe System Approach for Rural Roads
Proven Safety Countermeasures for Rural Roads
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for Rural Road
Safety
The Intersection of Rural Road Safety and
Public Health
August 13,
2022
| 6
Download graphics here:
https://ruralsafetycenter.org/rural-
road-safety-awareness-week-2022/
8. Defining Rural
Local = Describes the
jurisdiction that
owns/manages the roads
Rural = Describes the location
and context of the road and
community
August 13,
2022
| 8
Data Source: Public Road Length Excel Sheet with 2014 Data provided by NY LTAP. Photo Source: Neil Hetherington, WTI
9. Aren’t all Rural Communities the Same?
Graphic Source: NCHRP 20-122
Exurban
Tourism-based
Resource-based
Older-age
Beyond the “lower 48”
Tribal lands & Alaska native
Frontier/remote
August 13,
2022
| 9
10. Rural/Urban Comparison
Data Source: FARS 2018 Annual Report File (ARF); 2010 Census; FHWA Office of Highway Policy Information, Highway Statistics 2018 , ROUTES
August 13,
2022
| 10
11. The Rural Story
Crash Types
Single vehicle rollovers
Rural roadway departure
Head-on crashes
Human Behaviors
Speed
Posted speed limit
Unrestrained
August 13,
2022
| 11
Photo Source: Neil Hetherington, WTI and Jaime Sullivan, WTI
15. Rural Behaviors and Culture
Different risk perception
Belief that enforcement is less likely
Need rural specific safety campaigns
Helping neighbors
Social ties to community can hinder enforcement
efforts
Resistance to top-down initiatives
August 13,
2022
| 15
16. Unique Challenges of Rural Road Safety
Resources and funding
Data
Communication and power infrastructure
Geographical jurisdictions
Post-crash care
August 13,
2022
| 16
17. Post it Note Exercise
What’s Unique About Rural Road Safety?
In this unique road setting, how can rural
roads become safe for all road users?
August 13,
2022
| 17
19. Safe System Approach
August 13,
2022
| 19
Graphic Source: FHWA
Different way to think about road
safety problem
Holistic approach
Aims to eliminate fatal and
serious injuries for all road users
Accommodates human mistakes
Keeps impacts on the human
body at tolerable levels
20. Traditional approach Safe System approach
Reduce crashes Eliminate fatalities and serious injuries
Improve human behavior Design for human mistakes/limitations
Speed management Kinetic Energy Management
Individuals are responsible Share responsibility
Apply countermeasures at
high crash locations
Proactively apply countermeasures in
a “systemic” approach
20
Paradigm Shift
August 13,
2022
| 20
Efficient Mobility Safe Mobility
22. The 6 Safe System Principles
Death/serious injury is
unacceptable
Humans make
mistakes
Humans are
vulnerable
Responsibility is
shared
Safety is proactive Redundancy
is crucial
22
August 13,
2022
| 22
23. Impact of Safety
42,915 estimated
roadway
fatalities in
~118 roadway
fatalities/day
~7 roadway
fatalities during
this workshop
Data Source: NHTSA 2022
August 13,
2022
| 23
24. What is the right number?
There’s No One SomeoneWon’t Miss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k
2tOye9DKdQ
August 13,
2022
24
Source: Transport Accident Commission Victoria
| 24
25. Discussion Question
If you had the opportunity to implement a feature
that would reduce the number of fatalities and
serious injuries by 50%,but would double the total
number of minor crashes …
would you do it…yes or no?
August 13,
2022
| 25
26. Applying Human Factors
The system owners and
operators should strive to make
it easy for humans to not make
mistakes by designing roads
and vehicles to be in tune with
human competencies.
August 13,
2022
| 26
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/docs/fhwasa20071.pdf
http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/167909.aspx
27. Aren’t All Drivers the Same?
Competence + Human FactorsVariables =
Capability
Competence
Innate abilities born with
Life Experiences
Human FactorsVariables
Attitudes
Behaviors
August 13,
2022
| 27
Photo Source: FHWA
28. Traffic Safety Culture
The shared beliefs (including
values, assumptions, etc.) of a
group which affect behaviors
related to safety
A belief system is based on
thoughts which are not
observable
To change behaviors, we must
change beliefs
August 13,
2022
| 28
Graphic Source: CHSC
29. Discussion Question
Why are people killed and
seriously injured on the roads?
People are killed and seriously injured on the roads
when the collision forces transferred onto the human
body exceed tolerable thresholds.
August 13,
2022
| 29
30. Humans are Vulnerable
The human body has a limited physical ability to
tolerate crash forces before harm occurs.
Under the Safe System approach, the roadway
operating conditions are managed to prevent
those large forces.
Designing safer roads is an exercise of managing
kinetic energy.
August 13,
2022
| 30
31. Kinetic Energy =
1
2
𝑚𝑣2
Source: FHWA
Graphic Source: FHWA
August 13,
2022
| 31
Velocity is aVector
- Speed
- Direction (angle of impact)
33. Creating a More Forgiving Road System
System Managers
Vehicle Manufacturers
Law Enforcement
Post-Crash Care
System Users
August 13,
2022
| 33
Graphic Source: FHWA
35. Linking Safety Culture to SSA
Safe System Principles
1. Death & serious injury is
unacceptable
2. Humans make mistakes
3. Humans are vulnerable
4. Responsibility is shared
5. Safety is proactive
6. Redundancy is crucial
Graphic Source: ARA and FHWA
Organizational Safety
Culture
the shared beliefs
(including values,
assumptions, etc.) of an
organization which affect
behaviors related to safety.
August 13,
2022
| 35
36. A Holistic Approach to
include in all Processes
Rural Perspective
Systemic Safety Analysis
Road Safety Audits
Local Road Safety Plans
Safety Coalitions
Graphic Source: FHWA
https://www.youtube.com/wat
ch?v=1Gtz0qjPx0M
https://safety.fhwa.do
t.gov/LRSPDIY/
August 13,
2022
| 36
www.ruralsafetycenter.org
37. Safe Streets and Roads
for All (SS4A) Grant
Program
Funds regional, local and Tribal initiatives to
prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries
Visit www.transportation.gov/SS4A to:
• Find resources, FAQs and application information
• Watch recorded “How to Apply” Webinars from June
Applications are due September 15, 2022
38. Swiss Cheese Model
The “SwissCheese Model” of redundancy
creates layers of protection
Death and serious injuries only happen
when all layers fail
Post-crash care
Safe roads
Safe
speeds
Safe
vehicles
Safe road
users
Post-crash care
Safe roads
Safe
speeds
Safe
vehicles
Safe road
users
Image Source: FHWA
Adapted from James Reason’s model for analyzing accident causation
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1990.0090
August 13,
2022
| 38
Graphic Source: FHWA
39. SSA: 5 Elements
Safe Road Users
SafeVehicles
Safe Speeds
Safe Roads
Post-Crash Care
August 13,
2022
| 39
Graphic Source: FHWA
40. Safe Road User Element
A Rural Perspective
Variety of road users
Bicyclists and pedestrians
Horse and buggies
Agricultural equipment
Motorcycles
Transit
Tourists unfamiliar with the area
Aging population
Different perceptions/safety
mindset
Photo Source: Jaime Sullivan, WTI
August 13,
2022
| 40
41. Safe Road Users
As a road user, we need to
have a safety mindset or
positive safety culture
Safe driving behaviors
Follow rules
Act within the limits of the
road design
August 13,
2022
| 41
Safety Culture = The beliefs
we share with other people
in our social groups that
influence driving decisions.
43. Safe Road User Element
Rural Resources & Examples
https://wtsc.wa.gov/pro
grams-priorities/tribes/
https://ruraldesignguide.c
om/
https://findmedriving.com/
https://ruralsafetycenter.o
rg
August 13,
2022
| 43
44. Safe Vehicle Element
A Rural Perspective & Examples
Personal vehicles
Drivers 70 and older tend to drive older,
smaller vehicles not equipped with
important safety features (IIHS)
Leveraging connected and automated
vehicle (CAV) technology to improve
safety
WY connected vehicle pilot
CO autonomous traffic mobile attenuator
truck
MO real-time digital warning system on
motorist assist vehicles
Graphic Source: FHWA Statistics source: https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/retirement-vehicles-raise-the-risk-of-crash-fatalities-for-older-drivers
August 13,
2022
| 44
45. Safe Speed Element
Why is speed a safety problem?
“without speed there can be no
movement, but with speed comes
kinetic energy and with kinetic energy
and human error come crashes, injuries,
and even deaths.”
August 13,
2022
| 45
Quote Source: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
46. Relationship of Speed to Likelihood of
Survival
Graphic Source: FHWA
August 13,
2022
| 46
49. Safe Speed Element
A Rural Perspective
Not about universally reducing speeds
Designing to meet user expectancies
Self-explaining roads
Self-enforcing roads
Matching speed appropriate to the road
conditions that exist
Vulnerable road users
Curves
Tourist areas
Weather
Source: FHWA
August 13,
2022
| 49
50. Safe Speed Element
Rural Resources & Examples
Photo Sources: Jaime Sullivan, WTI (top) and FHWA (bottom) and graphic source: FHWA
Speed Feedback Signs
Variable Speed Limits
August 13,
2022
| 50
https://www.ite.org/pub/?id=BCD
0260A-BF52-D7D0-44BD-
1C3CBE531AE8
51. Safe Road Element Discussion
August 13,
2022
| 51
Through the safe system lens, what is a safe road?
What does it look like?
Minimizing instances of conflict (for all users)
Manage impact angles
Manage impact energy distribution
Forgiving roadway and roadsides relative to the speed
environment
Separate users in space
Separate users in time
Increase attentiveness and awareness
Manage speed
52. Safe Road Element
Continuum – not an absolute
Design and operate roads to
continuously approach toward creating a Safe
System by implementing features appropriate for
the intended and actual road use and speed
environment
reduce the risk of error
manage crash levels within tolerable levels avoiding
sever outcomes
August 13,
2022
| 52
Source: FHWA
54. Safe Road Element Countermeasures
Rural Resources
August 13,
2022
| 54
https://www.nhtsa.gov/site
s/nhtsa.gov/files/2021-
09/15100_Countermeasur
es10th_080621_v5_tag.pd
f
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/
https://www.nsc.org/
road/resources/road-
to-zero/doubling-
down-on-what-
works#:~:text=The
%20Road%20to%20
Zero%20Coalition%
20bases%20its%20w
ork%20on%20a,in%
20the%20US%20by
%202050.
55. Safe Road Element
Rural Resources & Examples
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/FoR
RRwD/RwDPocketGuide.pdf
Driving FoRRRwD to a Safe System
(https://youtu.be/rpXxLSbmtU0)
Graphic Sources: FHWA
August 13,
2022
| 55
56. Safe Road Element
Complete Streets for
Rural AreasWebinar
July 27 1-2:30 pm ET
www.ruralsafetycenter.org
August 13,
2022
| 56
www.tribalsafety.org
57. Post-Crash Care Element
A Rural Perspective
Golden hour
Identification and notification of crash
Large geographic regions
Regionalizing hospitals
Graphic Source: FHWA (post-crash)
August 13,
2022
| 57
59. Post-Crash Care Element
Rural Resources
Data Sources, Webinars, & Partners
https://ruralsafetycenter.org/rural-
road-safety-awareness-week-
2022/the-intersection-of-rural-road-
safety-and-public-health/
August 13,
2022
| 59
Coming Soon:
Rural Lesson on Traffic
Incident Management
https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/tim/
60. Discussion Questions
What would it look like if we designed our roads
for safety and not speed?
Of the 5 Safe System Elements, which one is the
most important?
When can my organization start implementing?
August 13,
2022
| 60
61. Resources to Explore on Your Safe System Journey
National Center for Rural Road Safety
www.ruralsafetycenter.org
Road to Zero
https://www.nsc.org/road-safety/get-involved/road-to-zero
Toward Zero Deaths &Traffic Safety Culture
https://www.towardzerodeaths.org/traffic-safety-culture/
Vision Zero Network
https://visionzeronetwork.org/
Center for Health and Safety Culture
https://chsculture.org/
FHWA’s Safe System Materials
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/zerodeaths/zero_deaths_vision.cfm
ITE’s Safe System Material
https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/safe-systems/
Road to Zero’s Double Down onWhat Works Page
https://www.nsc.org/road/resources/road-to-zero/doubling-down-on-
what-works
FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/
NHTSA’s Countermeasure that Work
https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57466
FoRRRwd
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/FoRRRwd/
LRSP DIY Site
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/LRSPDIY/
Rural Opportunities to UseTransportation for Economic Success
(ROUTES)
https://www.transportation.gov/rural
Before I turn the presentation over to Hillary to discuss rural safety examples and countermeasures, I want to give you a brief overview of the National Center for Rural Road Safety
Next webinar - July 27: Complete Streets for Rural Areas
When live and breathe urban, you don’t always think about some of these issues.
In 10 minutes I cannot tell you everything, but I hope to give you enough background for you to understand why this distinction is important and to peak your curiosity to learn more and identify how you can help.
Today I will be focusing on the needs and challenges with the hopes that you will join us for part 2 of this webinar to hear more about some solutions and opportunities.
Local describes the jurisdiction that owns or manages the roads. For instance, a local road is owned or managed by a local agency such as a town or county. It is not federal or state-owned road.
Rural, however, describes the location and context of the road and surrounding community. While a road can be both, they are not dependent on each other. (For example, think about the rural stretches of interstate maintained by a state DOT).
Asked all the time to define rural – slightly different from each data source or funding source – typically thought of as anything outside an urban area (census, FARS (determined by state DOT and approved by FHWA)) or by population (less then 2500 residents – rural-urban continuum codes)
Usually can tell by look/feel – land use – you know it when you see it. Defined by the social and physical context – driver behaviors, land use, local culture, physical design
So, why does this distinction matter? There are significant difference in safety trends, resources, and characteristics. Let’s examine some of those characteristics.
Tourism-based or destination
Resource-based including ag and extraction
Older-age (missing from graphic)
Fatality rate is a huge difference between these two…almost 2 times higher in rural based on the population.
If we look at the top line between these two it is the population. Rural only makes up 19% of the US population while urban makes up 81%. For the fatalities, rural makes up 45% while urban makes up 53%. At one point rural was above urban but that number has since decreased. 71% of the public road miles are in rural areas where 29% are in urban. If you look at vehicle miles traveled only 30% are in rural areas and 70% are in urban areas. Keeping a comparison of this information when it comes to the challenges and differences between urban and rural is very important.
1/3 of ALL fatalities are rural roadway departure
1/3 of rural fatalities include speed as a factor
72% of rural fatal crashes occurred on roads with posted speed limit of 55mph or higher
60% of rural pickup occupants killed were unrestrained
Additional info –
Most head-on crashes on rural, non-Interstate roads are caused by motorist making an unintentional maneuver as a result of driver fatigue, distracted driving, or speeding in a curve
Same behavioral safety challenges – seat belts, distracted driving, alcohol and drug impairment, speeding, older/younger drivers, but rural experience often imposes unique challenges and solutions
Aren’t All Roads the Same?
Shallow/open ditches - narrow lanes, no shoulders, higher speeds
unique terrain (e.g., horizontal and vertical curves) Much of the beauty in rural areas is due to the unique terrain, but with that comes varying road conditions and weather impacts that could cause safety impacts.
different road types (e.g., unpaved, uncontrolled intersections, deteriorating bridges - Average detour required by a closed or posted bridge is 2 times longer in rural than urban areas due to lack of alternative routes)
different road infrastructure (e.g., narrow lanes, lack of shoulders, shallow/open ditches, higher speeds, less lighting)
Smaller populations, less congestion and traffic
Impacts of natural disasters and climate change – less likely to rebuild (or do so fast), impact could be to only route (VT hurricane people stuck), less places to stop, alt routes (think WY trucks). less developed infrastructure and maintenance may be a relatively lower priority. Weather can also be severe, or rather roadways are less likely to be cleared in a timely and comprehensive fashion.
Climate change - fires, hurricanes, flooding, impacts rural vs urban differently for evacuation as well as rebuilding
Lack of alternative routes
Different road user mix (e.g., Slow moving vehicles (agricultural equipment, horse and buggies) motorcycles, recreational vehicles)
Freight - 47% of all truck VMT occur in rural areas
Transit - Lack of Sustainable options for mobility – due to distance and ridership
Rural is more car dependent
Cars – older – less safety features
Bottom Picture 3 – increased animal activity on roadway and opportunities for collisions
increased number of tourists unfamiliar with the area
Many tourism and recreational areas (like national parks and public lands, ski resorts, large lakes) are in rural areas, but with an increase in tourists comes an increase in drivers unfamiliar with terrain, road conditions, and weather we just mentioned.
Rural Travelers
44% of rural passenger vehicle traffic is urban residents
Roadway environment in rural tends to be designed for cars and not bikes/peds – large issue when a high speed rural road becomes the main street in town
Behavioral safety and social issues - Different risk perception public feels that because there is less traffic, there are less crashes and with less deterrence (enforcement), feel more comfortable making bad choices – false sense of security – less fear of a crash. For example, drivers may feel that because there is less traffic, there are less crashes and with less deterrence or enforcement, and they may feel more comfortable making risky choices. And finally, a different mindset may lead to unique barriers with behavioral factors such as less seat belt use.
Rural specific safety campaigns – urban campaigns don’t always transfer to rural but with less people, may be perception that the cost is too much to tailor to rural.
Helping neighbors - pull people out of ditch and don’t report – quicker than tow truck and do not report to police or insurance
Easier to ticket someone you don’t know them a community member
Resources/funding– less staff, sparse law enforcement, less funding – staff wear more hats – transportation and/or safety not only job. The smaller population means more recruitment and retention challenges with staff and more funding challenges. Lower AADT may mean less funding – less options for required match for federal dollars. Not all agencies are created equal – some need collaborations and partnerships to help. Affects everything from preventive maintenance to enforcement.
Data – systemic approach to identify risk – can’t find hot spot crashes – pull people out of ditch and don’t report – quicker than tow truck and do not report to police or insurance – can’t chase the fatals – need to look at risks. Good data = better results faster for owners, operators, and elected officials
Lack of Communications and power – challenges for technology and innovation including CAV – notification and detection for crashes
Large geographical jurisdictions – lead to longer detection, notification and arrival time for crashes, more difficult for enforcement, harder on maintenance and clearing roads for snow. The long distance from point a to b that rural areas are known for, also means fewer alternative routes
Post-crash care - Additional advanced training for dispatchers, Detection/notification/arrival times, Closing of medical facilities – long transport times, Volunteers
Time on Slide: 2 minutes
Suggested Comments/Key Message: So, what separates the Safe System approach from the traditional approach to safety? It requires a shift in our road safety perspective – how we perceive the problem and solution. Unlike the traditional approach where our priority was the efficient movement of people and goods, in the Safe System approach, our priority is safety.
Similar to the traditional approach, the safe system approach encompasses the elements of the 4Es (Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Engineering), but as discussed on the previous slide, it refocuses efforts on reducing death and serious injury through accommodating human mistakes and reducing impact forces to tolerable levels. The main difference in the Safe System approach from the traditional approach to safety is the moral imperative that not even one death is acceptable in our roadway system. However, implementing the Safe System approach also requires moving away from several other traditional safety paradigms. For example:
(click once for animation) Rather than preventing crashes, the Safe System approach seeks to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries
(click once for animation) In addition to trying to improve human behavior, the Safe System approach designs for human mistakes and limitations
(click once for animation) While the traditional safety approach focuses on controlling speeding, the Safe System approach attempts to reduce system kinetic energy
(click once for animation) Rather than asserting that only individuals are responsible, the Safe System approach aims to share responsibility among system users, managers, and others
(click once for animation) Instead of reacting based on crash history, the Safe System approach proactively identifies and addresses risks (such as the systemic approach we discussed earlier)
Facilitation Guidance/Interactivity: click 5 times to add each row in the animation.
Potential Answers/Sample Q&A: n/a
Reference Materials: Source: FHWA’s Safe System Approach Presentation https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/zerodeaths/docs/safety_systems_pres_rv012621.pptx
Time on Slide: 1 minute
Suggested Comments/Key Message: The Safe System approach (shown on the slide) is comprised of six “principles” and five “elements.”
The six principles are the fundamental beliefs that the approach is built on and are depicted around the outside if the graphic (click once for animation). They establish the goal of the Safe System approach, acknowledge human limitations, and set expectations for how to act. A successful Safe System approach weaves together all six principles.
(Click once for animation) The five elements, shown in the middle of the ring, are conduits through which the Safe System approach must be implemented. Making a commitment to zero deaths means addressing every aspect of crash risks through the five elements of a Safe System. These layers of protection and shared responsibility promote a holistic approach to safety across the entire roadway system.
Facilitation Guidance/Interactivity: Click the first time to highlight the 6 principles and the second time to highlight the five elements.
Potential Answers/Sample Q&A: n/a
Reference Materials: Source: FHWA’s Safe System Approach Presentation https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/zerodeaths/docs/safety_systems_pres_rv012621.pptx
Time on Slide: 2 minutes
Suggested Comments/Key Message: First, let’s take a closer look at the 6 Safe System Principles.
Death and serious injury is unacceptable – with this principle we acknowledge that the priority is saving lives. Therefore, if a countermeasure will prevent deaths, even if it increases the total number of crashes, it should be considered.
Humans make mistakes – earlier in this module we talked more in depth about human factors and human error. It is important that we design for this error and not just try to change the error.
Humans are vulnerable - people have a limited ability to tolerate crash impacts before death and serious injuries occur. Human tolerance to crash impacts is central to the Safe System approach. The Safe System approach focuses not just on managing speed but managing transfer of kinetic energy to within survivable limits.
Responsibility is shared – we need to remember that road safety is everyone’s job, regardless of whether “safety” is in your job title. We all need to work together to implement a safety system approach to get to zero.
Safety is proactive – we should not wait for a fatality to occur to improve safety. Instead, we should be proactive in all aspects such as the systemic safety data analysis that we talked about earlier, public awareness campaigns, preventative maintenance such as cutting back vegetation and testing sign retroreflectivity.
Redundancy is crucial – layered or redundant safety measures ensure that if there are weaknesses in individual parts of the system, other parts of the system will compensate to not allow a failure or fatality.
Facilitation Guidance/Interactivity: If you are interested in additional details and examples for the redundancy principle, see the resource section below.
Potential Answers/Sample Q&A: n/a
Reference Materials: Source: FHWA’s Safe System Approach Presentation https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/zerodeaths/docs/safety_systems_pres_rv012621.pptx
A good example (from FHWA) of how the five Safe System elements work together to create redundancy is distracted driving. Education campaigns focused on alert driving—avoiding behaviors like texting while driving—help create safe road users. Vehicle safety systems, like lane departure warnings, create safe vehicles that alert distracted drivers to potential hazards. Enforcement can help maintain safe speeds, so that if an incident should occur due to distracted driving, impact forces on the human body remain within tolerable levels. Infrastructure like rumble strips creates safe roads and an additional layer of redundancy to warn distracted drivers about a potential roadway departure. Sometimes, all these measures are not enough to prevent a distracted driving crash from occurring, but efficient, rapid post-crash care can help this mistake not be fatal.
Crashes - recognizing that these are not purely accidents…but rather something we can predict & prevent.
Time on Slide: 4 minutes
Suggested Comments/Key Message: We talked about the statistics on the previous slide to show the gravity of the situation and provide an understanding, but it is key that we realize these aren’t just statistics…each of these fatalities is a person with a name, face, family and friends. So, we are now going to watch two brief videos on the impact of safety. The first video is from Transport Accident Commission in Victoria called “There’s No One Someone Won’t Miss.” [play video] The second video is from Clackamas County, Oregon called Drive to Zero: Our Community Talks Safety.” [play video]
As transportation professionals, our mission is to save lives, it is at the core of what we do. When we ask how many traffic deaths are acceptable, the answer is always ZERO. Each one of those lives is someone else’s most important person…a parent, child, grandparent, best friend, co-worker, mentor…
Facilitation Guidance/Interactivity: The Transport Accident Commission in Victoria called “There’s No One Someone Won’t Miss” is 1 minute long. The Clackamas County, Oregon called Drive to Zero: Our Community Talks Safety is 2 minutes 45 seconds long. Play the videos for the audience. The poll icon in the top right is a reminder that a poll will be on the next slide.
Potential Answers/Sample Q&A: n/a
Reference Materials:
We may be very competent and have honed our skills, but we can add attitudes and behaviors that can degrade that competence (e.g., speeding).
Kinetic energy = ½ mass*velocity^2
Velocity is a vector including speed and direction (angle of impact)
Energy that objects possess due to their motion
Exponential – KE at 80 mph is 2.1 times that of 55 mph
As the chart shows, people have a limited ability to tolerate crash impacts before death and serious injuries occur. Human tolerance to crash impacts is central to the Safe System approach. The management of kinetic energy transfer to within survivable limits is important for understanding how to design and operate the road system consistently with the Safe System philosophy. The Safe System approach focuses not just on managing speed but managing transfer of kinetic energy.
as crash kinetic energy increases, so too does the potential of serious injury and death. It does not take particularly high kinetic energy levels for the potential of serious injury to occur.
As we saw on the last slide, the human body is vulnerable and unlikely to survive an uncushioned impact at a speed of more than about 20 mph. Even relatively low speeds can kill or seriously injure unless the vehicle and the road environment take account of the physical vulnerability of all road users.
Changing an impact angle from 90° to 40° reduces kinetic energy about the same as if speeds were about 30kph (20 mph) less
Is this why roundabouts are so effective at reducing severe crashes? YES !!!
It cannot be achieved by engineering alone
Suggested Comments/Key Message: Although we discussed this a few slides ago when we talked about the 6 principles of the Safe System Approach, it is important that we discuss the “shared responsibility” principle in more detail. In transitioning from the traditional approach to safety to the safe system approach, it is imperative that we break down our siloes and take a holistic, multi-disciplinary approach to safer roads and saving lives where coordination and collaboration is key. We all have a responsibility to promote safe behavior and ensure that crashes don’t lead to fatal or serious injuries. This includes system managers, vehicle manufacturers, law enforcement, post-crash care, system users, public health, educators, local elected officials, and others.
The question is, how do we identify our common and overlapping goals and bring our unique perspectives and specific strategies for safety together to work toward our common goal of zero?
Facilitation Guidance/Interactivity: n/a
Potential Answers/Sample Q&A: n/a
Reference Materials: n/a
First speaker – talked about safe system and it’s tie to zero
Knowing that our goal is zero fatalities and serious injuries, we use a framework called the safe system approach to get there, but positive traffic safety culture is an essential foundation to reach the goal. Each of these concepts intertwine with the other and we need them all to improve safety on US roadways, so we are going to spend some time discussing each of these in more depth.
Keeping the definition of safety culture in mind our organizations shared beliefs need to be the safe system principles to affect our behaviors or the actions we take to improve traffic safety or grow a positive traffic safety culture
Impacting traffic safety starts with change at the micro-level of the individual and then ripples out from there. Everyone needs a champion, leader, advocate – could that be you?
Signs that your organization has a good safety culture is that everyone has a safety attitude
Create a balance of safety, access, livability, community and economic development
Double down on what works, accelerate technology, prioritize safety – 3 action items for road to zero
Remember that 1 person can make a difference
Practice what you preach – start from within your own organization
Organizational traffic safety (and safety in general) is an important issue for workplaces
To adopt a SSA, we must also adopt the underlying safety culture by adding the 6 SS principles to our beliefs (values, assumptions) and then think of these and include in everything we do – holistic approach
SSA is a holistic approach to safer roads and saving lives where coordination and collaboration is key to reducing fatalities and serious injuries on US Roadways.
bringing our unique perspectives and specific strategies for safety together so we can identify our common and overlapping goals?
Opportunity to address some of the key rural challenges:
Lack of host spot crash locations – use systemic safety analysis which changes your safety planning process from Reactive to proactive, Localized to systemic, and Events based to risk based. Follows SSA safety being proactive.
Lack of data – use a road safety audit/assessment. Which is a multidisciplinary, independent team, observes traffic under conditions of interest, locates potential safety issues. Follows SSA principle of safety being a shared responsibility.
Lack of funding – a Local Road Safety Plan can help locals explain/show their need for funding – use the new FHWA LRSP DIY site with resources and trainings. Also multi-disciplinary and should feed into a state Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Typically include a goal of zero fatalities and serious injuries. Follows SSA principle of death and serious injury being unacceptable, safety being proactive, safety being a shared responsibility, and redundancy being crucial.
Lack of resource – safety coalitions are a great way to pool resources and funding. Follows SSA principle of death and serious injury being unacceptable (usually a zero goal), safety being a shared responsibility (multidisciplinary team), and redundancy being crucial (multidisciplinary team – enforcement, engineering, education, behavioral side, post-crash care – holistic look).
The Safe Streets for All (SS4A) is a new program established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
The primary goal of SS4A grants is to improve roadway safety by supporting communities in developing comprehensive safety action plans based on a Safe System Approach, and implementing projects and strategies that significantly reduce or eliminate transportation-related fatalities and serious injuries.
Who is eligible to apply for grant funding?
Metropolitan planning organizations;
Counties, cities, towns, and transit agencies or other special districts that are subdivisions of a State;
Federally recognized Tribal governments; and
Multijurisdictional groups comprised of the above entities.
“How to Apply” webinars will feature information to help potential applicants learn about the SS4A grant program and what they need to know to prepare an application. The first webinar will provide a general overview of the program, while the next two webinars will delve more deeply into each type of grant offered: Action Plan Grants and Implementation Grants.
TITLE: How to Apply for SS4A Grants: General Overview
This webinar will offer a general overview of the SS4A program, the grant application process, and the available grant types.
Monday, June 13, 1:00-3:00 p.m. (EDT)
Register to attend the June 13 webinar.
TITLE: How to Apply for SS4A: Action Plan Grants
This webinar will offer a general overview of the SS4A program and the grant application process and provide a particular focus on applying for Action Plan Grants.
Wednesday, June 15, 1:00-3:00 p.m. (EDT)
Register to attend the June 15 webinar.
TITLE: How to Apply for SS4A: Implementation Grants
This webinar will offer a general overview of the SS4A program and the grant application process and provide a particular focus on applying for Implementation Grants.
Thursday, June 23, 1:00-3:00 p.m. (EDT)
Register to attend the June 23 webinar.
SS4A applications are due on Sept. 15, 2022
For more information visit: https://www.transportation.gov/SS4A.
Different perceptions/safety mindset - Smaller populations, less congestion and traffic, different risk perception on “open road”
Separating road users in space and time
Increasing attentiveness and awareness
Male pickup drivers and seatbelt campaigns
Together for Life Utah
Social norming and microtargeting
Washington Traffic Safety Commission’s Tribal specific PSAs
IIHS report on retirement vehicles
Older drivers are more vulnerable, and less likely to survive a crash
One reason – don’t understand the value of advanced safety features or good safety ratings
WY – alerts commercial vehicles and public about weather conditions
CO – TMA – protects the mobile work zone truck while putting paint on the highway – autonomously follows a leader truck
MO – Using HAAS Alert – when an emergency response operator/motorist assist vehicles turns on their lights, an alert goes out to TMC and waze
There is a direct relationship between the speed at which a vehicle is traveling and the likelihood of survival for the person being hit. 9 out of 10 pedestrians are likely to survive if hit by a vehicle traveling around 20 MPH, while only 1 in 10 pedestrians will likely survive an impact at around 60 MPH.
Size and motion judgement, this is where the younger driver is probably penalized more so than the older driver. To judge the speed of a vehicle, we see it in the distance as a certain portion of our visual field. As it gets closer, it looks like it is getting larger and larger (obviously it is not as it is the same physical vehicle), but this is how we mentally calculate approach speed, however, it doesn’t always work. If what you are seeing is a motorcycle off in the distance, particularly if in nighttime conditions with only the headlight, can you judge by the intensity of the light, how quickly it is coming? And what if what you are seeing is not a motorcycle, but a vehicle with one light out?
Self-explaining roads – consistency, no mixed messages (e.g., a mixed message would be putting a permanent, overhead DMS which is typically on a freeway on a rural roads instead)
Self-enforcing roads – visually showing changes (e.g., when a rural high-speed roads becomes a rural town center and has a change in speed, it should also include visual changes such as mid block crosswalks, raised medians, curb extensions, street parking, and vegetation)
Reducing speed accommodates human injury tolerance by:
Reducing impact forces
Providing additional time for drivers to stop
Improving visibility
Speed feedback signs – CT Training & Technical Assistance Center program - https://ctt2.center/2020/09/15/safety-matters-speed-display-driver-feedback-sign-program/
Roundabouts – reduce severe crashes – lower speeds, lower impact angles, fewer conflict points – Lummi Nation
Variable speed limits
Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures
Manage impact angles – roundabout
Manage impact energy distribution
Low cost safety improvements
Rwd is a huge challenge in rural area – FoRRRwD can help
Vital post-crash actions include: first responders, medical care, crash investigation, traffic incident management, and justice
Rural ITS toolkit – Crash countermeasures, traffic management, operations and maintenance, emergency services, surface transportation and weather, rural transit and mobility, and tourism and travel information
FHWA Rural TIM lesson coming soon