Jonathan works at a local restaurant. His employer recently started a campaign for employees to contribute to a national charity by giving a small percentage of their paychecks each week. Jonathan believes that the employer is doing this because last year the employer was caught bribing an elected official. In the given scenario, is Jonathan an egoist? Why or why not? What are both sides to this issue? Which side is ethical? Defend your opinion. Solution no, jonathan is not an egoist because it is a campaign and its just up to him whether he wants to join the campaign or not. The employer might have started this campaign to rectify his mistake but making it as a compulsion is not right on his side. Jonathan is also right with his point of view because no one can be forced to join a campaign and it is entirely up to him. In this case until the employees are forced to join, both sides are ethical. .