Enviar búsqueda
Cargar
Developing an EL Textbook Evaluation Checklist
•
11 recomendaciones
•
18,606 vistas
Salina Saharudin
Seguir
an interesting article to read in understanding textbook evaluation with the checklist
Leer menos
Leer más
Educación
Tecnología
Denunciar
Compartir
Denunciar
Compartir
1 de 8
Descargar ahora
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Recomendados
Communicative language testing
Communicative language testing
Ida Mantra
Designing classroom language test
Designing classroom language test
Ratih Puspitasari
Structural Syllabus Design
Structural Syllabus Design
Syao Chan
Syllabus
Syllabus
Islamic Azad University (IAU)- دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
Assessments, concepts and issues
Assessments, concepts and issues
Rahila Khan
Needs Analysis
Needs Analysis
Carlos Mayora
Principles of Language Assessment
Principles of Language Assessment
SubramanianMuthusamy3
SKILL BASED SYLLABUS
SKILL BASED SYLLABUS
Aillen Goleña
Recomendados
Communicative language testing
Communicative language testing
Ida Mantra
Designing classroom language test
Designing classroom language test
Ratih Puspitasari
Structural Syllabus Design
Structural Syllabus Design
Syao Chan
Syllabus
Syllabus
Islamic Azad University (IAU)- دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
Assessments, concepts and issues
Assessments, concepts and issues
Rahila Khan
Needs Analysis
Needs Analysis
Carlos Mayora
Principles of Language Assessment
Principles of Language Assessment
SubramanianMuthusamy3
SKILL BASED SYLLABUS
SKILL BASED SYLLABUS
Aillen Goleña
Fundamental concepts and principles in Language Testing
Fundamental concepts and principles in Language Testing
Phạm Phúc Khánh Minh
Designing classroom language tests
Designing classroom language tests
Sutrisno Evenddy
Adapting A Language Textbook
Adapting A Language Textbook
wilsdom
Kinds of tests and testing
Kinds of tests and testing
Maury Martinez
Approaches to language testing
Approaches to language testing
Ma Elena Oblino Abainza
Language testing I by my lecture
Language testing I by my lecture
Nurul Faradillah
Grammatical based syllabus. Akram Jabar Najim
Grammatical based syllabus. Akram Jabar Najim
AkramEnglish
Chapter 3(designing classroom language tests)
Chapter 3(designing classroom language tests)
Kheang Sokheng
Content based syllabus
Content based syllabus
Savera Hayyam
Communicative testing presentation
Communicative testing presentation
santoshector
Course planning and syllabus design
Course planning and syllabus design
Annastasya Tasya
Language testing
Language testing
ahmedabbas1121
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabus
Uspan Sayuti
Language testing and evaluation
Language testing and evaluation
esra66
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabus
Fariba Chamani
Skill based syllabus
Skill based syllabus
Sandy Alice
Test Usefulness
Test Usefulness
sara_galastarxy
Selecting and grading product orientated syllabus
Selecting and grading product orientated syllabus
Noveera Jaffar
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptx
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptx
AREEJ ALDAEJ
Assessment and testing language
Assessment and testing language
Ma Luz Kantu
Textbook analysis
Textbook analysis
Heni Winingsih
Analysis Text Book
Analysis Text Book
Widiyani Eka Putri
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
Fundamental concepts and principles in Language Testing
Fundamental concepts and principles in Language Testing
Phạm Phúc Khánh Minh
Designing classroom language tests
Designing classroom language tests
Sutrisno Evenddy
Adapting A Language Textbook
Adapting A Language Textbook
wilsdom
Kinds of tests and testing
Kinds of tests and testing
Maury Martinez
Approaches to language testing
Approaches to language testing
Ma Elena Oblino Abainza
Language testing I by my lecture
Language testing I by my lecture
Nurul Faradillah
Grammatical based syllabus. Akram Jabar Najim
Grammatical based syllabus. Akram Jabar Najim
AkramEnglish
Chapter 3(designing classroom language tests)
Chapter 3(designing classroom language tests)
Kheang Sokheng
Content based syllabus
Content based syllabus
Savera Hayyam
Communicative testing presentation
Communicative testing presentation
santoshector
Course planning and syllabus design
Course planning and syllabus design
Annastasya Tasya
Language testing
Language testing
ahmedabbas1121
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabus
Uspan Sayuti
Language testing and evaluation
Language testing and evaluation
esra66
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabus
Fariba Chamani
Skill based syllabus
Skill based syllabus
Sandy Alice
Test Usefulness
Test Usefulness
sara_galastarxy
Selecting and grading product orientated syllabus
Selecting and grading product orientated syllabus
Noveera Jaffar
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptx
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptx
AREEJ ALDAEJ
Assessment and testing language
Assessment and testing language
Ma Luz Kantu
La actualidad más candente
(20)
Fundamental concepts and principles in Language Testing
Fundamental concepts and principles in Language Testing
Designing classroom language tests
Designing classroom language tests
Adapting A Language Textbook
Adapting A Language Textbook
Kinds of tests and testing
Kinds of tests and testing
Approaches to language testing
Approaches to language testing
Language testing I by my lecture
Language testing I by my lecture
Grammatical based syllabus. Akram Jabar Najim
Grammatical based syllabus. Akram Jabar Najim
Chapter 3(designing classroom language tests)
Chapter 3(designing classroom language tests)
Content based syllabus
Content based syllabus
Communicative testing presentation
Communicative testing presentation
Course planning and syllabus design
Course planning and syllabus design
Language testing
Language testing
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabus
Language testing and evaluation
Language testing and evaluation
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabus
Skill based syllabus
Skill based syllabus
Test Usefulness
Test Usefulness
Selecting and grading product orientated syllabus
Selecting and grading product orientated syllabus
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptx
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptx
Assessment and testing language
Assessment and testing language
Destacado
Textbook analysis
Textbook analysis
Heni Winingsih
Analysis Text Book
Analysis Text Book
Widiyani Eka Putri
CRITERIA FOR TEXTBOOK EVALUATION
CRITERIA FOR TEXTBOOK EVALUATION
Vanessa William
Textbook evaluation in EFL/ESL
Textbook evaluation in EFL/ESL
Yamith José Fandiño Parra
Textbook Evaluation Checklist
Textbook Evaluation Checklist
Salina Saharudin
Textbook Evaluation
Textbook Evaluation
Ministry of National Education, Morocco
Evaluating Your Textbook
Evaluating Your Textbook
Embajada de EEUU en Argentina
Textbook evaluation
Textbook evaluation
porntipb
Destacado
(8)
Textbook analysis
Textbook analysis
Analysis Text Book
Analysis Text Book
CRITERIA FOR TEXTBOOK EVALUATION
CRITERIA FOR TEXTBOOK EVALUATION
Textbook evaluation in EFL/ESL
Textbook evaluation in EFL/ESL
Textbook Evaluation Checklist
Textbook Evaluation Checklist
Textbook Evaluation
Textbook Evaluation
Evaluating Your Textbook
Evaluating Your Textbook
Textbook evaluation
Textbook evaluation
Similar a Developing an EL Textbook Evaluation Checklist
Evaluative checklist
Evaluative checklist
Montasser Mahmoud
A Suggested Eclectic Checklist For ELT Coursebook Evaluation
A Suggested Eclectic Checklist For ELT Coursebook Evaluation
Lisa Muthukumar
Tsl 3123 Language Assessment Module ppg
Tsl 3123 Language Assessment Module ppg
Ravi Nair
Materials development for language learning and teaching
Materials development for language learning and teaching
Bike
CRITERIA TO ANALYZE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR THE I CYCLE OF...
CRITERIA TO ANALYZE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR THE I CYCLE OF...
UNIVERSIDAD MAGISTER (Sitio Oficial)
Textbook selection in ELT
Textbook selection in ELT
Yamith José Fandiño Parra
Thinking About Curriculum (ASCD)
Thinking About Curriculum (ASCD)
rirvan
Specific Assessment Tools in Language (RUBRICS)
Specific Assessment Tools in Language (RUBRICS)
Abby Grace B. Amigable
Developing a comprehensive empirically based research framework for classroom...
Developing a comprehensive empirically based research framework for classroom...
ahfameri
Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroo...
Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroo...
Amir Hamid Forough Ameri
Analysis and Evaluation of English 6th Grade textbook used in Greek public Sc...
Analysis and Evaluation of English 6th Grade textbook used in Greek public Sc...
Lori Head
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN ELT
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN ELT
Brittany Brown
MAE522 Module 4: The Curriculum Development Process
MAE522 Module 4: The Curriculum Development Process
eckchela
Paper Presented at Tehran University
Paper Presented at Tehran University
fatemehphd
Table of specification
Table of specification
chungchua17
A Literature Review Of Assessment For Learning In Science
A Literature Review Of Assessment For Learning In Science
Jim Webb
Esp section 3 application
Esp section 3 application
nisa linguistik
Syllabus design copy
Syllabus design copy
asiyachaudhry asiyachaudhry
Syllabus%20 design%20 %20copy
Syllabus%20 design%20 %20copy
asiyachaudhry asiyachaudhry
Teaching learning skills at post secondary level - from critique to pedagogic...
Teaching learning skills at post secondary level - from critique to pedagogic...
The Free School
Similar a Developing an EL Textbook Evaluation Checklist
(20)
Evaluative checklist
Evaluative checklist
A Suggested Eclectic Checklist For ELT Coursebook Evaluation
A Suggested Eclectic Checklist For ELT Coursebook Evaluation
Tsl 3123 Language Assessment Module ppg
Tsl 3123 Language Assessment Module ppg
Materials development for language learning and teaching
Materials development for language learning and teaching
CRITERIA TO ANALYZE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR THE I CYCLE OF...
CRITERIA TO ANALYZE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR THE I CYCLE OF...
Textbook selection in ELT
Textbook selection in ELT
Thinking About Curriculum (ASCD)
Thinking About Curriculum (ASCD)
Specific Assessment Tools in Language (RUBRICS)
Specific Assessment Tools in Language (RUBRICS)
Developing a comprehensive empirically based research framework for classroom...
Developing a comprehensive empirically based research framework for classroom...
Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroo...
Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroo...
Analysis and Evaluation of English 6th Grade textbook used in Greek public Sc...
Analysis and Evaluation of English 6th Grade textbook used in Greek public Sc...
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN ELT
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN ELT
MAE522 Module 4: The Curriculum Development Process
MAE522 Module 4: The Curriculum Development Process
Paper Presented at Tehran University
Paper Presented at Tehran University
Table of specification
Table of specification
A Literature Review Of Assessment For Learning In Science
A Literature Review Of Assessment For Learning In Science
Esp section 3 application
Esp section 3 application
Syllabus design copy
Syllabus design copy
Syllabus%20 design%20 %20copy
Syllabus%20 design%20 %20copy
Teaching learning skills at post secondary level - from critique to pedagogic...
Teaching learning skills at post secondary level - from critique to pedagogic...
Más de Salina Saharudin
Technical English 2 (May 2015) - Reading Material
Technical English 2 (May 2015) - Reading Material
Salina Saharudin
Course Outline Technical English 2 31534
Course Outline Technical English 2 31534
Salina Saharudin
Course Outline Materials Development and Adaptation
Course Outline Materials Development and Adaptation
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 6
Lecture 6
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 5 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 5 Materials Development and Adaptation
Salina Saharudin
Material lect5
Material lect5
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 4 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 4 Materials Development and Adaptation
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 3 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 3 Materials Development and Adaptation
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 2 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 2 Materials Development and Adaptation
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 1 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 1 Materials Development and Adaptation
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Salina Saharudin
Chapter 2 : CS Components
Chapter 2 : CS Components
Salina Saharudin
Chapter 2 : IT Components
Chapter 2 : IT Components
Salina Saharudin
Course Outline - Materials Development & Adaptation
Course Outline - Materials Development & Adaptation
Salina Saharudin
Course Outline - Technology in ELT 1/14/34
Course Outline - Technology in ELT 1/14/34
Salina Saharudin
Online Task
Online Task
Salina Saharudin
Technical English ll - Mosquitoes
Technical English ll - Mosquitoes
Salina Saharudin
Technical English ll - Getting a New Job
Technical English ll - Getting a New Job
Salina Saharudin
Identifying Verbs and Adverbs
Identifying Verbs and Adverbs
Salina Saharudin
Lecture 4 Examples of Writing
Lecture 4 Examples of Writing
Salina Saharudin
Más de Salina Saharudin
(20)
Technical English 2 (May 2015) - Reading Material
Technical English 2 (May 2015) - Reading Material
Course Outline Technical English 2 31534
Course Outline Technical English 2 31534
Course Outline Materials Development and Adaptation
Course Outline Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 6
Lecture 6
Lecture 5 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 5 Materials Development and Adaptation
Material lect5
Material lect5
Lecture 4 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 4 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 3 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 3 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 2 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 2 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 1 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 1 Materials Development and Adaptation
Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Chapter 2 : CS Components
Chapter 2 : CS Components
Chapter 2 : IT Components
Chapter 2 : IT Components
Course Outline - Materials Development & Adaptation
Course Outline - Materials Development & Adaptation
Course Outline - Technology in ELT 1/14/34
Course Outline - Technology in ELT 1/14/34
Online Task
Online Task
Technical English ll - Mosquitoes
Technical English ll - Mosquitoes
Technical English ll - Getting a New Job
Technical English ll - Getting a New Job
Identifying Verbs and Adverbs
Identifying Verbs and Adverbs
Lecture 4 Examples of Writing
Lecture 4 Examples of Writing
Último
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
Elizabeth Walsh
Vishram Singh - Textbook of Anatomy Upper Limb and Thorax.. Volume 1 (1).pdf
Vishram Singh - Textbook of Anatomy Upper Limb and Thorax.. Volume 1 (1).pdf
ssuserdda66b
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Celine George
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Admir Softic
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
Amanpreet Kaur
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
dhanjurrannsibayan2
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
Celine George
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Pooky Knightsmith
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
camerronhm
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
RamjanShidvankar
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Denish Jangid
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
Celine George
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
MaryamAhmad92
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
christianmathematics
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
agholdier
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
Mebane Rash
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
jbellavia9
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Association for Project Management
Último
(20)
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
Vishram Singh - Textbook of Anatomy Upper Limb and Thorax.. Volume 1 (1).pdf
Vishram Singh - Textbook of Anatomy Upper Limb and Thorax.. Volume 1 (1).pdf
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Developing an EL Textbook Evaluation Checklist
1.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 Volume 4, Number 6 Developing An English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist Jayakaran Mukundan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia Reza Hajimohammadi, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia Vahid Nimehchisalem, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia ABSTRACT The paper describes the considerations that were taken into account in the development of a tentative English language textbook evaluation checklist. A brief review of the related literature precedes the crucial issues that should be considered in developing checklists. In the light of the previous evaluation checklists the developers created a list of the evaluative criteria on which the construct of the checklist could be established. The developers considered matters of validity, reliability and practicality in the process of its design; however, further research is in process to refine the checklist. Such an instrument could be used by curriculum designers, material developers and evaluators, as well as English language teachers. Keywords: English language material evaluation; textbook evaluation checklist INTRODUCTION A ccording to Sheldon (1988), we need to evaluate textbooks for two reasons. First, the evaluation will help the teacher or program developer in making decisions on selecting the appropriate textbook. Furthermore, evaluation of the merits and demerits of a textbook will familiarize the teacher with its probable weaknesses and strengths. This will enable teachers to make appropriate adaptations to the material in their future instruction. In this line, Cunningsworth (1995) and Ellis (1997) propose that textbook evaluation can be of three types, namely „pre-use‟, „in-use‟, and „post-use‟ evaluations. Evaluation of textbooks for pre-use, or predictive, purposes helps teachers in selecting the most appropriate textbook for a given language classroom by considering its prospective performance. The second type of evaluation aids the teacher to explore the weaknesses or strengths of the textbook while it is being used. Finally, post-use, or retrospective evaluation helps the teacher reflect on the quality of the textbook after it has been used in a particular learning-teaching situation. A checklist is an instrument that helps practitioners in English Language Teaching (ELT) evaluate language teaching materials, like textbooks. It allows a more sophisticated evaluation of the textbook in reference to a set of generalizable evaluative criteria. These checklists may be quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative scales have the merit of allowing an objective evaluation of a given textbook through Likert style rating scales (e.g., Skierso, 1991). Qualitative checklists, on the other hand, often use open-ended questions to elicit subjective information on the quality of course books (e.g., Richards, 2001). While qualitative checklists are capable of an indepth evaluation of textbooks, quantitative checklists are more reliable instruments and are more convenient to work with, especially when team evaluations are involved. The review of textbook evaluation checklists within four decades (1970-2000) by Mukundan and Ahour (2010) revealed that most of the checklists are qualitative (e.g., Rahimy, 2007; Driss, 2006; McDonough & Shaw, 2003; Rubdy, 2003; Garinger, 2002; Krug, 2002; McGrath, 2002; Garinger, 2001; Richards, 2001; Zabawa, 2001; Hemsley, 1997; Cunningsworth, 1995; Griffiths, 1995; Cunningsworth & Kusel, 1991; Harmer, 1991; Sheldon, 1988; Breen & Candlin, 1987; Dougill, 1987; Hutchinson & Waters, 1987; Matthews, 1985; Cunningsworth, 1984; Bruder, 1978; Haycraft , 1978; Robinett , 1978); than quantitative (e.g., Canado & Esteban, 2005; Litz, 2005; Miekley, 2005; Harmer, 1998; Peacock, 1997; Ur, 1996; Skierso, 1991; Sheldon, 1988; Grant, 1987; Williams, 1983; Daoud & Celce-Murcia, 1979; Tucker, 1978); or head words/outline format, i.e., those without rating scales or © 2011 The Clute Institute 21
2.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 Volume 4, Number 6 questions (Ansari & Babaii, 2002; Littlejohn, 1998; Roberts, 1996; Brown, 1995). Most of these checklists are either too short or too long and some criteria in them are vague, so they do not thoroughly meet the requirements of a good and applicable instrument for evaluation purposes. Despite their crucial roles in language instruction, most if not all the available textbook evaluation checklists have been developed qualitatively often with no empirical evidence in support of their construct validity. Additionally, even when fundamental matters like validity and reliability are accounted for, most of these checklists are impractical. For example, some make use of ELT terminology that sound ambiguous for language instructors with little expertise in the area. A further disadvantage of some of the available checklists is that because of the high number of their items they lack economy and hence practicality. This could be the reason why most language learning materials in the world are evaluated based on the subjective and impressionistic judgment of evaluators. DETERMINING THE EVALUATIVE CRITERIA English language teaching (ELT) material developers and evaluators need to take a wide range of factors into consideration before they make decisions on the materials they develop or select for particular contexts. Some of these factors include the roles of the learner, teacher, and instructional materials as well as the syllabus (Richards & Rodgers, 1987). In order to account for these roles effectively, the evaluator must gain an awareness of the learner and teacher‟s needs and interests (Bell & Gower, 1998). As it has been argued by some scholars (e.g., Byrd, 2001; Sheldon, 1988), evaluative criteria of checklists should be chosen according to the learning-teaching context and the specific needs of the learner and teacher. However, a review of the available checklists indicates that they have many identical evaluative criteria regardless of the fact that they had been developed in different parts of the world for different learning-teaching situations and purposes. Most well-established checklists such as Cunningsworth and Kusel (1991) or Skierso (1991) examine similar dimensions like physical attributes of textbooks including aims, layout, methodology, and organization. Some other criteria that are present in most checklists include the way language skills (speaking, listening, etc.), subskills (grammar, vocabulary, etc.), and functions are presented in the textbook depending on the present sociocultural setting (Zabawa, 2001; Ur, 1996; Cunningsworth, 1995; Harmer, 1991). In addition to the criteria mentioned above, a checklist must take into account the background of the target students who are going to use it. The background can encompass a variety of dimensions including students‟ age, needs and interests (Byrd, 2001; Skierso, 1991). Finally, the language used in the various texts of the textbook under evaluation should present natural and authentic examples of language use in the real world. According to Bell and Gower (1998), employing real language in the textbook contributes to the students‟ motivation by helping the teacher “get them off the learning plateau” (p. 123). Based on the review of the literature on the textbook evaluation checklists, the researchers created a tentative classification of textbook evaluation criteria (Figure 1). As the figure shows, we divided the list of criteria into the two general categories including „general attributes‟ and „learning-teaching content‟. The first category was further divided into five sub-categories of „relation to syllabus and curriculum‟, „methodology‟, „suitability to learners‟, „physical and utilitarian attributes‟, and „supplementary materials‟. The criteria in the second category, on the other hand, included „general‟ (i.e., task quality, cultural sensitivity, as well as linguistic and situational realism), „listening‟, „speaking‟, „reading‟, „writing‟, „vocabulary‟, „grammar‟, „pronunciation‟, and „exercises‟. 22 © 2011 The Clute Institute
3.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 Volume 4, Number 6 Textbook Evaluation Criteria I. General Attributes II. Learning-teaching Content 1. Relation to syllabus and curriculum 1. General 6. Vocabulary 2. Methodology 2. Listening 7. Grammar 3. Suitability to learners 3. Speaking 8. Pronunciation 4. Physical and utilitarian attributes 4. Reading 9. Exercises 5. Supplementary materials 5. Writing Figure 1. Classification of textbook evaluation criteria A TENTATIVE CHECKLIST FOR TEXTBOOK EVALUATION A tentative checklist was developed based on the classification indicated in Figure 1. Appendix (A) presents the checklist which consists of two main sections including „general attributes‟ and „learning-teaching content‟. These sections were further divided into several sub-categories following the aforementioned classification. In order to avoid misinterpretations of these features, the developers added one or more descriptors to each sub-category. To offer an example, three descriptors (items I.C.4-6) were added under „suitability to learners‟. These three items further would indicate a suitable textbook should account for learners‟ age, needs and interests. In the development of this checklist several points had to be considered. First was the issue of validity. To ensure the validity or relevance of any instrument, its developers must be aware of the relevant theories (Messick, 1994). In the light of their present teaching-learning situation, they should consider the construct domain being addressed and specify the criteria for evaluation of ELT materials, which, in turn, will show aspects of the evaluation procedure that may influence the final results and should, therefore, be closely considered. In order to be relevant to the context, a checklist should consider the purpose of evaluation, students, and other features discussed in the preceding section. The present checklist was developed based on a review of the similar previous instruments to ensure its construct validity. Meanwhile, certain items (e.g., items I.A.1, I.C.4-6, II.A.4) in the checklist would bring evaluators‟ attention to their present context. Tomlinson (2003) suggests avoiding large, vague, and dogmatic questions that might be interpreted differently by different evaluators. These factors, if eliminated in the trial process of the developed checklists may result in a more systematic, rigorous, and reliable evaluation. The clarity of the items should, therefore, be taken into consideration. A vague item can decrease the reliability of the instrument. There are certain checklists that fail to elaborate on some items which makes their comprehension very challenging for the novice evaluator. For instance, one of the items in Byrd (2001) describes the „Fit between textbook and the curriculum‟ as, “fits the pedagogical and SLA philosophy of the program/course” (p.427). Such an item may be easily discernable for an expert in the area; however, it will not be clear enough for an end-user with a low expertise. Developers should seek to design clear items if they really wish their checklist to be utilized. As an example, Skierso (1991) clearly describes the criterion of „vocabulary load‟, as “the number of new words introduced every lesson” (p. 446). This contributes to the clarity and, in turn, to the reliability of the instrument. © 2011 The Clute Institute 23
4.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 Volume 4, Number 6 In addition to validity and reliability, checklist developers should also take matters of practicality into account. A checklist must be economical, for instance. Cunningsworth (1995) suggests, “It is important to limit the number of criteria used, the number of questions asked, to manageable proportions, otherwise we risk being swamped in a sea of details” (p. 5). If a checklist is precise and short, it will be expeditious and save considerable time and budget once it is utilized for evaluation purposes. According to Mukundan and Ahour (2010), the length of the quantitative textbook evaluation checklists in their study ranged between 113 (Tucker, 1978) and 4553 (Skierso, 1991) running words. The developers of the present checklist made an attempt to come up with a relatively concise instrument. The number of running words in this checklist is 356, which turns out to be moderate compared to other similar checklists. This contributes to its economy. Another subject that should be noted in the operationalization of a checklist is the numerical value of its items. According to the literature, when faced with an odd-numbered scale, evaluators usually go for a middle score (McColloy & Remsted, 1965). This is known as the problem of “central tendency”; that is, “the inclination to rate people in the middle of the scale even when their performance clearly warrants a substantially higher or lower rating” (Grote, 1996, p. 138). To offer an example, in a five-point scale, an evaluator will more probably assign 3. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid odd-numbered scales when developing an instrument (Sager, 1972). However, as it is the case in most of the available checklists, a rating scale of 0-4 (where 4= Excellent, 3= Good, 2= Adequate, 1= Weak, and 0= Totally lacking) is the dominant form employed (e.g., Daoud & Celce-Murcia, 1979; Skierso, 1991). Furthermore, the end-users of checklists can be informed of the problem of central tendency and be advised to avoid it. Having considered these variables, a scale developer can hope to come up with a fair and viable checklist. CONCLUSION This paper discussed the development of a tentative textbook evaluation checklist. For this purpose, the related literature was reviewed and a list of important evaluative criteria was created. This list was further developed by adding one or more items under each category to describe it in detail. A five-point scale was added to the checklist to help the evaluators assess the textbook in reference to each item. A checklist of this type could be useful for pre-use, in-use and post-use textbook evaluation purposes (Ellis, 1997; Cunningsworth, 1995). Based on the results of such forms of evaluation, substantial educational and administrative decisions could be made that may have financial, professional, and/or political implications (Sheldon, 1988). The checklist could prove informative and useful for curriculum designers, ELT material developers or teachers in the classroom providing them with useful ideas according to which the materials being evaluated can be improved. The present checklist as it appears in this paper can be further refined through qualitative and/or quantitative studies. Focus group interviews can help the developers improve the clarity of the instrument. Furthermore, a survey of ELT material experts‟ evaluation of the checklist and a factor analysis of the collected data can provide empirical evidence for its inclusiveness. Finally, further research is also needed to test the correlation between the findings of the current checklist as compared to those of other well-established instruments. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Jayakaran Mukundan is a lecturer at the Faculty of Educational Studies, UPM, Malaysia and a visiting fellow at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK. He is also a Director on the Extensive Reading Foundation Board. His areas of interest include ESL writing and ELT textbook evaluation. Reza Hajimohammadi holds a Master and a Bachelor degree of TEFL. Prior to pursuing his PhD at University Putra Malaysia (UPM) he has been a lecturer in different universities and schools of Iran since 1989. His areas of interests include language teaching methodology, writing skill, and vocabulary learning. Vahid Nimehchisalem has been an English teacher, material developer, test developer, teacher trainer and lecturer. His areas of research interest include assessing writing, English Language Teaching (ELT) material evaluation and 24 © 2011 The Clute Institute
5.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 Volume 4, Number 6 ELT methods. He completed his PhD in Teaching English as a Second Language (TESL). He is involved in several research projects in the area of ELT in Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Ansari, H. & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal Characteristics of EFL/ESL Textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8 (2). Bell, J. & Gower, R. (1998). Writing course materials for the world: A great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (ed.). Material development in language teaching (pp. 116-129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Breen, M. & Candlin, C. (1987). What materials? A consumer‟s and designer‟s guide. In L. E. Shelden (ed.). ELT textbook and materials: Problems in evaluation and development. ELT Documents 126. (pp. 1328) Oxford: Modern English Publications in association with The British Council. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Bruder, M. N. (1978). Evaluation of foreign language textbooks: A simplified procedure. In H. S. Madsen & J. D. Bowen, eds. Adaptation in language teaching. Appendix 2 (pp. 209-218). Rowley, Mass: Newbury. Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implementation. In M. Celce-Murcia. Teaching English as a second or foreign language. (3rd Ed.) (pp. 415-427). US: Heinle & Heinle, Thomson Learning Inc. Canado, M.L.P. & Almagro Esteban, A. (2005). Authenticity in the teaching of ESP: An evaluation proposal. Scripta Manent 1(1), 35-43. Retrieved from http://www.sdutsj.edus.si/ScriptaManent/2005_1/Perez_Almagro.pdf Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heinemann Educational Books. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann. Cunningsworth, A., & Kusel, P. (1991). Evaluating teachers‟ guides. ELT Journal 45(2): 128-139. Daoud, A. M. & Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). Selecting and evaluating a textbook. In M. Celce-Murcia & L. McIntosh, eds. Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 302-307). New York: Newsbury House. Dougill, J. (1987). Not so obvious. In L. E. Shelden (ed.). ELT textbook and materials: Problems in evaluation and development. ELT documents 126. (pp. 29-36) Oxford: Modern English Publications in association with The British Council. Driss, L. (2006). Systematic textbooks supplementation (knowing when to supplement and what to add). US Department of State, Ministry of Education Morocco, University of Delaware, English Language Institute. Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/eli/2006P4L/driss.pdf Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Garinger, D. (2001). Textbook evaluation. TEFL Web Journal. Retrieved from http://www.teflwebj.org/v1n1/garinger.html Garinger, D. (2002). Textbook selection for the ESL classroom. Center for Applied Linguistics Digest. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/0210garinger.html Grant, N. (1987). Making the most of your textbook. London: Longman Inc. Griffiths, C. (1995). Evaluating materials for teaching English to adult speakers of other languages. Forum 33(3): 50. Retrieved from http://forum.state.gov/vols/vol33/no3/p50.htm Grote, R. D. (1996). The complete guide to performance appraisal. New York: AMACOM Books. Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow, Essex: Longman. Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman. Haycraft, J. (1978). An introduction to English language teaching. London: Longman. Hemsley, M. (1997). The evaluation of teachers‟ guides-design and application. ELTED 3(1): 72-83. Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Krug, K. (2002). Some points to ponder in textbook evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.kutztown.edu/library/materials/textbookeval.htm © 2011 The Clute Institute 25
6.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 26 Volume 4, Number 6 Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In B. Tomlinson (ed.) Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 190-216. Litz, D.R.A. (2005). Textbook Evaluation and ELT Management: A South Korean Case Study. Asian EFL Journal. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Litz_thesis.pdf Matthews, A. (1985). Choosing the best available textbook. In A. Matthews, M. Spratt, and L. Dangerfield (eds.). At the chalkface. (pp. 202-206). London: Edward Arnold. McColloy, W. & Remsted, R. (1965). Composition rating scale for general merit: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, LIX: 55-57. McDonough,J. & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. (2nd Ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23. Miekley, J. (2005). ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The Reading Matrix, 5(2). Retrieved from: http://www.readingmatrix.com/reading_projects/miekley/project.pdf Mukundan, J. & Ahour, T. (2010). A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (19702008). In Tomlinson, B., Masuhara, H. (Eds.). Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 336-352). London: Continuum. Peacock, M. (1997). Choosing the right book for your class. Retrieved from http://www.sx.ac.uk/linguistics/pgr/egspll/volume1/PDFs/PEACOCK1.pdf Rahimy, R. (2007). A coursebook evaluation. ESP World, 6, Issue 2(15). Retrieved from http://www.espworld.info/contents.htm Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roberts, J. T. (1996). Demystifying materials evaluation. System, 24(3): 375-389. Robinett, W. (1978). Teaching English to speakers of other languages: Substance and technique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Rubdy, R. (2003). Selection of materials. In B. Tomlinson. Developing materials for language teaching. (pp. 37-57). London: Continuum. Sager, C. (1972). Improving the quality of written composition through pupil use of rating scale. PhD Dissertation. Boston: Boston University. Sheldon, L. E. (1988) Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4):237-246. Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia. Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 432-453). (2nd Ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Tomlinson, B. (2003), Materials evaluation, in B. Tomlinson (ed.), Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum. Tucker, C. A. (1978). Evaluating beginning textbooks. In H. S. Madsen and J. D. Bowen. Adaptation in language teaching. Appendix 3 (pp. 219-237). Rowley, Mass: Newbury. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal 37(3): 251-255. Zabawa, J. (2001). Criteria for FCE textbook evaluation: an attempt at questionnaire formulation. Retrieved from: http://www.univ.rzeszow.pl/fil_ang/wsar2/sar_v2_17.pdf © 2011 The Clute Institute
7.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 Appendix A: A Tentative Checklist For Textbook Evaluation I. General attributes A. The book in relation to syllabus and curriculum 1. It matches to the specifications of the syllabus. B. Methodology 2. The activities can be exploited fully and can embrace the various methodologies in ELT. 3. Activities can work well with methodologies in ELT. C. Suitability to learners 4. It is compatible to the age of the learners. 5. It is compatible to the needs of the learners. 6. It is compatible to the interests of the learners. D. Physical and utilitarian attributes 7. Its layout is attractive. 8. It indicates efficient use of text and visuals. 9. It is durable. 10. It is cost-effective. E. Efficient outlay of supplementary materials 11. The book is supported efficiently by essentials like audio-materials. II. Learning-teaching content A. General 1. Most of the tasks in the book are interesting. 2. Tasks move from simple to complex. 3. Task objectives are achievable. 4. Cultural sensitivities have been considered. 5. The language in the textbook is natural and real. 6. The situations created in the dialogues sound natural and real. B. Listening 7. The book has appropriate listening tasks with well-defined goals. 8. Tasks are efficiently graded according to complexity. 9. Tasks are authentic or close to real language situations. C. Speaking 10. Activities are developed to initiate meaningful communication. 11. Activities are balanced between individual response, pair work and group work. D. Reading 12. Texts are graded. 13. Texts are interesting. E. Writing 14. Tasks have achievable goals and take into consideration learner capabilities. 15. Tasks are interesting. F. Vocabulary 16. The load (number of new words in each lesson) is appropriate to the level. 17. There is a good distribution (simple to complex) of vocabulary load across chapters and the whole book. 18. Words are efficiently repeated and recycled across the book. G. Grammar 19. The spread of grammar is achievable. 20. The grammar is contextualized. 21. Examples are interesting. 22. Grammar is introduced explicitly and reworked incidentally throughout the book. H. Pronunciation 23. It is contextualized. 24. It is learner-friendly with no complex charts. I. Exercises 25. They are learner friendly. 26. They are adequate. 27. They help students who are under/over-achievers. © 2011 The Clute Institute Volume 4, Number 6 27
8.
Contemporary Issues In
Education Research – June 2011 Volume 4, Number 6 NOTES 28 © 2011 The Clute Institute
Descargar ahora