Best Practices for Establishing an Effective Online Presence: A Panel Discussion for Academics
Overview: Join this expert panel session to learn best practices for establishing and maintaining an effective and engaging social media presence as a researcher and/or academic. Learn strategies for promoting your research, publications, conference talks and other efforts.
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this webinar, you will be able to:
Create a plan to establish a social media presence that is engaging and effective.
Identify the benefits of using multiple platforms to reach various audiences.
Plan an approach that allows you to use social media in a way that showcases your accomplishments and presents your work to the public, stakeholders, funders, and your peers.
Digital Scholar webinar: Establishing social media presence
1.
2. “Researchers are now actively
encouraged to utilize social media in
their research, with social media
engagement being increasingly
recognized by institutions as an
important evaluation criterion for
promotion and tenure” (Dol et al., 2019)
3.
4. Promote research engagement
Share findings
Engage the public on scientific topics
Identify collaborators
Locate training resources
Engage with the media
5.
6. • What are the benefits of social
media dissemination?
• Increased reach
• Increased collaboration
• Increased impact
7. SOCIAL MEDIA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGING
Katrine Wallace, PhD
University of Illinois at Chicago
School of Public Health
Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
8. OBJECTIVES
Describe my experience using social media to communicate
public health information during the pandemic
Share lessons learned and advice for academics who may
want to use social media for science communication
9. MY OWN SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
JOURNEY
Pre-2020
mostly classroom based
2020
Lots of urgency, changing policies
Volume of data hard for public to sort through
Debates that usually happened between scientists
behind closed doors were happening in public
Scientist vs Non-Scientists engaging
Politics, Opinions, Misinformation, “Alternative Facts”
My own journey started because of conspiracy theories
“Covid is a hoax”
10. SOCIAL MEDIA FOR SCIENCE
COMMUNICATION
• PROs:
• A way to communicate data and
information to many people
quickly & accurately
• Make connections with like
minded scientists
• CONS:
• Attention spans on social media
are short
• Algorithm-driven platforms
• Harassment
11. UNEXPECTED CHALLENGES – SOCIAL MEDIA
ALGORITHMS
• Engagement drives how often
you see specific content
• Someone with anti-science
engagement will be shown more
anti-science content
• Algorithm driven platforms are designed
to keep people on the app
• Favors sensational viral content
• Misinformation almost always wins over
evidence and data
12. UNEXPECTED CHALLENGES – SCIENCE
LITERACY
Science
communication in
2020 with non-
scientists had its
own host of
challenges
Public was
vulnerable for a
co-epidemic of
misinformation
13. MISINFORMATION DURING COVID-19
“Co-epidemic of misinformation” led to distrust of public health
recommendations and vaccine hesitancy
Misinformation about vaccines is causing people to question, delay
vaccination, costs lives, and is slowing recovery from the pandemic
Science communication builds trust with this group of people
Refuse all
vaccines
Vaccine
adopters
Vaccine hesitancy
14. SCIENCE COMMUNICATORS
Liaison between science literature and laypeople
make data accessible
Present a constantly changing data landscape
Synthesize data thoughtfully
Explain in bite size pieces
Building trust with people is most important!
15. BUILD TRUST BY LETTING PEOPLE
KNOW YOU!
Trust is essential for combatting misinformation and vaccine hesitancy
Important to show I’m a real person!
Roller
skating
Mom homeowner Hobbies and down time
16. BUILDING TRUST WITH
EVIDENCE
• Social media doesn’t have to mean
not scientific or not accurate
• Linktree with articles
• Provide evidence to back up what I
say
17. INCORPORATING SOCIAL MEDIA INTO
ACADEMIC COMMUNICATIONS
You won’t always be right
You will make public mistakes, and that is OK
Develop a thick skin, be prepared for trolls !
Troll comments mean you are doing good work!
Block and move on – blocking blatant misinformation is not censorship!
Make sure you are prepared to present the latest evidence and data
Interpreting the current evidence is valuable to laypeople. This is your “product”
Understand you won’t always go “viral”
the algorithms work against us
What we may lack in virality we can make up for with volume !!
Notas del editor
Social media is a tool that many of us use in our personal and professional lives. In the context of science and health, researchers report using social media to post content relating to their recent research, keep updated on advancements in their field, networking with existing colleagues, making connections to new colleagues, conduct research, disseminate information, interact with the public, and for academic promotion.
A scoping review conducted in 2019 aimed to explore how social media is used by health researchers professionally, as reported in the literature. The researchers analyzed over 400 articles from 31 countries. Main themes included using social media for participant recruitment, providing health information, and practical ways to use social media.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881779/
There are so many social media platforms in which researchers and academics can have a presence. You can communicate through images on platforms that are geared toward photosharing, such as Instagram, or you can engage in longform writing on blogs or websites like Medium.com. Youtube and podcasts also integrate the audiovisual elements that can be great for didactic purposes. In general, the recommendation for people who share information on social media is to keep things concise, layperson friendly, and specific. You want to establish yourself as a subject matter expert, which will keep people engaged and help them associate you with a specific body of work.
In addition to all of the ways listed here that social media can be an asset, it matters because researchers can influence the public on a large and democratic scale, and they can share accurate information/combatting mis- and disinformation.
In the consumer and e-commerce spaces, people’s trust in influencers grew 72% in the past year (2021). Although researchers are not selling a product in the traditional sense, we are promoting our personal brand and our program of research. We are stewards of our institutions. If we extrapolate this concept and apply it to researchers, we have the power to educate, empower and enrich the public trust in science, medicine, facts, and research.
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/walterloeb/2022/02/03/influencer-impact-on-consumers-increasing--facebook-has-less-power/#:~:text=The%20impact%20influencers%20can%20have,is%20very%20relevant%20to%20retailers.