Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
kalyong ES SBM
1. Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of South Cotabato
Polomolok East District
Polomolok, South Cotabto
KALYONG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
YEAR END REPORT IN SCHOOL BASE MANAGEMENT
l. INTRODUCTION
School-Based Management (SBM) places significant decision-
making power from the State and district offices to schools. An alternative
approach to improve the education system, it lets principals, teachers, students,
and parents decide on education-related issues like concerns on budget,
personnel, and the curriculum.
With this program, it provides opportunity to competent school
leaders in the schools to make decisions. Boosts the morale of teachers and
encourages leadership at all levels, allows participation of the entire school
community in making key decisions , has a wider pool of ideas in designing
education programs
focuses resources to the goals and needs of each school.
In line with the DepEd School Base Management Program (SBM) uplift the
standard of education and its services to the most important clients (children),
theschool is guided with different activities, projects and program.
To attain the success of all these activities, programs and projects, the
school initiates with the help of different stakeholders ;The School Head,
Teachers, PTA.,SGC,LGU, SPG, and Alumni.
ll. ACTIVITIES/ PROGRAMS/PROJECTS
Activities/Programs/Projects When Conducted Funds
Source of
Funds
1. GAD Orientation Sept. 25, 2014 Php300.00 PTA
2.VAWC Campaign
Nov. 25-Dec 12,
2014 Php1000.00 PTA
3.Child Rights Forum October 31, 2014
2. 4.Pamaskong Totoo Dec.19,2014 Php1000.00 PTA
5.School IP Day October 30, 2014
6.Classroom/ Fence
Repainting
October- March
2014 Php15,000.00
PGU,MOOE,
PTA
7.Gulayan s aPaaralan October 20, 2014 Php300.00 PTA
8.Early Enrollment Mapping Jan. 24,2015 Php500.00 Teachers
9.Adopt- a- Pupil
October 2014 -
March 2015 Teachers
10. School Feeding Program July – Dec. 2014 Php 10000.00 LGU, Gulayan
11. Career Guidance Jan. 7,2015
11.School Roll-out in MEPA Jan.30-31,2015 Php2460.00 MOOE
11. Thanksgiving Mass March 24, 2015 Php1000.00 Parents
12. Recognition Day March 25, 2015 Php1000.00 MOOE
13. Closing Exercises March 26, 2015 Php 1000.00
MOOE,
Parents
14.Cleanliness/Beautification
of School June-March 2015 Php 5000.00 MOOE, PTA
15. Academic Related
Activities in English, Science,
Filipino, MAKABAYAN and
other co-curricular activities
(BSP,GSP, Sports etc). June-March 2015 Php 15000.00 MOOE,PTA
lll. IMPACT OF THREE THEMATIC AREAS:
ACCESS:
ENROLMENT
252 249
198
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
3. Segmentation:
Presently, the enrolment of school year 2014-2015 has a great
decline compared to the data three years back. Here is the present data based
on the enrolment for two years.
Grade Level 2013-2014 2014-2015
Kinder 28 23
Grade One 24 29
Grade Two 33 25
Grade Three 30 30
Grade Four 33 27
Grade Five 47 30
Grade Six 48 32
Analysis:
Based on the present enrolment 2014-2015, there is a great
difference on the number of enrollees in the year 2013-2014. We can see a great
decline of enrolment from each grade level.
EFFICIENCY:
Promotion Rate
243 245
191
0
50
100
150
200
250
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
4. Segmentation:
21
23
27
29
23
25
3030
2727
3130
3232
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Kinder Gr. OneGr. Two Gr.
Three
Gr.Four Gr.Five Gr. Six
Promotion Rate
Enrolment rate
In this school year 2014-2015, when we based the promotion rate to
the enrolment we can say that the promotion rate is high because we only have 1
retained and zero drop out.
Analysis:
Based on the graph presented the Promotion rate of Kalyong
Elementary School is inconsistent. Some school year has a high promotion rate
like school year 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 it just decline in the year 2013-2014.
But presently (2014-2015) the promotion rate is high compared to the enrolment.
Drop-Out Rate
9
0 00
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2012-
2013
2013-
2014
2014-
2015
Number of DROP-
OUT
5. Segmentation:
Based on the graph presented. The Drop-Out rate were lowered
down from school year 2012-2013 from 9 drop-outs it lowered down to zero from,
2013-2014 up to present school year.
Analysis:
With the intervention and the strengthening of the DORP the drop-
out rate was maintained into zero.
GRADUATION RATE
48
46
32 32
0
10
20
30
40
50
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Enrolless
Graduated
Segmentation:
Based on the data presented there is an erratic data on the number
of pupils graduated compared to the number of pupils enrolled. But on the
present school year 2014-2015, the number of enrollees is the same with the
number of graduates which means that there are no drop-outs, retained and
transferred-out pupils.
Analysis:
The graduation rate of Kalyong ES was not maintained based on the
number of enrollees who were enrolled. There are some factors why the
graduation rate is low based on the enrolment like pupils were retained and
transferred out.
6. QUALITY:
NAT GR. III & VI
68.23
51.46
42.93
39.56
55.56
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
NAT Gr. III
NAT Gr. VI
Segmentation:
Based on the data presented, the National Achievement Test of Gr.
III and Gr. VI really declined.
Analysis:
Since the school did not reach the National standard which is 75%,
the teachers made some actions to increased the NAT result. During school year
2012-2013 KES got the lowest NAT result in Gr. VI for the past three years. On
school year 2013-2014 it increased up to 16% but still it did not reach the
National Standard.
IV.ACCESS ( ENROLMENT)
A. HINDERING FACTORS
• Opening of complete Elementary School from nearby school
specifically the Bukayeel ES.
B. FACILITATING FACTORS
• Identify the reasons of the decreased number of enrollees
7. • Facilitate preventive measures to sustain or even increase the
number of enrolment.
EFFICIENCY ( PROMOTION RATE)
A. HINDERING FACTORS
• Low income status of parents.
• Transfer of residence before the Fourth Grading Period.
B. FACILITATING FACTORS
• Home visitation of the PARDOs.
• Remedial classes extended by the teachers.
• Extend preventive measures of dropping or failing pupils.
DROP-OUT
A. HINDERING FACTORS
• Absenteeism
• Transfer of residence
• Early Marriage
• No permanent employment of parents
• Child labor
B. FACILITATING FACTORS
• Home Visitation of the PARDOs
• Teacher-parent conference
• Communication to the parents
• Tap Linkages
8. GRADUATION RATE
A. HINDERING FACTORS
• Early Marriage
• No permanent employment of parents
• Child labor
• Absenteeism
B. FACILITATING FACTORS
• Home Visitation
• Teacher-Parent Conference
QUALITY (NAT)
A. HINDERING FACTORS
• Teachers overloaded activities that they tend not to focus on the
academic performance of pupils.
• Lack of Review materials
• Lack of interest of pupils
• Absenteeism of pupils
B. FACILITATING FACTORS
• Identify the reasons of the decreased rate of NAT
• Facilitate preventive measures to increase the rate of NAT
• Conducted diagnostic test to the pupils to identify the skills to be
reviewed and focus to
V. INTERVENTIONS
ACCESS ( ENROLMENT)
• Conducted an early registration and community mapping to all the nearby
in the community.
9. • Went to the Day Care centers and got the list of incoming Kinder pupils.
• Tap LGUs and Purok officers to map the out-of school youth and drop-out
pupils.
EFFICIENCY (PROMOTION RATE, DROP-OUT RATE, GRADUATION RATE)
• Conducted Home Visitation
• Strengthen the DORP program
• Had a monthly Teachers-parents conference
• Wrote communication letters to parents with children who has problem in
school like absenteeism, tardiness and failure to pass school
requirements.
• Tap stakeholders to strengthen the school-community relationship
QUALITY (NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST)
• Conducted a diagnostic test to measures and know the skills that need to
be enhanced and reviewed by the teachers.
• Identify pupils to different limits.
• Made an action plan to let teachers know on what are the thing that needs
to be reviewed by them.
• Teachers adapt the “Adopt a Pupil Program”. Since there are only 32
grade six pupils each teacher had 3 pupils to be adopt and focused in their
NAT reviews.
• Scheduled NAT reviews are conducted.
VI. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
To achieve DepEd mission and vision with the help of the School
Based-Management. The school aims to attain successfully the different
programs implemented by the DepEd to improve the academic performance of
the pupils and of course to serve better our community. Here are the plans of the
school to improve our SBM programs:
• Increase our performance through the help of the school and our
stakeholders. (ACCESS, EFFICIENCY & QUALITY).
10. • To improve our SBM we will have a bench-marking in different schools
who have gone high level in their SBM.
• To accumulate funds, we will have an income-generating program to help
sustain our needs in school.
• Tap linkages like NGOs, LGUs to sponsor different programs to be
conducted in our school.
VII. TARGETS/FUTURE PLANS
All children and young people of the world, with their individual
strengths and weaknesses, with their hopes and expectations, have the right to
education. It is not our education systems that have a right to certain types of
children. Therefore, it is the school system of a country that must be adjusted to
meet the needs of all children (UNESCO, 2003)
With this SBM program. The school will be able to develop a deep
relationship to its stakeholders. The following are the targets of the school in the
next school years:
• Bench-Marking on the schools with exemplary SBM practices.
• Strengthen the SBM practices of the school by putting committees on the
different events.
• Implement SMEPA for proper conduction and evaluation on each program
implemented in the school.
• Tap the LGUs and NGOs and all possible stakeholders in the community
for the improvement of the school facilities.