1. Sri Lanka:
One Island, Two Nations
Presentation for:
Tamil Americans and Friends (TAaF)
1

2. Srilanka-Ilankai (in Tamil) / Lanka (in Sinhala)
• An island located in the
Indian ocean, off the
southeast tip of India
• Three times as larger than
the state of New Jersey -
25,000 sq miles in area
• Shared History Dates Back to
500BC.
• Sinhala-speaking people - 77%,
• Tamil-speaking people - 23%
2

3. History
• When Portuguese took
possession of the
island in 1505 there
were 3 Kingdoms
• Tamil Kingdom in the
North-East - Tamil
Homeland - (yellow)
• Sinhalese Kingdoms in
the South-West (grey).
3

4. History
The Cleghorn Minute
In 1799 June, Sir Hugh Cleghorn, the first British Colonial
Secretary wrote to the British Government…
“
Two different nations from a very ancient period have
divided between them the possession of the Island.
First the Sinhalese, inhabiting the interior of the
country in its Southern and Western parts, and
secondly the Malabars (Tamils) who possess the
Northern and Eastern Districts. These two nations
differ entirely in their religion, language and manners.
4
”

5. History
• 1505 -1658: Portuguese held the island
• 1658 – 1796: Dutch usurped control
• 1796: the British took over
• Portuguese and Dutch ruled the Tamil and Sinhala
Kingdoms separately, but, the British artificially joined them
for their administrative convenience only in 1833.
• On Feb. 4, 1948 - British left the Island leaving it as one
country, CEYLON, leaving political power in the hands of the
‘majority’ Sinhalese.
5

6. 6

7. THE PROBLEM
Three Fundamental Elements
7

8. THE PROBLEM: First Element
1. Two Historically Feuding Ethnic Groups
•Tamils in the North-East
(Yellow)
•Sinhalese in the Central
and South-West (Gray)
8

9. THE PROBLEM: Second Element
1. Two Historically Feuding Ethnic Groups.
2. Centralized Unitary Government.
Citizens are not treated equally…
…Rights of the Tamils are violated
‘Mistreatment’ of Tamils – 60 years!
9

10. THE PROBLEM: Third Element
1. Two Historically Feuding Ethnic Groups.
2. Centralized Unitary Government.
3. Constitutionally entrenched Sinhala
Rule.
SINHALESE COMMAND
ABSOLUTE POWER
…and, it is PERMANENT!
10

11. THE PROBLEM: ‘Mistreatment’ of Tamils
• 1948 – 1 million Tamils declared as non-citizens
• 1949 – Sinhalese colonization in traditional Tamil homeland
• 1956 – Sinhala made sole official language of the country
• 1970 – “ethnic standardization” slashes university admission to Tamils
– same entrance exam, but Tamils need to score 30% more
• 1972 – New constitution without Tamils participation
– Unilateral name change from Ceylon to Sri Lanka
– Declaration of Srilanka as a republic
– Buddhism made state religion
• 1977 - Prevention of Terrorism Act
• State-sponsored anti-Tamil violence in 1956, 1958, 1961, 1974
11

12. TAMIL POLITICAL ACTION
Tamils Response to State Discrimination:
NON-VIOLENCE
(1948 – 1976)
12

13. TAMIL POLITICAL ACTION
NON-VIOLENCE
Tamil Political Leaders protested against the “Sinhala only Act”,
in front of the parliament (5 June 1956)
Sinhalese assaulted the picketers and the attack spread the whole island.
13

14. TAMIL POLITICAL ACTION
NON-VIOLENCE
School Girls Marching against ethnic based standardization (1972)
14

15. TAMIL POLITICAL ACTION: NON-VIOLENCE
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
VIOLENCE
(Since 1956)
1. State Organized Sinhala Thugs:
• Repeated Anti-Tamil Pogroms: Ethnic cleansing
2. Government Security Forces:
• killing Tamils with impunity99% of the Armed Forces are Sinhalese
15

16. Systematic Genocide of Tamils
1956.. 1958.. 1961.. 1974.. 1977.. 1979.. 1981.. 1983.. .. 2008
Anti-Tamil Pogrom
1983
Government sponsored
Sinhala Thugs tortured a Tamil
Man, then poured gasoline on
him and burnt him alive
(July 1983)
16

17. TAMIL POLITICAL ACTION: NON-VIOLENCE
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: VIOLENCE
TURNING POINT - 1976
17

18. TURNING POINT - 1976
• Resolution for Independence: Vaddukoddai Resolution
– 30 year struggle for equality denied.
– multiple pacts for regional autonomy not honored.
– non-violent agitations by Tamils met by State violence
– The Elected Tamil Political Leaders convened and resolved to restore
Tamil Sovereignty by declaring an Independent Tamil state in the
North-East of Sri Lanka.
– 1977 Election: Tamils ratify the call for independence by 82% popular
vote
• Tamil Legislators thrown out of parliament by the government.
• Tamil Armed Rebellion takes hold
Lead by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
• 1983 – State Sponsored Anti-Tamil Pogrom
18

19. Thimpu Talks Declaration – July 13th 1985
Mediated by Indian government failed
Statement by the Tamil Delegation (Elected and Rebel)
“ Any meaningful solution to the Tamil national question must be
based on the following four cardinal principles:
•Recognition of Tamils as a Distinct Nation.
•Recognition of the Tamil Homeland and its Territorial Integrity.
•Recognition of the right of Tamil National Self-Determination.
”
•Recognition of the Right to Citizenship of all Tamils.
19

20. 1983 - 2002
– Entire Tamil Nation rallied behind LTTE and carry out
armed struggle for independence.
– 75,000 civilians died: 97% of them were Tamils, killed by
the Sri Lankan armed forces.
– Tamils sacrifice 18,000 youths to achieve parity of status
with Sri Lanka.
– LTTE becomes a formidable Tamil military force and the
sole-representatives of the Tamil people, gains control of
significant areas of the North- East, and establishes civil
administration services.
20

21. TAMIL NATIONAL MILITARY
(LTTE)
Today, a Conventional Tamil Armed Force.
(Ground Forces, Naval Force, Air Force, Police, Intelligence Service)
21

22. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
2002
Ceasefire
Monitored by Scandinavian Countries
(Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission - SLMM)
Direct Dialogue
Facilitated By the Royal Norwegian Government
22

23. CEASEFIRE AGREEMENT
Signed by the SL Government and the LTTE on 22 February 2002
“
…forward defence localities (borders)
have been established, the Sri
Lankan armed forces and the
Liberation Tigers’ fighting
formations shall hold their ground
positions…
…Neither Party shall engage in any
offensive military operation nor
shall move munitions, explosives
or military equipment into the area LTTE Northern Com. Col. Theepan &
controlled by the other Party. SL Northern Com. Maj. Gen. Fonseka
”
[at the northern FDL February 2002]
23

24. THE OSLO DECLARATION:
Signed by the SLG and the LTTE on 25 November 2002
In the presence of US Deputy Sec. of State Mr. Richard Armitage ,
Norwegian Foreign Minister Mr. Jan Petersen, UK Sec. of State Ms. Claire short, Japan Special
“
Envoy Mr.Yasusi Akashi
…the parties have agreed to
explore a political solution
founded on the principle of
internal self-determination in
areas of historical habitation
of the Tamil-speaking
people, based on a federal
structure within a united Sri
LTTE’s Dr. Anton Balasingham,
Lanka.
”
SLG’s Prof. G.L.eiris,
at the Oslo Conference, 25 November
24

25. BROKEN AGREEMENTS
Within 3 years… 2002-2005
1. Dissolving High Security Zones – Withdrawing military
from Houses, School, Worshiping places (February 2002)
2. Sub-Committee for Immediate Humanitarian and
Rehabilitation Needs in the North and East (SIHRN)
(February 2002)
3. North East Reconstruction Fund (NERF) (November 2002)
4. Interim Self Governing Authority (ISGA) (31 October 2003)
5. Post Tsunami Operational Management Structure
(PTOMS) (June 2005)
25

26. November 2005
Election of President Rajapakse
Campaign promises:
• No recognition of Tamil Homeland or right to Self-Rule.
• No to Federal Solution
• No to International Mediation
Rajapaksa was elected as President by the
Majority of Sinhala people.
26

27. November 2005
Election of President Rajapakse
Supported by Extremist Buddhist Monks Party (JHU),
view Srilanka as a Sinhala-Buddhist nation, Burning Norway Flag
Associated Press Photo27
November 2005

28. After the Election of President Rajapakse
ESCALATION OF VIOLENCE
by the SL Armed Forces and Government sponsored Paramilitary.
• 47 humanitarian workers were kidnapped and killed.
• 5 Tamil Parliamentarians were assassinated.
• Many leading Tamil Journalists were murdered.
• Hundreds of Tamils were abducted for ransom & killed.
• 17 Humanitarian Workers of a French NGO (AFC)
Murdered by SL Army in an execution style on 5 August 2006
Chief of the Ceasefire Monitoring mission
Maj. Gen. Ulf Henricsson told:
"I have experienced this in the Balkans before. When you're not let
in, it's a sign that there's something they want to hide".
[ Reuters; 12 Aug 2006] 28

29. Violence after Election of President Rajapakse
Targeted Killing of Tamil Civilians
Mother raped and killed. Children brutalized and Hanged.
Father forced to see all these, and shot dead. (Venkalai, 9 June 2006)
29

30. Violence after Election of President Rajapakse
Targeted Killing of Tamil Civilians
• Sri Lankan jets
bombed a
children's home in
Mullaithivu
• 67 schoolgirls
and 7 teachers
were killed
• 129 were
wounded when
(14 August 2006)
A Government minister acknowledged it, and argued,
“There is nothing wrong in killing future child soldiers”.
30

31. After Election of President Rajapakse:
Current Situation
 SL government de-merged the Tamil Homeland. (North-East)
 Sri Lanka government officially unilaterally abrogated Ceasefire
Agreement from January 16, 2008
 Sri Lanka government is intensifying a full scale war on the Tamil
Homeland to impose Military Solution & calling it as “War on Terror”
 No credible political solution is under discussion by SL government.
 Tamil civilians being targeted: Disappearances, Daily aerial bombings,
Road-side bombs, Shelling, Extra-judicial killing.
 Over 5000 Tamils have been killed since election .
 Average of 7 Tamils killed daily
31

32. US Foreign Policy & Role
Toward Sri Lanka and Tamils
32

33. US Policy & Role
• In 1996 Sri Lanka influenced US to designate LTTE as FTO.
• In the post 9/11 scenario US sort partners for War on Terror.
• SL depicted the Tamil armed struggle as acts of Terrorism.
• SL declared its human rights violations as inevitable occurrences in the
War on Terror.
• US promotes democracy and freedom, and acknowledges Tamils’
legitimate aspirations for freedom.
• In 2004 elections, the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) accepted the LTTE
as the National Leadership of the Tamils, and won 97% of Tamils’ votes.
• However, since LTTE is in its FTO list, US is in a paradox that it is
unable to treat both parties equally and help Tamils achieve their
legitimate aspirations for freedom.
33

34. The USA had placed LTTE on the FTO list
R. Nicholas Burns,
Under Secretary for Political Affairs,
(Colombo, Sri Lanka - January 23, 2006)
“ We brand LTTE as terrorist organization for using violence as
a ‘political weapon’. But the Tamil population has legitimate
grievances, and they must be respected by the majority
population, and there has to be a way for the Tamils to be
able to articulate those grievances.
I must say that this long conflict is only going to come to an
end when the LTTE and the government sit down and find a
”
way forward to end this conflict.
34

35. US ROLE
1. Military Assistance to SL Army
• Stop It
2. Financial Aid to SL Government
• Monitor it
3. Public Statements
• Be fair to both nation
4. ‘Diplomacy’
• Treat both parties Equally
35

36. US CONGRESS
Rep. Frank Pallone – On Autonomy of Tamils:
• “I echo this sentiment and support a solution that grants a level of autonomy to
ethnic minorities like the Tamils. We have seen very similar successful
situations throughout the world. Places like Quebec in Canada, Wales and
Scotland in Great Britain are all part of their Federal Nations but have
significant autonomy. “ (September 2006)
Rep. Rush Holt – On Human Rights Violations Against Tamils
• “I urge US Secretary of State Dr. Rice to appoint a special envoy to emphasize
US's commitment to peace in Sri Lanka and to include in the envoy's
mandate efforts to increase monitoring of human rights violations," (September
2006)
36

37. US GOVERNMENT
Mr. Richard Boucher
Assistant US Secretary of State
[Colombo; 26 June 2006]
“ Though we reject the methods that the Tamil Tigers
have used, there are legitimate issues raised by the
Tamil community and they have a very legitimate
desire, as anybody would, to control their own lives,
to rule their own destinies, and to govern themselves
”
in their homeland, in the areas they’ve traditionally
inhabited. -
37

38. US GOVERNMENT
Richard L. Armitage
Deputy Secretary of State
[December, 2002
“
… the United States is greatly encouraged that the LTTE has
made a commitment to the political solution and has agreed to
settle this conflict through peaceful means...
… the United States government is also encouraged by the vision
of the LTTE as a genuine political entity. If the LTTE can make a
convincing case that it is committed to a political solution, the
United States will certainly consider removing the LTTE from the
list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, as well as any other
terrorism-related...
”
… A US – LTTE direct contact is worth Trying.
38

39. EU followed US and placed LTTE on the FTO list
Maj. Gen. Ulf Henricsson
Chief of the Ceasefire Monitoring Mission.
[ Reuters; 12 Aug 2006]
“ EU can't say they didn't know or at least have any signal about
what could happen, I think the EU thought that the government
of Sri Lanka was a responsible government, who could take the
appropriate decision and work for peace instead of war...
…I would say, EU’s decision to ban the LTTE is a mistake, it
was a wrong decision, because the LTTE and the government
”
have signed the ceasefire agreement as equal partners.”
39

40. US DIPLOMAT
Teresita C. Schaffer
Former US Ambassador to Sri Lanka
(June 2005)
“ The United States’ designation of the LTTE a
‘Foreign Terrorist Organization’ has affected U.S.
diplomacy in Sri Lanka…
…The effect of U.S. terrorism law and of the
terrorist organization list has been a problem for
U.S. diplomacy, and one that has not always been
”
wisely handled.”
40

41. US CONGRESS
Rep. Brad Sherman
March 15, 2006
“
I’ve urged the State Department to design a road
map for the Tamil Tigers, so that they would know
what steps they would need to take to get off the
terrorist list…
…What is the difference between terrorism on the
one hand, and waging a legitimate guerrilla struggle
on the other?..
Seeking some degree of autonomy for North-East
”
Sri Lanka is not a terrible objective.
41

42. US DIPLOMAT
Jeffrey Lunstead
Former US Ambassador to Sri Lanka
[May 2007]
“ …Direct US-LTTE links would have helped in
convincing the LTTE to move away from terrorism…
… direct communication with the LTTE would have
had concrete benefits including the ability to deliver a
clear U.S. message about possible delisting of the
”
LTTE as an FTO (Foreign Terrorist Organization)
42

43. 60 Years... The result:
• More than 100,000 Tamils Killed and Disappeared
• More than 20,000 Tamil orphaned children
• More than 35,000 Tamil widows
• Hundreds of Thousands of schools, houses, hospitals, churches,
temples, villages and livelihood destroyed.
• More than 600,000 Tamils Internal Refugees
• Nearly 1 Million Tamils made to flee the country
If this is not ETHNIC CLEANSING, then what is?
Fighting for Survival is NOT Terrorism…
43

44. • Two Ethnic Nations, separated by
– History, Language, Culture, Economic Life, Territorial Homeland.
• A Tamil Conventional Military fighting the Sri Lankan Military.
– Defense against genocide of Tamils
• A large enough Tamil Territory
– Defensible and sustainable for self governance
– Roughly the same size as Israel or Kuwait or Slovenia.
– Bigger in area (19,509 sq. km.) than at least 41 countries in the UN
(including Singapore)
• A De facto Tamil Government
– Police, Judicial, Finance, Economic-Developments,etc, …in existence.
– Bigger in population (3.6 million – in 1979 - ) than at least 59 countries
in the UN
A Struggle for Freedom – NOT Terrorism
44

45. The Future…
If the Sri Lanka government does not accept Tamil Homeland,
Tamil Nationhood and Tamil self-rule, the basic and cardinal
principles, that have been guiding the Tamils in their struggle
to find a peacefully-negotiated political arrangement…and…
If the Sri Lankan government not willing to share power with the
Tamils under a Con-Federal system or some form of a two-
state solution…
Tamils will be forced to continue their struggle for their
National Self-Determination and a Separate State.
45

46. Kosovo & Tamil Eelam
What is good for Kosovo is good for Tamil Eelam
46

47. What the Tamil Americans expect from the
Government of the United States:
 Play a leadership role to find a political solution
to the legitimate aspirations of the Tamil People.
 Remove the LTTE from the Foreign Terrorist
Organizations list, and Treat both parties equally.
 Recognize the Tamil National Self Determination.
 Permit Tamil people to choose their destiny in
internationally supervised plebiscite.
 Facilitate the birth of the Tamil Nation, Tamil Eelam
47

48. 48