SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 42
Spine Imaging
By
Dr.P.Shyam Sunder Reddy
Spine Radiography
• Cervical Spine
• Thoracolumber Spine
Cervical Spine Radiography
• Clinical considerations are particularly important
because
– normal C-spine X-rays cannot exclude significant injury
– a missed C-spine fracture can lead to death
– life long neurological deficit.
• Clinico-radiological assessment of spinal injuries
should be managed by experienced clinicians .
• Imaging should not delay resuscitation.
Cervical Spine Radiography
• CT or MRI is often appropriate in the context
of a
– high risk injury,
– neurological deficit,
– limited clinical examination, or
– where there are unclear X-ray findings.
Cervical Spine Radiograph
Standard View:
– Anteroposterior view
– Lateral View
– Odontoid (Open Mouth View)
Extended View
– Swimmers View: when lateral radiograph fails to
show vertebrae down to T1
Cervical Spine Systemic Approach
• Coverage - Adequate?
• Alignment - Anterior/Posterior/Spinolaminar
• Bones - Cortical outline/Vertebral body height
• Spacing - Discs/Spinous processes
• Soft tissues - Prevertebral
• Edge of image
Coverage - All vertebrae are visible from the skull base to the top of
T1 (T1 is considered adequate)
If T1 is not visible 'swimmer's' view
Alignment - Check the Anterior line (the line of the anterior
longitudinal ligament), the Posterior line (the line of the
posterior longitudinal ligament), and the Spinolaminar line
(the line formed by the anterior edge of the spinous
processes - extends from inner edge of skull).
Bone - Trace the cortical outline
Note: The spinal cord (not visible) lies between the posterior and
spinolaminar lines
Cervical Spine Systemic Approach
Cervical Spine Systemic Approach
• Disc spaces - The vertebral bodies are spaced apart by the
intervertebral discs - not directly visible with X-rays. These spaces
should be approximately equal in height
• Prevertebral soft tissue - Some fractures cause widening of
the prevertebral soft tissue due to prevertebral haematoma
• - Normal prevertebral soft tissue (asterisks) - narrow
down to C4 and wider below
- Above C4 ≤ 1/3rd vertebral body width
- Below C4 ≤ 100% vertebral body width
• Note: Not all C-spine fractures are accompanied by prevertebral
hematoma - lack of prevertebral soft tissue thickening should NOT be
taken as reassuring
• Edge of image - Check other visible structures
Cervical Spine Systemic Approach
Cervical Spine Systemic Approach
• Bone - The cortical outline is not always well
defined but forcing your eye around the edge of all
the bones will help you identify fractures
• C2 Bone Ring - At C2 (Axis) the lateral masses
viewed side on form a ring of corticated bone (red
ring )
• This ring is not complete in all subjects and may
appear as a double ring
• A fracture is sometimes seen as a step in the ring
outline
Cervical Spine Systemic Approach
C-spine systematic approach - Normal AP
• Coverage - The AP view should cover the whole C-spine
and the upper thoracic spine
• Alignment - The lateral edges of the C-spine should be
• aligned
• Bone - Fractures are often less clearly visible on this
view than on the lateral
• Spacing - The spinous processes are in a straight line
and spaced approximately evenly
• Soft tissues - Check for surgical emphysema
• Edges of image - Check for injury to the upper ribs and
the lung apices for pneumothorax
C-spine systematic approach - Normal AP
C-spine normal anatomy - Open mouth view
• This view is considered adequate if it shows the
alignment of the lateral processes of C1 and C2
• The distance between the peg and the lateral masses
of C1 should be equal on each side
• Note: In this image the odontoid peg is fully visible
which is not often achievable in the context of
trauma due to difficulty in patient positioning
• The distance between the peg and the lateral processes is not
equal - compare A (right) with B (left)
• This is because when the image was acquired the patient's
head was rotated to one side
• Alignment of the lateral processes can still be assessed and is
seen to be normal
Swimmer's' view
• This is an oblique view which projects the humeral heads away
from the C-spine. A swimmer's view may be useful in assessing
alignment at the cervico-thoracic junction if C7/T1 has not
been adequately viewed on the lateral image, or on a
repeated lateral image with the shoulders lowered.
• The view is difficult to achieve, and often difficult to interpret.
If plain X-ray imaging of the cervico-thoracic junction is limited
then CT may be required.
Swimmers View
Thoracolumber spine
• In the context of trauma similar principles
apply to imaging both the Thoracic spine (T-
spine) and the Lumbar spine (L-spine).
Thoracolumber spine
• Use a systematic approach
• Correlate radiological findings with the clinical features
• If 'instability' is suspected then further imaging with CT should
be considered
• If you see one fracture - check for another
Thoracic spine - Standard views
• AP and Lateral - Assess both views
systematically .
• Images of the thoracic and lumbar spine are
often large and the bones should be
scrutinized in detail
• Note: The upper T-spine may not be visible on
the lateral view - if injury is suspected here
then a swimmer's view may be helpful
Thoracolumbar spine - Systematic approach
• Coverage - Adequate?
• Alignment - Anterior/Posterior/Lateral
• Bones - Cortical outline/Vertebral body height
• Spacing - Discs/Spinous processes/Pedicles
• Soft tissues - Paravertebral
• Edge of image
Thoracolumbar spine - Systematic approach
• Lateral and AP
• Coverage - The whole spine is visible on both views
• Alignment - Follow the corners of the vertebral bodies from one
level to the next
• Bones - The vertebral bodies should gradually increase in size
from top to bottom
Thoracolumbar spine - Systematic approach
• Spacing - Disc spaces gradually increase from
superior to inferior - Note: Due to magnification
and spine curvature the vertebral bodies and discs
at the edges of the image can appear larger than
those in the centre of the image
• Soft tissues - Check the paravertebral line (see AP
image below)
• Edge of image - Check the other structures visible
Thoracic spine - Systematic approach
• Alignment - Vertebral body alignment is
assessed by carefully matching the anterior
and posterior corners of the vertebral bodies
with the adjacent vertebra
• Bones - Gradual increase in vertebral body
height from superior to inferior
• Spacing - Disc spaces gradually increase in
height from superior to inferior
VB = Vertebral body
P = Pedicle
SP = Spinous process (ribs overlying)
F = Spinal nerve exit foramen
Thoracic spine - Systematic approach
• Alignment - The vertebral bodies and spinous processes
(SP) are aligned
• Bones - The vertebral bodies and pedicles are intact
• Other visible bony structures include the transverse
processes (TP), ribs, and the costovertebral and
costotransverse joints
• Spacing - Each disc space is of equal height when
comparing left with right. The pedicles gradually become
wider apart from superior to inferior
• Soft tissue - Note the normal paravertebral soft tissue
which forms a straight line on the left - distinct from the
aorta
Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach
• Coverage - The whole L-spine should be visible on
both views
• Alignment - Follow the corners of the vertebral
bodies from one level to the next (dotted lines)
• Bones - Follow the cortical outline of each bone
• Spacing - Disc spaces gradually increase in height
from superior to inferior - Note: The L5/S1 space is
normally slightly narrower than L4/L5
Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach
• Check the cortical outline of each vertebra
• The facet joints comprise the inferior and
superior articular processes of each adjacent
level
• The pars interarticularis literally means 'part
between the joints'
• P = Pedicle
• SP = Spinous process
Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach
Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach
• Alignment - The vertebral bodies and spinous
processes are aligned
• Bones - The vertebral bodies and pedicles are intact
• Spacing - Gradually increasing disc height from
superior to inferior. The pedicles gradually become
wider apart from superior to inferior - Note: The
lower discs are angled away from the viewer and so
are less easily assessed on this view
Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach
• Check carefully for pedicle integrity and
transverse process fractures
Three column model
• The Clinico-radiological assessment of thoracolumbar
spine stability is usually performed by spinal surgeons
with the help of radiologists.
• A simple model commonly used for assessment of
spinal stability is the 'three column' model. This states
that if any 2 columns are injured then the injury is
'unstable'. This theory is an over simplification if
applied to plain X-rays alone. It is important to be
aware that some injuries are not visible on X-ray and
that 2 and 3 column injuries may be underestimated as
1 or 2 column injuries respectively.
• If spinal instability is suspected on the basis of clinical
or radiological grounds then further imaging with CT
should be considered.
Three column model - Anatomy
• Anterior column = Anterior half of the
vertebral bodies and soft tissues
• Middle column = Posterior half of the
vertebral bodies and soft tissues
• Posterior column = Posterior elements and
soft soft tissues
• Three column model - Fracture simulation
• Injuries 1 and 2 affect one column only and are considered 'stable'
• 1 - Spinous process injury
• 2 - Anterior compression injury
• Injuries 3 and 4 affect two or more columns and are considered 'unstable'
• 3 - 'Burst' fracture
• 4 - Flexion-distraction fracture - 'Chance' type injury
Three column model - Fracture simulation
Thank You

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a DOC-20230223-WA0019. copy.pptx

Presentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spine
Presentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spinePresentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spine
Presentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spine
Yashawant Yadav
 

Similar a DOC-20230223-WA0019. copy.pptx (20)

Spine anatomy (basic spine 2009)
Spine anatomy (basic spine 2009)Spine anatomy (basic spine 2009)
Spine anatomy (basic spine 2009)
 
Scoliosis BY DR. D. P. SWAMI
Scoliosis BY DR. D. P. SWAMI Scoliosis BY DR. D. P. SWAMI
Scoliosis BY DR. D. P. SWAMI
 
‫Spinal injury
‫Spinal injury   ‫Spinal injury
‫Spinal injury
 
X ray c-spine
X ray c-spine X ray c-spine
X ray c-spine
 
Radiographic anatomy and views of c spine
Radiographic anatomy and views of c spineRadiographic anatomy and views of c spine
Radiographic anatomy and views of c spine
 
Scoliosis
ScoliosisScoliosis
Scoliosis
 
Radiographic lines and angles
Radiographic lines and anglesRadiographic lines and angles
Radiographic lines and angles
 
Foto polos cervical - Irfani Ryan.pptx
Foto polos cervical - Irfani Ryan.pptxFoto polos cervical - Irfani Ryan.pptx
Foto polos cervical - Irfani Ryan.pptx
 
Scoliosis
Scoliosis Scoliosis
Scoliosis
 
X Ray and MRI of Knee Joint
X Ray and MRI of Knee JointX Ray and MRI of Knee Joint
X Ray and MRI of Knee Joint
 
Spinal injury gihs
Spinal injury   gihsSpinal injury   gihs
Spinal injury gihs
 
Dr Harshil radio spine
Dr Harshil radio spineDr Harshil radio spine
Dr Harshil radio spine
 
Adult hip dysplasia
Adult hip dysplasiaAdult hip dysplasia
Adult hip dysplasia
 
Scoliosis
ScoliosisScoliosis
Scoliosis
 
Radiography clinical updates - session one
Radiography clinical updates - session one Radiography clinical updates - session one
Radiography clinical updates - session one
 
Scoliosis
ScoliosisScoliosis
Scoliosis
 
Applied cross sectional anatomy of spinal cord
Applied cross sectional anatomy of spinal cordApplied cross sectional anatomy of spinal cord
Applied cross sectional anatomy of spinal cord
 
Cervical spine injuries
Cervical spine injuries Cervical spine injuries
Cervical spine injuries
 
Cervical Spine Deformity 2019
Cervical Spine Deformity 2019Cervical Spine Deformity 2019
Cervical Spine Deformity 2019
 
Presentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spine
Presentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spinePresentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spine
Presentation1.pptx thoraccic and lumber spine
 

Más de shyam sunder (16)

Lat ven
Lat venLat ven
Lat ven
 
Clinicoradiological And Pathological Correlation Of Autopsy Study In.pptx
Clinicoradiological And Pathological Correlation Of Autopsy Study In.pptxClinicoradiological And Pathological Correlation Of Autopsy Study In.pptx
Clinicoradiological And Pathological Correlation Of Autopsy Study In.pptx
 
cns-antiepileptics-190304062504.pptx
cns-antiepileptics-190304062504.pptxcns-antiepileptics-190304062504.pptx
cns-antiepileptics-190304062504.pptx
 
Brainstemppt
BrainstempptBrainstemppt
Brainstemppt
 
meningitis FINAL.pptx
meningitis FINAL.pptxmeningitis FINAL.pptx
meningitis FINAL.pptx
 
meningitis FINAL 2.pptx
meningitis FINAL 2.pptxmeningitis FINAL 2.pptx
meningitis FINAL 2.pptx
 
Awareness-Presentation-Schools.pptx
Awareness-Presentation-Schools.pptxAwareness-Presentation-Schools.pptx
Awareness-Presentation-Schools.pptx
 
PAROTID SWELLING ps.pptx
PAROTID SWELLING ps.pptxPAROTID SWELLING ps.pptx
PAROTID SWELLING ps.pptx
 
PSSR BURNS (1).pptx
PSSR BURNS (1).pptxPSSR BURNS (1).pptx
PSSR BURNS (1).pptx
 
brachial plexus final.pptx
brachial plexus final.pptxbrachial plexus final.pptx
brachial plexus final.pptx
 
KOTHAGUDEM-KPI.pptx
KOTHAGUDEM-KPI.pptxKOTHAGUDEM-KPI.pptx
KOTHAGUDEM-KPI.pptx
 
Presentation (5).pptx
Presentation (5).pptxPresentation (5).pptx
Presentation (5).pptx
 
cavernou sinus anatomy.pptx
cavernou sinus anatomy.pptxcavernou sinus anatomy.pptx
cavernou sinus anatomy.pptx
 
cavernoussinus-130717084241-phpapp01.pdf
cavernoussinus-130717084241-phpapp01.pdfcavernoussinus-130717084241-phpapp01.pdf
cavernoussinus-130717084241-phpapp01.pdf
 
1-Radiological anatomy of spine.ppt
1-Radiological anatomy of spine.ppt1-Radiological anatomy of spine.ppt
1-Radiological anatomy of spine.ppt
 
Renal anomalies
Renal anomaliesRenal anomalies
Renal anomalies
 

Último

Último (20)

Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdfUnit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptxPlant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
 
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptxREMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptxWellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptxExploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - EnglishGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
 
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 

DOC-20230223-WA0019. copy.pptx

  • 2. Spine Radiography • Cervical Spine • Thoracolumber Spine
  • 3. Cervical Spine Radiography • Clinical considerations are particularly important because – normal C-spine X-rays cannot exclude significant injury – a missed C-spine fracture can lead to death – life long neurological deficit. • Clinico-radiological assessment of spinal injuries should be managed by experienced clinicians . • Imaging should not delay resuscitation.
  • 4. Cervical Spine Radiography • CT or MRI is often appropriate in the context of a – high risk injury, – neurological deficit, – limited clinical examination, or – where there are unclear X-ray findings.
  • 5. Cervical Spine Radiograph Standard View: – Anteroposterior view – Lateral View – Odontoid (Open Mouth View) Extended View – Swimmers View: when lateral radiograph fails to show vertebrae down to T1
  • 6. Cervical Spine Systemic Approach • Coverage - Adequate? • Alignment - Anterior/Posterior/Spinolaminar • Bones - Cortical outline/Vertebral body height • Spacing - Discs/Spinous processes • Soft tissues - Prevertebral • Edge of image
  • 7. Coverage - All vertebrae are visible from the skull base to the top of T1 (T1 is considered adequate) If T1 is not visible 'swimmer's' view Alignment - Check the Anterior line (the line of the anterior longitudinal ligament), the Posterior line (the line of the posterior longitudinal ligament), and the Spinolaminar line (the line formed by the anterior edge of the spinous processes - extends from inner edge of skull). Bone - Trace the cortical outline Note: The spinal cord (not visible) lies between the posterior and spinolaminar lines
  • 9. Cervical Spine Systemic Approach • Disc spaces - The vertebral bodies are spaced apart by the intervertebral discs - not directly visible with X-rays. These spaces should be approximately equal in height • Prevertebral soft tissue - Some fractures cause widening of the prevertebral soft tissue due to prevertebral haematoma • - Normal prevertebral soft tissue (asterisks) - narrow down to C4 and wider below - Above C4 ≤ 1/3rd vertebral body width - Below C4 ≤ 100% vertebral body width • Note: Not all C-spine fractures are accompanied by prevertebral hematoma - lack of prevertebral soft tissue thickening should NOT be taken as reassuring • Edge of image - Check other visible structures
  • 11. Cervical Spine Systemic Approach • Bone - The cortical outline is not always well defined but forcing your eye around the edge of all the bones will help you identify fractures • C2 Bone Ring - At C2 (Axis) the lateral masses viewed side on form a ring of corticated bone (red ring ) • This ring is not complete in all subjects and may appear as a double ring • A fracture is sometimes seen as a step in the ring outline
  • 13. C-spine systematic approach - Normal AP • Coverage - The AP view should cover the whole C-spine and the upper thoracic spine • Alignment - The lateral edges of the C-spine should be • aligned • Bone - Fractures are often less clearly visible on this view than on the lateral • Spacing - The spinous processes are in a straight line and spaced approximately evenly • Soft tissues - Check for surgical emphysema • Edges of image - Check for injury to the upper ribs and the lung apices for pneumothorax
  • 15. C-spine normal anatomy - Open mouth view • This view is considered adequate if it shows the alignment of the lateral processes of C1 and C2 • The distance between the peg and the lateral masses of C1 should be equal on each side • Note: In this image the odontoid peg is fully visible which is not often achievable in the context of trauma due to difficulty in patient positioning
  • 16.
  • 17. • The distance between the peg and the lateral processes is not equal - compare A (right) with B (left) • This is because when the image was acquired the patient's head was rotated to one side • Alignment of the lateral processes can still be assessed and is seen to be normal
  • 18. Swimmer's' view • This is an oblique view which projects the humeral heads away from the C-spine. A swimmer's view may be useful in assessing alignment at the cervico-thoracic junction if C7/T1 has not been adequately viewed on the lateral image, or on a repeated lateral image with the shoulders lowered. • The view is difficult to achieve, and often difficult to interpret. If plain X-ray imaging of the cervico-thoracic junction is limited then CT may be required.
  • 20. Thoracolumber spine • In the context of trauma similar principles apply to imaging both the Thoracic spine (T- spine) and the Lumbar spine (L-spine).
  • 21. Thoracolumber spine • Use a systematic approach • Correlate radiological findings with the clinical features • If 'instability' is suspected then further imaging with CT should be considered • If you see one fracture - check for another
  • 22. Thoracic spine - Standard views • AP and Lateral - Assess both views systematically . • Images of the thoracic and lumbar spine are often large and the bones should be scrutinized in detail • Note: The upper T-spine may not be visible on the lateral view - if injury is suspected here then a swimmer's view may be helpful
  • 23. Thoracolumbar spine - Systematic approach • Coverage - Adequate? • Alignment - Anterior/Posterior/Lateral • Bones - Cortical outline/Vertebral body height • Spacing - Discs/Spinous processes/Pedicles • Soft tissues - Paravertebral • Edge of image
  • 24. Thoracolumbar spine - Systematic approach • Lateral and AP • Coverage - The whole spine is visible on both views • Alignment - Follow the corners of the vertebral bodies from one level to the next • Bones - The vertebral bodies should gradually increase in size from top to bottom
  • 25. Thoracolumbar spine - Systematic approach • Spacing - Disc spaces gradually increase from superior to inferior - Note: Due to magnification and spine curvature the vertebral bodies and discs at the edges of the image can appear larger than those in the centre of the image • Soft tissues - Check the paravertebral line (see AP image below) • Edge of image - Check the other structures visible
  • 26.
  • 27. Thoracic spine - Systematic approach • Alignment - Vertebral body alignment is assessed by carefully matching the anterior and posterior corners of the vertebral bodies with the adjacent vertebra • Bones - Gradual increase in vertebral body height from superior to inferior • Spacing - Disc spaces gradually increase in height from superior to inferior
  • 28. VB = Vertebral body P = Pedicle SP = Spinous process (ribs overlying) F = Spinal nerve exit foramen
  • 29.
  • 30. Thoracic spine - Systematic approach • Alignment - The vertebral bodies and spinous processes (SP) are aligned • Bones - The vertebral bodies and pedicles are intact • Other visible bony structures include the transverse processes (TP), ribs, and the costovertebral and costotransverse joints • Spacing - Each disc space is of equal height when comparing left with right. The pedicles gradually become wider apart from superior to inferior • Soft tissue - Note the normal paravertebral soft tissue which forms a straight line on the left - distinct from the aorta
  • 31. Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach • Coverage - The whole L-spine should be visible on both views • Alignment - Follow the corners of the vertebral bodies from one level to the next (dotted lines) • Bones - Follow the cortical outline of each bone • Spacing - Disc spaces gradually increase in height from superior to inferior - Note: The L5/S1 space is normally slightly narrower than L4/L5
  • 32.
  • 33. Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach • Check the cortical outline of each vertebra • The facet joints comprise the inferior and superior articular processes of each adjacent level • The pars interarticularis literally means 'part between the joints' • P = Pedicle • SP = Spinous process
  • 35. Lumber Spine –Systemic Approach • Alignment - The vertebral bodies and spinous processes are aligned • Bones - The vertebral bodies and pedicles are intact • Spacing - Gradually increasing disc height from superior to inferior. The pedicles gradually become wider apart from superior to inferior - Note: The lower discs are angled away from the viewer and so are less easily assessed on this view
  • 37. • Check carefully for pedicle integrity and transverse process fractures
  • 38. Three column model • The Clinico-radiological assessment of thoracolumbar spine stability is usually performed by spinal surgeons with the help of radiologists. • A simple model commonly used for assessment of spinal stability is the 'three column' model. This states that if any 2 columns are injured then the injury is 'unstable'. This theory is an over simplification if applied to plain X-rays alone. It is important to be aware that some injuries are not visible on X-ray and that 2 and 3 column injuries may be underestimated as 1 or 2 column injuries respectively. • If spinal instability is suspected on the basis of clinical or radiological grounds then further imaging with CT should be considered.
  • 39.
  • 40. Three column model - Anatomy • Anterior column = Anterior half of the vertebral bodies and soft tissues • Middle column = Posterior half of the vertebral bodies and soft tissues • Posterior column = Posterior elements and soft soft tissues
  • 41. • Three column model - Fracture simulation • Injuries 1 and 2 affect one column only and are considered 'stable' • 1 - Spinous process injury • 2 - Anterior compression injury • Injuries 3 and 4 affect two or more columns and are considered 'unstable' • 3 - 'Burst' fracture • 4 - Flexion-distraction fracture - 'Chance' type injury Three column model - Fracture simulation