This document discusses how transdisciplinary research approaches can help link knowledge to actions that address sustainability challenges. It analyzes a case study where co-produced policy simulations shaped the creation of a new land use policy mechanism to conserve vernal pool ecosystems. Four key factors helped overcome challenges to enacting solutions: 1) creating a culture of learning between researchers and stakeholders, 2) using policy simulations as boundary objects to facilitate joint understanding, 3) integrating research into the solution development process, and 4) employing adaptive management. The document argues more focus is needed on these factors to better link knowledge to actions through transdisciplinary research.
Alex De Pinto
Global Landscapes Forum
IFPRI Session: Informing the policymaking landscape: From research to action in the fight against climate change and hunger
Marrakech, Morocco
November 16, 2016
Informing the policymaking landscape: From research to action in the fight ag...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presentation given by Alex De Pinto, of the Environment and Production Technology Division of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), at the Global Landscapes Forum on 16 November 2016 in Marrakesh, Morocco.
http://www.landscapes.org/
Addressing Complex Challenges Using A Co-Innovation Approach Lessons From Fi...Cynthia King
1) The document analyzes five case studies in New Zealand's primary sector that applied a co-innovation approach to address complex challenges.
2) The projects varied in their depth of stakeholder engagement, availability of ready-made solutions, and levels of conflicting interests.
3) The analysis found that in some cases, the co-innovation approach contributed to a shared understanding of problems among stakeholders. However, the effectiveness of co-innovation was context-specific.
Transformative Education: Towards a Relational, Justice-Oriented Approach to ...Zack Walsh
This paper aims to increase related knowledge across personal, social and ecological dimensions of sustainability and how it can be applied to support transformative learning. The paper provides a reflexive case study of the design, content and impact of a course on eco-justice that integrates relational learning with an equity and justice lens. The reflexive case study provides a critical, exploratory self-assessment, including interviews, group discussions and surveys with key stakeholders and course participants. The results show how relational approaches can support transformative learning for sustainability and provide concrete practices, pathways and recommendations for curricula development that other universities/training institutions could follow or learn from. Sustainability research, practice and education generally focuses on structural or systemic factors of transformation (e.g. technology, governance and policy) without due consideration as to how institutions and systems are shaping and shaped by the transformation of personal agency and subjectivity. This presents a vast untapped and under-studied potential for addressing deep leverage points for change by using a relational approach to link personal, societal and ecological transformations for sustainability.
A Framework For Teaching Socio-Environmental Problem-SolvingAngie Miller
This document proposes an educational framework for teaching socio-environmental problem solving. It emphasizes developing competencies for synthesizing social and environmental systems, integrating knowledge across disciplines, and producing actionable science. The framework is meant to provide guidance for developing curricula, teaching materials, and pedagogies for socio-environmental synthesis and interdisciplinary environmental education. It identifies the knowledge, skills, dispositions, and practices needed at undergraduate and graduate levels, and clarifies how these competencies can be applied to understand problems and generate solutions. The goal is a coherent vision for training students to become effective problem solvers of complex environmental challenges.
An Adaptive Learning Process for Developing and Applying Sustainability Indicators with Local Communities
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159`
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110
The document discusses e-learning in Canada based on a literature review and policy survey. It finds that while Canada pioneered e-learning infrastructure, it now lags some other countries. A national e-learning strategy and greater collaboration are needed. The document proposes developing a common framework, nurturing shared leadership, and establishing partnerships to coordinate e-learning policies across jurisdictions.
Alex De Pinto
Global Landscapes Forum
IFPRI Session: Informing the policymaking landscape: From research to action in the fight against climate change and hunger
Marrakech, Morocco
November 16, 2016
Informing the policymaking landscape: From research to action in the fight ag...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presentation given by Alex De Pinto, of the Environment and Production Technology Division of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), at the Global Landscapes Forum on 16 November 2016 in Marrakesh, Morocco.
http://www.landscapes.org/
Addressing Complex Challenges Using A Co-Innovation Approach Lessons From Fi...Cynthia King
1) The document analyzes five case studies in New Zealand's primary sector that applied a co-innovation approach to address complex challenges.
2) The projects varied in their depth of stakeholder engagement, availability of ready-made solutions, and levels of conflicting interests.
3) The analysis found that in some cases, the co-innovation approach contributed to a shared understanding of problems among stakeholders. However, the effectiveness of co-innovation was context-specific.
Transformative Education: Towards a Relational, Justice-Oriented Approach to ...Zack Walsh
This paper aims to increase related knowledge across personal, social and ecological dimensions of sustainability and how it can be applied to support transformative learning. The paper provides a reflexive case study of the design, content and impact of a course on eco-justice that integrates relational learning with an equity and justice lens. The reflexive case study provides a critical, exploratory self-assessment, including interviews, group discussions and surveys with key stakeholders and course participants. The results show how relational approaches can support transformative learning for sustainability and provide concrete practices, pathways and recommendations for curricula development that other universities/training institutions could follow or learn from. Sustainability research, practice and education generally focuses on structural or systemic factors of transformation (e.g. technology, governance and policy) without due consideration as to how institutions and systems are shaping and shaped by the transformation of personal agency and subjectivity. This presents a vast untapped and under-studied potential for addressing deep leverage points for change by using a relational approach to link personal, societal and ecological transformations for sustainability.
A Framework For Teaching Socio-Environmental Problem-SolvingAngie Miller
This document proposes an educational framework for teaching socio-environmental problem solving. It emphasizes developing competencies for synthesizing social and environmental systems, integrating knowledge across disciplines, and producing actionable science. The framework is meant to provide guidance for developing curricula, teaching materials, and pedagogies for socio-environmental synthesis and interdisciplinary environmental education. It identifies the knowledge, skills, dispositions, and practices needed at undergraduate and graduate levels, and clarifies how these competencies can be applied to understand problems and generate solutions. The goal is a coherent vision for training students to become effective problem solvers of complex environmental challenges.
An Adaptive Learning Process for Developing and Applying Sustainability Indicators with Local Communities
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159`
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110
The document discusses e-learning in Canada based on a literature review and policy survey. It finds that while Canada pioneered e-learning infrastructure, it now lags some other countries. A national e-learning strategy and greater collaboration are needed. The document proposes developing a common framework, nurturing shared leadership, and establishing partnerships to coordinate e-learning policies across jurisdictions.
Open education and social justice in the global south opportunities seized, m...ROER4D
This document discusses a study on open education and social justice in the global south. It summarizes the findings that while university lecturers frequently use open educational resources (OER), they are less likely to create or adapt OER due to lack of awareness, localizing challenges, and intellectual property restrictions. It argues that for OER to promote social justice, efforts are needed for proper localization, critical remixing, and transforming intellectual property policies to increase representation.
This presentation was provided by Glenn Hampson of Open Scholarship Initiative, during the NISO hot topic virtual conference "Open Research." The event was held on November 17, 2021.
Implementing Intervention Research into PublicPolicy—the BI3MalikPinckney86
This document discusses the need to better integrate intervention research and implementation research. It argues that intervention programs are often not successfully transferred into practice or public policy due to a lack of consideration for implementation factors. The document proposes a six-step approach called PASCIT to systematically connect intervention and implementation research from the beginning. This involves recognizing problems from a mission-driven perspective, ensuring robust intervention knowledge, identifying starting points for action, establishing cooperation with policymakers, and coordinating the joint development and implementation of interventions. An example of applying this approach is provided with the ViSC social competence program.
Addressing Gender Inequality In Science The Multifaceted Challenge Of Assess...Nathan Mathis
This document discusses approaches to assessing the impact of programs aimed at addressing gender inequality in science. It argues that a holistic, multidimensional approach is needed rather than focusing on a single issue. A complex, integrated solution is required as gender inequality stems from many interrelated factors. Assessing impact also needs to be complex to account for these interconnections and the multifaceted nature of the problem. A simple, linear model is insufficient and impact assessment must consider multiple components, contexts, and perspectives.
This document discusses open education and student co-creation of open textbooks at the University of Cape Town as a means to promote social justice. It outlines four models of open textbook production with varying levels of student and colleague collaboration. Case studies describe students taking roles in authoring and quality assurance processes. Interviews with authors found benefits like capturing student experiences and mentoring from students. While individual open initiatives can address injustices, the document argues true transformation requires institution-wide adoption to dismantle underlying power structures and embrace pluralism. Open education must advocate for free knowledge access globally to fulfill its social justice potential.
10 heuristics for modeling decision makingBarney Stacher
This document discusses ten heuristics for developing interdisciplinary simulation models through collaborative teamwork. It begins by describing the value of integrated system models for addressing complex environmental problems but notes the challenges of developing such models interdisciplinarily.
The heuristics discussed include: carefully selecting team members with big-picture thinking skills; heavily investing in early problem definition through negotiation; and using rapid prototyping rather than attempting to fully specify models upfront. The Sustainability of Arctic Communities project is used to illustrate these heuristics, such as how developing initial conceptual models aided in problem definition and team assembly.
This study aimed to determine if a social media intervention could encourage environmentally responsible behavior among students. The researcher created a Facebook group for students living in a dorm to reduce their waste in food, water, energy, and solid waste over 3 weeks. Surveys before and after measured conservation behavior, identity, and campus norms. The preliminary results found the social media intervention had a minimal impact on reducing waste among the 29 participants. This suggests social media alone may be ineffective for encouraging conservation behavior change, though more engagement was needed.
This document summarizes a report on strengthening the science-policy interface for sustainable development. It discusses the role of the UN high-level political forum on sustainable development (HLPF) in facilitating dialogue between scientists and policymakers. The report identifies several possible roles for the HLPF, including: 1) providing policy-relevant data and analysis from existing assessments; 2) supporting enhanced dialogue through forums and engagement of scientists; and 3) helping translate global discussions into regional and national policy frameworks. Strengthening the science-policy interface is important for effective monitoring and implementation of the UN's sustainable development goals.
The document discusses the development of an interdisciplinary sustainability program at Fairleigh Dickinson University. It describes how the curriculum draws from various disciplines like geology, meteorology, and economics to provide an integrated learning experience for students. Some challenges in developing the program included territoriality between departments and skepticism about climate change. The first courses for the new sustainability program were offered this semester.
This document discusses chemistry outreach as a community of practice, specifically investigating the relationship between student facilitators' experiences and boundary processes in a student-run organization. It provides context on informal science learning and the importance of outreach programs. It uses communities of practice as a framework, describing key elements like domains, participation tiers, and boundary processes. Student organizations participating in outreach can be conceptualized as a community of practice. Interviews with 9 graduate students explore how diversity influences boundary processes and participation based on factors like gender, race, and prior experiences.
The role of education in changing behaviour for sustainabilityNeil Dufty
Behaviour is what people do. People perform a host of environmentally appropriate and inappropriate behaviours every day.
Governments around the world have made numerous legal agreements that commit their countries to take responsibility for a suite of actions to change and move society towards sustainability. Such progress to sustainability depends on the behaviour of people in all walks of life, requiring changes in their way of thinking, living and working.
These background notes provide a theoretical framework for developing education programs that lead to behaviour change for sustainability.
Calling the Roll: Study Circles for Better SchoolsNatalie Aflalo
Policy Research Report. A two-year evaluation by the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory of statewide study circle programs that addressed education issues in Arkansas and Oklahoma. This study places special emphasis on the role of policymakers in study circles.
Policy Research Report. A two-year evaluation by the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory of statewide study circle programs that addressed education issues in Arkansas and Oklahoma. This study places special emphasis on the role of policymakers in study circles.
Open education and social justice in the global south opportunities seized, m...ROER4D
This document discusses open education and social justice in the global south. It summarizes findings from research on how university lecturers in developing countries create, use, and adapt open educational resources (OER). The research found that while use of existing OER is common, creation and adaptation of OER by lecturers is less frequent due to various barriers. It then analyzes how OER can help address economic, cultural, and political injustices based on Fraser's social justice framework, and identifies opportunities for OER to promote both ameliorative and transformative social change.
Evidence-based intervention and services for high-riskyouthBetseyCalderon89
Evidence-based intervention and services for high-risk
youth: a North American perspective on the challenges of
integration for policy, practice and research
James K. Whittaker
Charles O. Cressey Endowed Professor Emeritus, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle,
Washington, USA
A B S T R AC T
This paper explores the cross-national challenges of integrating
evidence-based interventions into existing services for high-resource-
using children and youth. Using several North American model
programme exemplars that have demonstrated efficacy, the paper
explores multiple challenges confronting policy-makers, evaluation
researchers and practitioners who seek to enhance outcomes for
troubled children and youth and improve overall service effective-
ness. The paper concludes with practical implications for youth and
family professionals, researchers, service agencies and policy–makers,
with particular emphasis on possibilities for cross-national
collaboration.
Correspondence:
James K. Whittaker,
School of Social Work,
University of Washington,
4101 Fifteenth Avenue NE,
Seattle, WA 98105-6299,
USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: children in need (services
for), evidence-based practice,
research in practice, therapeutic
social work
Accepted for publication: January
2009
I N T R O D U C T I O N
Across many national boundaries and within multiple
service contexts – juvenile justice, child mental and
child welfare – there is a growing concern about a
proportionately small number of multiply challenged
children and youth who consume a disproportionate
share of service resources, professional time and public
attention. While accurate, empirically validated popu-
lation estimates and descriptions remain elusive. The
consensus of many international youth and family
researchers, including those reported by McAuley
and Davis (2009) (UK), Pecora et al. (2009a) (US)
and Egelund and Lausten (2009) (Denmark) in this
present volume seems to be that some combination of
externalizing, ‘acting-out’ behaviour, problems with
substance abuse, identified and often untreated mental
health problems, experience with trauma and challeng-
ing familial and neighbourhood factors are often, and
in various combinations, manifest in the population of
children and youth most challenging to serve. Many of
these find their way into intensive out-of-home care
services, and Thoburn (2007) provides a useful
window into the out-of-home care status of children in
14 countries and offers useful observations on
improvements in collecting administrative data for
child and family services to inform both policy and
practice. Others call for a critical re-examination of the
present status of ‘placement’ as a central fulcrum
in child and family services policy and practice
(Whittaker & Maluccio 2002).
A sense of urgency is conveyed by the fact that
many child and youth clients of ‘deep-end’, restrictive
(out-of-home) services disproportionately represent
underserved ...
This document discusses educational research and its relationship to special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). It makes three key points:
1) Educational research should be close to practice, focus on what works and for whom, and cause problems as well as solve them. Research needs to build impact evaluation and evidence of impact on schools.
2) SEND needs educational research to support inclusion, address marketization pressures, and apply evidence-based practices, while research needs SEND to consider impact and dissemination.
3) An example research project analyzed data and interviewed stakeholders across school consortia and support teams, finding that collaboration enabled better coordination and support for students with complex needs.
This document discusses an interdisciplinary research project examining hydraulic fracturing (fracking) from the perspectives of organizational leadership and mass communication. It defines the research question as how ecological leadership and media influence can advance understanding of opportunities and challenges for families and communities where fracking occurs. The document reviews literature on ecological leadership theory and mass communication theory, including agenda setting theory and framing. It analyzes how these perspectives can provide insights into leadership roles and communication approaches regarding the complex issues around fracking.
Dr. Glenda Cox is a scholar who has been researching and advocating for open education at the University of Cape Town since 2007. Her most recent project from 2018-2021 focused on open educational resources for development. This included research, advocacy, and implementation initiatives following previous open education work. Cox aims to increase access to education through open textbooks and practices that address social justice issues. She discusses how open education can promote economic equity, cultural diversity, and political inclusion. Cox also provides guidance on becoming an open scholar by understanding copyright, using Creative Commons licenses, and adopting open pedagogical practices that emphasize collaboration and sharing.
Three good reasons to understand the research impact of a technology-enabled ...Helen Farley
The real-world impact of research is gaining much attention across the international Higher Education sector. Funding agencies, government organisations and community groups are seeking evidence that research initiatives are delivering impact beyond contributions to academia.
Researchers, practitioners, educators, learning designers and developers require a good understanding of research impact, and associated terminology, to articulate the real-world benefits of technology-enabled initiatives. There are three good reasons to understand research impact in a
Higher Education context. Firstly, comprehending the language of research impact facilitates meaningful discussion with research stakeholders. Secondly, recognising and communicating the real-world impact of an initiative affirms the ‘so what’ factor of a research project. And thirdly, demonstrating research impact, rather than reporting research outputs, is becoming more important in funding applications and project documentation. This paper concludes with a brief review of assessment frameworks developed to evaluate the real-world impact of Higher
Education research.
The document provides instructions for requesting and receiving writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account; 2) Complete an order form with instructions and deadline; 3) Review bids from writers and select one; 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment; 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction. It emphasizes that original, high-quality content is guaranteed, with refunds offered for plagiarized work.
How To Write A Research Introduction 10 Steps (WitJessica Thompson
This document provides steps for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net:
1. Create an account with a password and valid email.
2. Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, deadline, and attaching a sample if wanting the writer to imitate your style.
3. Review bids from writers based on qualifications, history, and feedback, then place a deposit to start the assignment.
4. Review the completed paper and authorize final payment if pleased, or request revisions using the free revision policy.
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a Actions Speak Louder Than Words Designing Transdisciplinary Approaches To Enact Solutions
Open education and social justice in the global south opportunities seized, m...ROER4D
This document discusses a study on open education and social justice in the global south. It summarizes the findings that while university lecturers frequently use open educational resources (OER), they are less likely to create or adapt OER due to lack of awareness, localizing challenges, and intellectual property restrictions. It argues that for OER to promote social justice, efforts are needed for proper localization, critical remixing, and transforming intellectual property policies to increase representation.
This presentation was provided by Glenn Hampson of Open Scholarship Initiative, during the NISO hot topic virtual conference "Open Research." The event was held on November 17, 2021.
Implementing Intervention Research into PublicPolicy—the BI3MalikPinckney86
This document discusses the need to better integrate intervention research and implementation research. It argues that intervention programs are often not successfully transferred into practice or public policy due to a lack of consideration for implementation factors. The document proposes a six-step approach called PASCIT to systematically connect intervention and implementation research from the beginning. This involves recognizing problems from a mission-driven perspective, ensuring robust intervention knowledge, identifying starting points for action, establishing cooperation with policymakers, and coordinating the joint development and implementation of interventions. An example of applying this approach is provided with the ViSC social competence program.
Addressing Gender Inequality In Science The Multifaceted Challenge Of Assess...Nathan Mathis
This document discusses approaches to assessing the impact of programs aimed at addressing gender inequality in science. It argues that a holistic, multidimensional approach is needed rather than focusing on a single issue. A complex, integrated solution is required as gender inequality stems from many interrelated factors. Assessing impact also needs to be complex to account for these interconnections and the multifaceted nature of the problem. A simple, linear model is insufficient and impact assessment must consider multiple components, contexts, and perspectives.
This document discusses open education and student co-creation of open textbooks at the University of Cape Town as a means to promote social justice. It outlines four models of open textbook production with varying levels of student and colleague collaboration. Case studies describe students taking roles in authoring and quality assurance processes. Interviews with authors found benefits like capturing student experiences and mentoring from students. While individual open initiatives can address injustices, the document argues true transformation requires institution-wide adoption to dismantle underlying power structures and embrace pluralism. Open education must advocate for free knowledge access globally to fulfill its social justice potential.
10 heuristics for modeling decision makingBarney Stacher
This document discusses ten heuristics for developing interdisciplinary simulation models through collaborative teamwork. It begins by describing the value of integrated system models for addressing complex environmental problems but notes the challenges of developing such models interdisciplinarily.
The heuristics discussed include: carefully selecting team members with big-picture thinking skills; heavily investing in early problem definition through negotiation; and using rapid prototyping rather than attempting to fully specify models upfront. The Sustainability of Arctic Communities project is used to illustrate these heuristics, such as how developing initial conceptual models aided in problem definition and team assembly.
This study aimed to determine if a social media intervention could encourage environmentally responsible behavior among students. The researcher created a Facebook group for students living in a dorm to reduce their waste in food, water, energy, and solid waste over 3 weeks. Surveys before and after measured conservation behavior, identity, and campus norms. The preliminary results found the social media intervention had a minimal impact on reducing waste among the 29 participants. This suggests social media alone may be ineffective for encouraging conservation behavior change, though more engagement was needed.
This document summarizes a report on strengthening the science-policy interface for sustainable development. It discusses the role of the UN high-level political forum on sustainable development (HLPF) in facilitating dialogue between scientists and policymakers. The report identifies several possible roles for the HLPF, including: 1) providing policy-relevant data and analysis from existing assessments; 2) supporting enhanced dialogue through forums and engagement of scientists; and 3) helping translate global discussions into regional and national policy frameworks. Strengthening the science-policy interface is important for effective monitoring and implementation of the UN's sustainable development goals.
The document discusses the development of an interdisciplinary sustainability program at Fairleigh Dickinson University. It describes how the curriculum draws from various disciplines like geology, meteorology, and economics to provide an integrated learning experience for students. Some challenges in developing the program included territoriality between departments and skepticism about climate change. The first courses for the new sustainability program were offered this semester.
This document discusses chemistry outreach as a community of practice, specifically investigating the relationship between student facilitators' experiences and boundary processes in a student-run organization. It provides context on informal science learning and the importance of outreach programs. It uses communities of practice as a framework, describing key elements like domains, participation tiers, and boundary processes. Student organizations participating in outreach can be conceptualized as a community of practice. Interviews with 9 graduate students explore how diversity influences boundary processes and participation based on factors like gender, race, and prior experiences.
The role of education in changing behaviour for sustainabilityNeil Dufty
Behaviour is what people do. People perform a host of environmentally appropriate and inappropriate behaviours every day.
Governments around the world have made numerous legal agreements that commit their countries to take responsibility for a suite of actions to change and move society towards sustainability. Such progress to sustainability depends on the behaviour of people in all walks of life, requiring changes in their way of thinking, living and working.
These background notes provide a theoretical framework for developing education programs that lead to behaviour change for sustainability.
Calling the Roll: Study Circles for Better SchoolsNatalie Aflalo
Policy Research Report. A two-year evaluation by the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory of statewide study circle programs that addressed education issues in Arkansas and Oklahoma. This study places special emphasis on the role of policymakers in study circles.
Policy Research Report. A two-year evaluation by the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory of statewide study circle programs that addressed education issues in Arkansas and Oklahoma. This study places special emphasis on the role of policymakers in study circles.
Open education and social justice in the global south opportunities seized, m...ROER4D
This document discusses open education and social justice in the global south. It summarizes findings from research on how university lecturers in developing countries create, use, and adapt open educational resources (OER). The research found that while use of existing OER is common, creation and adaptation of OER by lecturers is less frequent due to various barriers. It then analyzes how OER can help address economic, cultural, and political injustices based on Fraser's social justice framework, and identifies opportunities for OER to promote both ameliorative and transformative social change.
Evidence-based intervention and services for high-riskyouthBetseyCalderon89
Evidence-based intervention and services for high-risk
youth: a North American perspective on the challenges of
integration for policy, practice and research
James K. Whittaker
Charles O. Cressey Endowed Professor Emeritus, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle,
Washington, USA
A B S T R AC T
This paper explores the cross-national challenges of integrating
evidence-based interventions into existing services for high-resource-
using children and youth. Using several North American model
programme exemplars that have demonstrated efficacy, the paper
explores multiple challenges confronting policy-makers, evaluation
researchers and practitioners who seek to enhance outcomes for
troubled children and youth and improve overall service effective-
ness. The paper concludes with practical implications for youth and
family professionals, researchers, service agencies and policy–makers,
with particular emphasis on possibilities for cross-national
collaboration.
Correspondence:
James K. Whittaker,
School of Social Work,
University of Washington,
4101 Fifteenth Avenue NE,
Seattle, WA 98105-6299,
USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: children in need (services
for), evidence-based practice,
research in practice, therapeutic
social work
Accepted for publication: January
2009
I N T R O D U C T I O N
Across many national boundaries and within multiple
service contexts – juvenile justice, child mental and
child welfare – there is a growing concern about a
proportionately small number of multiply challenged
children and youth who consume a disproportionate
share of service resources, professional time and public
attention. While accurate, empirically validated popu-
lation estimates and descriptions remain elusive. The
consensus of many international youth and family
researchers, including those reported by McAuley
and Davis (2009) (UK), Pecora et al. (2009a) (US)
and Egelund and Lausten (2009) (Denmark) in this
present volume seems to be that some combination of
externalizing, ‘acting-out’ behaviour, problems with
substance abuse, identified and often untreated mental
health problems, experience with trauma and challeng-
ing familial and neighbourhood factors are often, and
in various combinations, manifest in the population of
children and youth most challenging to serve. Many of
these find their way into intensive out-of-home care
services, and Thoburn (2007) provides a useful
window into the out-of-home care status of children in
14 countries and offers useful observations on
improvements in collecting administrative data for
child and family services to inform both policy and
practice. Others call for a critical re-examination of the
present status of ‘placement’ as a central fulcrum
in child and family services policy and practice
(Whittaker & Maluccio 2002).
A sense of urgency is conveyed by the fact that
many child and youth clients of ‘deep-end’, restrictive
(out-of-home) services disproportionately represent
underserved ...
This document discusses educational research and its relationship to special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). It makes three key points:
1) Educational research should be close to practice, focus on what works and for whom, and cause problems as well as solve them. Research needs to build impact evaluation and evidence of impact on schools.
2) SEND needs educational research to support inclusion, address marketization pressures, and apply evidence-based practices, while research needs SEND to consider impact and dissemination.
3) An example research project analyzed data and interviewed stakeholders across school consortia and support teams, finding that collaboration enabled better coordination and support for students with complex needs.
This document discusses an interdisciplinary research project examining hydraulic fracturing (fracking) from the perspectives of organizational leadership and mass communication. It defines the research question as how ecological leadership and media influence can advance understanding of opportunities and challenges for families and communities where fracking occurs. The document reviews literature on ecological leadership theory and mass communication theory, including agenda setting theory and framing. It analyzes how these perspectives can provide insights into leadership roles and communication approaches regarding the complex issues around fracking.
Dr. Glenda Cox is a scholar who has been researching and advocating for open education at the University of Cape Town since 2007. Her most recent project from 2018-2021 focused on open educational resources for development. This included research, advocacy, and implementation initiatives following previous open education work. Cox aims to increase access to education through open textbooks and practices that address social justice issues. She discusses how open education can promote economic equity, cultural diversity, and political inclusion. Cox also provides guidance on becoming an open scholar by understanding copyright, using Creative Commons licenses, and adopting open pedagogical practices that emphasize collaboration and sharing.
Three good reasons to understand the research impact of a technology-enabled ...Helen Farley
The real-world impact of research is gaining much attention across the international Higher Education sector. Funding agencies, government organisations and community groups are seeking evidence that research initiatives are delivering impact beyond contributions to academia.
Researchers, practitioners, educators, learning designers and developers require a good understanding of research impact, and associated terminology, to articulate the real-world benefits of technology-enabled initiatives. There are three good reasons to understand research impact in a
Higher Education context. Firstly, comprehending the language of research impact facilitates meaningful discussion with research stakeholders. Secondly, recognising and communicating the real-world impact of an initiative affirms the ‘so what’ factor of a research project. And thirdly, demonstrating research impact, rather than reporting research outputs, is becoming more important in funding applications and project documentation. This paper concludes with a brief review of assessment frameworks developed to evaluate the real-world impact of Higher
Education research.
Similar a Actions Speak Louder Than Words Designing Transdisciplinary Approaches To Enact Solutions (20)
The document provides instructions for requesting and receiving writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account; 2) Complete an order form with instructions and deadline; 3) Review bids from writers and select one; 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment; 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction. It emphasizes that original, high-quality content is guaranteed, with refunds offered for plagiarized work.
How To Write A Research Introduction 10 Steps (WitJessica Thompson
This document provides steps for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net:
1. Create an account with a password and valid email.
2. Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, deadline, and attaching a sample if wanting the writer to imitate your style.
3. Review bids from writers based on qualifications, history, and feedback, then place a deposit to start the assignment.
4. Review the completed paper and authorize final payment if pleased, or request revisions using the free revision policy.
The document discusses Disney's 1959 animated film Sleeping Beauty. It notes that Disney adapted the classic European fairy tale and transported it to a medieval setting. Disney used the latest animation technologies of the time to bring the story and characters to life. However, he also imposed his own American ideals and perspectives onto the source material through the film's retelling of the story. The document suggests Disney effectively Americanized the fairy tale through his technical skills and ideological approach to the adaptation and interpretation of the source text.
Hamburger Writing Template By Kids Korner TeachersJessica Thompson
The document provides instructions for requesting and completing an assignment writing request through the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email; 2) Complete a 10-minute order form with instructions, sources, and deadline; 3) Review bids from writers and select one; 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment; 5) Request revisions until satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarism. The process aims to match clients with qualified writers to meet assignment needs.
Here is a summary of my thoughts on Robert Cohn's character in The Sun Also Rises by Ernest Hemingway:
Initially, Robert Cohn seems like a bit of an outsider in Jake Barnes and his friends' circle. He is described as being Jewish, which sets him apart from the others. His mannerisms also seem stiff and awkward compared to the casual, carefree way the others carry themselves.
However, as the novel progresses, Cohn's insecurities and neediness become more apparent. He is obsessed with Brett Ashley and keeps pursuing her, even though she has made it clear she is not interested in him. His jealousy of Brett and Jake's close friendship also comes across as petty and
Term Paper Outline For High School - Research PaperJessica Thompson
The document provides instructions for creating an account and submitting a request for writing assistance on the HelpWriting.net website. It explains that users can complete an order form with their assignment details and choose a writer to complete the work, and that the site uses a bidding system to match users with qualified writers. The document also notes that users can request revisions to ensure satisfaction with the completed work.
The document provides instructions for creating an account and submitting assignment requests on the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied with the work. The purpose is to explain how to obtain writing help by outsourcing assignments to qualified writers on the site.
The document provides instructions for how to request an assignment be written by a writer on the HelpWriting.net site, including creating an account, completing an order form with details and deadline, and reviewing bids from writers to select one. The process uses a bidding system where the customer can choose a writer based on qualifications, order history, and feedback. Customers can also request revisions until they are satisfied with the completed assignment.
The document provides a 5-step guide to writing a term paper with HelpWriting.net's assistance. It explains that students should first create an account, then complete an order form providing instructions and deadlines. Writers will bid on the request, and students can choose a writer based on qualifications. Students can request revisions until satisfied with the paper and receive a refund if the paper is plagiarized. The site aims to provide original, high-quality content and ensure student needs are met.
This document provides instructions for requesting and completing an assignment writing request on the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5 step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10 minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with the option of a full refund for plagiarized work.
Essay Writing Website Best Website To Write Your EssayJessica Thompson
Diplo has an incredible work ethic that has led to his success as one of the hottest producers in music today. He draws from a diverse set of influences and is constantly working to hone his craft. While also known to be a bit of a TV nerd and romantic, Diplo's dedication to his work shows in his willingness to spend long hours in the studio and strive for musical excellence.
Printable Peppa Pig Reading And Writing Worksheet - MJessica Thompson
This document discusses export and import strategies for shipping lines through a comparative study. It acknowledges those who provided guidance and support during the project. The preface notes that shipping industry is important nationally and a strong accounting framework is crucial. Details of the comparative study analyzing different shipping line strategies will be provided on HelpWriting.net to evaluate approaches and identify best practices.
College Essay Clichs To Avoid (And Better AlternativJessica Thompson
The document discusses using the U2 song "Sweetest Thing" on a movie soundtrack for The Count of Monte Cristo, noting that the song captures the tone of the beginning of the story where the main character is a perfect man about to marry and be promoted to captain, while also hinting at a coming change in fortune through lyrics repeating "I'm not afraid of anything." The song is chosen for conveying the vividly different yet promising opening of the story before impending difficulties are faced.
The document provides tips for writing essays online with HelpWriting.net. It outlines the 5-step process: 1) Create an account; 2) Complete an order form with instructions and deadline; 3) Review writer bids and choose one; 4) Review the paper and authorize payment; 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction. It emphasizes HelpWriting.net's commitment to original, high-quality work and full refunds for plagiarized content.
6 Best Images Of Free Printable Dotted Line Writing Paper - Free ...Jessica Thompson
The document discusses the steps involved in requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net:
1. Create an account with a password and valid email.
2. Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, deadline, and attaching a sample for style imitation.
3. Review bids from writers and choose one based on qualifications, history, and feedback, then pay a deposit to start.
4. Ensure the paper meets expectations and authorize full payment, or request revisions for free until satisfied.
Analytical Essay Writing Tips For College StudentJessica Thompson
Here are the key points about contraceptives and contraceptive implants:
- Contraception allows females to plan if and when they want to have a baby by preventing pregnancy. It has been widely used since FDA approval over 50 years ago.
- There are various contraceptive options including long acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) like implants and IUDs that are effective for several years.
- Contraceptive implants are small flexible rods inserted under the skin of the upper arm that release progestin to prevent pregnancy. They are highly effective for 3 years and reversible.
- Implants have higher continuation rates than other methods like pills due to convenience of long-term protection without daily action. Discontinuation
Scholarship Essays Help 4 Ways To Make Your EssayJessica Thompson
The document discusses the evolution of healthcare in Canada over the past four decades. It introduces how health insurance was first proposed in the 1990s as part of an election campaign and funded publicly, though it was not implemented successfully at first. The Canadian health act of 1984 established the five principles of public administration, comprehensiveness, universality, portability, and accessibility that guide the national healthcare system. The summary concludes with an instruction to explain events since the implementation of the Canadian health act.
This document provides instructions for creating an account and requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It is a 5 step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10 minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one based on qualifications. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with a full refund option for plagiarized work. The process aims to match clients with qualified writers and provide original, high-quality content through revisions.
The document describes the author's experience visiting an Ethiopian restaurant called Ras Ka, noting the smells of traditional spices and the open kitchen. It discusses injera, the traditional Ethiopian bread made from tef that is used to scoop up spicy lentil and vegetable dishes. While finding the tea and injera bland, the author appreciated experiencing aspects of Ethiopian cuisine and culture at the restaurant.
Essay Books. How To Write Essays About Books. 2019Jessica Thompson
The document provides instructions for writing an essay about books on the website HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review writer bids and choose one based on qualifications. 4) Review the paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions until fully satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarized work. The website promises original, high-quality content to meet customer needs.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Actions Speak Louder Than Words Designing Transdisciplinary Approaches To Enact Solutions
1. University of New Hampshire
University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository
Faculty Publications
1-4-2019
Actions speak louder than words: designing
transdisciplinary approaches to enact solutions
Vanessa R. Levesque
University of New Hampshire, Durham, Vanessa.Levesque@unh.edu
Aram J. K. Calhoun
University of Maine, Orono
Kathleen P. Bell
University of Maine, Orono
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact
nicole.hentz@unh.edu.
Recommended Citation
Levesque, V.R., Bell, K.P., Calhoun, A.J.K. 2019. Actions speak louder than words: Designing transdisciplinary approaches to enact
solutions. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.
2. 1
Actions speak louder than words: Designing transdisciplinary approaches to enact solutions
Abstract
Sustainability science uses a transdisciplinary research process in which academic and non-
academic partners collaborate to identify a common problem and co-produce knowledge to develop
more sustainable solutions. Sustainability scientists have advanced the theory and practice of facilitating
collaborative efforts such that the knowledge created is usable. There has been less emphasis, however,
on the last step of the transdisciplinary process: enacting solutions. We analyzed a case study of a
transdisciplinary research effort in which co-produced policy simulation information shaped the creation
of a new policy mechanism. More specifically, by studying the development of a mechanism for
conserving vernal pool ecosystems we found that four factors helped overcome common challenges to
acting upon new information: creating a culture of learning, co-producing policy simulations that acted
as boundary objects, integrating research into solution development, and employing an adaptive
management approach. With an increased focus on these four factors that enable action, we can better
develop the same level of nuanced theoretical concepts currently characterizing the earlier phases of
transdisciplinary research, and the practical advice for deliberately designing these efforts.
Key words: collaboration, co-production, transdisciplinary, knowledge to action, land use policy, vernal
pool
3. 2
Introduction
A key goal of sustainability science is to develop creative, equitable and socially relevant
solutions to complex, ‘wicked’ problems (Brandt et al., 2013; Clark, 2007; Clark & Dickson, 2003; McKee,
Guimaraes, & Pinto-Correia, 2015; Miller, 2013; Polk, 2014; Wiek et al., 2015). Yet sustainability
researchers are increasingly aware of the difficultly in doing so, and are interested in ensuring that their
work produces knowledge that spurs action addressing the complex problems on which they focus
(Clark, van Kerkhoff, Lebel, & Gallopin, 2016). In many settings, effective work towards solutions
requires researchers from multiple disciplines to collaborate with non-academic partners who can
contribute context-specific and practice-based knowledge (Jacobs et al., 2016), and for these
collaborative teams to integrate and apply the new knowledge (Binder, Absenger-Helmli, & Schilling,
2015; Zscheischler & Rogga, 2015). A transdisciplinary research framework offers an attractive approach
because it ideally includes the integration of multiple disciplines along with the expertise of non-
academic partners in the co-production of solutions-oriented and socially relevant knowledge (Binder et
al., 2015; Polk, 2015). We define co-production as these interactions between researchers and non-
academic actors to produce and apply policy-relevant science (van Kerkhoff & Lebel, 2015; Wyborn,
2015).
While transdisciplinary research can potentially enable researchers to contribute to societal
challenges and help local stakeholders tap into expertise, it also takes time and effort from both
stakeholders and researchers and there is not yet certainty that such an effort will result in improved
outcomes (Godemann, 2008; Miller et al., 2014; Polk, 2014; Wiek et al., 2015). Although there have
been some prominent examples of successfully linking knowledge to action (Buizer, Jacobs, & Cash,
2016; Clark, Tomich, et al., 2016; Clark, van Kerkhoff, et al., 2016; Hart & Calhoun, 2010; Jacobs et al.,
2016; McCullough & Matson, 2012), there are few theories or practical lessons of how to ensure co-
produced knowledge facilitates action (Blackstock, Kelly, & Horsey, 2007; Polk, 2014; van Kerkhoff &
4. 3
Lebel, 2006; Wiek, Ness, Schweizer-Ries, Brand, & Farioli, 2012; Wuelser & Pohl, 2016). Without greater
emphasis on the ways in which knowledge co-production is translated to action, researchers and
practitioners may be limited in their ability to implement solutions to sustainability challenges.
Transdisciplinary approaches provide an opportunity, in particular, for improving land-use
planning and policy actions (Maiello, Battaglia, Daddi, & Frey, 2011; Schauppenlehner-Kloyber & Penker,
2015; Zscheischler & Rogga, 2015). While private land use is regulated at federal and state levels in the
US, the political, economic and ecological dynamics surrounding land use often play out at the municipal
level (Brody, Highfield, & Carrasco, 2004; Feiock, Tavares, & Lubell, 2008; Gerber & Rissman, 2012;
Levesque, Bell, & Calhoun, 2017). The complexity and interconnectivity of the social, economic and
environmental issues surrounding private land development make it a classic sustainability challenge.
Agriculture, homes and businesses provide us with the food, shelter and goods on which we rely and
enjoy as a society. Yet the conversion of natural and semi-natural landscapes to create these goods is a
leading cause of habitat fragmentation and loss (Hunter, 2005; Stokes, Hanson, Oaks, Straub, & Ponio,
2009; Wilcove & Lee, 2004). The use of growth control regulations to limit environmental impacts gives
rise to conflicts about important economic and social benefits of development, as well as the extent and
manner by which property rights should be limited (Doremus, 2003; Irwin, Bell, & Geoghegan, 2003;
Paloniemi & Tikka, 2008). Additionally, with a recent focus on complementing or replacing traditional
zoning with market- or incentive-based strategies to protect resources (Beeton & Lynch, 2012; Norton,
2000; Paloniemi & Tikka, 2008; Pirard, 2012; Shortle, 2013), municipal leaders may lack expertise in
assessing alternative instruments of land protection within the context of their municipality
(Hockenstein et al., 1997). Transdisciplinary approaches can advance existing collaborations between
land use planners and researchers interested in identifying and applying new information to innovative
solutions (Zscheischler & Rogga, 2015).
5. 4
The transdisciplinary approach to linking knowledge to action
The transdisciplinary research process is often conceptualized as three interrelated phases: (1)
building a collaborative team consisting of academic and non-academic stakeholders and jointly framing
the problem, (2) co-producing problem-specific knowledge, and (3) integrating and applying the co-
produced knowledge by both scientists and practitioners (Binder et al., 2015; Godemann, 2008; Lang et
al., 2012). Sustainability scientists have greatly advanced the understanding of these processes in the
last decade. For example, Clark et al. (Clark, van Kerkhoff, et al., 2016) illuminates key things researchers
should know and should do related to creating usable knowledge, which is knowledge produced to
facilitate decision-making related to a specific societal problem (Dilling & Lemos, 2011). However, while
difficulties emerge in each of the three phases, the biggest challenges in the process often stem from an
inability to link knowledge produced to planning and decision-making processes such that change
occurs, even when the knowledge produced could be deemed ‘usable’ and socially robust (Polk, 2014).
Much less emphasis has gone into understanding how to conceptualize and overcome these challenges.
We reviewed existing literature that analyzed how knowledge supported action within
transdisciplinary approaches to solving problems to identify factors that limit the degree to which
coproduced knowledge was applied to a new action or solution on-the ground, and we synthesized the
information about these factors to develop four broad categories that represent major challenges to
connecting knowledge to new action (Table 1). First, individuals in heterogeneous groups need to both
transfer their knowledge to others as well as enlarge their perspectives to value and assimilate others’
information into their own knowledge structures (Godemann, 2008; Polk, 2015). Second, groups often
need to develop common conceptualizations of their complex problem to develop innovative solutions
(Binder et al., 2015; Godemann, 2008; Harris & Lyon, 2013). Third, even when joint learning occurs,
there is often no explicit link to specific planning and decision contexts, creating a gap between new
knowledge and new action (Polk, 2014). Fourth, when transdisciplinary processes do develop solutions,
6. 5
those proposed actions may lack legitimacy when transferred back to specific decision-making bodies
(Binder et al., 2015; Clark, van Kerkhoff, et al., 2016; Hart & Calhoun, 2010; Lang et al., 2012; Polk,
2014). If transdisciplinary processes truly occur in an intermediary space between academia and policy
or if the processes do not include participants with decision-making authority in their own sphere, the
results of such efforts may not be viewed as belonging to either sphere when brought back; rather,
results often must be re-framed and re-packaged in ways that speak to different contexts such that they
will be accepted in these disparate institutional settings (Polk, 2014).
Table 1: Challenges in linking co-produced knowledge to new action in transdisciplinary research
Challenge Description Key literature
Integrated
knowledge
Members of diverse groups transfer their knowledge to
others, and value, understand and assimilate other’s
information and perspectives. Participants may differ in
what they believe to be relevant knowledge, or they may
lack the time required for true understanding and
integration of new information.
Godemann, 2008;
Polk, 2015
Joint mental
models
Members create shared conceptualizations of the problem
and interrelated issues. To do so, group processes should
foster trust, norms, shared power, social learning, among
other factors.
Binder et al., 2015;
Godemann, 2008;
Harris & Lyon, 2013
Explicit link
between new
knowledge and
specific
decision
Group identifies where and what type of decisions are
needed for action. Complications arise when new
knowledge is not translated into recommended actions,
specific decision points are not identified, or decisions
occur on a different time scale than the collaborative
process.
Polk, 2014
Legitimate
solutions
Partners ensure proposed solutions will be deemed
legitimate. The participants may not have decision-making
authority or political mandate, power imbalances may
cloud implementation efforts, or results may not be
reframed for different settings.
Binder et al., 2015;
Clark, van Kerkhoff, et
al., 2016; Hart &
Calhoun, 2010; Lang
et al., 2012; Polk,
2014
This paper analyzes how transdisciplinary research can facilitate action by analyzing the creation
of a new market-based mechanism for conserving vernal pool ecosystems in Maine, USA (Removed for
review). We demonstrate that knowledge was co-produced, and then we ask (1) Was the co-produced
7. 6
knowledge used in developing a solution in this case; and (2) If so, how did the transdisciplinary process
overcome the four common challenges to using co-produced knowledge? Our case contributes to the
growing body of inquiry in sustainability science that assesses the on-the-ground challenges and
successes of linking knowledge to action in transdisciplinary research as applied to land-use planning
and policy.
Case Study Context
This research focuses on a transdisciplinary effort to create a new instrument for conserving
vernal pools at the municipal scale in Maine, USA. Vernal pools in the northeastern United States are
ephemeral wetlands that provide breeding habitat to amphibian and invertebrate species adapted to
life in fishless, temporary waters, resting or foraging habitat to a suite of other species, and ecosystem
system functions related to hydrology, water quality and biogeochemical processes (Calhoun et al.,
2017; Calhoun & deMaynadier, 2008; Colburn, Weeks, & Reed, 2008; Golden et al., 2017). The role of
vernal pools in maintaining thriving amphibian populations depends on the quality of their connectivity
to neighboring post-breeding terrestrial habitats and other wetlands. Therefore, not only are vernal
pools themselves at high risk of loss or degradation from development, but pool ecosystem functions,
including wildlife habitat for other species and energy flow from wetlands to uplands, can be
compromised by landscape fragmentation (Baldwin & deMaynadier, 2009; Cohen et al., 2016).
Approximately 94% of Maine’s land area is privately owned (LeVert, 2008), so private landowner actions
can have significant impacts on vernal pool ecosystems in this region.
Existing vernal pool regulations are standards that apply equally to all landowners whose vernal
pools meet specific criteria. In New England, the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) reviews development
around vernal pools on properties where waters of the US will be dredged or filled. In addition, the State
of Maine regulates land conversions within 250 feet of a subset of exemplary vernal pools. While these
regulations provide a minimal level of protection to a resource that was traditionally overlooked, they
8. 7
have ecological, economic and social shortcomings. They will likely fail to conserve the functional
integrity of vernal pool ecosystems as terrestrial and wetland connectivity is increasingly fragmented
(Baldwin & deMaynadier, 2009; Bauer, Paton, & Swallow, 2010; Aram J. K. Calhoun et al., 2014;
Freeman, Bell, Calhoun, & Loftin, 2012). Furthermore, Maine regulations currently regulate fewer than
25% of all vernal pools documented in the state vernal pool database (P.deMaynadier, Maine
Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife pers. comm.). Additionally, some landowners feel unduly
burdened by their reduced development options (Jansujwicz, Calhoun, & Lilieholm, 2013), and some
town planning staff report that proposed development projects in designated growth areas were
withdrawn due to vernal pool regulations, resulting in the loss of valuable economic development.
These conflicting views led to a highly contentious political context surrounding vernal pool regulations
(Levesque et al., 2017). For more information about vernal pool ecology and regulations, see
http://www.vernalpools.me/.
Vernal pool conservation efforts highlight tensions between the protection of public goods and
the rights of property owners, a tendency to focus on individual projects rather than cumulative impacts
and landscape-scale processes, a multi-layered and fragmented regulatory system, and a lack of
consideration of how future build-out scenarios could affect ecosystems. Thus, the difficulties associated
with vernal pool conservation are representative of other planning challenges involving natural resource
regulation on private land (Bauer, Bell, Nelson, & Calhoun, 2017; Calhoun et al., 2014; Quinn & Wood,
2017; Shogren, 2005).
To address the regulatory and land-use planning challenges associated with vernal pools, the
authors of this paper engaged key stakeholders to discuss and develop alternative vernal pool mitigation
strategies from 2010 through 2017 (for more details of the context and process, see Removed for
review). Approximately 25 individuals representing two municipalities, four state agencies, three federal
agencies, two land trusts, development and real estate interests, private consultants, and university
9. 8
researchers actively participated in the development of an alternative mechanism for conserving vernal
pools at the municipal scale. All three authors per were active participants in this project. (Name
redacted for review) was a doctoral student and former town natural resources planner and conducted
the policy simulation reported in this paper. (Name redacted for review) served as a coordinator of, as
well as a wetland ecologist expert in the project, and (Name redacted for review) oversaw much of the
economic analysis and engagement with the development community. The following is a brief summary
of the three phases of the transdisciplinary process used to develop a new mechanism for conserving
vernal pools.
Phase 1: Group creation and problem definition
The stakeholders met regularly over the course of six years in large group meetings to discuss
and develop the new mechanism, as well as in smaller subgroups that formed as needed (Table 2).
These meetings occurred throughout the project region, primarily at town halls and state office
buildings. The first meeting was organized by a researcher and included state and federal regulators and
a municipal representative – for a total of 7 participants. There were 21 meetings in the first two years
(both full and sub-group meetings), with new participants invited to 15 of those meetings; in other
words, the first two years were characterized by a continual expansion of the group as new perspectives
and types of knowledge were needed. For example, some of the early meetings focused on bringing in
more municipal representatives because it was recognized that their on-the-ground knowledge as well
as their political will would be essential to creating a municipal-scale policy mechanism. Similarly,
towards the end of the second year, a group of developers were brought into the process when the
group realized that their experience with existing regulations and reaction to proposed concepts was
missing. The first two years were also characterized by a focus on (re)defining the scope of the problem
and embracing a common goal (e.g., deciding to tackle only vernal pools and not on other resources;
10. 9
focusing on the municipal-scale). At the same time, the group was discussing different possible solutions
and gathering initial information needed to explore those options.
Table 2: Transdisciplinary research phases of the vernal pool regulatory mechanism process
Phase
1
Phase
2
Phase
3
Year New
partners
added
Primary outcomes
2010 9 • Expanded stakeholder group
• Identified problems
• Explored many possibly policy solutions
2011 10 • Built trust & shared language in expanding group
• Established subgroups
• Identified economic and ecological data needs
• Conducted initial research
• Narrowed down possible policy mechanisms.
• Some strong debates over details
2012 4 • Subgroups created detailed information
• Drafted initial details of policy mechanism
• Outlined the SAMP
2013 3 • Small groups provided focused contributions to
specific aspects of the new mechanism
• Policy decisions made and new details discussed
• Wrote SAMP as details were determined
2014 • Full policy simulation results reported and revised
• Revisited some decisions & new decisions made
• Discussed actions needed at town, state and federal
levels to implement mechanism
2015-
2016
• Draft SAMP finalized, reviewed & revised
• SAMP adopted September 2016.
• Identified implementation steps at town and state
levels
2017 • Focused efforts to facilitate town implementation
• Applied for new funding for implementation
• Educated staff at partner organizations about SAMP
Phase 2: Co-production of knowledge
As the process progressed, more effort was spent on gathering information needed to create a
new policy mechanism. This work was often completed by the subgroups, a "divide and bring back
11. 10
together" approach that allowed experts to resolve internal differences within subgroups and report
unanimously supported information to the larger group for deliberation. For example, developers and
economists worked together to explore financial implications of existing and proposed regulations,
while biologists and regulators met to identify the essential ecological conditions for conserving vernal
pool systems while meeting the missions of state and federal regulatory agencies. Other times,
individual group members would prepare information for presentation and discussion with the larger
group. For example, an appraiser carried out a mock appraisal of a property with and without a vernal
pool, which the larger group used to explore ways to implement an impact fee.
This paper focuses on a policy simulation effort that emerged from within the collaborative
process. The group desired an incentive-based instrument tailored to the specific ecological and
economic conditions of the individual municipalities that adopt it. As they discussed what a new
mechanism would look like, questions regarding its feasibility and likely outcomes as compared to
existing regulations emerged. In response to these questions, we simulated economic and ecological
outcomes of the existing federal and state regulations and of the proposed market-based mitigation
mechanism in two Maine municipalities. We completed a series of simulations, iteratively providing
results to get feedback for refining the simulations and asking participants for what additional
information would be salient. When presenting simulation results, we openly discussed their limitations
such as the limited availability of detailed municipal-scale and vernal pool data, and the challenges of
predicting future conservation costs.
The simulations suggested that that the proposed market-based mechanism would incur greater
total costs than the existing vernal pool regulations. However, under the proposed market mechanism,
both the estimated landowner costs and governmental administrative costs were lower as compared to
the existing regulations, while land trusts took on new and substantial costs of negotiating, purchasing
and managing conservation easements. The simulations also indicated that in both municipalities, a
12. 11
much larger area of higher quality amphibian habitat would be protected (in perpetuity) under the
market mechanism as compared to the existing vernal pool regulations. However, in our analysis, there
were not enough pre-identified mapped vernal pools and surrounding mitigation land in the rural area
to meet the specified criteria to mitigate for the loss of growth area vernal pools in either town. Lastly,
our policy simulations consistently raised questions about the ability of the impact fees set by to group
to cover the costs of mitigation.
Phase 3: Applying co-produced knowledge
The result of this transdisciplinary process was new policy action: A Vernal Pool Special Area
Management Plan (SAMP) that enabled the ACOE and the State of Maine to allow municipalities to use
the new mechanism if the municipalities met a list of criteria (see the SAMP for details
http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/Vernal-Pools/). The SAMP underwent public
review and public comment in March 2016 before being revised and adopted in September 2016. As of
spring 2018, one municipality had adopted the necessary local ordinances and state regulatory
delegation to implement this mechanism, and another is in the process of doing so.
Methods
In this transdisciplinary process, we interacted fully with the broader stakeholder group and
were engaged in the process from problem definition to policy creation (Brandt et al., 2013; Wiek et al.,
2012). We employ a qualitative case study approach to explore how co-produced knowledge was used
to shape a new land use policy (Yin, 2009). Case study methodology can be most effective when used to
deeply explore contextual details, while employing transparent analytical methods and theoretical
approaches (Corcoran et al., 2004). We relied on two data sources within our case study: documents
and participant observation field notes. We maintained electronic files of the documents created and
13. 12
used during the process, including all versions of the draft vernal pool protection mechanism. We also
took detailed notes during and after meetings of the collaborative group that record what happened
and our reflections on the process.
While there were many types of knowledge created during this multiyear process, this paper
focuses on the policy simulation exercise conducted to compare potential ecological and economic
outcomes of the proposed policy mechanism to the existing regulations. Our analysis for this paper
includes a comparative assessment of the text of the draft proposed mechanism at the time of the
policy simulation to the final version of the mechanism that went out for public comment in March 2016
in order to identify major modifications in the policy mechanism. We then assessed the major
modifications for linkages to specific results of the policy simulations discussed by the larger group (and
recorded in our field notes.) To analyze our participant observation notes, we identified text related to
information creation, simulation results, interpretation and discussion of results, and policy formulation,
and we categorized this text into themes. Our themes were informed by the transdisciplinary research
and knowledge-to-action literature, and were used to identify factors that enabled the group to use
simulation results in new policy creation. The on-the-ground process discussed in this paper was not
informed by the literature at the time of the project; it is only in retrospect that we explore and apply
theoretical concepts to the process in which we were engaged.
3. Results
We found that the co-produced policy simulation information shaped the details of the final
vernal pool policy mechanism. There are several substantive differences between the draft vernal pool
conservation mechanism and the final version that went out for public comment in the Federal Register
in March 2016 which are attributable to the knowledge that developed during policy simulations. First,
in recognition of the increased administrative costs to land trusts for the negotiation, purchase, and
14. 13
monitoring of vernal pool conservation easements, the final mechanism allows for a trust to use up to
10% of collected impact fees to cover project implementation. Second, since mitigation options were
found to be limited within the municipality where vernal pools are impacted, the final mechanism
provides an option for conservation funds to be applied, in order of preference, within the rural areas of
town where impacts occurred, within the rural areas of adjacent towns that meet specific criteria, and
within the geographic area of interest for the land trust (or other third party) administering the funds.
Third, because simulation results suggested that the impact fee desired by some group members would
not cover the costs of required mitigation, the impact fee in the final mechanism was higher than what
was initially proposed, and the SAMP articulates an annual review of conservation deals to assess and
alter, if necessary, future impact fees.
Factors that facilitated linking knowledge to action
We explored the aspects of the transdisciplinary research process that facilitated use of co-
produced knowledge in policy development. Our results fall into four primary themes: a culture of
learning, policy simulations as co-produced boundary objects, integrating research into solution
development, and an adaptive, iterative management approach.
Culture of learning. This process was characterized by a culture of learning in which both
researcher and stakeholder knowledge was equally sought-after, valued and incorporated into new
policy. One of the key features of this case is that new partners were engaged as new knowledge or
perspectives were needed. For example, developers were invited to participate, and they worked in a
subgroup in tandem with university economists and municipal economic development professionals to
compile information, debate results and present consensus ideas to the larger group.
This example supports a finding of a culture of learning in multiple ways. Stakeholder knowledge
(developers and municipal officials) was valued equally with researcher-provided data. Even though the
15. 14
addition of new members slowed the process (as new members learned terminology, questioned the
problem definition, built trust), the ethos of the group was to embrace new knowledge and
perspectives. Subgroups provided an opportunity for the in-depth examination of detailed data and
dissent about their meaning within a focused, safe environment. Lastly, when sub-group ideas were
brought back to the full group, they were discussed in relation to their application to the new policy
mechanism, providing an opportunity for others in the group to learn and actively debate how to tailor
the mechanism. While not always a smooth process, these give-and-take conversations were infused
with a desire to understand each other’s information and build upon it.
One additional benefit of the culture of learning in this project was that participants reported
feeling valued for their contributions, which helped maintain momentum in a multi-year process.
Participants’ direct involvement in developing knowledge in subgroups and incrementally developing a
new mechanism as a large group helped keep participants engaged, along with more traditional
measures such as regular meetings with food, email updates and ground rules that engendered respect.
Policy simulations as co-produced boundary objects. The simulations of future conditions under
existing and proposed vernal pool regulations provided more than new knowledge. Notably, the
simulations were co-produced; by their very nature, they required information from both academics
(e.g., vernal pool ecological data, economic modeling) and non-academics (e.g., municipal zoning,
developer financial information). Additionally, because modeling of future scenarios requires making
some assumptions and is based on incomplete data, many decisions were made (e.g., preferred
characteristics of properties to conserve) through group discussions.
Further, the simulations were conducted in multiple rounds of increasing complexity, with
discussion about their meaning, usefulness, and suggestions for improvements. In these deliberations,
the simulations results (in the form of maps, tables and presentations) provided a common touch stone
for everyone to conceptualize the problem and related issues. For example, one of the problems with
16. 15
the existing regulations is that they may hinder development in areas where municipalities want to
promote growth, driving those developments either to another more rural site (creating sprawl) or to
other towns (losing local tax revenue). While this problem was one of the original reasons for a wide
range of participants to join this project, because the simulations required a specific delineation of
where these growth areas would be in each town, they became a way for the group members to hash
out what they were really concerned about and to float ideas about how to design the new mechanism
to address the refined problem. Hence, the simulations themselves acted as boundary objects that
allowed participants from different perspectives to describe the problems through their own lens while
also being able to create a joint conceptualization of the project (Clark, Tomich, et al., 2016).
Integrating research into solution development. The collaborative group started brainstorming
possible solutions to the identified problems in the earliest meetings. The initial conceptualization of
solutions then drove the development of new knowledge. In the first couple of years, that new
knowledge was the compilation of existing information: stories exemplifying the problem; examples of
innovative policy solutions; maps of known vernal pool locations. As the new mechanism was further
developed, more specific new knowledge was needed. The policy simulations, for example, were
developed in response to questions about how outcomes of the proposed mechanism would compare
to existing regulations.
Information production was part of a cyclical process of coming up with solution options,
compiling or creating information that would help advance the development of the solution, further
refining of the proposed mechanism based on deliberation of the new knowledge, and so on. Further,
because there was a continual focus on developing a solution, researchers themselves were embedded
into the decision-making process so that they were engaged in discussions about needed information
and about how new knowledge could be applied to the policy. For example, economists on the team
conducted a follow-up sensitivity analysis of more than 1,000 scenarios to provide additional
17. 16
information to the group about likely outcomes of the proposed mechanism that they could use when
refining the policy.
Thus, the process of applying co-produced knowledge to creating a new solution was an
iterative, on-going practice rather than something that happened at the end of the process. The
research and knowledge co-production pieces were intimately tied to and embedded in a specific policy
development effort. With this foundation, the project leads remained involved in facilitating
implementation as the final step of the process.
Adaptive management approach. This transdisciplinary research process incorporated adaptive
management strategies within its operation as well as within the final solution that was adopted. Policy
development occurred over multiple years, during which knowledge production itself evolved as new
perspectives emerged. Further, even though policy solutions were discussed early on, the group
remained open to adjusting aspects that they felt could be improved. When stumbling blocks arose, the
group brainstormed options, debated controversial issues and found ways to compromise when
needed. For example, there were points in the process when it was unclear how the manage the fact
that different regulatory vehicles exist at municipal, state and federal levels, and there were not obvious
ways to allow them to work together. The collaborative group responded by discussing options and
adapting the proposed solution to meet the needs of each agency. Several factors likely enabled this
adaptive approach: there were participants from each level of governance that had participated since
the conception of the project and had committed to its success; the project coordinator created an
atmosphere of problem-solving and experimentation; and trust and power sharing had developed
among group members to the level that they were willing to compromise and to support the proposal
despite uncertainty (Removed for review).
Furthermore, the new mechanism incorporated two key adaptive management features: a
monitoring system to keep track of progress and a provision to review local outcomes annually and
18. 17
project outcomes in five years to determine whether to continue, revise or discontinue the mechanism.
Given the uncertainty in both the economic and ecological outcomes of the proposed mechanism, the
fact that the policy would be reviewed within these two timeframes allowed group members to move
forward in applying co-produced but inherently limited knowledge to solution-creation. This learning-by-
doing approach mirrored the iterative process of developing the new mechanism, and built into the
program an opportunity for reflection and revision.
4. Discussion
In this study, we explored a transdisciplinary research process to develop an alternative land use
mitigation mechanism for conserving vernal pool systems while enabling growth area development. We
found that specific knowledge co-produced during the process was used in shaping the final policy
mechanism. We identified four key characteristics of this process that address the known challenges of
linking new co-produced knowledge to action: creating a culture of learning, policy simulations as
boundary objects, integrating research into solution development, and an adaptive management
approach (Table 3).
When a culture of learning pervades a transdisciplinary research project, participants are freed
from the need to know and to be experts, and can share and learn from each other. We call it a culture
of learning to stress the idea that the learning needs to go beyond a cursory exercise or formal
presentation of material. These results support Clark et al. (2016) who state that individual researchers
should focus on learning, not knowing, and thus shift from an individualistic, competitive stance to an
integrative, cooperative one. We build on this by suggesting it is not just the researchers who benefit
from this shift, but all participants. It was just as helpful for the developers in the room to learn why the
ecologists were excited about the annual amphibian “Big Night” migration to breeding pools, as it was
for the economists to learn how the towns assign property values. Similarly, Clark et al. (2016) discuss
19. 18
the importance of universities and other organizations to be safe spaces that reward experimentation
that promotes social learning. While this remains as essential, we show that the transdisciplinary
approach itself can also be designed to be a safe space that encourages learning from each other, and
allowing for the integrated knowledge that is necessary to connect the new knowledge to action.
Table 3: Ways in which the vernal pool transdisciplinary approach addressed major challenges in
connecting knowledge to action
Challenge Strategies used to address challenge
Integrated
knowledge
A culture of learning valued and integrated multiple types of academic and
non-academic knowledge. Small workgroups provided a forum for the
exploration and synthesis of in-depth knowledge. Deliberative processes in
large groups ensured participants shared information as well as worked to
understand, synthesize and assimilate others’ perspectives and information.
Joint mental models The policy simulations became co-produced boundary objects that
incorporated information and feedback from all participants and that
provided a common object with which they could understand the entirety of
the problem and see their own perspective reflected. The co-production
process used built upon the trust, shared power, and social learning that had
been fostered in the collaborative group.
Explicit link between
new knowledge and
specific decision
Research was directly integrated into solution development from the earliest
stages of the transdisciplinary process. The very debates over the details
about the proposed solution helped the group stay focused on compiling and
analyzing relevant information. Rather than creating a link between new
information and a possible solution at the end of the process, the translation
of knowledge into policy action was incorporated from the beginning.
Legitimate solutions An adaptive management approach allowed for iterative ground-truthing of
the viability and legitimacy of the proposed mechanism for each party
involved in implementation. Including both the regulated and the regulators
equally in generating the solution helped reduce power imbalances.
Additionally, there were explicit discussions about what tools could be
utilized at each level of governance. The solution itself incorporated adaptive
management provisions, to encourage improvement over time and manage
uncertainty.
Our finding that the policy simulations acted as boundary objects addresses the challenge of
having a diverse group find common ground and joint mental models. The boundary work literature is
rich with examples of how objects can provide these joint models (see for example (Cash et al., 2003;
Clark, Tomich, et al., 2016; Guston, 2001; Kirchhoff, Carmen Lemos, & Dessai, 2013). In this case, there
20. 19
was no explicit boundary organization or overt attempt to create a boundary object. However, due to
the intense co-production of the policy simulations, with input of data from many participants and
multiple opportunities to discuss the meaning of results, the simulations became a touchstone around
which participants could discuss their particular concerns and debate policy aspects. Prior to the actual
SAMP being written that spelled out the details of the new mechanism, the policy simulations (as
associated maps and tables) acted as representations of the proposed solution and allowed the type of
shared understanding that is necessary for creating concrete refinements.
Drawing on the framework created by Clark et al. (Clark, Tomich, et al., 2016), the source
knowledge in this case was multiple communities of expertise (versus a single expert) for the purpose of
negotiating a new solution. Clark et al. suggest that the boundary work or object must be salient,
credible and legitimate to aid in a negotiation process. We found that policy simulations were salient;
they responded directly to requests for this information. They were credible; the simulations
incorporated data from all members, the limitations were discussed and not glossed over, and the group
had developed trust for each other and the process. Finally, the simulations were considered legitimate,
unbiased representations of the policy outcomes. This legitimacy was partly established through a
transparent and iterative process in which participants could understand how maps and figures were
created.
Rather than creating a link between new information and a possible solution at the end of the
process, the translation of knowledge into policy action was incorporated throughout this
transdisciplinary process, within recursive loops. By revising the policy as knowledge emerged during the
transdisciplinary research process, members came to expect and ensure that new information and
perspectives would continue to inform policy creation. Information was produced for the explicit
purpose of refining a proposed solution: whether it was the policy simulation on which we focused in
this paper, or other new information such the mock appraisal that tested whether an impact fee based
21. 20
on appraised values could work. At the same time, project leaders remained engaged throughout the
final steps of getting the SAMP approved and actively facilitating implementation at the local level, not
withdrawing after the ‘research’ components were complete. We suggest that, in practice, the three
phases of transdisciplinary research should ideally overlap and interact with each other. Thus, our
results support van Kerkoff and Lebel (2006) who suggest that knowledge connects to action within an
arena of interaction. When the relationship between co-produced knowledge and action is understood
as an arena (as opposed to a linear link), there is room to explore the myriad factors that encourage
action throughout transdisciplinary research processes (van Kerkhoff & Lebel, 2006).
An adaptive management approach also linked knowledge to action, both by providing a tool for
managing uncertainty (Jacobs et al., 2016) and by ensuring the solution would be legitimate in specific
decision arenas. Simulating complex human behavior using regression models has limitations, and
although our simulation used the best available data, was adjusted to address stakeholder questions,
and was followed with subsequent rounds of modeling, results were still uncertain. Others have
suggested that uncertainty and risk in market mechanisms can affect the implementation of such
instruments (BenDor, 2009; BenDor, Riggsbee, & Doyle, 2011). While it remains to be seen how
uncertainty will affect policy implementation in this instance, the awareness that the new mechanism
would be monitored, reviewed, and adjusted allowed skeptics to support the policy and facilitated the
acceptance of the policy within the necessary local, state and federal entities. Further, the review
requirements built into the mechanism itself helped individual stakeholders when they returned to their
respective spheres (e.g. municipal governments, state and federal regulator agencies) to convince their
peers of the ability to revise the mechanism in the near future if deemed ineffective; this helped these
actors demonstrate the legitimacy of the new mechanism in their own spaces.
5. Conclusion: A Way Forward
22. 21
In this case, we identified four aspects of the process that helped overcome common challenges
to acting upon new information. We suggest that, at least in some cases, embedding knowledge
creation within and throughout an on-going effort to seek and develop solutions is an essential
ingredient. Within this arena of interaction, instilling a culture of learning, co-produced boundary
objects, and an adaptive management approach will further facilitate the use of new knowledge. It was
not our intent to do a full analysis of the transdisciplinary process, nor have we fully analyzed the many
challenges along the way, such as how the group maintained momentum over such a long time frame.
Rather, we were interested in pulling out key features of a specific case that could provide insight into
the ways in which knowledge facilitates action. Although there may not be many documented analyses
of what facilitates the use of co-produced knowledge in developing solutions, it is likely that there are
many projects in which this transfer occurs, in which different approaches may address the known
challenges to linking knowledge with action. With an increased focus on identifying the key factors that
enable acting on solutions, we can develop the same level of nuanced theoretical concepts currently
characterizing the earlier phases of transdisciplinary research, and the practical advice for deliberately
designing these efforts.
References
Baldwin, R. F., & deMaynadier, P. G. (2009). Assessing threats to pool-breeding amphibian habitat in an
urbanizing landscape. Biological Conservation, 142(8), 1628–1638.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.039
Bauer, D. M., Bell, K. P., Nelson, E. J., & Calhoun, A. J. K. (2017). Managing small natural features: A
synthesis of economic issues and emergent opportunities. Biological Conservation, 211, 80–87.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.01.001
Bauer, D. M., Paton, P. W. C., & Swallow, S. K. (2010). Are wetland regulations cost effective for species
protection? A case study of amphibian metapopulations. Ecological Applications, 20(3), 798–815.
Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20437965
Beeton, R. J. S., & Lynch, A. J. J. (2012). Most of nature: A framework to resolve the twin dilemmas of the
decline of nature and rural communities. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 45–56.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.009
BenDor, T. K. (2009). A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss
23. 22
policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 89(1–2), 17–27.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.09.003
BenDor, T. K., Riggsbee, J. A., & Doyle, M. (2011). Risk and markets for ecosystem services.
Environmental Science & Technology, 45(24), 10322–30. http://doi.org/10.1021/es203201n
Binder, C. R., Absenger-Helmli, I., & Schilling, T. (2015). The reality of transdisciplinarity: a framework-
based self-reflection from science and practice leaders. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 545–562.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0328-2
Blackstock, K. L., Kelly, G. J., & Horsey, B. L. (2007). Developing and applying a framework to evaluate
participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 60(4), 726–742.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.014
Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., … Von Wehrden, H. (2013). A review of
transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1–15.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
Brody, S. D., Highfield, W., & Carrasco, V. (2004). Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local
jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida. Landscape and Urban Planning,
69(1), 33–50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.09.002
Buizer, J., Jacobs, K., & Cash, D. W. (2016). Making short-term climate forecasts useful: Linking science
and action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
113(17), 4597–4602. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900518107
Calhoun, A. J. K., & deMaynadier, P. G. (2008). Science and conservation of vernal pools. Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press.
Calhoun, A. J. K., Jansujwicz, J. S., Bell, K. P., & Hunter, M. L. (2014). Improving management of small
natural features on private lands by negotiating the science-policy boundary for Maine vernal
pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(30),
11002–11006. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323606111
Calhoun, A. J. K., Mushet, D. M., Alexander, L. C., DeKeyser, E. S., Fowler, L., Lane, C. R., … Walls, S. C.
(2017). The Significant Surface-Water Connectivity of “Geographically Isolated Wetlands.”
Wetlands. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0887-3
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., … Mitchell, R. B. (2003).
Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8086–8091.
http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011602108
Clark, W. C. (2007). Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, 104(6), 1737–8. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611291104
Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: the emerging research program.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8059–
61. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D. H., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E.
(2016). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(7), 4615–4622.
http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900231108
Clark, W. C., van Kerkhoff, L., Lebel, L., & Gallopin, G. C. (2016). Crafting usable knowledge for
24. 23
sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4570–4578.
http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601266113
Cohen, M. J., Creed, I. F., Alexander, L., Basu, N. B., Calhoun, A. J. K., Craft, C., … Walls, S. C. (2016). Do
geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions? Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(8), 1–9.
http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512650113
Colburn, E., Weeks, S. C., & Reed, S. K. (2008). Diversity and ecology of vernal pool invertebrates. In A. J.
K. Calhoun & P. G. DeMaynadier (Eds.), Science and Conservation of Vernal Pools in Northeastern
North America (pp. 107–124). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Corcoran, P.B., Walker, K.E. and Wals, A.E.J. (2004), “Case studies, make‐your‐case studies, and case
stories: a critique of case‐study methodology in sustainability in higher education”, Environmental
Education Research, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 7–21.
Dilling, L., & Lemos, M. C. (2011). Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate
knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 680–
689. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
Doremus, H. (2003). A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands.
Environmental Science & Policy, 6(3), 217–232. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00036-4
Feiock, R. C., Tavares, A. F., & Lubell, M. N. (2008). Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management
and Land Use Regulation. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 461–480. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-
0072.2008.00277.x
Freeman, R. C., Bell, K. P., Calhoun, A. J. K., & Loftin, C. S. (2012). Incorporating Economic Models into
Seasonal Pool Conservation Planning. Wetlands, 32(3), 509–520. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-
012-0284-x
Gerber, J.-D., & Rissman, A. R. (2012). Land-conservation strategies: the dynamic relationship between
acquisition and land-use planning. Environment and Planning A, 44(8), 1836–1855.
http://doi.org/10.1068/a44395
Godemann, J. (2008). Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation.
Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 625–641. http://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802469188
Golden, H. E., Creed, I. F., Ali, G., Basu, N. B., Neff, B. P., Rains, M. C., … Lang, M. (2017). Integrating
geographically isolated wetlands into land management decisions. Frontiers in Ecology and the
Environment. http://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1504
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction.
Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.
http://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600401
Harris, F., & Lyon, F. (2013). Transdisciplinary environmental research: Building trust across professional
cultures. Environmental Science and Policy, 31, 109–119.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.02.006
Hart, D. D., & Calhoun, A. J. K. (2010). Rethinking the role of ecological research in the sustainable
management of freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 55, 258–269.
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02370.x
Hockenstein, J. B., Stavins, R. N., & Whitehead, B. W. (1997). Crafting the Next Generation of Market-
Based Environmental Tools. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 39(4),
12–33. http://doi.org/10.1080/00139159709603637
25. 24
Hunter, M. L. (2005). A Mesofilter Conservation Strategy to Complement Fine and Coarse Filters.
Conservation Biology, 19(4), 1025–1029. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00172.x
Irwin, E. G., Bell, K. P., & Geoghegan, J. (2003). Modeling and managing urban growth at the rural-urban
fringe: A parcel-level model of residential land use change. Agricultural and Resource Economics
Review, 32(1), 83–102.
Jacobs, K., Lebel, L., Buizer, J., Addams, L., Matson, P., McCullough, E., … Finan, T. (2016). Linking
knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 4591–4596.
http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813125107
Jansujwicz, J. S., Calhoun, A. J. K., & Lilieholm, R. J. (2013). The Maine Vernal Pool Mapping and
Assessment Program: Engaging Municipal Officials and Private Landowners in Community-Based
Citizen Science. Environmental Management, 52(6), 1369–1385. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-
013-0168-8
Kirchhoff, C. J., Carmen Lemos, M., & Dessai, S. (2013). Actionable Knowledge for Environmental
Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science. Annual Review of Environment and
Resources, 38(1), 393–414. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-022112-112828
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., … Thomas, C. J. (2012).
Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges.
Sustainability Science, 7(SUPPL. 1), 25–43. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
LeVert, M. (2008). Public Access to Maine’s Private Lands: A Cultural and Economic Asset. Montana The
Magazine Of Western History.
Levesque, V. R., Bell, K. P., & Calhoun, A. J. K. (2017). Planning for Sustainability in Small Municipalities:
The Influence of Interest Groups, Growth Patterns, and Institutional Characteristics. Journal of
Planning Education and Research, 37(3). http://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16655601
Levesque, V. R., Calhoun, A. J. K., Bell, K. P., & Johnson, T. R. (2017). Turning Contention into
Collaboration: Engaging Power, Trust, and Learning in Collaborative Networks. Society & Natural
Resources, 1920(May), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1180726
Maiello, A., Battaglia, M., Daddi, T., & Frey, M. (2011). Urban sustainability and knowledge: Theoretical
heterogeneity and the need of a transdisciplinary framework. A tale of four towns. Futures, 43(10),
1164–1174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.08.011
McCullough, E., & Matson, P. (2012). Linking Knowledge with Action for Sustainable Development: A
Case Study of Change and Effectiveness. In P. Matson (Ed.), Seeds of Sustainability (pp. 63–82).
Washington D.C.: Island Press.
McGreavy, B., Calhoun, A. J. K., Jansujwicz, J., & Levesque, V. R. (2016). Citizen science and natural
resource governance: program design for vernal pool policy innovation. Ecology And Society, 21(2),
48.
McKee, A., Guimaraes, M. H., & Pinto-Correia, T. (2015). Social capital accumulation and the role of the
researcher: An example of a transdisciplinary visioning process for the future of agriculture in
Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 50, 88–99. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.006
Miller, T. R. (2013). Constructing sustainability science: Emerging perspectives and research trajectories.
Sustainability Science, 8(2), 279–293. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6
Miller, T. R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D., Robinson, J., Olsson, L., Kriebel, D., & Loorbach, D. (2014). The future
of sustainability science: A solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustainability Science, 9(2), 239–
26. 25
246. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6
Norton, D. A. (2000). Conservation Biology and Private Land: Shifting the Focus. Conservation Biology,
14(5), 1221–1223.
Paloniemi, R., & Tikka, P. M. (2008). Ecological and social aspects of biodiversity conservation on private
lands. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(4), 336–346.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.11.001
Pirard, R. (2012). Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A lexicon.
Environmental Science & Policy, 19–20, 59–68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.02.001
Polk, M. (2014). Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship
between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 439–
451. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7
Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research
framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110–122.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
Quinn, J. E., & Wood, J. M. (2017). Application of a coupled human natural system framework to
organize and frame challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation on private lands.
Ecology and Society, 22(1), 39. http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09132-220139
Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., & Penker, M. (2015). Managing group processes in transdisciplinary future
studies: How to facilitate social learning and capacity building for self-organised action towards
sustainable urban development? Futures, 65, 57–71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.012
Shogren, J. F. (Ed.). (2005). Species at Risk: Using economic incentives to shelter endangered species on
private lands. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Shortle, J. (2013). Economics and Environmental Markets: Lessons from Water-Quality Trading.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 42(1), 57–74.
Stokes, D. L., Hanson, M. F., Oaks, D. D., Straub, J. E., & Ponio, A. V. (2009). Local Land-Use Planning to
Conserve Biodiversity: Planners’ Perspectives on What Works. Conservation Biology, 24(2), 450–
460. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01356.x
van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development. Annual
Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 445–477.
http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850
van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2015). Coproductive capacities: Rethinking science-governance relations in
a diverse world. Ecology and Society, 20(1). http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07188-200114
Wiek, A., Harlow, J., Melnick, R., van der Leeuw, S., Fukushi, K., Takeuchi, K., … Kutter, R. (2015).
Sustainability science in action: a review of the state of the field through case studies on disaster
recovery, bioenergy, and precautionary purchasing. Sustainability Science, 10(1), 17–31.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0261-9
Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F. S., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to
transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability
Science, 7(SUPPL. 1), 5–24. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y
Wilcove, D. S., & Lee, J. (2004). Using Economic and Regulatory Incentives to Restore Endangered
Species: Lessons Learned from Three New Programs. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 639–645.
Wuelser, G., & Pohl, C. (2016). How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable
27. 26
development: a typology based on grounded theory. Sustainability Science, 1–12.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0363-7
Wyborn, C. A. (2015). Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: Adaptive
governance and connectivity conservation. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 11.
http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06510-200111
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (Fourth). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, Inc. http://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e
Zscheischler, J., & Rogga, S. (2015). Transdisciplinarity in land use science - A review of concepts,
empirical findings and current practices. Futures, 65, 28–44.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005