Analogy
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
1 recomendación•1,303 vistas
Este documento presenta una lista de 10 puntos que van de la letra a hasta la j. Cada punto parece contener una breve sección o idea, pero sin más contexto es difícil determinar el tema general o conclusión del documento.
Denunciar
Compartir
Denunciar
Compartir
Recomendados
Aprende a crear tu gmail
Este documento no contiene ningún contenido para resumir, ya que solo consiste en números sin texto.
Final round
Este documento no contiene ningún contenido para resumir, ya que solo contiene números sin texto o información asociada.
Conv cooper-educ-def en-rev _env(2)
Este documento presenta una guía de 7 pasos para mejorar la comunicación y la colaboración en el trabajo. Los pasos incluyen escuchar activamente, hacer preguntas para comprender diferentes perspectivas, encontrar puntos en común, comprometerse a resolver problemas de manera constructiva, y revisar periódicamente el progreso para garantizar resultados exitosos.
Ejercicios
Este documento contiene una lista de 10 ejercicios sin descripciones. No hay información fundamental o de alto nivel que resumir.
Folleto capacitacion
Este documento no contiene ningún contenido para resumir, ya que solo consiste en números y líneas.
Simbolicamente
El documento presenta un diagrama con cuatro cuadrantes numerados del I al IV, y varias letras de la a a la g distribuidas en los cuadrantes y entre ellos.
Tarea de calculo
Este documento parece estar vacío o no contener información relevante para resumir en 3 oraciones o menos.
Tarea de calculo
Este documento parece estar vacío o no contener información relevante para resumir en 3 oraciones o menos.
Recomendados
Aprende a crear tu gmail
Este documento no contiene ningún contenido para resumir, ya que solo consiste en números sin texto.
Final round
Este documento no contiene ningún contenido para resumir, ya que solo contiene números sin texto o información asociada.
Conv cooper-educ-def en-rev _env(2)
Este documento presenta una guía de 7 pasos para mejorar la comunicación y la colaboración en el trabajo. Los pasos incluyen escuchar activamente, hacer preguntas para comprender diferentes perspectivas, encontrar puntos en común, comprometerse a resolver problemas de manera constructiva, y revisar periódicamente el progreso para garantizar resultados exitosos.
Ejercicios
Este documento contiene una lista de 10 ejercicios sin descripciones. No hay información fundamental o de alto nivel que resumir.
Folleto capacitacion
Este documento no contiene ningún contenido para resumir, ya que solo consiste en números y líneas.
Simbolicamente
El documento presenta un diagrama con cuatro cuadrantes numerados del I al IV, y varias letras de la a a la g distribuidas en los cuadrantes y entre ellos.
Tarea de calculo
Este documento parece estar vacío o no contener información relevante para resumir en 3 oraciones o menos.
Tarea de calculo
Este documento parece estar vacío o no contener información relevante para resumir en 3 oraciones o menos.
Analogies 1-six-types-of-analogies
This document discusses analogies and different types of analogy relationships. It defines an analogy as comparing two pairs of words that are related in the same way. The six types of analogies covered are: synonyms, antonyms, object/action, source/product, part/whole, and animal/habitat. Examples of each type are provided and analogy problems are worked through with explanations.
Analogies
This document provides examples of analogies to demonstrate how they work. An analogy shows a relationship between two pairs of words. The first example shows that grass is green, so the sky, like grass, is blue. More analogies are given comparing different objects and their related words, such as milk to glass and soup to bowl. The document aims to illustrate analogies through multiple examples of pairs of words that have something in common.
Analogy
- An analogy compares two concepts to explain an unfamiliar idea by drawing parallels between them. It can be used as a type of argument or figure of speech like a simile or metaphor.
- Jodi Picoult uses the analogy of a burning building to represent the threat of death, with the mother willing to risk her own life to save her child, just as the character sends her child into danger to save another.
- John Green compares being trapped in life's decisions to being lost in a labyrinth, with people imagining escaping it through an idealized future, just as the character feels trapped in her present circumstances.
Analogy type of test.pptx ( new )
The document discusses analogy tests, which measure reasoning ability through comparisons of relationships between pairs of words. It defines analogy tests and outlines various types of relationships that can be tested, such as word meanings, categories, causes and effects. Examples of analogy questions are provided to illustrate different relationship types, along with guidance on constructing effective analogy tests.
Analogies notes
The document outlines different types of semantic relationships that can exist between words including action-object relationships, synonyms, antonyms, location, part-whole, classification, function, cause-effect, degree, characteristic-quality, performer-action, and performer-object. Examples are provided for each relationship type to illustrate how two words can be semantically related in different ways. The relationships can be used to understand how the meanings of words are connected to each other.
Analogies Ppt
The document discusses analogies and their crucial or decisive parts. It provides examples of analogies and asks which part is most important. For the analogy of a nut and its kernel, the kernel is identified as the most vital part. Another analogy example provided is a picture and its frame, asking which surrounds the other. Both a ring surrounding a finger and a fence surrounding a yard seem to fit, but upon further reflection, a frame borders a picture and a fence borders a yard, making fence:yard the logical match.
Analogy type of test.pptx ( new )
The document discusses analogy tests, which measure reasoning ability through comparisons of relationships between pairs of words. It defines analogy tests and outlines several types of relationships that can be tested, such as word meanings, categories, causes and effects. Examples of analogy questions are provided to illustrate each relationship type. Suggestions are made for constructing effective analogy tests, such as using parallel language and ensuring distractors are plausible.
Phrase modifier swma
The document provides examples of phrases and clauses and asks the reader to identify whether a set of words is a phrase or clause. It then provides examples of participial phrases and infinitive phrases, explaining their functions. It provides exercises for the reader to identify and modify nouns with participial and infinitive phrases.
Argument from analogy
Arguments based on analogies often overlook important differences between the two things being compared. Examples are provided that use analogies in absurd ways by drawing comparisons between unrelated things like a person growing on another like a bacterial colony or having a perfectly oval face shaped like a circle compressed by an exercise device. A further example is given of being as lame as a duck that was literally lame from stepping on a land mine.
Analogies (level 2)
This document contains a series of analogy questions with multiple choice answers. Each question provides two terms and asks the reader to select another pair of terms that best illustrates the same relationship. The analogies cover a wide range of everyday topics including objects, foods, locations, functions, and characteristics.
Apraising analogical argument
Analogical arguments claim that a conclusion is probable based on similarities between two or more things. To evaluate the strength of an analogical argument, six criteria are used: 1) the number of similar entities or cases in the premises, 2) the variety of those cases, 3) the number of similar respects between the cases, 4) the relevance of those respects, 5) any dissimilarities between the cases, and 6) how modest the conclusion's claim is based on the premises. Arguments are stronger when they have more entities, a variety of cases, many relevant similar respects, few dissimilarities, and more modest conclusions.
Chapter six
This document discusses inductive arguments. It defines inductive arguments as those whose premises provide evidence for but do not guarantee the conclusion. It then examines 4 types of inductive arguments: enumerative induction, statistical syllogism, causal argument, and analogy. It provides examples of each type and criteria for evaluating the reliability and strength of inductive arguments.
Logic
Logic is the study of reasoning and correct thinking. It involves analyzing concepts, establishing general laws of
truth, and determining valid forms of argument. Logic is applicable to all fields as it provides standards for
consistent and evidence-based reasoning. It has wide scope and helps with social studies, engineering, mathematics,
science, and computer programming through modeling reality, simplifying complex problems, and representing
information processing in a logical way. Studying logic is important as it helps develop critical thinking skills
needed to make rational decisions, adapt to new situations, and form justifiable beliefs.
Introduction to Logic
- Philosophy began through the natural human process of wondering, as Socrates described. The curious Greeks sought to understand the world through philosophical inquiry.
- Thales was regarded as the first to philosophically articulate the basic substance of the universe, proposing that water or moisture was the fundamental principle of life. This inspired other Greeks to develop new concepts.
- Logic demands that all thinking adhere to rules and guidelines to ensure correctness. It trains the mind and prepares one for further study in other areas.
Judgment and proposition or logical statement
This document discusses judgment, propositions, and logical statements. It defines judgment as a mental act of affirming or denying something, while a proposition is the product of judgment expressed as a statement. Propositions take the form of sentences and can be declarative, interrogative, imperative, or exclamatory. Categorical propositions have a subject, predicate, and copula that relate the subject and predicate. The quality, quantity, and form of propositions are also explained. Hypothetical propositions include conditional statements relating an antecedent and consequent, disjunctive statements presenting alternatives, and conjunctive statements asserting two alternatives cannot be true together. Venn diagrams are introduced to visually represent categorical statements using circles for classes
Logic introduction
This document provides an introduction to logic. It outlines the objectives of studying logic as sharpening intellect, developing learning ability, strengthening understanding, and promoting clear thinking. Key benefits include supporting reasoning powers, distinguishing good from bad arguments, and learning principles of clear thinking. Logic is defined as the study of correct versus incorrect reasoning. Important concepts discussed include premises, propositions, arguments, sound versus unsound arguments, and laws of logic. The overall aim is to learn how to evaluate arguments.
Logic
This document provides an overview of logic, including its definition, methods of reasoning, divisions, and key concepts. Logic is concerned with correct thinking and reasoning. It can be considered both an art that guides reason and a science that investigates and explains laws of thought. There are two main methods of reasoning - inductive, which obtains universal knowledge from particular cases, and deductive, which proceeds from universal to particular. Logic is divided into formal logic, which focuses on correct thinking, and material logic, which studies main philosophical problems in logic. Key concepts explained include terms, propositions, and inference.
Logic arguments and_fallacies
This document defines and discusses different types of arguments and logical fallacies. It begins by defining deductive and inductive arguments, and explaining how to identify them based on language used. Common types of deductive and inductive arguments are then outlined. The document also discusses the concepts of validity, soundness, and strength as they relate to arguments. Finally, it provides detailed descriptions and examples of many common logical fallacies, categorizing them as fallacies of relevance, weak induction, ambiguity, analogy, or formal fallacies.
Logical fallacies powerpoint
This document defines logical fallacies and common types of fallacious arguments. It explains that an argument consists of premises and a conclusion, and fallacies occur when arguments fail in certain ways. Sixteen specific fallacies are described, including hasty generalization, slippery slope, appeal to authority, straw man, and equivocation. The document concludes with tips for preventing fallacious reasoning such as arguing against oneself and fairly characterizing opposing arguments.
Logic Ppt
Here are the specific kinds of supposition for the terms in each proposition:
1. "Tamarao" - Essential supposition
2. "Tamarao" - Material supposition
3. "Pag-asa" - Logical supposition
4. "Pag-asa" - Material supposition
Más contenido relacionado
Destacado
Analogies 1-six-types-of-analogies
This document discusses analogies and different types of analogy relationships. It defines an analogy as comparing two pairs of words that are related in the same way. The six types of analogies covered are: synonyms, antonyms, object/action, source/product, part/whole, and animal/habitat. Examples of each type are provided and analogy problems are worked through with explanations.
Analogies
This document provides examples of analogies to demonstrate how they work. An analogy shows a relationship between two pairs of words. The first example shows that grass is green, so the sky, like grass, is blue. More analogies are given comparing different objects and their related words, such as milk to glass and soup to bowl. The document aims to illustrate analogies through multiple examples of pairs of words that have something in common.
Analogy
- An analogy compares two concepts to explain an unfamiliar idea by drawing parallels between them. It can be used as a type of argument or figure of speech like a simile or metaphor.
- Jodi Picoult uses the analogy of a burning building to represent the threat of death, with the mother willing to risk her own life to save her child, just as the character sends her child into danger to save another.
- John Green compares being trapped in life's decisions to being lost in a labyrinth, with people imagining escaping it through an idealized future, just as the character feels trapped in her present circumstances.
Analogy type of test.pptx ( new )
The document discusses analogy tests, which measure reasoning ability through comparisons of relationships between pairs of words. It defines analogy tests and outlines various types of relationships that can be tested, such as word meanings, categories, causes and effects. Examples of analogy questions are provided to illustrate different relationship types, along with guidance on constructing effective analogy tests.
Analogies notes
The document outlines different types of semantic relationships that can exist between words including action-object relationships, synonyms, antonyms, location, part-whole, classification, function, cause-effect, degree, characteristic-quality, performer-action, and performer-object. Examples are provided for each relationship type to illustrate how two words can be semantically related in different ways. The relationships can be used to understand how the meanings of words are connected to each other.
Analogies Ppt
The document discusses analogies and their crucial or decisive parts. It provides examples of analogies and asks which part is most important. For the analogy of a nut and its kernel, the kernel is identified as the most vital part. Another analogy example provided is a picture and its frame, asking which surrounds the other. Both a ring surrounding a finger and a fence surrounding a yard seem to fit, but upon further reflection, a frame borders a picture and a fence borders a yard, making fence:yard the logical match.
Analogy type of test.pptx ( new )
The document discusses analogy tests, which measure reasoning ability through comparisons of relationships between pairs of words. It defines analogy tests and outlines several types of relationships that can be tested, such as word meanings, categories, causes and effects. Examples of analogy questions are provided to illustrate each relationship type. Suggestions are made for constructing effective analogy tests, such as using parallel language and ensuring distractors are plausible.
Phrase modifier swma
The document provides examples of phrases and clauses and asks the reader to identify whether a set of words is a phrase or clause. It then provides examples of participial phrases and infinitive phrases, explaining their functions. It provides exercises for the reader to identify and modify nouns with participial and infinitive phrases.
Argument from analogy
Arguments based on analogies often overlook important differences between the two things being compared. Examples are provided that use analogies in absurd ways by drawing comparisons between unrelated things like a person growing on another like a bacterial colony or having a perfectly oval face shaped like a circle compressed by an exercise device. A further example is given of being as lame as a duck that was literally lame from stepping on a land mine.
Analogies (level 2)
This document contains a series of analogy questions with multiple choice answers. Each question provides two terms and asks the reader to select another pair of terms that best illustrates the same relationship. The analogies cover a wide range of everyday topics including objects, foods, locations, functions, and characteristics.
Apraising analogical argument
Analogical arguments claim that a conclusion is probable based on similarities between two or more things. To evaluate the strength of an analogical argument, six criteria are used: 1) the number of similar entities or cases in the premises, 2) the variety of those cases, 3) the number of similar respects between the cases, 4) the relevance of those respects, 5) any dissimilarities between the cases, and 6) how modest the conclusion's claim is based on the premises. Arguments are stronger when they have more entities, a variety of cases, many relevant similar respects, few dissimilarities, and more modest conclusions.
Chapter six
This document discusses inductive arguments. It defines inductive arguments as those whose premises provide evidence for but do not guarantee the conclusion. It then examines 4 types of inductive arguments: enumerative induction, statistical syllogism, causal argument, and analogy. It provides examples of each type and criteria for evaluating the reliability and strength of inductive arguments.
Logic
Logic is the study of reasoning and correct thinking. It involves analyzing concepts, establishing general laws of
truth, and determining valid forms of argument. Logic is applicable to all fields as it provides standards for
consistent and evidence-based reasoning. It has wide scope and helps with social studies, engineering, mathematics,
science, and computer programming through modeling reality, simplifying complex problems, and representing
information processing in a logical way. Studying logic is important as it helps develop critical thinking skills
needed to make rational decisions, adapt to new situations, and form justifiable beliefs.
Introduction to Logic
- Philosophy began through the natural human process of wondering, as Socrates described. The curious Greeks sought to understand the world through philosophical inquiry.
- Thales was regarded as the first to philosophically articulate the basic substance of the universe, proposing that water or moisture was the fundamental principle of life. This inspired other Greeks to develop new concepts.
- Logic demands that all thinking adhere to rules and guidelines to ensure correctness. It trains the mind and prepares one for further study in other areas.
Judgment and proposition or logical statement
This document discusses judgment, propositions, and logical statements. It defines judgment as a mental act of affirming or denying something, while a proposition is the product of judgment expressed as a statement. Propositions take the form of sentences and can be declarative, interrogative, imperative, or exclamatory. Categorical propositions have a subject, predicate, and copula that relate the subject and predicate. The quality, quantity, and form of propositions are also explained. Hypothetical propositions include conditional statements relating an antecedent and consequent, disjunctive statements presenting alternatives, and conjunctive statements asserting two alternatives cannot be true together. Venn diagrams are introduced to visually represent categorical statements using circles for classes
Logic introduction
This document provides an introduction to logic. It outlines the objectives of studying logic as sharpening intellect, developing learning ability, strengthening understanding, and promoting clear thinking. Key benefits include supporting reasoning powers, distinguishing good from bad arguments, and learning principles of clear thinking. Logic is defined as the study of correct versus incorrect reasoning. Important concepts discussed include premises, propositions, arguments, sound versus unsound arguments, and laws of logic. The overall aim is to learn how to evaluate arguments.
Logic
This document provides an overview of logic, including its definition, methods of reasoning, divisions, and key concepts. Logic is concerned with correct thinking and reasoning. It can be considered both an art that guides reason and a science that investigates and explains laws of thought. There are two main methods of reasoning - inductive, which obtains universal knowledge from particular cases, and deductive, which proceeds from universal to particular. Logic is divided into formal logic, which focuses on correct thinking, and material logic, which studies main philosophical problems in logic. Key concepts explained include terms, propositions, and inference.
Logic arguments and_fallacies
This document defines and discusses different types of arguments and logical fallacies. It begins by defining deductive and inductive arguments, and explaining how to identify them based on language used. Common types of deductive and inductive arguments are then outlined. The document also discusses the concepts of validity, soundness, and strength as they relate to arguments. Finally, it provides detailed descriptions and examples of many common logical fallacies, categorizing them as fallacies of relevance, weak induction, ambiguity, analogy, or formal fallacies.
Logical fallacies powerpoint
This document defines logical fallacies and common types of fallacious arguments. It explains that an argument consists of premises and a conclusion, and fallacies occur when arguments fail in certain ways. Sixteen specific fallacies are described, including hasty generalization, slippery slope, appeal to authority, straw man, and equivocation. The document concludes with tips for preventing fallacious reasoning such as arguing against oneself and fairly characterizing opposing arguments.
Logic Ppt
Here are the specific kinds of supposition for the terms in each proposition:
1. "Tamarao" - Essential supposition
2. "Tamarao" - Material supposition
3. "Pag-asa" - Logical supposition
4. "Pag-asa" - Material supposition