Este documento plantea varias dudas sobre cómo podrían manipularse los resultados de un sorteo de balotas impulsadas por corrientes de aire. Menciona que sería fácil alterar ligeramente el tamaño o peso de las balotas para determinar de antemano qué números no saldrán. También sugiere que habría tiempo entre el cierre de apuestas y el sorteo para acomodar los resultados en función de los números no apostados. Finalmente, propone formas de probar la transparencia del sorteo, como pesando y filmando cada etapa
Different forms of IPR, Validity of IPR forms and Procedure of Registration of different IPR forms.
Reference : https://www.icsi.edu/media/website/IntellectualPropertyRightLaws&Practice.pdf
Indirect patent infringement occurs when a third party contributes to or induces another's direct infringement of a patent, without themselves directly infringing. There are two types of indirect infringement: contributory infringement, which involves supplying components with no other use than to infringe a patented invention; and induced infringement, where one induces another to directly infringe, such as by providing instructions to use a component in an infringing way. Indirect infringement has legal consequences for both the direct infringer and any parties found to have contributed to or induced the infringement.
The document discusses international patent registration through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Key points:
- The PCT provides a unified procedure for filing patent applications to seek protection for an invention in multiple countries.
- Applicants can file a single "international" patent application in one language to satisfy filing requirements in multiple participating countries.
- The international phase includes an international search and preliminary examination. The national phase then involves processing the application before national patent offices.
- This system allows applicants more time (30 months vs. 12 months) and a postponed cost to seek patent rights in multiple countries compared to individual filings.
This document discusses the relationship between competition law and intellectual property rights (IPR). It notes that while IPR provides exclusive rights to encourage innovation, competition law aims to promote market efficiency. There can be tensions between the two. The document outlines the objectives of competition law in India and the nature and intent of IPR. It discusses how the TRIPS agreement and Indian competition law address potential abuses of IPR, such as compulsory licensing. The application of competition laws to restrictive IPR practices like tie-in arrangements and package licensing is also examined.
The document discusses copyright as part of intellectual property rights under TRIPS. It provides background on the history of copyright law in India and defines intellectual property rights. It describes organizations like WIPO and NIPO that deal with intellectual property. It explains key aspects of copyright like related rights, registration, term and infringement remedies. It compares India and Brazil's copyright acts and discusses concepts like copyleft. Statistical data and case studies on copyright issues are also presented.
Trade Secrets: Presentation on Trade Secret Protection in India - BananaIPBananaIP Counsels
This document discusses trade secret protection in India. It begins by defining trade secrets as confidential business or technical information with competitive advantage and potential for revenue generation. Trade secrets must be not readily ascertainable, acquired through proper means, and subject to reasonable security efforts. The document outlines how trade secrets can be acquired and protected, including through confidentiality agreements and identification of confidential information. It also discusses enforcement of trade secret protection through statutes, contracts, arbitration, and court decisions in India which have addressed issues like proving damages and explicitly defining confidential information.
A patent agent is a person registered under the Indian Patent Act to help others obtain patents. To become an agent, one must have an engineering, science, or technology degree from an Indian university and pass a qualifying exam administered by the patent office. The exam consists of two papers testing knowledge of patent law and procedures, as well as a viva voce interview. Those who pass with an overall 60% score are registered as agents. Registered agents can practice before the patent office and prepare patent documents and applications. Maintaining registration requires paying annual fees. Grounds for removal from the register include bankruptcy or criminal convictions.
This document defines trademarks and discusses trademark infringement. It contains the following key points:
1. A trademark is a sign that distinguishes goods/services of one enterprise from another and can include words, names, slogans, symbols, and other identifiers.
2. Trademark infringement involves the unauthorized use of a trademark that is identical or deceptively similar to a registered trademark in a way that causes confusion.
3. Penalties for infringement include injunctions, damages, seizure of infringing goods, fines, and imprisonment for repeat offenders. Vicarious liability and contributory infringement are also discussed.
Different forms of IPR, Validity of IPR forms and Procedure of Registration of different IPR forms.
Reference : https://www.icsi.edu/media/website/IntellectualPropertyRightLaws&Practice.pdf
Indirect patent infringement occurs when a third party contributes to or induces another's direct infringement of a patent, without themselves directly infringing. There are two types of indirect infringement: contributory infringement, which involves supplying components with no other use than to infringe a patented invention; and induced infringement, where one induces another to directly infringe, such as by providing instructions to use a component in an infringing way. Indirect infringement has legal consequences for both the direct infringer and any parties found to have contributed to or induced the infringement.
The document discusses international patent registration through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Key points:
- The PCT provides a unified procedure for filing patent applications to seek protection for an invention in multiple countries.
- Applicants can file a single "international" patent application in one language to satisfy filing requirements in multiple participating countries.
- The international phase includes an international search and preliminary examination. The national phase then involves processing the application before national patent offices.
- This system allows applicants more time (30 months vs. 12 months) and a postponed cost to seek patent rights in multiple countries compared to individual filings.
This document discusses the relationship between competition law and intellectual property rights (IPR). It notes that while IPR provides exclusive rights to encourage innovation, competition law aims to promote market efficiency. There can be tensions between the two. The document outlines the objectives of competition law in India and the nature and intent of IPR. It discusses how the TRIPS agreement and Indian competition law address potential abuses of IPR, such as compulsory licensing. The application of competition laws to restrictive IPR practices like tie-in arrangements and package licensing is also examined.
The document discusses copyright as part of intellectual property rights under TRIPS. It provides background on the history of copyright law in India and defines intellectual property rights. It describes organizations like WIPO and NIPO that deal with intellectual property. It explains key aspects of copyright like related rights, registration, term and infringement remedies. It compares India and Brazil's copyright acts and discusses concepts like copyleft. Statistical data and case studies on copyright issues are also presented.
Trade Secrets: Presentation on Trade Secret Protection in India - BananaIPBananaIP Counsels
This document discusses trade secret protection in India. It begins by defining trade secrets as confidential business or technical information with competitive advantage and potential for revenue generation. Trade secrets must be not readily ascertainable, acquired through proper means, and subject to reasonable security efforts. The document outlines how trade secrets can be acquired and protected, including through confidentiality agreements and identification of confidential information. It also discusses enforcement of trade secret protection through statutes, contracts, arbitration, and court decisions in India which have addressed issues like proving damages and explicitly defining confidential information.
A patent agent is a person registered under the Indian Patent Act to help others obtain patents. To become an agent, one must have an engineering, science, or technology degree from an Indian university and pass a qualifying exam administered by the patent office. The exam consists of two papers testing knowledge of patent law and procedures, as well as a viva voce interview. Those who pass with an overall 60% score are registered as agents. Registered agents can practice before the patent office and prepare patent documents and applications. Maintaining registration requires paying annual fees. Grounds for removal from the register include bankruptcy or criminal convictions.
This document defines trademarks and discusses trademark infringement. It contains the following key points:
1. A trademark is a sign that distinguishes goods/services of one enterprise from another and can include words, names, slogans, symbols, and other identifiers.
2. Trademark infringement involves the unauthorized use of a trademark that is identical or deceptively similar to a registered trademark in a way that causes confusion.
3. Penalties for infringement include injunctions, damages, seizure of infringing goods, fines, and imprisonment for repeat offenders. Vicarious liability and contributory infringement are also discussed.
Intellectual Property Rights in the Media IndustryPinank Vora
The document discusses copyright law in India as governed by the Copyright Act of 1957. It provides definitions for key terms like visual recordings, sound recordings, and different types of copyrightable works. It also discusses direct and indirect infringements of copyright. The document summarizes the court case R.G Anand vs M/S. Delux Films, where a playwright alleged a film was copied from his play. The court ruled that while ideas are not protected, substantial copying of expression is infringement. The document also summarizes the Supreme Court case Novartis v. Union of India regarding patenting of the cancer drug Gleevec. The court upheld the view that under Indian law, incremental drug innovations must show enhanced therapeutic efficacy
The document discusses intellectual property laws in India, including laws relating to trademarks, copyrights, patents, industrial designs, geographical indications, and information technology. It outlines what constitutes infringement of these intellectual property rights and the available legal remedies. Key points include that registration is not required for copyrights and trademarks but is needed for patents, industrial designs, and geographical indications. Remedies for infringement include civil actions like injunctions and damages, as well as criminal charges.
ROMDAS Elite Survey Vehicle with Laser Crack Measurement SystemSimon Gough
The document discusses a ROMDAS Elite survey vehicle with LCMS (Laser Crack Measurement System) for collecting pavement data. The LCMS uses lasers to scan the pavement surface and capture profiles, roughness measurements, cracking, rutting and other defects. It outputs data like IRI, cracking measurements and images overlaid with defects. Lane tracking ensures consistent profiles despite vehicle wander. Automatic defect detection could supplement subjective RAMM condition surveys. Repeatable measurements are highlighted as important for roughness, rut depth and cracking analysis over time.
The document discusses the history and evolution of patent law in India from 1856 to the present. Key developments include the first patent legislation in 1856, amendments in 1857 and 1859, consolidation of laws in 1888, establishment of the Controller of Patents in 1911, recommendations of committees in 1949 and 1957 that led to the Patents Act of 1970, and India's adoption of international treaties and organizations related to intellectual property including TRIPS in 1994.
ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΥ ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΟΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΩΣΗ ΕΡΓΟΤΑΞΙΟΥ/ΜΗΧΑΝΗΜΑΤΑ ΤΕΧΝΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΓΩΝ ΤΗΣ Γ΄ΤΑΞΗΣ ΕΠΑΛ ΤΟΥ ΤΟΜΕΑ ΔΟΜΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΓΩΝ, ΔΟΜΗΜΕΝΟΥ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΧΙΤΕΚΤΟΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΧΕΔΙΑΣΜΟΥ
Protection of plant vareities and farmers right act, 2001DNMadhushree1
REGISTERABLE PLANT VARIETIES (slide no.8)
(i) NEW VARIETY is a variety which is not in public domain
> In India earlier than 1 year before the date of filling the application;
> outside India, in the case of trees or vines earlier than 6 years or in any other case earlier than 4 years.
(ii) EXTANT VARIETY is a Variety available in India which is -
> Notified under section 5 of the Seeds Act, 1996; or
> A Farmers variety
> A variety about which there is common knowledge
(iii) FARMERS VARIETY is a variety which-
> Has been traditionally cultivated and evolved by the farmers in their fields;
> Is a wild relative or land race of a variety about which the farmers possess the common knowledge.
(iv) ESSENTIALLY DERIVED VARIETY in respect of a variety (the initial variety), shall be called when it -
> Is predominantly derived from a variety that itself is predominantly derived from an initial variety, while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotype of such initial variety;
> Is clearly distinguishable from initial variety.
TEST TO BE CONDUCTED (slide no.12)
Every applicant shall, along with the application for registration, make available to the Registrar some quantity of seeds of a variety for registration of which such application is made for the purpose of conduction of test to evaluate whether the seeds of such variety along with parental material conform to the standards as may be specified by regulations.
The seeds samples received by the Authority will be properly tested for its purity and germination. A part of the seed sample will be sent to the test center for conduction of DUS tests and a part of it is kept by the Authority in the National Gene Bank to maintain the seeds samples of the registered varieties for their entire period of protection.
The DUS testing shall be field and multi-location based for at least 2 similar crop seasons. Special tests (laboratory based) shall be conducted only when DUS testing fails to establish the requirement of the distinctiveness.
Provided that in the case of trees and vines there shall be an option on the manner of the DUS testing that a panel of 3 experts shall visit the on-farm test sites for 2 similar crop seasons as may be specified.
The DUS test shall be necessary for all new and extant varieties except essentially derived varieties and it shall be conducted on a minimum of 2 locations. There are special guidelines for the DUS test for each crop.
Intellectual Property Rights in the Media IndustryPinank Vora
The document discusses copyright law in India as governed by the Copyright Act of 1957. It provides definitions for key terms like visual recordings, sound recordings, and different types of copyrightable works. It also discusses direct and indirect infringements of copyright. The document summarizes the court case R.G Anand vs M/S. Delux Films, where a playwright alleged a film was copied from his play. The court ruled that while ideas are not protected, substantial copying of expression is infringement. The document also summarizes the Supreme Court case Novartis v. Union of India regarding patenting of the cancer drug Gleevec. The court upheld the view that under Indian law, incremental drug innovations must show enhanced therapeutic efficacy
The document discusses intellectual property laws in India, including laws relating to trademarks, copyrights, patents, industrial designs, geographical indications, and information technology. It outlines what constitutes infringement of these intellectual property rights and the available legal remedies. Key points include that registration is not required for copyrights and trademarks but is needed for patents, industrial designs, and geographical indications. Remedies for infringement include civil actions like injunctions and damages, as well as criminal charges.
ROMDAS Elite Survey Vehicle with Laser Crack Measurement SystemSimon Gough
The document discusses a ROMDAS Elite survey vehicle with LCMS (Laser Crack Measurement System) for collecting pavement data. The LCMS uses lasers to scan the pavement surface and capture profiles, roughness measurements, cracking, rutting and other defects. It outputs data like IRI, cracking measurements and images overlaid with defects. Lane tracking ensures consistent profiles despite vehicle wander. Automatic defect detection could supplement subjective RAMM condition surveys. Repeatable measurements are highlighted as important for roughness, rut depth and cracking analysis over time.
The document discusses the history and evolution of patent law in India from 1856 to the present. Key developments include the first patent legislation in 1856, amendments in 1857 and 1859, consolidation of laws in 1888, establishment of the Controller of Patents in 1911, recommendations of committees in 1949 and 1957 that led to the Patents Act of 1970, and India's adoption of international treaties and organizations related to intellectual property including TRIPS in 1994.
ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΥ ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΟΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΩΣΗ ΕΡΓΟΤΑΞΙΟΥ/ΜΗΧΑΝΗΜΑΤΑ ΤΕΧΝΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΓΩΝ ΤΗΣ Γ΄ΤΑΞΗΣ ΕΠΑΛ ΤΟΥ ΤΟΜΕΑ ΔΟΜΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΓΩΝ, ΔΟΜΗΜΕΝΟΥ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΧΙΤΕΚΤΟΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΧΕΔΙΑΣΜΟΥ
Protection of plant vareities and farmers right act, 2001DNMadhushree1
REGISTERABLE PLANT VARIETIES (slide no.8)
(i) NEW VARIETY is a variety which is not in public domain
> In India earlier than 1 year before the date of filling the application;
> outside India, in the case of trees or vines earlier than 6 years or in any other case earlier than 4 years.
(ii) EXTANT VARIETY is a Variety available in India which is -
> Notified under section 5 of the Seeds Act, 1996; or
> A Farmers variety
> A variety about which there is common knowledge
(iii) FARMERS VARIETY is a variety which-
> Has been traditionally cultivated and evolved by the farmers in their fields;
> Is a wild relative or land race of a variety about which the farmers possess the common knowledge.
(iv) ESSENTIALLY DERIVED VARIETY in respect of a variety (the initial variety), shall be called when it -
> Is predominantly derived from a variety that itself is predominantly derived from an initial variety, while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotype of such initial variety;
> Is clearly distinguishable from initial variety.
TEST TO BE CONDUCTED (slide no.12)
Every applicant shall, along with the application for registration, make available to the Registrar some quantity of seeds of a variety for registration of which such application is made for the purpose of conduction of test to evaluate whether the seeds of such variety along with parental material conform to the standards as may be specified by regulations.
The seeds samples received by the Authority will be properly tested for its purity and germination. A part of the seed sample will be sent to the test center for conduction of DUS tests and a part of it is kept by the Authority in the National Gene Bank to maintain the seeds samples of the registered varieties for their entire period of protection.
The DUS testing shall be field and multi-location based for at least 2 similar crop seasons. Special tests (laboratory based) shall be conducted only when DUS testing fails to establish the requirement of the distinctiveness.
Provided that in the case of trees and vines there shall be an option on the manner of the DUS testing that a panel of 3 experts shall visit the on-farm test sites for 2 similar crop seasons as may be specified.
The DUS test shall be necessary for all new and extant varieties except essentially derived varieties and it shall be conducted on a minimum of 2 locations. There are special guidelines for the DUS test for each crop.
Protection of plant vareities and farmers right act, 2001
Como manipular el juego del baloto
1. COMO MANIPULAR UN SORTEO DE BALOTAS MOVIDAS POR CORRIENTES DE AIRE.<br />Por sus características de mecánica, el baloto y otros juegos de azar son muy fáciles de manipular, con el peso o el tamaño de las balotas, sin embargo supuestamente no hay tal y el juego es limpio, PERO desde afuera NOS asaltan ciertas dudas:<br />¿porque nunca hay publico en un sorteo, porque no se puede presenciar en vivo?, ¿Por qué el publico no puede presenciar el proceso de medición y pesaje de las balotas?, ¿Por qué nunca hay una filmación ni siquiera del proceso de verificación de las balotas?, ¿Por qué no se permite que un laboratorio de metrología independiente certifique las balotas y avale el sorteo, presenciándolo para dar fe de que realmente se están utilizando las balotas por ellos certificadas?, ¿Por qué ni siquiera se publica aunque sea un acta del proceso de verificación de las balotas?, si el registro de las apuestas es electrónico, ¿Por qué, una vez cerradas las apuestas antes del sorteo, el publico no tiene acceso de antemano, (POR EJEMPLO POR INTERNET), a la base de datos de los números apostados?, ¿si la apuesta es electrónica, porque tienen que cerrar las apuestas casi una hora antes del sorteo?, ¿Qué pasa en esa hora? Habría tiempo suficiente para arreglar las cosas en función de los números no apostados para que si no les conviene, nadie se lo gane.<br />¿Si el sorteo es transparente porque cada vez que no cae, el acumulado no aumenta en la misma cantidad con que se reinicia cuando si se lo ganan(5.000 millones)?, solo aumenta en 500 o máximo 1000 millones, ¿significa esto que el sistema esta acomodado porque si en el peor de los casos todas las veces alguien se lo ganara se quebrarían?.<br />VALDRIA LA PENA solicitar esto por medio de derechos de petición, pero se trata de una firma privada que no esta obligada a suministrar esa información a ningún particular y que la presencia de “particulares” en la verificación o en el sorteo van en contra de las normas del mismo. (vaya vaya)!!!<br />Es muy fácil manipular los resultados variando ligeramente las dimensiones de las balotas (en decimas o centésimas de milímetro), con relación al diámetro interno del tubo por donde son succionadas para su selección, de esta manera se puede determinar de antemano cuales no van a salir y cuales si. <br />Otra forma de manipularlo sin que a simple vista se note es alterando ligera o significativamente el peso de ciertas balotas, para que sean las únicas que puedan elevarse por el tubo de succión, esos cálculos exactos pueden hacerse utilizando simple física, ya que si conocemos la energía con que serán impulsadas y succionadas, puede calcularse cual es el peso mínimo para que nunca sobrepasen cierta altura y no alcancen la boca del tubo de succión (que esta colocado es a media altura del tanque de viento.<br />Simplemente antes del sorteo, (EN LA HORA “CUCHI CUCH”I) al saber que combinaciones de números no han sido apostados, (para eso sirve el registro de las apuestas electrónico), se prepara el juego de balotas que corresponda a esos determinados números y listo, de resto puede montarse una pantomima para hacer parecer que no hay tal.<br />Veo dos formas muy fáciles de probar si el juego esta o no esta arreglado previamente:<br />Esto debería hacerse a la vista de todo el mundo, ojala en presencia del público que lo desee ver, transmitido en vivo y en presencia de todo el publico, O POR LO MENOS POR INTERNET PARA LOS INTERESADOS.<br />Hacer funcionar la maquina hasta que realmente sacara las 45 balotas, y luego de esto si volverlas a introducir al “tanque de viento” para el sorteo.<br />Que las balotas ingresaran al “tanque de viento” por el mismo tubo por el que van a salir las seleccionadas y que previamente pasaran por una bascula que las pesara una a una, con un margen de error razonable (no mayor a la milésima de gramo) para estar seguro de que realmente cualquiera de las 45 puede ser seleccionada con la misma probabilidad.<br />Iguales observaciones se pueden hacer para todos los sorteos, rifas y loterías que hoy en día juegan con este sistema de balotas aspiradas neumáticamente, diversas loterías y chances.<br />No estoy acusando a nadie, no afirmando nada, simplemente estoy compartiendo dudas razonables que harían pensar a cualquiera medianamente lucido que estos sorteos son muy manipulables y que los que los organizan no hacen nada por demostrar que no los están manipulando. “ANTE LA FALTA DE CLARIDAD, NORMALMENTE LO QUE SE DEBE HACER ES PRENDER LA LUZ”, podríamos estar ante la estafa colectiva mas grande de toda la historia, inclusive mas que la de las pirámides, DAVID MURCIA y sus colegas serian unos estúpidos aprendices al lado de estos MAGOS, ellos pretendieron ganar mucho de nuestro dinero pocas veces, los magos de los sorteos neumáticos pueden haber logrado ganar poco de cada uno de nosotros, pero muchas veces y ya durante mas de diez años, y CON EL AVAL DEL ESTADO!!!!.<br />DESCRIPCION DEL MECANISMO DEL BALOTO.<br />- Al comienzo las 45 balotas están en un túnel con pendiente (no se si ordenadas o no).<br />Las 45 balotas caen una tras otra rodando desde un “túnel” con una pendiente y forma de zigzag.<br />Caen a un plato cónico que por su volumen las contiene a todas.<br />2) - Las balotas que caen primero, caen impulsadas por el empuje de una cadena grande, así la que cae primero cae empujada por las otras 44, la segunda por 43, la tercera por 42 y así sucesivamente hasta que la numero 45 solo cae impulsada por el empuje de ella misma (de su propia masa que rueda).<br />3) - Se activa un mecanismo de impulso por medio de viento que sale del centro del plato cónico, un impulso tal que toma cada balota que va quedando frente al orificio central de salida del viento y la eleva hasta casi la mitad del recipiente o “cámara de viento”. Si suponemos la masa de alguna de las balotas, (o si pudiéramos saber su masa, podemos calcular el tiempo que demora en elevarse y caer).<br />4) - En algunos momentos se abre una compuerta y permite aspirar una o varias balotas a través de un tubo con boca cónica que cuelga del techo justo sobre el orificio que impulsa las balotas.<br />5) - Cuando una o varias balotas que por “azar” se alzan cerca de la boca cónica del tubo de succión y en ese momento se abre la compuerta que permite la aspiración, la(s) balota(s) mencionada(s) es(son) aspirada(s) y la primera que sube ocupa un espacio o receptáculo de la compuerta, trancando a las que vienen detrás.<br />6) - El mecanismo de compuerta al detectar que ha capturado una balota se mueve y cierra la succión, las balotas aspiradas y no elegidas vuelven a caer y siguen saltando.<br />7) - La compuerta al moverse, lleva la balota seleccionada a una rampa para mostrarlas como las seleccionadas.<br />8) al final luego de seleccionadas las seis se detiene el viento y casi inmediatamente las balotas se detienen, eso nos lleva a concluir que por su material no rebotan prácticamente.<br />CONSECUENCIAS DE ESTE SISTEMA MECANICO DEL AZAR.<br />- Lo anterior implica que:<br />Por causa de 1) y 2), en el plato las primeras que caen tienden a rebotar y localizarse mas cerca del orificio central de impulso.(las del 1 a 15, grupo 1)<br />Las del medio con menos rebote caen y se ubican por lo general en la parte superior central del plato y en la parte superior mas alejada del orificio de salida, (las 16 a 30 grupo 2)<br />en cambio las que caen de ultimas, se ubican en la parte superior en el costado del plato mas cercano al orificio de salida del túnel por el que todas rodaron. (las 31 a 45 grupo 3)<br />Nota: Puede analizarse estadísticamente los resultados para ver si hay mas grupos<br />Al activarse el aire impulsa inicialmente las del grupo 1, entonces la primera balota seleccionada por lo general es de este grupo,<br />Las siguientes en saltar, si ninguna rebota, son las que están mas cerca por los lados y contra las paredes inclinadas del plato, no por encima porque al salir disparadas las de abajo, las empujan por encima hacia los lados.<br />Podemos calcular un tiempo promedio de salto y mediante la secuencia:<br />Estar en el borde, bajar sobre el plato, rodar al centro y saltar impulsada por el chorro de aire, estimar ciclos de salto para los diferentes grupos de balotas, así estimar, calcular o ver en la filmación el tiempo de estos ciclos de salto para de esta manera ver en función del instante en que se abre la compuerta de aspiración, cual balota, o de cual grupo es la que esta saltando (o arriba en el salto), y por lo tanto será aspirada. Esto hay que ajustarlo viendo empíricamente los sorteos y haciendo análisis numérico en función del orden en que salen las balotas.<br />Se debe ver la filmación para estimar el tiempo de cada salto y hacer un cálculo con varios pesos supuestos de cada pelota y valores del impulso inicial dado por la columna de aire.<br />OTRA FORMA DE ALTERAR EL RESULTADO.<br />Las balotas mas pesadas ruedan y se hunden mas hacia la boca que las otras, por tanto las mas pesadas son impulsadas mejor hacia arriba y si hay magnetismo que ordena abrir la succión, entonces las mas pesadas serán las seleccionadas.<br />