Theft, in layman the act of dishonestly taking something that belongs to someone else and keeping it. We generally describe theft to be the act of stealing property belonging to somebody else. However, theft under IPC has certain specific requirements and ingredients. According to Section 378, theft means dishonestly taking any movable property out of the possession of a person. This taking must always be without the concerned person’s consent. Therefore, in order to constitute theft under IPC, the following conditions must exist:
Ingredients: To constitute theft, the following ingredients are required:
a) The accused must have a dishonest intention to take the property,
b) The property must be movable,
c) The property must be taken out of the possession of another person,
d) Resulting in wrongful gain by one and wrongful loss to another,
e) Taking must be without the person’s consent (implied or expressed)
All of these requirements must exist in order to complete the offence of theft. If anyone of them is missing, the offender is not guilty of theft. For example, a person may take and move somebody else’s property thinking it actually belongs to him. In this case, since the offender moved the property as a mistake, he did not commit theft.
A dying declaration, also known as a "dying declaration exception," is a legal concept in many jurisdictions that allows certain statements made by a person who believes they are facing imminent death to be admissible in court as evidence, even though they would typically be considered hearsay. This exception to the hearsay rule is grounded in the idea that a person who believes they are about to die has little motive to lie and is therefore more likely to speak the truth. Dying declarations are an important aspect of criminal law and can have a significant impact on the outcome of trials. In this comprehensive essay, we will explore the history, legal principles, requirements, and controversies surrounding dying declarations, delving into their significance in the legal system.Historical BackgroundThe concept of the dying declaration has a long history in legal systems around the world. The idea that statements made by a person on their deathbed should be given special consideration is rooted in ancient legal traditions. In English common law, which has greatly influenced the legal systems of many countries, the concept of the dying declaration can be traced back to the medieval period. It was based on the belief that individuals who were aware of their impending death were unlikely to make false statements because they would soon face a higher authority, thereby giving rise to a presumption of truthfulness.Over time, the principles surrounding dying declarations have evolved and been codified in various legal systems. This essay will primarily focus on the common law understanding of dying declarations, which serves as the basis for the legal principles in many English-speaking countries, including the United States.Legal PrinciplesDying declarations are a subset of hearsay evidence, which generally refers to statements made outside of the court that are offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Hearsay is generally inadmissible because it lacks the safeguards of live testimony, cross-examination, and oath-taking, which are typically required for the admission of evidence in a legal proceeding. However, dying declarations are considered an exception to this general rule due to their unique circumstances and the historical belief in their reliability.To be admissible as a dying declaration, certain legal principles and requirements must be satisfied. These principles have evolved over time and may vary slightly from one jurisdiction to another. However, some common elements exist across legal systems. These include:1. Declarant's Belief of Impending DeathA crucial requirement for a statement to be considered a dying declaration is that the declarant must have a genuine belief in their impending death at the time they make the statement. This requirement is essential to establish the declarant's motivation to speak the truth. The declarant's subjective belief in imminent death must be proven, either through the
Theft, in layman the act of dishonestly taking something that belongs to someone else and keeping it. We generally describe theft to be the act of stealing property belonging to somebody else. However, theft under IPC has certain specific requirements and ingredients. According to Section 378, theft means dishonestly taking any movable property out of the possession of a person. This taking must always be without the concerned person’s consent. Therefore, in order to constitute theft under IPC, the following conditions must exist:
Ingredients: To constitute theft, the following ingredients are required:
a) The accused must have a dishonest intention to take the property,
b) The property must be movable,
c) The property must be taken out of the possession of another person,
d) Resulting in wrongful gain by one and wrongful loss to another,
e) Taking must be without the person’s consent (implied or expressed)
All of these requirements must exist in order to complete the offence of theft. If anyone of them is missing, the offender is not guilty of theft. For example, a person may take and move somebody else’s property thinking it actually belongs to him. In this case, since the offender moved the property as a mistake, he did not commit theft.
A dying declaration, also known as a "dying declaration exception," is a legal concept in many jurisdictions that allows certain statements made by a person who believes they are facing imminent death to be admissible in court as evidence, even though they would typically be considered hearsay. This exception to the hearsay rule is grounded in the idea that a person who believes they are about to die has little motive to lie and is therefore more likely to speak the truth. Dying declarations are an important aspect of criminal law and can have a significant impact on the outcome of trials. In this comprehensive essay, we will explore the history, legal principles, requirements, and controversies surrounding dying declarations, delving into their significance in the legal system.Historical BackgroundThe concept of the dying declaration has a long history in legal systems around the world. The idea that statements made by a person on their deathbed should be given special consideration is rooted in ancient legal traditions. In English common law, which has greatly influenced the legal systems of many countries, the concept of the dying declaration can be traced back to the medieval period. It was based on the belief that individuals who were aware of their impending death were unlikely to make false statements because they would soon face a higher authority, thereby giving rise to a presumption of truthfulness.Over time, the principles surrounding dying declarations have evolved and been codified in various legal systems. This essay will primarily focus on the common law understanding of dying declarations, which serves as the basis for the legal principles in many English-speaking countries, including the United States.Legal PrinciplesDying declarations are a subset of hearsay evidence, which generally refers to statements made outside of the court that are offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Hearsay is generally inadmissible because it lacks the safeguards of live testimony, cross-examination, and oath-taking, which are typically required for the admission of evidence in a legal proceeding. However, dying declarations are considered an exception to this general rule due to their unique circumstances and the historical belief in their reliability.To be admissible as a dying declaration, certain legal principles and requirements must be satisfied. These principles have evolved over time and may vary slightly from one jurisdiction to another. However, some common elements exist across legal systems. These include:1. Declarant's Belief of Impending DeathA crucial requirement for a statement to be considered a dying declaration is that the declarant must have a genuine belief in their impending death at the time they make the statement. This requirement is essential to establish the declarant's motivation to speak the truth. The declarant's subjective belief in imminent death must be proven, either through the
Know about anticipatory bail and condition to grant the bail.
#anticipatorybail #CrPC #bail #court #sectio438 and know why the anticipatory bail is filed?
Watch the YT video for a better understanding of Anticipatory bail: https://youtu.be/zG56kfug_ww
EL FISCAL GENERAL DE JUSTICIA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO, JOSÉ LUIS CERVANTES MARTÍNEZ, NOMBRÓ NUEVO VICEFISCAL GENERAL Y FISCAL ESPECIAL DE COMBATE A LA CORRUPCIÓN
defamation ppt- in this ppt the following topics are covered:-
1.defamation- meaning and definition
2.kinds of defamation
3.essentials of defamation
4.defences against defamation
Know about anticipatory bail and condition to grant the bail.
#anticipatorybail #CrPC #bail #court #sectio438 and know why the anticipatory bail is filed?
Watch the YT video for a better understanding of Anticipatory bail: https://youtu.be/zG56kfug_ww
EL FISCAL GENERAL DE JUSTICIA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO, JOSÉ LUIS CERVANTES MARTÍNEZ, NOMBRÓ NUEVO VICEFISCAL GENERAL Y FISCAL ESPECIAL DE COMBATE A LA CORRUPCIÓN
defamation ppt- in this ppt the following topics are covered:-
1.defamation- meaning and definition
2.kinds of defamation
3.essentials of defamation
4.defences against defamation
POR SECUESTRO EXPRÉS EN METEPEC, FISCALÍA EDOMÉX OBTIENE SENTENCIA DE CONDENA DE 55 AÑOS PARA DOS INTEGRANTES DE UN GRUPO DELINCUENCIAL CON ORÍGENES EN MICHOACÁN
FISCALÍA EDOMÉX Y POLICÍA MUNICIPAL DE ATLACOMULCO RECUPERAN MERCANCÍA ROBADA CONSISTENTE EN 25 TONELADAS DE LIMÓN, RESULTADO DE CATEO EN INMUEBLE DE ESA DEMARCACIÓN
SEDENA, SSPC, CONAHO, GUARDIA NACIONAL Y FISCALÍA EDOMÉX DETUVIERON A INDIVIDUO SEÑALADO COMO GENERADOR DE VIOLENCIA RELACIONADO A GRUPO DELINCUENCIAL CON ORÍGENES EN MICHOACÁN
INDIVIDUO QUE PRESUMIBLEMENTE SE OSTENTABA COMO SERVIDOR PÚBLICO DE LA SECRETARÍA DE FINANZAS DEL GOBIERNO DEL EDOMÉX, VINCULADO A PROCESO POR EXTORSIÓN
En esta segunda entrega, el periódico Tierra se adentra en la operación «Inherent Resolve», una de las dos en las que participa el Ejército de Tierra en Irak. Personal de las Fuerzas Aeromóviles del Ejército de Tierra y del Mando de Operaciones Especiales forman parte de la coalición internacional para la lucha contra el Dáesh.
Transcripción. S.E. el Presidente de la República, Gabriel Boric Font, realiz...Andrés Retamales
Transcripción. S.E. el Presidente de la República, Gabriel Boric Font, realiza Cuenta Pública 2024 [1 de junio de 2024].
Disponible en:
https://prensa.presidencia.cl/lfi-content/uploads/2024/06/01.06.2024-cuenta-publica-ante-congreso-nacional.docx.pdf
Este documento presenta una guía para encontrar soluciones a problemas complejos. Explica qué es un problema público, cómo podríamos definir un problema público, cómo podríamos definir un problema público de forma innovadora, cómo podríamos resolver un problema público con herramientas de pensamiento sistémico, sistemas complejos y pensamiento sistémico: ¿con qué herramientas contamos?
Con esta píldora formativa podrás comprender cómo implementar herramientas como el Arco del proceso de resolución de problemas (Beth S. Noveck / The GovLab), GovLab's Public Problem Solving Canvas o la Guía Un conjunto de herramientas introductorias al pensamiento sistémico para funcionarios públicos del Government Office for Science del Gobierno de Reino Unido.
1. 244/2022
CATEA FGJEM UN INMUEBLE EN IXTLAHUACA EN DONDE ASEGURA ARMAS DE FUEGO Y
CARTUCHOS ÚTILES DE DIVERSOS CALIBRES
Ixtlahuaca, Estado de México, 22 de febrero de 2022.- Agentes de la Fiscalía Regional de Atlacomulco de
esta Fiscalía General de Justicia Estatal (FGJEM) catearon un inmueble en este municipio, donde fueron halladas
cuatro armas de fuego, 140 cartuchos útiles de diversos calibres, además fue detenido un sujeto identificado
como Rogelio “N” de 55 años.
Como parte de una investigación iniciada por esta Institución sobre inmuebles al parecer utilizados para
la comisión de hechos delictivos en esta región de la entidad, el Ministerio Público solicitó a un Juez librar una
orden de cateo para una vivienda ubicada en la colonia San Andrés del Pedregal, en el municipio de Ixtlahuaca.
Este mandamiento judicial fue otorgado, por ello personal de la FGJEM se trasladó al sitio, en donde fue
hallado lo siguiente:
Una escopeta calibre 20 mm
Un arma de fuego tipo revólver calibre .38 especial
Un arma de fuego tipo escuadra calibre .380 con un cargador abastecido
Un arma de fuego tipo escuadra calibre ,9 mm con dos cargadores
Tres cargadores para arma 38 súper
Un cargador para arma calibre .45 mm
Un cargador para arma calibre .380 mm
50 cartuchos útiles calibre 357 mm
24 cartuchos útiles calibre 38 súper
4 cartuchos útiles calibre 20 mm
5 cartuchos útiles calibre 12 mm
2 cartuchos útiles calibre de 7.62 mm
7 cartuchos calibre 3.57 mm
18 cartuchos útiles calibre .38 especial
4 cartuchos útiles calibre .45 mm
2. 2 cartuchos útiles calibre 38 súper
9 cartuchos calibre 7.63 mm
7 cartuchos útiles para arma larga
8 cartuchos útiles calibre 9 mm
Durante esta diligencia fue detenido Rogelio “N”, quien fue presentado ante el Agente del Ministerio
Público, quien habrá de determinar su situación legal, sin embargo, se le debe considerar inocente hasta que sea
dictada una sentencia condenatoria en su contra.
La Fiscalía General de Justicia estatal hace un llamado a la ciudadanía para que denuncie cualquier hecho
delictivo a través del correo electrónico cerotolerancia@edomex.gob.mx, al número telefónico 800 7028770, o
bien, por medio de la aplicación FGJEdomex, la cual está disponible de manera gratuita para todos los teléfonos
inteligentes de los sistemas iOS y Android.
oo0oo