The document discusses capacity building for online and blended learning in Europe. It introduces the European Digital Competence frameworks for learners (DigComp) and educators (DigCompEdu). DigComp defines five areas of digital competence and specific competences within each area. DigCompEdu describes what it means for educators to be digitally competent across six competence areas and six proficiency levels. The frameworks provide a shared understanding of digital competence and are used in various ways, such as curriculum development and teacher training.
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
Digital Competence frameworks DigComp & DigCompEdu
1. Capacity building for online and blended
learning: European Digital Competence
frameworks for learners and educators
Yves Punie, PhD
Deputy Head of Unit Human Capital & Employment
JRC Sevilla
ALO final conference, 11 October 2018, Brussels
@yves998
2. European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC)
• Internal science and knowledge service of
the Commission
• JRC mission is to support EU policies with
independent evidence throughout the whole
policy cycle
• Policy neutral: has no policy agenda of its
own
• Work for more than 20 EC policy
departments
3. - Digital skills challenges
- European policy context
- DigComp: European Digital Competence framework
- DigCompEdu: European Digital Competence framework for Educators
Content
4. • About 70 million Europeans lack sufficient reading, writing and numeracy skills
• 24% of EU population has no upper secondary education diploma
• 13% of Europeans have never used the Internet
• 43% of EU population and 35% of UE labour force have insufficient digital skills
• 42% of those with no digital skills are unemployed
• Digital natives ≠ digital competence
References: DESI Report 2018 – Human Capital; 2017 Education and Training monitor, 2016 Skills Communication, ICILS 2013
Main (digital) skills challenges in Europe
5. MOOCs & Digital Skills
MOOCKnowledge pilot data on MOOC learners. N=1910
Castaño Muñoz, J., Kreijns, K., Kalz, M., & Punie, Y. (2017). Does
digital competence and occupational setting influence MOOC
participation? Evidence from a cross-course survey. Journal of
Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 28-46. doi:
10.1007/s12528-016-9123-z
6. PISA 2015
• Students' perceived digital competence is positively
associated with achievement, particularly when they
are more frequently exposed to enquiry-based
instruction at school.
• Rodrigues, M. (forthcoming), Digital competence,
use of digital technologies and students' achivement:
Do instruction practices play a role? (JRC Science
for Policy report)
None to few lessons
Some to many lessons
Most to all lessons
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Most to all
lessons Some to many
lessons None to few
lessons
5.9
5.3
5.3
5.5
7.4
5.7
5.1
9.3 9.6
Enquiry-Based
Instruction
Teacher-Directed
Instruction
Association between digital competence and
achievement in science
7. • 2018 Digital Education Action Plan {COM(2018) 22 final}
• 2018 Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning {COM (2018) 24 final}
• 2017 COM on school development and excellent teaching for a great start in life {ST 9009 2018 INIT}
• 2017 COM on a Renewed European agenda for Higher Education {COM(2017) 247 final}
• 2016 New Skills Agenda {COM(2016) 381 final}
• Digital Single Market initiative
=> JRC: Digital Competence frameworks (DigComp, DigCompEdu, DigCompOrg SELFIE, EntreComp,
OpenEdu)
Digital Skills and digital learning challenges also high on European agenda
8. What?
• A competence framework defining and describing key competences, proficiency levels and "knowledge, skills and attitudes"
examples
Why?
• Provide an overall, complete and shared understanding of what is DC
Method:
• Strong scientific underpinning
• Consensus building with multiple stakeholders
• Updating and revising
Multiple uses:
• Curricula review, teacher training, (self-)assessment/reflection, policies, practical initiatives, jobseekers, certification,
measurement (E.g. DESI indicators), etc...
DigComp: European Digital Competence framework
9. DigComp (JRC & DG EMPL)
Digital Competence involves confident, critical and responsible use of, and engagement with the full
range of digital technologies for learning, at work, and for participation in society
(Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning, 22 May 2018, ST 9009 2018 INIT)
10. Competence areas Competences
1. Information and data
literacy
1.1 Browsing, searching and filtering data, information and digital content
1.2 Evaluating data, information and digital content
1.3 Managing data, information and digital content
2. Communication and
collaboration
2.1 Interacting through digital technologies
2.2 Sharing through digital technologies
2.3 Engaging in citizenship through digital technologies
2.4 Collaborating through digital technologies
2.5 Netiquette
2.6 Managing digital identity
3. Digital content creation 3.1 Developing digital content
3.2 Integrating and re-elaborating digital content
3.3 Copyright and licences
3.4 Programming
4. Safety 4.1 Protecting devices
4.2 Protecting personal data and privacy
4.3 Protecting health and well-being
4.4 Protecting the environment
5. Problem solving 5.1 Solving technical problems
5.2 Identifying needs and technological responses
5.3 Creatively using digital technologies
5.4 Identifying digital competence gaps
11.
12. DigComp into Action: get inspired, make it happen
• A guide for stakeholders addressing digital skills
• It explains DigComp and how it is used
• It provides 38 examples of use, across
• Formal education & training
• Lifelong learning and social inclusion
• Employability and employment
• An opportunity to learn from each other2.680 downloads June-July 2018
38.000 DigComp downloads since 2017
14. DigCompEdu
• Published November 2017
• 7.800 downloads first half of 2018
• Describes what it means for educators to be
digitally competent
• Educators at all educational levels
• 6 Competence areas – 22 competences – 6
proficiency levels
16. 3. Teaching and Learning
In a traditional classroom, 3.1 could be the most important competence
To plan for and implement digital devices and resources into the teaching
process, so as to enhance the effectiveness of teaching interventions. To
appropriately manage and orchestrate digital teaching interventions. To
experiment with and develop new formats and pedagogical methods for
instruction.
18. Digital Resources
Finding, creating and
sharing resources that
are tailored to the
learning context and
individual learners'
needs
2. Digital resources
20. Making learners fit for life in the digital age
5. Facilitating Learners' Digital Competence
21. Opening up communication and collaboration strategies, within and beyond the organisation
Enhancing and developing pedagogical competences
1. Professional engagement
22. Competence
Progression
Not everyone can be / should be expert or pioneer
Self-reflection allows for understanding one's strength and weaknesses, to look for training and to
improve proficiency in some competences
Current JRC work: self-reflection and self-assessment instrument
Proficiency levels
Does the association between digital competence and achievement differ depending on which combination of instruction practices is employed in the science classroom?
The association between the ICT competence level and science achievement is positive regardless of the instruction category, but the strength of that association does differ.
In particular, a higher level of ICT competence is more strongly associated with achievement if enquiry-based practices are used in 'most to all lessons' and teacher-directed instruction is used with moderation ('none to few lessons' or 'some to many lessons').
In these cases, a one standard-deviation increase in the ICT competence level is associated with a higher achievement in the science test, of around 10 PISA points.
These results suggest that when students are more frequently exposed to enquiry-based instruction the returns to their perceived ICT competence on science achievement are higher.
As hypothesized before, an explanation for this result could be that enquiry-based instruction promotes relevant skills that make digital competence more effective in improving learning outcomes. For instance, there is evidence that enquiry-based strategies improve enquiry-based skills, critical thinking and reasoning skills. Hence, students are better in raising questions, finding data, reasoning and discussing about their findings which may give them an advantage when using their digital competence in learning activities.
Based on the reference conceptual model published in DigComp 2.0, DigComp 2.1 presents 8 proficiency levels and examples of use applied to the learning and employment field.
Originally, proficiency was defined in three levels (basic , intermediate and advance), but time proved the need for a more fine grained progression, of how we learn to swim in the digital ocean.
DigComp 2.1 expands progression to 8 proficency levels, according to increasing
-complexity of tasks
-autonomy of the learner in doing things
-cognitive load
Following Blooms' taxonomy, action verbs (remebering/understanding/applying/creating….) are used to define the progression