2. My first question got a very
good response. Everyone
who answered this question
thought my magazine is
conventional.
3. My second question also received a good response. I got given a
lot of constructive criticisms of how I could improve, and also
some positive feedback.
4. Everyone who answered this question believed that the layout of my
magazine is conventional for a pop magazine. Which was excellent
feedback!
5. All but one of the people that answered this question believe that the images In my
magazine represent a typical pop magazine. This is good feedback, and shows that I
have understood how to make images look effective and conventional.
6. People who answered this question thought my colour and images
were most effective, closely followed by the layout. However the
font didn’t get a very high rating. I now know what the font of my
magazine is what I need to improve on the most.
7. I then asked a final question, ‘how could I improve?.’ The majority of people
that answered this question believed that I could improve on the font, and
perhaps add a consistent colour scheme throughout the entire magazine.