Open Educational Practices: Serving Social Justice & Transforming Pedagogy
•
2 recomendaciones•8,278 vistas
Keynote address at the University of Kansas during Open Education Week on March 30, 2017
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (11)
Destacado
Destacado (15)
Similar a Open Educational Practices: Serving Social Justice & Transforming Pedagogy
Similar a Open Educational Practices: Serving Social Justice & Transforming Pedagogy (20)
Más de Rajiv Jhangiani
Más de Rajiv Jhangiani (20)
Último
Último (20)
Open Educational Practices: Serving Social Justice & Transforming Pedagogy
- 1. Open Educational Practices ServingSocial Justice& TransformingPedagogy University Teaching Fellow & Psychology Instructor, Kwantlen Polytechnic University Senior Open Education Advocacy & Research Fellow, BCcampus Faculty Workshop Facilitator, Open Textbook Network Rajiv Jhangiani, Ph.D. @thatpsychprof
- 2. “higher education shall be equally accessible to all”
- 4. 2.4 million low & moderate-income college-qualified high school graduates could not complete college (2001-10) The Advisory Committee on StudentFinancial Assistance http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529499.pdf
- 5. $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 US Higher Education Funding -‐ $/FTE State Funding Tuition Revenue http://www.sheeo.org
- 6. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Hours @ Minimum Wage Hours of Work Required to Afford Tuition (University of Minnesota)
- 16. 1 Access codes • Eliminate no-cost alternatives • Eliminate low-cost alternatives • Create a direct link between the ability to pay and ability to get good grades
- 17. What can YOU do? • Survey your student body • #textbookbroke campaign • Presentations • Utilize visuals, create displays • Speak directly to faculty & admin • Suggest that faculty review a textbook • Showcase examples • Form a student-led OER group • Connect. Collaborate.
- 18. #TextbookBroke
- 19. #TextbookBroke
- 23. Buy used (if possible) Buy online Resell (if possible) Rent Shared purchase (Inter)library loans Photocopy International edition Old edition
- 24. – University of Minnesota student “I figured French hadn't changed that much”
- 31. 66.5% Not purchase the required textbook 47.6% Take fewer courses 45.5% Not register for a specific course 37.6% Earn a poor grade 26.1% Drop a course 19.8% Fail a course €€€ €€€ €€ €€ € € Florida Virtual Campus. (2016). 2016 student textbook and course materials survey. Tallahassee, FL: Author.
- 32. Revise Remix Retain Redistribute Reuse Source: David Wiley, http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221 March 5, 2014, CC-‐BY open = free + permissions
- 34. Source: Creative Commons, 2015 State of the Commons report
- 35. rijksmuseum.nl
- 38. gutenberg.org
- 40. Not just free or low-cost textbooks Not just digital textbooks
- 41. openstax.org
- 43. open.bccampus.ca
- 46. nobaproject.com
- 47. Source: Creative Commons, 2015 State of the Commons report
- 48. open.umn.edu
- 50. "Opening the Curriculum: Open Education Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014"by I. Elaine Allen & Jeff Seaman, Babson Survey Research Group is licensed under CC BY 4.0 80% 75%
- 51. Below average 3% Average 20% Above average 34% Excellent 43% HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY OF YOUR OPEN TEXTBOOK? Strongly agree 6% Slightly agree 12% Neither 17% Slightly disagree 15% Strongly disagree 50% WOULD YOU HAVE PREFERRED A TRADITIONAL TEXTBOOK? Jhangiani & Jhangiani (2017)
- 52. HOW IMPORTANT TO YOU ARE THE FOLLOWING FEATURES OF YOUR OPEN TEXTBOOK? 12.6 6.7 9.6 7.8 2.9 1 13.6 22.1 15.4 4.9 1 1.9 31.1 20.2 21.2 16.5 10.6 9.6 21.4 26 21.2 32 36.5 26.9 21.4 25 32.7 38.8 49 60.6 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Shareability Permanent retention Option to print Convenience/portability Immediate access Cost savings Not important at all Of little importance Of average importance Very important Absolutely essential Jhangiani & Jhangiani (in press)
- 53. I would not have bought the text book for this course because it's an elective. I would have possibly walked away with a C, now I might actually get an A-‐ It is easily accessible and convenient. Material is easy to understand and follow I personally really like the convenience of having the complete set of chapters on my computer and even accessible from my phone if I need it. I like that I don't have to lug around another text book It's free and it's a great money saver
- 54. 13 Peer Reviewed Studies of Efficacy http://openedgroup.org/
- 56. 95% Same or Better Outcomes http://openedgroup.org/ openedgroup.org/review
- 57. Fischer et al. (2015) • Quasi-‐experimental design • Propensity-‐score matched groups • 16,727 students taking 15 courses at 10 institutions • OER students: • Lower withdrawal rates • More likely to pass with a C-‐ or better • Higher course grades • Enrolled in more courses (current & subsequent semesters) Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson T. J., & Wiley, D. (2015). A multi-‐institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-‐secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159-‐172. doi:10.1007/s12528-‐015-‐9101-‐x
- 58. Jhangiani et al. (under review) Jhangiani, R., Dastur, F., LeGrand, R., & Penner, K. (under review). Introductory psychology textbooks: The roles of online vs. print and open vs. traditional textbooks. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Percent Correct Traditional Open Print Open Digital p < 0.05 ns ns
- 59. “Mad” “Glad” “Sad” “Rad” Cost Completing with C or Better Student Success per Dollar 0 100% $400
- 60. “Mad” “Glad” “Sad” “Rad” Cost Completing with C or Better Commercial Student Success per Dollar 0 100% $400
- 61. “Mad” “Glad” “Sad” “Rad” Cost Completing with C or Better Commercial OER Student Success per Dollar 0 100% $400
- 62. Commercial vs. OER Hilton et al. (2016)
- 63. Cost savings Access Outcomes Adapt, update, & remix Enrolment Persistence Completion
- 66. "Recycling Water Bottles" by Mr.TinDC is licensed under CC BY-‐ND 2.0
- 69. Open Pedagogy: HOW Deeper learning(Farzan & Kraut, 2013) Evaluate and defend credibility of sources (Marentette, 2014) Write more concisely and think more critically (Farzan & Kraut, 2013) Collaborate with students from around the world(Karney, 2012) Provide and receive constructive feedback(Ibrahim, 2012) Enhance digital literacy (Silton, 2012) Communicate ideas to a general audience (APS, 2013)
- 72. 22,000 37,000+ 97% Students who have taken on Wikipedia assignments since 2010 New articles that students have created Instructors who say they will, or plan to, teach with Wikipedia again
- 75. Why have students answer questions when they can write them?
- 77. PM4ID
- 78. Free + Freedom
- 82. "GB Airways A320"by Tony Evans is licensed under CC BY-‐ND 2.0
- 83. "IMG_1007"by Erica is licensed under CC BY 2.0