SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 64
Descargar para leer sin conexión
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute




   T-76.5612 Software Project Management
                Spring 2010

 4: Scheduling, monitoring and controlling software project


                          Tuomas Niinimäki
                  Software Process Research Group
                               SoberIT
                  Helsinki University of Technology




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



What is scheduling?
     Defining the activities needed for certain goal
     Estimating the durations of activities
     Identifying the dependencies between activities
     Sequencing the activities




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                           Resources
Scheduling is builds on ...

                                                    Time           Scope

     Resource management
         Making sure that needed resources are available
     Cost management
         The cost of activities is acceptable
     Specification of deliverables
         The scope and the quality of deliverables is defined



     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute




           Who tells what to do?




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Defining the activities
     Requirements management
         Various stakeholders: customer, end user, marketing, higher
          management, developers, ...
         How to balance between them?

                                                         Resources




                                                  Time           Scope




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Defining the activities
     Setting the quality targets
         Quantity over quality?
         What is the purpose of the developed product?

     What is good enough?
         Medical equipment vs. UI prototype




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute




          How long does it take?




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Estimating the duration
     The relationship between the number of staff working on a
      project, the total effort required and the development time is not
      linear
           Adding more people increases the need for communication and
            management of work activities
           Software project work cannot be partitioned infinitely (Brooks, 1984)




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Effort and schedule – non-linear
     The actual relation between schedule months and person months

                  schedule months = 3.0 * (person months)1/3
                                                                                (McConnell, 1994)

           Example: 65 person-months -> schedule 12 months -> 5-6 developers
                       30

                       25

                       20

                       15                                            Effort
                                                                     Schedule
                       10

                        5

                        0
                            1   3   5   7   9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Estimating the duration
     Only 60-70% of work time is used on “real” work
           General staff meetings
           Talking with colleagues
           Drinking coffee, surfing on the web, ...


           Not all of this is inherently harmful for the project!


     Plan for contingencies
           Sick leaves
           Parental leaves
           Other projects “just borrowing a resource”




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Estimating the duration
     Estimating the schedule may be trivial, but to get a realistic
      schedule accepted can be the most difficult part of the project

                                                            (McConnell, 1994)

     Prepare to have good reasoning behind your schedule estimates
     Do not present overly optimistic schedules
         They will be accepted!
         They will guarantee your project will be late!

     If the schedule is fixed, cut down the scope!




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


The root causes of overly optimistic
schedules
  External, immovable deadline (e.g. Christmas shopping)
  Top management, marketing or a customer want a particular
      deadline, and the project manager can’t talk them out of it
     The project is deliberatelly underestimated by management or
      sales in order to submit a winning bid
     The project manager believes that developers will work harder if
      the schedule is ambitious
     The project begins with a realistic schedule, but new features are
      piled on to the project
     The project is simply estimated poorly
     Developers underestimate an interesting project in order to get
      funding to work on it

                                                           (McConnell, 1994)


     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


The effects of overly optimistic
schedule
     Late project
     Low-quality product
     Stress
     Non-motivated developers
     High turnover; reduced loyalty
     Strained relations among developers, managers,
      customers, marketers and other project stakeholders
     Weakened capacity to develop the next product

                                                      (McConnell, 1994)




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute




                                     Late project




      Extra work                                    Stress




                                     Low quality




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute




       What should we do first?




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Scheduling fixed-scope projects
     Do a work breakdown and effort estimates for the tasks
     Identify task dependencies
         In software development, many tasks are not as dependent
            on each other as they might be in some other engineering
            domains
           With proper interface specification, modules are less
            dependent on each others’ implementation
     Construct a network model, do forward and backward
      pass to identify the critical path
         Activity-on-node network
     Remember to add contingencies!



     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
 Software Business and Engineering Institute



Work breakdown structure

                                        Project


     Specification       Implementation             Testing     Delivery


    Eliciting            Implementing              Testing      Installing
  requirements             module A               module A      software
    Analyzing            Implementing              Testing
                                                                Training
  requirements             module B               module B
  Writing req.           Implementing              Testing
specification doc.         module C               module C
    Creating              Integrating             Integration
architecture plan          modules                  testing
                                                  Acceptance
                                                    testing


    HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Activity-on-node network
   Eliciting            Analyzing           Writing req.                    Creating
 requirements         requirements        specification doc.            architecture plan




                         Testing
 Implementing           module A
   module A                                              Integrating               Integration
                         Testing                          modules                    testing
 Implementing           module B
   module B

                      Implementing             Testing
                        module C              module C




                  Acceptance             Installing
                                                                       Training
                    testing              software


 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
 Software Business and Engineering Institute

                                               Arrows denote the task dependencies
                                               Box length represent the task effort/schedule
Critical path

                        Task 2a             Task 3b


       Task 1        Task 2b                   Task 3b                         Task 4


                                  Task 2c




Time




   HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
 Software Business and Engineering Institute

                                               Arrows denote the task dependencies
                                               Box length represent the task effort/schedule
Critical path                                  Tasks in green are on critical path, i.e. delays
                                               in these tasks delay the entire project!



                        Task 2a             Task 3b


       Task 1        Task 2b                   Task 3b                          Task 4


                                  Task 2c




Time




   HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


Scheduling iterative and incremental
projects
     The understanding of the project increases when the
      project progresses
         We know more what we are supposed to do
         We know better how long it will take
         Customer also knows more what she wants
             Changes are expected
             ... and we are prepared




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


Scheduling iterative and incremental
projects
     In the outset of the project
         Commit to target dates and objectives at macro-level
         Plan the length and number of iterations
     In each iteration
         Explicitly allow the variation of scope
         Plan the next iteration
         Discuss the contents of the project with the stakeholders
              The customer can help in prioritizing the requirements
              Developers can help in estimates


     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Prioritizing the requirements
     Rank requirements by risk, coverage and criticality
         Risk: All risks related to requirements (e.g. technical
          complexity, effort uncertainty)
         Coverage: Major parts of the system are at least
          touched on in the early iterations
         Criticality: High business value (e.g. customer’s
          prioritization)




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



 Monitoring and controlling software project




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

                                              http://flickr.com/photos/jdww/322805530/
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Monitoring and Control
     Monitoring:
         What is happening?
         Compare to the plan
     Control:
         Use monitoring information
         React to slippage
         Replan to bring the project back on target or revise the target




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
      Software Business and Engineering Institute



     Levels of Control
                                                         Project board
              Project board /
              steering group
                                                            Consists of e.g. higher level
                                                             managers and customers
                                                            Progress reports and/or
Control




                                                             meetings, e.g. monthly
                                                            Inform often enough
                                       Information
             Project manager
                                                            Inform about possible problems
                                                             early enough: dividing
                                                             responsibility
                                                            Project manager reports
               Project team                              Project manager & project team
                                                            Meetings and/or progress
                                                             reports, e.g. weekly or even daily
          HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Reporting Progress
     Achievements in reporting                   Avoid ‘information
      period: finished tasks                       overload’
     Future outlook: Planned tasks,                  When information goes
      how things are likely to progress               to higher management
      during next period                              levels summarize more
     Problems encountered                        Use visualizations
         Focus on real problems -                    graphical representation
             exceptions to planned activity           high-light problem
     Costs - actual costs compared to                cases e.g. RAG
      budgeted (earned value)                         indicators
     Staffing - joiners, leavers, sickness
      etc.
     Risk monitoring – Top-10 Risks
     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Collecting Information
     Sources of data
         Checkpoint meetings
         Time sheets
         Machine generated
          statistics
         Configuration
          management data
         Internal documents, e.g.,
          error reports
         Informal communication


     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute




      What does “done” mean?




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



What does “done” mean?
     Developer has written 250 lines of code for a program that was
      estimated to require 500 lines of code
     Why would it be unreasonable to assume that the task is 50 %
      complete?




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



What does “done” mean? A variation
     90% completion syndrome
         job reported as ‘on time’ until last scheduled week
         job reported as ‘90% complete’ for each remaining week
          until task is completed


     Solution?                                            % complete
                                         100

                                         80

                                         60

                                         40                                        % complete


                                         20

                                          0
                                               1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Solution?
     Define what is a meant by ”a task completed”, e.g.
         Done = developer has tested it                      Definition of Done
         Done = task has been documented & integrated
         Done = customer has accepted the feature
     Control on deliverables: report only finished tasks
         0-100 rule:
             task completion is 0%, unless
             the task is finished = 100% complete
         0-50-100 rule:
             task completion is 0% initially,
             50% when someone is working on it, and
             100% when the task is finished
     Estimation & WBS: small enough tasks (a few hours – a few days)

     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Milestones
     They are the checkpoints                 Define different level
      of the process                            milestones for your project in
     Traditional project                       the beginning of the project
      management technique
                                                   A set of tasks
     Achieving a milestone
                                                   Assign the date
      requires the team to
      accomplish a certain                     Use them to
      predefined set of tasks                      follow the progress
         E.g., between                            synchronize the
          process phases                            stakeholder expectations
         Milestone reviews                         throughout the project life
                                                    cycle

                                                                1                  2
                                                               km                 km
     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   Milestone = virstanpylväs (in Finnish)
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Control Points
     Control points are time-paced, i.e., they occur
      at regular intervals


     For example in Scrum:
         Release cycle, 3 months
         Sprint, 1 month
         Daily scrum meetings
                                                                   Strategic Release Management


                                                                           (R&D Process)

                                                  Release Project Cycle                           3 months


                                         Sprint                                      1 month


     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Measurement
     Measurement is a practice                   Collect suitable amount of
      providing several benefits:                  data
         Status visibility                       Start with a small set of
         ”What you measure is                     measurements
          what you get” – focuses
          activities
                                                  Analyse and give feedback,
                                                   both managers and
         Improves morale – brings                 developers!
          attention to chronic
          problems
         Helps to set realistic                  Use automation
          expectations                            Provide visualizations
         Groundwork for long-term
          process improvement,
          e.g. detecting practices
          that work
     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Visualizing Progress
     Visualization enables to see the project progress quickly and
      notice the possible slippage
     Stakeholders need the transparency of project progress
         Team members -> motivation
         Management        -> possibility to react
         Customer          -> payments

     Several ways to visualize progress:
         Choose the one best suitable for your project
         Update frequently
         React to problems

     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Graphical Representation: Gantt Chart


           SA

           SD1

           SD2

           CDR1

          CDR2

                                                               time
        ‘Slip-chart’ red-line indicates position as of today
        A very uneven line suggests need for rescheduling

 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Traffic-light Assessment
Week                   1     2    3    4      5   6   Comments
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5
Task 6
...


          Red not on plan: recoverable only with difficulty
          Amber not on plan: recoverable
          Green on schedule
  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Post-Its and tasks




                                     http://www.flickr.com/photos/alandd/2119855534/
 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Burn Down Chart
Remaining
work                                                     Reports the amount
                                                          of work remaining
                                                         Update continuously
                                                          (daily)
                                                         Plot across time
                                                         May go up
                                                         Commonly used by
                                                          agile methods



                                                                 Remaining work
                                              Time
                                                                 Estimate


 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Burn Down Chart - explained
Remaining
work
                                     Behind the schedule




             Ahead of the schedule


                                              Time


 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Burn Down Chart - explained
Remaining
work




 Variance from the                   Variance from the
 Plan in days                        Plan in remaining
                                     work




                                              Time


 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
  Software Business and Engineering Institute



 Burn Down Chart - explained
 Remaining
 work    At first, work is
              progressing as
              planned




                                            Work is being done faster
                                            than anticipated
New work gets added or

Planned work is re-estimated
to take more effort




                                                Time


     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Earned value management
     Essential features of any EVM implementation include
         a project plan that identifies work to be accomplished,
         a valuation of planned work, called Planned Value (PV) or
          Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS), and
         pre-defined “earning rules” (also called metrics) to quantify
          the accomplishment of work, called Earned Value (EV) or
          Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP).




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Earned value
     Work Scheduled (WS):
         Work to be done, according by the project plan

     Work Performed (WP):
         Actual work completed

     If WP > WS, project is ahead of the original plan
     If WP < WS, project is running late




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Example
250




200




150

                                                                                      Work scheduled
                                                                                      Work performed
100




50




 0
      1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23




  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
  Software Business and Engineering Institute



 Example – Work scheduled explained
  250
                                             20 days to do it




  200




  150
200 work
items to                                                                                 Work scheduled
be created                                                                               Work performed
  100




   50




    0
        1    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23




    HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
      Software Business and Engineering Institute



     Work performed explained                                                      Original
                                                                                   End date
      250




      200


                                                                                              Extra time
                         Problems are solved,
                                                                                              (3 days)
      150                and project starts to
                                                                                              was needed
                         progress at planned pace
                                                                                                Work scheduled
                                                                                                Work performed
       100
At first, this project is
progressing better
than planned
       50
                                             Around day 7, project faces
                                             some problems, and the pace
                                             is slowed down
        0
             1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23




         HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Earned value, part 2
     Work Scheduled (WS):
         Work to be done, according by the project plan
         Has planned value: Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS)

     Work Performed (WP):
         Actual work completed
         Earned value = Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP)
         Actual expenses = Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP)




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Earned value, part 2
     Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled = BCWS
         = how much money is going to be spent based on the plan

     Budgeted Cost of Work Performed = BCWP
         = Earned Value
         = we plan to charge this money from the completed work
         = the performed work is worth this much money to someone

     Actual Cost of Work Performed = ACWP
         = we have spent this amount of money to get the results we
          have


     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                          What can we say about the
Example                                                                   project based on this chart in
                                                                          general?

                                                                          What is the situation:
2500

                                                                           - at the end (day 18)?

2000
                                                                           - on day 13?




1500

                                                                        Budgeted cost of work scheduled
                                                                        Actual cost of work performed
1000                                                                    Budgeted cost of work performed




500




  0
       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18



  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                          What can we say about the
Example –                                                                 project based on this chart in
                                                                          general?


2500




2000




1500

                                                                        Budgeted cost of work scheduled
                                                                        Actual cost of work performed
1000                                                                    Budgeted cost of work performed




500




  0
       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18



  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                          What can we say about the
Example –                                                                 project based on this chart in
                                                                          general?

                       There are two phases in this project
2500




2000




1500

                                                                        Budgeted cost of work scheduled
                                                                        Actual cost of work performed
1000                                                                    Budgeted cost of work performed




500




  0
       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

               First phase (plan)              Second phase (plan)
  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                          What can we say about the
Example –                                                                 project based on this chart in
                                                                          general?

                       The start of second phase was delayed
2500




2000




1500

                                                                        Budgeted cost of work scheduled
                                                                        Actual cost of work performed
1000                                                                    Budgeted cost of work performed




500




  0
       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

               First phase (plan)              Second phase (plan)
  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF First phase
                         TECHNOLOGY                    Second phase
                           (actual)                      (actual)
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                           What is the situation:
Example                                                                     - at the end (day 18)?

2500
                                               All budgeted money was
                                               spent on the project
2000




1500
                       About half of the
                       Value (= features) was                            Budgeted cost of work scheduled
                       Created                                           Actual cost of work performed
1000
                       = SCHEDULE VARIANCE
                                                                         Budgeted cost of work performed
                       (COST)



500

                                                                           The project was 6 days late
                                                                           from the original plan
  0
       1   2   3   4    5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18     = SCHEDULE VARIANCE
                                                                           (TIME)

  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                           What is the situation:
Example
                                                                             - on day 13?
2500



                                                                         Budgeted cost of work scheduled
2000                                                                     Actual cost of work performed
                                                                         Budgeted cost of work performed
               Third of the value (= features) was created
               = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (COST)
1500




1000




500




  0
       1   2    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18



  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                               What is the situation:
Example
                                                                                 - on day 13?
2500



                                                                             Budgeted cost of work scheduled
2000                                                                         Actual cost of work performed
                                                                             Budgeted cost of work performed


1500




1000




500




  0
       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

                                                                        The project was 7 days late
                                                                        from the original plan
  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
                                                                        = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (TIME)
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                          What is the situation:
Example
                                                                            - on day 13?
2500



                                                                        Budgeted cost of work scheduled
2000                                                                    Actual cost of work performed
                                                                        Budgeted cost of work performed

                                                                         The project had spent less
1500
                                                                         Money than planned

                                                                         = BUDGET VARIANCE
1000




500




  0
       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18



  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                          What is the situation:
Example
                                                                            - on day 13?
2500



                                                                        Budgeted cost of work scheduled
2000                                                                    Actual cost of work performed
                                                                        Budgeted cost of work performed


1500




1000
                                                                        The project had spent more
                                                                        than planned to create the
                                                                        value
500
                                                                        = COST VARIANCE

  0
       1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18



  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute


                                                                                What is the situation:
Example
                                                                                  - on day 13?
2500



                                                                              Budgeted cost of work scheduled
2000                                                                          Actual cost of work performed
                                                                              Budgeted cost of work performed
               Third of the value (= features) was created
               = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (COST)                                      The project had spent less
1500
                                                                               Money than planned

                                                                               = BUDGET VARIANCE
1000
                                                                              The project had spent more
                                                                              than planned to create the
                                                                              value
500
                                                                              = COST VARIANCE

  0
       1   2    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

                                                                         The project was 7 days late
                                                                         from the original plan
  HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
                                                                         = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (TIME)
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Earned value, part 3
     Schedule variance:
         Cost: Difference between budgeted cost of work performed
          (BCWP) and budgeted cost of work scheduled (BCWS)
         Time: Difference between now and the date when currently
          completed work should have been completed by the plan
     Cost variance:
         Difference between actual cost of work performed (ACWP)
          and budgeted cost of work performed (BCWP)
     Budget variance:
         Difference between budgeted cost of work scheduled (BCWS)
          and actual cost of work performed (ACWP)



     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
 Software Business and Engineering Institute



 Possible Actions to Recover Project
  Re-schedule
  Make more resources available
  Redefine scope – leave some features to next versions
  Modify quality requirements
  Enhance productivity e.g. through training, tools




   HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute



Important in Monitoring and Control
     Plan monitoring and control                 Pay attention to terms used:
      practices in the beginning of                  Use HOURS when talking
      the project                                     about efforts
     Monitor the progress very                      Use DATES when talking
      frequently, e.g. daily or                       about schedule
      weekly                                         Do not mix estimated
     Give immediate feedback to                      efforts and calendar
         managers                                    time!!!
         team members
     React to deviations fast




     HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
SoberIT
Software Business and Engineering Institute




                          Thank you.

                          Questions?
                             Tuomas Niinimäki

                   tuomas.niinimaki@soberit.hut.fi




 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)
Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)
Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)love7love
 
Software Project Estimation
Software Project EstimationSoftware Project Estimation
Software Project EstimationFrank Vogelezang
 
Project Evaluation and Estimation in Software Development
Project Evaluation and Estimation in Software DevelopmentProject Evaluation and Estimation in Software Development
Project Evaluation and Estimation in Software DevelopmentProf Ansari
 
Software Project Management (SPM)
Software Project Management (SPM)Software Project Management (SPM)
Software Project Management (SPM)Shahid Riaz
 
MG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENTMG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENTKathirvel Ayyaswamy
 
Introduction to Software Cost Estimation
Introduction to Software Cost EstimationIntroduction to Software Cost Estimation
Introduction to Software Cost EstimationHemanth Raj
 
Project-Planning
Project-PlanningProject-Planning
Project-PlanningRon Drew
 
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project Report
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project ReportSOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project Report
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project ReportSai Charan
 
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPT
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPTSOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPT
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPTSai Charan
 
Software Project Management
Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management
Software Project ManagementNoorHameed6
 
Software Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project Management
Software Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project Management
Software Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project ManagementAhsan Rahim
 
Software Project Management
Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management
Software Project Managementasim78
 
Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)
Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)
Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)Jags Jagdish
 

La actualidad más candente (19)

Guide to Software Estimation
Guide to Software EstimationGuide to Software Estimation
Guide to Software Estimation
 
Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)
Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)
Lecture 9 (02-06-2011)
 
Software Project Estimation
Software Project EstimationSoftware Project Estimation
Software Project Estimation
 
Project Evaluation and Estimation in Software Development
Project Evaluation and Estimation in Software DevelopmentProject Evaluation and Estimation in Software Development
Project Evaluation and Estimation in Software Development
 
Spm unit1
Spm unit1Spm unit1
Spm unit1
 
Software Project Management (SPM)
Software Project Management (SPM)Software Project Management (SPM)
Software Project Management (SPM)
 
SE chapters 24-25
SE chapters 24-25SE chapters 24-25
SE chapters 24-25
 
MG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENTMG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MG6088 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
 
Introduction to Software Cost Estimation
Introduction to Software Cost EstimationIntroduction to Software Cost Estimation
Introduction to Software Cost Estimation
 
Project-Planning
Project-PlanningProject-Planning
Project-Planning
 
Spm unit 1
Spm unit 1Spm unit 1
Spm unit 1
 
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project Report
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project ReportSOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project Report
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL Project Report
 
Software Project Management by Dr. B. J. Mohite
Software Project Management by Dr. B. J. MohiteSoftware Project Management by Dr. B. J. Mohite
Software Project Management by Dr. B. J. Mohite
 
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPT
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPTSOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPT
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL PPT
 
Software Project Management
Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management
Software Project Management
 
Software Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project Management
Software Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project Management
Software Project Management | An Overview of the Software Project Management
 
Software Project Management
Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management
Software Project Management
 
Cost estimation
Cost estimationCost estimation
Cost estimation
 
Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)
Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)
Pert cpm-1226075768298180-8 (1)
 

Destacado

Software metrics sucess, failures and new directions
Software metrics sucess, failures and new directionsSoftware metrics sucess, failures and new directions
Software metrics sucess, failures and new directionsAndrws Vieira
 
Project Scheduling & Tracking
Project Scheduling & TrackingProject Scheduling & Tracking
Project Scheduling & TrackingFahim Tuhin
 
Reliability growth models for quality management
Reliability growth models for quality managementReliability growth models for quality management
Reliability growth models for quality managementRoy Antony Arnold G
 
Project scheduling and tracking
Project scheduling and trackingProject scheduling and tracking
Project scheduling and trackingyenohhoney
 
Software Project Management
Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management
Software Project ManagementAyaz Shariff
 
Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)
Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)
Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)Neeraj Kansal
 

Destacado (8)

Software metrics sucess, failures and new directions
Software metrics sucess, failures and new directionsSoftware metrics sucess, failures and new directions
Software metrics sucess, failures and new directions
 
Bai giang-spm-11mar14
Bai giang-spm-11mar14Bai giang-spm-11mar14
Bai giang-spm-11mar14
 
Project Scheduling & Tracking
Project Scheduling & TrackingProject Scheduling & Tracking
Project Scheduling & Tracking
 
Reliability growth models for quality management
Reliability growth models for quality managementReliability growth models for quality management
Reliability growth models for quality management
 
Slides chapters 24-25
Slides chapters 24-25Slides chapters 24-25
Slides chapters 24-25
 
Project scheduling and tracking
Project scheduling and trackingProject scheduling and tracking
Project scheduling and tracking
 
Software Project Management
Software Project ManagementSoftware Project Management
Software Project Management
 
Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)
Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)
Software engineering project on gps based Bus management system (GPS BMS)
 

Similar a 4 Scheduling Monitoring

Chapter 2 Software Process.pptx
Chapter 2 Software Process.pptxChapter 2 Software Process.pptx
Chapter 2 Software Process.pptxRayonJ1
 
Se chapter 1,2,3 2 mark qa
Se chapter 1,2,3   2 mark  qaSe chapter 1,2,3   2 mark  qa
Se chapter 1,2,3 2 mark qaAruna M
 
Scr Position Paper For Chi 04 Workshop
Scr Position Paper For Chi 04 WorkshopScr Position Paper For Chi 04 Workshop
Scr Position Paper For Chi 04 WorkshopArnold Rudorfer
 
02 architectures in_context
02 architectures in_context02 architectures in_context
02 architectures in_contextMajong DevJfu
 
Conventional and Object Oriented Software Engineering
Conventional and Object Oriented Software EngineeringConventional and Object Oriented Software Engineering
Conventional and Object Oriented Software Engineeringssrkai2020
 
Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...
Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...
Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...Mayank Baheti
 
Measurement-Based Software Engineering Education
Measurement-Based Software Engineering EducationMeasurement-Based Software Engineering Education
Measurement-Based Software Engineering Educationijcnes
 
IT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptx
IT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptxIT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptx
IT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptxMAHASREEM
 
Managing Agile Software Development Projects
Managing Agile Software Development ProjectsManaging Agile Software Development Projects
Managing Agile Software Development ProjectsMartina Šimičić
 
Software engineering fundamental
Software engineering fundamentalSoftware engineering fundamental
Software engineering fundamentalDr.Bechoo Lal
 
Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...
Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...
Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
 
Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710Nikhil Todkar
 
Open source evolution analysis
Open source evolution analysisOpen source evolution analysis
Open source evolution analysisIzzat Alsmadi
 
Using Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product Requirements
Using Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product RequirementsUsing Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product Requirements
Using Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product RequirementsArnold Rudorfer
 
Lukito Edi Nugroho - Information System Engineering
Lukito Edi Nugroho - Information System EngineeringLukito Edi Nugroho - Information System Engineering
Lukito Edi Nugroho - Information System Engineeringbelajarkomputer
 

Similar a 4 Scheduling Monitoring (20)

2 Process
2 Process2 Process
2 Process
 
8 Project Plan
8 Project Plan8 Project Plan
8 Project Plan
 
5 Quality
5 Quality5 Quality
5 Quality
 
Chapter 2 Software Process.pptx
Chapter 2 Software Process.pptxChapter 2 Software Process.pptx
Chapter 2 Software Process.pptx
 
Se chapter 1,2,3 2 mark qa
Se chapter 1,2,3   2 mark  qaSe chapter 1,2,3   2 mark  qa
Se chapter 1,2,3 2 mark qa
 
Scr Position Paper For Chi 04 Workshop
Scr Position Paper For Chi 04 WorkshopScr Position Paper For Chi 04 Workshop
Scr Position Paper For Chi 04 Workshop
 
02 architectures in_context
02 architectures in_context02 architectures in_context
02 architectures in_context
 
Conventional and Object Oriented Software Engineering
Conventional and Object Oriented Software EngineeringConventional and Object Oriented Software Engineering
Conventional and Object Oriented Software Engineering
 
WBS PROJECT
WBS PROJECTWBS PROJECT
WBS PROJECT
 
Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...
Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...
Reliability study and analysis on open source enterprise resource planning so...
 
Measurement-Based Software Engineering Education
Measurement-Based Software Engineering EducationMeasurement-Based Software Engineering Education
Measurement-Based Software Engineering Education
 
IT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptx
IT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptxIT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptx
IT project management-IT project management-Unit-2.pptx
 
Managing Agile Software Development Projects
Managing Agile Software Development ProjectsManaging Agile Software Development Projects
Managing Agile Software Development Projects
 
Software engineering fundamental
Software engineering fundamentalSoftware engineering fundamental
Software engineering fundamental
 
Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...
Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...
Software Architecture - Allocation taxonomies: building, deployment and distr...
 
Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710
 
20 54-1-pb
20 54-1-pb20 54-1-pb
20 54-1-pb
 
Open source evolution analysis
Open source evolution analysisOpen source evolution analysis
Open source evolution analysis
 
Using Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product Requirements
Using Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product RequirementsUsing Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product Requirements
Using Evolutionary Prototypes To Formalize Product Requirements
 
Lukito Edi Nugroho - Information System Engineering
Lukito Edi Nugroho - Information System EngineeringLukito Edi Nugroho - Information System Engineering
Lukito Edi Nugroho - Information System Engineering
 

4 Scheduling Monitoring

  • 1. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute T-76.5612 Software Project Management Spring 2010 4: Scheduling, monitoring and controlling software project Tuomas Niinimäki Software Process Research Group SoberIT Helsinki University of Technology HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 2. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What is scheduling?   Defining the activities needed for certain goal   Estimating the durations of activities   Identifying the dependencies between activities   Sequencing the activities HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 3. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Resources Scheduling is builds on ... Time Scope   Resource management   Making sure that needed resources are available   Cost management   The cost of activities is acceptable   Specification of deliverables   The scope and the quality of deliverables is defined HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 4. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Who tells what to do? HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 5. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Defining the activities   Requirements management   Various stakeholders: customer, end user, marketing, higher management, developers, ...   How to balance between them? Resources Time Scope HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 6. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Defining the activities   Setting the quality targets   Quantity over quality?   What is the purpose of the developed product?   What is good enough?   Medical equipment vs. UI prototype HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 7. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute How long does it take? HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 8. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Estimating the duration   The relationship between the number of staff working on a project, the total effort required and the development time is not linear   Adding more people increases the need for communication and management of work activities   Software project work cannot be partitioned infinitely (Brooks, 1984) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 9. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Effort and schedule – non-linear   The actual relation between schedule months and person months schedule months = 3.0 * (person months)1/3 (McConnell, 1994)   Example: 65 person-months -> schedule 12 months -> 5-6 developers 30 25 20 15 Effort Schedule 10 5 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 10. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Estimating the duration   Only 60-70% of work time is used on “real” work   General staff meetings   Talking with colleagues   Drinking coffee, surfing on the web, ...   Not all of this is inherently harmful for the project!   Plan for contingencies   Sick leaves   Parental leaves   Other projects “just borrowing a resource” HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 11. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Estimating the duration   Estimating the schedule may be trivial, but to get a realistic schedule accepted can be the most difficult part of the project (McConnell, 1994)   Prepare to have good reasoning behind your schedule estimates   Do not present overly optimistic schedules   They will be accepted!   They will guarantee your project will be late!   If the schedule is fixed, cut down the scope! HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 12. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute The root causes of overly optimistic schedules   External, immovable deadline (e.g. Christmas shopping)   Top management, marketing or a customer want a particular deadline, and the project manager can’t talk them out of it   The project is deliberatelly underestimated by management or sales in order to submit a winning bid   The project manager believes that developers will work harder if the schedule is ambitious   The project begins with a realistic schedule, but new features are piled on to the project   The project is simply estimated poorly   Developers underestimate an interesting project in order to get funding to work on it (McConnell, 1994) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 13. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute The effects of overly optimistic schedule   Late project   Low-quality product   Stress   Non-motivated developers   High turnover; reduced loyalty   Strained relations among developers, managers, customers, marketers and other project stakeholders   Weakened capacity to develop the next product (McConnell, 1994) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 14. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Late project Extra work Stress Low quality HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 15. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What should we do first? HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 16. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Scheduling fixed-scope projects   Do a work breakdown and effort estimates for the tasks   Identify task dependencies   In software development, many tasks are not as dependent on each other as they might be in some other engineering domains   With proper interface specification, modules are less dependent on each others’ implementation   Construct a network model, do forward and backward pass to identify the critical path   Activity-on-node network   Remember to add contingencies! HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 17. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Work breakdown structure Project Specification Implementation Testing Delivery Eliciting Implementing Testing Installing requirements module A module A software Analyzing Implementing Testing Training requirements module B module B Writing req. Implementing Testing specification doc. module C module C Creating Integrating Integration architecture plan modules testing Acceptance testing HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 18. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Activity-on-node network Eliciting Analyzing Writing req. Creating requirements requirements specification doc. architecture plan Testing Implementing module A module A Integrating Integration Testing modules testing Implementing module B module B Implementing Testing module C module C Acceptance Installing Training testing software HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 19. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Arrows denote the task dependencies Box length represent the task effort/schedule Critical path Task 2a Task 3b Task 1 Task 2b Task 3b Task 4 Task 2c Time HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 20. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Arrows denote the task dependencies Box length represent the task effort/schedule Critical path Tasks in green are on critical path, i.e. delays in these tasks delay the entire project! Task 2a Task 3b Task 1 Task 2b Task 3b Task 4 Task 2c Time HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 21. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Scheduling iterative and incremental projects   The understanding of the project increases when the project progresses   We know more what we are supposed to do   We know better how long it will take   Customer also knows more what she wants   Changes are expected   ... and we are prepared HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 22. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Scheduling iterative and incremental projects   In the outset of the project   Commit to target dates and objectives at macro-level   Plan the length and number of iterations   In each iteration   Explicitly allow the variation of scope   Plan the next iteration   Discuss the contents of the project with the stakeholders   The customer can help in prioritizing the requirements   Developers can help in estimates HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 23. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Prioritizing the requirements   Rank requirements by risk, coverage and criticality   Risk: All risks related to requirements (e.g. technical complexity, effort uncertainty)   Coverage: Major parts of the system are at least touched on in the early iterations   Criticality: High business value (e.g. customer’s prioritization) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 24. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Monitoring and controlling software project HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY http://flickr.com/photos/jdww/322805530/
  • 25. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Monitoring and Control   Monitoring:   What is happening?   Compare to the plan   Control:   Use monitoring information   React to slippage   Replan to bring the project back on target or revise the target HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 26. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Levels of Control   Project board Project board / steering group   Consists of e.g. higher level managers and customers   Progress reports and/or Control meetings, e.g. monthly   Inform often enough Information Project manager   Inform about possible problems early enough: dividing responsibility   Project manager reports Project team   Project manager & project team   Meetings and/or progress reports, e.g. weekly or even daily HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 27. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Reporting Progress   Achievements in reporting   Avoid ‘information period: finished tasks overload’   Future outlook: Planned tasks,   When information goes how things are likely to progress to higher management during next period levels summarize more   Problems encountered   Use visualizations   Focus on real problems -   graphical representation exceptions to planned activity   high-light problem   Costs - actual costs compared to cases e.g. RAG budgeted (earned value) indicators   Staffing - joiners, leavers, sickness etc.   Risk monitoring – Top-10 Risks HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 28. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Collecting Information   Sources of data   Checkpoint meetings   Time sheets   Machine generated statistics   Configuration management data   Internal documents, e.g., error reports   Informal communication HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 29. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What does “done” mean? HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 30. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What does “done” mean?   Developer has written 250 lines of code for a program that was estimated to require 500 lines of code   Why would it be unreasonable to assume that the task is 50 % complete? HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 31. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What does “done” mean? A variation   90% completion syndrome   job reported as ‘on time’ until last scheduled week   job reported as ‘90% complete’ for each remaining week until task is completed   Solution? % complete 100 80 60 40 % complete 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 32. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Solution?   Define what is a meant by ”a task completed”, e.g.   Done = developer has tested it Definition of Done   Done = task has been documented & integrated   Done = customer has accepted the feature   Control on deliverables: report only finished tasks   0-100 rule:   task completion is 0%, unless   the task is finished = 100% complete   0-50-100 rule:   task completion is 0% initially,   50% when someone is working on it, and   100% when the task is finished   Estimation & WBS: small enough tasks (a few hours – a few days) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 33. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Milestones   They are the checkpoints   Define different level of the process milestones for your project in   Traditional project the beginning of the project management technique   A set of tasks   Achieving a milestone   Assign the date requires the team to accomplish a certain   Use them to predefined set of tasks   follow the progress   E.g., between   synchronize the process phases stakeholder expectations   Milestone reviews throughout the project life cycle 1 2 km km HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Milestone = virstanpylväs (in Finnish)
  • 34. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Control Points   Control points are time-paced, i.e., they occur at regular intervals   For example in Scrum:   Release cycle, 3 months   Sprint, 1 month   Daily scrum meetings Strategic Release Management (R&D Process) Release Project Cycle 3 months Sprint 1 month HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 35. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Measurement   Measurement is a practice   Collect suitable amount of providing several benefits: data   Status visibility   Start with a small set of   ”What you measure is measurements what you get” – focuses activities   Analyse and give feedback, both managers and   Improves morale – brings developers! attention to chronic problems   Helps to set realistic   Use automation expectations   Provide visualizations   Groundwork for long-term process improvement, e.g. detecting practices that work HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 36. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Visualizing Progress   Visualization enables to see the project progress quickly and notice the possible slippage   Stakeholders need the transparency of project progress   Team members -> motivation   Management -> possibility to react   Customer -> payments   Several ways to visualize progress:   Choose the one best suitable for your project   Update frequently   React to problems HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 37. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Graphical Representation: Gantt Chart SA SD1 SD2 CDR1 CDR2 time ‘Slip-chart’ red-line indicates position as of today A very uneven line suggests need for rescheduling HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 38. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Traffic-light Assessment Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 Comments Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 ...   Red not on plan: recoverable only with difficulty   Amber not on plan: recoverable   Green on schedule HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 39. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Post-Its and tasks http://www.flickr.com/photos/alandd/2119855534/ HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 40. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Burn Down Chart Remaining work   Reports the amount of work remaining   Update continuously (daily)   Plot across time   May go up   Commonly used by agile methods Remaining work Time Estimate HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 41. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Burn Down Chart - explained Remaining work Behind the schedule Ahead of the schedule Time HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 42. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Burn Down Chart - explained Remaining work Variance from the Variance from the Plan in days Plan in remaining work Time HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 43. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Burn Down Chart - explained Remaining work At first, work is progressing as planned Work is being done faster than anticipated New work gets added or Planned work is re-estimated to take more effort Time HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 44. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Earned value management   Essential features of any EVM implementation include   a project plan that identifies work to be accomplished,   a valuation of planned work, called Planned Value (PV) or Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS), and   pre-defined “earning rules” (also called metrics) to quantify the accomplishment of work, called Earned Value (EV) or Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP). HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 45. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Earned value   Work Scheduled (WS):   Work to be done, according by the project plan   Work Performed (WP):   Actual work completed   If WP > WS, project is ahead of the original plan   If WP < WS, project is running late HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 46. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Example 250 200 150 Work scheduled Work performed 100 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 47. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Example – Work scheduled explained 250 20 days to do it 200 150 200 work items to Work scheduled be created Work performed 100 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 48. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Work performed explained Original End date 250 200 Extra time Problems are solved, (3 days) 150 and project starts to was needed progress at planned pace Work scheduled Work performed 100 At first, this project is progressing better than planned 50 Around day 7, project faces some problems, and the pace is slowed down 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 49. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Earned value, part 2   Work Scheduled (WS):   Work to be done, according by the project plan   Has planned value: Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS)   Work Performed (WP):   Actual work completed   Earned value = Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP)   Actual expenses = Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 50. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Earned value, part 2   Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled = BCWS   = how much money is going to be spent based on the plan   Budgeted Cost of Work Performed = BCWP   = Earned Value   = we plan to charge this money from the completed work   = the performed work is worth this much money to someone   Actual Cost of Work Performed = ACWP   = we have spent this amount of money to get the results we have HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 51. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What can we say about the Example project based on this chart in general? What is the situation: 2500 - at the end (day 18)? 2000 - on day 13? 1500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled Actual cost of work performed 1000 Budgeted cost of work performed 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 52. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What can we say about the Example – project based on this chart in general? 2500 2000 1500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled Actual cost of work performed 1000 Budgeted cost of work performed 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 53. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What can we say about the Example – project based on this chart in general? There are two phases in this project 2500 2000 1500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled Actual cost of work performed 1000 Budgeted cost of work performed 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 First phase (plan) Second phase (plan) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 54. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What can we say about the Example – project based on this chart in general? The start of second phase was delayed 2500 2000 1500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled Actual cost of work performed 1000 Budgeted cost of work performed 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 First phase (plan) Second phase (plan) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF First phase TECHNOLOGY Second phase (actual) (actual)
  • 55. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What is the situation: Example - at the end (day 18)? 2500 All budgeted money was spent on the project 2000 1500 About half of the Value (= features) was Budgeted cost of work scheduled Created Actual cost of work performed 1000 = SCHEDULE VARIANCE Budgeted cost of work performed (COST) 500 The project was 6 days late from the original plan 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (TIME) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 56. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What is the situation: Example - on day 13? 2500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled 2000 Actual cost of work performed Budgeted cost of work performed Third of the value (= features) was created = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (COST) 1500 1000 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 57. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What is the situation: Example - on day 13? 2500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled 2000 Actual cost of work performed Budgeted cost of work performed 1500 1000 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 The project was 7 days late from the original plan HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (TIME)
  • 58. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What is the situation: Example - on day 13? 2500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled 2000 Actual cost of work performed Budgeted cost of work performed The project had spent less 1500 Money than planned = BUDGET VARIANCE 1000 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 59. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What is the situation: Example - on day 13? 2500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled 2000 Actual cost of work performed Budgeted cost of work performed 1500 1000 The project had spent more than planned to create the value 500 = COST VARIANCE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 60. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute What is the situation: Example - on day 13? 2500 Budgeted cost of work scheduled 2000 Actual cost of work performed Budgeted cost of work performed Third of the value (= features) was created = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (COST) The project had spent less 1500 Money than planned = BUDGET VARIANCE 1000 The project had spent more than planned to create the value 500 = COST VARIANCE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 The project was 7 days late from the original plan HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY = SCHEDULE VARIANCE (TIME)
  • 61. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Earned value, part 3   Schedule variance:   Cost: Difference between budgeted cost of work performed (BCWP) and budgeted cost of work scheduled (BCWS)   Time: Difference between now and the date when currently completed work should have been completed by the plan   Cost variance:   Difference between actual cost of work performed (ACWP) and budgeted cost of work performed (BCWP)   Budget variance:   Difference between budgeted cost of work scheduled (BCWS) and actual cost of work performed (ACWP) HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 62. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Possible Actions to Recover Project   Re-schedule   Make more resources available   Redefine scope – leave some features to next versions   Modify quality requirements   Enhance productivity e.g. through training, tools HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 63. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Important in Monitoring and Control   Plan monitoring and control   Pay attention to terms used: practices in the beginning of   Use HOURS when talking the project about efforts   Monitor the progress very   Use DATES when talking frequently, e.g. daily or about schedule weekly   Do not mix estimated   Give immediate feedback to efforts and calendar   managers time!!!   team members   React to deviations fast HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • 64. SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute Thank you. Questions? Tuomas Niinimäki tuomas.niinimaki@soberit.hut.fi HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY