Microsoft e VMWare - Entenda as diferenças!
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
5 recomendaciones•5,632 vistas
Nesta apresentação, você poderá conferir a evolução do Hyper-V e da plataforma System Center em relação aos produtos VMware e fazer uma comparação complete dos dois fornecedores.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Similar a Microsoft e VMWare - Entenda as diferenças!
Similar a Microsoft e VMWare - Entenda as diferenças! (20)
Más de Vinícius Apolinário
Último
Último (20)
Microsoft e VMWare - Entenda as diferenças!
- 7. 7
- 14. Funcionalidade Recurso Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V VMware vSphere 5.1 Ent Plus Escalabilidade, Desempenho e Densidade Máquinas virtuais ativas por host 384 1.024 512 Memória por máquina virtual 64 GB 1 TB 1 TB Processadores virtuais por VM 4 64 64 Quantidade máxima de nós por cluster Hyper-V 16 64 32 Quantidade máxima de VMs por cluster Hyper-V 1.000 8.000 3.000 SR-IOV com suporte a Live Migration Não Sim Não Armazenamento Suporte nativo a discos de 4KB Não Sim Não Tamanho máximo do disco virtual 2 TB 64 TB 2 TB Armazenamento criptografado em cluster Não Sim Não Segurança de Multitenancy Extensible Switch aberta (extensível) Não Sim Fechada Medição de recursos Não Sim Requer “chargeback” Flexibilidade de infraestrutura Live Migrations simultâneas em 1GB 1 Ilimitado 4 Live Migrations simultâneas em 10GB 1 Ilimitado 8 Live Storage Migration Não Sim Sim Shared Nothing Live Migration Não Sim Sim Virtualização de rede Não Sim Requer VXLAN Alta disponibilidade Replicação de máquinas virtuais Sim Sim Sim Monitoramento de aplicativos do SO guest Não Sim Apenas API Clusters guest com Live Migration e Memória Dinâmica Sim Sim Não
- 17. Private Cloud Tiers Private Cloud Capability Microsoft VMware Application Management Application Self-Service SystemCenter2012SP1 WindowsServer2012 vCloud Director Application Performance Management vFabric Application Performance Mgr. Application Management across clouds vCloud Director, vCloud Connector Service Delivery & Automation IT Service Management & Service Catalog VMware Service Manager Process Automation & Orchestration vCenter Operations Mgmt. Suite Capacity Management vCenter Orchestrator Infrastructure Management Private Clouds Provisioning and Delegation vCloud Director Data Protection & Disaster Recovery vCenter Site Recovery Manager Monitoring vCenter Operations Mgmt. Suite Configuration & Compliance vCenter Operations Mgmt. Suite Security vShield Endpoint Integration with existing heterogeneous mgmt. tools X Heterogeneous Infra Support - physical & virtual X Multi-hypervisor Management Support X Identity Management X Hypervisor Platform vSphere, vCenter
- 18. Private Cloud Tiers Private Cloud Capability Microsoft VMware Application Management Application Self-Service SystemCenter2012SP1 WindowsServer2012 vCloud Suite 5.1 Application Performance Management vFabric Application Performance Mgr. Application Management across clouds vCloud Suite 5.1 Service Delivery & Automation IT Service Management & Service Catalog VMware Service Manager Process Automation & Orchestration vCloud Suite 5.1 Capacity Management Infrastructure Management Private Clouds Provisioning and Delegation Data Protection & Disaster Recovery Monitoring Configuration & Compliance Security Integration with existing heterogeneous mgmt. tools X Heterogeneous Infra Support - physical & virtual X Multi-hypervisor Management Support X Identity Management X Hypervisor Platform vCloud Suite 5.1
- 19. 1. VMware vCloud Request Manager has been deprecated with customers recommended to upgrade to VMware Service Manager 2. Requires vCloud Director, available at additional cost 3. Each VMware VM template will have it’s own VMDK, even if the template varies only slightly in it’s configuration options. 4. While VMware offer no alternative to Server App-V, vFabric Application Director would allow more granular control over the application layer for certain apps, and provide the ability to deploy multi-tiered services 5. VMware require multiple tools to deliver any form of insight. vCenter Operations will monitor hosts, vFabric Hyperic will monitor applications on physical servers, but simply collects metrics, without providing guidance for remediation. vFabric APM required for insight into a limited number of applications 6. Lab Manager deprecated, with customers expected to upgrade to vCloud Director, which has no connections with Development IDE. 7. vFabric is a platform focused 100% on Spring, Java, and is available at considerable expense, on a per VM basis. Development tools are disconnected from other management tools, and only vFabric APM can provide insight into the applications, available at additional expense.
- 20. KeyLicensingChanges For Highly Virtualized Environments For Lightly or Non-Virtualized Environments 2 System Center 2012 Editions – – – – –
- 21. Enrollment for Core Infrastructure Standard Enrollment for Core Infrastructure Datacenter
Notas del editor
- If we take the private cloud tiers and further break them down into individual capabilities, we can see how SC 2012 SP1 and Windows Server 2012 deliver on various customer requirements. Looking at VMware’s portfolio, they have several products that are required to deliver these capabilities. Further, VMware has no solution for Identity management, heterogeneous infrastructure support, or support for multi-hypervisor environments.
- As we saw earlier, VMware is trying to copy Microsoft’s model of simple licensing through ECI, so they came up with a new SKU called vCloud Suite. But emphasize that this new SKU is a licensing construct with at least 6 products, and 2 of these 6 products are suites, so if we count the total number of individual products, it comes down to around 14 different products in the vCloud Suite. Slide 18 further details the complexity of vCloud Suite.