SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 15
Employee Performance Reviewing Framework
for
Software Development Division
Development Manger
Division Structure
Team Lead
Senior Business Analyst Junior Business AnalystJoiner Software QA Engineer
Internship
Business Analysis
Tier
Salary Band
Bonus %
Probation period
Non
Experienced
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Diploma and equivalent Degree and equivalent
Experienced
1- 2 Years with Paper Qualification 2- 5 Years with Paper Qualification
Employee Tiers
Max Annual
Total Allocation % =Max Bonus % + Max Incentive %+ Max Annual Increment % + Inflation %
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Employee Tiers
Software QA
Non
Experienced
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Diploma and equivalent Degree and equivalent
Experienced
1- 2 Years with Paper Qualification 2- 5 Years with Paper Qualification
Max Annual
Total Allocation % =Max Bonus % + Max Incentive %+ Max Annual Increment % + Inflation %
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Tier
Salary Band
Max Bonus %
Max Incentive %
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
Internship
Tier
Salary Band
Bonus %
Probation period
Requirement
Gathering
• Number of missing requirement (40%)
• Number of rework on or due to unclear or wrong requirement (40%)
Stakeholder
Management
• Customer feedback card rating(40%)
• Number of meeting which covered the meeting objectives (60%)
Change Set
Management
• Number of proposed changes which was rejected after the in-depth analysis (60%)
• Number of iterations (40%)
Business Process Analysis
and Re-engineering
• Number of reengineering which meet the BPR objectives (60%)
• Number of broken business process identified correctly (40%)
Documentation
• Number of standards not followed (30%)
• Number of cross domain not covered (20%)
• Number of not documented valid requirement (20%)
• Number of unclear documentation (30%)
• Number of On-scheduled document deliverable
Deliverables and KPI – Team Leader
Reviewing and
ALM update
• Submitting of release wise QA review report (20%)
• Submitting of scope wise business analysis review report (20%)
• Number of missing ALM schedule update (20%)
• Number of missing communication plan update (20%)
• Number of missing team members weekly review update (20%)
Requirement
Gathering
• Number of missing requirement (40%)
• Number of rework on due to unclear or wrong requirement (40%)
Stakeholder
Management
• Customer feedback card rating(40%)
• Number of meeting which covered the meeting objectives (60%)
Change Set
Management
• Number of proposed changes which was rejected after the in-depth analysis (60%)
• Number of iterations (40%)
Business Process Analysis
and Re-engineering
• Number of reengineering which meet the BPR objectives (60%)
• Number of broken business process identified correctly (40%)
Documentation
• Number of standards not followed (30%)
• Number of cross domain not covered (20%)
• Number of not documented valid requirement (20%)
• Number of unclear documentation (30%)
• Number of On-scheduled document deliverable
Deliverables and KPI – Business Analyst
Th
Requirement
Understanding
Test case
Designing
• Number of missing business rules in test cases (30%)
• Number of missing functional requirement in test cases(30%)
• Number of missing integration teat case (20%)
• Numbers of missing requirement traceability matrix(20%)
Defect
Reporting
Deliverables and KPI – QA
• Number of missing defect (40%)
• Number of valid suggestion (20%)
• % high/critical defects (20%)
• % of Rejected Defects (20%)
• Number of missing business rules(40%)
• Number of missing functional requirement(40%)
• Number of missing non functional requirement(20%)
Submitting of scope wise
business analysis review
report
Submitting of release wise
QA review report
Reviewing and
ALM update
Requirement
Gathering
20%
20%
0 100
Team leader Quarterly Review
Business
Analyzing
Requirement Gathering20%
Stakeholder Management20%
Number of missing ALM
schedule update
Number of missing
communication
plan update
Number of missing
team members
weekly review update
20%
20%
20%
Change Set Management10%
Business Process Analysis
and Re-engineering
30%
Documentation20%
Number of rework
on due to unclear or
wrong requirement
Number of missing
requirement
Requirement
Gathering
Stakeholder
Management
Requirement
Gathering
60%
40%
Customer feedback card
rating
40%
Number of meeting witch
covered the meeting
objectives
60%
Number of standards
not followed
30%
Number of aspect
not covered
Number of missing
requirement
Number of unclear
documentation
20%
20%
30%
Documentation
Business Process
Analyst and
Re-engineering
Change Set
Management
Number of reengineering
which improve the
efficiency of
current process
60%
Number of broken business
process identified correctly
40%
Number of proposed changes
which was rejected after
the in-depth analysis
60%
Number of iterations
40%
10 %
0 100
Business Analyst Quarterly Review
Number of missing
functional requirement
Number of missing
business rules
Requirement
Understanding
Requirement
Gathering
40%
40%
Number of missing
business rules in
test cases
30%
Number of missing
functional requirement
in test cases
Number of missing
integration teat case
Numbers of missing
requirement traceability matrix
30%
20%
20%
Test case
Designing
Defect
Reporting
Number of missing defect40%
Number of valid
suggestion20%
0 100
QA Quarterly Review
Number of missing
non functional requirement
20%
Percentage of
high/critical defects20%
Percentage of
rejected Defects20%
0 100
0 - 80
80 - 90
90 - 100
Quarterly Review
Bonus %
Incentive %
Bonus %
Incentive %
Bonus %
Incentive %
0 100
0 - 80
80 - 90
90 - 100
Annual Review
Basic Salary Increment %
Promotion 0
Inflation %
Review outcome %
Management Decision
%
Basic Salary Increment % 0
Promotion 0
Basic Salary Increment % 0
Promotion 0
0%
0%
0%
1st quarter review
2nd quarter review
3rd quarter review
4th quarter review
How Does It Work
1- 2 Years with paper qualification
Employee Name Jone Values
Tier T1
Position Business Analyst
Current Salary 25000
Salary Band 25000 - 31000
Max Annual Total
Allocation %
15 3750
Max Incentive % 2 500
Max Bonus % 5 1250
Max Annual Increment
based on review
framework %
5 1250
Inflation % 3 750
Max Annual
Total Allocation % =Max Bonus % + Max Incentive %+ Max Annual Increment based on review framework % + Inflation %
Note: This percentage should be decided by the finance department after reviewing the
financial stability of the department
First Review
Result
Contribution
%
Requirement
Gathering
70 30 21
Stakeholder
Management
80 10 8
Change Set
Management
70 10 7
Business Process
Analysis
and Re-
engineering
80 20 18
Documentation 90 30 27
81
Quarterly Review Scale
Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100
Bonus % 0 60 % 100%
Incentive % 0% 60% 100%
81 Description
Bonus 60 % (1250/4)*0.6 =187.50
Incentive 60 % (500/4)*0.6 =75
Quarterly Review Outcome
262.50 $
1st quarter review
Quarterly Review Scale
Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100
Bonus % 0 60 % 100%
Incentive % 0% 60% 100%
75 Description
Bonus 0% 0
Incentive 0 % 0
Quarterly Review Outcome
0 $
2st quarter review
Quarterly Review Scale
Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100
Bonus % 0 60 % 100%
Incentive % 0% 60% 100%
85 Description
Bonus 60 % (1250/4)*0.6 =187.50
Incentive 60 % (500/4)*0.6 =75
Quarterly Review Outcome
262.50 $
3st quarter review
Quarterly Review Scale
Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100
Bonus % 0 60 % 100%
Incentive % 0% 60% 100%
95 Description
Bonus 100 % (1250/4)*1 =312.50
Incentive 1000 % (500/4)*1 =125
Quarterly Review Outcome
437.50$
4st quarter review
81
1st quarter review
75
2st quarter review
85
3st quarter review
95
4st quarter review
25%
25%
25%
25%
20.25
18.75
21.25
23.75
84
Annual Review Outcome Annual Review Scale
Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100
Basic Salary Increment 0 60 % 100%
Promotion
(1250)*0.6 =750
750 $

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado

Destacado (16)

Presentation at EBA 26.04.12
Presentation at EBA 26.04.12Presentation at EBA 26.04.12
Presentation at EBA 26.04.12
 
UX Portfolio
UX PortfolioUX Portfolio
UX Portfolio
 
Presentation: Job performance evaluation as an efficient personnel developmen...
Presentation: Job performance evaluation as an efficient personnel developmen...Presentation: Job performance evaluation as an efficient personnel developmen...
Presentation: Job performance evaluation as an efficient personnel developmen...
 
Manufacturing Efficiency and Performance Calculation
Manufacturing Efficiency and Performance CalculationManufacturing Efficiency and Performance Calculation
Manufacturing Efficiency and Performance Calculation
 
Presentation Advertising and_information_12_07_12
Presentation Advertising and_information_12_07_12Presentation Advertising and_information_12_07_12
Presentation Advertising and_information_12_07_12
 
LA EMOCIÓN EN IMAGENES
LA EMOCIÓN EN IMAGENESLA EMOCIÓN EN IMAGENES
LA EMOCIÓN EN IMAGENES
 
Bizzxe Intelligence - Business Analyser
Bizzxe Intelligence - Business AnalyserBizzxe Intelligence - Business Analyser
Bizzxe Intelligence - Business Analyser
 
Industrial Design Portfolio
Industrial Design PortfolioIndustrial Design Portfolio
Industrial Design Portfolio
 
Business process reengineering
Business process reengineeringBusiness process reengineering
Business process reengineering
 
QA Workflow
QA WorkflowQA Workflow
QA Workflow
 
In normanni u l-konti ruġġieru ppt.
In normanni u l-konti ruġġieru ppt.In normanni u l-konti ruġġieru ppt.
In normanni u l-konti ruġġieru ppt.
 
Visian icl
Visian iclVisian icl
Visian icl
 
Visian icl
Visian iclVisian icl
Visian icl
 
INTACS ÖRNEK ÇALIŞMA
INTACS ÖRNEK ÇALIŞMAINTACS ÖRNEK ÇALIŞMA
INTACS ÖRNEK ÇALIŞMA
 
Highlights experts meeting_vienna_2011_crst_esup_feb2012[1]
Highlights experts meeting_vienna_2011_crst_esup_feb2012[1]Highlights experts meeting_vienna_2011_crst_esup_feb2012[1]
Highlights experts meeting_vienna_2011_crst_esup_feb2012[1]
 
ICL, Toric ICL Symposium
ICL, Toric ICL Symposium ICL, Toric ICL Symposium
ICL, Toric ICL Symposium
 

Similar a Review Framework

Amazon Fresh - Mock Financials
Amazon Fresh - Mock FinancialsAmazon Fresh - Mock Financials
Amazon Fresh - Mock Financials
Helena Lavieri
 
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
PMI_IREP_TP
 

Similar a Review Framework (20)

Project initiation
Project initiationProject initiation
Project initiation
 
Changes in branch score card
Changes in branch score cardChanges in branch score card
Changes in branch score card
 
Service lifecycle placemat v3
Service lifecycle placemat v3Service lifecycle placemat v3
Service lifecycle placemat v3
 
2013 Totango Annual SaaS Metrics Survey
2013 Totango Annual SaaS Metrics Survey2013 Totango Annual SaaS Metrics Survey
2013 Totango Annual SaaS Metrics Survey
 
Sales and Use Tax Process: Benchmarks and Best Practices for Retailers
Sales and Use Tax Process: Benchmarks and Best Practices for RetailersSales and Use Tax Process: Benchmarks and Best Practices for Retailers
Sales and Use Tax Process: Benchmarks and Best Practices for Retailers
 
FDSeminar Controlling Christian Pauwels - Bimac
FDSeminar Controlling  Christian Pauwels - BimacFDSeminar Controlling  Christian Pauwels - Bimac
FDSeminar Controlling Christian Pauwels - Bimac
 
Tucker & Company cx roi simulator
Tucker & Company cx roi simulatorTucker & Company cx roi simulator
Tucker & Company cx roi simulator
 
Compensation Practice
Compensation PracticeCompensation Practice
Compensation Practice
 
Tucker & Company ROI simulator
Tucker & Company ROI simulatorTucker & Company ROI simulator
Tucker & Company ROI simulator
 
Tucker & Company cx roi simulator
Tucker & Company cx roi simulatorTucker & Company cx roi simulator
Tucker & Company cx roi simulator
 
Sales and Use Tax Process - Benchmarks and Best Practices for Manufacturers
Sales and Use Tax Process - Benchmarks and Best Practices for ManufacturersSales and Use Tax Process - Benchmarks and Best Practices for Manufacturers
Sales and Use Tax Process - Benchmarks and Best Practices for Manufacturers
 
Benchmark and Optimize Warranty Management by Mize
Benchmark and Optimize Warranty Management by MizeBenchmark and Optimize Warranty Management by Mize
Benchmark and Optimize Warranty Management by Mize
 
Balanced Scorecard PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Balanced Scorecard PowerPoint Presentation Slides Balanced Scorecard PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Balanced Scorecard PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
Value Stream Mapping Project Template by Operational Excellence Consulting
Value Stream Mapping Project Template by Operational Excellence ConsultingValue Stream Mapping Project Template by Operational Excellence Consulting
Value Stream Mapping Project Template by Operational Excellence Consulting
 
Mountainview ITSM: ITIL Edition 2007 Process Poster
Mountainview ITSM: ITIL Edition 2007 Process PosterMountainview ITSM: ITIL Edition 2007 Process Poster
Mountainview ITSM: ITIL Edition 2007 Process Poster
 
How to design RPA performance metrics
How to design RPA performance metricsHow to design RPA performance metrics
How to design RPA performance metrics
 
Measuring the Performance of Your Subscription Business: The Three Metrics Th...
Measuring the Performance of Your Subscription Business: The Three Metrics Th...Measuring the Performance of Your Subscription Business: The Three Metrics Th...
Measuring the Performance of Your Subscription Business: The Three Metrics Th...
 
Sap Approach
Sap ApproachSap Approach
Sap Approach
 
Amazon Fresh - Mock Financials
Amazon Fresh - Mock FinancialsAmazon Fresh - Mock Financials
Amazon Fresh - Mock Financials
 
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
 

Más de Kanchana Weerasinghe

Más de Kanchana Weerasinghe (10)

Data Visualization.pptx
Data Visualization.pptxData Visualization.pptx
Data Visualization.pptx
 
Data_Warehouse_Concept.pptx
Data_Warehouse_Concept.pptxData_Warehouse_Concept.pptx
Data_Warehouse_Concept.pptx
 
ERP Scope
ERP ScopeERP Scope
ERP Scope
 
ERP Manufacturing Module
ERP Manufacturing  ModuleERP Manufacturing  Module
ERP Manufacturing Module
 
Business Process Re-Engineering Case Study
Business Process Re-Engineering Case StudyBusiness Process Re-Engineering Case Study
Business Process Re-Engineering Case Study
 
Business Process Reengineering big picture
Business Process Reengineering big picture Business Process Reengineering big picture
Business Process Reengineering big picture
 
Marketing stratigy ver 2
Marketing stratigy ver 2Marketing stratigy ver 2
Marketing stratigy ver 2
 
Data science in business
Data science in businessData science in business
Data science in business
 
Business state evaluation framework
Business state evaluation frameworkBusiness state evaluation framework
Business state evaluation framework
 
Pragmatic Approach to Data Science
Pragmatic Approach to Data SciencePragmatic Approach to Data Science
Pragmatic Approach to Data Science
 

Review Framework

  • 1. Employee Performance Reviewing Framework for Software Development Division
  • 2. Development Manger Division Structure Team Lead Senior Business Analyst Junior Business AnalystJoiner Software QA Engineer
  • 3. Internship Business Analysis Tier Salary Band Bonus % Probation period Non Experienced Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation % Diploma and equivalent Degree and equivalent Experienced 1- 2 Years with Paper Qualification 2- 5 Years with Paper Qualification Employee Tiers Max Annual Total Allocation % =Max Bonus % + Max Incentive %+ Max Annual Increment % + Inflation % Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation % Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation % Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation %
  • 4. Employee Tiers Software QA Non Experienced Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation % Diploma and equivalent Degree and equivalent Experienced 1- 2 Years with Paper Qualification 2- 5 Years with Paper Qualification Max Annual Total Allocation % =Max Bonus % + Max Incentive %+ Max Annual Increment % + Inflation % Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation % Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation % Tier Salary Band Max Bonus % Max Incentive % Max Annual Total Allocation % Internship Tier Salary Band Bonus % Probation period
  • 5. Requirement Gathering • Number of missing requirement (40%) • Number of rework on or due to unclear or wrong requirement (40%) Stakeholder Management • Customer feedback card rating(40%) • Number of meeting which covered the meeting objectives (60%) Change Set Management • Number of proposed changes which was rejected after the in-depth analysis (60%) • Number of iterations (40%) Business Process Analysis and Re-engineering • Number of reengineering which meet the BPR objectives (60%) • Number of broken business process identified correctly (40%) Documentation • Number of standards not followed (30%) • Number of cross domain not covered (20%) • Number of not documented valid requirement (20%) • Number of unclear documentation (30%) • Number of On-scheduled document deliverable Deliverables and KPI – Team Leader Reviewing and ALM update • Submitting of release wise QA review report (20%) • Submitting of scope wise business analysis review report (20%) • Number of missing ALM schedule update (20%) • Number of missing communication plan update (20%) • Number of missing team members weekly review update (20%)
  • 6. Requirement Gathering • Number of missing requirement (40%) • Number of rework on due to unclear or wrong requirement (40%) Stakeholder Management • Customer feedback card rating(40%) • Number of meeting which covered the meeting objectives (60%) Change Set Management • Number of proposed changes which was rejected after the in-depth analysis (60%) • Number of iterations (40%) Business Process Analysis and Re-engineering • Number of reengineering which meet the BPR objectives (60%) • Number of broken business process identified correctly (40%) Documentation • Number of standards not followed (30%) • Number of cross domain not covered (20%) • Number of not documented valid requirement (20%) • Number of unclear documentation (30%) • Number of On-scheduled document deliverable Deliverables and KPI – Business Analyst
  • 7. Th Requirement Understanding Test case Designing • Number of missing business rules in test cases (30%) • Number of missing functional requirement in test cases(30%) • Number of missing integration teat case (20%) • Numbers of missing requirement traceability matrix(20%) Defect Reporting Deliverables and KPI – QA • Number of missing defect (40%) • Number of valid suggestion (20%) • % high/critical defects (20%) • % of Rejected Defects (20%) • Number of missing business rules(40%) • Number of missing functional requirement(40%) • Number of missing non functional requirement(20%)
  • 8. Submitting of scope wise business analysis review report Submitting of release wise QA review report Reviewing and ALM update Requirement Gathering 20% 20% 0 100 Team leader Quarterly Review Business Analyzing Requirement Gathering20% Stakeholder Management20% Number of missing ALM schedule update Number of missing communication plan update Number of missing team members weekly review update 20% 20% 20% Change Set Management10% Business Process Analysis and Re-engineering 30% Documentation20%
  • 9. Number of rework on due to unclear or wrong requirement Number of missing requirement Requirement Gathering Stakeholder Management Requirement Gathering 60% 40% Customer feedback card rating 40% Number of meeting witch covered the meeting objectives 60% Number of standards not followed 30% Number of aspect not covered Number of missing requirement Number of unclear documentation 20% 20% 30% Documentation Business Process Analyst and Re-engineering Change Set Management Number of reengineering which improve the efficiency of current process 60% Number of broken business process identified correctly 40% Number of proposed changes which was rejected after the in-depth analysis 60% Number of iterations 40% 10 % 0 100 Business Analyst Quarterly Review
  • 10. Number of missing functional requirement Number of missing business rules Requirement Understanding Requirement Gathering 40% 40% Number of missing business rules in test cases 30% Number of missing functional requirement in test cases Number of missing integration teat case Numbers of missing requirement traceability matrix 30% 20% 20% Test case Designing Defect Reporting Number of missing defect40% Number of valid suggestion20% 0 100 QA Quarterly Review Number of missing non functional requirement 20% Percentage of high/critical defects20% Percentage of rejected Defects20%
  • 11. 0 100 0 - 80 80 - 90 90 - 100 Quarterly Review Bonus % Incentive % Bonus % Incentive % Bonus % Incentive %
  • 12. 0 100 0 - 80 80 - 90 90 - 100 Annual Review Basic Salary Increment % Promotion 0 Inflation % Review outcome % Management Decision % Basic Salary Increment % 0 Promotion 0 Basic Salary Increment % 0 Promotion 0 0% 0% 0% 1st quarter review 2nd quarter review 3rd quarter review 4th quarter review
  • 13. How Does It Work 1- 2 Years with paper qualification Employee Name Jone Values Tier T1 Position Business Analyst Current Salary 25000 Salary Band 25000 - 31000 Max Annual Total Allocation % 15 3750 Max Incentive % 2 500 Max Bonus % 5 1250 Max Annual Increment based on review framework % 5 1250 Inflation % 3 750 Max Annual Total Allocation % =Max Bonus % + Max Incentive %+ Max Annual Increment based on review framework % + Inflation % Note: This percentage should be decided by the finance department after reviewing the financial stability of the department First Review Result Contribution % Requirement Gathering 70 30 21 Stakeholder Management 80 10 8 Change Set Management 70 10 7 Business Process Analysis and Re- engineering 80 20 18 Documentation 90 30 27 81
  • 14. Quarterly Review Scale Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100 Bonus % 0 60 % 100% Incentive % 0% 60% 100% 81 Description Bonus 60 % (1250/4)*0.6 =187.50 Incentive 60 % (500/4)*0.6 =75 Quarterly Review Outcome 262.50 $ 1st quarter review Quarterly Review Scale Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100 Bonus % 0 60 % 100% Incentive % 0% 60% 100% 75 Description Bonus 0% 0 Incentive 0 % 0 Quarterly Review Outcome 0 $ 2st quarter review Quarterly Review Scale Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100 Bonus % 0 60 % 100% Incentive % 0% 60% 100% 85 Description Bonus 60 % (1250/4)*0.6 =187.50 Incentive 60 % (500/4)*0.6 =75 Quarterly Review Outcome 262.50 $ 3st quarter review Quarterly Review Scale Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100 Bonus % 0 60 % 100% Incentive % 0% 60% 100% 95 Description Bonus 100 % (1250/4)*1 =312.50 Incentive 1000 % (500/4)*1 =125 Quarterly Review Outcome 437.50$ 4st quarter review
  • 15. 81 1st quarter review 75 2st quarter review 85 3st quarter review 95 4st quarter review 25% 25% 25% 25% 20.25 18.75 21.25 23.75 84 Annual Review Outcome Annual Review Scale Description 0-80 80-90 90 -100 Basic Salary Increment 0 60 % 100% Promotion (1250)*0.6 =750 750 $