6. The advice I got
•Good: Pick a stable, well-funded lab where people graduate on time
•Good: Diversify project risk
•Bad: Keep your head down, work hard, and it’ll all work out
15. ...helps
researchers work smarter
...makes science more collaborative and transparent
…has created an open research database
Tools of scientific discovery
Mendeley..
16. Achievements
•OA policy advocacy successes
•A tool that doesn’t suck
•Altmetrics (Draft NISO standard)
•Reproducibility ($1.3M funding and partnership with Center for Open Science)
17. 1.Seek advice from the people who can give it
2.Know Thyself
3.Look Beyond the Surface
Lessons
18.
19. Stay
•What do you want to do?
•Will you find "Flow"?
•Realistic impression?
•Supportive network?
•Are you young?
20. Go
•Frustrated by lack of impact?
•Like to write?
•Want to influence policy?
•Are you too charismatic?
34. How our eyes and brain perceive
It takes 200 ms to initiate an eye movement, but the red dot can be found in 100 ms or less. This is due to pre-attentive processing.
46. Types of color schemes
•Sequential – suited for ordered data that progress from low to high. Use light colors for low values and dark colors for higher.
•Diverging – uses hue to show the breakpoint and intensity to show divergent extremes.
•Qualitative – uses different colors to represent different categories. Beware of using hue/saturation to highlight unimportant categories.
50. Tips for maps
•Keep it to 5-7 data classes
•~8% of men are red-green colorblind
•Diverging schemes don’t do well when printed or photocopied
•Colors will often render differently on different screens, especially low-end LCD screens
•http://colorbrewer2.org
57. Speed (1)
If I find an interesting reference in the literature, people will only know about it after one year, maybe, after I have actually published it. However if I tweet it people will know about it immediately, as soon as possible.
results
- 'Tyrone'
58. Speed (2)
Twitter citations quickly follow article publication:
results
Priem, J. and Costello, K. L. (2010), How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech., 47: 1–4. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701201