PracticeNet 911 Survey
•Descargar como PPT, PDF•
1 recomendación•311 vistas
![[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/practicenet-911-survey-3946/85/PracticeNet-911-Survey-1-320.jpg)
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Destacado
Similar a PracticeNet 911 Survey
Similar a PracticeNet 911 Survey (20)
Último
Último (20)
PracticeNet 911 Survey
- 2. Suggested Citation American Psychological Association Practice Directorate (2002). The Impact of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks on Practitioners and Their Clients. Unpublished results of the PracticeNet 9/11 survey, October 8-15, 2001, Washington, DC.
- 3. Acknowledgements PracticeNet's initial development has been underwritten by the federal Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) as part of the agency’s effort to learn more about the ways in which psychologists are encountering and treating problems related to substance use.
- 15. Results During the specified clinical encounter, proportion of time spent discussing the terrorist attacks of 9/11, subsequent related events (actual or feared), traumatic or anxiety reactions to associated stimuli, and/or memories of prior traumatic events triggered by the attacks and their aftermath:
- 16. Results Implications of the Events of 9/11 Discussed in Terms of Client’s Identity, Priority, World View and Spiritual Outlook
- 18. Results Client Symptoms that First Appeared or Worsened since September 11
Notas del editor
- Using PracticeNet TM , a unique internet-based data collection infrastructure, the APA Practice Directorate conducted a survey of practicing psychologists regarding the effects of the terrorist attacks of September 11. The survey was conducted October 8 - 11, one month after the attacks. This presentation describes the results of that survey. When viewing these data, it is important to remember that this is a volunteer sample, so participating psychologists were not randomly selected. While we believe that the experiences of participating practitioners are extremely important and informative, these findings cannot be generalized to all APA members or to all psychologists.