This is a Powerpoint about research into the codes and conventions of a film ...
Weighted Social Tagging Reveals Deeper Insights in EER Literature
1. Weighted Social Tagging as a Research
Methodology to Determine Systemic Trends in
Engineering Education Research
Xin Chen, Nikitha Sambamurthy, Corey Schimpf,
Hanjun Xian, Krishna Madhavan
{chen654, snikitha, cschimpf, hxian, cm}@purdue.edu
26. Motivation
Problem Solving Spectrum
“19th century culture was defined by the novel,
20th century culture by cinema, the culture of the
21st century will be defined by the interface. ”
-- Quoted by Aaron Koblin in the TED
talk: Artfully Visualizing Our Humanity
44. Methodology
3 ENE graduate
students
152 papers
JEE 2005-2009
3,456 tags each with a weight
and a confidence rating
Trends &
core content
Characteristics
of the taggers
Information
Retrieval
47. Data Analysis and Results
3 Hypotheses
Compared with word frequency counting, weighted social
tagging method could get:
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
48. Data Analysis and Results
3 Hypotheses
Compared with word frequency counting, weighted social
tagging method could get:
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
49. Data Analysis and Results
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
Composite Scores from Tagger A
20
High correlation, Narrow coverage
15
10
5
0
5
10
15
Composite Scores from Tagger B
20
50. Data Analysis and Results
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
Composite Scores from Tagger A
20
Low correlation, Wide coverage
15
10
5
0
5
10
15
Composite Scores from Tagger B
20
51. Data Analysis and Results
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
-0.2254
-0.0542
0.0581
-0.2105
weight
confidence
-0.1737
-0.0489
-0.0969
-0.0378
composite
-0.2226
52. Data Analysis and Results
3 Hypotheses
Compared with word frequency counting, weighted social
tagging method could get:
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
53. Data Analysis and Results
3 Hypotheses
Compared with word frequency counting, weighted social
tagging method could get:
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
54. Data Analysis and Results
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
Pomales-Garcia & Liu (2007)
55. Data Analysis and Results
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
Word Frequency Counting
Top 15
keywords
Weighted Social Tagging
students
engineering
education
participants
skills
teaching
questions
student
professors
study
excellence
technology
classroom
more
used
interviews
sex parity
student view
student involvement
excellence
ethnographic perspective
perception discrepancies
consensus
institutions
undergraduate
participant activities
qualitative research
technology usage
variables
discursive
56. Data Analysis and Results
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
Word Frequency Counting
Top 15
keywords
Weighted Social Tagging
students
engineering
education
participants
skills
teaching
questions
student
professors
study
excellence
excellence
technology
classroom
more
used
interviews
sex parity
student view
student involvement
excellence
excellence
ethnographic perspective
perception discrepancies
consensus
institutions
undergraduate
participant activities
qualitative research
technology usage
variables
discursive
57. Data Analysis and Results
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
Word Frequency Counting
Top 15
keywords
Weighted Social Tagging
students
engineering
education
participants
skills
teaching
questions
student
professors
study
excellence
technology
technology
classroom
more
used
interviews
sex parity
student view
student involvement
excellence
ethnographic perspective
perception discrepancies
consensus
institutions
undergraduate
participant activities
qualitative research
technology usage
technology usage
variables
discursive
58. Data Analysis and Results
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
Word Frequency Counting
Top 15
keywords
Weighted Social Tagging
students
engineering
education
participants
participants
skills
teaching
questions
student
professors
study
excellence
technology
classroom
more
used
interviews
sex parity
student view
student involvement
excellence
ethnographic perspective
perception discrepancies
consensus
institutions
undergraduate
participant activities
participants activities
qualitative research
technology usage
variables
discursive
59. Data Analysis and Results
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
Word Frequency Counting
Top 15
keywords
Weighted Social Tagging
students
engineering
education
participants
skills
teaching
questions
student
professors
study
excellence
technology
classroom
more
used
interviews
interviews
sex parity
sex parity
student
student view
view
student involvement
student involvement
excellence
ethnographic perspective
ethnographic perspective
perception discrepancies
consensus
institutions
undergraduate
participant activities
qualitative research
technology usage
variables
discursive
60. Data Analysis and Results
3 Hypotheses
Compared with word frequency counting, weighted social
tagging method could get:
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
61. Data Analysis and Results
3 Hypotheses
Compared with word frequency counting, weighted social
tagging method could get:
H1
Wide coverage of meaning space with minimized bias.
H2
Better description of content of individual papers.
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
62. Data Analysis and Results
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
Top 20 Keywords 2005-2009
Word Frequency Counting
Weighted Social Tagging
63. Data Analysis and Results
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
Top 20 Keywords 2005-2009
Word Frequency Counting
Weighted Social Tagging
66. Data Analysis and Results
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
Top 20 Keywords 2005-2009
Word Frequency Counting
Weighted Social Tagging
67. Data Analysis and Results
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
Top 20 Keywords 2005-2009
Word Frequency Counting
Weighted Social Tagging
68. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
69. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
70. 2005
assessment
assessment
2006
2007
2008
2009
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
71. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
2005
2006
assessment
2007
2008
2009
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
72. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
73. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
74. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
2005
2006
women
2007
2008
2009
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
75. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
76. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
77. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
2005
2006
retention
2007
2008
2009
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
78. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
79. 2005
2006
2007
2008
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
2009
survey
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
80. 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
assessment
simulation
concept
how people learn
survey
engagement
retention
knowledge
concept
discipline
laboratory
ethics
teamwork
active learning
teamwork
skill
survey
ethnography
design
women
experiment
model
expert
qualitative
self-efficacy
problem-based learning
interactive
model
methodology
gender
historical
knowledge
essay
meta-analysis
engineering education
collaboration
class design
First Year Engineering
pedagogy
faculty
concept
entrepreneurship
satisfaction
development
concept
women
assessment
retention
survey
behavioral complexity
skills
innovation
cross-disciplinary
research
career
creative
experiment
comparative
cross-disciplinary
interview
self-directed learning
active learning
discourse
assessment
k-12
methodology
online
engineering culture
engineering culture
retention
accessibility
institution
diversity
feedback
collaboration
descriptive
interaction
individual
future scenarios
recruitment
intention
comparative
semi-structured interview
learning factory
comparative
bias
industry
women
retention
descriptive study
organization
t-test
efficiency
mechanism
institutional difference
curriculum
attrition
observation
2005
2006
survey
2007
2008
2009
cognitive psychology cross-profession training
81. Data Analysis and Results
H3
Be#er
characteriza,on
of
trends
in
the
body
of
literature.
Composite Score
120
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
85
50
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Top 20 Tags
Top ranking tags become less dominant indicates topics are expanding.
87. Future Work
1
Increase number and diversity of taggers
2
Ease tagging process
3
Further analyze trends from different angles
EER community
88. Future Work
1
Increase number and diversity of taggers
2
Ease tagging process
3
Further analyze trends from different angles
4
Analyze characteristics of taggers
EER community
89. Future Work
1
Increase number and diversity of taggers
2
Ease tagging process
3
Further analyze trends from different angles
4
Analyze characteristics of taggers
5
Build an interactive interface
EER community