3GPP Overview
TSG Plenary Status
RAN workshop on 5G
SA1 5G SMARTER
Radio Interface Technology definition
Time Delay analysis
Four New Building Block Study Items for 5G
Enhanced Mobile Broadband
Massive Internet of Things
Critical Machine Communications (ultra-reliable and low latency)
Network operation (including Migration and Interworking)
Capabilities of Future IMT systems
Conclusions
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
LTE Release 13 and SMARTER – Road Towards 5G
1. LTE Release 13 and SMARTER –
Road Towards 5G
Yi-Hsueh Tsai
Institute for Information Industry
1
2. Outline
• 3GPP Overview
• TSG Plenary Status
• RAN workshop on 5G
• SA1 5G SMARTER
– Radio Interface Technology definition
– Time Delay analysis
– Four New Building Block Study Items for 5G
• Enhanced Mobile Broadband
• Massive Internet of Things
• Critical Machine Communications (ultra-reliable and low latency)
• Network operation (including Migration and Interworking)
– Capabilities of Future IMT systems
• Conclusions
2
3. The role of 3GPP
• GSM, GPRS, W-CDMA, UMTS, EDGE, HSPA and LTE are all RAN Technologies
specified by 3GPP
• Core network and Systems architecture evolution have kept pace
• Backward compatibility is a key element of each new 3GPP Release
3
3
The 3GPP Organizational Partners are
Regional and National Standards Bodies;
Companies participate through their
membership of one of these 6 Partners
Source: 3GPP
4. 3GPP Structure
• 4 Technical Specification Groups (TSG) which control their Working Groups (WGs)
• TSGs meet 4 times/year, WGs in 1 or 2 times (for 1 week) between TSGs
• WGs have up to 350 participants & handle up to 1300 Technical Documents per week
• results are TSG approved Change Requests (CR) to modify Technical Specifications
4Source: 3GPP
Project Co-ordination Group (PCG)
TSG GERAN
GSM EDGE
Radio Access Network
TSG RAN
Radio Access Network
TSG SA
Service & Systems Aspects
TSG CT
Core Network & Terminals
GERAN WG1
Radio Aspects
RAN WG1
Radio Layer 1 spec
SA WG1
Services
CT WG1
MM/CC/SM (lu)
GERAN WG2
Protocol Aspects
RAN WG2
Radio Layer 2 spec
Radio Layer 3 RR spec
SA WG2
Architecture
CT WG3
Interworking with external
networks
GERAN WG3
Terminal Testing
RAN WG3
lub spec, lur spec, lu spec
UTRAN O&M requirements
SA WG3
Security
CT WG4
MAP/GTP/BCH/SS
RAN WG4
Radio Performance Protocol aspects
SA WG4
Codec
CT WG6
Smart Card Application Aspect
RAN WG5
Mobile Terminal Conformance Testing
SA WG5
Telecom Management
SA WG6
Mission-critical applications
5. Scope of 3GPP TSG
5
Source: NEC
eNB
SGW
E-UTRAN
PDG
MME
6. Relationship between 3GPP and other SDOs
6
Source: 3GPP
Developing internet
protocol specs
ITU-R/T
Developing Mobile
application specs
Organisational Partners
Referringto3GPPspecs
(contributedbyindividualmembers)
Partners of 3GPP
Referring to 3GPP specs for
the local specs
Referring to specs
Cross reference
of specs
Developing Wireless
LAN/MAN specs
Requirements
JapanEU Korea China North America
MRP
Developing
Recommendations
Terminal
Certification
India
7. Analog
Digital
1980’
s
1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s
Release 99
(1999)
W-CDMA
LTE enhancementsITU-R M.1457
IMT-2000 Recommendation
ITU-R
IMT 2020
5G (Phase 2)
Release 16
Release 9
(2009)
Release 4
(2001)
LCR TDD Release 8
(2007)
LTE LTE-Advanced
Release 14
Pre 5G
Release 5
(2002)
HSDPA HSPA+ (MIMO, etc.)
Further LTE
enhancements
Release 11
(2011)
LTE-A
Release 13
Release 7
(2006)
Release 6
(2004)
HSUPA, MBMS ITU-R M.2012 [IMT.RSPEC]
IMT-Advanced Recommendation
LTE-A Release 12
(2012)
Release 10
(2010)
Data/PS
3GPP R99
1G (AMPS)
2G (GSM)
3G (384K)
3.9G (300M)
4G (1Gps)
5G (10Gps,
expect)
3.5G (42M)
LTE, R8
LTE-A, R10
RIT, R15/R16
HSPA, R5
Voice/SMS Service
App/SNS Service
Cloud/Big Data Service 100X 4G provide VRI Service + IoT
Wearable Device Service
Evolution from 1G to 5G
5G (Phase 1)
Release 15
8. TSG Plenary Status
TSG Topic SA RAN
3GPP Project Name
Study
Item
Work
Item
Study
Item
Work
Item
Indoor Positioning Enhancement / ELIOT #67 #64
Licensed-Assisted Access using LTE #65 #68
Single-Cell Point To Multipoint (SC-PTM) transmission #66 #68
LTE support for V2X service / LTE-based V2X Services #67 #69 #68
Extended Proximity-based Services/Enhanced LTE D2D Proximity Services #64 #66
LTE CA Enhancement Beyond 5 Carriers #66
LTE enhancements for Machine-Type Communications #65
Elevation Beamforming / Full-Dimension MIMO #65
Enhanced Multiuser Transmissions and Network Assisted Interference Cancellation #66
OAM support for Licensed Shared Access #67
New Services and Markets Technology Enablers #67
8
9. Indoor Positioning Enhancement
• The Indoor Positioning study will first determine the performance of already specified
positioning methods in indoor environments and later evaluate potential improvements to
the existing methods, or new methods, in order to achieve improved positioning accuracy.
• While initially driven by the FCC request to improve the positioning accuracy in indoor
environments for emergency calls, the work can further expand the capability of the LTE
platform - allowing operators to address the growing market of indoor positioning.
9
Source: RP-140967 & RP-141003 (NextNav)Building
Mary’s UE
10. ELIOT
Enhancing Location Capabilities for Indoor and Outdoor Emergency Communications
The topics covered includes, but not limited to developing or enhancing existing emergency
location service requirements arising from the Roadmap and the Fourth Report and Order:
1. Reporting vertical location requirements for emergency calls which may be based on
measurements of physical and environmental conditions (e.g. compensated barometric
pressure) or other positioning technologies
2. Supporting and delivering a dispatchable address (civic address with detail to
floor/room/suite number) of a mobile caller's location to the PSAP for emergency calls
3. Defining emergency location performance metrics including those based on physical
and environmental properties
4. Support technology alternatives demonstrating indoor location accuracy improvements
(e.g. A-GPS, TBS, multi-lateration)
10
Source: SP-150044 & S1-150065 (Sprint)
11. Licensed-Assisted Access using LTE (1/2)
The goal is to study enhancements for LTE to operate in unlicensed spectrum.
While licensed spectrum remains operators’ top priority to deliver advanced
services and user experience, the opportunistic use of unlicensed spectrum is
becoming an important complement to meet the growing traffic demand.
11
Licensed band Unlicensed band
Primary
Carrier
DL only
Secondary
Carrier(s)
Licensed band Unlicensed band
Primary
Carrier
DL and UL on
Secondary
Carrier(s)
Source: RP-141615 & RP-141664 (Ericsson & Huawei)
12. Licensed-Assisted Access using LTE (2/2)
• An essential component of the study is to ensure coexistence between
LTE with WiFi and to provide a fair opportunity in accessing the
unlicensed spectrum.
• In terms of deployment scenarios, the focus will be on Licensed-Assisted
Aggregation (LAA) operation to aggregate a primary cell - using
licensed spectrum - to deliver critical information and guaranteed
Quality of Service, and a secondary cell - using unlicensed spectrum -
to opportunistically boost data rate.
• The secondary cell operating in unlicensed spectrum could be configured
either as downlink-only cell or contain both uplink and downlink.
12
Source: RP-141615 & RP-141664 (Ericsson & Huawei)
13. Single-Cell Point-to-Multipoint (SC-PTM)
• For critical communications, radio efficiency should be seriously
considered, whether critical communications are deployed in
dedicated network or in shared network.
• Problems for critical communications over eMBMS could be solved
by the so called Single-cell Point To Multipoint (SC-PTM)
transmission, where:
– Multicast is performed over PDSCH on a per cell basis.
– Common Group-RNTI is assigned to
a group of users to schedule the traffic
via shared radio resources.
– UE performs the SC-PTM reception either
in idle mode or in connected mode.
13
Source: RP-141919 & RP-141920 (Huawei)
14. LTE support for V2X service
• The vehicular communication in this study, referred to as Vehicle-to-
Everything (V2X), contains the following three different types:
– Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) Communications
– Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) Communications
– Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communications
• Introduction of V2X applications (use cases)
– V2V use cases
• e.g. Forward car collision warning, …
– V2I use case
• e.g. advanced navigation/telematics, cloud services, …
– V2P use case
• e.g. Pedestrian protection (threat alert) from car collision, …
14
V2V
V2P V2I*
V2I RSU
(Road Side Unit
for DSRC)
Cellular network,
Internet, application
servers and so on
Pedestrian
(UE, mobile device)
Vehicle
VehicleSource: SP 150165 & S1-150284 (LG)
15. LTE-based V2X Services
• V2V and V2I provide delivery of V2X messages such as CAM/DENM between vehicles via direct interface
and RSU respectively.
– Note that vehicle-to-vehicle message delivery is realized not only by V2V but also by V2I.
15
Figure 1: Example of V2V
and V2I2V use cases
(Forward Collision Warning)
• V2P provide delivery of V2X messages between vehicles and a device carried by an individual.
• Note that V2P can cover not only a pedestrian but also a driver and a passenger in the SA1 stud.
Figure 2: Example of V2P
use case (Pedestrian
Collision Warning)
Source: RP-151109 & RP-150777 (LG)
16. Extended ProSe/Enhanced LTE D2D ProSe (1/2)
Continue work on items remaining from the Rel-12 SID
– Unicast & groupcast enhancements
– NW to UE relay, UE to UE relay
– Service continuity, QoS,
– Power efficiency, High data rate enhancements
– Support for ProSe related MCPTT requirements
16
Groupcast
Unicast
NW to UE Relay
UE to UE Relay
Source: SP-140353 & RP-141902 & RP-141905 (Qualcomm)
17. Extended ProSe/Enhanced LTE D2D ProSe (2/2)
Enhancements to discovery, multi-carrier, inter-PLMN support
• Direct discovery:
– Support for Type 1 discovery out of coverage/partial coverage
– Model B – request/response discovery
• From SA2: support for model B ProSe Direct Discovery for all use cases (i.e.
open and restricted);
• Multiple carrier and PLMN support
– D2D transmissions in non-serving carrier and/or secondary cell for both
communication and discovery
• Otherwise D2D devices may become concentrated on a single carrier
17
Carrier 1
Carrier 2
WAN
D2D
Source: SP-140353 & RP-141902 & RP-141905 (Qualcomm)
– Further optimize inter-PLMN and
inter-frequency discovery
• UEs learn about inter-frequency/PLMN
resource pools from serving cell
18. LTE CA Enhancement Beyond 5 Carriers
• Specify mechanisms to enable the LTE carrier aggregation of up to
32 carriers:
‒ Focus on extending the currently available CA framework
‒ Enhancements to UL control signalling (including how to efficiently
accommodate more than 5 CCs)
‒ Enhancements to DL control signalling
‒ Enhancements to the higher layer CA framework enabling more than 5 CCs
• Specify support of PUCCH on SCell for UEs supporting uplink
Carrier Aggregation
18
Source: RP-142286 & RP-142012 (Nokia& NTT DoCoMo)
19. LTE enhancements for Machine-Type Communications
The key objective of the work is to define a new low complexity UE
category type that supports reduced bandwidth, reduced transmit
power, reduced support for downlink transmission modes, ultra-long
battery life via power consumption reduction techniques and extended
coverage operation.
• Reduced bandwidth: to specify 1.4 MHz operation at the terminal
within any LTE system bandwidth, allowing operators to multiplex
reduced bandwidth MTC devices and regular devices in their existing
LTE deployments.
• Extended coverage: to improve by 15dB the coverage of delay-tolerant
MTC devices, allowing operators to reach MTC devices in poor
coverage conditions e.g. meters located in basements.
19
Source: RP-141645 (Ericsson)
20. Elevation Beamforming / Full-Dimension MIMO
• To enable elevation beamforming and high-order MIMO
systems. Beamforming and MIMO have been identified as key
technologies to address the future capacity demand.
• To study two-dimensional antenna arrays that can also
exploit the vertical dimension.
• The new study will look into high-order MIMO systems with
up to 64 antenna ports at the eNB, to become more relevant
with the use of higher frequencies in the future.
20
Source: RP-141120 & RP-141644 (Nokia & Samsung)
21. Enhanced Multiuser Transmissions and Network Assisted Interference Cancellation
Potential enhancements for downlink multiuser transmission using superposition coding:
• Identify and study possible enhancements of downlink multiuser transmission schemes
within one cell
• Investigate the potential gain of schemes enabling the simultaneous transmission of more
than one layer of data for more than one UE without time, frequency and spatial
separation (i.e. in the same beam over the same REs) over the existing Rel-12 techniques.
• Identify required standard changes needed to assist UE intra-cell interference
cancellation or suppression for the objectives listed above
21Source: RP-141895 & RP-141896 (MediaTek & Alcatel-Lucent)
• Considering realistic deployment scenarios, traffic model
and trade-offs between system-level gain, UE complexity,
signalling overhead as well as specification impact. The
study will consider UE and eNB feasibility for the possible
enhanced schemes, with realistic UE and eNB impairments,
channel estimation errors.
22. OAM support for Licensed Shared Access
• Identify how the solution and architecture as
defined in ETSI TS 103 235 based on the
requirements in ETSI TS 103 154 may provide a
global solution also supported by the 3GPP
Network Management architecture defined in 3GPP
TS 32.101.
• Analyse the LSA functionalities and the
information flow defined in ETSI RSS, TS 103 235,
and study the impacts on Itf-N.
• Analyse how to support static and semi-static
spectrum sharing scenarios and reference use case
as defined by ETSI RRS as described in sect. 3.4
22
Source: SP-150056 (Nokia)
23. Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers
The study aims
‒ to identify the market segments and verticals whose needs 3GPP should focus on meeting,
‒ to develop the use cases and requirements that the 3GPP eco-system would need to support in the future.
The focus of this work is on the use cases and requirements that cannot be met with EPS.
The work is likely to span a number of 3GPP releases.
The use cases and high-level requirements
can be sourced from existing work such as
4G Americas’ Recommendations on 5G Requirements and Solutions
Chinese IMT-2020 (5G) Promotion Association 5G white paper
ITU-R WP5Ds IMT Vision – Framework
The 5G Forum of Korea’s 5G White Paper
The NGMN 5G White Paper
The future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond
Develop several use cases covering various scenarios and identify the related high-
level potential requirements
Identify and group together use cases with common characteristics
Select a few use cases (or groups of use cases with common characteristics) for further
development
Start new individual building block study items for each use case or group of use
cases identified in the previous step to further develop the use cases and their
potential requirements, and capture desired system requirements and capabilities
that apply across the different verticals. This is essentially a horizontal view of the
potential requirements to complement the vertical use cases.
On completion of study items in the previous step , review and consolidate the
resulting potential requirements from all of them
Target for Phase 1: Sep. 2015
Target for Phase 1: Mar. 2016
Source: S1-150300 (Vodafone)
25. RAN workshop on 5G
Source: RWS150073 RAN workshop on 5G
(Dino Flore, Chairman of 3GPP RAN)
25
26. Use Cases & Services
• Three emerging high level use cases for Next Generation
Radio Technology (also from IMT 2020 discussion):
1. Enhanced Mobile Broadband
2. Massive Machine Type Communications
3. Ultra-reliable and Low Latency Communications
• Wide agreement that the Next Generation Radio Technology
should be able to support a variety of new services
– Automotive, Health, Energy, Manufacturing …
– Some of these new services are being described by SA1 in the
SMARTER project
26
RWS150073 (RAN Chair)
27. New radio
• Emerging consensus that there will be a new, non-
backward compatible, radio as part of Next
Generation Radio Technology
– Strong LTE evolution continued in parallel
• The requirements and scope of the new radio will be
established by RAN in the SI starting in December
– WGs will then proceed with the evaluation of technology
solutions in the SI starting in March
27
RWS150073 (RAN Chair)
28. 5G Time Line for 3GPP
IMT-2020 specifications
Evaluation
5D#23
Feb 16
5D#26
Feb 17
5D#27
Jun 17
Requirements
Evaluation criteria
Initial submissions of proposals
5D#28
Oct 17
5D#32
Jun 19
5D#31
Oct 18
5D#34
Feb 20
5D#36
Oct 20
RAN#70
Dec 15
channel modeling
RAN#69
Sep 15
RAN#72
Jun 16
RAN#86
Jun 20
RAN SI: scope & requirements
HSPA/LTE evolution
IMT2020
RAN WG SI: evaluation of solutions RAN WG WI: specification of solutions
Final3GPP
submission
Initial3GPPsubmission
IMT2020
requirements
RAN#71
Mar 16
Rel-13 freeze
RAN Workshop 3GPPrequirements
28
Source : 3GPP SP-150149
29. Phasing
• Emerging consensus that there should be two phases for the
normative work
– Phase 1 to be completed by H2 2018 to address a more urgent subset of
the commercial needs (to be agreed)
– Phase 2 to be completed by Dec 2019 for the IMT 2020 submission and
to address all identified use cases & requirements
• The above implies the following, tentative, release timing
29
RWS150073 (RAN Chair)
30. Interworking & System Architecture
• There seems to be a need to also rethink the System
Architecture for “5G”
– This will be debated under the new SI to be approved by SA
• The level of interworking of the new radio with the
legacy systems needs to be discussed more in detail –
different opinion & nuances seems to exist
– This discussion will be done in cooperation with SA group
(for this it may be also useful the joint workshop tentatively
planned for H2-16)
30
RWS150073 (RAN Chair)
32. “SMARTER” Introduction
• Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers,
3GPP SA1 Study Item for Rel-14
• Objective to develop high-level use cases and identify the
related high-level potential requirements for 5G
• TR22.891 completion Sept 2015 Dec 2015. Start subsequent
TRs Nov 2015, completion March 2016
32
Define use cases
Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016
Define use casesDefine use casesFurther develop 3-4
(groups of) use cases
Selection and grouping
Normative work
(Rel-15)
Further develop
other use cases
Consolidate
requirements
SA1ad-hoc
RWS150032 (SA1 Chair)
33. Radio Interface Technology (RIT) definition
• The current definition of RAT in 21.905 is
– Radio Access Technology: Type of technology used for radio access, for instance
E-UTRA, UTRA, GSM, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO (HRPD) or CDMA2000 1x
(1xRTT).
• In order to accommodate a wide range of use cases as described by the
NGMN white paper, 5G air interface technologies will allow for more
flexible operation and support a variety of communication purposes
– Radio Interface Technology (RIT): Type of technology used for radio
communication between two or more devices, without limitation to the functional
capability or the purpose of the communication. A RIT may be used to provide a
traditional access function, a backhaul function, a direct device-to-device (D2D)
function between peers, or multiple such functions. A RIT may also support a
variety of different communication modes (e.g., unicast, multicast, broadcast)
and/or topologies (e.g., point-to-point, star, tree, or mesh). 33
S1-152276 (Qualcomm)
34. Time Delay Scenarios and Analysis
There are several cases for the E2E delay definition in the local communication
scenario (e.g. with ultra-low latency requirement) as shown in Figure x1. Note
that the numbers in the figure indicate the component links of a communication
path, for example, 1 refers to the link from a UE to an eNB.
UE
eNB
UE
EPC
1
7
2
8
6
5
APP
Server
3 4
APP APP
34
S1-152728 (Huawei, Vodafone)
a) via 1, 8 (in red): RTT (round-
trip-time) for Uu interface
b) via 1, 6,7,8 (in blue): E2E
communication. Normally it
doubles the time delay in case a).
c) via 1,2, 3, 4,5,8 (in yellow):
from UE to the APP Server
35. Time Delay Scenarios and Analysis
There are several cases for the E2E delay definition in the remote scenario
(e.g. with low latency requirement) as shown in Figure x2 below:
UE
eNB
UE
EPC1
1
10
2
14
9
13
APP
Server
3’ 4’
eNB
EPC2
11 8
APP
Server
6 7
APP
APP
5
12
35
S1-152728 (Huawei, Vodafone)
a) via 1,2,5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14
(in blue): E2E
communication via different
EPCs in remote cities.
b) via ) 1,2, 3’, 4’,13,14 (in
yellow): from UE to APP
Server (Client-Server). In
this case but the APP Server
is far away from EPC1.
The E2E time delay will be longer if we consider the process delay in each nodes.
36. Physical Limit for E2E Time Delay
The propagation delay is limited by physics,
i.e. the speed of light (299 792 458 meters per
second) in air and 2/3 of the speed of light in
fibre connection. With these limits, 1ms one
way transmission latency can be mapped to
300 km air propagation or 200 km for fiber
based transmission as shown in left Figure.
36
A.3 Conclusions
1. Local Communication:
E2E time delay can not be less than 1ms.
2. Remote Communication:
E2E time delay can not be less than 10ms. Source: 3GPP TR 22.891 v.1.0.0
37. Four New Building Block Study Items for 5G
37
S1-153204 Vodafone New study item on New Services and Markets Technology
Enablers for massive Internet of Things – SMARTER-mIoT
S1-153205 Nokia
Networks
New Work Item on Reliable Communications
S1-153198 Huawei,
Hisilicon
New study item on New Services and Markets Technology
Enablers for enhanced Mobile Broadband – SMARTER-eMBB
S1-153203 China
Mobile
Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers –
Network Operation
SA1 propose the following building block study items in the separated documents:
- Enhanced Mobile Broadband
- Massive Internet of Things
- Critical Machine Communications (ultra-reliable and low latency)
- Network operation (including Migration and Interworking)
38. SMARTER use cases vs. eMBB use case families
Dense urban
Rural
coverage
High speed
High density
Urban
coverage
Broadband
access in
dense area
Broadband
access
everywhere
High user
mobility
Indoor
hotspots
NGMN 5G White
Paper v1.0
TR 22.891 V0.2.0, “Feasibility Study on New
Services and Markets Technology Enablers”
UC 5.5: Mobile broadband for indoor scenario
UC 5.6: Mobile broadband for hotspots scenario
UC 5.7: On-demand networking
UC 5.10: Mobile broadband services with seamless
wide-area coverage
UC 5.11: Virtual presence
UC 5.29: Higher user mobility
UC 5.30: Connectivity everywhere
UC 5.32: Improvement of network capabilities for
vehicular case
UC 5.53: Vehicular Internet & infotainment
39. New building block study item: eMBB
Factors that justify a building block study for SMARTER step
3-4*:
Example requirements in various deployment scenarios
Common requirements
- high user experienced data rate
- high traffic density
- mobility
- network energy efficiency
TSG Coordination
- Aligns with TSG RAN work on eMBB
Indoor hotspots Dense urban Urban
coverage
Rural
coverage
High speed High density
data rate very high very high medium to
high
medium medium low to medium
user
density
very high very high medium low high very high
mobility low low low to medium low to high very high low
coverage Indoor, local in-/out- door in-/out- door in-/out- door in-/out- door in-/out- door
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
40. New building block study item: eMBB
Key families of the use cases for SMARTER step 3-4*:
Broadband access in
dense area
Broadband access
everywhere
High user mobility Other services
Indoor hotspots / Dense
urban / High density
Rural coverage / Urban
coverage
Attributes - Indoor and/or outdoor
users
- High data rate
- Low mobility
- High user density
- High-rise/mid-rise
buildings
- Indoor, outdoor and
vehicular users
- Medium to high data rate
- Low to medium mobility
- Medium user density
- All users in trains or
high-speed cars
- Medium data rate
- Very high mobility
- Very high end-user
density in trains
- Lifeline
communications, e.g. in
natural disaster or
emergency situations
- Broadcast like services
Related
SMARTER
UCs
UC 5.5
UC 5.6
UC 5.7
UC 5.11
UC 5.32
UC 5.10
UC 5.30
UC 5.32
UC 5.53
UC 5.29
UC 5.53
UC 5.3
UC 5.31
UC 5.48
UC 5.56
UC 5.57
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
41. SMARTER use cases vs. CMC use case families
Ultra-high
availability and
reliability
Ultra-high
reliability &
Ultra low latency
Extreme real time
communication
Ultra-reliable
communication
Ultra low latency
NGMN 5G White
Paper v1.0
TR 22.891 V0.2.0, “Feasibility Study on New
Services and Markets Technology Enablers”
UC 5.1: Ultra-reliable communications
UC 5.12: Connectivity for drones
UC 5.13: Industrial control
UC 5.14: Tactile Internet
UC 5.15: Localized real-time control
UC 5.17: Extreme real-time communications and the tactile
internet
UC 5.18: Remote control
UC 5.33: Connected vehicles
UC 5.45: Industrial factory automation
UC 5.46: Industrial process automation
UC 5.54: Local UAV collaboration
42. New building block study item: CMC
Factors that justify a building block study for SMARTER step
3-4*:
Example requirements in various deployment scenarios
Common requirements
- high reliability
- high availability
- low latency
New vertical services
- industrial control
- remote control of drones, UAVs
- automated vehicles
- bio-connectivity**
Industrial control Remote control of drones Automated vehicles
latency very low low to medium low
reliability very high very high very high
positioning low medium to high very high
coverage Indoor, local out- door, wide area out- door, wide area
** Only some of the bio-connectivity use cases (e.g. remote surgery) require very low latency and very high reliability.
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
43. New building block study item: CMC
Key families of the use cases for SMARTER step 3-4*:
Extreme real time communication Ultra-reliable communication
Ultra low latency
Ultra-high reliability & Ultra
low latency
Ultra-high availability &
reliability
Attributes - Indoor or local users
- Very low latency
- Indoor and outdoor users
- Very low latency
- Very high reliability
- Indoor and outdoor users
- Very high availability
- Very high reliability
Related SMARTER
UCs
UC 5.14
UC 5.15
UC 5.17
UC 5.1
UC 5.12
UC 5.13
UC 5.18
UC 5.33
UC 5.45
UC 5.46
UC 5.54
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
44. SMARTER use cases vs. mIoT use case families
Mobile video
surveillance
Sensor networks
Massive Internet of
Things
Smart wearables
NGMN 5G White
Paper v1.0
TR 22.891 V0.2.0, “Feasibility Study on New
Services and Markets Technology Enablers”
UC 5.19: Light weight device configuration
UC 5.20: Wide area sensor monitoring and event driven alarms
UC 5.21: IoT Device Initialization
UC 5.22: Subscription security credentials update
UC 5.24: Bio-connectivity
UC 5.25: Wearable Device Communication
UC 5.40: Devices with variable data
UC 5.41: Domestic Home Monitoring
UC 5.42: Low mobility devices
UC 5.43: Materials and inventory management and location
tracking
UC 5.44: Cloud Robotics
UC 5.59: Massive Internet of Things M2M and device identification
45. New building block study item: mIoT
Factors that justify a building block study for SMARTER step 3-
4*:
Example requirements
• to support low complexity devices with limited communication requirements and capabilities;
• to support efficient device configuration and management for massive low power devices;
• to provide security, authentication and authorization for massive low power low complexity
devices with limited communication capacities
Common requirements
- connection density
- low complexity
- low power consumption
New vertical services
- Smart home/city
- utilities
- e-Health
- Wearables, etc.
TSG Coordination
- Extends Rel-13 TSG RAN
work
- Extends the existing SA
work
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
46. New building block study item: mIoT
Key families of the use cases for SMARTER step 3-4*:
Smart wearables Sensor networks Internet of Everything
Attributes In some cases:
- low complexity and high battery life
- high reliability
- secure connectivity
- high data rates
- Wide area or local area
- Infrequent (uplink) data transmission
- All kinds of devices, from
very simple to very complex
- Other aspects including
• Security
• Device configuration
Related
SMART UCs
UC 5.24
UC 5.25
UC 5.20
UC 5.41
UC 5.42
UC 5.43
UC 5.40
UC 5.44
UC 5.59
UC 5.19
UC 5.21
UC 5.22
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
47. SMARTER use cases
TR 22.891 V0.2.0, “Feasibility Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers”
Network slicing
Migration and
interworking
Others
• UC 5.2: Network
Slicing
• UC 5.9: Flexibility and
scalability
• UC 5.34: Mobility on
demand
• UC 5.35: Context
Awareness to support
network elasticity
• UC 5.51: Network
enhancements to
support scalability and
automation
• UC 5.4: Migration of
Services from earlier
generations
• UC 5.16: Coexistence
with legacy systems
• UC 5.27: Multi-access
network integration
• UC 5.28: Multiple
RAT connectivity and
RAT selection
• UC 5.36: In-network
caching
• UC 5.38: ICN Based
Content Retrieval
• UC 5.39: Wireless Briefcase
• UC 5.8: Flexible application
traffic routing
• UC 5.26: Best Connection
per Traffic Type
• UC 5.37: Routing path
optimization when server
changes
• UC 5.23: Access from less
trusted networks
• UC 5.47: Service Continuity
• UC 5.50: Low-delay speech
coding
• UC 5.52: Wireless Self-
Backhauling
• UC 5.55: High Accuracy
Enhanced Positioning
• UC 5.58: Green Radio
48. New building block study item: Network Operation
Factors that justify a building block study for SMARTER step
3-4*:
Flexible functions and capabilities
• Network slicing
• Flexible function / service / application allocation
• Leverage NFV / SDN
• Graceful degradation
Support new value creation
- Exploit context awareness
- Expose radio and network APIs
- Facilitate XaaS
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
49. New building block study item: Network Operation
Key families of the use cases for SMARTER step 3-4*:
Flexible functions and
capabilities
New value creation Migration and interworking
Enhancements and
Optimisations
Attributes - Network slicing
- Function variance
- Flexible
function/service/appli
cation allocation
- Leverage NFV/SDN
- Exploit big data and
context awareness
- Expose radio and
network APIs
- Facilitate XaaS
- Service migration
- Coexistence with legacy
systems
- Multiple access network
integration
- Routing optimisation
- Wireless self-backhauling
- Enhanced positioning
- Green radio
Related
SMARTE
R UCs
UC 5.2
UC 5.9
UC 5.34
UC 5.35
UC 5.51
UC 5.36
UC 5.38
UC 5.39
UC 5.4
UC 5.16
UC 5.27
UC 5.28
UC 5.8
UC 5.23
UC 5.26
UC 5.37
UC 5.47
UC 5.50
UC 5.52
UC 5.55
UC 5.58
* SP-150142, “New WID Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers (FS_SMARTER)”
51. Conclusions
• RAN to identify status & expectations on high frequencies in Q4-15 so
that the channel modeling work can start in RAN1 in Q1-16
• RAN to approve in December a Study Item to develop scenarios and
requirements for next generation radio technology
• RAN to approve in March a Study Item for RAN WGs to evaluate
technology solutions for next generation radio technology
• SA1 start four building block study item for the identified use case group:
– to identify and document the key families of use cases and their consolidated
potential requirements
– to capture desired system requirements and capabilities
• The target for the completion of building block study item is March 2016.
a native SDN/ NFV architecture covering aspects ranging from devices, (mobile/ fixed) infrastructure, network functions, value enabling capabilities and all the management functions to orchestrate the 5G system. APIs are provided on the relevant reference points to support multiple use cases, value creation and business models