The audit report summarizes issues found at M/s Basava Engineering related to quality management. Key issues identified include a lack of proper project organization and planning, no advanced quality planning, inadequate procurement activity planning, missing change management procedures, technical reviews not fully documenting feasibility studies, improper incoming goods storage, no defined process for project transfers, missing special characteristic identification and process controls, undefined defective part handling procedures, incomplete preventative maintenance planning and tool record keeping, inspection stations lacking proper documentation, no process and product audit planning, and inadequate product storage and customer complaint handling systems.

1. Audit Report Summary
M/s Basava Engineering

2. Before
Evidence
After
Project Organization
chart not available.
BASAVA ENGINEERING
( Organisation Chart )
Managing Director
( Mr. Baswaraj Honnale)
Design & Programer
( Mr. Vishal Dholas)
Production
( Mr. Sanket Sutar)
Store
( Mr.Arun Rasal )
Account
( Mr. Rohit)
QA Engineer
( Mr. Devshankar)
QC Engineer
( Mr. Santosh)
Laser Machine Operator
( Mr. Rajesh Rathod
Malhari Jagdane )
Bending Machine Operator
( Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav)
Helper Helper
Press Machine Line Welding Assembly Line
Operator
Helper
Welder
Helper
CO2 Welding
Welder
Helper
CO2 Welding
BASAVA ENGINEERING
( Organisation Chart )
Managing Director
( Mr. Baswaraj Honnale)
Design & Programer
( Mr. Vishal Dholas)
Account&
Store
( Mr. Arun)
Production&Qu
ality
( Mr. Ravi)

3. Before
Evidence
Resource was verbally
Discussed
After
Resources required for the project are not planned separately.

4. Before
Evidence
APQP not yet implemented for
the project however all project
details & study done with plan
After
APQP not yet implemented for the project however all project details & study done with plan

5. Before
Evidence
After
Procurement activity planning not in
place
Procurement activity planning not in place

6. Before
Evidence
After
No change management procedure in
place
No change management procedure in place

7. Before
Evidence
After
Technical review done but feasibility
study sheet with all details not
available.
Technical review done but feasibility study sheet with all details not available.

8. Before
Evidence
After
Only approved suppliers used & list is
available, QMS certification, cert date
& commodity.
Only approved suppliers used & list is available, QMS certification, cert date & commodity.

9. Before
Evidence
After
Incoming goods storage is not
appropriate- Area identification & layout
not done.
Incoming goods storage is not appropriate- Area identification & layout not done.
Incoming Material

10. Before
Evidence
After
No recent projects but project transfer
process not in place
No recent projects but project transfer process not in place

11. Before
Evidence
After
Special characteristics not identified in
CP & no special control defined in
process.
Special characteristics not identified in CP & no special control defined in process.

12. Before
Evidence
After
Defective part /NC part handling
procedure not defined & defective part
management is poor.
Defective part /NC part handling procedure not defined & defective part management is poor.

13. Before
Evidence
After
M/C daily maintenance check sheet
available but PM plan not available, Tool
history cards not available.
M/C daily maintenance check sheet available but PM plan not available, Tool history cards not available.

14. Before
Evidence
After
Inspection stations not appropriate- No
work instructions, skill matrix &
necessary documents.
Inspection stations not appropriate- No work instructions, skill matrix & necessary documents.
Inspection stations not appropriate- work
instructions Displayed, skill matrix &
necessary documents.

15. Before
Evidence
After
Process & product audit plan not
available.
Process & product audit plan not available.

16. Before
Evidence
After
Product storage is not appropriate-
identification, layout & storage method
needs improvement.
Product storage is not appropriate- identification, layout & storage method needs improvement.
Product storage is appropriate- identification,
layout & storage method improved.

17. Before
Evidence
After
Customer complaint handling procedure
not evident, CAPA analysis done but not
effective.
Customer complaint handling procedure not evident, CAPA analysis done but not effective.
Customer complaint handling procedure
evident, CAPA analysis done.