t8.pdf

Accelerating the world's research.
Analysis of Multi-Storey Buildings
With shear wall I- section girder in
two shape of building
IJIRT Journal
Related papers
Behaviour of Symmetrical RCC and Steel Framed Structures Under Seismic and Wind Loading
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science -IJ…
An Approach to Lessen the Stresses in Flat Slab for Earthquake Zone IV
Markanday Giri
Comparative Study on Steel Frame Building with and without Damper
IJTRD Journal
Download a PDF Pack of the best related papers 

© November 2019 | IJIRT | Volume 6 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002
IJIRT 148801 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY 203
Analysis of Multi-Storey Buildings With shear wall I-
section girder in two shape of building
Aman Sharma1
, Piyush Soni2
1,2
Dept. of Civil Engineering, RKDF College, Indore (M.P)
Abstract- Extinct earthquakes events demonstrate that,
a building with irregularity is vulnerable to earthquake
damages. So as it's essential to spot the seismic response
of the structure even in high seismic zones to cut back
the seismic damages in buildings. Objective: The most
important objective of this study is to grasp the
behavior of the structure in high seismic zone III and
also to evaluate Storey overturning moment, Storey
Drift, Lateral Displacement, Design lateral forces.
During this purpose a 10 storey-high building on four
totally different shapes like Rectangular, H-shape, and
with shear wall without shear wall are used as a
comparison we also using steel plates and I-section as
column as in building. The complete models were
analyzed with the assistance of STAAD.Pro 2015
version. In the present study, Comparative Dynamic
Analysis for all four cases have been investigated to
evaluate the deformation of the structure. Results &
Conclusion: The results indicate that, building with
severe irregularity produces more deformation than
those with less irregularity particularly in high seismic
zones. And conjointly the storey overturning moment
varies inversely with height of the storey. The storey
base shear for regular building is highest compare to
irregular shape buildings. Due to providing steel I-
section steel girder we provision of flexible building
Index terms- Rectangular Building, H- Shape of
Building, I-section steel girders
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
A high-rise building is a tall building, as opposed to a
low-rise building and is defined by its height
differently in various jurisdictions.
It is used as a residential, office building, or other
functions including hotel, retail, or with multiple
purposes combined. Residential high-rise buildings
are also known as tower block sand may be referred
to as "MDUs", standing for "multi-dwelling unit”. A
very tall high-rise building is referred to as a
skyscraper.
High-rise structures pose particular design challenges
for structural and geotechnical engineers, particularly
if situated in a seismically active region or if the
underlying soils have geotechnical risk factors such
as high compressibility or bay mud. They also pose
serious challenges to fire-fighters during emergencies
in high-rise structures. New and old building design,
building systems like the building standpipe system,
HVAC systems (heating, ventilation and air
conditioning), fire sprinkler system and other things
like stairwell and elevator evacuations pose
significant problems. Studies are often required to
ensure that pedestrian wind comfort and wind danger
concerns are addressed. In order to allow less wind
exposure, to transmit more daylight to the ground and
to appear more slender, many high-rises have a
design with setbacks.
1.2 Seismic behavior in high rise building
In large and populated cities, the need to have
buildings with various operational demands has been
in-creased. To accommodate the multiple
architectural requirements, the location, orientation,
and dimensions of the vertical and lateral load
resisting elements vary every certain number of
stories. In such cases, a transfer floor is commonly
used to solve this persistent structural-architectural
conflict.
Fig. 1.1seismic behaviour on high rise building (a)
building sway on seismic condition in height (b)
seismic effect on beam bending moment

Triangular (b) IS code based (c) Uniform
1.4 Types of Irregularities:
The irregularities are of following 2 types-
1. Plan Irregularities
2. Vertical Irregularities.
2. SEISMIC LOAD ON IRREGULARITIES
Seismic loading is one of the basic concepts of
earthquake engineering which means application of
an earthquake generated agitation to a structure,
earthquake's parameters at the site-known as seismic
hazard Geotechnical parameters of the site
Structure’s parameters Characteristics of the
anticipated gravity waves. Sometimes, seismic load
exceeds ability of a structure to resist it without being
broken, partially or completely Due to their mutual
interaction; seismic loading and seismic performance
of a structure are intimately relate.
3. ANALYSIS OF STRONG COLUMN AND
WEAK BEAM BEHAVIOUR
An earthquake resisting building is one of that has
been deliberately designed to remain safe and suffer
no appreciable damage during destructive
earthquake. However, during past earthquakes, many
buildings have collapsed due to failure of vertical
members. Hence columns in the building should be
strong and stiff so as to sustain the design earthquake
without catastrophic failure.
Fig 3.3: Ductile Chain Analogy
3.1 Shear Wall
In structural engineering, a shear wall is a vertical
element of a seismic force resisting system that is
designed to resist in-plane lateral forces, typically
wind and seismic loads. In many jurisdictions, the
International Building Code and International
Residential Code govern the design of shear walls.
Fig. 3.5Placement of shear wall
4. DETAILS OF BUILDING FOR ALL TYPES
Table: - 4.1Details of Building
sr.no. Elements of Building Dimension
1 Length x width: 36m X 37m
2 Number of stories: 10
3 Support conditions: Fixed +pin joint
4 Storey height: 3- 30m
5 Grade of concrete: M20
6 Grade of steel: Fe500
7 Size of columns from 1-10storey: 600mm x
600mm
8 Size of beams: 300mm x 500mm
9 Depth of foundation : 2.5 m
10 Seismic zones-II(0.16 )
11 Importance factor I: 1.0
12 Response reduction factor: 5.0
13 Damping ratio: 0.05
14 Soil type medium : II
15 Height of parapet wall: 1 m
16 Thickness of main wall: 200mm
17 Thickness of parapet wall: 115mm
18 Wall load : 0.200x20x(3.00-0.500)=10.2kN/m
19 Parapet wall : 0.115x20x1=2.3 kN/m
20 Slab weight : 0.130x25x1 =3.25 kN/m
21 Live load :2 kN/m2
22 Floor Finish: 1.5 kN/m2
4.1 Loadings Considered
1. Dead Load- floor load, Wall load, Parapet Load
as per to IS 875 (part1).
2. Live Load- 2 kN/m2 on all the floors.
3. Earthquake Load- As perIS 1893 (part-I):2002.

4.4. Load Combinations
Load combinations considered are as follows:
1. 1.5(DL + LL)
2. 1.5(DL + EQX)
3. 1.5(DL - EQX)
4. 1.5(DL + EQZ)
5. 1.5(DL - EQZ)
6. 1.2(DL +LL + EQX)
7. 1.2(DL +LL - EQX)
8. 1.2(DL +LL + EQZ)
9. 1.2(DL +LL - EQZ)
Fig. 4.9 isometric view Diagram of Rectangular
Building with Shear wall using R.C.C shear wall
Fig. 4.10Deflected view of Rectangular Building
with Shear wall due to (DL+LL)
Fig. 4.13 contour plate of bending moment view of
Rectangular Building with Shear wall using R.C.C
shear wall
Fig. 4.293D Rendered View of H- shape of building
with R.C.C Shear wall
5. PARAMETERS AND DIFFERENT ASPECTS
OF STUDY
5.1 Storey Drift
Controlling storey sway or inter storey drift of a
building is an important aspect because
1. It prevents pounding of adjacent buildings in
urban areas.
2. It controls plastic deformation of coupling beams
within the values that can be met.
3. It restricts damage to fragile non-structural
elements, which can be costlier than the building.
4. Drift limitation provide stability of individual
columns as well as the structure as a whole.
The storey drift M according to seismic code IS 1893
(part-I):2002 in any storey due to specified designed
lateral force with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not
exceed 0.004 times the storey height.

Figure 4.41 Story Drift
6. RESULT PARAMETERS
The performance of shear walls is assessed for High
rise building with shear wall and without SW
building having 10storeysfor different shape of
building in common earthquake zones II. The results
obtained from analysis are given in various tables and
figures are as follows: But using (steel plate) shear
wall and also using I-section column Section column
in both types of building in case of III and VI case
here discussion about maximum bending moment ,
shear force , axial force , drift of building and lateral
displacement of building respectively.
6.1 Maximum BM, Maximum SF in Beam and
Column
Table 5.1 Load of combination for all Zone II in
rectangular building
Max B.M. And Shear Force of Beam
Force Rectangular
without SW
Rectangular
with R.C.C.
shear wall
Rectangular
with steel
plate shear
wall
B.M. My 1.413 kn-m 0.881 kn-m 0.442kn-m
B.M. Mz 124.07 kn-m 81.370 kn-m 81.274kn-m
Shear
Force Fy
93.319 kn-m 97.030 kn-m 96.992 kn-m
Max B.M. And Shear Force Of Column
Forces Rectangular
without SW
KN
Rectangular
with R.C.C.
shear wall
KN
Rectangular
with steel
plate shear
wall in KN
Axial
Force Fx
4398 4009.66 4398.50
Shear
Force Fy
62.884 358.259 436.681
Shear
Force Fz
64.091 328.265 124.054
B.M. My 148.476 kn-
m
1712.895
kn-m
124.054 kn-
m
B.M. Mz 144.915 kn-
m
1645.590
kn-m
108.360 kn-
m
7. CONCLUSION
Within the scope of present work following
conclusions are drawn: all cases comparison in II
zone
We also have study about the drift and displacement
of any structure, it is a displacement of one story with
respect to other story is called story drift but in case
of story displacement, it is a displacement of all story
displacement with respect to base of structure.
1. For all the cases considered drift values follow
around similar path along storey height with
maximum value lying somewhere near about the
sixth storey.
2. For all the models considered displacement
values follow around similar gradually
increasing straight path along storey height with
maximum value at top storey.
REFERENCES
[1] 2017, MohdJamaluddin Danish, “Static and
Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building with
the Effect of Ground and Intermediate Soft
Storey having Floating Columns”, International
Journal for Scientific Research and
Development, ISSN: 2321-0613, Vol. 5, pp 44-
47.
[2] 2017, Ms.Waykule S.B,Dr. C.P. Pise, Mr. C.M.
Deshmukh, Mr. Y.P. Pawar, Mr S.S Kadam, Mr.
D. D. Mohite, Ms. S.V. Lale, “Comparative
Study of Floating Column Of Multistorey
Building By Using Software”, International
Journal of Engineering Research and
Application, ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 7, pp 31-38.
[3] Amin Alavi, P. Srinivasa Rao., Effect of Plan
Irregular RC Buildings in High Seismic Zone.
Aust. J. Basic &Appl.Sci., 7(13): 1-6, 2013.
[4] Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-1893, part 1
(2002), Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design
of Structures: Part 1General provisions and
Buildings, New Delhi, India.

[5] Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-875, part 1
(1987), Dead Loads on Buildings and Structures,
New Delhi, India.
[6] Giordano, A., M. Guadagnuolo and G. Faella,
2008. “Pushover Analysis of Plan Irregular
Masonry Buildings”. Inthe 14th world
conference on earthquake engineering. Beijing,
China, 12-17.
[7] Guleria, Abhay. "Structural Analysis of a Multi-
Storeyed Building Using ETABS for Different
PlanConfigurations." Vol. 3.Issue 5 (2014):
1481-484. International Journal of Engineering
Research & Technology (IJERT). Web. 1 May
2014.
[8] Herrera, Raul Gonzalez and Consuelo Gomez
Soberon, 2008. Influence of Plan Irregularity of
Buildings." In the14th world conference on
earthquake engineering. Beijing, China, 12-17.
[9] M.R.Wakchaure, AnantwadShirish, RohitNikam,
“Study of Plan Irregularity on High-Rise
Structures”,International Journal of Innovative
Research &Developement, Vol 1 Issue 8 October
2012.
[10]Poonam, Anil Kumar and A. K. Gupta, “Study of
Response of Structural Irregular Building
Frames to SeismicExcitations,” International
Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and
Infrastructure Engineering Research and.
[11]AnupamRajmani, Prof PriyabrataGuha (2015),
“Analysis of Wind & Earthquake Load For
Different Shapes Of High Rise Building”,
International Journal Of Civil Engineering And
Technology (IJCIET), vol. 2 , pp.38-45
[12]BhumikaPashine, V. D. Vaidya, Dr. D. P. Singh
(2016), “Wind analysis of multistoried structure
with T shape and L Shape geometry”,
International Journal of Engineering
Development and Research, vol.3, pp.2321-9939
[13]B. S. Mashalkar , G. R. Patil , A.S.Jadhav
(2015), “Effect of Plan Shapes on the Response
of Buildings Subjected To Wind Vibrations”,
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil
Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), pp.80-89
[14]Dr. K. R. C. Reddy1, Sandip A Tupat (2014),
“The effect of zone factors on wind and
earthquake loads of high-rise structures”, IOSR
Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering
(IOSR-JMCE), pp.53-58

t8.pdf

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a t8.pdf

Similar a t8.pdf (20)

Último

Último (20)

t8.pdf