2. provides useful information for making fer-
tilizer choices. If you would like to get a sec- Table 3. Soil test analysis between a
ond opinion, it may be worthwhile to hire poor area and good area of a pasture
a consultant to help you with the sampling Nutrient Poor area Good area
and the fertilizer recommendations. Nitrogen — —
To back up your fertilization program you Phosphorus OK OK
may want to take forage samples to see what Potassium low OK
effect the fertilizer had. You can also stra- Calcium OK OK
tegically utilize soil and forage tissue sam-
pling by making comparisons between Magnesium OK OK
poor growth areas and good growth areas, Sulfur OK OK
or before-and-after comparisons. The three
tables below show some hypothetical examples
of strategic soil and plant tissue sampling. Assessing soil biological
Forage analysis can be used to judge the activity and health
success of a fertilization program by iden- While nutrient status is essential to soil
tifying any remaining nutrient deficits. For health and vitality, biological activity and
Related ATTRA
publications example, the before-and-after forage analy- soil structure should be appraised to get a
sis shown in Table 1 shows that the applied more complete picture. The biological soil
Nutrient Cycling component creates and maintains many
fertilizer met all crop needs for major and
in Pastures
secondary nutrients. In addition, soil and desirable soil conditions. Many biological
A Brief Overview forage analysis taken from adjacent poor parameters are quite costly to measure and
of Nutrient Cycling and productive field areas can be used to require hours of laboratory time. Others can
in Pastures
better identify nutrient imbalances. Th is be quite inexpensive and convenient. The
Sustainable Soil is illustrated in Tables 2 and 3. Visit your following assessment procedures can be per-
Management county extension agent or a private consult- formed in an hour or so using inexpensive,
ant to learn effective methods for taking a locally available materials (Holistic Man-
forage sample. agement International, 2007). These proce-
dures are derived from Holistic Management
Table 1. Forage tissue analysis before Biological Monitoring Manual available from
and after fertilization Holistic Management International. For a
Nutrient Before fert. After fert. more complete cropland assessment, order
Nitrogen low OK this publication. Ordering information is
Phosphorus OK OK listed in the Further resources section.
Potassium low OK
Calcium OK OK
When to make these assessments
Choose a time of year when soil biological
Magnesium OK OK
activity is high, usually in late spring
Sulfur low OK and mid-fall. Select a day when the soil is
moist but not wet, after all excess water has
Table 2. Forage tissue analysis between drained away. Generally, the soil is right
a poor area and a good area for this assessment when you cannot roll
Nutrient Poor area Good area the soil into a ball and it crumbles easily in
Nitrogen low OK your hand.
Phosphorus OK OK Avoid taking samples:
Potassium low OK • From wet soils. When the soil sticks
Calcium OK OK to your shoes, it is too wet.
Magnesium OK OK • During drought periods or times of
Sulfur low OK excessive heat.
Page 2 ATTRA Assessing the Pasture Soil Resource
3. • From cold soils. Begin by selecting the first point for evalu-
• Within a month following tillage, ation at the sampling site and lay the 1-foot
fertilization or liming. diameter ring on the ground. The following
assessments are most conveniently done by
completing all six at the first point before
Equipment needed moving on to the second point.
• Pencil
• Assessment sheet Points of assessment
• Clipboard to hold the paper
1) Living organisms
• Shovel Clip all the standing vegetation within the
• Can or jar capable of holding 16 wire circle down to the ground and remove
fluid ounces (1 pint) but no more it. Pull back the soil surface litter and look for
• Small round bottle capable of holding signs of living organisms other than plants.
½ cup of water A small hand rake may help in turning the
surface litter. Count the number of different
• Bucket with 2 gallons of water for kinds of living critters, such as beetles, ants,
I
each assessment sheet to be filled out millipedes, centipedes, snails and more, on f a pasture is
• Watch with a second hand or the soil surface within the ring. Record the highly variable,
a stopwatch numbers on the assessment sheet. assess each
• Tape measure It is advisable to start turning the surface distinct area
• Hand grass clippers litter from the outside of the ring toward separately. In each
the center. This forces mobile critters to pasture unit, three
• Homemade soil penetrometer, the center where they will be seen by the
described below sampling sites
observer. If you start at the center and work
should be selected.
• A wire ring that measures 1 foot toward the ring, the critters have a chance to
across, made of wire or flexible pipe escape outside the ring undetected. With this
assessment the number of species, or diver-
Note: The length of wire required to make
sity, is more important than the number of
a circle with a 1-foot diameter is approxi-
individuals.
mately 39 inches, depending on the thick-
ness of the wire. Remember to allow some A higher number of different types of organ-
extra length to attach the two ends and isms indicates more biodiversity. The more
make the ring. Measure the diameter of biodiversity, the better the first stage of
the wire ring when the ends are attached decomposition will proceed.
to make sure it is 1 foot across.
2) Earthworms
Locating sample sites While still at the circle, count the number
An individual assessment sheet should be of wormholes inside the ring. The surface
used for each pasture. If a pasture is highly holes are the vertical burrows of nightcrawler
variable, assess each distinct area separately. worms. After counting the wormholes, insert
In each pasture unit, three sampling sites the shovel to its maximum depth and turn
should be selected. Use field maps, com- over the shovelful of soil. Break the soil apart
passes, landmarks or global positioning sys- with your hands and count the number of
tems to locate representative sample sites earthworms present. The smaller worms
that can be relocated year after year. These found with the shovel will most likely be
sites become permanent locations for assess- the surface-dweller earthworms that do not
ing change over time. Each field site can be burrow vertically.
marked on a map to aid relocation. At each Record the numbers on the assessment
sampling site, choose two points to take the sheet. Also note how easy or difficult it was
actual assessment. to shovel the soil. Turning a shovelful of
www.attra.ncat.org ATTRA Page 3
4. soil also correlates well with tilth and ease indicated here by a high score. Unstable
of tillage. The more earthworms found in aggregates break apart easily and the
this process, the better. Earthworm burrows individual soil particles can be easily eroded by
enhance water infiltration and soil aeration. runoff water. Higher scores are generally more
Earthworm digestion of soil and organic common under perennial sod. Lower scores are
matter cycles nutrients. Worms are a general generally more common on soils with annual
indicator of soil health. Earthworms may not tillage operations and clean cultivation.
be present in croplands recently converted to
Move away from the wire circle to a fresh
pasture. They should slowly return over sev-
area. Clip a small area of grass to ground level
eral years from adjacent field margins as soil
if necessary to see the soil surface clearly. Fill
health improves.
a 1-pint container with water. Holding the
container as close to the soil surface as pos-
3) Soil smell sible, gently pour the water on the soil. Try
While still at the hole dug for worm counts, to pour all the water out within five seconds,
grab a handful of topsoil and take a whiff. the idea being to avoid disrupting the soil
Record the smell on the assessment sheet as surface with the water flow, but pouring fast
follows: enough to determine how quickly the water
A
well-
soaks into the ground. Using the stopwatch,
aggregated 0.0 = putrid/chemical/sour
start timing once all the water has been
soil will take 0.2 = no smell poured out. Stop timing when the last of the
in water rapidly, as water just finishes soaking into the ground.
0.4 = fresh/earthy/sweet
will a soil with high This is the infiltration time to be recorded
numbers of vertical on the assessment sheet.
4) Aggregation
wormholes. Next, measure the wet spot across its widest
Select a soil aggregate, or crumb, from a hand-
point with the tape measure and record the
ful of topsoil. Make sure the aggregate is not
length on the assessment sheet. Pouring on a
a rock or pebble. Put the aggregate in the small
slope will influence the rate of runoff. If you
round bottle of water or the 1-pint container.
are comparing two cropping practices on
Allow it to stand for one minute, using the
sloping ground, make sure the slope is the
stopwatch to keep time. Observe if the aggre-
same under both practices since slope will
gate is breaking apart or staying intact. If it
influence the runoff rate.
stays intact after one minute, gently swirl
the bottle several times and observe again. If
it is still intact, swirl the bottle vigorously and 5) Water inf iltration
observe the aggregate again for intactness. The faster water enters the soil, the less likely
Record the following scores: it is to run off overland and cause erosion. A
well-aggregated soil will take in water rap-
1 = aggregate broke apart within one minute
idly, as will a soil with high numbers of ver-
in standing water
tical wormholes. Texture plays a significant
2 = aggregate remained intact in standing role in water infi ltration. Sandy soils will
water but broke apart after gentle swirling take in water more quickly than silty-loam
soils, and clay soils will take in water quite
3 = aggregate remained intact after gentle
slowly. Finally, since soil moisture at the time
swirling
will influence this assessment, don’t put too
4 = aggregate remained intact after vigorous much confidence in an infiltration compari-
swirling son between two fields if one is irrigated and
the other is dry.
After vigorous swirling, remove the aggregate
and smash it between your fingers to make
sure it was not a pebble. If it was a pebble, 6) Soil compaction
select another aggregate and do the test again. Assessing soil compaction requires making a
Healthy soils have very stable aggregates, simple tool beforehand. A soil penetrometer
Page 4 ATTRA Assessing the Pasture Soil Resource
5. can be constructed from a 1/4-inch rod compaction of the surface layer, which
sharpened on the end as seen in Figure 1 restricts downward water movement
below. Start with a rod that is 3 feet long. (Holistic Management International, 2007).
Use a fi le to make 1-inch marks from the
pointed end, as shown in the drawing. Conclusion
Push your homemade penetrometer into the Performing the soil organism assessment
soil as deep as you can with modest effort. described will enhance observational skills,
Record the inches of penetration up to a max- which is always beneficial. Some other use-
imum of 12 inches. Do not record any pene- ful observations include plant vigor, plant
tration depths beyond 12 inches, as we are not coloration, drought tolerance and the rate
testing for deep penetration. Avoid putting
at which livestock manure is dispersed and
all your weight into the pushing or stomp-
decayed. Healthy soil conditions are largely
ing on the penetrometer to make it go deeper.
created by the helpful soil organisms, which
Record the penetrometer depth on the assess-
ment sheet. If you hit a rock or tree root, try are beneficial with a little management to
again. For comparison, probe an undisturbed meet their needs.
natural area nearby with your penetrometer. Don’t be discouraged if the pasture assess-
As a secondary test, you may wish to probe ment numbers come up lower than expected
deeper with a longer penetrometer to locate the first time. Rather, let the results be an
any deeper hard pans to note on the comment incentive for continued commitment to soil
section of the assessment sheet. improvement. Pursue progress rather than
The deeper the probe easily penetrates the perfection. An assessment provides a starting
soil, the better. Ease of soil penetration point from which to build toward the future.
with the penetrometer correlates to deep Set your sights high. Discard the idea that
root development, ease of downward water soils require hundreds of years to build up.
flow, or no hardpan, and tillage ease. A Soils can begin to improve just a few months
probe that won’t penetrate the soil indicates after appropriate decisions are made.
Figure 1: Homemade soil penetrometer
www.attra.ncat.org ATTRA Page 5
6. References Nation, Allan. 1995. Quality Pasture. Mississippi Valley
Publishing, Corp., Jackson, MS. 285 p.
Holistic Management International. Holistic Manage- To order this publication, visit the Stockman Grass
ment Biological Monitoring Manual. 2007. 59 p. Farmer online store at www.stockmangrassfarmer.
http://holisticmanagement.org/store//page4.html
net/cgi-bin/page.cgi?id=364.html or contact Stock-
man Grass Farmer, PO Box 2300, Ridgeland, MS
Further resources
39158-9911, 1-800-748-9808, (601) 853-1861,
Anon. 1999. Soil Quality Test Kit Guide. Soil Quality
Institute. Natural Resources Conservation Service. (601) 853-8087 FAX, sgf@stockmangrassfarmer.com
USDA. Accessed May 2009. http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/ Tugel, A.J., A.M. Lewandowski and D. Happe-vonArb,
assessment/files/test_kit_complete.pdf eds. 2000. Soil Biology Primer. Ankeny, IA: Soil and
Anon. 2003. Pastureland Soil Quality – Indicators Water Conservation Society. 48 p.
for Assessment and Monitoring. Natural Resources To order this publication, visit the Soil and Water Con-
Conservation Service. USDA. Accessed May 2009. servation Society online store at http://store.swcs.org/
http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/management/files/PSQIS2.pdf index.cfm?fuseaction=c_Products.viewProduct&catI
Evanylo, Greg and Robert McGuinn. 2000. D=574&productID=5154
Agricultural Management Practices And Soil
Quality. Natural Resources and Environmental Holistic Management International. Holistic Manage-
Management. Virginia Cooperative Extension. ment Biological Monitoring Manual. 2007. 59 p.
Virginia Tech. Accessed May 2009. To order this publication, visit the HMI online store
www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/compost/452-400/452-400.html at http://holisticmanagement.org/store//page4.html
Fawcett, Richard. No date. An Introduction to Nutrient or contact Holistic Management International
Management. Conservation Technology Information Center. (HMI), 1010 Tijeras, NW, Albuquerque, NM
Accessed May 2009. http://ctic.org/media/pdf/ 87102, (505) 842-5252, (505) 843-7900 FAX,
nutrient mgmt primer_1.pdf hmi@holisticmanagement.org
Page 6 ATTRA Assessing the Pasture Soil Resource
7. Pasture Soil Assessment Sheet
Property________________________ Field _________________ Date _______ Examiner _________________
Living Soil
Earthworm Earth- Aggrega- Water Water
Points organism Soil smell penetra-
holes worms tion infiltration infiltration
types tion
species/
circle
#/circle #/shovel scorea scoreb timec distanced inches
Site I 1
2
Site II 1
2
Site III 1
2
Totals
Average*
a
smell score = 0 putrid/chemical/sour; 2 no smell; 4 fresh/earthy/sweet; for in-between smell, use odd numbers 1 or 3.
b
aggregation score – 1 = broke apart in water after 1 minute; 2 = broke apart after gentle swirling; 3 = intact after
gentle swirling; 4 = intact after vigorous swirling
c
time required for water to infiltrate into the soil
d
distance across wet spot at widest point
*
divide the total in each column by 6
Supporting Information
1. Are there signs of erosion in this field? yes ____ no_____
2. List the crops and practices done in this field in the last 2 years: __________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
www.attra.ncat.org ATTRA Page 7