6. Objectives
• Identify the reason the Constitution was
finally ratified
• Recognize the first ten amendments to the
Constitution (Bill of Rights)
7. Objectives
• Identify the reason the Constitution was
finally ratified
• Recognize the first ten amendments to the
Constitution (Bill of Rights)
• Complete the “You are the Judge” activity
12. I. Ratification Needed
A. To be approved, 9 out of 13 states had to ratify the
new Constitution
B. Arguments raged for a year between the
Federalists and Antifederalists
13. I. Ratification Needed
A. To be approved, 9 out of 13 states had to ratify the
new Constitution
B. Arguments raged for a year between the
Federalists and Antifederalists
C. July of 1788 9 of 13 states voted to ratify, and the
Constitution went into affect
14. I. Ratification Needed
A. To be approved, 9 out of 13 states had to ratify the
new Constitution
B. Arguments raged for a year between the
Federalists and Antifederalists
C. July of 1788 9 of 13 states voted to ratify, and the
Constitution went into affect
D. Only ratified because of a Bill or Rights
16. II. Early Changes
A. Framers had established a way to
amend: or change the Constitution
17. II. Early Changes
A. Framers had established a way to
amend: or change the Constitution
B. In 1791 first 10 amendments were made: the Bill of
Rights
18. II. Early Changes
A. Framers had established a way to
amend: or change the Constitution
B. In 1791 first 10 amendments were made: the Bill of
Rights
- rights that belonged to all man kind
19. II. Early Changes
A. Framers had established a way to
amend: or change the Constitution
B. In 1791 first 10 amendments were made: the Bill of
Rights
- rights that belonged to all man kind
- prevents the government from taking them away
20. II. Early Changes
A. Framers had established a way to
amend: or change the Constitution
B. In 1791 first 10 amendments were made: the Bill of
Rights
- rights that belonged to all man kind
- prevents the government from taking them away
- written by James Madison
23. Conclusion
The Court ruled by a margin of 6-3 in favor of New Jersey. The Court recognized
that students in public schools have a constitutional right to privacy under the
4th Amendment and that school officials are bound by constitutional restrictions.
But the opinion also stated that the rights of children and adolescents are
not the same as those of adults and that school officials have a
responsibility to maintain the discipline necessary for education. “The
school setting,” requires some modification of the level of suspicion of illicit
activity needed to justify a search.” The rights of students must be balanced
against the needs of the school setting.
24. Conclusion
The Court ruled by a margin of 6-3 in favor of New Jersey. The Court recognized
that students in public schools have a constitutional right to privacy under the
4th Amendment and that school officials are bound by constitutional restrictions.
But the opinion also stated that the rights of children and adolescents are
not the same as those of adults and that school officials have a
responsibility to maintain the discipline necessary for education. “The
school setting,” requires some modification of the level of suspicion of illicit
activity needed to justify a search.” The rights of students must be balanced
against the needs of the school setting.
In other words, in a school, a search could be reasonable under the 4th
Amendment without probable cause, so long as it was supported by reasonable
suspicion or reasonable cause. The assistant vice-principal's search was
considered reasonable under this definition.