SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 155
Descargar para leer sin conexión
IE Department
Strategic Planning For Gas Industries In Egypt
Under supervision of:
Prof.Dr. Attia Gomaa
2013
Case Study: Natural Gas Vehicles Company
Presented by :
Mohammed Taher
IE Department
1. Core Objectives
2. Strategic Planning Overview
3. Feasibility study overview
4. Case Study Overview (Video)
5. Annual Report Analysis
6. Strategic Objectives Analysis
7. Benchmarking Analysis
8. Proposed KPIs Report
9. Proposed Strategic Plan
10. Proposed Feasibility Study
11. Conclusion
Contents:
IE Department
1- Understand the importance of strategic planning
2- Apply effective strategic planning approach:
• To improve the customer satisfaction
• To increase the market share
• To Increase the profit ratio
• To Improve the resource productivity
• To Satisfy the Quality & HSE standards
Core Objectives:
IE Department
Now
Future
Vision, Values & Mission
 A systematic Methodology to design the
business future.
Strategic planning definition
STRATEGIC PLANNING
IE Department
Proposed Strategic Planning Process
Analysis (Environmental assessment)
Strategies
Strategic Objectives
Action Plans
SWOT Analysis
GAP Analysis
Mission
Reason for
existence
Vision
Future
intent
Values
Attitudes and
policies
SMART Goals
Company Integration Management
Feasibility Study
IE Department
• Why we exist?
• what an
organization should
look like in the
future?
Vision
• How we act?
• how an organization
should act?
Values
• How we think?
• What is our
purpose?
Mission
STRATEGIC PLANNING
IE Department
Company Integration Management
Financial
SkillsProcess
Market
Total View
IE Department
SWOT Analysis
Analysis (Environmental assessment)
SWOT Analysis
Mission
Reason for
existence
Vision
Future
intent
Values
Attitudes and
policies
Negative (Harmful)Positive (Beneficial)
WeaknessesStrengths
Internal
ThreatsOpportunities
External
IE Department
Main Strategic Directions
Financial
SkillsProcess
Market
Negative (Harmful)Positive (Beneficial)
WeaknessesStrengths
Internal
ThreatsOpportunities
External
IE Department
SWOT Analysis – Integration is key
SWOTs need Integrating
P
IE Department
Company Integration Management
Financial
SkillsProcess
Market
Strategic Objectives
Business Objectives drive the Strategic Action Plan
IE Department
Company Integration Management
Financial
SkillsProcess
Market
KPIs for each Discipline
KPI Report for Top Management
IE Department
Feasibility
Study Report
(10)
Conclusion
(4)
Technical
Study
(5)
Environmental
Study
(3)
Marketing
Study
(6)
Economical
Study
(1)
Project
Overview
(7)
Financial
Study
(2)
Location
Study
(8)
Risk
Study
(9)
How to
Management?
Proposed Feasibility Study
IE Department
CASE STUDY :
NATURAL GAS VEHICLES COMPANY
IE Department
Company Overview
Achievements:
57 stations
23 conversion centers
57 compressor units
304 refueling points running in all Egypt, a wide range of
Compressor natural gas (CNG)
THE PURPOSE OF THE COMPANY
Manufacturing , installation ,design and maintenance of natural gas in
its various operating systems for vehicles.
Design , construction , operation , maintenance , management and
ownership of gas centers and systems
Video
Car gas company achieve government plans to minimize
petroleum support
IE Department
IE Department
 Mission:
Commercializing vehicular natural gas as the best alternative fuel for vehicles within
the Arab Republic of Egypt and worldwide.
 Vision:
Build market leadership and distinctiveness to break away from competition and to
become the undisputed leader in global vehicular natural gas industry
 Core Values
Change culture
safety awareness (within the processes an toward clients)
Team work
Customer satisfaction
sustainability
Quality of process
Efficiency
IE Department
Comments
1-Vision: where the organization wants to go
in the future ?
- Not future intent
2-Mission :how we think??
Not sufficient reasons for existence
3-Not clear and sample.
4-Not focused and objective.
IE Department
‫المنتدب‬ ‫العضو‬‫و‬ ‫ة‬‫االدار‬ ‫مجمس‬ ‫رئيس‬
‫خجٍـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــش‬
‫تكميــف‬
‫بأعمال‬ ‫قائم‬
‫منتـــدب‬
‫المىتــــــــــــــــذة‬ ُ‫الؼض‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫االداسح‬ ‫مجلظ‬ ‫لشئُن‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫لّمــــــــــــــــــــــــــه‬
‫مغبػذ‬
‫الششكخ‬ ‫سئٍظ‬
‫الجشـــــشٌخ‬ ‫للمُاسد‬
‫مغبػذ‬
‫الششكخ‬ ‫سئٍظ‬
‫التجبسٌــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬
‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫َاالقتصبدٌخ‬ ‫الفىٍخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬
‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫للؼملٍـــــــــــــــــــبد‬
‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫المبلٍـــــــــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬
‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫المذوٍخ‬ ‫للمشــشَػبد‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫الذاخلٍــــــــخ‬ ‫للمشاجؼخ‬
‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫الجشــــــشٌخ‬ ‫للمُاسد‬
‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫التجبسٌــــــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫َالذػبٌخ‬ ‫التغٌُق‬ ‫لجذُث‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫للمٍمـــــــــــــــــــبد‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫للضٌـــــــــــــــــــــُد‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫للىقـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــل‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫المٍىٍخ‬ ‫َالصذخ‬ ‫للغالمخ‬
‫الجٍئخ‬ ‫َدمبٌخ‬
‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫المؼلُمبد‬ ‫لتكىُلُجٍب‬
‫َاالتصبالد‬
‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬
‫االقبوُوٍــــــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬
Organization structure
IE Department
Proposed Financial
Indicators
1) Profit Ratio
2) Revenue
3) Total Cost
4) Inventory Turnover
5) Value Added
6) Assets Turnover
7) CAPEX
IE Department
 Profit ratio = Net profit / Revenue
 Total cost = revenue – profit
 Revenue = Total cost + Profit
 Value added ratio =(revenue- external cost )/external cost
 Inventory turnover = Sales Cost / Average inventory cost
 Assets turnover = Revenue / assets (CAPEX)
IE Department
Profit ratio
conversion
net profit revenue
Refuelling
net profit revenue
lubrication
net profit revenue
Profit ratio
IE Department
Total cost
conversion
revenue
profit
refueling
revenue
profit
lubrication
revenue
profit
Total cost
IE Department
revenue
conversion
total cost profit
refueling
total cost profit
lubrication
total cost profit
Revenue
IE Department
Inventory
turnover
Income Annual inventory cost
Inventory turnover
IE Department
Value
added
Revenue
External
cost
Running
cost
Sales
cost
Overhead
cost
Value added
IE Department
Assets turnover
Revenue Assets (capex)
Assets turnover
IE Department
CAPEX
Fixed assets
project under
Implementation
Investments in
bonds
CAPEX
IE Department
Current situation Analysis:
RespondCurrent 2010Actual 2009unitItem
conversion0.5770.51---Profit ratio
57.7251%
refueling0.2770.242---
27.7924.2%
Lubrication0.941.32---
94132%
conversion39,799,94135,247,714L.ERevenue
refuelings82,649,15874,152,628L.E
lubrication24,224,78313,614,716L.E
All activities173,758,960144,849,764L.ETotal rev.
IE Department
conversion24,997,22023,232,329L.ETotal cost
refueling33,212,14629,647,281L.E
lubrication16,654,74610,019,521L.E
All activities145,603,289117,529,116L.E
All activities70,739,17754,629,986L.ERunning cost
All activities356,45297.16%Inventory turnover
All activities85,269,27076,209,414L.EValue added
All activities113.494.8%Assets turnover
All activities153,224,223152,755,621L.ECapex
Current situation Analysis:
IE Department
Current situation Analysis:
varianceResponActual 2010Actual 2009UnitItem
13.17conversion57.7251%Profit ratio
14.83Refueling27.7924.2
-28.79Lubrication94132
27.57conversion39,799,94135,247,714%revenue
24.19Refueling82,649,15874,152,628%
216.5lubrication24,224,78313,614,716L.E
19.95All companies356.45297.16L.EInventory
turnover
IE Department
25.19All companies85,269,27076,209,414L.EValue added
19.62All companies113.494.8%Assets turnover
70All companies153,224,2231,527,556L.ECapex
15.71conversion107.592.9%Total cost
25.56Refueling11289.2
176.5lubrication166.260.1
Current situation Analysis:
IE Department
Benchmarking Analysis
External company
Italian company
(landirenzo)
Internal
benchmarking
(car gas company
in 2007)
IE Department
Performancelevel
Time line
Current situation
World class
(landyrinzo)
The
competition
What's the
Gap?
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
IE Department
Strategic objective:
External
benchmark
Internal
benchmark
Current
2010
Actual
2009
unitItem
9065577251%Profit ratio
704027.7924.2
18015094132
180150112.988.5%revenue
200150111.489.7
280200177.956.20
7080107.592.9%Total cost
758011289.2
8075166.260.1
IE Department
400360356.45297.16%Inventory
turnover
180140111.889.3%Value added
200150113.494.8%Assets turnover
200120100.399.6%Capex ratio
Strategic objective:
IE Department
Performancelevel
Time line
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Target
Current
IE Department
Current
(2010)
Target
(2011)
Goal
(2012)
Goal
(2015)
Improve
20%
Improve
20%
Improve
20%
Long Term Continuous Improvement
IE Department
Goals & Target:
responsGoal
2014
Goal
2013
Goal
2012
Target
2011
Current
2010
UnitItem
conversion908575657.72%Profit ratio
refueling7060504027.79
Lubrication18017016015054
Conversion200180170150112.9%Revenue
Refueling200180170150111.4
Lubrication280260230200177.9
Conversion50607080107.5%Total cost
Refueling50607080112
Lubrication40506075166.2
IE Department
All400380370360356.45%Inventory
turnover
All180170160140111.8%Value added
All200180170150113.4%Assets
turnover
All200175150120100.3%Capex ratio
Goals & Target:
IE Department
 Financial KPI:
Strength
points
• Revenue (24.19%)
• Value added (25.19%)
• CAPEX ratio (70%)
• Inventory turnover (19.9%)
Weakness
points
• Total cost (15.7%)
• Profitability (-28.7%)
• Assets turnover (19.6%)
IE Department
Market kPI:
IE Department
Market Indicators :
1. Market Share
2. Number Of Customers
3. Claim Ratio
4. Market Value Added
5. Competition Ratio
6. Customer Satisfaction Level
7. Sales Quantity
8. Market Quantity
IE Department
Market share
A percentage of total sales volume in a market
captured by a brand, product, or company.
Market share =sales quantity/overall market quantity
IE Department
market
share
cionversion
sales Q
no. of cars
per month
market Q
total no. of
cars per
month
re-fuelling
sales Q
sales of
gas per
month
market Q
total sales
of gas per
month
Market share
IE Department
Indicator 2009 2010
Sales quantity 360 * 12 = 4320
car/year
813*12=9756
car/year
Market quantity 986 * 12 = 11832
cars/year
1621*12=19452
cars/year
Market share 4320 / 11832 = 36.5
%
50.1 %
Conversion:
IE Department
Re-fuelling:
Indicator 2009 2010
Sales quantity 12.3*12 = 147.6
M m2/year
16.4 * 12 = 196.8
M m2/year
Market quantity 31 * 12 = 372
M m2/year
39 * 12 = 468
M m2/year
Market share 147.6/372 = 39.9% 196.8/468=42%
IE Department
Number of customers
The total number of cars which were
converted and amount of gas sold within
the company since the beginning of the
activity
IE Department
number of
customers
conversion
total
customers for
conersioning
into gas
re-fuelling
total number of
customers to
re-fuelling
Number of customers
IE Department
Indicator 2009 2010
Conversion number
of customers
45508 cars 62433 cars
Re-fuelling number
of customers
103,229 cars 145565
Number of customers
IE Department
Sales quantity
The amount of million meter of gas
sold annually
The amount of cars which were
converted annually
IE Department
sales
quantity
conversion
number of
cars per
month
re-fuelling
number of
million meter
of gas
Sales quantity
IE Department
Indicator 2009 2010
Conversion sales
quantity
360*12 = 4320 cars 813*12= 9756 cars
Re-fuelling sales
quantity
12.3 * 12 =
147.6 Mm3
16.4*12=
196.8 Mm3
Sales quantity
IE Department
Market quantity
Is defined as the amount of cars or
meter of gas consumption during the
month corresponding to the overall
market consumption
IE Department
market
quantity
conversion
number of
cars per
month/overall
re-fuelling
total sales of
gas
Market quantity
IE Department
Indicator 2009 2010
Conversion
market quantity
986*12 = 11,832
cars
1621*12 = 19,452
cars
Re-fuelling
market quantity
31*12 = 372 Mm3 39*12 = 468 Mm3
Market quantity
IE Department
Customer satisfaction ratio
The degree of satisfaction provided by
the goods or services of a company as
measured by the number of repeat
customers
Customer satisfaction ratio = (total no of cars- total no of rejected)/total
no of cars
IE Department
Customer
satisfaction
conversion
total
number of
cars
number of
rejected
cars
Customer satisfaction ratio
IE Department
Indicator calculations 2009 2010
Customer
satisfaction
ratio
=
97%
=
99.4
Customer satisfaction ratio
IE Department
Competition ratio
Is the ratio of the company’s sales
quantity to the others competitors
sales quantity
IE Department
competition
ratio
conversion
number of cars
converted from
the beginning
at Car gas
total number of
cars
number of
stations (
fuelling)
number of
Cargas
stations
total number of
stations
Competition ratio
IE Department
Indicator calculations 2009 2010
Conversion
competition ratio
45508/103229
=
44 %
62433/145565
=
42%
Re-fuelling
competition ratio
52/119 =
43%
57/137 =
41%
Competition ratio
IE Department
Claims ratio
The ratio of the cost of claims to the
corresponding premiums, either gross or
net of reinsurance
Claims ratio=no of rejected cars/total no of
cars
IE Department
claims ratio
conversion
total
number of
claims
number of
cars per
year
Claims ratio
IE Department
Indicator 2009 2010
Claims rate 3 9
Number of rejected cars 129 878
Total number of cars 4320 9756
Claims ratio 2 % 8%
Claims ratio
IE Department
Current Situation Analysis
Conversion:
Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility
Market share % 36.5 50.1 Market Dept.
Number of
customers
Cars 45508 62433 Market Dept.
Claim ratio % 2 8 Market Dept.
Competition ratio % 44 42 Market Dept.
Customer
satisfaction
Cars 4214 9703 Market Dept.
Sales quantity Cars 4320 9756 Market Dept.
Market quantity Cars 11832 19452 Market Dept.
IE Department
Re-fuelling:
Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility
Market share % 39.9 42 Market Dept.
Number of
customers
cars 103229 145565 Market Dept.
Claim ratio % 41.4 58% Market Dept.
Competition ratio % 43 41 Market Dept.
Sales quantity Cars 147.6
(42.8 %)
196.8
(57.4 %)
Market Dept.
Market quantity cars 372
(44.2 %)
468
(55.7 % )
Market Dept.
IE Department
Current Situation Analysis
Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility Variance
%
Market share % 36.5 50.1 Market Dept. 37.2
Cumulative #
of customers
cars 45508
(over 15 y)
62433
(over 16 y)
Market Dept. 37.19
Claim ratio % 2 8 Market Dept. 300
Competition
ratio
% 44 42 Market Dept. 4.54
Customer
satisfaction
Cars
%
4214
( 98 %)
9703
( 92 %)
Market Dept. 130.2
Sales quantity Cars 4320 9756 Market Dept. 125
Market
quantity
cars 11832 19452 Market Dept. 64.4
Conversion:
IE Department
Re-fuelling:
Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility Variance
Market share % 39.9 42 Market Dept. 5.26
Number of
customers
cars 103229 145565 Market Dept. 41.01
Claim ratio % 41.4 58% Market Dept.
Competition
ratio
% 43 41 Market Dept. -4.65
Sales quantity Cars 147.6
(42.8 %)
196.8
(57.4 %)
Market Dept. 33
Market
quantity
cars 372
(44.2 %)
468
(55.7 % )
Market Dept. 25.8
IE Department
Benchmarking Analysis
External company
(landirenzo)
Internal
benchmarking
(car gas company
in 2007)
IE Department
Performancelevel
Time line
Current situation
World class
(landirenzo)
The
competition
What's the
cap?
2010 2011 2012 2013
2014
IE Department
Strategic objectives
Item Unit 2009 2010 Internal
benchmark
External
benchmark
Market share % 36.5 50.1 65 75
Number of
customers
cars 45508
(42 %)
62433
(57 % )
65 % 80 %
Claim ratio % 2 8 5 1
Competition
ratio
% 44 42 50 80
Customer
satisfaction
Cars 4214
(30%)
9703
(69%)
75 % 90 %
Sales quantity Cars 4320
(30.6 %)
9756
(69.3%)
75 % 90 %
Market
quantity
cars 11832
(37.8 % )
19452
( 62.1 %)
75 % 85 %
Conversion:
IE Department
Re-fuelling :
Item Unit 2009 2010 Internal
benchmark
External
Benchmark
Market share % 39.9 42 50 70
Number of
customers
cars 103229
(41.4 %)
145565
(58.5 %)
60 % 85%
Claim ratio % 41.4 58% --- ---
Competition
ratio
% 43 41 50 70
Sales
quantity
Cars 147.6
(42.8 %)
196.8
(57.4 %)
60 % 85 %
Market
quantity
cars 372
(44.2 %)
468
(55.7 % )
65 % 85 %
IE Department
Performancelevel
Time line
2010 2011 2012 2013
2014
target
current
IE Department
Current
(2010)
Target
(2011)
Goal
(2012)
Goal
(2015)
Improve
20%
Improve
20%
Improve
20%
Long Term Continuous Improvement
IE Department
Goals and Targets
Conversion:
Item Unit 2009
(current)
2010
(target)
2011
(goal)
2012
(goal)
2013
(goal)
Market share % 36.5 50.1 65 70 75
Number of
customers
% 42 57 65 75 80
Claims ratio % 2 8 5 3 1
Competition
ratio
% 44 42 50 65 80
Customer
satisfaction
% 30 69 75 80 90
Sales
quantity
% 30.6 69.3 75 80 90
Market
quantity
% 37.8 62.1 70 80 85
IE Department
Re-fuelling:
Item Unit 2009
(current)
2010
(target)
2011
(goal)
2012
(goal)
2013
(goal)
Market
share
% 39.9 42 50 60 70
Number of
customers
% 41.4 58.5 60 70 85
Competition
ratio
% 43 41 50 60 70
Sales
quantity
% 42.8 57.1 60 75 85
Market
quantity
% 44.2 55.7 65 75 85
IE Department
Market kPI:
Strength
point
• Market share (37.2%)
• Number of customers (37.19%)
• Customer satisfaction (130.2%)
• Sales quantity (125%)
• Market quantity (64.4%)
Weakness
point
• Claim ratio (300%)
• Competition ratio (4.5% )
IE Department
Skill’s kPI :
IE Department
Skill’s Indicators:
1. Attendance
2. Labor productivity
3. Employee turnover
4. Injury rate
5. Illness rate
6. Quality of training
IE Department
Attendance
Attendance is the act of attending work. The
attendance rate tells you the average
percentage of employee attending the
company each day in the given year
Attendance % =
(total no of employee –Absent )/total no of employee
IE Department
Attendance
total number
of Employee
Absent
Attendance
IE Department
Attendance 2009 = 90 %
Attendance 2010 = 70 %
Attendance
IE Department
Labor productivity
Rate of output per worker (or a group of
workers) per unit of time as compared with
an established standard or expected rate
of output.
Labor productivity = total quantity / man-hr
IE Department
Labor productivity
Conversion
total
number of
cars
man hour "
working
hours"
Re-fuelling
total
quantity
sold
working
hours
Labor productivity
IE Department
Indicator Unit 2009 2010
Conversion Car/Man-Day = 2 = 4
Re-Fuelling Mm3 /Man-Day = 0.02 = 0.026
Labor productivity
IE Department
Employee turnover
The ratio of the number of employees that
leave a company through attrition,
dismissal, or resignation during a period to
the number of employees on payroll during
the same period.
IE Department
Employee turnover for 2009  1%
Employee turnover for 2010  0.9%
Employee turnover
IE Department
Injury rate
Injury rate
number of
Injured
employee
The number of injuries which happens to the workers during working within the
stations
IE Department
Injury Rate  2009 = 0.25%
Injury Rate  2010 = 0.23%
Injury rate
IE Department
Illness rate
The illness rate is calculated by
comparing employee illness-related
absences against planned working time,
within a specific period
Illness rate = No of illed employee/total no of
employee
IE Department
Illness
Rate
Number of
illed
Employee
Total
Number of
Employee
Illness rate
IE Department
Indicator 2009 2010
Illness rate 400/1457 = 0.27 = 27% 475/1457 = 0.32 = 32.6 %
Illness rate
IE Department
Quality Of
Training
Number of
Trainee
Quality Of Training
Is defined as the ratio between the planned courses attenders to the actual
workers who attended those course
IE Department
Indicator Unit 2009 2010
Actual Training
Courses
Attendees
Employee/Year 193 295
Planes Training
Courses
Attendees
Employee/Year 700 700
Quality Of Training
IE Department
Current Situation Analysis
Item Unit Actual
(2009)
Current
(2010)
Responsibility Comment
Attendance % 90 70 HR
Labor
Productivity
Car/Man-Day 2 4 Conversion
Mm3/Man-Day 0.02 0.026 Re-Fuelling
Employee
Turnover
% 1 0.9 HR
Injury Rate % 0.25 0.23 HR
Illness Rate % 27 32.6 HR
Actual
Quality Rate
Employee/Day 193 295 HR
Planned
Quality Rate
Employee/Day 700 700 HR
IE Department
Current Situation Analysis:
Item Unit Actual
(2009)
Current
(2010)
Responsibility Variance
%
Comment
Attendance % 90 70 HR -22.2
Labor
Productivity
Car/Man-
Day
2 4 Conversion 100
Mm3/Man
-Day
0.02 0.026 Re-Fuelling 30
Employee
Turnover
% 1 0.9 HR -10
Injury Rate % 0.25 0.23 HR -8
Illness Rate % 27 32.6 HR 20.7
Actual
Quality Rate
Employee
/Day
193 295 HR 52.8
Planned
Quality Rate
Employee
/Day
700 700 HR ---
IE Department
Benchmarking Analysis
External company
(landirenzo)
Internal
benchmarking
(car gas company
in 2007)
IE Department
Performancelevel
Time line
Current situation
World class
(landyrinzo)
The
competition
What's the
cap?
2010 2011 2012 2013
2014
IE Department
Strategic objectives
Item Unit Actual
(2009)
Current
(2010)
Internal
Benchmark
External
Benchmark
Attendance % 90 70 95 100
Labor
Productivity
Car/Man-Day 2 4 6 10
Mm3/Man-Day 0.02 0.026 0.027 0.03
Employee
Turnover
% 1 0.9 2 10
Injury Rate % 0.25 0.23 0.2 0.01
Illness Rate % 27 32.6 20 10
Actual Quality
Rate
Employee/Day 193 295 70 95
IE Department
Performancelevel
Time line
2010 2011 2012 2013
2014
target
current
IE Department
Current
(2010)
Target
(2011)
Goal
(2012)
Goal
(2015)
Improve
20%
Improve
20%
Improve
20%
Long Term Continuous Improvement
IE Department
Goals and targets
Item Unit Current
(2010)
Target
(2011)
Goal
(2012)
Goal
(2013)
Goal
(2014)
Attendance % 70 95 96 97 100
Labor
Productivity
Car/Man-
Day
4 6 7 8 10
Mm3/Man-
Day
0.026 0.027 0.026 0.028 0.03
Employee
Turnover
% 0.9 2 5 7 10
Injury Rate % 0.23 0.2 0.1 0.09 0.01
Illness Rate % 32.6 20 15 12 10
Actual Quality
Rate
Employee/D
ay
295 70 80 90 95
IE Department
Skills kPI :
Strength
point
• Labor productivity (100%)
• Quality rate (52.8%)
• Illness rate (20.7%)
Weakness
point
• Attendance (-22.2%)
• Employee turnover (-10%)
• Injury rate (-8%)
IE Department
Process kPI :
IE Department
Process Indicators:
1. Performance rate.
2. Quality rate
3. Process utilization
4. Defect ratio
5. Maximum operation hours
6. Process consumption
7. Number of activities
8. Capacity
IE Department
Performance rate = total quantity/working hours
Performance rate
The job related activities expected of a
worker and how well those activities were
executed. Many business personnel
directors assess the employee
performance of each staff member on an
annual or quarterly basis in order to help
them identify suggested areas for
improvement.
IE Department
Performance
rate
Conversion
Total no. of
converted
working
hrs.
Sales of gas.
Total
quantity of
gas
Working hrs
Performance rate
IE Department
Quality rate = Accepted Quantity/Total quantity
Measures of good or service
characteristics based on customer
specifications and expectations, and which
are essential elements in achieving
customer satisfaction.
Quality rate
IE Department
Quality rate
Conversion
Accepted
conversion
cars
Total
converted
cars
Sales of gas
Accepted
gas sales
Total
quantity of
saling gas
Quality rate
IE Department
Defect ratio = Total quantity – Accepted quantity
Defect ratio
A defect rate shows how many errors in
production occur on average
IE Department
Defect ratio
Total
quantity
Conversion Sales of gas
Accepted
quantity
Conversion Sales of gas
Defect ratio
IE Department
Max. Operation hrs = Time of converting 1 car * total no. of car/years
Max. Operation hrs = time of filling 1 car*total no. of cars /years
Maximum operation hours
The maximum allowable hours which the
worker operates at during the whole year
IE Department
Maximum operation hours
Max.
operation
hrs.
Conversion
Time of
converting
1 car
Total no. of
cars/year
Sales of gas
Time of
filling 1 car
Total no. of
cars/year
IE Department
No. of activities = Sales Quantity /years
No. of activities =No of converted cars /years
Number of activities
Its defined For the conversion process to
be the number of converted cars that the
operated done annualy
And for the re-fuelling activity it can be
defined as the actual sold quantity of gas
during the year
IE Department
No. of Activities
Conversion Sales of cars
Number of activities
IE Department
Capacity = Actual capacity/planned capacity
Capacity
Highest sustainable output rate (maximum number of units per month,
quarter, or year) that can be achieved with current resources, maintenance
strategies, product specifications
IE Department
Capacity
Capacity
Conversion
Actual
capacity
production
Planned
capacity
production
Sales of
gas
Actual
sales of
capacity
Planned
sales
capacity
IE Department
Current situation Analysis:
VarianceResponsibility20102009UnitItem
100process1200600Car/yearPerformance
rate
12process76.968.64%Quality rate
100process104 (66%)52 (33%)Car-yearDetect ratio
126process39024
(69.3%)
17280
(30.6%)
Hr-yearMax.
operation hrs
38.7process9756
(69.3%)
4320
(30.6%)
Car/yearNo. of
activities
49.1%process88%59%%Capacity ratio
Conversion:
IE Department
Sales of gas
Variance
%
Responsibility20102009UnitItem
31.7process0.0270.0205Mm3 /yearPerformance rate
1.02process9998%Quality rate
-39.5%process120,000
(37.5%)
200,000
(62%)
Mm3/gasDetect ratio
37.2%process5202
(57.8%)
3792.3
(42.1%)
Hrs-yearMax. operation hrs
34%process16.41
(57%)
12.3
(42.6%)
M-m3Fuel consumption
-24.4%process147.6
(43%)
19506
(56.9%)
Mm3/yearNo. of activities
4%process104%100%%Capacity ratio
IE Department
Strategic objective
Conversion:
External
benchmark
Internal
benchmark
20102009UnitItem
250015001200600Car/yearPerformance
rate
957567.968.64%Quality rate
80%70%66%33%%Detect ratio
87%75%69.3%30.6%%Max.
operation hrs
85%74%69.3%30%%No. of
activities
96%90%88%59%%Capacity ratio
IE Department
Sales of gas:
External
benchmark
Internal
benchmark
20102009UnitItem
500000003500000273333320500Mm3 /yearPerformance
rate
10099.59998%Quality rate
10%30%37.5%62%%Defect ratio
77%65%57.8%42.1%%Max.
operation hrs
76%64%57%42.6%%Fuel
consumption
80%65%43%56.9%%No. of
activities
130%115%104100%Capacity ratio
IE Department
Goals and target
Conversion
20142013201220112010Item
25002300190015001200Performance
rate
9586807567.9Quality rate
5%10%20%33%66%Defect ratio
87%80%77%75%69.3%Max.
operation hrs
85%80%75%74%69.3%No. of
activities
96%95%92%90%88%Capacity
ratio
IE Department
Sales of gas
20142013201220112010Item
5000000046000000400000035000002733333Performance
rate
10099.999.799.599Quality rate
10%20%25%30%37.5%Detect ratio
77%70%68%65%57.8%Max.
operation hrs
80%75%70%65%43%No. of
activities
76%74%68%64%57%Fuel
consumption
130%125%120%115%104%Capacity
ratio
IE Department
KPI process :
Strength
points
• Defect ratio (-39.5%)
• Max. operation hours (37%)
• Capacity ratio (4%)
Weakness
point
• No. of activities (-24.4%)
sales of gas
IE Department
Strength
points
• 1)Max. operation (126%)
• 2)No. of activities (38.7%)
• 3)Capacity ratio (49.1%)
Weakness
points
• Detect ratio (33%)
conversion
KPI process :
IE Department
KPI Report
Strength points:
Revenue (24.19%)
Value added (25.9%)
CAPEX ratio (70%)
Inventory turnover (19.9%)
Market share (37.2%)
Customer satisfaction (130.2%)
Sales quantity (125%)
Labor productivity (100%)
Market Quantity (64.4%)
Capacity ratio (4.5%)
IE Department
Weakness points
Total cost (15.7%)
Profitability (-28.7%)
Assets turnover (19.5%)
Claim ratio (300%)
Competition ratio (4.5%)
Attendance (-22.2%)
Employee turnover (-10%)
Injury rate (-8%)
Defect ratio (-39.5%)
No. of activities (-24.4%)
KPI Report
IE Department
Threats
New technology for design
New technology for stations
New technology for services
More competition
External factors
KPI Report
IE Department
opportunities
Change in petroleum prices
New markets
Online markets
Development of Information system
Development in gas technology
KPI Report
IE Department
Recommendations :
Change in management culture
Change in customer culture
Market motivation
Training plan Improvement
Increase the station gas
Development of manufacturing the cylinders gas
KPI Report
IE Department
Action strategic plan
Main
Objective Main Items Budget Duration Start Finish Responsible
Increase
the
station
gas
4 New Stations:
1.Matrya
2.Aaz eldin
3.Elatamia
4.New cairo
11000000 3
years
1/1/
2012
1/1/
2015
Process
department
Training
Improve
ment
New Courses:
Process
Safety
Quality
Market 100000
2
years
15/5/
2012
15/5/
2014
HR
department
IE Department
Feasibility study
For Example:
Matrya station in car gas company
IE Department
IE Department
IE Department
Item Unit Year #1 Year #2 Year #3 …. Year #n
Market Information:
Investment Information:
Technical Information:
Cost Elements Information:
Others Information:
Bank interest rate= i % MARR = I % Project duration= n years
Case Study: Feasibility Study for
IE Department
• Technical study
(daily working hours, daily production, machine utilization,
, space layout, etc)
• Economical study
(unit cost, unit price, profit %, CAPEX %, OPEX %,
Value added %, Margin factor %, etc)
• Financial study
(salvage value, cash flow, payback period, NPV,, IRR, etc)
• Environmental & Safety study
(safety policy, safety tools & equipment, etc)
• Management Study
(vision, values, mission, organization structure, KPI report, etc).
IE Department
Technical study
Daily working hours
Daily production
Machine utilization
Quality policy
Space layout
IE Department
54321units
72007200720072007200Hr/yearWorking hr
18001770172516501500Car/yea
r
Annual
converted
cars
420000039000003600000330000030000000m³/yearDaily
production
0.660.670.700.700.75%Machine
ulitilization
IE Department
Economical study
Unit cost
Unit price
Profit (%)
Capex(%)
Opex(%)
Value added(%)
Margin factor
IE Department
54321unitsItems
0.400.400.400.40o.40LEUnit
cost
4545454545LEUnit
price
68.968.968.868.868.8%Profit
453052
9
453052
9
453052
9
453052
9
453052
9
LEcapex
660336660336660336660336660336LEopex
6.87.58.39.22.6%Value
added
0.090.090.090.090.09%Margin
factor
IE Department
Financial study
Deprecation
Salvage value
Cash flow
Payback period
Net present value
Internal rate of return
IE Department
54321unitItems
100000100000100000100000100000LEBuilding
28500002850000285000028500002850000LEcompressor
5357153571535715357153571LEStorage
/storage
30035713003571300357130035713003571LETotal
deprecation
IE Department
54321unitItems
19000001900000190000
0
190000
0
190000
0
LEbuilding
350000350000350000350000350000LECompressor/stor
age
696428696428696428696428696428LESpenser
Salvage value
IE Department
Cash flow
-4530529
1577583
945820
98978
9
1164682
3329200
1
0
1 2 3 4 5
IE Department
Payback period=4+(1017341/1164682)=4.8
NPV=-45530529+1577583(P/F,i,n)+945820(P/F,I,n)+
989789(P/F,I,n)+1164682(P/F,I,n)+33292001(P/F,I,n)
0=-45530529+1577583/(1+IRR)^1+ 945820/(1+IRR)^2+
989789/(1+IRR)^3+1164682/(1+IRR)^4+33292001/(1+I
RR)^5 =8.5%
IRR=8.5%
IE Department
Environmental study
Safety policy
Safety tool
Safety equipment
IE Department
Car Gas H.S.E. Policy is based on managing and
conducting its activities in a way that :
‫إداسح‬ ‫ػلى‬ ‫الجٍئخ‬ ‫َدمبٌخ‬ ‫َالغالمخ‬ ‫للصذخ‬ ‫جبط‬ ‫كبس‬ ‫عٍبعخ‬ ‫تؼتمذ‬
‫ػلى‬ ‫ٌؤكذ‬ ‫الزي‬ ُ‫الىذ‬ ‫ػلى‬ ‫أوشطتٍب‬ ‫َمجبششح‬:
-Safety is the responsibility of every member of the
company.
-‫الششكخ‬ ً‫ف‬ ُ‫ػض‬ ‫كل‬ ‫مغئُلٍخ‬ ‫الغالمخ‬ ‫أن‬.
-Positively act to protect the health and safety of its
personnel, and others who may be affected by
these activities, and take the necessary precautions
to prevent adverse effects on the physical
environment in which its activities are conducted
within the law and in compliance with relevant
regulations.
-‫َلُخشٌه‬ ‫لؼبملٍٍب‬ ‫الغالمخ‬ ‫َتُفٍش‬ ‫الجٍئخ‬ ‫دمبٌخ‬ ‫ػلى‬ ً‫إٌجبث‬ ‫ثشكل‬ ‫الؼمل‬
‫لمىغ‬ ‫الالصمخ‬ ‫الُقبئٍخ‬ ‫التذاثٍش‬ ‫كبفخ‬ ‫اتخبر‬ ‫مغ‬ ‫اِوشطخ‬ ‫ثٍزي‬ ‫ٌتأثشَا‬ ‫قذ‬ ‫الزٌه‬
ً‫ب‬‫طجق‬ ‫أوشطتٍب‬ ‫مجبششح‬ ‫الششكخ‬ ‫فٍٍب‬ ‫تتُلى‬ ً‫الت‬ ‫للجٍئخ‬ ‫مىبَئخ‬ ‫تأثٍشاد‬ ‫أي‬
ً‫ل‬ ‫المكملخ‬ ‫َاللُائخ‬ ‫القبوُن‬ ‫ِدكبم‬.
-No part of its business objectives can be carried
out effectively and successfully if not performed
safely.
-‫ػه‬ ‫إال‬ ‫َوجبح‬ ‫ثفبػلٍخ‬ ‫ٌتذقق‬ ‫ال‬ ‫الششكخ‬ ‫أٌذاف‬ ‫مه‬ ‫جضء‬ ‫أي‬ ‫تىفٍز‬ ‫أن‬
‫اَمه‬ ‫اِداء‬ ‫الغالمخ‬ ‫إتجبع‬ ‫طشٌق‬.
-It is an essential duty of line managers and
supervisors to promote the health and safety of all
personnel and to ensure the integration of this
policy into all stages of operation, maintenance of
equipment, systems of work, associated activities
and the analysis of all accident in order to prevent
its recurrence in future.
-‫َعالمخ‬ ‫ثصذخ‬ ‫االستقبء‬ ٌُ ‫َالمششفٍه‬ ‫للمذٌشٌه‬ ً‫اِعبع‬ ‫الُاجت‬ ‫أن‬
‫التشغٍل‬ ‫مشادل‬ ‫جمٍغ‬ ‫داخل‬ ‫الغٍبعخ‬ ‫ٌزي‬ ‫اوذمبج‬ ‫َتأكٍذ‬ ‫الؼبملٍه‬ ‫جمٍغ‬
‫جمٍغ‬ ‫َتذلٍل‬ ‫لٍب‬ ‫المصبدجخ‬ ‫َاِوشطخ‬ ‫الؼمل‬ ‫َأوظمخ‬ ‫المؼذاد‬ ‫َصٍبوخ‬
‫المغتقجل‬ ً‫ف‬ ‫تكشاسٌب‬ ‫لمىغ‬ ‫لٍب‬ ‫تتؼشض‬ ‫قذ‬ ً‫الت‬ ‫الذُادث‬.
Natural Gas vehicles company – Car Gas
‫البيئة‬ ‫وحماية‬ ‫والسالمة‬ ‫الصحة‬ ‫سياسة‬
Health, Safety and Environment Policy
Safety
policy
IE Department
EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT
 Fire detection system
 Automatic fire extinguishing system
 Fire water system( fire pumps & hose reels )
 Foam trailer
 Portable fire extinguishers
 Clinic
 Ambulance
IE Department
IE Department
IE Department
‫المتوقع‬ ‫التموين‬ ‫مراكز‬
‫افتتاحها‬
‫الفترة‬‫المبيعات‬ ‫فى‬ ‫المتوقعة‬ ‫الزيادة‬‫المبيعات‬ ‫الى‬ ‫الزيادة‬ ‫نسبة‬
2009
-‫سويف‬ ‫بنى‬
-‫الفيوم‬
-‫بشر‬ ‫سيدى‬ ‫مركزى‬
-‫القطامية‬
-‫المطريه‬
-‫الدين‬ ‫عز‬
‫عام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األول‬ ‫الربع‬ ‫خالل‬
201042,000‫م‬3‫بواقع‬ ‫يوميا‬
11,5‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3
11,5‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3/163,5
‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3
7%
-‫بالسويس‬ ‫مركز‬
-‫باألسماعيلية‬ ‫مركز‬
‫عام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬ ‫خالل‬
2010
‫كاآلتى‬ ‫بيانتها‬ ‫افتتاحها‬ ‫المتوقع‬ ‫التموين‬ ‫مراكز‬
IE Department
‫خالل‬ ‫افتتاحها‬ ‫المتوقع‬ ‫المحطات‬
‫العام‬
‫التشغيل‬ ‫فترة‬‫اليومية‬ ‫المبيعات‬ ‫متوسط‬
(‫م‬3)
‫المتوقعة‬ ‫السنوية‬ ‫الزيادة‬
(‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3)
‫االسماعيلية‬–‫بهنسى‬ ‫أحمد‬‫العام‬ ‫بداية‬ ‫مع‬10,0003,6
‫القطامية‬–‫مقلد‬ ‫عالء‬‫العام‬ ‫بداية‬ ‫مع‬10000,36
‫التعاون‬–‫السويس‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫الثانى‬ ‫الربع‬10,0002,7
‫المنيا‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫الثالث‬ ‫الربع‬‫التحويل‬ ‫زيادة‬ ‫مع‬0,3
‫األسكندرية‬(‫الهيئة‬ ‫أتوبيسات‬)‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫الثالث‬ ‫الربع‬15,0002,7
‫سوهاج‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬‫التحويل‬ ‫زيادة‬ ‫مع‬0,2
‫المطرية‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬80000,72
‫شبرد‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬80000,72
‫كالتكس‬–‫أكتوبر‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬70000,63
‫المنصورة‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬80000,72
‫عام‬ ‫خالل‬ ‫المتوقعة‬ ‫الزيادة‬ ‫إجمالى‬201112,65
IE Department
 Brinckerhoff, P.C. (1994). Mission-based management: Leading your not-for-
profit into the 21st century. Oak Park, IL: Alpine Guild, Inc.
 Bryson, J.M. (1989). Strategic planning for public and non-profit organizations.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
 Caffarella, R. (1994). Planning programs for adult leaders: A practical guide for
educators, trainers and staff developers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
 Gomaa, A.H., (2011(, “Strategic Planning & Change Management for Engineers”,
Engineering and Science Services - American University in Cairo.
Reference Books:
Relevant Web Sites
• Strategic Quality Plan:
http://www.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/cobudget/pdf/Introduction/StrategicQualPlan01.pdf
• Strategic Quality Planning Through Quality’s Five Dimensions )by Richard Winder(:
http://www.ldri.com/articles/93stratqualplan.html
• University Club of MSU Website: http://www.universityclubofmsu.org
• What is Strategic Planning?: http://www.allianceonline.org/FAQ/strategic_planning
• http://www.ngvc-eg.com/about%20us.html
IE Department

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicals
2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicals2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicals
2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicalseric7676
 
SBC 16 L Kach Dec14
SBC 16 L Kach Dec14SBC 16 L Kach Dec14
SBC 16 L Kach Dec14SB Chauhan
 
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0Matt Trigg
 
Summer training report
Summer training reportSummer training report
Summer training reportMohini Sahu
 
Farrukh_Sohail_Portfolio
Farrukh_Sohail_PortfolioFarrukh_Sohail_Portfolio
Farrukh_Sohail_PortfolioFarrukh Sohail
 
Personnel agl
Personnel aglPersonnel agl
Personnel aglknyp
 
Dai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declines
Dai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declinesDai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declines
Dai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declinesIndiaNotes.com
 
QS Practice & Management
QS Practice & ManagementQS Practice & Management
QS Practice & ManagementScott Gibb
 
How ZI Created a Successful HR Framework
How ZI Created a Successful HR FrameworkHow ZI Created a Successful HR Framework
How ZI Created a Successful HR FrameworkWael Albassam
 
SBC 16+ L Kach May15
SBC 16+ L Kach May15SBC 16+ L Kach May15
SBC 16+ L Kach May15SB Chauhan
 
Strategy of Bharat forge
Strategy of Bharat forge Strategy of Bharat forge
Strategy of Bharat forge Mayank Kumar
 
Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3
Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3
Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3bikshapati
 
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0Matt Trigg
 
Graduates presentation v1
Graduates presentation v1Graduates presentation v1
Graduates presentation v1eric7676
 
A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.
A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.
A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.SHIVAKUMARKAREKYATAN
 
2016 Christopher Hinman Resume
2016 Christopher Hinman Resume2016 Christopher Hinman Resume
2016 Christopher Hinman Resumechris hinman
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicals
2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicals2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicals
2012 bp china campus recruitment petrochemicals
 
SBC 16 L Kach Dec14
SBC 16 L Kach Dec14SBC 16 L Kach Dec14
SBC 16 L Kach Dec14
 
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1_questionbk_v6.0
 
Summer training report
Summer training reportSummer training report
Summer training report
 
Farrukh_Sohail_Portfolio
Farrukh_Sohail_PortfolioFarrukh_Sohail_Portfolio
Farrukh_Sohail_Portfolio
 
Personnel agl
Personnel aglPersonnel agl
Personnel agl
 
Dai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declines
Dai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declinesDai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declines
Dai Ichi Karkaria: Buy at CMP and add on declines
 
QS Practice & Management
QS Practice & ManagementQS Practice & Management
QS Practice & Management
 
Kalyani Bharat Forge
Kalyani Bharat ForgeKalyani Bharat Forge
Kalyani Bharat Forge
 
How ZI Created a Successful HR Framework
How ZI Created a Successful HR FrameworkHow ZI Created a Successful HR Framework
How ZI Created a Successful HR Framework
 
Cvp analysis
Cvp analysisCvp analysis
Cvp analysis
 
SBC 16+ L Kach May15
SBC 16+ L Kach May15SBC 16+ L Kach May15
SBC 16+ L Kach May15
 
DINOOP PRODN.
DINOOP PRODN.DINOOP PRODN.
DINOOP PRODN.
 
Strategy of Bharat forge
Strategy of Bharat forge Strategy of Bharat forge
Strategy of Bharat forge
 
Bhel
BhelBhel
Bhel
 
Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3
Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3
Cd 13-kvsunitha 45-_3
 
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0
En p2 a_prac_2015_samplepaper1&2_scenariobk_v6.0
 
Graduates presentation v1
Graduates presentation v1Graduates presentation v1
Graduates presentation v1
 
A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.
A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.
A study on_employees_perspective_towards training and development.
 
2016 Christopher Hinman Resume
2016 Christopher Hinman Resume2016 Christopher Hinman Resume
2016 Christopher Hinman Resume
 

Destacado

Respect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et Epaules
Respect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et EpaulesRespect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et Epaules
Respect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et EpaulesDominique Gayraud
 
Ecologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalista
Ecologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalistaEcologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalista
Ecologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalistaErnesto Isaac Key Garcia
 
Proyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonio
Proyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonioProyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonio
Proyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonioJorge Romero
 
cara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesia
cara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesiacara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesia
cara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesiaroffi siana
 
Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)
Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)
Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)Muhammad Salman Hakim
 
Conductividad quimica jeysson ramos
Conductividad quimica jeysson ramosConductividad quimica jeysson ramos
Conductividad quimica jeysson ramosjeysson ramos
 
Writing a teel paragraph for beginners
Writing a teel paragraph for beginnersWriting a teel paragraph for beginners
Writing a teel paragraph for beginnersKrysten Andrews
 
P lemus act_4_u4_foro
P lemus act_4_u4_foroP lemus act_4_u4_foro
P lemus act_4_u4_foroEsmeraldaLC
 
.Membangun personal branding
.Membangun personal branding.Membangun personal branding
.Membangun personal brandingAlvian ega
 
Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia
Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia
Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia Alaa Atia
 
Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai +971 4553 8725
Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai  +971 4553 8725Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai  +971 4553 8725
Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai +971 4553 8725Sandeepnextgen
 
Janovian GA RES(3) (1)
Janovian GA RES(3) (1)Janovian GA RES(3) (1)
Janovian GA RES(3) (1)Janovian Frye
 
Lori_Bittle_SME_BIO
Lori_Bittle_SME_BIOLori_Bittle_SME_BIO
Lori_Bittle_SME_BIOLori Bittle
 

Destacado (20)

my cv 1
my cv 1my cv 1
my cv 1
 
Tema 1
Tema 1Tema 1
Tema 1
 
Respect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et Epaules
Respect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et EpaulesRespect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et Epaules
Respect de La Laicite - Les Agents Publics Vont Etre Mieux Formes Et Epaules
 
Mike_Stoever_Slides
Mike_Stoever_SlidesMike_Stoever_Slides
Mike_Stoever_Slides
 
Dennis L Crews
Dennis L CrewsDennis L Crews
Dennis L Crews
 
Ecologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalista
Ecologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalistaEcologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalista
Ecologia, educacion y conciencia ambientalista
 
Proyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonio
Proyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonioProyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonio
Proyecto1 b romerobalderas_jorgeantonio
 
Tema 1 la sociedad del conocimiento
Tema 1 la sociedad del conocimientoTema 1 la sociedad del conocimiento
Tema 1 la sociedad del conocimiento
 
cara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesia
cara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesiacara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesia
cara membuat klepon khas desa Tegalsambi (kintelan) Jepara, Indonesia
 
Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)
Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)
Personal branding (muhammad salman hakim)
 
Conductividad quimica jeysson ramos
Conductividad quimica jeysson ramosConductividad quimica jeysson ramos
Conductividad quimica jeysson ramos
 
Servicio comunitario
Servicio comunitarioServicio comunitario
Servicio comunitario
 
Writing a teel paragraph for beginners
Writing a teel paragraph for beginnersWriting a teel paragraph for beginners
Writing a teel paragraph for beginners
 
P lemus act_4_u4_foro
P lemus act_4_u4_foroP lemus act_4_u4_foro
P lemus act_4_u4_foro
 
.Membangun personal branding
.Membangun personal branding.Membangun personal branding
.Membangun personal branding
 
Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia
Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia
Principles of scaling & root planing dr alaa attia
 
Jessica Swendsen
Jessica SwendsenJessica Swendsen
Jessica Swendsen
 
Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai +971 4553 8725
Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai  +971 4553 8725Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai  +971 4553 8725
Cassia at the fields MBR city Dubai +971 4553 8725
 
Janovian GA RES(3) (1)
Janovian GA RES(3) (1)Janovian GA RES(3) (1)
Janovian GA RES(3) (1)
 
Lori_Bittle_SME_BIO
Lori_Bittle_SME_BIOLori_Bittle_SME_BIO
Lori_Bittle_SME_BIO
 

Similar a Strategic Planning for Egypt's Natural Gas Vehicle Industry

Green Forum 2010 Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)
Green Forum 2010   Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)Green Forum 2010   Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)
Green Forum 2010 Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)Fabio Nicolo
 
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Indian Oil Corporation LimitedIndian Oil Corporation Limited
Indian Oil Corporation LimitedPankaj Dev
 
Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015
Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015
Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015William Killion
 
CFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&A
CFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&ACFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&A
CFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&AAlberto Elli
 
TOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptx
TOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptxTOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptx
TOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptxmuhammadzahid526811
 
Sukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio Presentation
Sukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio PresentationSukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio Presentation
Sukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio PresentationSukumar S Mani
 
Balanced_Scorecard_Project V Final
Balanced_Scorecard_Project V FinalBalanced_Scorecard_Project V Final
Balanced_Scorecard_Project V FinalCarlos Rivero
 
SAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactors
SAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactorsSAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactors
SAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactorsRoberto Carlos Roldán
 
Renault Alliance Perspective
Renault Alliance PerspectiveRenault Alliance Perspective
Renault Alliance PerspectiveKelly Auto Group
 
Strategic management session 1
Strategic management session 1Strategic management session 1
Strategic management session 1Raja Sekharan
 
TEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptx
TEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptxTEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptx
TEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptxSaynurOnen
 
Chandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - UChandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - Uchandrashekar B
 
Chandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - UChandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - Uchandrashekar B
 
Volkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBC
Volkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBCVolkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBC
Volkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBCKhải Tiên
 
Ingi_El-Azizi 2014 - Copy
Ingi_El-Azizi  2014 - CopyIngi_El-Azizi  2014 - Copy
Ingi_El-Azizi 2014 - CopyIngi Elazizi
 
How Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per year
How Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per yearHow Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per year
How Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per yearGlyn Jenks
 

Similar a Strategic Planning for Egypt's Natural Gas Vehicle Industry (20)

Green Forum 2010 Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)
Green Forum 2010   Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)Green Forum 2010   Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)
Green Forum 2010 Tefen Enegy Efficiency Excellence (E3)
 
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Indian Oil Corporation LimitedIndian Oil Corporation Limited
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
 
Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015
Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015
Resume - William Killion - Oct 2015
 
CFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&A
CFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&ACFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&A
CFO Summit XXI-A.Elli M&A
 
TOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptx
TOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptxTOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptx
TOYOTA BALANCE SCORECARD Presentation of the studnent.pptx
 
Sukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio Presentation
Sukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio PresentationSukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio Presentation
Sukumar S Mani - Online Portfolio Presentation
 
Balanced_Scorecard_Project V Final
Balanced_Scorecard_Project V FinalBalanced_Scorecard_Project V Final
Balanced_Scorecard_Project V Final
 
Karthik Mahadevan
Karthik MahadevanKarthik Mahadevan
Karthik Mahadevan
 
TPM: Focused Improvement (Kobetsu Kaizen)
TPM: Focused Improvement (Kobetsu Kaizen)TPM: Focused Improvement (Kobetsu Kaizen)
TPM: Focused Improvement (Kobetsu Kaizen)
 
Competing Value Framework
Competing Value FrameworkCompeting Value Framework
Competing Value Framework
 
SAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactors
SAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactorsSAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactors
SAP awards 2014 solunion cloud category SuccessFactors
 
Renault Alliance Perspective
Renault Alliance PerspectiveRenault Alliance Perspective
Renault Alliance Perspective
 
Strategic management session 1
Strategic management session 1Strategic management session 1
Strategic management session 1
 
TEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptx
TEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptxTEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptx
TEI RECOGNITION SYSTEM_TEI PEOPLE AWARDS_2023_10.04.pptx
 
Begg
BeggBegg
Begg
 
Chandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - UChandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - U
 
Chandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - UChandrashekar_ Resume - U
Chandrashekar_ Resume - U
 
Volkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBC
Volkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBCVolkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBC
Volkswagen Case _ Lâm Tiên Khải _ HSBC
 
Ingi_El-Azizi 2014 - Copy
Ingi_El-Azizi  2014 - CopyIngi_El-Azizi  2014 - Copy
Ingi_El-Azizi 2014 - Copy
 
How Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per year
How Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per yearHow Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per year
How Arrowsmith Engineering saved £300,000 per year
 

Strategic Planning for Egypt's Natural Gas Vehicle Industry

  • 1. IE Department Strategic Planning For Gas Industries In Egypt Under supervision of: Prof.Dr. Attia Gomaa 2013 Case Study: Natural Gas Vehicles Company Presented by : Mohammed Taher
  • 2. IE Department 1. Core Objectives 2. Strategic Planning Overview 3. Feasibility study overview 4. Case Study Overview (Video) 5. Annual Report Analysis 6. Strategic Objectives Analysis 7. Benchmarking Analysis 8. Proposed KPIs Report 9. Proposed Strategic Plan 10. Proposed Feasibility Study 11. Conclusion Contents:
  • 3. IE Department 1- Understand the importance of strategic planning 2- Apply effective strategic planning approach: • To improve the customer satisfaction • To increase the market share • To Increase the profit ratio • To Improve the resource productivity • To Satisfy the Quality & HSE standards Core Objectives:
  • 4. IE Department Now Future Vision, Values & Mission  A systematic Methodology to design the business future. Strategic planning definition STRATEGIC PLANNING
  • 5. IE Department Proposed Strategic Planning Process Analysis (Environmental assessment) Strategies Strategic Objectives Action Plans SWOT Analysis GAP Analysis Mission Reason for existence Vision Future intent Values Attitudes and policies SMART Goals Company Integration Management Feasibility Study
  • 6. IE Department • Why we exist? • what an organization should look like in the future? Vision • How we act? • how an organization should act? Values • How we think? • What is our purpose? Mission STRATEGIC PLANNING
  • 7. IE Department Company Integration Management Financial SkillsProcess Market Total View
  • 8. IE Department SWOT Analysis Analysis (Environmental assessment) SWOT Analysis Mission Reason for existence Vision Future intent Values Attitudes and policies Negative (Harmful)Positive (Beneficial) WeaknessesStrengths Internal ThreatsOpportunities External
  • 9. IE Department Main Strategic Directions Financial SkillsProcess Market Negative (Harmful)Positive (Beneficial) WeaknessesStrengths Internal ThreatsOpportunities External
  • 10. IE Department SWOT Analysis – Integration is key SWOTs need Integrating P
  • 11. IE Department Company Integration Management Financial SkillsProcess Market Strategic Objectives Business Objectives drive the Strategic Action Plan
  • 12. IE Department Company Integration Management Financial SkillsProcess Market KPIs for each Discipline KPI Report for Top Management
  • 14. IE Department CASE STUDY : NATURAL GAS VEHICLES COMPANY
  • 15. IE Department Company Overview Achievements: 57 stations 23 conversion centers 57 compressor units 304 refueling points running in all Egypt, a wide range of Compressor natural gas (CNG) THE PURPOSE OF THE COMPANY Manufacturing , installation ,design and maintenance of natural gas in its various operating systems for vehicles. Design , construction , operation , maintenance , management and ownership of gas centers and systems Video Car gas company achieve government plans to minimize petroleum support
  • 17. IE Department  Mission: Commercializing vehicular natural gas as the best alternative fuel for vehicles within the Arab Republic of Egypt and worldwide.  Vision: Build market leadership and distinctiveness to break away from competition and to become the undisputed leader in global vehicular natural gas industry  Core Values Change culture safety awareness (within the processes an toward clients) Team work Customer satisfaction sustainability Quality of process Efficiency
  • 18. IE Department Comments 1-Vision: where the organization wants to go in the future ? - Not future intent 2-Mission :how we think?? Not sufficient reasons for existence 3-Not clear and sample. 4-Not focused and objective.
  • 19. IE Department ‫المنتدب‬ ‫العضو‬‫و‬ ‫ة‬‫االدار‬ ‫مجمس‬ ‫رئيس‬ ‫خجٍـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــش‬ ‫تكميــف‬ ‫بأعمال‬ ‫قائم‬ ‫منتـــدب‬ ‫المىتــــــــــــــــذة‬ ُ‫الؼض‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫مجلظ‬ ‫لشئُن‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫لّمــــــــــــــــــــــــــه‬ ‫مغبػذ‬ ‫الششكخ‬ ‫سئٍظ‬ ‫الجشـــــشٌخ‬ ‫للمُاسد‬ ‫مغبػذ‬ ‫الششكخ‬ ‫سئٍظ‬ ‫التجبسٌــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫َاالقتصبدٌخ‬ ‫الفىٍخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫للؼملٍـــــــــــــــــــبد‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫المبلٍـــــــــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫المذوٍخ‬ ‫للمشــشَػبد‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫الذاخلٍــــــــخ‬ ‫للمشاجؼخ‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫الجشــــــشٌخ‬ ‫للمُاسد‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫التجبسٌــــــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫َالذػبٌخ‬ ‫التغٌُق‬ ‫لجذُث‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫للمٍمـــــــــــــــــــبد‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫للضٌـــــــــــــــــــــُد‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫للىقـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــل‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫المٍىٍخ‬ ‫َالصذخ‬ ‫للغالمخ‬ ‫الجٍئخ‬ ‫َدمبٌخ‬ ‫المغبػذح‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫المؼلُمبد‬ ‫لتكىُلُجٍب‬ ‫َاالتصبالد‬ ‫الؼبمخ‬ ‫االداسح‬ ‫االقبوُوٍــــــخ‬ ‫للشئُن‬ Organization structure
  • 20. IE Department Proposed Financial Indicators 1) Profit Ratio 2) Revenue 3) Total Cost 4) Inventory Turnover 5) Value Added 6) Assets Turnover 7) CAPEX
  • 21. IE Department  Profit ratio = Net profit / Revenue  Total cost = revenue – profit  Revenue = Total cost + Profit  Value added ratio =(revenue- external cost )/external cost  Inventory turnover = Sales Cost / Average inventory cost  Assets turnover = Revenue / assets (CAPEX)
  • 22. IE Department Profit ratio conversion net profit revenue Refuelling net profit revenue lubrication net profit revenue Profit ratio
  • 24. IE Department revenue conversion total cost profit refueling total cost profit lubrication total cost profit Revenue
  • 25. IE Department Inventory turnover Income Annual inventory cost Inventory turnover
  • 27. IE Department Assets turnover Revenue Assets (capex) Assets turnover
  • 28. IE Department CAPEX Fixed assets project under Implementation Investments in bonds CAPEX
  • 29. IE Department Current situation Analysis: RespondCurrent 2010Actual 2009unitItem conversion0.5770.51---Profit ratio 57.7251% refueling0.2770.242--- 27.7924.2% Lubrication0.941.32--- 94132% conversion39,799,94135,247,714L.ERevenue refuelings82,649,15874,152,628L.E lubrication24,224,78313,614,716L.E All activities173,758,960144,849,764L.ETotal rev.
  • 30. IE Department conversion24,997,22023,232,329L.ETotal cost refueling33,212,14629,647,281L.E lubrication16,654,74610,019,521L.E All activities145,603,289117,529,116L.E All activities70,739,17754,629,986L.ERunning cost All activities356,45297.16%Inventory turnover All activities85,269,27076,209,414L.EValue added All activities113.494.8%Assets turnover All activities153,224,223152,755,621L.ECapex Current situation Analysis:
  • 31. IE Department Current situation Analysis: varianceResponActual 2010Actual 2009UnitItem 13.17conversion57.7251%Profit ratio 14.83Refueling27.7924.2 -28.79Lubrication94132 27.57conversion39,799,94135,247,714%revenue 24.19Refueling82,649,15874,152,628% 216.5lubrication24,224,78313,614,716L.E 19.95All companies356.45297.16L.EInventory turnover
  • 32. IE Department 25.19All companies85,269,27076,209,414L.EValue added 19.62All companies113.494.8%Assets turnover 70All companies153,224,2231,527,556L.ECapex 15.71conversion107.592.9%Total cost 25.56Refueling11289.2 176.5lubrication166.260.1 Current situation Analysis:
  • 33. IE Department Benchmarking Analysis External company Italian company (landirenzo) Internal benchmarking (car gas company in 2007)
  • 34. IE Department Performancelevel Time line Current situation World class (landyrinzo) The competition What's the Gap? 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  • 35. IE Department Strategic objective: External benchmark Internal benchmark Current 2010 Actual 2009 unitItem 9065577251%Profit ratio 704027.7924.2 18015094132 180150112.988.5%revenue 200150111.489.7 280200177.956.20 7080107.592.9%Total cost 758011289.2 8075166.260.1
  • 37. IE Department Performancelevel Time line 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Target Current
  • 39. IE Department Goals & Target: responsGoal 2014 Goal 2013 Goal 2012 Target 2011 Current 2010 UnitItem conversion908575657.72%Profit ratio refueling7060504027.79 Lubrication18017016015054 Conversion200180170150112.9%Revenue Refueling200180170150111.4 Lubrication280260230200177.9 Conversion50607080107.5%Total cost Refueling50607080112 Lubrication40506075166.2
  • 41. IE Department  Financial KPI: Strength points • Revenue (24.19%) • Value added (25.19%) • CAPEX ratio (70%) • Inventory turnover (19.9%) Weakness points • Total cost (15.7%) • Profitability (-28.7%) • Assets turnover (19.6%)
  • 43. IE Department Market Indicators : 1. Market Share 2. Number Of Customers 3. Claim Ratio 4. Market Value Added 5. Competition Ratio 6. Customer Satisfaction Level 7. Sales Quantity 8. Market Quantity
  • 44. IE Department Market share A percentage of total sales volume in a market captured by a brand, product, or company. Market share =sales quantity/overall market quantity
  • 45. IE Department market share cionversion sales Q no. of cars per month market Q total no. of cars per month re-fuelling sales Q sales of gas per month market Q total sales of gas per month Market share
  • 46. IE Department Indicator 2009 2010 Sales quantity 360 * 12 = 4320 car/year 813*12=9756 car/year Market quantity 986 * 12 = 11832 cars/year 1621*12=19452 cars/year Market share 4320 / 11832 = 36.5 % 50.1 % Conversion:
  • 47. IE Department Re-fuelling: Indicator 2009 2010 Sales quantity 12.3*12 = 147.6 M m2/year 16.4 * 12 = 196.8 M m2/year Market quantity 31 * 12 = 372 M m2/year 39 * 12 = 468 M m2/year Market share 147.6/372 = 39.9% 196.8/468=42%
  • 48. IE Department Number of customers The total number of cars which were converted and amount of gas sold within the company since the beginning of the activity
  • 49. IE Department number of customers conversion total customers for conersioning into gas re-fuelling total number of customers to re-fuelling Number of customers
  • 50. IE Department Indicator 2009 2010 Conversion number of customers 45508 cars 62433 cars Re-fuelling number of customers 103,229 cars 145565 Number of customers
  • 51. IE Department Sales quantity The amount of million meter of gas sold annually The amount of cars which were converted annually
  • 52. IE Department sales quantity conversion number of cars per month re-fuelling number of million meter of gas Sales quantity
  • 53. IE Department Indicator 2009 2010 Conversion sales quantity 360*12 = 4320 cars 813*12= 9756 cars Re-fuelling sales quantity 12.3 * 12 = 147.6 Mm3 16.4*12= 196.8 Mm3 Sales quantity
  • 54. IE Department Market quantity Is defined as the amount of cars or meter of gas consumption during the month corresponding to the overall market consumption
  • 55. IE Department market quantity conversion number of cars per month/overall re-fuelling total sales of gas Market quantity
  • 56. IE Department Indicator 2009 2010 Conversion market quantity 986*12 = 11,832 cars 1621*12 = 19,452 cars Re-fuelling market quantity 31*12 = 372 Mm3 39*12 = 468 Mm3 Market quantity
  • 57. IE Department Customer satisfaction ratio The degree of satisfaction provided by the goods or services of a company as measured by the number of repeat customers Customer satisfaction ratio = (total no of cars- total no of rejected)/total no of cars
  • 59. IE Department Indicator calculations 2009 2010 Customer satisfaction ratio = 97% = 99.4 Customer satisfaction ratio
  • 60. IE Department Competition ratio Is the ratio of the company’s sales quantity to the others competitors sales quantity
  • 61. IE Department competition ratio conversion number of cars converted from the beginning at Car gas total number of cars number of stations ( fuelling) number of Cargas stations total number of stations Competition ratio
  • 62. IE Department Indicator calculations 2009 2010 Conversion competition ratio 45508/103229 = 44 % 62433/145565 = 42% Re-fuelling competition ratio 52/119 = 43% 57/137 = 41% Competition ratio
  • 63. IE Department Claims ratio The ratio of the cost of claims to the corresponding premiums, either gross or net of reinsurance Claims ratio=no of rejected cars/total no of cars
  • 64. IE Department claims ratio conversion total number of claims number of cars per year Claims ratio
  • 65. IE Department Indicator 2009 2010 Claims rate 3 9 Number of rejected cars 129 878 Total number of cars 4320 9756 Claims ratio 2 % 8% Claims ratio
  • 66. IE Department Current Situation Analysis Conversion: Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility Market share % 36.5 50.1 Market Dept. Number of customers Cars 45508 62433 Market Dept. Claim ratio % 2 8 Market Dept. Competition ratio % 44 42 Market Dept. Customer satisfaction Cars 4214 9703 Market Dept. Sales quantity Cars 4320 9756 Market Dept. Market quantity Cars 11832 19452 Market Dept.
  • 67. IE Department Re-fuelling: Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility Market share % 39.9 42 Market Dept. Number of customers cars 103229 145565 Market Dept. Claim ratio % 41.4 58% Market Dept. Competition ratio % 43 41 Market Dept. Sales quantity Cars 147.6 (42.8 %) 196.8 (57.4 %) Market Dept. Market quantity cars 372 (44.2 %) 468 (55.7 % ) Market Dept.
  • 68. IE Department Current Situation Analysis Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility Variance % Market share % 36.5 50.1 Market Dept. 37.2 Cumulative # of customers cars 45508 (over 15 y) 62433 (over 16 y) Market Dept. 37.19 Claim ratio % 2 8 Market Dept. 300 Competition ratio % 44 42 Market Dept. 4.54 Customer satisfaction Cars % 4214 ( 98 %) 9703 ( 92 %) Market Dept. 130.2 Sales quantity Cars 4320 9756 Market Dept. 125 Market quantity cars 11832 19452 Market Dept. 64.4 Conversion:
  • 69. IE Department Re-fuelling: Item Unit 2009 2010 Responsibility Variance Market share % 39.9 42 Market Dept. 5.26 Number of customers cars 103229 145565 Market Dept. 41.01 Claim ratio % 41.4 58% Market Dept. Competition ratio % 43 41 Market Dept. -4.65 Sales quantity Cars 147.6 (42.8 %) 196.8 (57.4 %) Market Dept. 33 Market quantity cars 372 (44.2 %) 468 (55.7 % ) Market Dept. 25.8
  • 70. IE Department Benchmarking Analysis External company (landirenzo) Internal benchmarking (car gas company in 2007)
  • 71. IE Department Performancelevel Time line Current situation World class (landirenzo) The competition What's the cap? 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  • 72. IE Department Strategic objectives Item Unit 2009 2010 Internal benchmark External benchmark Market share % 36.5 50.1 65 75 Number of customers cars 45508 (42 %) 62433 (57 % ) 65 % 80 % Claim ratio % 2 8 5 1 Competition ratio % 44 42 50 80 Customer satisfaction Cars 4214 (30%) 9703 (69%) 75 % 90 % Sales quantity Cars 4320 (30.6 %) 9756 (69.3%) 75 % 90 % Market quantity cars 11832 (37.8 % ) 19452 ( 62.1 %) 75 % 85 % Conversion:
  • 73. IE Department Re-fuelling : Item Unit 2009 2010 Internal benchmark External Benchmark Market share % 39.9 42 50 70 Number of customers cars 103229 (41.4 %) 145565 (58.5 %) 60 % 85% Claim ratio % 41.4 58% --- --- Competition ratio % 43 41 50 70 Sales quantity Cars 147.6 (42.8 %) 196.8 (57.4 %) 60 % 85 % Market quantity cars 372 (44.2 %) 468 (55.7 % ) 65 % 85 %
  • 74. IE Department Performancelevel Time line 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 target current
  • 76. IE Department Goals and Targets Conversion: Item Unit 2009 (current) 2010 (target) 2011 (goal) 2012 (goal) 2013 (goal) Market share % 36.5 50.1 65 70 75 Number of customers % 42 57 65 75 80 Claims ratio % 2 8 5 3 1 Competition ratio % 44 42 50 65 80 Customer satisfaction % 30 69 75 80 90 Sales quantity % 30.6 69.3 75 80 90 Market quantity % 37.8 62.1 70 80 85
  • 77. IE Department Re-fuelling: Item Unit 2009 (current) 2010 (target) 2011 (goal) 2012 (goal) 2013 (goal) Market share % 39.9 42 50 60 70 Number of customers % 41.4 58.5 60 70 85 Competition ratio % 43 41 50 60 70 Sales quantity % 42.8 57.1 60 75 85 Market quantity % 44.2 55.7 65 75 85
  • 78. IE Department Market kPI: Strength point • Market share (37.2%) • Number of customers (37.19%) • Customer satisfaction (130.2%) • Sales quantity (125%) • Market quantity (64.4%) Weakness point • Claim ratio (300%) • Competition ratio (4.5% )
  • 80. IE Department Skill’s Indicators: 1. Attendance 2. Labor productivity 3. Employee turnover 4. Injury rate 5. Illness rate 6. Quality of training
  • 81. IE Department Attendance Attendance is the act of attending work. The attendance rate tells you the average percentage of employee attending the company each day in the given year Attendance % = (total no of employee –Absent )/total no of employee
  • 82. IE Department Attendance total number of Employee Absent Attendance
  • 83. IE Department Attendance 2009 = 90 % Attendance 2010 = 70 % Attendance
  • 84. IE Department Labor productivity Rate of output per worker (or a group of workers) per unit of time as compared with an established standard or expected rate of output. Labor productivity = total quantity / man-hr
  • 85. IE Department Labor productivity Conversion total number of cars man hour " working hours" Re-fuelling total quantity sold working hours Labor productivity
  • 86. IE Department Indicator Unit 2009 2010 Conversion Car/Man-Day = 2 = 4 Re-Fuelling Mm3 /Man-Day = 0.02 = 0.026 Labor productivity
  • 87. IE Department Employee turnover The ratio of the number of employees that leave a company through attrition, dismissal, or resignation during a period to the number of employees on payroll during the same period.
  • 88. IE Department Employee turnover for 2009  1% Employee turnover for 2010  0.9% Employee turnover
  • 89. IE Department Injury rate Injury rate number of Injured employee The number of injuries which happens to the workers during working within the stations
  • 90. IE Department Injury Rate  2009 = 0.25% Injury Rate  2010 = 0.23% Injury rate
  • 91. IE Department Illness rate The illness rate is calculated by comparing employee illness-related absences against planned working time, within a specific period Illness rate = No of illed employee/total no of employee
  • 93. IE Department Indicator 2009 2010 Illness rate 400/1457 = 0.27 = 27% 475/1457 = 0.32 = 32.6 % Illness rate
  • 94. IE Department Quality Of Training Number of Trainee Quality Of Training Is defined as the ratio between the planned courses attenders to the actual workers who attended those course
  • 95. IE Department Indicator Unit 2009 2010 Actual Training Courses Attendees Employee/Year 193 295 Planes Training Courses Attendees Employee/Year 700 700 Quality Of Training
  • 96. IE Department Current Situation Analysis Item Unit Actual (2009) Current (2010) Responsibility Comment Attendance % 90 70 HR Labor Productivity Car/Man-Day 2 4 Conversion Mm3/Man-Day 0.02 0.026 Re-Fuelling Employee Turnover % 1 0.9 HR Injury Rate % 0.25 0.23 HR Illness Rate % 27 32.6 HR Actual Quality Rate Employee/Day 193 295 HR Planned Quality Rate Employee/Day 700 700 HR
  • 97. IE Department Current Situation Analysis: Item Unit Actual (2009) Current (2010) Responsibility Variance % Comment Attendance % 90 70 HR -22.2 Labor Productivity Car/Man- Day 2 4 Conversion 100 Mm3/Man -Day 0.02 0.026 Re-Fuelling 30 Employee Turnover % 1 0.9 HR -10 Injury Rate % 0.25 0.23 HR -8 Illness Rate % 27 32.6 HR 20.7 Actual Quality Rate Employee /Day 193 295 HR 52.8 Planned Quality Rate Employee /Day 700 700 HR ---
  • 98. IE Department Benchmarking Analysis External company (landirenzo) Internal benchmarking (car gas company in 2007)
  • 99. IE Department Performancelevel Time line Current situation World class (landyrinzo) The competition What's the cap? 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  • 100. IE Department Strategic objectives Item Unit Actual (2009) Current (2010) Internal Benchmark External Benchmark Attendance % 90 70 95 100 Labor Productivity Car/Man-Day 2 4 6 10 Mm3/Man-Day 0.02 0.026 0.027 0.03 Employee Turnover % 1 0.9 2 10 Injury Rate % 0.25 0.23 0.2 0.01 Illness Rate % 27 32.6 20 10 Actual Quality Rate Employee/Day 193 295 70 95
  • 101. IE Department Performancelevel Time line 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 target current
  • 103. IE Department Goals and targets Item Unit Current (2010) Target (2011) Goal (2012) Goal (2013) Goal (2014) Attendance % 70 95 96 97 100 Labor Productivity Car/Man- Day 4 6 7 8 10 Mm3/Man- Day 0.026 0.027 0.026 0.028 0.03 Employee Turnover % 0.9 2 5 7 10 Injury Rate % 0.23 0.2 0.1 0.09 0.01 Illness Rate % 32.6 20 15 12 10 Actual Quality Rate Employee/D ay 295 70 80 90 95
  • 104. IE Department Skills kPI : Strength point • Labor productivity (100%) • Quality rate (52.8%) • Illness rate (20.7%) Weakness point • Attendance (-22.2%) • Employee turnover (-10%) • Injury rate (-8%)
  • 106. IE Department Process Indicators: 1. Performance rate. 2. Quality rate 3. Process utilization 4. Defect ratio 5. Maximum operation hours 6. Process consumption 7. Number of activities 8. Capacity
  • 107. IE Department Performance rate = total quantity/working hours Performance rate The job related activities expected of a worker and how well those activities were executed. Many business personnel directors assess the employee performance of each staff member on an annual or quarterly basis in order to help them identify suggested areas for improvement.
  • 108. IE Department Performance rate Conversion Total no. of converted working hrs. Sales of gas. Total quantity of gas Working hrs Performance rate
  • 109. IE Department Quality rate = Accepted Quantity/Total quantity Measures of good or service characteristics based on customer specifications and expectations, and which are essential elements in achieving customer satisfaction. Quality rate
  • 110. IE Department Quality rate Conversion Accepted conversion cars Total converted cars Sales of gas Accepted gas sales Total quantity of saling gas Quality rate
  • 111. IE Department Defect ratio = Total quantity – Accepted quantity Defect ratio A defect rate shows how many errors in production occur on average
  • 112. IE Department Defect ratio Total quantity Conversion Sales of gas Accepted quantity Conversion Sales of gas Defect ratio
  • 113. IE Department Max. Operation hrs = Time of converting 1 car * total no. of car/years Max. Operation hrs = time of filling 1 car*total no. of cars /years Maximum operation hours The maximum allowable hours which the worker operates at during the whole year
  • 114. IE Department Maximum operation hours Max. operation hrs. Conversion Time of converting 1 car Total no. of cars/year Sales of gas Time of filling 1 car Total no. of cars/year
  • 115. IE Department No. of activities = Sales Quantity /years No. of activities =No of converted cars /years Number of activities Its defined For the conversion process to be the number of converted cars that the operated done annualy And for the re-fuelling activity it can be defined as the actual sold quantity of gas during the year
  • 116. IE Department No. of Activities Conversion Sales of cars Number of activities
  • 117. IE Department Capacity = Actual capacity/planned capacity Capacity Highest sustainable output rate (maximum number of units per month, quarter, or year) that can be achieved with current resources, maintenance strategies, product specifications
  • 119. IE Department Current situation Analysis: VarianceResponsibility20102009UnitItem 100process1200600Car/yearPerformance rate 12process76.968.64%Quality rate 100process104 (66%)52 (33%)Car-yearDetect ratio 126process39024 (69.3%) 17280 (30.6%) Hr-yearMax. operation hrs 38.7process9756 (69.3%) 4320 (30.6%) Car/yearNo. of activities 49.1%process88%59%%Capacity ratio Conversion:
  • 120. IE Department Sales of gas Variance % Responsibility20102009UnitItem 31.7process0.0270.0205Mm3 /yearPerformance rate 1.02process9998%Quality rate -39.5%process120,000 (37.5%) 200,000 (62%) Mm3/gasDetect ratio 37.2%process5202 (57.8%) 3792.3 (42.1%) Hrs-yearMax. operation hrs 34%process16.41 (57%) 12.3 (42.6%) M-m3Fuel consumption -24.4%process147.6 (43%) 19506 (56.9%) Mm3/yearNo. of activities 4%process104%100%%Capacity ratio
  • 121. IE Department Strategic objective Conversion: External benchmark Internal benchmark 20102009UnitItem 250015001200600Car/yearPerformance rate 957567.968.64%Quality rate 80%70%66%33%%Detect ratio 87%75%69.3%30.6%%Max. operation hrs 85%74%69.3%30%%No. of activities 96%90%88%59%%Capacity ratio
  • 122. IE Department Sales of gas: External benchmark Internal benchmark 20102009UnitItem 500000003500000273333320500Mm3 /yearPerformance rate 10099.59998%Quality rate 10%30%37.5%62%%Defect ratio 77%65%57.8%42.1%%Max. operation hrs 76%64%57%42.6%%Fuel consumption 80%65%43%56.9%%No. of activities 130%115%104100%Capacity ratio
  • 123. IE Department Goals and target Conversion 20142013201220112010Item 25002300190015001200Performance rate 9586807567.9Quality rate 5%10%20%33%66%Defect ratio 87%80%77%75%69.3%Max. operation hrs 85%80%75%74%69.3%No. of activities 96%95%92%90%88%Capacity ratio
  • 124. IE Department Sales of gas 20142013201220112010Item 5000000046000000400000035000002733333Performance rate 10099.999.799.599Quality rate 10%20%25%30%37.5%Detect ratio 77%70%68%65%57.8%Max. operation hrs 80%75%70%65%43%No. of activities 76%74%68%64%57%Fuel consumption 130%125%120%115%104%Capacity ratio
  • 125. IE Department KPI process : Strength points • Defect ratio (-39.5%) • Max. operation hours (37%) • Capacity ratio (4%) Weakness point • No. of activities (-24.4%) sales of gas
  • 126. IE Department Strength points • 1)Max. operation (126%) • 2)No. of activities (38.7%) • 3)Capacity ratio (49.1%) Weakness points • Detect ratio (33%) conversion KPI process :
  • 127. IE Department KPI Report Strength points: Revenue (24.19%) Value added (25.9%) CAPEX ratio (70%) Inventory turnover (19.9%) Market share (37.2%) Customer satisfaction (130.2%) Sales quantity (125%) Labor productivity (100%) Market Quantity (64.4%) Capacity ratio (4.5%)
  • 128. IE Department Weakness points Total cost (15.7%) Profitability (-28.7%) Assets turnover (19.5%) Claim ratio (300%) Competition ratio (4.5%) Attendance (-22.2%) Employee turnover (-10%) Injury rate (-8%) Defect ratio (-39.5%) No. of activities (-24.4%) KPI Report
  • 129. IE Department Threats New technology for design New technology for stations New technology for services More competition External factors KPI Report
  • 130. IE Department opportunities Change in petroleum prices New markets Online markets Development of Information system Development in gas technology KPI Report
  • 131. IE Department Recommendations : Change in management culture Change in customer culture Market motivation Training plan Improvement Increase the station gas Development of manufacturing the cylinders gas KPI Report
  • 132. IE Department Action strategic plan Main Objective Main Items Budget Duration Start Finish Responsible Increase the station gas 4 New Stations: 1.Matrya 2.Aaz eldin 3.Elatamia 4.New cairo 11000000 3 years 1/1/ 2012 1/1/ 2015 Process department Training Improve ment New Courses: Process Safety Quality Market 100000 2 years 15/5/ 2012 15/5/ 2014 HR department
  • 133. IE Department Feasibility study For Example: Matrya station in car gas company
  • 136. IE Department Item Unit Year #1 Year #2 Year #3 …. Year #n Market Information: Investment Information: Technical Information: Cost Elements Information: Others Information: Bank interest rate= i % MARR = I % Project duration= n years Case Study: Feasibility Study for
  • 137. IE Department • Technical study (daily working hours, daily production, machine utilization, , space layout, etc) • Economical study (unit cost, unit price, profit %, CAPEX %, OPEX %, Value added %, Margin factor %, etc) • Financial study (salvage value, cash flow, payback period, NPV,, IRR, etc) • Environmental & Safety study (safety policy, safety tools & equipment, etc) • Management Study (vision, values, mission, organization structure, KPI report, etc).
  • 138. IE Department Technical study Daily working hours Daily production Machine utilization Quality policy Space layout
  • 140. IE Department Economical study Unit cost Unit price Profit (%) Capex(%) Opex(%) Value added(%) Margin factor
  • 142. IE Department Financial study Deprecation Salvage value Cash flow Payback period Net present value Internal rate of return
  • 147. IE Department Environmental study Safety policy Safety tool Safety equipment
  • 148. IE Department Car Gas H.S.E. Policy is based on managing and conducting its activities in a way that : ‫إداسح‬ ‫ػلى‬ ‫الجٍئخ‬ ‫َدمبٌخ‬ ‫َالغالمخ‬ ‫للصذخ‬ ‫جبط‬ ‫كبس‬ ‫عٍبعخ‬ ‫تؼتمذ‬ ‫ػلى‬ ‫ٌؤكذ‬ ‫الزي‬ ُ‫الىذ‬ ‫ػلى‬ ‫أوشطتٍب‬ ‫َمجبششح‬: -Safety is the responsibility of every member of the company. -‫الششكخ‬ ً‫ف‬ ُ‫ػض‬ ‫كل‬ ‫مغئُلٍخ‬ ‫الغالمخ‬ ‫أن‬. -Positively act to protect the health and safety of its personnel, and others who may be affected by these activities, and take the necessary precautions to prevent adverse effects on the physical environment in which its activities are conducted within the law and in compliance with relevant regulations. -‫َلُخشٌه‬ ‫لؼبملٍٍب‬ ‫الغالمخ‬ ‫َتُفٍش‬ ‫الجٍئخ‬ ‫دمبٌخ‬ ‫ػلى‬ ً‫إٌجبث‬ ‫ثشكل‬ ‫الؼمل‬ ‫لمىغ‬ ‫الالصمخ‬ ‫الُقبئٍخ‬ ‫التذاثٍش‬ ‫كبفخ‬ ‫اتخبر‬ ‫مغ‬ ‫اِوشطخ‬ ‫ثٍزي‬ ‫ٌتأثشَا‬ ‫قذ‬ ‫الزٌه‬ ً‫ب‬‫طجق‬ ‫أوشطتٍب‬ ‫مجبششح‬ ‫الششكخ‬ ‫فٍٍب‬ ‫تتُلى‬ ً‫الت‬ ‫للجٍئخ‬ ‫مىبَئخ‬ ‫تأثٍشاد‬ ‫أي‬ ً‫ل‬ ‫المكملخ‬ ‫َاللُائخ‬ ‫القبوُن‬ ‫ِدكبم‬. -No part of its business objectives can be carried out effectively and successfully if not performed safely. -‫ػه‬ ‫إال‬ ‫َوجبح‬ ‫ثفبػلٍخ‬ ‫ٌتذقق‬ ‫ال‬ ‫الششكخ‬ ‫أٌذاف‬ ‫مه‬ ‫جضء‬ ‫أي‬ ‫تىفٍز‬ ‫أن‬ ‫اَمه‬ ‫اِداء‬ ‫الغالمخ‬ ‫إتجبع‬ ‫طشٌق‬. -It is an essential duty of line managers and supervisors to promote the health and safety of all personnel and to ensure the integration of this policy into all stages of operation, maintenance of equipment, systems of work, associated activities and the analysis of all accident in order to prevent its recurrence in future. -‫َعالمخ‬ ‫ثصذخ‬ ‫االستقبء‬ ٌُ ‫َالمششفٍه‬ ‫للمذٌشٌه‬ ً‫اِعبع‬ ‫الُاجت‬ ‫أن‬ ‫التشغٍل‬ ‫مشادل‬ ‫جمٍغ‬ ‫داخل‬ ‫الغٍبعخ‬ ‫ٌزي‬ ‫اوذمبج‬ ‫َتأكٍذ‬ ‫الؼبملٍه‬ ‫جمٍغ‬ ‫جمٍغ‬ ‫َتذلٍل‬ ‫لٍب‬ ‫المصبدجخ‬ ‫َاِوشطخ‬ ‫الؼمل‬ ‫َأوظمخ‬ ‫المؼذاد‬ ‫َصٍبوخ‬ ‫المغتقجل‬ ً‫ف‬ ‫تكشاسٌب‬ ‫لمىغ‬ ‫لٍب‬ ‫تتؼشض‬ ‫قذ‬ ً‫الت‬ ‫الذُادث‬. Natural Gas vehicles company – Car Gas ‫البيئة‬ ‫وحماية‬ ‫والسالمة‬ ‫الصحة‬ ‫سياسة‬ Health, Safety and Environment Policy Safety policy
  • 149. IE Department EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT  Fire detection system  Automatic fire extinguishing system  Fire water system( fire pumps & hose reels )  Foam trailer  Portable fire extinguishers  Clinic  Ambulance
  • 152. IE Department ‫المتوقع‬ ‫التموين‬ ‫مراكز‬ ‫افتتاحها‬ ‫الفترة‬‫المبيعات‬ ‫فى‬ ‫المتوقعة‬ ‫الزيادة‬‫المبيعات‬ ‫الى‬ ‫الزيادة‬ ‫نسبة‬ 2009 -‫سويف‬ ‫بنى‬ -‫الفيوم‬ -‫بشر‬ ‫سيدى‬ ‫مركزى‬ -‫القطامية‬ -‫المطريه‬ -‫الدين‬ ‫عز‬ ‫عام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األول‬ ‫الربع‬ ‫خالل‬ 201042,000‫م‬3‫بواقع‬ ‫يوميا‬ 11,5‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3 11,5‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3/163,5 ‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3 7% -‫بالسويس‬ ‫مركز‬ -‫باألسماعيلية‬ ‫مركز‬ ‫عام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬ ‫خالل‬ 2010 ‫كاآلتى‬ ‫بيانتها‬ ‫افتتاحها‬ ‫المتوقع‬ ‫التموين‬ ‫مراكز‬
  • 153. IE Department ‫خالل‬ ‫افتتاحها‬ ‫المتوقع‬ ‫المحطات‬ ‫العام‬ ‫التشغيل‬ ‫فترة‬‫اليومية‬ ‫المبيعات‬ ‫متوسط‬ (‫م‬3) ‫المتوقعة‬ ‫السنوية‬ ‫الزيادة‬ (‫م‬ ‫مليون‬3) ‫االسماعيلية‬–‫بهنسى‬ ‫أحمد‬‫العام‬ ‫بداية‬ ‫مع‬10,0003,6 ‫القطامية‬–‫مقلد‬ ‫عالء‬‫العام‬ ‫بداية‬ ‫مع‬10000,36 ‫التعاون‬–‫السويس‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫الثانى‬ ‫الربع‬10,0002,7 ‫المنيا‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫الثالث‬ ‫الربع‬‫التحويل‬ ‫زيادة‬ ‫مع‬0,3 ‫األسكندرية‬(‫الهيئة‬ ‫أتوبيسات‬)‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫الثالث‬ ‫الربع‬15,0002,7 ‫سوهاج‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬‫التحويل‬ ‫زيادة‬ ‫مع‬0,2 ‫المطرية‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬80000,72 ‫شبرد‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬80000,72 ‫كالتكس‬–‫أكتوبر‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬70000,63 ‫المنصورة‬‫العام‬ ‫من‬ ‫األخير‬ ‫الربع‬80000,72 ‫عام‬ ‫خالل‬ ‫المتوقعة‬ ‫الزيادة‬ ‫إجمالى‬201112,65
  • 154. IE Department  Brinckerhoff, P.C. (1994). Mission-based management: Leading your not-for- profit into the 21st century. Oak Park, IL: Alpine Guild, Inc.  Bryson, J.M. (1989). Strategic planning for public and non-profit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.  Caffarella, R. (1994). Planning programs for adult leaders: A practical guide for educators, trainers and staff developers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.  Gomaa, A.H., (2011(, “Strategic Planning & Change Management for Engineers”, Engineering and Science Services - American University in Cairo. Reference Books: Relevant Web Sites • Strategic Quality Plan: http://www.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/cobudget/pdf/Introduction/StrategicQualPlan01.pdf • Strategic Quality Planning Through Quality’s Five Dimensions )by Richard Winder(: http://www.ldri.com/articles/93stratqualplan.html • University Club of MSU Website: http://www.universityclubofmsu.org • What is Strategic Planning?: http://www.allianceonline.org/FAQ/strategic_planning • http://www.ngvc-eg.com/about%20us.html