Com es construeix un sistema educatiu nacional? Una visió comparativa internacional sobre el paper de l'educació en els processos de construcció nacional
1. Com es construeix un sistema
educatiu nacional?
COM ES CONSTRUEIX UN SISTEMA
EDUCATIU NACIONAL?
Una visió comparativa internacional sobre
el paper de l'educació en els processos de
construcció nacional
Una visió comparativa internacional sobre el paper
de l'educació en els processos de construcció
nacional
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. L’agenda de Lisboa
– Escolaritzar a almenys el 95% dels alumnes amb edats
compreses entre els 4 anys d'edat i l'inici de
l'escolaritat obligatòria.
– La taxa d'abandonament escolar ha de reduir-se fins a
menys del 10%.
– El percentatge d'alumnes de 15 anys d'edat amb
resultades pobres en lectura, matemàtiques i ciències
ha de ser inferior al 15%.
– Un mínim del 40% de la població d'entre 30 i 34 anys
d'edat ha de comptar amb estudis superiors.
– Un mínim del 15% de la població adulta ha de prendre
part en activitats d'educació permanent.
9. Eines
Estàndards
Processos
Curricula
Selecció
Persones
Tecnologia
Avaluacions
Docents
Preparació
Pràctiques
Personal suport
Sistemes de dades
Ensenyament
Contractació/inducció
Disseny, implementació i
Aprenentatge
Famílies
Intervencions
estudiants
aliniament de les polítiques
Organització treball
Sistemes de suport
Desenvolupament carrera
Supervisió
Retenció
10.
11.
12. Educació 2050
L’antic sistema burocràtic Inclusió El sistema modern
Alguns estudiants aprenen molt Tots els estudiants aprenen al màxim
Curriculum, aprenentatge
Rutines cognitives bàsiques Aprendre a aprendre, noves formes de treball
Qualitat docent
Formació post-secundària Treballadors del coneixement d’alta qualificació
Organització del treball
Taylorista, jeràrquica Plana, col.legial
Accountability
Bàsicament vers les autoritats Bàsicament als iguals i a la comunitat d’actors
13.
14.
15.
16. PISA Briefing of Council
OECD Programme for
International Student Assessment 14 November 2007 16
16
17. PISA Briefing of Council
OECD Programme for
International Student Assessment 14 November 2007 17
17
18. PISA Briefing of Council
OECD Programme for
International Student Assessment 14 November 2007 18
18
I am going to present evidence on separate issues in turn, but it is their interdependence that is key to understanding the nature of the policy and implementation challenges. If you simply raise entrance standards for teachers, you will choke off supply unless compensation and working conditions are aligned. Raising pay and changing working conditions alone won’t automatically translate into improvements in teacher quality unless standards are raised. Teacher evaluation systems have limited impact where they only relate to compensation but not professional development and career advancement. Giving teachers more autonomy can be counterproductive if the quality and education of the teachers are inadequate.Education is ultimately about student learning outcomes……and these Learning outcomes are the result of what happens in the classroom.Instructional policies and practices, in turn, are shaped by people - teachers, principles and families. And that’s why the quality of an education system cannot exceed the quality of its teachers.But it works the other way round too: The quality of teachers cannot exceed the quality of work organization, the quality of teacher selection and education, teacher careers and teacher evaluation.And it is those processes that we can shape with policy tools. And success depends on the design and implementation of effective policies.
I want to conclude with what we have learned about successful reform trajectories In the past when you only needed a small slice of well-educated people it was efficient for governments to invest a large sum in a small elite to lead the country. But the social and economic cost of low educational performance has risen substantially and all young people now need to leave school with strong foundation skills.When you could still assume that what you learn in school will last for a lifetime, teaching content and routine cognitive skills was at the centre of education. Today, where you can access content on Google, where routine cognitive skills are being digitised or outsourced, and where jobs are changing rapidly, the focus is on enabling people to become lifelong learners, to manage complex ways of thinking and complex ways of working that computers cannot take over easily.In the past, teachers had sometimes only a few years more education than the students they taught. When teacher quality is so low, governments tend to tell their teachers exactly what to do and exactly how they want it done and they tend to use Tayloristic methods of administrative control and accountability to get the results they want. Today the challenge is to make teaching a profession of high-level knowledge workers. But such people will not work in schools organised as Tayloristic workplaces using administrative forms of accountability and bureaucratic command and control systems to direct their work. To attract the people they need, successful education systems have transformed the form of work organisation in their schools to a professional form of work organisation in which professional norms of control complement bureaucratic and administrative forms of control.