SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 30
Descargar para leer sin conexión
By: Ayush Jain
(141435)
Jaypee University of Information Technology
Solan, Himachal Pradesh
WWW Journey
Contents:
Introduction to WWW
The W3 Consortium
WWW 2.0
WWW 3.0
WWW 4.0
WWW 5.0
Conclusion
Introduction to WWW:
The World Wide Web (also known as the web) is a system of
interlinked hypertext documents accessed via the Internet. The World
Wide Web was established with the objective of accessing the data
from anywhere at any time in form of interlinked hypertext language.
The World Wide Web is not homologous to internet but is the most
obtrusive part of the internet that can be defined as techno-social
system for the interaction between human and technological networks.
With a web browser, one can view web pages that may contain text,
images, videos, and other multimedia and navigate between them via
hyperlinks.
Introduction to WWW (contd.):
On March 12, 1989, Tim Berners- Lee, a British computer scientist
wrote a proposal for the World Wide Web. The 1989 proposal was
meant for a more effective CERN communication system but
Berners- Lee eventually realized the concept could be
implemented throughout the world. Berners- Lee and Belgian
computer scientist Robert Cailliau proposed in 1990 to use
hypertext to link and access information of various kinds as a web
of nodes in which the user can browse at will .
W3 Consortium:
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an international
community where Member organizations, a full-time staff, and the
public work together to develop Web standards. Led by Web
inventor Tim Berners-Lee and CEO Jeffrey Jaffe, W3C's mission is
to lead the Web to its full potential.
Web 1.0:
• Web 1.0 was first implementation of the web and it lasted from 1989
to 2005.
• It was define as web of information connections.
• It was “read-only” web.
• It is an information space in which the items of interest referred to as
resources are identified by global identifier called as Uniform
Resources Identifiers (URIs)
• There was very little in the way of user interaction or content
contribution.
Characteristics – Web 1.0:
 Web 1.0 Technologies includes core web protocols: HTML, HTTP
and URI.
 The contact information provided by the Web 1.0 is email, fax,
phone number and address.
 They use Frameset.
 It used static pages and was for content delivery purpose only.
 It allowed us to search for information and read it.
Limitations – Web 1.0:
 The Web 1.0 pages can only be understood by humans (web
readers) they do not have machine compatible content.
 The web master is solely responsible for updating users and
managing the content of website.
 Lack of Dynamic representation i.e., to acquire only static
information, no web console were available to performing dynamic
events.
 They do not support mass-publishing.
Web 2.0:
 Web 2.0 is the second generation of web. It was defined by Dale
Dougherty in 2004 as a read-write web.
 Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused
by the move to the internet as platform, and an attempt to
understand the rules for success on that new platform. Chief among
those rules is this: Build applications that harness network effects to
get better the more people use them.
 Web 2.0 facilitates participatory, collaborative, and distributed
practices. which enable formal and non-formal spheres of daily
activities.
Web 2.0:
 Other terms used to characterize Web 2.0 include “relationship”
technologies, participatory media and a social digital technology
which is also known as the wisdom web, people-centric web and
participative web with reading and writing, the web could become bi-
directional.
 The user of Web 2.0 has more interaction with less control. Flexible
web design, creative reuse, updates, collaborative content creation
and modification were facilitated through web 2.0. One of the
outstanding feature of the web 2.0 is to support collaboration and to
help gather collective intelligence.
Limitations - Web 2.0:
 Constant iteration cycle of Change and Updates to services.
 Ethical issues concerning build and usage of Web 2.0
 Interconnectivity and knowledge sharing between platforms
across community boundaries are still limited.
Comparison – Web 1.0 & Web 2.0:
Web 3.0:
 Web 3.0 was first coined by John Markoff and he suggested web 3.0
as third generation of the web in 2006.
 Web 3.0 can be also stated as “executable Web”.
 The basic idea of web 3.0 is to define structure data and link them in
order to more effective discovery, automation, integration, and reuse
across various applications. It is able to improve data management,
support accessibility of mobile internet, simulate creativity and
innovation, encourage factor of globalization phenomena, enhance
customers’ satisfaction and help to organize collaboration in social
web.
Web 3.0:
 Web 3.0 is also known as semantic web.
 Web3.0 supports world wide database and web oriented
architecture which in earlier stage was described as a web of
document. It deals mainly with static HTML documents, but
dynamically rendered pages and alternative formats should follow
the same conceptual layout standards whenever possible and links
are between documents or part of them.
 Semantics of content and links are implicit and the degree of
structure between objects is fairly low
Web of documents:
Web of Data:
 The Web of Data envision much of the world's data being
interrelated and openly accessible to the general public.
 Web of Data hosts a variety of data sets.
 In some ways like a global database that most its features are
included Semantics of content and links are explicit and the degree
of structure between objects is high based on RDF model.
Web of Data:
Semantic Web:
 The Semantic Web provides a common framework that allows data
to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and
community boundaries.
 If HTML and the Web made all the online documents look like one
huge book, RDF, schema, and inference languages will make all the
data in the world look like one huge database
Characteristics – Web3.0
 SaaS Business Model.
 Open Source Software Platform.
 Distributed Database –or what called as “The World Wide
Database”.
 Web Personalization.
 Resource Pooling
 Intelligent Web.
Challenges – Web 3.0:
 Vastness: The World Wide Web contains many billions of pages.
Redundancy in Data may occur which has not yet been able to
eliminate all semantically duplicated terms.
 Vagueness: This arises from the vagueness of user queries, of
concepts represented by content providers, of matching query terms
to provider terms and of trying to combine different knowledge bases
with overlapping but subtly different concepts.
 Inconsistency: These are logical contradictions which will inevitably
arise during the development of large ontologies, and when
ontologies from separate sources are combined.
 Deceit: This is when the producer of the information is intentionally
misleading the consumer of the information.
Comparison
Web 4.0:
Web 4.0 can be considered as an Ultra-Intelligent Electronic Agent,
symbiotic web and ubiquitous web. Interaction between humans and
machines in symbiosis was motive behind of the symbiotic web.
Powerful as human brain, progress in the development of
telecommunications, Advancement on nanotechnology in the world
and controlled interfaces using web 4.0. In simple words, machines
would be clever on reading the contents of the web, and react in the
form of executing and deciding what to execute first to load the
websites fast with superior quality and performance and build more
commanding interfaces.
Web 4.0 (contd.):
Web 4.0 will be read write concurrency web. Global transparency is
delivering by achieving a mass participation in online networks. The
entrepreneurs created the first web 4.0 consumer electronics i.e. if you
visit amazon.com more than once and it will recognize you and provide
relevant and personalized advice. One of the most critical
developments of Web 4.0 will be the migration of online functionality
into the physical world.
Web 5.0:
Web 5.0 is still an underground idea in progress and there is no exact
definition of how it would be. Web 5.0 can be considered as Symbionet
web, decentralized i.e. it is not possible to have a Personal Server (PS)
for any personal data or information stored on the net, and people tries
to get interconnected via Smart Communicator (SC), like Smart
phones, Tablets or Personal Robots. The Symbionet servers will be
able to use a part of "memory and calculation power" of each
interconnected SC, in order to calculate the billions and billions needed
data to built the 3D world, and to feed it's Artificial Intelligence surf
alone.
Web 5.0 (Contd.):
Currently the Web is "emotionally" neutral: do not feel the user
perceives. One example of this is www.wefeelfine.org, which maps
emotions of people. The company Emotive Systems has created,
neuro technology through headphones that allow users to interact with
content that meets their emotions or change in real time facial
expression.
So, Web 5.0 is the future of the web.
Conclusion:
We have seen the evolution of web forms web 1.0, web 2.0, web 3.0,
web 4.0 and web 5.0. Web 1.0 as web of cognition i.e. read only web,
Web 2.0 as people-centric and participative web i.e. read-write web,
Web 3.0 as web of knowledge connection i.e. read-write-execution
web, Web 4.0 as Ultra-Intelligent Electronic Agent i.e. read-write-
execution web with concurrency and Web 5.0 as a quasi emotive web
described as fifth generation web.
References:
 Research Papers:
 Nupur Choudhury / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer
Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 5 (6) , 2014, 8096-
8100
 Incremental Journey for World Wide Web: Introduced with Web
1.0 to Recent Web 5.0 – A Survey Paper by Karan Patel
 Books:
 Internet & World Wide Web How to Program, 4/E, Deitel & Deitel
 Programming the World Wide Web, 4/E, Robert W. Sebesta
 Web Resources:
 www.w3.org
Thankyou
Questions?

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Web1, web2 and web 3
Web1, web2 and web 3Web1, web2 and web 3
Web1, web2 and web 3
mercedeh37
 
What is Web 3.0?
What is Web 3.0?What is Web 3.0?
What is Web 3.0?
Johan Koren
 
Security-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-Logic
Security-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-LogicSecurity-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-Logic
Security-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-Logic
Nana Kwame(Emeritus) Gyamfi
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Web 1.0
Web 1.0Web 1.0
Web 1.0
 
Document of presentation(web 3.0)(part 2)
Document of presentation(web 3.0)(part 2)Document of presentation(web 3.0)(part 2)
Document of presentation(web 3.0)(part 2)
 
Web1, web2 and web 3
Web1, web2 and web 3Web1, web2 and web 3
Web1, web2 and web 3
 
Web 3.0 & IoT (English)
Web 3.0 & IoT (English)Web 3.0 & IoT (English)
Web 3.0 & IoT (English)
 
Web 3.0 and What It Means to Marketing
Web 3.0 and What It Means to MarketingWeb 3.0 and What It Means to Marketing
Web 3.0 and What It Means to Marketing
 
Web 1.0 2.0-3.0-4.0 Overview
Web 1.0 2.0-3.0-4.0 OverviewWeb 1.0 2.0-3.0-4.0 Overview
Web 1.0 2.0-3.0-4.0 Overview
 
Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 - Evolution of the Web and its Various Challenges
Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 - Evolution of the Web and its Various ChallengesWeb 1.0 to Web 3.0 - Evolution of the Web and its Various Challenges
Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 - Evolution of the Web and its Various Challenges
 
Web 1.0 2.0 3.0
Web 1.0  2.0  3.0Web 1.0  2.0  3.0
Web 1.0 2.0 3.0
 
Web 1.0, 2.0 & 3.0
Web 1.0, 2.0 & 3.0Web 1.0, 2.0 & 3.0
Web 1.0, 2.0 & 3.0
 
WEB 1.0 - 3.0
WEB 1.0 - 3.0WEB 1.0 - 3.0
WEB 1.0 - 3.0
 
What is Web 3.0?
What is Web 3.0?What is Web 3.0?
What is Web 3.0?
 
Detail History of web 1.0 to 3.0
Detail History of web 1.0 to 3.0Detail History of web 1.0 to 3.0
Detail History of web 1.0 to 3.0
 
The Web: history - now - future
The Web: history - now - futureThe Web: history - now - future
The Web: history - now - future
 
Lesson 1: Intoduction to ICT
Lesson 1: Intoduction to ICTLesson 1: Intoduction to ICT
Lesson 1: Intoduction to ICT
 
Team 3 Web 2.0 Web 3.0 V2 Linkdin
Team 3 Web 2.0 Web 3.0 V2 LinkdinTeam 3 Web 2.0 Web 3.0 V2 Linkdin
Team 3 Web 2.0 Web 3.0 V2 Linkdin
 
Web 1.0 2.0 3.0
Web 1.0 2.0 3.0Web 1.0 2.0 3.0
Web 1.0 2.0 3.0
 
Fa13 7718-ch3-kim
Fa13 7718-ch3-kimFa13 7718-ch3-kim
Fa13 7718-ch3-kim
 
Security-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-Logic
Security-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-LogicSecurity-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-Logic
Security-Challenges-in-Implementing-Semantic-Web-Unifying-Logic
 
Web 3.0
Web 3.0Web 3.0
Web 3.0
 
Web 3.0 :The Evolution of Web
Web 3.0:The Evolution of WebWeb 3.0:The Evolution of Web
Web 3.0 :The Evolution of Web
 

Similar a Www journey

Walking Our Way to the Web
Walking Our Way to the WebWalking Our Way to the Web
Walking Our Way to the Web
Fabien Gandon
 
Web 3.0 - Media Theory
Web 3.0 - Media TheoryWeb 3.0 - Media Theory
Web 3.0 - Media Theory
Akshay Iyer
 
web 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of web
web 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of webweb 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of web
web 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of web
achuarjunnattakom
 
Amaxus con webdoc_10773
Amaxus con webdoc_10773Amaxus con webdoc_10773
Amaxus con webdoc_10773
vafopoulos
 
Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?
Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?
Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?
electricgeisha
 

Similar a Www journey (20)

Trends and advancement in www (web 1.0 and web2.0) assignment
Trends and advancement in www (web 1.0 and web2.0) assignment Trends and advancement in www (web 1.0 and web2.0) assignment
Trends and advancement in www (web 1.0 and web2.0) assignment
 
Evolution Of WEB_students.pptx
Evolution Of WEB_students.pptxEvolution Of WEB_students.pptx
Evolution Of WEB_students.pptx
 
Technology .pdf
Technology .pdfTechnology .pdf
Technology .pdf
 
Walking Our Way to the Web
Walking Our Way to the WebWalking Our Way to the Web
Walking Our Way to the Web
 
Semantic web
Semantic webSemantic web
Semantic web
 
Web 3.0 - Media Theory
Web 3.0 - Media TheoryWeb 3.0 - Media Theory
Web 3.0 - Media Theory
 
Beyond Web 2.0 ... What's Next?
Beyond Web 2.0 ... What's Next?Beyond Web 2.0 ... What's Next?
Beyond Web 2.0 ... What's Next?
 
ICT Today
ICT TodayICT Today
ICT Today
 
Empowerment Technology Lesson 1
Empowerment Technology Lesson 1Empowerment Technology Lesson 1
Empowerment Technology Lesson 1
 
Article on web1.0 to 5.0 apino technology
Article on web1.0 to 5.0 apino technologyArticle on web1.0 to 5.0 apino technology
Article on web1.0 to 5.0 apino technology
 
web 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of web
web 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of webweb 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of web
web 3 poerpoint presentation in simple words and the evolution of web
 
Towards Web 3.0: An Application Oriented Approach
Towards Web 3.0: An Application Oriented ApproachTowards Web 3.0: An Application Oriented Approach
Towards Web 3.0: An Application Oriented Approach
 
Powerpoint.pptx
Powerpoint.pptxPowerpoint.pptx
Powerpoint.pptx
 
Web 3.0? A look at the future of the World Wide Web
Web 3.0?  A look at the future of the World Wide WebWeb 3.0?  A look at the future of the World Wide Web
Web 3.0? A look at the future of the World Wide Web
 
Web 2 and 3
Web 2 and 3Web 2 and 3
Web 2 and 3
 
Web 2.0 By Nyros Developer
Web 2.0 By Nyros DeveloperWeb 2.0 By Nyros Developer
Web 2.0 By Nyros Developer
 
BEGIN BLOCKCHAIN - Module 1 FINAL.pptx
BEGIN BLOCKCHAIN - Module 1 FINAL.pptxBEGIN BLOCKCHAIN - Module 1 FINAL.pptx
BEGIN BLOCKCHAIN - Module 1 FINAL.pptx
 
Amaxus con webdoc_10773
Amaxus con webdoc_10773Amaxus con webdoc_10773
Amaxus con webdoc_10773
 
Presentation web 3.0(part 1)
Presentation web 3.0(part 1)Presentation web 3.0(part 1)
Presentation web 3.0(part 1)
 
Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?
Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?
Web 1, 2 or 3 - Which One Are You?
 

Último

Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Victor Rentea
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
panagenda
 

Último (20)

Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdfRansomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 

Www journey

  • 1. By: Ayush Jain (141435) Jaypee University of Information Technology Solan, Himachal Pradesh WWW Journey
  • 2. Contents: Introduction to WWW The W3 Consortium WWW 2.0 WWW 3.0 WWW 4.0 WWW 5.0 Conclusion
  • 3. Introduction to WWW: The World Wide Web (also known as the web) is a system of interlinked hypertext documents accessed via the Internet. The World Wide Web was established with the objective of accessing the data from anywhere at any time in form of interlinked hypertext language. The World Wide Web is not homologous to internet but is the most obtrusive part of the internet that can be defined as techno-social system for the interaction between human and technological networks. With a web browser, one can view web pages that may contain text, images, videos, and other multimedia and navigate between them via hyperlinks.
  • 4. Introduction to WWW (contd.): On March 12, 1989, Tim Berners- Lee, a British computer scientist wrote a proposal for the World Wide Web. The 1989 proposal was meant for a more effective CERN communication system but Berners- Lee eventually realized the concept could be implemented throughout the world. Berners- Lee and Belgian computer scientist Robert Cailliau proposed in 1990 to use hypertext to link and access information of various kinds as a web of nodes in which the user can browse at will .
  • 5. W3 Consortium: The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an international community where Member organizations, a full-time staff, and the public work together to develop Web standards. Led by Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee and CEO Jeffrey Jaffe, W3C's mission is to lead the Web to its full potential.
  • 6. Web 1.0: • Web 1.0 was first implementation of the web and it lasted from 1989 to 2005. • It was define as web of information connections. • It was “read-only” web. • It is an information space in which the items of interest referred to as resources are identified by global identifier called as Uniform Resources Identifiers (URIs) • There was very little in the way of user interaction or content contribution.
  • 7. Characteristics – Web 1.0:  Web 1.0 Technologies includes core web protocols: HTML, HTTP and URI.  The contact information provided by the Web 1.0 is email, fax, phone number and address.  They use Frameset.  It used static pages and was for content delivery purpose only.  It allowed us to search for information and read it.
  • 8. Limitations – Web 1.0:  The Web 1.0 pages can only be understood by humans (web readers) they do not have machine compatible content.  The web master is solely responsible for updating users and managing the content of website.  Lack of Dynamic representation i.e., to acquire only static information, no web console were available to performing dynamic events.  They do not support mass-publishing.
  • 9. Web 2.0:  Web 2.0 is the second generation of web. It was defined by Dale Dougherty in 2004 as a read-write web.  Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. Chief among those rules is this: Build applications that harness network effects to get better the more people use them.  Web 2.0 facilitates participatory, collaborative, and distributed practices. which enable formal and non-formal spheres of daily activities.
  • 10. Web 2.0:  Other terms used to characterize Web 2.0 include “relationship” technologies, participatory media and a social digital technology which is also known as the wisdom web, people-centric web and participative web with reading and writing, the web could become bi- directional.  The user of Web 2.0 has more interaction with less control. Flexible web design, creative reuse, updates, collaborative content creation and modification were facilitated through web 2.0. One of the outstanding feature of the web 2.0 is to support collaboration and to help gather collective intelligence.
  • 11. Limitations - Web 2.0:  Constant iteration cycle of Change and Updates to services.  Ethical issues concerning build and usage of Web 2.0  Interconnectivity and knowledge sharing between platforms across community boundaries are still limited.
  • 12. Comparison – Web 1.0 & Web 2.0:
  • 13. Web 3.0:  Web 3.0 was first coined by John Markoff and he suggested web 3.0 as third generation of the web in 2006.  Web 3.0 can be also stated as “executable Web”.  The basic idea of web 3.0 is to define structure data and link them in order to more effective discovery, automation, integration, and reuse across various applications. It is able to improve data management, support accessibility of mobile internet, simulate creativity and innovation, encourage factor of globalization phenomena, enhance customers’ satisfaction and help to organize collaboration in social web.
  • 14. Web 3.0:  Web 3.0 is also known as semantic web.  Web3.0 supports world wide database and web oriented architecture which in earlier stage was described as a web of document. It deals mainly with static HTML documents, but dynamically rendered pages and alternative formats should follow the same conceptual layout standards whenever possible and links are between documents or part of them.  Semantics of content and links are implicit and the degree of structure between objects is fairly low
  • 16. Web of Data:  The Web of Data envision much of the world's data being interrelated and openly accessible to the general public.  Web of Data hosts a variety of data sets.  In some ways like a global database that most its features are included Semantics of content and links are explicit and the degree of structure between objects is high based on RDF model.
  • 18. Semantic Web:  The Semantic Web provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries.  If HTML and the Web made all the online documents look like one huge book, RDF, schema, and inference languages will make all the data in the world look like one huge database
  • 19.
  • 20. Characteristics – Web3.0  SaaS Business Model.  Open Source Software Platform.  Distributed Database –or what called as “The World Wide Database”.  Web Personalization.  Resource Pooling  Intelligent Web.
  • 21. Challenges – Web 3.0:  Vastness: The World Wide Web contains many billions of pages. Redundancy in Data may occur which has not yet been able to eliminate all semantically duplicated terms.  Vagueness: This arises from the vagueness of user queries, of concepts represented by content providers, of matching query terms to provider terms and of trying to combine different knowledge bases with overlapping but subtly different concepts.  Inconsistency: These are logical contradictions which will inevitably arise during the development of large ontologies, and when ontologies from separate sources are combined.  Deceit: This is when the producer of the information is intentionally misleading the consumer of the information.
  • 23. Web 4.0: Web 4.0 can be considered as an Ultra-Intelligent Electronic Agent, symbiotic web and ubiquitous web. Interaction between humans and machines in symbiosis was motive behind of the symbiotic web. Powerful as human brain, progress in the development of telecommunications, Advancement on nanotechnology in the world and controlled interfaces using web 4.0. In simple words, machines would be clever on reading the contents of the web, and react in the form of executing and deciding what to execute first to load the websites fast with superior quality and performance and build more commanding interfaces.
  • 24. Web 4.0 (contd.): Web 4.0 will be read write concurrency web. Global transparency is delivering by achieving a mass participation in online networks. The entrepreneurs created the first web 4.0 consumer electronics i.e. if you visit amazon.com more than once and it will recognize you and provide relevant and personalized advice. One of the most critical developments of Web 4.0 will be the migration of online functionality into the physical world.
  • 25. Web 5.0: Web 5.0 is still an underground idea in progress and there is no exact definition of how it would be. Web 5.0 can be considered as Symbionet web, decentralized i.e. it is not possible to have a Personal Server (PS) for any personal data or information stored on the net, and people tries to get interconnected via Smart Communicator (SC), like Smart phones, Tablets or Personal Robots. The Symbionet servers will be able to use a part of "memory and calculation power" of each interconnected SC, in order to calculate the billions and billions needed data to built the 3D world, and to feed it's Artificial Intelligence surf alone.
  • 26. Web 5.0 (Contd.): Currently the Web is "emotionally" neutral: do not feel the user perceives. One example of this is www.wefeelfine.org, which maps emotions of people. The company Emotive Systems has created, neuro technology through headphones that allow users to interact with content that meets their emotions or change in real time facial expression. So, Web 5.0 is the future of the web.
  • 27. Conclusion: We have seen the evolution of web forms web 1.0, web 2.0, web 3.0, web 4.0 and web 5.0. Web 1.0 as web of cognition i.e. read only web, Web 2.0 as people-centric and participative web i.e. read-write web, Web 3.0 as web of knowledge connection i.e. read-write-execution web, Web 4.0 as Ultra-Intelligent Electronic Agent i.e. read-write- execution web with concurrency and Web 5.0 as a quasi emotive web described as fifth generation web.
  • 28. References:  Research Papers:  Nupur Choudhury / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 5 (6) , 2014, 8096- 8100  Incremental Journey for World Wide Web: Introduced with Web 1.0 to Recent Web 5.0 – A Survey Paper by Karan Patel  Books:  Internet & World Wide Web How to Program, 4/E, Deitel & Deitel  Programming the World Wide Web, 4/E, Robert W. Sebesta  Web Resources:  www.w3.org