This presentation, the first in a three part series was presented by Dr. Mike Brogan, COO of Enerit (www.enerit.com) at a seminar entitled CYS EN ISO 50001 in Cyrpus in April 2014.
The presentation covers the following areas;
*What is Systematic Energy Management?
Proven Benefits
*Main Requirements of CYS EN ISO 50001
*Implementation of CYS EN ISO 50001 Energy Management System
*Case Studies
*How ICT Helps
*How do I get started?
*Where am I now?
*And what do I do next?
CYS EN ISO 50001 is Proven to Generate Significant Energy Savings! (Part 1 of 3)
1. CYS EN ISO 50001
is proven to generate
Significant Energy Savings!
Learn how you can implement this best practice approach
www.cys.org.cy
SPONSORS
2. CYS EN ISO 50001
Is proven to generate Significant Energy Savings !
Thursday 10th April 2014
University of Nicosia
Cyprus
3. Agenda
9:50 – 10:40
What is Systematic Energy Management?
Proven Benefits
Main Requirements of CYS EN ISO 50001
o Coffee Break
11:00 – 11:45
Implementation of CYS EN ISO 50001 Energy
Management System
11:45 – 12:30
Case Studies
How ICT Helps
How do I get started?Where am I now? And what do I do
next?
4. QSET
software
SEAI Energy
consultants
large MNC’s
(IS 393 software)
Members
EN/ISO
50001
committees
First installs:
buildings &
industry
EN 16001
software
deployed
Enerit ISO
50001
software
launched
18 years in Software for ISO Standards
1995 2004 2006 2008 2010 2011
Enerit
Founded
6. Questions for the Day…
How is your company organized to address energy - - formal
system? informal system? designated corporate energy manager?
Have you set energy performance goals within the company?
What do they look like?
Have you conducted energy audits - if so, how have they been
conducted and what benefits have you realized?
What types of energy reduction projects have you pursued or are
you planning? Have significant ROI's been realized on any of these
projects?
What system linkages have you created between GHG and energy
throughout your organization?
Have you considered establishing a formal EnMS and seeking
certification of this system? Under ISO 50001?
What types of information systems are you using to track and
manage energy performance? Is it effective/efficient? What would
you like to change about data processing?
13. Systematic Energy Management
Management commitment,
Resources, Planning
Understanding your
energy usage and how
to control it
Develop and energy
efficiency culture
Balance of all 3 for
successful
Energy Management
14. 0 Years
+5%
0
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
-25%
Costs
Project Based Approach to Energy Management
Rising
costs
Miscellaneous
actions
Cycle 1
Costs rising
again
Miscellaneous
Actions repeated
Cycle 2 Cycle repeated
LIMITED CONTROL OF ENERGY COSTS AND ACTIONS !
15. Systematic Approach to Energy Management
5 years
+5%
0
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
-25%
Costs
commitment to energy
management implementation
Increasing
energy
consumption
Decreasing energy cost
by applying simple
energy saving actions
investment (e.g. purchase of
more efficient equipment
Further energy savings
due to promotion of
energy efficient practices
further investment (e.g.
technical improvement
of plant
Saving energy becomes
company culture
Real example from
Pharmaceutical company
18. 6500 ISO 50001 certs globally to March 2014
Forecasted number of certs is 230,000 by 2022
Improved reporting & visibility of Energy Saving
Results has resulted in increased interest in
implementing an ISO 50001 style system
ISO 50001 Adoption
19. Why ISO 50001 EnMS? – Evidence
speaks for itself!
BSI Group ...Sheffield Hallam University in the UK reduced its
carbon emissions by 11% once it was certified.
Annual savings of over £100,000 ($160.7k).
Deloitte research has shown that organizations pursuing a
systematic energy management approach are achieving three
times more savings that those who do not (7.2% versus 2.4 %.)
The range of savings found by Certification Europe are from 6-
37%.
20.
21. approach are 13.7% versus Business-as-Usual approach of 3.6%.
http://www.superiorenergyperformance.ne
t/results.html
US SEP ISO 50001 Delivers
10.1% Additional Energy Savings
22. Systematic Energy Management approach 13.7%
v
Business-as-Usual approach 3.6%
approach are 13.7% versus Business-as-Usual approach of 3.6%.
http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net/results.html
SEP ISO 50001 Delivers 10.1% Additional Energy Savings
23.
24. Top 4 SEP Performers
Ontario, NY 16.50% 2013
Brockville, Ontario, Canada 15.20% 2012
Platinum: Energy Performance Pathway
Improvement over 3 years
Dublin, VA 25.80% 2012
Texas City, TX 17.10% 2011
25. Leading Approach is Achieving 3
Times More Savings
2.4%
3.3%
4.8%
7.2%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0%
Basic
Engaged
Advanced
Leading
Average Annual % Reduction
Basic
Engaged
Advanced
Leading
Source: Deloitte:The Power Shift. BusinessesTakes a New Look at Energy Strategy
26. 63% of energy savings cannot be kicked!
(i.e. not equipment)
32. Focus on significant energy savings!
ISO 14001 focuses on
environmental impacts of energy
and risk avoidance and not so
much on costs
ISO 50001 can focus on other
factors including cost savings
Ref: Edwin Pinero, ISO
33. Organisational Benefits of
Integration
Reduce administration time to pursue improvement opportunities.
Better teamwork for more effective energy saving action
completion
Use of existing materials/resources and eliminate duplication
across the management systems.
Ease of finding information so available to right person easily.
Better planning of management activities (e.g. audits, meetings,
actions).
Easier implementation and maintenance of the certifications.
Common methods for processing environmental and energy saving
suggestions and actions
34. Ref: ISO 50001 Standard
Plan – Do - Check - Act
Monitoring,
Measurement and
Analysis
Nonconformities,
Correction,
Corrective and
Preventive Actions
Internal Audits of
the EnMS
Management
Review
Energy Policy
Energy Planning
Implementation and
Operation
Checking
“The Chassis” and the “Driver”
Commitment byTop Management
Demonstrate continual improvement
Set Objectives andTargets
Complying with regulations and overall that
Review the EnMS regularly
The “Fuel”
Analyse Energy Sources and Usage
Identify Significant Energy Uses (SEU)
Establish Energy Baseline and EnPIs.
Review applicable laws and regulations
Set Objectives &Targets
Create Action Plans
The “Engine”
Competency and training
Awareness
Effectve Operational control
Design
Communication
Procurement
Document Control & Records
The “Dashboard”
Monitoring - SEUs, Energy Sources, EnPIs
Internal Audits
Corrective Actions
Control of Records
The “Check-Up Service”:
Review and “fix” of energy policy
Review and “fix” energy performance,
EnPIs.
Review audit results and “fix” (NCs)
Review and “fix” objectives and targets.
ISO 50001 EnMS Standard
35. General Requirements
Establish, document, implement,
maintain, and improve the energy
management system (EnMS)
Define the scope and boundaries of its
EnMS
State how you will achieve continual
improvement of energy
performance and the EnMS
37. 14
All Levels have a Role
Chief Executive
o Commitment, Leadership
Production Managers
o Holds departmental budgets
Chief Engineer
o Designs process, facilitates production
Energy Manager
o Investigates, monitors, facilitates
Line Personnel
o Use and save energy
39. A good plan
Operational
Level
Programme Management
Energy Manager
Facilities Mgr
Production Mgr
Environmental Mgr
Strategic Level
CEO’s
Senior Managers
Sign off the plan
Provide resources
People Management
Project Management
Company targets
Programme Plan
40. Planning Inputs
Past and present
energy uses
Energy Review Planning Outputs
- Relevant variables
affecting significant
energy use
- Performance
Analyze energy use
& consumption
Identify areas of
significant energy
use and
consumption
Identify
opportunities for
improving energy
performance
Legal/other
requirements
- Energy baseline
- EnPI(s)
- Objectives
- Targets
- Action Plans
ISO 50001 – Energy Planning Process
42. Energy Review
Identify energy improvement opportunities
o record (energy audits, suggestions, best practices)
o Prioritize (cost savings, payback, complexity)
43. Energy Performance Indicators
(EnPIs)
Simple metrics such as monthly or annual
energy consumption
simple ratios e.g. kWh/tonne, Btu/ton,
Kwh/m2 (used with caution)
a complex model e.g. regression analysis of
energy consumed against appropriate
variables