Flink Forward San Francisco 2018: Andrew Gao & Jeff Sharpe - "Finding Bad Acorns"
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
3 recomendaciones•3,078 vistas
Within fintech catching fraudsters is one of the primary opportunities for us to use streaming applications to apply ML models in real-time. This talk will be a review of our journey to bring fraud decisioning to our tellers at Capital One using Kafka, Flink and AWS Lambda. We will share our learnings and experiences to common problems such as custom windowing, breaking down a monolith app to small queryable state apps, feature engineering with Jython, dealing with back pressure from combining two disparate streams, model/feature validation in a regulatory environment, and running Flink jobs on Kubernetes.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Similar a Flink Forward San Francisco 2018: Andrew Gao & Jeff Sharpe - "Finding Bad Acorns"
Similar a Flink Forward San Francisco 2018: Andrew Gao & Jeff Sharpe - "Finding Bad Acorns" (20)
Más de Flink Forward
Más de Flink Forward (20)
Último
Último (20)
Flink Forward San Francisco 2018: Andrew Gao & Jeff Sharpe - "Finding Bad Acorns"
- 1. FINDING BAD ACORNS ANDREW GAO & JEFF SHARPE FLINK FORWARD 2018
- 2. ANDREW GAO JEFF SHARPE
- 3. Developing a Fraud Defense Platform Fraud Defense at the Teller Using Flink Our journey to build a Fraud Decisioning Platform and use Flink to build out the use cases
- 4. DEVELOPING A FRAUD DEFENSE PLATFORM
- 9. RUNNING ON
- 11. RUNNING ON
- 12. PROS • Community support for Docker/Kube • Resilient • Easy to tear down and bring back • Maximizing resource efficiency CONS • Maintaining your own Kubernetes solution • Containing blast radius • Edge cases when combining # of technology solutions Developing on Kubernetes has been challenging but very rewarding
- 14. FRAUD DEFENSE AT THE TELLER
- 16. A FLINK MONOLITH • Problem: Develop a stream processing workflow for two legacy batch data sources • First Attempt: Do everything in Flink and take advantage of Flink Connected Streams
- 17. 1 2 3 Using Flink operators to build our application workflow 4
- 18. PROS • Cheap • Not a lot of Code/Config • Scalability / Availability • Deployments are a breeze CONS • Not truly stateless • Start-up time AWS Lambda is a good fit for our use case and works well with our underlying technologies
- 19. 1 2 3 Using Flink operators to build our application workflow 4
- 20. 90 Day Storage Window CUSTOM WINDOWS FOR OPTIMIZATION AND PORTABILITY 30 Day Virtual View 90 Day Filtered View
- 21. CUSTOM WINDOWS FOR OPTIMIZATION AND PORTABILITY Most-Recent-Beyond-24-Hours Window 24 Hour Offset Dynamic Window
- 22. 1 2 3 Using Flink operators to build our application workflow 4
- 23. USING JYTHON TO BRIDGE THE GAP TO DATA SCIENTISTS Flink Jython Adapter .py .py .py .py Windows Data Featur e Featur e Featur e Featur e Featur e Featur e Featur e Featur e .py .py .py .py Data
- 24. GITFLOW AND JYTHON IMPROVE TRACEABILITY Featur e JAR v1.0.42 Junit Tests Pull Request Merge Build Develop Denied Failed Maven Import Junit Tests Build Flink Job JAR Commit
- 25. 1 2 3 Using Flink operators to build our application workflow 4
- 26. FEATURES EXIST TO FEED MODELS FeatureFeature Model Model Score H20 Tensor Flow Seldon (whatever)
- 28. BREAKING UP THE MONOLITH • Problem: Back Pressure leading to Delayed Transactions • Solution: Break up the monolith Flink App into small Queryable State Apps
- 29. CHIPMUNKS
- 30. •Connected Streams •Flink Keyed State •Checkpointing/Savepointing •Queryable State Features Used •Flink Versioning (FLINK-7783, FLINK-8487) •Keyed Source Function •Kafka Offsets Issues We had a lot of fun and success using Flink, but not without a few hiccups
- 31. Developing a Fraud Defense Platform Fraud Defense at the Teller Using Flink Our journey to build a Fraud Decisioning Platform and use Flink to build out the use cases QUESTIONS?
Notas del editor
- Jeff Intro Andrew Intro We are part of the Forest teams(very high level intro) Kubernetes-based fraud decisioning platform that you can deploy multiple fraud use cases on With the goal of being able to rapidly spin up fraud apps Running in Production since September 2017
- Our talk today: Talk briefly about our journey building out this Forest platform using Kubernetes as well as talk about how we used Flink with Kubernetes at a high level Then talk about a specific use case we have on the platform and do a deep dive on what’s inside our Flink app
- Customers First If one day you take a look at your bank account and its empty However if your account was locked for no reason you would be upset This sense of balance between catching stopping fraud and providing a great customer experience is a common trend that we have to deal with If we wanted to stop fraud completely we could just stop letting people take their money On a similar note, we have a limited number of fraud operators Do not have the manpower to call every single person up and ask them Primary directive of the platform is to empower Data Scientists/ Data Analysts by building the tools on the platform to help create the models needed to make decisions This includes having access to all the data in a fast and easy-to-understand format Seeing how their models are performing, and whether the features are being calculated as expected When they need to refit the model they need to be able to do the data transformations quickly so we can turn a refreshed model around Lastly as we are developing a fraud platform, we need to keep in mind the engineers/developers that will be developing the fraud app it should be something that engineers enjoy to develop on When you have a feature/model/action repository its very easy to develop turn around fraud apps To help us balance these different needs we have our product owners to help bridge the gap
- Customers First If one day you take a look at your bank account and its empty However if your account was locked for no reason you would be upset This sense of balance between catching stopping fraud and providing a great customer experience is a common trend that we have to deal with If we wanted to stop fraud completely we could just stop letting people take their money On a similar note, we have a limited number of fraud operators Do not have the manpower to call every single person up and ask them Primary directive of the platform is to empower Data Scientists/ Data Analysts by building the tools on the platform to help create the models needed to make decisions This includes having access to all the data in a fast and easy-to-understand format Seeing how their models are performing, and whether the features are being calculated as expected When they need to refit the model they need to be able to do the data transformations quickly so we can turn a refreshed model around Lastly as we are developing a fraud platform, we need to keep in mind the engineers/developers that will be developing the fraud app it should be something that engineers enjoy to develop on When you have a feature/model/action repository its very easy to develop turn around fraud apps To help us balance these different needs we have our product owners to help bridge the gap
- 14 EC2s 6 m4.10xlarge for general minions 5 m4.2xlarge for kafka nodes 3 m4.large for masters Ansible to provision 200+ pods Flink apps in Java/Scala/Kotlin Microservices in Golang
- Holy smokes that’s a lot Zookeeper/Kafka/Flink/Nifi Kappa Architecture Kafka is our primary messaging bus throughout the platform Nifi is one of the tools we use to grab data from different sources in the company Flink does the calculations and applies needed transformations Minio/Istio to handle http communications throughout the platform EFK = ElasticSearch / FluentD / Kibana Docker logs Managed AWS service Influx / Prometheus / Grafana Metrics reporting and Dashboards Platform health Fraud health Drill / zeppelin / s3 for data analysts to view transactions Why are we switching from influx to prometheus
- Holy smokes that’s a lot Zookeeper/Kafka/Flink/Nifi Kafka is our primary messaging bus throughout the platform Nifi is one of the tools we use to grab data from different sources in the company Flink does the calculations and applies needed transformations Minio/Istio to handle http communications throughout the platform EFK = ElasticSearch / FluentD / Kibana Docker logs Managed AWS service Influx / Prometheus / Grafana Metrics reporting and Dashboards Platform health Fraud health Drill / zeppelin / s3 for data analysts to view transactions Why are we switching from influx to prometheus
- Kubernetes has been a challenge If a task manager goes down, it will auto-heal If your configurations are set up correctly you can just delete pods and they’ll come back Unless your configurations are completely fleshed out, the blast radius on failure can be rippling Situation where docker logs could not make it out to kubernetes logs because the docker machines were dying Developed internal tool for ci/cd and deployment
- Use cases tell us the resources they need and we provision them a flink cluster 1 Job Manager per cluster 5 Task Managers per cluster RocksDB backend Checkpoint/Savepoint persist on S3 Job Deployment Options
- Considerations People obviously don’t want to wait too long But we want to respond with the most data we have available on the customer
- Two data streams need to share state Data stream from online interactions / all other customer interactions Data stream that we receive from the branch Need to calculate Features Need to apply ML model Need to respond in real-time
- Developed in python, evaluating golang Developed internal tool for ci/cd and deployment
- Teller transactions have a real-time SLA Connected Streams is the culprit Break Up One Flink App into Smaller Flink Queryable State Apps Flink Apps as Functions Disparate Data Streams: Back Pressure In our case: we have all the account level activity for a given customer from one source and on the other we have the data from the teller machine Not all transactions are equal due to their source. However in a ML world we still want to examine every transaction Results in back pressure and uneven transaction flow
- Alvin for each data source Scurry of Alvins build out our feature repository Theodore builds his own features, adds on features for Alvin and the passes it down Why did we break Simon out? We can replace it with anything such as Seldon
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7783 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8487