1. WELCOME TO MY PRESENTATION
COURSE: ECO 584
Israt Jahan Nisha
ID: 2014-1-88-003

2. GAS AMADER SHOMPOD (GAS) PROKOLPO
 Starting time: January 2016
 Ending time: December, 2016
 Project area: Dhaka North City Corporation
 Number of target people: Around 5,00,000.

3. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT
 Wastage is eating up significant quantities of natural gas in
Bangladesh, which is suffering from a severe gas crisis that has
pushed the government to halt new gas connections to consumers.
 Since there is no incentive to conserve, there is significant wastage
of gas, the study said, adding that the requisite inspections and
maintenance are also often neglected.
 In Bangladesh, gas for households is provided under fixed rate and
this encourages unlimited usage at each households.
 The Helios Holding, a Japanese private company with the assistance
of Titas Gas will implement two projects of introducing 2.60 lakh
prepaid gas metres (PGM) in the capital city and the commercial
capital of the country aimed at preventing the wastage of natural gas
from July 2014-June 2022 and Karnaphuli from July 2014-2020.
 So, it will take more 5 to 7 years to completely make all the fixed
billing system to PGM, so as wastage will be continued in this sector.

4. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT (CONT.)
 Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) is the most environment-friendly
gas, which is introduced in Bangladesh for transportation since 2003.
 People waste this gas by keeping engines of the transport idly.
 People use private cars for really short trips, where people can go by
walk and walking is healthy.

5. OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT
 Reducing wastage of natural gas in domestic and
transportation sectors by 30% (of the 5,00,000 people)
through awareness building in the Dhaka North City
Corporation Area.

6. STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
 According to World Wilde Fund for Nature (WWF)-
 A stakeholder can be defined as ‘any individual, group,
institution who has a vested interest in the natural resources
of the project area and/or who potentially will be affected by
project activities and have something to gain or lose if
conditions change or stay the same’.

7. STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
 Institutions:
1. Donor
2. Titas gas
3. Local government
4. CNG filling stations
 Interest groups:
5. Female members of household
6. Maid servants
7. Drivers.
8. Private car owners
9. Fuel consumed public transport owners.
 Others:
10. Media

8. STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
Stakeholders Features Problems Interests
Donor Primary decision maker &
gives financial assistance
Reduce wastage of gas (Positive)
Titas gas Natural gas supplier Awareness building, reducing system loss and
increasing efficiency (Positive)
Local
government
Local ward counselor Political interest (Positive)
CNG stations CNG providers to fuel
consuming transports.
(Positive)
Female members
of household
Regular user of gas Lack of idea about the
wastage being made
Suggesting to use gas efficiently by informing the
negative impact of gas wastage. (Positive)
Maid Servants Regular user of gas under
supervision of households’
female members.
Lack of knowledge &
carelessness about the
scarce resources
Suggest not to ignite furnace unnecessarily
(Positive)
Drivers of fuel
consumed
vehicles
Regular users of gas under
supervision of their car
owners
Lack of knowledge. Informing them to shut down car engine while
sitting idle in the traffic jam. (Positive)
Private car
owners
Owner of fuel consumed
private car and also regular
Informing them to not use car for really short trips.
(Positive)

9. PROBLEM TREE
Inability to use more
gas in other sectors
Increasing
system losses
Wastage of natural gas by household and
transportation sector
Igniting gas
furnace
whole day to
save
matchstick
Drying up
clothes by
igniting
furnace
Keeping house
warm during
winter season by
igniting furnace
Keeping engine
idle while sitting
at traffic jam
Using private
car for short
trips
unnecessarily
Risk of
accidents
due to fire
burn
Lack of knowledge about
negative impact of gas wastage
Less awareness
about gas utilization
Effects
Causes

10. LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS MATRIX
Goal Reduced gas wastage and built awareness among people.
Purpose People became more conscious about gas utilization.
Outputs 1. Number of people igniting furnace for whole day reduced.
2. Number of people drying up clothes using furnace reduced.
3. Number of people keeping the house warm during winter season by using
furnace fell down.
4. Number of cars’ engine shutting down during traffic jam increased.
5. Number of people using cars for really short trips decreased.
Activities 1. Setting up rallies in the main roads.
2. Made documentary videos regarding how wastage can create scarcity in near
future which aired on TV.
3. Giving awareness message through popular TV shows & radio channels
4. Posters and leaflet developed.
5. Training on CNG utilization for all the licensed drivers conducted.
6. Making car owners aware to walk to go near places without using cars.

11. LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS MATRIX
(CONT.)
OVI
Goal 1. Reduced gas wastage by 30% of the 5,00,000 direct and indirect
gas users.
Purpose People became more conscious about the danger coming along
with the wastage of gas.
Outputs 1. 80% of the targeted people watched & joined the rally.
2. 75% of household head got information about gas wastage.
3. Promotional campaign carried out.
4. 65% of maid servants got to know that gas would not be as
available as now in the future if we do not stop wastage of gas now.
5. 50% of manual furnace users lit off the furnace after usage by
using one single matchstick.
6. 80% licensed drivers joined on the training.
7. People become more health conscious.

12. LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS MATRIX
(CONT.)
MOV Risks & Assumptions
Goals Baseline, follow up & impact
surveys
Monitoring proves to be an
effective tool.
Purpose Interviews & surveys Increased efficiency, reduced
system loss & proper monitoring
by Titas gas.
Outputs Surveys, monitoring report 1. Targeted people were helpful &
understanding.
2. Responsible female members of
households.
3. Heaters used during the winter
season.
4. Car owners were very co-
operated.

13. MAN POWER
Position Number Period
(Months)
Salary (Taka)
Project
Manager
1 12 25,000
Trainer 6 1 18,000
Project
officer
3 12 24,000
Monitoring
officer
2 12 22,000
Accounts
officer
2 12 20,000
Program
organizer
10 6 30,000
Total 24 55 1,39,000

14. BUDGET
Items Total (Taka)
Procurement 86,000
Office rent 35,000
Transport 15,000
Salaries 1,39,000
Overhead costs 4,500
Utilities 4,000
Miscellaneous 2,000
Evaluation 13,000
Dissemination 9,000
Total 2,77,500

15. TIMELINE
Activities Jan, 16 Feb, 16 Mar, 16 April, 16 May, 16 June, 16 July, 16 Aug, 16 Sep, 16 Oct, 16 Nov, 16 Dec, 16
Project proposal
preperation and
agreement sign
Hire office spaces, buy
furnitures, equipments
Recruit and train
project stuffs
Design training and
other activities
Set rally, develop
posters and leaflet
Provide trainings and
expose documentary
videos
Mid-term review
Activities continues