A short presentation on the concept of PMSCs in IHL and ICL, with focus on possible individual and collective civil and criminal responsibility for violations of international law by them.
CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF PRIVATE MILITARY AND SECURITY CONTRACTORS
1. Criminal and Civil Liability under IHL.
PRIVATE MILITARY AND SECURITY
COMPANIES (PMSCS)
2. INTRODUCTION
• What are PMSCs?
• PMSCs under Int’l Humanitarian Law.
• The Montreux Document.
• Criminal liability under IHL.
• Civil liability of PMSCs.
• Recommendations/Suggestions
• Questions.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
3. WHAT ARE PMSCS?
• No precise definition under IHL yet.
• Montreux Document: “PMSCs are private business
entities that provide military and/or security services,
irrespective of how they describe themselves.”
• EXAMPLES:
• Executive Outcomes in the Angolan War;
• Blackwater (now Academi) in the Iraq War.
• G4S Government Solutions for the UN and NATO
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
4. PMSCS UNDER IHL: LEGALITY
• Initially thought as mercenaries who are
illegal under IHL. Offered no protection
(Art. 47 of AP1) Outlawed under UN Int’l
Convention against Recruitment, Use,
Financing & Training of Mercenaries.
• But do they reach the standard set
under Art. 47?
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
5. PMSCS UNDER IHL: STATUS
• Determined on a case-by-case basis.
(Combatant/civilian)
• Civilians: If not directly participating in
hostilities (Art. 51(3) AP1). Not to be
targeted and have protection under GC4
• Combatants: Will receive protection of
GC1,2 or 3. Has PoW status when captured,
liable for violations of IHL.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
6. THE MONTREUX DOCUMENT.
• Non-binding, sponsored by 17 States. (Now
at 49 States and 3 Int’l Organizations)
• Reaffirms legal principles applicable, that
States are obligated to abide by.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
7. CRIMINAL LIABILITY UNDER IHL
• States are responsible for acts of private
firms/individuals used by the armed forces to
accomplish tasks that are typically for the armed
forces e.g. PMSCs
• Attributability: ILC Articles on Responsibility of States
for Internationally Wrongful Acts.
• Art. 8 Acting under instruction, direction/control
of State
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
8. CRIMINAL LIABILITY
• Grave breaches: willful killing, torture or
inhuman treatment, including biological
experiments, willfully causing great suffering
or serious injury to body or health (War
crimes)
• National jurisdiction: as recommended by
Montreux Document.
• Articles 6, 7, 8 of Rome Statute: may be
prosecuted.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
9. CIVIL LIABILITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
• The body corporate itself.
The Krupp Trial and I.G Farben case at the
Nuremberg Military Tribunals.
• Vicarious liability: responsible for the acts of one’s
employees.
Al-Shimari v CACI International: 4 Iraqi civilians,
tortured while at Abu Ghraib.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
10. CIVIL LIABILITY CONTD.
• Reparations: “A belligerent party which violates the
provisions...shall, be liable to pay compensation, be
responsible for all acts committed by armed forces.” –
Art. 3 Hague Convention IV of 1907
Art. 34 of Articles on State Responsibility
• Restitution – Restore previous conditions.
• Compensation, for any financially assessable
damage
• Satisfaction: includes formal apology,
acknowledgement of breach, expression of regret.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
11. RECOMMENDATIONS
• Company responsibility:
• Stringent vetting of personnel
• Proper training, reevaluation of staff on IHL
• Internal disciplinary procedure.
• Standard operating procedure, within
confines of IHL.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
12. RECOMMENDATIONS.
• Contracting State:
• Must not contract for purposes explicitly assigned
to armed forces
• Incorporation of code of conduct (e.g. ICoC) into
procurement policy.
• Measures to suppress violations: judicial,
administrative or military regulations.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
13. RECOMMENDATIONS.
• Territorial State:
• Disseminate IHL
• Measures to suppress violations: judicial,
administrative or military regulations.
• Limited to areas where control is exercised
(if occupied territory).
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
14. RECOMMENDATIONS
• Self-regulation?
There’s an ardent push for it, but given gravity of
armed conflict, this is not a mere corporate
situation.
• British Association of Private Security Companies
(BAPSC)
• International Stability Operations Association
(ISOA)
The International Code of Conduct for Private
Security Providers (ICoC) – acts supplementary to
Montreux Document.
MUTUGI MUTEGI, 2014
Strict criteria under Article 47 must ALL be met.
UN treaty has low support among countries that use PMSCs so…but mercenary still entitled to proper detention facility and fair trial.
Matters of civilians taking a direct part in hostilities: have regard to Interpretive Guidance by ICRC. Such direct participation includes: gathering military intel, operating weapons systems, protecting military bases from attack.
As regards combatants, is easier to tell when the PMSC is incorporated into the armed forces themselves.
Blackwater: case against them in dismissed on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct
A wrong, damage, causal link between the two
Trial of Alfried Felix Alwyn Krupp von
Bohlen und Halbach and Eleven Others, US Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 August 1947–29 July 1948,
Law Reports of the Trials of War Criminals, Vol. X, pp. 69–181
CACI participated directly and through a conspiracy in committing war-crimes while interrogating.
ICoC is soft law
in Switzerland in November 2010. At that time, a signing ceremony was held, and the ICoC was accepted by 58 private security companies from fifteen countries,
404 companies from 57 different countries have signed the ICoC. – July 2012.