This document discusses renewable energy models for utilizing rice residues in Vietnam. It presents three models: (1) a straw baling system to collect and compact rice straw for transportation and uses such as animal feed and mushroom production, (2) a rice husk briquetting system to convert husks into fuel briquettes for uses like cooking and reducing open burning, and (3) a rice husk gasifier stove that uses gasified husk for cooking while producing biochar as a byproduct. The models provide environmental and economic benefits but also face technical, implementation, and scaling challenges. Overall, the document argues that the renewable energy models show economic viability and should be integrated into government policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
Renewable energy models for rice residues - SNV Vietnam
1. Renewable energy models for rice residues -
Potentials for Green Growth and Experience
through SSC project by SNV
Forum
Green growth in Agriculture:
Potentials, Experience and Recommendations
Do Duc Tuong
Renewable Energy Advisor
tdo@snvworld.org
Hanoi, 31st October 2014
3. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Climate Change – What we see?
Sea level rise
3
Drought
Flood
4. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Climate Change - Causes
ƩCO2
Global
Warming
Climate
Change
The main cause of climate change and global warming is the
emission of Carbon dioxide (CO2) and other GHGs
6. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Vietnam National GHG inventory for 2010
6
Energy
141,171 mil. tons
(53.06%)
Agriculture
88,355 mil. tons
(33.21%)
Industrial
Processes
21,172 mil. tons
(7.96%)
Waste
15,352 mil.tons
(5.77%)
Source: “Capacity building for National GHG inventory in
Vietnam MONRE/JICA (2010-2014), draft report May-2014)
7. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Based on the Decision 403/QĐ-TTg dated 20/3/2014 on National Action plans for green
growth to 2020 (2014-2020)
7
8. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
GHG Emission plan for Agriculture by 2020 – MARD
8
Based on the Decision 319/QĐ-BNN-KHCN dated 16 Dec 2011 on GHG Emission
reduction plan for Agriculture 2020
9. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Vietnam is the 2nd largest rice exporter in the world,
producing each year more than 40 mil. tons of rice
Farming areas and Productivity of paddy rice from 2000-2010
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
9
Title
0
78
77
76
75
74
73
72
71
70
69
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Production
(Mil. Tons)
Farming area
(1000 ha)
Farming area Production
Source: GSO, 2010
9
10. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Annually, 32 million tons of rice residues is produced
32 mil. tons
of rice straw
10
11. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Milling sector produces 8 million tons of rice husk/year
8 mil. tons
of rice husk
11
12. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
What do farmers do with
such abundant biomass
12
resources?
13. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
13
Rice husk and rice straw are not useTdi tfoler cooking
14. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
1 hour of cooking tin such condition is polluted
equivalent to smoking 400 cigarettes
Because low bulk density fuels with traditional stoves create a
14
Title
polluted, uncomfortable environment for cooking
15. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
15
Title
That’s why rice straw burning became popular practice
16. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Open straw burning causes:
- Road accidents
- Polluted environment for local communities
17. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Dumping of rice husk also causes:
- Polluted energy sources
- Stuck rivers and channels
- Polluted environment for communities
Open burning of husk at big mill in
Le Thuy, Quang Binh June 2013
Dumping husk in Mekong delta
few years ago
17
18. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
18
On the other hand…
As a result of the rapid economic development, the
primary energy consumption in Vietnam has been
increasing steadily.
It is forecasted that Vietnam will likely become an
energy importer by 2015, expecting to increase its
energy demand 4 times by 2030.
19. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Energy balance of Vietnam to 2030
19
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Energy
shortage
1990 2000 2005 2009 2015 2020 2030
(Mtoe)
Coal Oil
Natural Gas Hydro
Nuclear Biomass
Total primary supply (TPS)
Source: Do Duc Tuong (2012), from complied difference sources
20. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Two questions worth to answer:
1. How to reduce GHG emission in rice
20
sector?
2. How to increase renewable energy
supply to increase energy security for
Vietnam?
One answer
Converting rice residues to
renewable energy !
21. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Example 1. Rice straw thermal power plant in China
First thermal power plant run on 100% straw
Capacity: 150MW (150000 kW)
Straw use: 220.000 tonnes/year
Electricity prod.: 1.9 billion kWh/year
Source: Prof. Cheng Xu, CAU
21
1ha straw ~ 6000kWh
(powering 60 homes for 1 month)
22. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Example 2. Straw thermal power plant in Denmark
• Straw is baled and co-fired in coal power plants in Denmark
23. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Example 3. Off-grid rice husk power plant in India
• Produce electricity from gasification of rice husk
• Use 300kg husk/hour to power 500 homes (6 hours/day)
23
Title
24. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
24
RE models introduced by SNV in SSC project
25. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
25
Model 1. Straw baling system
Title
26. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 1. Straw baling system
1 person can collect 8 tonnes of straw/day
Capacity = 500 bales/day (~2ha)
27. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 1. Straw baling system
Convenient for handling, transportation, and storage
27
This mini truck is loading 1 tonne of straw
28. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 1. Straw baling system
Convenient for handling, transportation, and storage
Straw becomes a commercial product
31. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
• 1st installation: The Husbandry Breeding Centre in Quang Binh
• 2nd installation: Phước Hưng cooperative, Tuy Phuoc, Binh Định
Bố Trạch, Quảng Bình
Tháng 5/2014
Model 1. Straw baling – Results
32. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
32
Model 1. Straw baling – Results
Technical training at Dai Trach commune, Quang Binh
33. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 1. Straw baling – Results
Using straw bales in Quang Binh (demo only)
Rơm cuộn - Làm thức ăn cho trâu bò
34. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Straw bale is used for mushroom production in Binh Dinh
34
Mushroom yeilds
increased 30% compared
to hand-cut straw
An Nhơn, Bình Định
July 2014
Model 1. Straw baling – Results
35. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 2. Rice husk briquette system
Principle: Rice husk is converted to briquette through
a press-crew system with heater, briquette is used as fuel
36. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 2. Rice husk briquette system
Environmental benefits:
• Reduced open-burning of excess husk in big rice mills
• Use briquette to replace coal and other fossil fuels
37. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
37
Model 2. Rice husk briquette system
High energy density
Low dust
Longer burning time
Much cheaper than charcoal and hard coal
38. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Ms.Tran Thi Quynh rice mill
(briquette machines operated from July 2014)
Produced: 110 tonnes briquette
Revenue: 130 million VNĐ
Profit: 10 million VNĐ/month
New jobs: 3 local jobs
38
Model 2. Rice husk briquette system - Results
40. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
40
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove + biochar
Gasification is the process that converts solid biomass into
combustible gases that could be conveniently used as clean fuel
for heat and electricity generation later
Direct combustion Gasification
Primary air Secondary air
41. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove – WHY?
3 billion people are relying on tradditional biomass stoves
4 million people died each year due to indoor air pollution
(Source: WHO, 2014)
42. This woman in Quang Hoa village.
She cooked in such polluted
kitchen for most of her life
43. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
TRADDITIONAL COOKSTOVES
= CHEAP FUELS
+ SMOKE, DUST, POLLUTANTS
+ INCONVENIENT
+ LONG COOKING TIME
+ LABOR-INTENSIVE FOR
COLLECTING FUELS
43
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove – WHY?
45. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove – WHY?
LPG STOVES= CLEAN+ COMFORT
(but…. )
+ HIGH COST
+ CO2 EMISSION
45
46. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove – WHY?
Rice husk gasifier stove provides Clean cooking and Biochar
46
47. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove – WHY?
• Biochar as by-product from rice husk gasifier stove
47
48. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove – WHY?
Not use biochar Biochar applied
Source: Josiah Hunt, The Basics of Biochar : A Natural Soil Amendment
48
49. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove – WHY?
Burning Burning
CO2
Natural growth and decay
of plants (incl. burning)
Biomass
(living and death)
is carbon neutral:
C=
100 million years
( C- )
100 minutes ( C- )
Fossil fuels Bio-coal
Used as soil
amendment
200+ years of fossil fuels,
positive carbon emission:
C+
Carbon storage:
Negative Carbon: C-Biochar
into soil C-Carbon
storage for thousand years
49
Source: Dr. Paul Anderson et al.
50. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove - Results
Lab testing of different gasifier stoves in Vietnam
50
Source: Do Duc Tuong, 2012
51. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
User preference workshops in Quang Binh and Binh Dinh
51
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove - Results
52. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Improvement and 3D designs for newly improved stove
52
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove - Results
53. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Mass-production of improved gasifier stove
53
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove - Results
54. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
54
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove - Results
High quality of production with modern machines
55. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
55
Model 3. Rice husk gasifier stove - Results
Improved gasifier stoves are produced
56. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
The new improved gasifier stove - finish product
Some features
• Long lifespan: up to 18 months
• Cooking time: 40-50mins
• Fuel use: 1.4kg/batch
• Inner combustion chamber is
replaceable, 1 year guarantee
• Better fan performance,
6months guarantee
56
57. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
The new improved gasifier stove - finish product
57
Developing a brand name for the improved stove
58. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
The new improved gasifier stove - finish product
58
Setting up local shops and distribution network
1
2
3
62. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Technical Challenges
• Rice husk briquette machines require daily maintenance
• Straw baling machine requires pulling tractor
• Gasifier stove requires high quality material + precise
manufacturing equipment
• Stove fan need electrician to repair
• GHG emission reduction for each model requires is
complicated. It must take into account lifecycle emission
(e.g: straw baling = diesel for machine, transportation, emission
during mushroom cultivation or CH4 in animal raising…)
62
63. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Implementation challenges
• Select suitable beneficiary (preferably private)
• Seek local co-funding from local government
• Technical training and technology transfer
should be smart and effective
• Should support business development +
finding customers in first stage (create market)
• Capacity building (local gov leaders) and
awareness raising for local community
63
64. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Scaling up Challenges
• Farming area or milling scale should be large enough
• Regional geographical/farming characteristics should be
considered (seasons, land condition…)
• Competition of resources (straw/husk in other uses)
• A must-do is to change local habits (field burning, straw
bale uses, biochar uses, briquette uses…)
64
65. Overview | Problems | Re. Energy models | Challenges | Conclusion
Conclusion
• It is clearly seen that the RE-models are economically
feasible (economic GROWTH)
• Intensive baseline survey is required
• RE-models should be mainstreamed into Government
policies to seek inclusive support and strong funding
(The National Program on New Rural Development,
Large-scale fields…)
• In-depth GHG emission reduction assessment should be
carried (how GREEN?)
65