OSMC 2022 | Let’s build a private cloud – how hard can it be? by Kevin Honka

2
Who am I?
●
Kevin Honka
●
Senior System Engineer at AD IT Systems
●
Twitter: @piratehonk
●
Mastodon: @piratehonk@norden.social
●
Mail: kevin (at) honka.dev

3
Roadmap
●
What is a private cloud
●
How does one build it
●
Pros / Cons
●
Monitoring
●
Difficulties

4
What is a private cloud?
●
Similar to
– Google cloud
– AWS
– Azure
●
But on our own hardware

5
What is a private cloud?
●
KVM on steroids
●
Loads of services
●
Lots of Infrastructure automation
●
Kept together by tears and duct tape

6
Building a cloud
●
Commercial
– VMWare
– Nutanix
– Red Hat Openstack / Openshift
– Mirantis Openstack
– Nebula

7
Building a cloud
●
Non Commercial
– Apache Mesos
– Openstack Foundation

8
Building a cloud
●
Manpower
●
Money
●
Time
●
Knowledge
●
Scale

9
Building a cloud
●
Openstack
– SDN
– Easily scalable
– Good documentation
– External support available from multiple companies

10
Building a cloud
●
Minimum of 3 nodes
●
Split control, network, storage, compute
●
Scale later when necessary

11
Building a cloud
●
3 high performance servers for Openstack
– Dedicated Fiber Channel
– Dual sockets with high core CPUs
– All RAM slots occupied for optimal usage
●
4 high I/O servers for Ceph
– Dedicated Fiber Channel
– Single socket with medium cpu
– Nvme SSDs for Storage

12
Building a cloud
●
4 Node Ceph cluster with default settings
– Setup using cephadm
●
3 Node Openstack cluster
– 1 Control/Network Node
– 2 Compute Nodes
●
setup with kolla-ansible
– A single run takes around 30 – 60 Minutes

13
Building a cloud
●
kolla-ansible
– Modifed ansible
– Runs on a single YAML File

16
Pros
●
Good documentation
●
Highly customizable
●
Control over all services
●
Great for learning new things
– Kvm
– Linux Storage handling
– Networking

17
Cons
●
Steep learning curve
– Kvm
– Networking
– Openstack services
– Integration in existing environments
●
Overspecific documentation
●
Takes a long time to mvp

18
Monitoring
●
Prometheus
– Exporter for most services
– Predefined alert rules available
●
Graylog
– Log collection via nxlog
– Processing for data extraction

19
Monitoring
●
Many different formats
– Json
– Classic system logging
– Custom logging setups
– Multi line logs

20
Placement logs
●
2022-11-09 10:03:15.070 25 INFO placement.requestlog [req-6e970f73-e493-4418-ad9c-25b7ff34ba57
ba26e9e5beaa41018db4a3e00c6e7ef9 9abdc13c709a42949a985af187d64a4b - default default] 10.XX.XX.XX "GET
/resource_providers/480ccd47-c2c0-4a49-8972-b1486598f6e9/allocations" status: 200 len: 575 microversion: 1.0
●
2022-11-09 10:03:15.097 24 INFO placement.requestlog [req-d1118868-c205-4b38-8567-eb1c7db17811
/resource_providers?in_tree=480ccd47-c2c0-4a49-8972-b1486598f6e9" status: 200 len: 817 microversion: 1.14
●
2022-11-09 10:03:15.123 22 INFO placement.requestlog [req-e77ad21e-ead7-4b5e-9e03-b3350b188234
/resource_providers/480ccd47-c2c0-4a49-8972-b1486598f6e9/inventories" status: 200 len: 410 microversion: 1.0
●
2022-11-09 10:03:15.143 23 INFO placement.requestlog [req-7e8f0090-69f7-4b5c-b63d-6d8aeffa6312
/resource_providers/480ccd47-c2c0-4a49-8972-b1486598f6e9/aggregates" status: 200 len: 54 microversion: 1.19
●
2022-11-09 10:03:15.178 21 INFO placement.requestlog [req-416b2d05-eebc-4fac-b75d-10c02c7df252
/resource_providers/480ccd47-c2c0-4a49-8972-b1486598f6e9/traits" status: 200 len: 1593 microversion: 1.6

21
Placement logs
●
2022-11-09 10:03:15.070 25 INFO placement.requestlog
[req-6e970f73-e493-4418-ad9c-25b7ff34ba57
ba26e9e5beaa41018db4a3e00c6e7ef9
9abdc13c709a42949a985af187d64a4b - default default]
10.XX.XX.XX "GET /resource_providers/480ccd47-c2c0-4a49-
8972-b1486598f6e9/allocations" status: 200 len: 575
microversion: 1.0

22
Log components
●
Time: 2022-11-09 10:03:15.070
●
Loglevel: INFO
●
Origin: 10.XX.XX.XX
●
HTTP Method: GET
●
URL: /resource_providers/480ccd47-c2c0-4a49-8972-
b1486598f6e9/allocations
●
HTTP Status: “status: 200”

23
Tracing
●
Request ID: req-6e970f73-e493-4418-ad9c-25b7ff34ba57
●
Other Identifiers:
– Ba26e9e5beaa41018db4a3e00c6e7ef9
– 9abdc13c709a42949a985af187d64a4b
●
Random data: default default

24
Difficulties
●
Slow Interface / API
●
Performance inconsistencies in VM
●
Bad I/O

25
●
Long loading times
●
Sometimes timeouts

26
●
Why is this happening?
●
How do we resolve this?

27
●
Understanding how the Services work
●
Which way do requests take?

30
●
– Too many connections via HAProxy
●
A single request can generate up to 500-2000 internal requests
●
How do we resolve this?
– Use HAProxy only for incomming requests
– Remove HAProxy completely

31
●
Use HAProxy only for incomming requests
– Minimal impact
– Easy to configure
●
Remove HAProxy completely
– Loss of high availability
– One less service to worry about

32
●
Monitoring takeaways
– Check logs for dropped connections
– Monitor open tcp connections and times of the linux kernel

33
Performance inconsistencies
●
I/O Wait
●
CPU lag

34
●
– Problem with KVM?
– Hardware issues?
– Something with the Network?
– Ceph Issues?

35

36
●
No progress after a week of debugging
●
A hint from @isotopp@chaos.social
– Old story about a MySQL DB
– Something about Numa swapping

37
●
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-31,64-95
●
NUMA node1 CPU(s): 32-63,96-127

41
Numaswapping
●
KVM Processes jump between Cores
●
On Socket change, Memory is behind a different CPU
– Increased memory access time
– Slower PCIe access

42
●
Activate CPU pinning
– CPU cores will be exclusive to a single KVM Thread
– Less available resources on compute nodes
– Need more compute nodes for same amount of VMs
●
Run KVM NUMA aware
– KVM Threads will always run on the same NUMA Node
– No exclusive cores

43
●
– Impossible to monitor
●
Intel Resource Director Technology can help
– Not available on AMD systems

44
Bad I/O
●
Ceph RDB volumes for VMs
●
Causes?
– Network?
– Wrong configuration?
– Hardware limits?

45
Bad I/O
●
Symptoms
– Slow writes; less than 300 op/s
– Inconsistent reads; fluctuating between 20k and 20 op/s
– Slow commits; more than 50 msec

46
Bad I/O
●
Searching for a solution
– Many tipps for optimizations
●
Stabilized I/O but did not increase it to estimated levels
– Estimation
●
NVMe SSDs
●
Atleast 100k op/s
●
Fast commit to disk; less than 500 usec

47
Bad I/O
●
Searching for a solution
– Network works at peak, with 20GBps
– Hardware resources are hardly touched
– Possible Problem with Ceph?
●
Nothing in the documentation
●
No recommendations
– Accept it as fate and move to local storage?

48
Bad I/O
●
A random link to a ceph mailing list
– OSDs should be at a max of 1TB
else performance will be poor

49
Bad I/O
●
Reconfiguring the ceph cluster to OSDs with a max size of
1TB
– OSDs increase from 20 to 60
– Each OSD gets it’s own core
●
No NUMA swapping
– Each SSD contains 3 OSDs

50
Bad I/O
●
Success?
– Partially
– I/O Performance
●
Commit down to 40 µsec
●
Consistent 15k+ op/s
– Could be better could be worse

51
Bad I/O
●
Monitoring takeaway
– Collect the metrics from libvirt
– Plotting graphs can actually help here

53
●
Use existing Tools
– Prometheus exporter
●
Openstack
●
Ceph
●
Visualize everything!
– Use existing Dashboards and customize

54
What happened since then?
●
Implementation of Prometheus for all Services and
Servers
●
Grafana Dashboards for everything important
●
Custom alert rules based on aggregated metrics

OSMC 2022 | Let’s build a private cloud – how hard can it be? by Kevin Honka

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a OSMC 2022 | Let’s build a private cloud – how hard can it be? by Kevin Honka

Similar a OSMC 2022 | Let’s build a private cloud – how hard can it be? by Kevin Honka (20)

Último

Último (20)

OSMC 2022 | Let’s build a private cloud – how hard can it be? by Kevin Honka