SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 45
Unique and Valuable Services Provided
         by Support Groups
 – An information source that is completely free of
   conflict of interest, an open marketplace for
   information about all available treatment options
 – An opportunity to meet others who have already
   “been through the process”
 – Venue for accessing information about local
   doctors from men with first hand experience
Program Goals
1. Know all the treatment options that are available and
   the side effects they can cause
2. Understand how to accurately place individuals into
   the correct category or stage of prostate cancer
   including a working knowledge of imaging and
   pathology
3. Know the roles of the different medical specialists
4. Be familiar with basics of men’s health and commonly
   used pharmaceuticals and supplements
5. Know the standards for screening & biopsy
Mentor’s Class Curriculum

1. Landscape I (Kirk)       7. Imaging (Margolis)

2. Landscape II (Scholz)    8. Low-Risk (Klotz)

3. Men’s Health (Moyad)     9. Intermediate (Scholz)

4. Side Effects (Mulhall)   10. High-Risk (Blasko)

5. Screen/Biopsy (Scholz)   11. PSA Relapse (Myers)

6. Medications (Moyad)      12. Advanced (Lam)
Privileged Role of Group Leaders

– Have the opportunity to share intimately in the
  lives of others at their most challenging hour

– Are privileged to be an unbiased source providing
  valuable information that will be potentially life
  changing
Proper Character of Leaders
– Constantly developing in the humble skill of
  imparting useful information to frightened and ill-
  informed people
   • Be sensitive to the fact that frightened people have
     trouble concentrating and learning. Remember, “Fear
     can’t hear.”
   • Be sensitive to the fact that imparting knowledge
     places you in a powerful position. Use the power
     wisely by being gentle and patient
Burden of Support Group Leaders
• Valuable and accurate information may be
  disregarded simply because you don’t have a
  degree.
• The fact that information is provided without
  cost may cause some to make the mistake of
  valuing it accordingly.
• Conflicts of interest are so prevalent in this
  arena that some people will still suspect you
  have a hidden agenda.
Burden of Support Group Leaders
• Some people will mistakenly assume that your
  reticence to make concrete recommendations
  is due to your lack of knowledge
• Dealing with people who are convinced they
  already know the answers will be much more
  challenging than teaching beginners who are
  still open to learning
The Risk of Being Ignorant, Reliance on a
          Single Source of Information

– Under treatment
  • Early mortality from improperly treated prostate
    cancer
  • Suffering the side effects of treatment for a cancer that
    would not have relapsed if initial treatment was proper
– Over treatment
  • Ignoring health issues unrelated to prostate cancer that
    are likely to impair survival anyway
  • Failing to balance the side effects of treatment with
    their impact on quality of life
Providing Information with Perspective

– There are huge amounts of information on the
  internet. However, information alone is useless
  without perspective.
– Information about a treatment is only useful when
  placed in perspective with:
   • The individual’s
       – Category of prostate cancer
       – Age and health status
       – Personal goals and quality of life priorities
   • How each treatment compares with the other alternatives
       – Comparisons are only possible by considering all the options
Categories of Prostate Cancer

– Newly diagnosed
  • Low-Risk
  • Intermediate-Risk
  • High-Risk
– PSA Relapse
– Advanced disease
Newly Diagnosed
– Low-Risk
  • Gleason < 7
  • PSA < 10
  • Small or absent nodule on digital rectal
– Intermediate-Risk
  • Gleason 7 or PSA 10-20 or larger nodule on digital rectal
– High-Risk
  • PSA > 20 or Gleason>7 or two or more Intermediate-Risk
    factors or a nodule through capsule
10-Year Survival by Risk Category

Low-Risk     More than 100%
                 Brenner: Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005

Intermediate With treatment 98%
                 Mayo Clinic Journal of Urology 2008

High-Risk    Surgery 95%
                 Mayo Clinic Journal of Urology 2008
“Gleason” Grading of Prostate Cancer




•   Low grade (3)
•   Higher Grade (4)
•   Highest Grade (5)
•   Score = “Adding Up”
    two grades
Newly-Diagnosed: Treatment Options
•   Active Surveillance
•   Brachytherapy
•   IMRT
•   Testosterone Deprivation
•   Cryotherapy
•   HIFU
•   Surgery
Surgery
– Robotic
   • Very dependent on operator quality like any prostate surgery
   • When compared to the open approach;
      –   Cure rates equivalent to open technology
      –   Shorter hospital stays and quicker recovery
      –   Much smaller scars
      –   Equivalent risks of impotence and incontinence
– Open
   • Certain famous practitioners contend that the open approach is
     advantageous because they can “feel” the tumor and adjust
     their margins accordingly.
   • There is some evidence that positive margins are a little more
     common with the robotic approach
Robotic Prostatectomy
            Surgeon operates at the
             console within a 3D view
            Bedside surgical assistant
             is next to the patient
            Instruments move like a
             human wrist (↑ dexterity
             and precision)
Differences in Surgical Scars


                     Little scars
Big Scar




  Standard Surgery       Robotic Surgery
Surgery
• Advantages
  – More precise staging and estimates of relapse risk
    compared to the other options
  – Easier to do PSA monitoring to detect early relapse
• Disadvantages
  – Higher risk of impotence and incontinence compared to
    the other options (except cryotherapy)
  – Higher risk of requiring further therapy such as
    radiation and/or hormone (due to positive margins)
  – Anesthesia risks such as heart attacks and short term
    memory loss
Impotence Five Years after Surgery: 1288 Men
           David Penson Journal of Urology 2005



• Incapable of an erection adequate for
  intercourse even with Viagra
    Age < 54             39%
    55-59                51%
    60-64                56%
    > 65                 82%
Incontinence Rates with the Best

               Surgeon       12 mo

    Pat Walsh    (Open)      93%

    Ahlering     (Robotic)   94%

    Shalhav      (Robotic)   84%

    Lee          (Robotic)   90%
“Optimal Surgical Competency Requires a
    minimum of 250 Practice Cases”

• In the New York during the whole of the year
  in 2005:
  – 25% of the urologists did a single radical
    prostectomy
  – 80% of the urologists did <10 cases


  Savage & Vickers, Memorial Sloan Kettering
  Journal of Urology December 2009
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)

   – Advantages
      • Substantially lower risk of impotence and incontinence
        compared to surgery
      • Cure rates at least as good as surgery and possibly better
   – Disadvantages
      • PSA monitoring after treatment is more ambiguous than
        with surgery
      • Small but real risk(1/50?) of a non-healing rectal burn
   – Proton Therapy
      • Same as IMRT in all regards except may possibly have a
        slightly higher risk of non-healing rectal burn than IMRT
Active Surveillance
– Advantages
  • Vastly lower risk of immediate side effects
– Disadvantages
  • Prostate biopsy after a year. Every 2-3 years thereafter
  • 5 alpha reductase inhibitors are occasionally employed
    and may affect sex drive
  • Cancer growing more rapidly than anticipated could
    necessitate increased treatment (hormones plus
    radiation instead of radiation alone?) than what would
    have been necessary at initial time of diagnosis
Cryotherapy
– Total Cryotherapy
   • Advantages
      – Shorter treatment course than IMRT
   • Disadvantages
      – Highest incidence of impotence
      – Incontinence rates comparable to surgery
– Focal Cryotherapy
      – Still investigational
      – Much lower rate of impotence and incontinence
      – Only for carefully selected candidates
Hormone Therapy
– Advantages
  • Reversible side effect
  • Total body anti-cancer effect
  • Enhanced surgery and radiation cure rates
– Disadvantages
  • Side effects impact the whole body
  • Controls, but rarely cures the disease
Brachytherapy
– Permanent Seeds
  • Advantages
     – Convenient outpatient administration
  • Disadvantages
     – Not appropriate for prostate size > 60cc
     – Not appropriate for men with preexisting urinary issues
– Temporary Seeds
  • Advantages
     – Can cover outside the prostate in seminal vesicles
  • Disadvantages
     – Involves one or two hospitalizations for a couple days
Implant Procedure
X-Ray of Seed Implant
HIFU
– Total HIFU
   • Advantages
      – Outpatient treatment given in a single procedure
   • Disadvantages
      –   TURP required for treatment of larger glands
      –   Cure rates may be inferior to other options
      –   Only available outside the country
      –   Expensive
– Focal HIFU
      – Still investigational
      – Much lower rate of impotence and incontinence
      – Only for carefully selected candidates
Treatment Selection Flow Chart

                            Active Surveillance
            Low-Risk



Determine
                               Seeds or IMRT or Cryotherapy or
 Disease     Intermediate          Surgery or Hormones or
   Risk                         Active Surveillance or HIFU or
                              IMRT plus Short-Term Hormones


             High-Risk
                            Long-Term Hormones plus
                             IMRT plus Brachytherapy
PSA Relapse
• Higher-Risk
   –   Newly-diagnosed risk category was high
   –   Early relapse (<2 years)
   –   Fast PSA doubling of less than 6-8 months
   –   Younger age
• Lower-Risk
   –   Newly-diagnosed risk category was low
   –   Delayed relapse more than 2 yrs after local treatment
   –   PSA doubling > 12 months
   –   Older age
PSA Relapsed Prostate Cancer
    Cancer Type         Life Expectancy after Relapse

•   Pancreatic cancer        4 months
•   Kidney cancer            6 months
•   Stomach cancer           8 months
•   Lung cancer              12 months
•   Prostate cancer          160 months
PSA Relapse—Treatment Options
 – Cryotherapy (after radiation)
 – Hormone therapy
    • Continuous
    • Intermittent
    • Antiandrogen monotherapy
 – Observation
 – Immune therapy such as Leukine
 – Radiation (after surgery, cryo, hormones or HIFU)
    • Fossa
    • Nodes
    • Nodes and fossa
Treatment Selection Flow Chart
                            1.   Observation vs.
              Lower Risk    2.   Radiation to fossa vs.
                            3.   Cryotherapy to prostate vs.
                            4.   Intermittent Hormones

PSA Relapse




                            Radiation or Cryo to fossa plus
              Higher Risk
                            Radiation to pelvic nodes plus
                            Hormone therapy (Plue
Advanced Disease

• Hormone resistance defined as a rising PSA
  with testosterone less than 50 or
• A PSA over 100 or
• Proven metastatic cancer outside the lymph
  nodes of the pelvis
Advanced Disease—Lower Risk

– Metastases but still hormone sensitive
– Lower PSA levels and slower rate of rise
– Relatively few bone metastases
– Disease limited to lymph nodes
– Not resistant to multiple treatments
– No detectable circulating tumor cells
Advanced Disease—Higher Risk

– Faster rate of PSA rise
– High levels of circulating tumor cells (CTC)
– More extensive bone metastases
– Bone pain
– Liver metastases
– Resistant to multiple treatments
Treatment Advanced Disease
• Bone
   – Xgeva, Zometa, Samarium, (AlphaRadin) & spot radiation
• Immune
   – Provenge
• Trials
   – TAK-700, Ipilimumab, XL-184, Curstersin & Prostavax,
• Chemo
   – Taxotere, Jevtana, Mitoxantrone, Carbo, Xeloda & Thalomid
• Hormonal
   – Bicalutamide, Nilutamide, Ketoconazole, Estrogen, Zytiga &
     (MDV-3100)
Treatment Selection
• Any Risk
  – Xgeva or Zometa monthly
• Lower Risk
  – Hormonal treatment
  – Provenge
  – Combinations of both
• Higher Risk
  – Chemotherapy
  – Hormonal
  – Combinations of both
Knowing When to Change Treatment

• After starting a new treatment monitor response
  closely for 90 days by checking:
  –   PSA, PAP, LDH, ALP every 2-4 weeks
  –   Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) monthly
  –   Bone scans CT, MRI and Pet scan every 3 to 6 months
  –   A reduction in pain is usually the first sign of a response
• Change treatment immediately if no response or if
  excessive side effects
General Principles
• Be nimble by checking disease status frequently
  and changing treatment right away when
  something is not working
• All other things being equal, starting treatment
  earlier is better than waiting
   – Less cancer to kill
   – Immune system is stronger
• Combination treatment is better than single
  agents as long as the side effects or the cost are
  not excessive
General Principles
• Physical fitness is totally critical
   – Testosterone is low
   – Age is advanced
   – Almost all the treatments cause fatigue
• Prostate cancer kills by weakening bone marrow
   – Use spot radiation and samarium sparingly
   – Use Aranesp (to reverse anemia)
   – Use Neulasta (to prevent infections while on chemo)
Conclusions #1
• Treatment selection is totally dependent on
  being assigned to the correct category
  – Newly-Diagnosed
     • Low, Intermediate & High Risk
  – PSA Relapse
     • Lower vs. Higher Risk
  – Advanced Disease
     • Lower vs. Higher Risk
Additional Conclusions
• Unawareness of a treatment option is identical to
  that treatment not existing
• Effective treatment administered early is superior
  to the exact same treatment administered late.
  So vigilant monitoring and detection of disease
  progression early is critical.
• Physical fitness is important all stages but is
  vitally important for men with advanced disease.

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine TherapyPOC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
rtp
 
Screening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostateScreening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostate
Prakash Hs
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Chemotherapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant ChemotherapyPOC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Chemotherapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Chemotherapy
rtp
 
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiPros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Kesho Conference
 
Breast Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Adjuvant ChemotherapyBreast Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Adjuvant Chemotherapy
fondas vakalis
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic DiseasePOC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
rtp
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Prostate Cancer Screening
Prostate Cancer ScreeningProstate Cancer Screening
Prostate Cancer Screening
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine TherapyPOC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
 
Screening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostateScreening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostate
 
Prostate Cancer Navigation
Prostate Cancer NavigationProstate Cancer Navigation
Prostate Cancer Navigation
 
Evolving recommendations in prostate cancer screening
Evolving recommendations in prostate cancer screeningEvolving recommendations in prostate cancer screening
Evolving recommendations in prostate cancer screening
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Chemotherapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant ChemotherapyPOC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Chemotherapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Chemotherapy
 
Follow up of prostatectomy versus
Follow up of prostatectomy versusFollow up of prostatectomy versus
Follow up of prostatectomy versus
 
Prostate
ProstateProstate
Prostate
 
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiPros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
 
PIVOT
PIVOTPIVOT
PIVOT
 
Breast Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Adjuvant ChemotherapyBreast Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Adjuvant Chemotherapy
 
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent AdvancesCarcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
 
Locally advanced Prostate Cancer
Locally advanced Prostate CancerLocally advanced Prostate Cancer
Locally advanced Prostate Cancer
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic DiseasePOC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
 
Prostate cancer , radiotherapy
Prostate cancer , radiotherapyProstate cancer , radiotherapy
Prostate cancer , radiotherapy
 
When Cancer Comes Back, Sarah Adams, MD
When Cancer Comes Back, Sarah Adams, MDWhen Cancer Comes Back, Sarah Adams, MD
When Cancer Comes Back, Sarah Adams, MD
 
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
Active Surveillance for Prostate CancerActive Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
 
Soft tissue sarcoma
Soft tissue sarcomaSoft tissue sarcoma
Soft tissue sarcoma
 
Newly Diagnosed, Stephanie Wethington, MD
Newly Diagnosed, Stephanie Wethington, MDNewly Diagnosed, Stephanie Wethington, MD
Newly Diagnosed, Stephanie Wethington, MD
 
Prolaris presentation in Greece 2014
Prolaris presentation in Greece 2014Prolaris presentation in Greece 2014
Prolaris presentation in Greece 2014
 

Destacado

Dia da Alimentação - Madalena Quitério
Dia da Alimentação - Madalena QuitérioDia da Alimentação - Madalena Quitério
Dia da Alimentação - Madalena Quitério
efaparaiso
 
Water Disaster
Water DisasterWater Disaster
Water Disaster
resumi2
 

Destacado (8)

Test de phill
Test de phillTest de phill
Test de phill
 
Dia da Alimentação - Madalena Quitério
Dia da Alimentação - Madalena QuitérioDia da Alimentação - Madalena Quitério
Dia da Alimentação - Madalena Quitério
 
Laws of success
Laws of successLaws of success
Laws of success
 
กำหนดการประชุมวิชาการเรื่อง แนวทางการวิจัยนาฎกรรม
กำหนดการประชุมวิชาการเรื่อง แนวทางการวิจัยนาฎกรรมกำหนดการประชุมวิชาการเรื่อง แนวทางการวิจัยนาฎกรรม
กำหนดการประชุมวิชาการเรื่อง แนวทางการวิจัยนาฎกรรม
 
Water Disaster
Water DisasterWater Disaster
Water Disaster
 
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการ สกสค.ให้ทุนอุดหนุนการวิจัยประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2557
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการ สกสค.ให้ทุนอุดหนุนการวิจัยประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2557สำนักงานคณะกรรมการ สกสค.ให้ทุนอุดหนุนการวิจัยประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2557
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการ สกสค.ให้ทุนอุดหนุนการวิจัยประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2557
 
Aula5 digitalização de objetos 3d para objectos 3d pessoas
Aula5 digitalização de objetos 3d para objectos 3d pessoasAula5 digitalização de objetos 3d para objectos 3d pessoas
Aula5 digitalização de objetos 3d para objectos 3d pessoas
 
Buscadores
BuscadoresBuscadores
Buscadores
 

Similar a Module 1 Tom Kirk-LandscapePart1

ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.pptca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
MusaibMushtaq
 
NSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trial
NSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trialNSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trial
NSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trial
Abrar Ahmed
 

Similar a Module 1 Tom Kirk-LandscapePart1 (20)

Module 2 Dr Scholz-LandscapePart2
Module 2 Dr Scholz-LandscapePart2Module 2 Dr Scholz-LandscapePart2
Module 2 Dr Scholz-LandscapePart2
 
Lines of ttt of p ca
Lines of ttt of p caLines of ttt of p ca
Lines of ttt of p ca
 
Surgery, radiation therapy or neither evolving approaches to prostate cance...
Surgery, radiation therapy or neither   evolving approaches to prostate cance...Surgery, radiation therapy or neither   evolving approaches to prostate cance...
Surgery, radiation therapy or neither evolving approaches to prostate cance...
 
Colorectal Cancer Risk & Risk Reduction: Jan 2017 #CRCWebinar
Colorectal Cancer Risk & Risk Reduction: Jan 2017 #CRCWebinarColorectal Cancer Risk & Risk Reduction: Jan 2017 #CRCWebinar
Colorectal Cancer Risk & Risk Reduction: Jan 2017 #CRCWebinar
 
Management of prostate cancer
Management of prostate cancerManagement of prostate cancer
Management of prostate cancer
 
Cancer Screening in adults original.pptx
Cancer Screening in adults original.pptxCancer Screening in adults original.pptx
Cancer Screening in adults original.pptx
 
WEBINAR: Breast Screening and Breast Density
WEBINAR: Breast Screening and Breast DensityWEBINAR: Breast Screening and Breast Density
WEBINAR: Breast Screening and Breast Density
 
Chapter 2.3 cancer screening
Chapter 2.3 cancer screeningChapter 2.3 cancer screening
Chapter 2.3 cancer screening
 
Ca cervix
Ca cervixCa cervix
Ca cervix
 
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.pptca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
 
Ca Prostate mgt.pptx
Ca Prostate mgt.pptxCa Prostate mgt.pptx
Ca Prostate mgt.pptx
 
Oncology Therapeutic Area Workshop
Oncology Therapeutic Area WorkshopOncology Therapeutic Area Workshop
Oncology Therapeutic Area Workshop
 
NSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trial
NSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trialNSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trial
NSABP B-21.pptx rtx vs tam landmark trial
 
Fertility And Pregnancy Outcome In Cancer Patients
Fertility And Pregnancy Outcome In Cancer PatientsFertility And Pregnancy Outcome In Cancer Patients
Fertility And Pregnancy Outcome In Cancer Patients
 
early cancer detection for malignant tumours .pptx
early cancer detection for malignant tumours .pptxearly cancer detection for malignant tumours .pptx
early cancer detection for malignant tumours .pptx
 
THYROID MALIGNANCIES.pptx
THYROID MALIGNANCIES.pptxTHYROID MALIGNANCIES.pptx
THYROID MALIGNANCIES.pptx
 
Prostate cancer Risk stratification and choice of initial treatment final.pptx
Prostate cancer Risk stratification and choice of initial treatment final.pptxProstate cancer Risk stratification and choice of initial treatment final.pptx
Prostate cancer Risk stratification and choice of initial treatment final.pptx
 
Protección Radiológica en Radiología Pediátrica
Protección Radiológica en Radiología PediátricaProtección Radiológica en Radiología Pediátrica
Protección Radiológica en Radiología Pediátrica
 
Pediatric Oncology & Unsung Heroes
Pediatric Oncology & Unsung HeroesPediatric Oncology & Unsung Heroes
Pediatric Oncology & Unsung Heroes
 
Ca endometrium-1.pptx
Ca endometrium-1.pptxCa endometrium-1.pptx
Ca endometrium-1.pptx
 

Más de PCRI_MentoringProgram

Más de PCRI_MentoringProgram (9)

Module 4 Dr Moyad-MensHealth
Module 4 Dr Moyad-MensHealthModule 4 Dr Moyad-MensHealth
Module 4 Dr Moyad-MensHealth
 
Module 5 Dr Scholz-Screening&Biopsy
Module 5 Dr Scholz-Screening&BiopsyModule 5 Dr Scholz-Screening&Biopsy
Module 5 Dr Scholz-Screening&Biopsy
 
Module 6 Dr Scholz-HormonalTherapies
Module 6 Dr Scholz-HormonalTherapiesModule 6 Dr Scholz-HormonalTherapies
Module 6 Dr Scholz-HormonalTherapies
 
Module 7 Dr Margolis-Mri&Imaging
Module 7 Dr Margolis-Mri&ImagingModule 7 Dr Margolis-Mri&Imaging
Module 7 Dr Margolis-Mri&Imaging
 
Module 8 Dr Klotz-LowRiskPC
Module 8 Dr Klotz-LowRiskPCModule 8 Dr Klotz-LowRiskPC
Module 8 Dr Klotz-LowRiskPC
 
Module 9 Dr Scholz-IntermediateRiskPC
Module 9 Dr Scholz-IntermediateRiskPCModule 9 Dr Scholz-IntermediateRiskPC
Module 9 Dr Scholz-IntermediateRiskPC
 
Module 10 Dr Blasko-HighRiskPC
Module 10 Dr Blasko-HighRiskPCModule 10 Dr Blasko-HighRiskPC
Module 10 Dr Blasko-HighRiskPC
 
Module 11 Dr Myers-PSA Relapse
Module 11 Dr Myers-PSA RelapseModule 11 Dr Myers-PSA Relapse
Module 11 Dr Myers-PSA Relapse
 
Module12 Dr Lam-AdvancedPC
Module12 Dr Lam-AdvancedPCModule12 Dr Lam-AdvancedPC
Module12 Dr Lam-AdvancedPC
 

Module 1 Tom Kirk-LandscapePart1

  • 1. Unique and Valuable Services Provided by Support Groups – An information source that is completely free of conflict of interest, an open marketplace for information about all available treatment options – An opportunity to meet others who have already “been through the process” – Venue for accessing information about local doctors from men with first hand experience
  • 2. Program Goals 1. Know all the treatment options that are available and the side effects they can cause 2. Understand how to accurately place individuals into the correct category or stage of prostate cancer including a working knowledge of imaging and pathology 3. Know the roles of the different medical specialists 4. Be familiar with basics of men’s health and commonly used pharmaceuticals and supplements 5. Know the standards for screening & biopsy
  • 3. Mentor’s Class Curriculum 1. Landscape I (Kirk) 7. Imaging (Margolis) 2. Landscape II (Scholz) 8. Low-Risk (Klotz) 3. Men’s Health (Moyad) 9. Intermediate (Scholz) 4. Side Effects (Mulhall) 10. High-Risk (Blasko) 5. Screen/Biopsy (Scholz) 11. PSA Relapse (Myers) 6. Medications (Moyad) 12. Advanced (Lam)
  • 4. Privileged Role of Group Leaders – Have the opportunity to share intimately in the lives of others at their most challenging hour – Are privileged to be an unbiased source providing valuable information that will be potentially life changing
  • 5. Proper Character of Leaders – Constantly developing in the humble skill of imparting useful information to frightened and ill- informed people • Be sensitive to the fact that frightened people have trouble concentrating and learning. Remember, “Fear can’t hear.” • Be sensitive to the fact that imparting knowledge places you in a powerful position. Use the power wisely by being gentle and patient
  • 6. Burden of Support Group Leaders • Valuable and accurate information may be disregarded simply because you don’t have a degree. • The fact that information is provided without cost may cause some to make the mistake of valuing it accordingly. • Conflicts of interest are so prevalent in this arena that some people will still suspect you have a hidden agenda.
  • 7. Burden of Support Group Leaders • Some people will mistakenly assume that your reticence to make concrete recommendations is due to your lack of knowledge • Dealing with people who are convinced they already know the answers will be much more challenging than teaching beginners who are still open to learning
  • 8. The Risk of Being Ignorant, Reliance on a Single Source of Information – Under treatment • Early mortality from improperly treated prostate cancer • Suffering the side effects of treatment for a cancer that would not have relapsed if initial treatment was proper – Over treatment • Ignoring health issues unrelated to prostate cancer that are likely to impair survival anyway • Failing to balance the side effects of treatment with their impact on quality of life
  • 9. Providing Information with Perspective – There are huge amounts of information on the internet. However, information alone is useless without perspective. – Information about a treatment is only useful when placed in perspective with: • The individual’s – Category of prostate cancer – Age and health status – Personal goals and quality of life priorities • How each treatment compares with the other alternatives – Comparisons are only possible by considering all the options
  • 10. Categories of Prostate Cancer – Newly diagnosed • Low-Risk • Intermediate-Risk • High-Risk – PSA Relapse – Advanced disease
  • 11. Newly Diagnosed – Low-Risk • Gleason < 7 • PSA < 10 • Small or absent nodule on digital rectal – Intermediate-Risk • Gleason 7 or PSA 10-20 or larger nodule on digital rectal – High-Risk • PSA > 20 or Gleason>7 or two or more Intermediate-Risk factors or a nodule through capsule
  • 12. 10-Year Survival by Risk Category Low-Risk More than 100% Brenner: Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005 Intermediate With treatment 98% Mayo Clinic Journal of Urology 2008 High-Risk Surgery 95% Mayo Clinic Journal of Urology 2008
  • 13. “Gleason” Grading of Prostate Cancer • Low grade (3) • Higher Grade (4) • Highest Grade (5) • Score = “Adding Up” two grades
  • 14. Newly-Diagnosed: Treatment Options • Active Surveillance • Brachytherapy • IMRT • Testosterone Deprivation • Cryotherapy • HIFU • Surgery
  • 15. Surgery – Robotic • Very dependent on operator quality like any prostate surgery • When compared to the open approach; – Cure rates equivalent to open technology – Shorter hospital stays and quicker recovery – Much smaller scars – Equivalent risks of impotence and incontinence – Open • Certain famous practitioners contend that the open approach is advantageous because they can “feel” the tumor and adjust their margins accordingly. • There is some evidence that positive margins are a little more common with the robotic approach
  • 16. Robotic Prostatectomy  Surgeon operates at the console within a 3D view  Bedside surgical assistant is next to the patient  Instruments move like a human wrist (↑ dexterity and precision)
  • 17. Differences in Surgical Scars Little scars Big Scar Standard Surgery Robotic Surgery
  • 18. Surgery • Advantages – More precise staging and estimates of relapse risk compared to the other options – Easier to do PSA monitoring to detect early relapse • Disadvantages – Higher risk of impotence and incontinence compared to the other options (except cryotherapy) – Higher risk of requiring further therapy such as radiation and/or hormone (due to positive margins) – Anesthesia risks such as heart attacks and short term memory loss
  • 19. Impotence Five Years after Surgery: 1288 Men David Penson Journal of Urology 2005 • Incapable of an erection adequate for intercourse even with Viagra Age < 54 39% 55-59 51% 60-64 56% > 65 82%
  • 20. Incontinence Rates with the Best Surgeon 12 mo Pat Walsh (Open) 93% Ahlering (Robotic) 94% Shalhav (Robotic) 84% Lee (Robotic) 90%
  • 21. “Optimal Surgical Competency Requires a minimum of 250 Practice Cases” • In the New York during the whole of the year in 2005: – 25% of the urologists did a single radical prostectomy – 80% of the urologists did <10 cases Savage & Vickers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Journal of Urology December 2009
  • 22. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) – Advantages • Substantially lower risk of impotence and incontinence compared to surgery • Cure rates at least as good as surgery and possibly better – Disadvantages • PSA monitoring after treatment is more ambiguous than with surgery • Small but real risk(1/50?) of a non-healing rectal burn – Proton Therapy • Same as IMRT in all regards except may possibly have a slightly higher risk of non-healing rectal burn than IMRT
  • 23. Active Surveillance – Advantages • Vastly lower risk of immediate side effects – Disadvantages • Prostate biopsy after a year. Every 2-3 years thereafter • 5 alpha reductase inhibitors are occasionally employed and may affect sex drive • Cancer growing more rapidly than anticipated could necessitate increased treatment (hormones plus radiation instead of radiation alone?) than what would have been necessary at initial time of diagnosis
  • 24. Cryotherapy – Total Cryotherapy • Advantages – Shorter treatment course than IMRT • Disadvantages – Highest incidence of impotence – Incontinence rates comparable to surgery – Focal Cryotherapy – Still investigational – Much lower rate of impotence and incontinence – Only for carefully selected candidates
  • 25. Hormone Therapy – Advantages • Reversible side effect • Total body anti-cancer effect • Enhanced surgery and radiation cure rates – Disadvantages • Side effects impact the whole body • Controls, but rarely cures the disease
  • 26. Brachytherapy – Permanent Seeds • Advantages – Convenient outpatient administration • Disadvantages – Not appropriate for prostate size > 60cc – Not appropriate for men with preexisting urinary issues – Temporary Seeds • Advantages – Can cover outside the prostate in seminal vesicles • Disadvantages – Involves one or two hospitalizations for a couple days
  • 27.
  • 29. X-Ray of Seed Implant
  • 30. HIFU – Total HIFU • Advantages – Outpatient treatment given in a single procedure • Disadvantages – TURP required for treatment of larger glands – Cure rates may be inferior to other options – Only available outside the country – Expensive – Focal HIFU – Still investigational – Much lower rate of impotence and incontinence – Only for carefully selected candidates
  • 31. Treatment Selection Flow Chart Active Surveillance Low-Risk Determine Seeds or IMRT or Cryotherapy or Disease Intermediate Surgery or Hormones or Risk Active Surveillance or HIFU or IMRT plus Short-Term Hormones High-Risk Long-Term Hormones plus IMRT plus Brachytherapy
  • 32. PSA Relapse • Higher-Risk – Newly-diagnosed risk category was high – Early relapse (<2 years) – Fast PSA doubling of less than 6-8 months – Younger age • Lower-Risk – Newly-diagnosed risk category was low – Delayed relapse more than 2 yrs after local treatment – PSA doubling > 12 months – Older age
  • 33. PSA Relapsed Prostate Cancer Cancer Type Life Expectancy after Relapse • Pancreatic cancer 4 months • Kidney cancer 6 months • Stomach cancer 8 months • Lung cancer 12 months • Prostate cancer 160 months
  • 34. PSA Relapse—Treatment Options – Cryotherapy (after radiation) – Hormone therapy • Continuous • Intermittent • Antiandrogen monotherapy – Observation – Immune therapy such as Leukine – Radiation (after surgery, cryo, hormones or HIFU) • Fossa • Nodes • Nodes and fossa
  • 35. Treatment Selection Flow Chart 1. Observation vs. Lower Risk 2. Radiation to fossa vs. 3. Cryotherapy to prostate vs. 4. Intermittent Hormones PSA Relapse Radiation or Cryo to fossa plus Higher Risk Radiation to pelvic nodes plus Hormone therapy (Plue
  • 36. Advanced Disease • Hormone resistance defined as a rising PSA with testosterone less than 50 or • A PSA over 100 or • Proven metastatic cancer outside the lymph nodes of the pelvis
  • 37. Advanced Disease—Lower Risk – Metastases but still hormone sensitive – Lower PSA levels and slower rate of rise – Relatively few bone metastases – Disease limited to lymph nodes – Not resistant to multiple treatments – No detectable circulating tumor cells
  • 38. Advanced Disease—Higher Risk – Faster rate of PSA rise – High levels of circulating tumor cells (CTC) – More extensive bone metastases – Bone pain – Liver metastases – Resistant to multiple treatments
  • 39. Treatment Advanced Disease • Bone – Xgeva, Zometa, Samarium, (AlphaRadin) & spot radiation • Immune – Provenge • Trials – TAK-700, Ipilimumab, XL-184, Curstersin & Prostavax, • Chemo – Taxotere, Jevtana, Mitoxantrone, Carbo, Xeloda & Thalomid • Hormonal – Bicalutamide, Nilutamide, Ketoconazole, Estrogen, Zytiga & (MDV-3100)
  • 40. Treatment Selection • Any Risk – Xgeva or Zometa monthly • Lower Risk – Hormonal treatment – Provenge – Combinations of both • Higher Risk – Chemotherapy – Hormonal – Combinations of both
  • 41. Knowing When to Change Treatment • After starting a new treatment monitor response closely for 90 days by checking: – PSA, PAP, LDH, ALP every 2-4 weeks – Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) monthly – Bone scans CT, MRI and Pet scan every 3 to 6 months – A reduction in pain is usually the first sign of a response • Change treatment immediately if no response or if excessive side effects
  • 42. General Principles • Be nimble by checking disease status frequently and changing treatment right away when something is not working • All other things being equal, starting treatment earlier is better than waiting – Less cancer to kill – Immune system is stronger • Combination treatment is better than single agents as long as the side effects or the cost are not excessive
  • 43. General Principles • Physical fitness is totally critical – Testosterone is low – Age is advanced – Almost all the treatments cause fatigue • Prostate cancer kills by weakening bone marrow – Use spot radiation and samarium sparingly – Use Aranesp (to reverse anemia) – Use Neulasta (to prevent infections while on chemo)
  • 44. Conclusions #1 • Treatment selection is totally dependent on being assigned to the correct category – Newly-Diagnosed • Low, Intermediate & High Risk – PSA Relapse • Lower vs. Higher Risk – Advanced Disease • Lower vs. Higher Risk
  • 45. Additional Conclusions • Unawareness of a treatment option is identical to that treatment not existing • Effective treatment administered early is superior to the exact same treatment administered late. So vigilant monitoring and detection of disease progression early is critical. • Physical fitness is important all stages but is vitally important for men with advanced disease.

Notas del editor

  1. New Developments for Relapsed Prostate Cancer April 1st 2003 Richard Lam M.D. Prostate Oncology Specialists, Marina del Rey, California