Publicidad

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a ICFA2020Presentation-PASCUAL, DIOLA.pptx(20)

Publicidad

ICFA2020Presentation-PASCUAL, DIOLA.pptx

  1. “Drop Biscuits Enriched with Bioactive Fish (Sardinella lemuru) Bone Powder and Turmeric (Curcuma lunga L.) Extract” Rosita L. Diola1 and Pet Anthony L. Pascual2 1Eastern Visayas State University (EVSU)- Ormoc Campus 2Center for Organic and Natural Food Research (CONFoR), Southern Leyte State University (SLSU), Philippines
  2. • The NSCB estimates that 1.5 million Filipino do not have the basic household nutritional requirement (Oxfam International, 2018). • Increasing demand for Functional Foods (Ross, 2000). • Functional Food demonstrates beneficial affects to one or more target function in the body, beyond adequate nutritional effects. • Foods that improves state of health and well being and/or reduction in the risk of diseases. The health and nutrition problems in the Philippines Source:Philstar.com Functional foods as possible solution
  3. • Turmeric, next to ginger, are also grown widely in the province. • Turmeric contains nutrients like ascorbic acid, calcium, carbohydrates, fat, iron, niacin, potassium, phosphorus, protein, riboflavin, sodium, thiamine, and water, that can give the body to prevent against various diseases (Jaggi Lai, 2012) • Pollution brought about by poor waste management is a global concern and countries around the world should promote the reduction of wastes (UN, 2012) • Fish heads and bones account for about 45% of waste in fish processing industries (Lue, 2004). • Sardines locally known as lopoy are cheap and abundantly found in the waters of Southern Leyte. Source: FAO • Fish industries contribute to the global pollution problem (Torella, 2018). Waste Management Problem Commodities abundant in Southern Leyte
  4. How can we reduce the waste produced (heads and bones) from consumption of many sardines? How can we maximize the utilization of nutrient-densed turmeric abundant in the province? R. Diola
  5. General Objective • To determine the effect of sardines (Sardinella lemuru) fish bone powder and Turmeric (Curcuma longa l.) extract as Bioactive Component on Drop Biscuit. Specific Objectives • To determine the effect on sensory qualities of drop biscuit using different level of sardine fish bone powder. • To determine the effect on sensory qualities of drop biscuit using different level of turmeric extract. • To determine the effect on sensory qualities of drop biscuit using different level combination of sardine fish bone powder and turmeric extract.
  6. • To evaluate the proximate composition of the biscuit using the control sample and the best treatment in terms of sensory evaluation • To assess the shelf-life of drop biscuit using the control sample and the best treatment in sensory evaluation at 0,18 and 31 days of storage. • To determine the cost of production and selling price of the biscuits.
  7. Methodology Procurement of Raw Materials Mixing all the Dry Ingredients Fish Bone Powder Treatment (0, 10g,20g) Mixing of Dry & Wet Ingredients Stirring Turmeric Extract Treatment (0, 5 ml,15ml) Dropping (15g) Baking (220℃ for 12 to 15 min.) Fig 1. Process Flow Chart of making Fish bone powder-Turmeric Drop Biscuit
  8. Table 1. Treatment Fish bone powder (g) Turmeric extract (ml) T0 Control Control T1 10 0 T2 20 0 T3 0 5 T4 0 15 T5 10 5 T6 10 15 T7 20 5 T8 20 15 Different levels of Sardines fish bone powder and turmeric extract using 3x3 factorial design.
  9. Fish Bone-Turmeric Drop Biscuits Production Cost & Selling Price Determination Proximate Analysis (Control Sample & Best Treatment in Sensory Evaluation) Sensory Evaluation Shelf Life Analysis (Control Sample & Best Treatment in Sensory Evaluation) (0,18,31 days) RFC %FC SP= --------------- Yield • Color • Taste • Aroma • Flavor • General Acceptability  2 way ANOVA  DMRT  Moisture Content  Ash Determination  Dry Matter Content  Crude Fat (Ether Extraction)  t- test Fig 2. Different Experiment/Analysis conducted on Fish Bone- Turmeric Drop Biscuit
  10. Results and Discussions T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Figure 3. Fish bone- turmeric drop biscuits from different treatments
  11. Effects Color Aroma Flavor Texture General Acceptability Interaction (FB*TE) 1.211ns 1.362ns 0.300ns 0.956ns 0.915ns Main (FB) 0.515 ns 3.653* 2.108ns 0.739ns 4.419* Main (TE) 0.49ns 0.563ns 0.686ns 0.183ns 0.630ns Table 2. Summary of Two-way ANOVA F-ratios for the sensory acceptability of fish bone turmeric biscuits • No significant interaction effects of fishbone and turmeric treatments • Significant main effects of fishbone treatment on aroma and general acceptability Sensory Evaluation
  12. Treatment A B Description Acceptability Rating 0 0 0 yellow to dark yellow 6.60 1 10 0 dark yellow 6.72 2 20 0 dark yellow to yellowish brown 6.65 3 0 5 dark yellow to yellowish brown 6.71 4 0 15 dark yellow to yellowish brown 6.56 5 10 5 dark yellow to yellowish brown 6.35 6 10 15 dark yellow to yellowish brown 6.53 7 20 5 dark yellow 6.38 8 20 15 dark yellow to yellowish brown 6.51 Table 3. Quality description and mean1 acceptability ratings2 for color of fish bone-turmeric biscuits as affected by varying levels of fish bone powder and turmeric extracts. 1N = 60 A- Fish bone powder (g) B- Turmeric extract (mL) Overall Response mean = 6.84 2Range of scores: 9- like extremely 6-like slightly 3-dislike moderately 8- like very much 5- neither like nor dislike 2- dislike very much 7- like moderately 4- dislike slightly 1- dislike extremely
  13. Table 4. Quality description and mean1 acceptability ratings2 for aroma of fish bone-turmeric biscuits as affected by varying levels of fish bone powder and turmeric extracts Treatment A B Description Acceptability Rating 0 0 0 no distinct turmeric and fishbone aroma 6.90 1 10 0 dominant fish bone than turmeric aroma 6.30 2 20 0 dominant fish bone than turmeric aroma 6.01 3 0 5 dominant turmeric than fish bone aroma 6.78 4 0 15 dominant turmeric than fish bone aroma 6.28 5 10 5 moderate fish bone and turmeric aroma 6.31 6 10 15 moderate fish bone and turmeric aroma 6.64 7 20 5 dominant fish bone than turmeric aroma 6.21 8 20 15 extreme fish bone and turmeric aroma 6.24 1N = 60 A- Fish bone powder (g) B- Turmeric extract (mL) Overall Response mean = 6.84 2Range of scores: 9- like extremely 6-like slightly 3-dislike moderately 8- like very much 5- neither like nor dislike 2- dislike very much 7- like moderately 4- dislike slightly 1- dislike extremely
  14. Table 5. Quality description and mean1 acceptability ratings2 for flavor of fish bone-turmeric biscuits as affected by varying levels of fish bone powder and turmeric extracts. Treatment A B Description Acceptability Rating 0 0 0 no distinct turmeric and fishbone flavor 6.66 1 10 0 dominant fish bone than turmeric flavor 6.25 2 20 0 dominant fish bone than turmeric flavor 6.19 3 0 5 dominant turmeric than fish bone flavor 6.66 4 0 15 dominant turmeric than fish bone flavor 6.34 5 10 5 dominant fish bone than turmeric flavor 6.37 6 10 15 moderate fish bone and turmeric flavor 6.35 7 20 5 dominant fish bone than turmeric flavor 6.35 8 20 15 extreme fish bone and turmeric flavor 6.12 1N = 60 A- Fish bone powder (g) B- Turmeric extract (mL) Overall Response mean = 6.84 2Range of scores: 9- like extremely 6-like slightly 3-dislike moderately 8- like very much 5- neither like nor dislike 2- dislike very much 7- like moderately 4- dislike slightly 1- dislike extremely
  15. Table 6. Quality description and mean1 acceptability ratings2 for texture of fish bone-turmeric biscuits as affected by varying levels of fish bone powder and turmeric extracts. Treatment A B Description Acceptability Rating 0 0 0 soft but firm to firm 6.61 1 10 0 firm 6.21 2 20 0 firm to moderately firm 6.37 3 0 5 firm to moderately firm 6.35 4 0 15 firm 6.59 5 10 5 firm to moderately firm 6.61 6 10 15 firm to moderately firm 6.65 7 20 5 Soft but firm to firm 6.38 8 20 15 firm 6.25 1N = 60 A- Fish bone powder (g) B- Turmeric extract (mL) Overall Response mean = 6.84 2Range of scores: 9- like extremely 6-like slightly 3-dislike moderately 8- like very much 5- neither like nor dislike 2- dislike very much 7- like moderately 4- dislike slightly 1- dislike extremely
  16. Table 7. Quality description and mean1 acceptability ratings2 for general acceptability of fish bone-turmeric biscuits as affected by varying levels of fish bone powder and turmeric extracts. Treatment A B Acceptability Rating 0 0 0 7.15 1 10 0 6.82 2 20 0 6.70 3 0 5 6.76 4 0 15 6.92 5 10 5 7.01 6 10 15 6.91 7 20 5 6.61 8 20 15 6.36 1N = 60 A- Fish bone powder (g) B- Turmeric extract (mL) Overall Response mean = 6.84 2Range of scores: 9- like extremely 6-like slightly 3-dislike moderately 8- like very much 5- neither like nor dislike 2- dislike very much 7- like moderately 4- dislike slightly 1- dislike extremely
  17. Shelf life Determination Table 8. Microbial analysis and detection for the presence of pathogens of fishbone- turmeric biscuits during storage at room temperature Type of Test Period of Monitoring Day 1 Day 18 Day 31 T0 T7 T0 T7 T0 T7 Aerobic Plate Count* (CFU/ml) 3.33x10 1.5x10 4.0x10 4.6x10 2.63x102 1.06x102 A. Salmonella - - - - - - B. E. coli - - - - - - T0 – Control T7 -20 g fishbone powder: 5 ml turmeric extract (-) : negative *average from 3 replicates
  18. Proximate Analysis Table 9. Proximate composition of fishbone - turmeric biscuit and control sample T0 – Control T7 -20 g fishbone powder: 5 ml turmeric extract *average from 3 replicates Sample Proximate Composition (%)* Moisture Content ns Dry Matter ns Ash ns Ether Extract ns T0 18.57 81.42 83.86 23.29 T7 18.60 81.42 83.70 22.53
  19. Production Cost and Selling Price Analysis Table 10. Production cost and selling price of different treatments Treatment Production Cost (Php) Selling Price (Php)/ 30g biscuit 0 37.58 2.23 1 47.58 2.83 2 57.58 3.42 3 38.20 2.27 4 38.83 2.31 5 48.20 2.86 6 48.83 2.90 7 58.20 3.46 8
  20. Conclusions • No significant interaction effects of fishbone and turmeric treatments on the sensory characteristics of biscuits • Significant main effects of fishbone treatment on aroma and general acceptability • Fishbone-turmeric drop biscuits are shelf stable after 31 days at room temperature with no growth of E.coli and salmonella. • Fishbone-turmeric drop biscuits are composed of 18.60% moisture, 81.42% dry matter, 83.70% ash and 22.53% crude fat • Different fishbone-turmeric drop biscuits has a production cost range of Php 37.48 to Php 58.83 and a selling price range of Php 2.23 to Php 3.50 per 30g biscuit.
  21. Recommendations • Use of higher levels of fishbone powder and turmeric extract combinations. • The use of semi-trained or trained panel to minimize extreme effects for sensory evaluation. • Further works on limiting the strong fishy aroma of fishbone powder. • Identification of the dominant spoilage microorganisms growing on the biscuits. • Further study on the purchasing intentions on the developed product ,as the product presents potential for commercialization.
  22. Key References Aberoumand A. (2011), A review article on edible pigments properties and sources as natural bio colorant in foodstuff and food industry, World Journal of Dairy and Food Science, Vol.6, No.1, 71-78. Abdeldaiem M. H. (2014), Use of yellow pigment extracted from turmeric (curcuma longa) rhizomes powder as natural food preservative, American Journals of Food Science and Technology, Vol.2, No.1, 36-47. Amitha, C.V. , Raju, I.p. lakshmisha, p. Arun kumar, a. Sarojini, gajendra and jag pal. (2019). Nutritional Composition of Fish Bone Powder Extracted from Three different Fish Filleting Waste Boiling with Water and an Alkaline Media. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 8(02): 2942-2948.
  23. Atwood, J. (1993). EC942 Secrets in Biscuit Dough. Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension. 2367. Kapil kumar et al. (2012), Curcumin: A Dietary pigment of kitchen having miraculous therapeutic effect, Journal of Pharmacy Research, Vol.5, No.1, 254-256. Kusumaningrum I and Asikin N. A., (2016), The characteristic of calcium fortified fish kerupuk from belida (Chitala sp) fish bone. Journal Pengolahan hasil perikanan Indonesia., 19(3):233-240. Nemati, M., Kamilah, H., Huda, N. & Ariffin, F. (2016). In vitro calcium availability in bakery products fortified with tuna bone powder as a natural calcium source. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 67, 535–540.
  24. THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
Publicidad