A Presentation made to the student of BDevS at Center for Development Studies, National College for Higher Education, KU in October 2014, kathmandu, Nepal

1. Nepal:
Urban planning and
development
Lecture Series 4
BDevS, Center for Development Studies
National College for Higher Education, KU, Nepal
Rajendra P Sharma
rpsharma@mailcity.com

2. Nepal: Where are we ! Urban Poverty Situation
!! Out of 664,507 HH in the Municipalities of Nepal:
 Temporary Houses : 101,005
 House made up of mud : 225,932
 Houses using Kerosene for Light : 107, 650
 HHs do not have Flush Toilets : 312,318
 HHs even have no toilet : 145,527
 HHs using fire woods for cooking : 220,616
 HHs using kerosene : 226,597
 HHs using Bio Gas only : 181,410
 HHs having traditional water source : 206,072
 HHs having piped drinking water : 439,239
 Population not having TV : 45%
 Population neither have TV nor Radio : 24%
Source: CBS 2001

3. Nepal: Where are we ! Urban Poverty Situation
Among 664,507 Urban HHs in Nepal:
 Temporary Shelter : 15%
 Residing in Rented Houses : 35%
 Disadvantaged Groups : 21%
 No easy access to water/Quantity : 5 %
 Have no proper/adequate fuel : 36%
 Have no proper light : 16 %
 Have no proper toilet : 22%
Among 3,227,879 Urban Population:
 Illiterate (6 years or more aged) : 28%
 Have no work (active population : 10 %
 Death by poverty related diseases : 13 %
 Population not having TV : 45%
 Population neither have TV nor Radio : 24%
This is the reason to have focus on Municipal Periodic Plan
Source: CBS 2001

4. Defining urban area 1
 Urban and Rural character
 Economic activity and livelihood
 Population Density and composition
 Infrastructure and services; and resources
 Market, institutions
 Culture, civilization and innovation
 Concentration of population: economic, social and political
implications (higher per capita productivity; Political process
and participation)
 Resource consumption and pollution emission

5. Defining Urban Area 2
 Acceptable basis: Density, occupational structure
 Criteria used in Nepal
 1952 census: prominent settlement, ≥5000 population
 1961 census: Urban environment, ≥ 5000 population
 Municipal Act 1962: Urban environment, ≥ 10,000 population
 LSGA 1999: Metropolitan City (≥ 300,000; NPR 400 m revenue;
Urban facilities; already sub-metropolitan); Sub-metropolitan (≥
100,000; NPR 100 m revenue; Urban facilities; already
Municipality);, Municipality (Tarai ≥ 20,000; NPR 5 m revenue;
Urban facilities), Municipality (Hill ≥ 10,000; NPR 500,000

6. Municipal sizes
 ≥ 100,000 population:
1 metropolitan, 4 sub-metropolitan,
Over 39% population
 20,000 to 100,000 population
45 municipalities, over 54%
population
 10,000 to 20,000:
8 municipalities, over 4 % popn
 Small towns: less than 10,000
popn
Hill/ mountains 550
Kathmandu Valley 10,265
Inner Tarai 402
Tarai 1,092
Urban total 985
Rural total 136
Urban density (person/ sq.km.) 2001
Sizes

7. Urban Feature, Indicator Highlights
 Contribution to economy : urban economy growing @ 6.4 %
annum, contribute about 60% of GDP.
 Economic base: service and trade oriented, links with rural
 Distribution: along E-W Highway, India Border, Kathmandu &
Central (19 places, 55% population)
 Defined and undefined urban areas: 58 defined, 132 small
towns, 600 market centers.

8. Main Constraints
 Lack of vision and coordination: no long-term perspective, linking
national development with urban development. No urban
development policy/ strategy.
 Urban expansion
 Sectoral policy/ plan and institution dominates urban development:
problems of coordination
 LSGA: municipalities increased role for urban governance,
development and management: but lack capacity (HR, Financial)-
depends on central grants/ large proportion spent on administration
and salary

9. Major urban challenges
 Service and Land management
 National development policy
 Donor driven development
 Management of migration/displaced person
 Waste and pollution Management
 Maintaining Infrastructures, service & creating jobs
 Devolution/Decentralization
 High Rate of Urbanization - Increase in nos. of Municipalities
without basic infrastructures and services
 Population growth in the municipalities
 Allocation of Central Government fund to the cities is less as
compared to the contribution of the cities to GDP

10. Urban Concerns
Total 1,350 t/ day: Kathmandu 383 t/day
Per capita per day 0.34 kg (vary 0.11 to 0.93 kg)
Solid
waste
Air pollution
Emerging issue in major towns: vehicular/industrial emission, waste
burning, adulterated fuel.
Kathmandu Foggy days increased: 38 d/y (1970) to 60 d/ y (1994)
Indoor air pollution in smaller towns: (biomass fuel)
Health impacts: ARI, Pneumonia, Bronchitis, Asthma
Congestion
Urban roads: narrow, poor network function, lacks parking
Deficiency in planning and provision: Increase in vehicles not
matched by provision of roads and infrastructure
Mix traffic types, poor driving, bad parking, roadside trading
add to traffic congestion
Impact: travel time, air/noise, fuel consumption

11. Decentralization Chronology
YEAR INITIATIVE REMARKS
1962 Constitution of Nepal Emphasis on decentralization of Panchayats
27 June 2007
Creation of post of Chief District Officer (CDO)
1965 Local Administration Act Decentralization plan of three phases
Panchayat Development Land Tax (PDLT), Pilot scheme
1972 Local Development Department Creation of post of Panchayat Development Officer (PDO)
1974 District Administration Plan Provision for District Development Plan
1978 Integrated Panchayat Development
Design
Idea of "Service Centre" as focal point for local planning 1979, PDLT
withdrawn
1980
Establishment of Ministry of Local
Development (MLD)
Conversion of PDO to LDO (Local Development Officer)
1981
Merger of Panchayat and Local
Development Ministries as MPLD
Integrated Rural Development Central Co-ordination Board
1982 Decentralization Act Districts to prepare periodic plans
1984 Decentralization Rules District, Village, Town Panchayats to prepare annual/periodic plans
1989 Supporting Decentralized Planning Project (SLDP)
1992 DDC, VDC and Municipality Act Increased responsibility for local development 1992
1992 DDC, VDC and Municipality Rules Decentralization Support Project (DSP)
1995, Participatory District Development Project (PDDP)
1996 Decentralization Co-ordination
Committee
1996, Local Governance Programme (LGP)
1999 Local Self-governance Act More on delegation than devolution

12. Urban and Physical Planning in Nepal
 Nepal undergone several political changes after Rana regime.
 History of urban planning began with Third National Plan (1967-71)
 In 1973, Town Plan Implementation Act (TPIA) was enacted
 In 1982, a Decentralization Act to facilitate development processes
 In 1988, the Town Development Act (TDA) was promulgated
 In 1992, Municipal Act and Rules were defined
 Till date, more than 33 municipalities prepared IAPs. But, IAPs failed
due to contradictory legal framework and weaknesses in terms of
institutional capacities at both central and local levels.
 MPPW helps municipalities to develop periodic plans (3 to 5 years)
 involvement of municipalities in planning has positive results
27 June 2007

13. Municipal Distribution in Nepal

14. Framework: Municipal’s Decision Making
EVERY VOTER IN
THE CONSTITUENCY
WARD COMMITTEE
WARD FOOTPRINT
SMALL LOCAL GROUP
POLLING BOOTH LEVEL
WARD/COUNCILLOR WARD
CHAIRPERSON
MUNICIPALITY
MUNICIPAL AREA/ CITYLEVEL
TOLE SABHA REPRESENTATIVE

15. Linkages: Municipality’s formal system
Water
Supply
Schemes
Water
Groups
Police
Communit
y Police
Solid
Waste
Mgmt
SWM
Compost
Groups
Urban
Poverty
Program
s
Self
Help
Groups
Urban
Planning
N’hood
Forums
Road
Works
Supervisio
n
Resident
Welfare
Associs’n
Municipality
Ward Councilors
Chairperson
???????
“Why have so many different platforms?
Why not a single, permanent platform,
linked to the city’s decision-systems, which
can be available for all issues?”

16. LINKS AMONG THE URBAN STAKEHOLDERS
Central Government
(MLD and MPPW)
Urban Development Partners
(International and national)
NPC
Municipalities
1 2 3 4 57 58
Citizens
LEGEND
• established link
• Potential link

17. Future Direction
 Clear Vision: How Urban Dev. links with National Dev. & rural dev.?
 Urban development strategy: better criteria/definition for conferring
urban status, independent body certify area for urban status, improved
coordination, mandate & responsibility.
 Strengthen urban governance : These are the key to sustainability -
decentralization, participation, Resource & Capacity Building.
 Integrated, planned and holistic approach: (not only for urban
infrastructure provision, Urban development is broad, multi-sectoral).

18. Urban Planning and Development
Where we want to go?
And,
What should we do……….now?
?
If we want better future
We should question, advocate,
plan and better implement those
plans and programs

19. PLANNING PROCESS

20. What is Urban planning?
 Urban planning is concerned with the ordering and design of
settlements, from the smallest towns to the world's largest cities.
 Urban Planning - for improvement of urban centers to provide
healthy, safe living condition, efficient transport, communication,
adequate public facility, and aesthetic surroundings.
 Urban planning is the discipline of land use planning which
explores several aspects of the infrastructures and social
environments of municipalities and communities. Other professions
deal in more detail with a smaller scale of development, namely
architecture, landscape architecture and urban design.
27 June 2007

21. Why urban planning ?
Urban planning, serve as a reference for all activities that
manages the promotion of urban citizens, that include:
 Setting up infrastructures or collective equipment,
 Granting land to private developers,
 Facilitating activity set-up,
 Obtaining building permits.
27 June 2007

22. History of Urban Planning
 Many ancient cities were built from definite plans;
 Greek Hippodamus (c.407 BC) considered father of city plan in West
 Urban planning in organized way existed for less than a century;
 John Nash planned some section of London; Vienna; Paris in 19th century
 Since early 20th century, planning for cities has emphasized
 Early 21st century, new urban theory and innovative planning concepts
developed.
27 June 2007

23. Urban development Concept and
strategy
27 June 2007

24. City Strategic framework: Structure for
27 June 2007
strategic agenda

25. a 'sustainable' or ideal home city might look like
 compact, efficient land use;
 less automobile but better access;
 efficient resource use, less pollution and
waste;
 good housing and living environments;
 a healthy social ecology;
 sustainable economics;
 community participation and preservation
of culture and wisdom.
Successful urban planning considers character, of "home"
27 June 2007

26. Planning Process
Urban planning procedure follows a cyclical process
 Data collection, estimates, diagnostics,
 Determination of stakes and objectives,
 Definition and choice of strategy,
 Drawing up of plans of action,
 Promotion and implementation,
 Assessment and check.
27 June 2007

27. Actors and planning process
 Traditional planning focused top-down: town planner creates plan
 Over past decades, role of urban planner become democratic
 Community workers now involved in planning at grassroots level.
 The Contemporary city Planning process is highly complex:
 step-by-step procedure, involve a series of survey/studies,
 development of land-use plan and transportation plan,
 preparation of a budget, and
 approval of unified master plan by various agency or
legislative bodies.

28. Information input in urban planning
 Information input in urban planning is primarily of 2 types:
 satellite and photogrammetric images,
 tabular data garnered from censuses, studies.
 Benefits provided by satellite images include the following:
 global observations of land cover,
 fast processing of data using automated classification and
techniques,
 cost effectiveness in comparison with ground surveys and
digitization methods.
27 June 2007

29. Planning tools: data use
 Physical maps
 Activity maps
 Facility maps
 Local plan maps
 Risk and pollution maps
 Land use regulation map
 Socio-economic maps: Demography, Sociology, Economy, Housing
27 June 2007

30. The three Keys in Planning
 The 3-steps process determining where you are now,
determining where you want to go, and then determining
how to get there?
 These questions are the essence of success!
 It can be start with the self evaluation on your:
 Strengths,
 Weaknesses,
 Opportunities, and
 Threats
SWOT Analysis

31. Key aspects of participatory planning
Participation: where we can generate:
 Ideas - People deciding the factors governing them
 Democratic institution - Participatory governance institutions
 Democratic practice - the political participation
Key aspects of Participation
 Formal structure decision-making
 Permanent platform for participation
 Inclusive platform for all citizens
 Common system for various issues
 For citizens: the opportunity and no excuse not to participate!

32. Key focus on urban planning
Urban Poverty
[Vicious Circle]
Low investment
Low income
Temporary job/ paid
not sufficient
Not rely on own
Production
Low Education Quality
High level of violence
Health & Hygiene
Need to pay for every
services (Health, Sanitation,
Education, Water)
Break by external Illegal Settlement
involvement

33. Vision for Planning
 Vision: a comprehensive vision at citizens’ level can create participation
 Series: a series of campaign can create an ownership over the plan

34. The steps in the planning process
Govt.
The City Government
Strategic planning Institutions
Workshop
Community
Participation
Strategic planning
committee
Strategic Plan
Central Government
NGOs, local self-help
group, Institutions, and
Intellectuals
Strategic planning
Workshop
Community
Participation
Strategic planning
committee
Strategic Plan
As product

35. Outcomes from planning
Engaged citizens
A felt sense of purpose
Permanent involvement through legitimate platforms
Improved city management
Enhanced use of data
Regular sharing of information
Emergence of financially sustainable cities
Equitable outcomes
Infrastructure needs identified & prioritised by the people
Increased stakeholder ownership
Building partnerships with citizens-the permanent stakeholders

36. Develop an Municipal plan
“Impact Chain” for City Development
Level
Name of the Development Intervention:
Partner Organization:
Intermediary:
Target Group:
Impact
Direct
benefit
Indicators:
Utilisation
of outputs
Outputs
Activities
No need for indicator, activities are implemented
Resources

37. The concluding remarks … …
In this rapidly urbanizing world,
the number of city dwellers are
increasing at a steep rate. So, is
increasing the discrepancies.
Therefore, Please let’s do
something for better plan of our cities
from our ends and send out thoughtful
messages for a safe and secure future,
wherever we are living!!

38. References