1. Educating
Professional Entrepreneurs
for the 21st Century:
The Academy of Management, Management Education
Division Exchange Presentation for 2007
Thomas A. Bryant, Ph.D.
Rohrer Endowed Chair in Entrepreneurial Studies
Rowan University, USA
@ the Nippon Academy of Management Education,
Takamatsu; 23 November 2007
2. Agenda
Define the standards
Identify the state of the art
Discuss the leading edges of the field
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference2
3. Why Study Entrepreneurship?
Social value of the economy:
Goods and services
Innovators create new goods and services
Entrepreneurs test and prove their market
potential
Big companies consolidate and distribute
efficiently (MANAGEMENT?)
Corporate innovation / entrepreneurship
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference3
4. Social Value 2
Jobs
Meaningful work
Wages => exchange value (cash to buy things)
Who creates the new jobs?
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference4
5. David Birch (MIT), 1979
US Economy: 16 million new jobs
Fortune 1000 Companies:
No change in the number of jobs
Government / public sector
Minor growth
Small business
Not much change
“Gazelles” (3% of firms)
Fast growing, job creators -- Led by entrepreneurs
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference5
6. Edward Lowe Foundation, 2007
Job creation effects, 2003-2006, Philadelphia MSA
Category Stages Ownership Job Creation % of Net New
Jobs
Firms 1-9 1: Startup Local +105,000 +43%
Firms 10-99 2: Growth Local +110,000 +45%
Firms 100-999 3 & 4: mid- Local? +10,000 +5%
sized
Non-profit / Local? +15,000 +7%
Public
Gains +236,000
Firms > 999 5: Consolidation Not local? -210,000 -93%
Losses -210,000
Cumulative +26,000 +7%
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference6
7. ENTR Ed vs. SBM
Small Business Management (=SBM)
Older field
Focused on excellence in non-growth firms
Efficiency
Entrepreneurship Education (= ENTR Ed)
Focused on Creating and guiding GROWTH
Creativity
New Ventures
Innovation management
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference7
8. ENTR Ed in Business Schools:
Standard: Same as Accounting, Marketing,
Finance, MIS, Engineering, or Education
Competence in the Undergraduates:
accepted knowledge and Ready to earn a decent
current practices living as an entry-level
Ready to start work, professional in the field
begin career, advance MBAs:
toward senior levels of Ready to earn a good
occupation living as an mid-level
professional in the field
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference8
9. What Do Professional
Entrepreneurs Do?
MUST focus on successful practitioners
NOT the average, or the poor performers
Entrepreneurship defined by:
Creating new organizations (for-profit, and social)
Growing at well-above-average rates
Recycling economic resources to higher value uses
Who are the model performers?
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference9
10. Professional Entrepreneurs
Start new ventures -- Add value at above-
and sell them for a average rates
profit Create incremental
Start new ventures -- value (1+1>2)
and keep them growing
for a full career Innovate
Take over static or Seize opportunities
declining ventures and Reject bad deals
turn them back into
growth engines
Cut their losses early
Accumulate wealth
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference10
11. Entrepreneurs Get Paid
As managers -- salary
As entrepreneurs -- for growth in equity
As investors -- for returns on invested capital
Daily -- in challenge and excitement
Monthly -- salary / owner’s draw
Exit -- change in equity value
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference11
12. Emergence of ENTR Ed
A few courses on Small Business Management
David Birch, 1979: Gazelles create jobs
Drive to uncover latent entrepreneurs
Public support for entrepreneurs and ENTR Ed
Focus on Start-ups
High value-added startups: Technology?
Corporate entrepreneurship: the growth layer
Family business: mix of growth and SB Management
Edward Lowe Foundation, 2007: “Second stage”
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference12
13. Can Entrepreneurship Be
Taught? Learned?
Many ways!
Hard knocks (original)
Observation of practice / informal apprenticeship
(old-fashioned)
Research-based pedagogy (modern)
Fastest growing field in Academy of Management for
nearly a decade
Over 4000 member in ENT Division now
Over 50% of US colleges and universities
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference13
14. Tracks within ENTR Ed
Lead Entrepreneurs (15%)
Entrepreneurial support providers (25%)
Family business inheritors (30%)
Corporate innovation managers (30%)
Small business experts (?)
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference14
15. The Domain: What Skills Do
ENTR Students Learn?
Opportunity generation /creativity
Feasibility assessment
Planning new ventures
New venture implementation
Growth
Harvest / exit
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference15
16. The Startup Courses
Creativity (brainstorming, etc.)
Opportunity scanning and selection
Feasibility analyses
New Business Plans
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference16
17. Corporate ENTR Ed
Managing growth (organic)
Deal-making
Mergers and acquisitions
Divestitures
Abandonments
Intellectual property
Valuation
Innovation management
New Products
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference17
18. Managing Growth
Only 1 of 14 ENTR courses at Rowan
Edward Lowe Foundation data: 45% of USA
net job creation occurs among firms with 10-
99 employees, $1Million-$100Million
TAB’s Growth course at Rowan:
Buy a business ($100K - $250K, with leverage):
What is worth buying? What is not?
Add value: grow it (by adding what?)
Exit and harvest added value
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference18
19. Specialty Courses
Franchising Sectors
New venture finance Retail
Corporate innovation Tourism
management Fashion
Excellence in Small Food
Business Management Agriculture
Family Business Manufacturing
Technology
Social / not-for-profit
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference19
20. Can ENTR Ed Fit into Business Ed?
Karl Vesper (U Washington): No, need separate schools
(Coleman keynote at USASBE ….)
Bruce (UND): $50 million School of ENTR
More than half of US schools now trying anyway
Many international programs
Faculty converted from
Practitioners (personal evidence, learning, stories)
Strategy, Marketing, Engineering, etc. (Textbooks, research evidence?)
Emerging faculty with PhDs in ENTR: (Louisville, Boulder,
MIT, Indiana, UMKC, others)
Does it make a difference?
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference20
21. Where Does ENTR Fit?
Creative destruction (Schumpeter, Branson)
Innovation: creation and management (Tidd)
Insights into the bleeding edge of management
(Ducker)
Critical importance of dynamic orgs,
(Christensen)
Intelligence (Romer)
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference21
22. Across functional disciplines
Accounting: Tax strategies; Cash flow
forecasts
Strategy: Creation, change, M&A,
Marketing: New product / New venture
assessments, launches
Finance: Valuation, re-assignment of assets,
asset classes
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference22
23. Methods of Teaching / Learning
Lecture / study
Practice
Theory & Practice
Different Learning Styles (e.g., Learning
Concept Inventory; Tom Hawk paper)
Learning Motivations
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference23
24. Motivations to Learn
Each student needs at least one thing that pulls
him / her into the material
With that “velcro,” students then study the rest
of the material
How do we learn?
How many kinds of hooks?
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference24
25. Learning Velcro:
Conceptual Thinking
Written word Simulations
Spoken word Practice reality
Displayed word, e.g., Pictures
PPT Video
Cases Music
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference25
26. Story-Telling Experiences &
Empirically Based Research
Story-telling Empirical literature
Direct contact Broad patterns
Students enjoy Extrapolate
Like case method Not enough detail to
Hard to extrapolate to determine valid
new situations, different exceptions
people. May limit creativity
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference26
27. Theory & Practice
Courses Experiential learning
Textbooks From experts
Structured learning From personal
Best practices experience
Testable, in common PBL = Project-Based
Relative expertise Learning
Body of knowledge Adapted to individual
Modeled on successful Personal meaning
practitioners
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference27
28. Internships in Japan, AY2006
Kyodo News, reported in The Daily Yomiuri:
21 November, 2007, p. 2: Education, Science
and Technology Ministry (Japan)
50,430 internships from 482 Japanese
universities in AY 2006
66% of universities, up 35% over AY 2005
8,000 more internships than AY 2005
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference28
29. Experiential Learning in ENTR
Internships: Projects within the ENTR Center
(freshmen?)
Apprenticeships: Assistant to the Entrepreneur
Junior Partners: Sweat equity, with Senior Partner
Employee
Manager
Partner
Owner: Select, plan, launch, operate, exit
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference29
30. On-Campus Ventures: 30-60?
What campus-related ventures could ENTR students
own and operate?
Brain-storming session: 3-4 >> 30-65!!
Freshmen: work in several
Sophomores: buy in
Juniors: manage
Seniors: own and exit
Putting them through college by virtue of ENTR
experience: Will parents buy in?
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference30
31. Impacts of University ENTR
Programs
Presence on campus: attitudes, legends, stories
May affect learning models, expected outcomes
Indirect: friend, colleague
Once over lightly: one workshop or course:
creating potential for lifelong learning
Minors and Certificates: skills, attitudes
Majors, Specialists: careers, professionals
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference31
32. Conclusions
Still a very young field: much left to learn
Vitally important domain: creating value, and
managing its growth.
Focus on core outcomes: successful venture
development, value-added, change
management
Professional standards: best practices,
measurable outcomes, transferable knowledge.
23 November 2007 Dr. Tom Bryant @ NAME Conference32